Disclaimer: This is a machine generated PDF of selected content from our databases.

This functionality is provided solely for your

convenience and is in no way intended to replace original scanned PDF. Neither Cengage Learning nor its licensors make any
representations or warranties with respect to the machine generated PDF. The PDF is automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS
AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. CENGAGE LEARNING AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY
AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY,
ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
PURPOSE. Your use of the machine generated PDF is subject to all use restrictions contained in The Cengage Learning
Subscription and License Agreement and/or the Gale Academic OneFile Terms and Conditions and by using the machine
generated PDF functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against Cengage Learning or its licensors for your use of the
machine generated PDF functionality and any output derived therefrom.

The right to sell passports; Charlemagne.

Date: Sept. 26, 2020
From: The Economist
Publisher: Economist Intelligence Unit N.A. Incorporated
Document Type: Article
Length: 1,020 words

Full Text:
A crackdown on "golden passports" raises questions about citizenship the eu would rather not answer

AN EU PASSPORT is one of the most desirable documents on the planet. Its bearer can live and work in 27 different countries, all of
them prosperous and peaceful. Many have excellent food, too. In the birthright lottery of citizenship, those with a burgundy ticket
marked "European Union" are among the lucky winners. Putting a pricetag on this is hard, but Cyprus has managed it. Invest
[euro]2.2m ($2.6m) in the island and a Cypriot passport with all the benefits of EU citizenship can be yours. Malta runs a similar (and,
at just over [euro]1m, rather cheaper) scheme for anyone tired of travelling with papers that open fewer doors.

Not everyone thinks this is a good idea. In a recent speech Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission's president, mentioned
such "golden passports" as one of a list of threats to the rule of law in Europe, alongside judge-nobbling. Her annoyance is
understandable. Since anyone with an EU passport can move anywhere in the bloc, a quick buck for the Cypriot government can
create problems for the rest of the EU. Cyprus has made [euro]7bn from the scheme since its launch in 2013, which amounts to a
quarter of the island's annual GDP. It has sold passports to plenty of rich but disagreeable folk, who are now free to settle in Germany
or France.

Banning such sales would be popular. But it is no simple matter. Deciding who is and is not a citizen is a jealously guarded right of
EU member states. All EU countries issue passports for reasons beyond the bog-standard naturalisation of those who marry a local
or live in the country in question long enough to qualify. Some countries hand them out to curry favour with diasporas, atone for
historic wrongs or create new voters. Being an EU citizen may come with common rights. But there is stark disagreement among the
member states as to who should be allowed to be one.

Some EU countries, particularly those with large diasporas, dish out the burgundy like a wine wholesaler at Christmas. Ireland allows
anyone with an Irish grandparent to claim Irish citizenship. Given Irish enthusiasm for emigration, this leaves an uncountable number
of potential Irish abroad. In Britain alone, an estimated 6m people would qualify for an Irish passport. That is about 20% more than
live in Ireland, and thanks to Brexit, many have good cause to apply for one. Italy is even more generous to its diaspora. Anyone with
a male Italian ancestor has a shot at an Italian passport. Along the patrilineal line, there is no upper limit, so the right goes back to
1861 and the creation of Italy. (The rights of descendents of women only start in 1948.) Between 1998 and 2010, 1m people obtained
an Italian passport in this way. According to one estimate, 60m potential Italian citizens lurk around the globe. (However, many have
settled in even richer places, such as America, and are unlikely to return.)

Passports can be given out for political purposes. Hungary's prime minister, Viktor Orban, has been the most cunning in this regard.
After the first world war redrew eastern Europe's borders, ethnic Hungarians were left scattered across neighbouring countries, such
as Serbia and Romania. Mr Orban's government has eased citizenship rules in an attempt to naturalise and enfranchise 1m of them.
Between 2011 and 2016, 180,000 new Hungarians were created every year--more than the number of naturalisations in France and
Germany, according to Yossi Harpaz in "Citizenship 2.0", a book on dual nationality. Anyone who can trace lineage back to the right
part of the Austro-Hungarian empire and is willing to learn Hungarian--a notoriously difficult language--can claim a passport.
(Predictably, Hungarian language schools have popped up across Serbia.) The strategy has worked: when these new Hungarian
citizens vote, they overwhelmingly support Mr Orban.

Offering citizenship as a form of atonement is common. Austria, which normally restricts dual nationality, now allows descendants of
Jews who were expelled, or fled, during the 1930s and 1940s to claim a passport. A similar right can be found in Germany, where it is
embedded in the country's constitution. Spain goes back even further, allowing descendants of Sephardic Jews kicked out in the 15th
century to reclaim Spanish citizenship. (Descendants of Muslims kicked out in the same period have no such luck.)

A few countries take the opposite path and hoard their passports. Along with Austria, the Netherlands and Germany both have strict
rules on dual-nationals from outside the EU. In the days when citizens were regularly conscripted to butcher their neighbours,
restrictions on dual citizenship made sense. Now they seem outdated, serving only to leave immigrants--who may not want to give up
their other nationality--as perpetual outsiders.

Who are eu then?

If passports can be seen either as a commodity or political tool, on the one hand, or a life-long civic commitment on the other,
devising common rules for handing them out is close to impossible. Although member states are happy to slam Malta and Cyprus,
they do not appreciate criticism of how they themselves distribute citizenship. Some may balk at the idea of limiting dual nationality.
Others may be uncomfortable with the unknown size of the Irish and Italian diasporas who could turn up as EU citizens. How
countries seek to atone for the Holocaust is a deeply inappropriate question for an EU ruling. A clear definition of who qualifies for an
EU passport is the obvious next step for any passport-selling ban; it is also a nightmare.

An Al Capone approach may be enough for the EU to crack down on the current schemes operated by Malta and Cyprus. Rather
than stop them from selling passports outright, Brussels could pursue them via money-laundering legislation and make life difficult for
the dodgier newcomers. But a determined state--and some canny lawyers--could keep the golden passport trade going. Granting
citizenship is a huge power and member states are unlikely to give it up. That means they will probably have to tolerate their
neighbours selling passports to plutocrats.

Copyright: COPYRIGHT 2020 Economist Intelligence Unit N.A. Incorporated

http://store.eiu.com/
Source Citation (MLA 8th Edition)
"The right to sell passports; Charlemagne." The Economist, 26 Sept. 2020, p. 52(US). Gale Academic OneFile,
link.gale.com/apps/doc/A636363495/AONE?u=amst&sid=AONE&xid=ca922f89. Accessed 6 Jan. 2021.
Gale Document Number: GALE|A636363495