Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Callogenesis Capabilityand Calli Somaclonal Variationof Costmary
Callogenesis Capabilityand Calli Somaclonal Variationof Costmary
2, 2010
Copyright © 2010 University of Bucharest Printed in Romania. All rights reserved
ORIGINAL PAPER
.
Abstract
Tanacetum balsamita L. (Costmary) has long history of use as an important medicinal herb for
treatment of many diseases. The objective of the present study was to establish an in-vitro tissue
culture protocol for calli production and somaclonal variation study of calli derived from different
plant parts of costmary. Nodal segments, petiole and leaf disc explants were employed for calli
production on 6 different MS media supplemented with different combinations of 2,4-D (1 and 2
mg/L) and BAP (0.2, 0.5 and 1 mg/L) and two magnesium ion concentrations (185 and 370 mg/L).
Callus production was significantly higher on MgMS basal medium containing 1 mg/L 2,4-D + 1
mg/L BAP. To assess somaclonal variation, genomic DNA was extracted from calli of fourth
subculture. Ten RAPD primers were used to analyze genetic variation between callus samples. The
results showed different amplification patterns between callus samples from different subcultures.
Keywords: Tanacetum balsamita L., tissue culture, callus, somaclonal variation, RAPD
Introduction
The genus Tanacetum is one of about 100 genera in the tribe Anthemideae and family
Asteraceae. The basic chromosome number of the species in the tribe Anthemideae is 2n=18
[1]. Tanacetum balsamita L. is a perennial herbal plant that can grow up to 80 cm. Its
flowering tops are widely used as diuretic, flatulent, appetizer, aphrodisiac, vermifugal,
emmenagogue and for migraine [2]. There are limited studies on tissue culture and
micropropagation of Tanacetum species except for one or two cosmopolitan species
producing compounds of economic value [3-5]. Higher plants, as source of medicinal
compounds, continue to play a dominant role in human health [6]. Members of the
Anthemideae have been occupied an important place in the traditional system of medicine all
over the world [3]. A number of studies have been conducted with the aim of inducing calli
production from a number of explant sources. This trend has been experienced in many
species of the Anthemideae [3]. The techniques of plant tissue culture in medicinal plants
include the following sequential stages or developments: selection of desired plant among
wild counterparts with high-metabolite producing capability, in-vitro culture for callogenesis,
which involves the selection and stabilization of explants with high calli production potential;
industrial scaling-up of calli with probably high expected medicinal material, mass calli
cultivation in bioreactors, and extraction and purification of the sought compounds [7].
Previously, the effect of Mg ion with different concentrations has been investigated on
organized chamomile cultures and it was found that Mg enhanced both the biomass formation
and essential oil production of organized cultures [8]. Furthermore, magnesium ion is
indispensable for plant growth and development [8,9]. Somaclonal variation, a common
phenomenon in plant cell and tissue cultures, includes all types of variations that can be
5120
ATEFEH MOHAJJEL SHOJA, MOHAMMAD BAGHER HASSANPOURAGHDAM,
MAHMOUD KHOSROWSHAHLI, ALI MOVAFEGHI
present among plants or cells derived from “in vitro” cultures [10].
RAPD (Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA) analysis using PCR in association with
short primers of arbitrary sequence has been demonstrated to be sensitive and useful method
in detecting variation among individuals [10].
The present experiment was carried out to establish a protocol for calli production in
T. balsamita L. different explants based on MS medium as well as to assay somaclonal
variation between subcultures of calli derived from petiole explants.
This is the first report on the in-vitro culture of costmary. Callus induction was
established successfully on the MS, Mg+MS and Mg/2+MS culture media (Table 1). The
callus induction in Mg+MS medium showed a higher biomass, expressed in growth index and
callogenesis compared with those grown on MS and Mg/2+MS media. These factors were not
shown for the MS/2, Mg+MS/2 and Mg/2+MS/2 media because of their non-significant
effects. Previous studies on chamomile tissue cultures have shown the positive effect of
magnesium ion on the biomass and calli growth [8]. Addition of MgSO4 to the solid and
liquid MS media favorably affected the biomass and essential oil production of chamomile
hairy root cultures [8,9]. In the present research this effect has been proven clearly. Tissue
culture technology enabling the rapid production of a large quantity of uniform plants from a
single plant with good genetic potential is gaining importance in recent times [12]. Synergetic
effects of plant growth regulators play an important role in callus induction and cell
differentiation [13]. The difference in the callogenesis of different explants may be a result of
differences in their intrinsic potential. In general, an increase of auxin levels such as 2,4-D in
the medium stimulates dedifferentiation of the cells [13]. Costmary showed the best callus
induction in the MgMS basal medium with the combination of 1 mg/L of both BAP and 2,4-D.
