Professional Documents
Culture Documents
250600DBQND0026 - Exde00 - 16 - Management of Non-Conformity
250600DBQND0026 - Exde00 - 16 - Management of Non-Conformity
EX-DE 00 03/10/2016 Issued for Approval M. Dela Cruz D. O’Farrell M. Shaker M. Shaker M. Borriello
OGI002-QA-0039-00
DRAKE & SCULL INT’L PJSC
Contract N. 5000008451
Vendor logo and business name Vendor Identification
Order N.
Facility Name Location Scale Sheet of Sheets
ZUBAIR OIL FIELD - WATER INJECTION ONSHORE NA 1 of 16
NETWORK INSTALLATION
Document Title Supersedes N.
REVISION HISTORY
INDEX
2. RESPONSIBILITIES ....................................................................................................................... 4
8. ATTACHEMENTS ......................................................................................................................... 14
2. RESPONSIBILITIES
Sl.
Position Responsibilities
No.
1 Project Manager Shall report to Project Director.
Shall be responsible to review the root cause of NCR and to
provide necessary guidance to implement the proactive
preventive measures to avoid recurrence.
Shall lead his team of key personnel in discussions with
Company about corrective and preventive actions against Non-
conformances.
Shall consult Construction Superintendent, Contracts Manager,
Engineering Manager, and QA / QC Manager in connection with
NCRs from Company.
3. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
3.1 INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS
4.2 DEFINITIONS
5. PROCEDURE
5.1 Identification and Reporting of the Non-conformance:
System non conformances such as revealed during audits and incoming material inspections are dealt
with, according to respective procedures.
Any product, which has failed in testing, shall be brought to the notice of QA/QC Manager by Site
Engineer / Supervisor for NC resolutions.
Personnel identifying an anomalous situation shall notify their direct supervisor or to the QC Engineer /
HSE Engineer in a verbal manner.
This information will be collected and analyzed by QC Engineers and HSE Engineer who are
responsible for evaluating Non Conformances in view of the problems notified.
The Discipline Supervisor is responsible for involving the QC Engineer / HSE Engineer in order to
manage the event (depending on the type of event).
The issuer shall also complete the part "A" of the "Non-conformance Report" form (NCR) indicating all
pertinent details of the non-conformance and the respective reference standard or document.
The completed form shall be submitted to the QC Engineer, for review, registration in the NCR log and
assignment of the identification number.
Original of the NCR shall be forwarded at this point to the respective Discipline Supervisor, who shall
complete the part "B" of the form with details of the proposed remedial action and shall sign it.
The part "B" shall be approved by the Construction Manager (or a higher function)
Remedial actions which do not implicate any cost or schedule impacts (e.g. technical items
deviating from specified standards) shall be formally discussed and resolved with Company
Representative if external, who shall then sign the part “B” of the NCR for concurrence.
For remedial actions which implicate cost or schedule impacts, DSI shall issue to Company a
Deviation Request (DR) / Technical Query (TQ) concerning the proposed remedial action; the
respective cross reference shall be noted on all documents.
Upon resolution of the Deviation Request by the Company, the remedial action shall be carried out and
recorded on the relevant NCR, accordingly.
On receipt of the notification, the QC Engineer will examine the product/ procedure and will establish
the Non-conformance validity.
If the NC is deemed valid, the QC Engineer (or, in his absence, the QC Inspector) with the Discipline
Supervisor will assess the non-conforming situation. QC Engineer will inform about NC to QA / QC
Manager immediately.
If the QA / QC Manager receive a formal written complaint in the NCR format from the Client, regarding
the quality of the work, a copy of the documentation is forwarded to the Project Manager and QHSE
Manager and to concerned department heads for disposition and corrective action.
An effective system shall be evolved wherein all Customer complaints (quality related findings) shall be
recorded and monitored for necessary corrective actions on regular basis.
Feedback regarding proposed corrective action to address the quality related findings and effective
implementation of corrective action and documentation shall be communicated to the originator of the
complaints.
