Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1026 S & A Answer and Affirmative Defenses To Fab's Amd Supp Comp. 07.182022
1026 S & A Answer and Affirmative Defenses To Fab's Amd Supp Comp. 07.182022
LAURENCE S. SCHEIDER,
STEPHANIE L. SCHNEIDER, et. al.,
PY
Defendants.
_______________./
CO
FIRST AMERICAN BANK, as successor
by merger to Bank of Coral Gables, LLC,
D
Plaintiff,
vs.
Third Pa1ty Defendant, S & A Capital Partners, loc. ("S&A Capital"), through
O
N
FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK, 07/18/2022 05:28:00 PM
conta ined in paragraph 2 and they are therefore denied.
PY
6. S&A Capital lacks sufficient kllowledge to admit or deny the allegations
CO
contained in paragraph 6 and they are therefore denied.
D
contained in paragraph 7 and they are therefore denied.
8. IE
S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
IF
contained in paragraph 8 and they are therefore den ied.
RT
9. With respect to paragraph 9, S&A Capital admits that this Court has subject
I 0. With respect to paragraph I 0, S&A Capital admits that venue is proper in Palm
Beach County.
A
2
18. S&A Capital denies the allegations contained in paragraph 18.
19. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
PY
22. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
CO
contained in paragraph 22 and they are therefore denied.
23. With respect to paragraph 23, S&A Capital admits its principal, mailing,
D
registered agent, and authorized persons addresses are 290 I Clint More Road, #4 I 0, Boca Raton,
IE
FL 33496. S&A Capital denies any remaining al legations.
IF
24. S&A Capital denies the allegations contained in paragraph 24.
RT
26. S&A Capita l lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
CE
27. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
A
28. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
O
N
29. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
30. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
3
31. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
32. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
33. S&A Capital lacks sutlicient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
PY
34. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
CO
contained in paragraph 34 and they are therefore denied.
D
36. With respect to paragraph 36, S&A Capital admits it has made distributions to
IE
the Sclmeiders, and paid management fees and other earned conJpensation to REF and Laurence.
IF
S&A Capital denies any remaining allegations.
RT
37. S&A Capita l lacks su!licient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
38. With respect to paragraph 38, S&A Capital admits that Brad, Paige and Stephanie
are shareholders of S&A Capital, that Brad it its vice president and is a signer on S&A Capital's
A
bank account and is aware of its financial activities and exercises control and oversight over
T
39. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
40. S&A Capita l lacks su!licient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
4
conta ined in paragraph 41 and they are therefore denied.
42. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
43. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
44. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
PY
contained in paragraph 44 and they are therefore denied.
CO
45. S&A Capital denies the allegations contained in paragraph 45.
46. S&A Capital lacks sutlicient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
D
contained in paragraph 46 and they are therefore denied.
47. IE
With respect to paragraph 47, S&A Capital admits that No,t hern Tmst froze
IF
accounts titled in the name of S&A in response to a writ of garnishment pertaining to Laurence.
RT
Den ied, however, that this indicates that Laurence maintains ownership and control over the
48. With respect to paragraph 48, S&A Capital re-alleges and iJJcorporates berein its
49. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
T
50. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
52. S&A Capital Jacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
5
conta ined in paragraph 52 and they are therefore denied.
53. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
54. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
55. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
PY
contained in paragraph 55 and they are therefore denied.
CO
56. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
D
57. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
IE
contained in paragraph 57 and they are tberefore denied.
IF
58. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
RT
59. S&A Capita l lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
CE
60. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
A
61. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
O
N
62. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
contained in paragraph 62 and they are therefore denied. With respect to the "WHEREFORE"
clause following paragraph 62 , the allegations contain no factual information and are legal
conclusions to which no response is required. To the extent that the allegations require a
6
response, S&A Capital denies the allegations.
63. With respect to paragraph 63, S&A Capital re-alleges and incorporates herein its
PY
67. S&A Capital denies the allegations contained in paragraph 67.
CO
68. S&A Capital denies the allegations contained in paragraph 68.
D
70. S&A Capital denies the allegations contained in paragraph 70.
71. IE
S&A Capital denies the allegations contained in paragraph 71.
IF
72. S&A Capital denies the allegations contained in paragraph 72.
RT
73. S&A Capital denies the allegations contained in paragraph 73. With respect to
the "WHEREFORE" clause following paragraph 73, the allegations contain no factua l
CE
infonnatioo and arc legal conclusions to which no respoose is required. To tbe exteot that the
74. With respect to paragraph 74, S&A Capital re-alleges and incorporates herein its
T
75. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
76. S&A Capita l lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
77. S&A Capital Jacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
7
conta ined in paragraph 77 and they are therefore denied.
78. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
79. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
80. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
PY
contained in paragraph 80 and they are therefore denied.
CO
8 1. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
D
82. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
IE
contained in paragraph 82 and they are tberefore denied.
IF
83. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
RT
84. S&A Capita l lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
CE
85. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
A
86. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
O
N
87. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
88. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
contained in paragraph 88 and they are therefore denied. With respect to the "WHEREFORE"
8
clause following paragraph 88, the allegations contain no facnial infonnation and are legal
conclusions to which no response is required. To the extent that the allegations require a
89. With respect to paragraph 89, S&A Capital re-alleges and incorporates herein its
90. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
PY
contained in paragraph 90 and they are therefore denied.