In the present study, a total of 10 arbitrary 10-mer primers were screened to detect
somaclonal variation using DNA samples of donor mother plant and calli of 4 different
petiole subcultures. A total of 66 bands were generated with these primers. The profiles of
amplified RAPD markers (Figure 2) showed that the donor plant and calli of petiole’s
different subcultures had different banding patterns that classified them in 3 groups (Figure
1).
5122 Romanian Biotechnological Letters, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2010
ATEFEH MOHAJJEL SHOJA, MOHAMMAD BAGHER HASSANPOURAGHDAM,
MAHMOUD KHOSROWSHAHLI, ALI MOVAFEGHI
Tree Diagram for 5 Variables
Unweighted pair-group average
Dissimilarities from matrix
M1
M2
M3
M4
M5S
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Linkage Distance
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of RAPD-PCR for in vitro culture derived calli of costmary.
M1, M2, M3, M4 and M5 refer to first, second, third and forth subcultures of petiole and mother plant respectively.
Figure 2. DNA pattern of Tanacetum balsamita L. calli based on PCR-RAPD analysis using 10 different ten-mer primers.
Lanes 1-4: first, second, third and forth subcultures of petiole and Lane 5: mother plant respectively.
Romanian Biotechnological Letters, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2010 5123
Callogenesis Capability and Calli Somaclonal Variation of Costmary (Tanacetum balsamita L.)
These results indicate that there was a variance among the mother plant and calli of
first, second, third and fourth subcultures. It was concluded that calli of the different
subcultures were not reliable in producing genetically similar pattern to the mother plant, but
Rout (2006) reported that somaclonal variation in the callus cultures can be a promising
source for creating new cultivars in plants and for isolating cell lines with high capacity of
producing desired secondary compounds [14].
In conclusion, the current experiment was an initial step towards the mass production
of calli from costmary different explants. Leaf and petiol were the preferential explants with
acceptable results. However, selection of desired somaclones from different calli and
monitoring of high valued compounds need further and detailed investigation.
References
1. M. KESKITALO, A. POHTO, M.L. SAVELA, J.P.T. VALKONENE, J. SIMON, E. PEHU, Ann. Appl.
Biol., 133, 281-296 (1998).
2. M. KARAKA, H. OZBEK, H.A. AKKAN, M. TUTUNCU, F. OZGOKES, A. HIM, B. BAKIR, Asian J.
Anim. Vet. Adv., 4, 320-325 (2009).
3. J.A. TEIXEIRA DA SILVA, Afr. J Biotechnol., 2, 547-556 (2003).
4. J.A. TEIXEIRA DA SILVA, Biotechnol. Adv., 21, 715-766 (2003).
5. J.A. TEIXEIRA DA SILVA, S. FUKAI, Asian J. Plant Sci., 2, 505-514 (2003).
6. E. ULATUNDE FAROMBI, Afr. J. Biotechnol., 2, 662-671 (2003).
7. K.C. TORRES, Overview of callus (tissue) and organ culture, Academic Press, 1994, pp. 73-79.
8. L. EVA, M. EMOKE, A.K. SANDOR, S. LARA, L. EVA, J. Am. Coll. Nutr., 23, 763-767 (2004).
9. N.C. WOOK, M.J. LEE, K.W. PARK, Acta Hort., 10, 485-488 (2001).
10. P.N BORDALLO, D.H. SILVA, J. MARIA, C.D. CRUZ, E.P. FONTES, Hort. Brasil., 2, 300-304 (2004).
11. J.J. DOYLE, J.L. DOYLE, Phytochem Bull., 19, 11-15 (1987).
12. V.L. SHEELA, N.S. RAMACHANDRAN, J. Trop. Agric., 39, 1-4 (2001).
13. M. ZIA, R. REHMAN, M.F. CHAUDHARY, Afr. J. Biotechnol., 6, 1874-1878 (2007).
14. G.R. ROUT, A. MOHAPATRA, J.S. MOHAN, Biotechnol. Adv., 24, 531-560 (2006).