Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 63

STELLA MARIS MTWARA UNIVERSITY

COLLEGE

(A Constituent College of St. Augustine University of Tanzania)

FACULTY OF EDUCATION

Investigation on the reasons for the failure of English speaking policy to students in

Tanzania secondary schools, case study was Mtwara Municipality

A Case Study at Mtwara Mikindani-Municipality

A Research Report Submitted to the Faculty of Education as a Partial Fulfillment for the

Requirements of an Award of Bachelor Degree in Philosophy with Education

Green J. Mwakatika

2022

i
COPYRIGHT

All rights reserved. No party of this Research Report may be reproduced, stored in retrieval

system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, photocopying, mechanical or

otherwise without the prior written permission of the author of that of Stella Maris Mtwara

University College (STEMMUCO)

ii
DECLARATION BY THE STUDENT

This research Report is my original work and has not been presented to any other examination

body. No part of this research report should be reproduced without my consent or that of Stella

Maris Mtwara University College.

Name: GREEN J.MWAKATIKA

Sign:…………………………

Date:………………………..

DECLARATION BY THE SUPERVISOR

This Research Report has been submitted for examination with my approval in Stella Maris

Mtwara University College.

Name: MR. MASANJA T.

(Supervisor)

Sign:…………………………………

Date: ………………………………..

iii
ACKNOWLEGDEMENTS

I am greatly indebted to a number of people who have assisted me in the preparation of this

Research Report. I would like to express my gratitude and thanks to all of them, however due to

constraints of time and space, the completion of this research Report.

My gratitude goes to almighty God for creating me a human being. I thank god for allowing me

to be one of the wonderful special, gracious creation and health during all the time when I was

conducting this research Report. Also my profound gratitude go to my supervisor MR. Masfor

being so friendly and approachable, thanks for valuable recommendations, guidance and advise

you provided to me during my research report time despite that you were tightly with the

university schedule

Lastly my appreciation goes to the entire staff member of faculty of education of Stellar Maris

Mtwara University College for their assistant either directly or indirectly.

iv
ABSTRACT

This research report concerned with the assessment on the failure of English speaking policy to

students in Tanzania secondary schools in Mtwara Mikindani Municipality as the case study. The

objectives aimed to find out the causes of the failure of English speaking policy in secondary

schools, to identify the effects of failure of English speaking policy secondary schools and to

suggest out possible ways to overcome the failure of English speaking policy in secondary

schools. The targeted samples of this study were teachers, students and educational officer. The

researcher used research methodology so as to get accurate data from the field area. Data

collection techniques involved were; interview and questionnaire. In order to collect data, the

researcher organized the data into tables, and the calculations were done to find out the

percentage, frequency and analyze the data obtained from the field. The research data were

analyzed through the use of qualitative for explanations and quantitative research for

calculations. Therefore the findings from the study were as follows; first objective of the study

required a researcher to assess the causes of the failure of English speaking policy in secondary

schools which are; poor foundation of English speaking from primary level and low motivation

to English teachers. Second objective required a researcher to assess the effects of failure of

English speaking policy to students such as miscommunication between teachers and students.

The third objective aimed at investigating the solutions such as intensive training of English

teachers, provide motivation to English teachers and students and establish English speaking

competition programs. Therefore it is recommended that the government should train English

teachers who are competent in order to produce students who have good foundation of English

language in secondary school and the government should ensure enough availability of learning

and teaching materials.