After ascertaining the Non-conformance the QC Engineer (or in his absence the QC Inspector) with
the Discipline Supervisor, fills out Non-conformance Report (see ATTACHMENT 1).
All the details of the Non-conformance and the relevant standards or reference documents, as well as
the area, persons involved in the inspection must be indicated, providing also reference to the relevant
paragraph of the Inspection & Test plan, if applicable.
Basis of non-conformity: Give sufficient reasons based on which subject disagreement is considered
as non-conformity.
The NCR is recorded in NCR master log (ATTACHEMNT 2) giving it the next progressive ID number.
After any non-conforming products / items have been identified, mark them with “HOLD” and
segregate them (if possible) to prevent any accidental use.
Ware house-in charge or Store officer shall be responsible for the entire operation.
A meeting will be convened by QA / QC Manager, with the vendor / supplier in the presence of Project
Manager to analyse the causes and arrive at appropriate solutions.
In case of process anomalies, the QC Engineer informs the department Head; he in turn may decide
to suspend activities while the NC is being remedied.
For any non-conformance identified by Company and addressed to Contractor, a hold on the Work
activity concerned shall be immediately put into place.
If the activities are pertaining to Sub contractors, concerned Department head and the QC Manager of
the Sub contractor will be called for a meeting with Contractor QA / QC Manager to analyse the
situation in order to bring a remedial action.
If the anomaly can be attributed to the activities pertaining to the Company, with regards to the product
/ process involved, identifying the anomaly and raising NCR is the responsibility of QC Department.
Any non-conformances noticed by Company, and when this is conveyed to QC Engineer, immediately
he shall inform QA / QC Manager.
If a formal written NCR received by Contractor from Company regarding quality of work, QA / QC
Manager will forward it to the Project manager for approval of suggested remedial action.
The QC inspector informs the QC Engineer who in turn informs the QA / QC Manager to begin
interfacing with the Company about the event.
The latter contacts the Company and reports the recorded anomaly, requesting the actions needed to
remedy the problem to be defined, checks the remedial actions suggested by the Company.
If the anomaly can be attributed to a Vendor / Subcontractor, about the product/ process involved,
identifying the anomaly and filling the Sections (from A to C) of the NCR form involves concerned
Department head and QC Department.
The Department head informs the QA / QC Manager who in turn informs Project Manager about the
event.
The latter contacts the Procurement Engineer (for NC to be addressed to Vendors) or concerned
department head in case of the Sub contractor and the recorded anomaly will be analysed and the
actions needed to remedy the problem will be decided.
Non-conformances concerning the working of equipment are managed like maintenance work.
Applying the identified remedial action, assessing its implementation and closing the case, filing and
recording the document and subsequent data collection shall be carried out by the concerned
discipline supervisor.
In case a Commercial Impact needs to be issued, this will be managed as described by the
procedures- “Technical Queries” as per Appendix G – Project Coordination. The approved
Commercial Impact shall be cross referenced on the NCR.
The person in charge of implementing the remedial actions informs his/ her personnel about actions to
be taken to solve the problem and then, on the basis of planning, shall check that they have been
correctly taken/ carried out.
If the anomaly is remedied, the QC Engineer receives the information from the person in charge with
implementing the remedial action, along with supporting evidence;
After taking remedial action, if non-conforming manufactured items are not considered acceptable
after the remedial actions, these are marked REJECTED and are removed as soon as possible from
the work site.
If the items are considered acceptable, the QC Engineer removes the term “HOLD” from the product
and/or restores operations.
The originator i.e., QA / QC Manager reviews the proposed corrective action. When reviewing the
proposed disposition, he must ensure that the proposed corrective action is practical and achievable,
and the implementation can be verified and closed.
If a non-conformance can be rectified simply and immediately, and the item satisfies all
specified requirements, then those responsible rectify it and no non-conformance
documentation is required.
If the non-conformance does not meet the criteria in a) or b) above, the finder of the
non-conformance:
i) Ensures any nonconforming materials are segregated where feasible and identified
using yellow “Hold” Tags or yellow “Hold” Stickers, paint or similar, where practicable.
