Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Using Strategy Maps To Prioritize Learning and Performance Improvement Agendas (Performance Improvement, Vol. 46, Issue 2) (2007)
Using Strategy Maps To Prioritize Learning and Performance Improvement Agendas (Performance Improvement, Vol. 46, Issue 2) (2007)
Using Strategy Maps To Prioritize Learning and Performance Improvement Agendas (Performance Improvement, Vol. 46, Issue 2) (2007)
There are best practices that organizations can employ to link their learning initiatives to corporate
strategy. Human capital and human performance technology (HPT) professionals need to push their
organizations to embrace a performance improvement agenda that is linked to strategy, and organi-
zations need to include a learning representative in the strategic development process. If the human
capital or HPT professional and CEO work together toward a common goal, the business can achieve
the greatest benefit from learning initiatives.
ORGANIZATIONS OFTEN SPEND exorbitant amounts ing 85% of that value is intangible, consisting of such
of money training employees. Executives are under things as knowledge and brand (Kaplan & Norton, 2004).
immense pressure to justify investments in learning or Human capital is now the dominant asset in today’s busi-
performance improvement initiatives. However, it can be nesses. However, many executives still use financial man-
difficult to gauge the return on these investments. This agement tools that treat human capital as an expense
stems from the fact that learning investments are typical- instead of an asset.
ly not aligned well with a company’s overall strategy.
Thus, organizations are unable to measure the extent to
which these investments support their critical business THE CHALLENGE OF MEASURING
objectives. LEARNING ASSETS
If organizations do not first identify how learning pro- Learning and performance improvement is an important
grams can help them attain their strategic goals, these intangible asset in which organizations invest. However,
programs can be wasteful and drain productivity. This most organizations have a difficult time quantifying the
disconnect leads many executives to place a low value on return on these investments. Measuring human behavior
training initiatives. and its contribution to organizational results has long
challenged management.
THE SHIFT TOWARD INTANGIBLE Today, some forward-thinking organizations are using
nonfinancial measures to communicate the importance of
ASSETS investing in intangibles and to demonstrate intangibles’
Businesses used to be valued almost exclusively in terms effect on financials. The balanced scorecard is one tool that
of their tangible assets. But the world has changed signif- organizations are using to set up metrics showing how
icantly. According to research published in 2000 by the intangible assets help the company to meet strategic goals.
Brookings Institution, only 15% of the value of today’s The balanced scorecard is a management tool that enables
organizations can be traced to tangible assets; the remain- organizations to clarify their strategy and translate it into
Performance Improvement, vol. 46, no. 2, February 2007
©2007 International Society for Performance Improvement
26 Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) • DOI: 10.1002/pfi.105
action. It takes into consideration an organization’s busi- map requires more than merely describing the strategy in
ness processes and external outcomes to help management relation to the market of the business, however. It also
to continuously improve strategic performance and involves taking a holistic look at perspectives ranging
results. With the learning and growth perspective of the from financial statements to customer value propositions
balanced scorecard, organizations can measure objectives to internal processes to learning and development roles,
such as culture, skills, leadership, teamwork, and knowl- each of which has a profound impact on the company’s
edge. Many organizations measure the extent to which performance. Developing a strategy map is also very use-
employees understand the organization’s strategy. ful for building consensus among executive team mem-
Investing in communicating the strategy and educating bers so they can agree on the investments they need to
employees on it has a big payoff. Organizations with a rel- make in their people.
atively high percentage of employees who understand the Defining a strategy map is necessary for understanding
strategy are more successful than organizations with less the context for cause-and-effect relationships within the
informed employees in executing their strategy (Norton, organization. Although business leaders may intuitively
2006). There is a cause-and-effect relationship between understand this cause-and-effect chain, it is often difficult
employees’ understanding the strategy and higher em- to define and map these relationships in an unambiguous
ployee engagement, more engaged customers, and better manner. Many organizations do not have a clear way to
financial results. communicate their strategy throughout the organization.
In fact, a 2006 study by the Palladium Group and Cognos
Inc. found that up to 95% of organizations do not tell
DEFINING CAUSE AND EFFECT their employees what the organization’s business strategy
BETWEEN PERFORMANCE IMPROVE- is. Although many businesses invest in strategic planning
documents, the resulting decisions are often not well
MENT AND FINANCIAL RESULTS articulated and shared throughout the enterprise.
Essentially, a strategy map is a one-page picture of an A strategy map is an effective tool for organizations
organization’s strategy that articulates the strategic objec- looking to better communicate their strategy to all
tives (see the example in Figure 1). Defining a strategy employees and stakeholders. Once developed the strategy
CASSANDRA A. FRANGOS is the human capital practice leader at Palladium Group, Inc., the
world’s leading authority on strategy execution. She leads research programs on human capital and
consults to Fortune 500 organizations, including American Express, Canon, Merck, Wells Fargo, and
others in the areas of strategic management, human capital strategy, HR balanced scorecard, and
performance management. A recognized thought leader, Cassandra has published several
articles––including “Creating a Strategy-Focused Workforce,” which appeared in the Balanced
Scorecard Report (Harvard Business School Press)––and has presented at several leading industry
events worldwide. She has also collaborated with the cocreators of the balanced scorecard and strat-
egy maps, Robert Kaplan and David Norton, to identify next generation best practices in human cap-
ital. Cassandra may be reached at cassandra.frangos@palladiumES.com.