v
Table of Contents
COPYRIGHT...............................................................................................................................................i
DECLARATION BY THE STUDENT.......................................................................................................ii
ACKNOWLEGDEMENTS........................................................................................................................iii
ABSTRACT...............................................................................................................................................iv
CHAPTER ONE..........................................................................................................................................1
1.1 Introduction...........................................................................................................................................1
1.2 Background of the Study.......................................................................................................................1
1.3 Statement of the Study...........................................................................................................................5
1.4 Objectives of the Study..........................................................................................................................6
1.4.1 General Objective of the Study...........................................................................................................6
1.4.2 Specific Objectives of the Study.........................................................................................................6
1.5 Research Questions...............................................................................................................................6
1.6 Significances of the Study.....................................................................................................................6
1.7 Scope of the Study.................................................................................................................................7
1.8 Limitation of the Study..........................................................................................................................7
1.9 Definition of Key Terms........................................................................................................................7
1.10 Conceptual Framework........................................................................................................................8
CHAPTER TWO.........................................................................................................................................9
LITERATURE REVIEW............................................................................................................................9
2.1 Introduction...........................................................................................................................................9
2.2 Theoretical Literature............................................................................................................................9
2.3 Empirical Literature.............................................................................................................................10
2.4 Literature Review................................................................................................................................11
2.5 Gap of Knowledge...............................................................................................................................14
CHAPTER THREE...................................................................................................................................15
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY..............................................................................................................15
3.1 Introduction.........................................................................................................................................15
3.2 Research Approach..............................................................................................................................15
3.3 Research Design..................................................................................................................................15
3.4 Area of Study.......................................................................................................................................16
3.5 Sampling Techniques..........................................................................................................................16

vi
3.5.1 Simple Random Sampling................................................................................................................16
3.5.2 Purposive Sampling..........................................................................................................................16
3.6 Sample Size.........................................................................................................................................17
Table 1: Sample Size of the Respondents..................................................................................................17
3.7 Data Collection Techniques.................................................................................................................17
3.7.1 Interview...........................................................................................................................................18
3.7.2 Questionnaire....................................................................................................................................18
3.8 Data Analysis and Presentation...........................................................................................................18
CHAPTER FOUR.....................................................................................................................................19
DATA ANALYSIS, PRESENTATION AND INTERPRETATION........................................................19
4.1 Introduction.........................................................................................................................................19
4.1 Background Information of Respondents............................................................................................20
4.1.1 The Age of the Respondents.............................................................................................................20
4.1.2 The Age of Teachers.........................................................................................................................20
Table 2: The Age of Teachers...................................................................................................................20
4.1.3 The Age of the Students...................................................................................................................21
Table 3 The Age of Students.....................................................................................................................21
4.1.4 The Age of the Regional Educational Officer...................................................................................22
4.2 Sex of Respondents.............................................................................................................................22
4.2.1 Sex of Students.................................................................................................................................22
Table 4: Sex of Students............................................................................................................................22
4.2.2 Sex of Teachers................................................................................................................................23
Table 5: Sex of Teachers...........................................................................................................................23
4.2.3 Sex of Regional Educational.............................................................................................................23
4.3. Education Level of Respondents........................................................................................................23
4.3.1 Education Level of Teachers............................................................................................................24
Table 6: Educational Level of Teachers....................................................................................................24
4.3.2 Education Level of Students.............................................................................................................24
Table 7: Forms of Educational Level of Students......................................................................................25
4.3.3 Regional Educational Officer Educational Level..............................................................................25
4.4 The Causes on Failure of English Speaking Policy to Students in Tanzania Secondary School..........25
4.4.1 Poor Foundation of English Speaking from Primary School............................................................26