No further work is performed on nonconforming items until their disposition is decided. Work may
continue in areas not affected by the non-conformance.
i.) Accept-as-is
Where the approved disposition is "accept-as-is", the non-conformance tags or stickers are
removed from the items by inspection, construction or materials control staff, and where
appropriate transferred out of quarantine for storage or released.
iii.) Reject
Where the approved disposition is "reject", the item is re-tagged "Reject" (red tag or sticker) by
inspection, construction or materials control staff and returned to the supplier or scrapped.
iv.) Regards
When the approved disposition is "regards", the item is re-tagged: "Accepted" (green tag or
sticker) by inspection, construction or materials control staff and the re-graded applications are
noted on the tag or sticker and the NCR.
After carrying out of the necessary analysis and assessment with reference to drawings,
specifications, codes and procedures, Q A / QC Manager shall recommend after consulting with the
concerned department heads, corrective actions, and measures taken to avoid recurrence of NC.
The same will be forwarded to Company for comments and approval.
A meeting will be convened with concerned department heads to determine the corrective and
preventive actions for the NCRs.
Corrected, reworked or repaired items shall be re-inspected and/or tested by qualified personnel for
compliance with the governing acceptability criteria.
Completion of the remedial action shall be verified by the discipline supervisor (DSI Representative),
who shall compile and sign in this respect part "C" of the NCR form.
After satisfactory completion of the disposition action and/or the effective implementation of corrective
action, including documentation, the DSI QA / QC Manager, or nominee and Company QA / QC Manager
if external, signs off the in the section “D“ titled "Close - out" and includes comments regarding
completion, re-inspection and final conformance including reference to reports/records as necessary.
6. DOCUMENTATION
Under the jurisdiction of QA / QC Manager QC Engineer, QC Inspector and Document
Controller shall keep system of Documentation for NCRs in a disciplined manner.
HSE related NCRs are generated by HSE Engineer and after necessary processing by Project HSE
Manager; these reports will be forwarded to Project QA / QC Manager.
NCRs are kept updated in a summary register in a sequential and consistent tracking system by
means of NCR master log.
At Field Nonconformance shall be documented using Form – QAF-OGI002_Form_001.
Project Quality Manager shall retain all NCR’s and the NCR Log in the Quality Files.
7. NCR FLOWCHART
ACTIVITY INVOLVEMENT ACTION
RECORD
Non-Conformances (A) - DSI Q.C Inspector - Complete and sign part “A” of NCR
- Company QC (If External) - Forward NCR to the DSI QC Engineer/ Company QC
REMEDIAL ACTION - DSI Discipline Supervisor (If Internal) - Complete and Sign part “B” of NCR
PROPOSAL (B) - Company Representative (If External) - Forward NCR to the DSI Construction Manager
-The DSI Constr. Manager signs part A+B of NCR for approval, if
internal
Cost or
Schedule - The Company Constr. Manager signs part A+B of NCR for
Impact YES approval, if external.
NO - DSI Construction Superintendent (or -The Company Rep. signs part B of NCR for concurrence
Issue of a higher function)
O
Deviation
Require to -NCR(s) regarding Remedial Action with no cost or schedule
COMPANY impact are directly forwarded to the Discipline Supervisor for
completion
Carry out the remedial action - DSI Construction - Correct, rework, repair, reject ( as applicable )
- DSI Qualified Personnel - Re-inspect /re-test correct item
- QC Engineer/Inspector (Internal/External)
CLOSE –OUT of
-Enters in NCR Log close-out information
NCR (D)
Authorizes removal of “ HOLD “ from item
8. ATTACHEMENTS
(Blank form)
Nonconformance Report (NCR) .......................................................................... QAF_OGI002_Form_001
Nonconformance Report Log ............................................................................. QAF_OGI002_Form_002
Remedial
Close Out Company
Action
Transmittal NCR Minor/Major Commercial I – Internal NCR Item Discipline Location Date
N° Number Issue Impact Yes / Verification Remarks
NCR E – External NCR
d Date No Date