CO
9 1. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
D
92. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
IE
contained in paragraph 92 and they are tberefore denied.
IF
93. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
RT
94. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
CE
95. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
A
96. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
O
N
97. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
98. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
9
99. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
I00. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
IOI. S&A Capital lacks sutlicient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
PY
I02. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
CO
contained in paragraph I 02 and they are therefore den ied. With respect to the "WHEREFORE"
clause following paragraph I 02, the allegations contain no facnial information and are legal
D
conclusions to which no response is required. To the extent that the allegations require a
I 04. S&A Capita l lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
CE
105. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
A
I 06. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
O
N
I07. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
108. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
10
I 09. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
contained in paragraph I 09 and they are therefore denied. With respect to the "WHEREFORE''
clause following paragraph I 09, the allegations contain no factual infonnation and are legal
conclusions to wh ich no response is required. To the extent that the allegations require a
PY
its responses in paragraphs I through 47 of this Answer.
CO
I I I. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
D
112. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
IE
contained in paragraph 112 and they are therefore denied.
IF
11 3. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
RT
114. S&A Capita l lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
CE
contained in paragraph 116 and they are therefore denied. With respect to the "WHEREFORE"
clause following paragraph 116, the allegations contain no factual infonnation and are legal
conclusions to wh ich no response is required. To the extent that the allegations require a
117. With respect to paragraph 117, S&A Capital re-alleges and inco.,,orates herein its
11
responses in paragraphs I through 4 7 of this Answer.
120. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
PY
contained in paragraph 120 and they are therefore denied.
CO
12 1. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
D
122. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
IE
contained in paragraph 122 and they are tberefore denied.
IF
123. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
RT
contained in paragraph 123 and they are therefore den ied. With respect to the "WHEREFORE"
clause following paragraph 123, the allegations contain no factual information and arc legal
CE
conclusions to wb ich no response is required. To the extent that the allegatious require a
124. With respect to paragraph 124, S&A Capital re-alleges and incorporates herein its
T
125. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
126. S&A Capita l lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
127. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny tbe allegations
12
conta ined in paragraph 127 and they are therefore denied. With respect to the "WHEREFORE"
clause following paragraph 127, the allegations contain no factual information and are legal
conclusions to wh ich no response is required. To the extent that the allegations require a
128. With respect to paragraph 128, S&A Capital re-alleges and incorporates herein its
PY
129. S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
CO
contained in paragraph 129 and they are therefore den ied.
130. S&A Capita l lacks sutlicient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
D
contained in paragraph 130 and they are therefore denied.
13 l. IE
S&A Capital lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
IF
contained in paragraph 13 I and they are therefore den ied.
RT
132. S&A Capita l lacks su!licient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations
contained in paragraph 132 and they arc therefore denied. With respect to the "WHEREFORE''
CE
clause following paragrapb 132, the al legations contain no factual information and are legal
conclusions to wh ich no response is required. To the extent that the allegations require a
A
All allegations contained in the Complaint that arc not expressly admitted are hereby
O
N
denied.
13
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
In further responding to the Complaint, S&A Capital asserts the following affirmative
defenses:
l•IRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE. Plaintiff has fai led to state a claim upon wbich
relief may be granted, as Plaintiff has fai led to adequately allege the sharebolders ofS&A Capital
PY
SECOND AFFIRMA TJVE DEFENSE. Plaintiff's equitable claim for reverse piercing
CO
ofS&A Capital's Corporate Veil is barred, in whole or in part, because Plaintiff has an adequate
remedy at law in the form of enforcing its judgment for money damages against Laurence
D
Schneider and has failed to show that it cannot satisfy its judgment against Laurence Schneider
IE
without having to resort to the extreme equitable remedy of reverse piercing of S&A Capita l's
IF
corporate veiI.
RT
S&A Capital's Corporate Veil must be subordinated, in whole, or in part the to the interests of
CE
innocent shareholders of S&A Capital whose rights and claims to the income, assets, and good
ofS&A Capital's Corporate Veil must be subordinated, in whole, or in pan the to the interests of
O
N
corporate creditors whose rights and claims to the inc-0me, assets, and good will of the company
FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE. Plaintifl's equitable claim for reverse pierc ing of
S&A Capital's Corporate Vei l is limited to the surplus assets of the corporation.
14
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the date of filing this document, as reflected by thee-filing
stamp inserted upon it by the C le rk of the Court, a true a nd correct copy of the foregoing was
forwarded via e-mai l lo the allorneys of record as set forth on the Florida Court's E-Fi ling Portal.
PY
170 I West Hillsboro Blvd., #203
Deerfield Beach, Florida 33442
P: (954) 947-6250 I f: (954) 289-4537
CO
en1ail: eservice@klslawgroup.com
Allomey for Third Party Defendant
S&A Capital Partners, lnc.
D
Isl S ean D. Hummel
SEAN D. HUMMEL (FBN 939757)
IE
1701 West Hillsboro Blvd., #203
Deerfield Beach, Florida 33442
IF
P: (954) 385-3111 / F: (954) 653-4171
email: scan@hummclaw.com
Attorney fo r T hird Party Defendant
RT
15