vii
Table 8: Poor Foundation of English Speaking from Primary School.......................................................26
Table 9: Negative Aptitude for Students towards English Speaking Language.........................................27
Table 10: Lack of Teaching and Learning Aids.........................................................................................28
Table 11: Poor Implementation of English Speaking Policy.....................................................................29
Table 12: Low Motivation to Students and English Teachers....................................................................30
Table 13: Incompetence of some English Teachers...................................................................................31
4.4.7 Poor Cooperation among the Staff Members....................................................................................32
Table 14: Poor Cooperation among the Staff Members.............................................................................32
4.5 The Effects of Failure of English Speaking Policy in Tanzania Secondary Schools............................33
Table 15: The Medium of Instruction and Communication become both Kiswahili and English..............33
Table 16: Miscommunication between Teachers and Students..................................................................34
Table 17: Poor Academic Performance.....................................................................................................35
Table 18: Failure to Express Oneself.........................................................................................................36
Table 18: Lack of English Vocabularies....................................................................................................37
4.6 The Solutions on the Failure of English Speaking Policy to the Students in Secondary Schools.........38
Table 19: The Teachers should Establish English Speaking Competition Programs.................................38
Table 20: The Inaction and Implementation of the Strictly Laws on English Speaking Policy.................39
Table 21: Intensive Training of English Teachers.....................................................................................40
Table 22: Provision of Motivation to the Students and English Teachers..................................................41
Table 23: The Teachers should be the Role Model of English Speakers..................................................42
CHAPTER FIVE.......................................................................................................................................44
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................................44
5.1 Introduction.........................................................................................................................................44
5.2 Summary of the Study.........................................................................................................................44
5.3 Conclusion of the Study.......................................................................................................................45
5.4 Recommendation for further studies....................................................................................................46
5.5 Suggestions for Further Studies...........................................................................................................47
REFERENCES..........................................................................................................................................48
APPENDICES...........................................................................................................................................50
APPENDIX 1: Research Time Schedule...................................................................................................50
APPENDIX II: Research Budget Schedule...............................................................................................51
APPENDEX 3...........................................................................................................................................52

viii
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR STUDENTS.....................................................................................................52
APPENDEX 4...........................................................................................................................................53
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR TEACHERS.....................................................................................................53
APPENDEX 5...........................................................................................................................................54
INTERVIEW FOR EDUCATION OFFICER...........................................................................................54

ix
CHAPTER ONE

1.1 Introduction

This chapter dealt with the background of the study, statement of the study, significance of the

study, objective of the study, research questions, limitation of the study, scope of the study,

conceptual frame work and definition of the key terms

1.2 Background of the Study

Tanzania is considered as an example of a country that has a sound linguistic policy, with the

elevation of an African language, Swahili, to a national and official language. This has been

achieved despite the existence of about 157 other local languages. Missionaries and successive

Germans and British colonial administrators laid the foundation for the use of the Swahili as the

official language and LOI (Whitely, 1969). Since independence in 1961, both English and

Swahili have remained the official language and LOI in primary education and English is that in

secondary and post secondary education (United Republic of Tanzania 1995). There is strong

cultural, historical and nationalistic support of the use of Swahili as LOI. However English is

increasingly used as a language of instruction in pre-primary school and private primary schools.

This research argues that there are contradiction between policies and implementation regarding

LOI in primary education that the government needs to resolve.

During the 19th century, Christian missionaries introduced the first western type school in what

was to be Tanganyika. The church mission society (CMC) established an educational centre at

Mpwapwa in1876. Thereafter, various denominations built other schools, but adopted various

LOI. The united mission of central Africa (UMCA), CMS and Holy Ghost Fathers used Swahili

1
but others such as the white farther and London mission society (LMS), used vernaculars

(Gottneid, 1976).

German did not encourage the teaching of their language in Tanganyika. Consequently few

schools were permitted to teach German instead the colonial administration (1887-1918)

encouraged the use of Kiswahili as official language in local administration (Gottneid, 1976) and

adopted is as the LOI in primary education (Whiteley, 1969).

From 1919 to 1961, the British colonial administration maintained Swahili as the LOI in the first

four years of primary school education for the Africans. At a gradual transition to English-

medium instruction took place in the fifth years, and the English become the sole LOI from the

six three years through secondary and post secondary level. Swahili remained as a compulsory

subject in primary education and in the first four years of secondary education.

In the five year plan of Tanzania (1969-74) was continued to use English as a medium at

secondary and tertiary levels of education was deemed unsatisfactory. The move to Kiswahili as

the medium of instruction in primary schools was thought to be only part of a larger plan to

implement the use of Kiswahili as the medium of instruction throughout the education system. In

1969 the Ministry of National Education sent a circular to all Headmasters and Headmistresses

of all secondary schools outlining the plan for the gradual introduction of Kiswahili as the

medium of instruction. According to Bhaiji (1976) secondary school teachers also fevered a shift

to Kiswahili as a medium of instruction. The ministry’s circular suggested that political

education “siasa” should be taught in Kiswahili from the school-year 1969/1970, domestic

science from the school-year 1970/1971, History, Geography, Biology, Agriculture and

Mathematics from 1971/1972(Bhaiji, 1976:112). Bhaiji 1976 argues that at this time curriculum

2
developers had already started to translate and compile all the technical and scientific terms of

school subjects. Some schools had already received a booklet on Mathematical terms in

Kiswahili. Palome (1979) claims that the initial plan was for Kiswahili to become a medium of

instruction in all subjects in form one and two by 1973. The teaching of political education-siasa-

through the medium of Kiswahili was introduced, but then the reform stopped. A study

commissioned by the national Kiswahili council showed that secondary school students had great

difficulties learning the subjects taught in school because the medium of instruction-English-

represented a great barrier (Matteru and Mlama, 1978). The study argued for the shift into

Kiswahili both at secondary and tertiary levels of education.

At the end 1980 the President of Tanzania Mwalimu Nyerere, appointed a presidential

commission on education to review the entire education system. He made Mr. J. Makweta the

chair of the commission. The Makweta-commision presented its report to the president in

February 1982. The recommendations on the medium of instruction more than refueled the

expectations by actual setting a date for a change from English to Kiswahili. In January 1985 the

first year of secondary school. I.e. Form one was to start using Kiswahili and in 1991 the

university was going to starting through the medium of Kiswahili. However, this

recommendation was deleted from the official report published in 1984 (Rubagumya, 1991).

In the years 1969 to 1983 Tanzania educators where waiting and preparing for the shift to

Kiswahili as the medium of instruction in secondary and later also university education, but in

1983 “The Government quite unexpectedly south to turn the tide” (Lwaitama and Rugemalira,

1988:2). In August 1983 the minister of education Mr. Makweta was quoted in the press

(UHURU, 1983) as saying that the expected change of medium was not going to take place. This

must have been a statement that was difficult for Education Minister Makweta to make. He had

3
himself chaired the commission, which had suggested the change of the medium of instruction in

secondary school and tertiary education from English to Kiswahili.

The official language in education policy that is currently being followed in Tanzania is the one

led down in Education and Training Policy (MoE, 1995) which states;

 The medium of instruction in pre-primary schools shall be Kiswahili, and English shall

be a compulsory subject (:35).

 The medium of instruction in primary schools shall be Kiswahili and English shall be

compulsory subject (:39)

Also the language of instructions that is being followed in Tanzania has made by the United

Republic of Tanzania (1995&1997) which states:

 English shall be a compulsory subject in pre primary and secondary education levels and

shall be encouraged in high education. In addition the teaching of English shall be

strengthened (URT, 1997:2).

 A special program to enable the use of Swahili as a medium of instruction in education

and training at all levels shall be designed and implemented (URT, 1997:3).

Several contradictions between language policy and actual implementation of LoI are evident

from the preceding paragraphs. First while government statements maintain that Swahili is the

LoI of primary education, English has been legalized as the LoI in private primary schools

although the majority of students in English-medium schools are Tanzanians. Secondly, the

Ministry of Education and Vocational Training offers an English version of the primary school

syllabus for use in English-medium schools. During a survey of 28 private English-medium

primary schools, Mbise and Masoud (1999) found that 18 used the English version of the

4
syllabus, either alone or in combination with other syllabi. Government primary schools use the

Swahili version of the syllabus. Thirdly, since 2000, the government also administers the English

version of the National Primary School Leaving Examination in English-medium schools,

unlikely in the past when the examination was only provided in Swahili. Also in government

documents states: the medium of instruction in primary schools shall be Swahili, and English

shall be a compulsory subject (URT, 1995:39), however the government had already legalized

English as LoI in private primary schools in 1992. Although a presidential commission

recommended the use of Swahili as LoI at all levels of education (URT, 1984), but in reality the

government has not adopted this recommendation and has not therefore been implemented.

Swahili has remained the major LoI of primary education while English is also increasingly used

as LoI, mainly in private primary schools.

1.3 Statement of the Study

Tanzania has made various ways so as every student has a competence and performance skills of

speaking English in secondary schools. Such ways are like; the medium of instruction in

secondary school shall continue to be English except for the teaching of other approved

languages and Kiswahili shall be a compulsory subject up to ordinary level (MoE, 1995). Also

English shall be a compulsory subject in preprimary, primary and secondary education levels and

shall be encouraged in high education (URT, 1997). Despite of different efforts made by

government many students still unable to use English as a medium of instruction at school.

Therefore the aim of this study will be to investigate on the failure of English speaking policy to

students in Tanzania Secondary schools Mtwara Municipality specifically.

5
1.4 Objectives of the Study

1.4.1 General Objective of the Study

The main objective of the study was to investigate on the failure of English speaking policy to

students in Tanzania secondary schools.

1.4.2 Specific Objectives of the Study

i. To find out the causes of the failure of English speaking policy in secondary schools

ii. To identify the effects of failure of English speaking policy secondary schools

iii. To suggest out possible ways to overcome the failure of English speaking policy in

secondary schools

1.5 Research Questions

i. What are the causes of failure of English speaking policy in secondary schools?

ii. What are the effects of failure of English speaking policy in secondary school?

iii. What are the possible ways to overcome the failure of English speaking policy in

secondary schools?

1.6 Significances of the Study

i. The study stated the reasons as to why there is failure in English speaking policy in

secondary schools

ii. The research enabled other researchers to explore more about the effects that face

students on English speaking policy in secondary schools.

iii. The study was useful in suggesting measures to be taken to overcome the failure of

English speaking policy in secondary schools

6
1.7 Scope of the Study

The study was conducted in Mtwara Mikindani Municipality as a case study. Therefore the study

dealt on the failure of English speaking policy from January 2015 to February 2016 in which all

process of data collection, data analysis and report writing, report submission and report

presentation was accomplished by involving four secondary schools which were Rahaleo.

Mtwara Sisters, Shangani and Umoja Secondary Schools.

1.8 Limitation of the Study

The study focused on the failure of English speaking policy to students in Tanzania secondary

schools, case study was Mtwara Municipality with various limitations as follows.

 Fund from loan board for the research was not enough due to the use of various activities

such as downloading materials from internet, printing, buying books and transportation

coast to the respondents to collect data for information.

 Time was not enough because during the research work, the courses were continuing on;

therefore the researcher participated the courses and conducts a research at the same time.

 Not all respondents were able to respond.

1.9 Definition of Key Terms

Language policy refers to what a government does either officially through legislation, court

decisions or policy to determine how a languages are used, cultivate language skills needed to

meet national priorities or to establish the rights of individual or groups to use and maintained

languages.

Speaking refers to the delivery of language through the mouth.

7
1.10 Conceptual Framework

This is a theoretical structure of assumptions, principles and rules that hold together the ideas

comprise a broad concept. It is a researcher’s idea on how the research problem has been

explored. Consider the following conceptual frame work bellow

Figure1: conceptual framework

The failure of English speaking policy to students in Tanzania secondary schools

CAUSE EFFEC SOLUTIO


S TS NS

-Lack of -Incompetence and -Teachers seminars


vocabularies poor performance on teaching English
-poor motivation -poor expansion of -Provide enough
individual skills teaching and learning
-poor teaching
-Poor national materials
and learning
techniques educational level -Enacting and
Poor exams implementing
-insufficient
performance English speaking law
English teaching
and learning
materials

Source: Research 2015

From figure above, Independent variable of the failure of English speaking policy to students in

Tanzania secondary Schools while Dependent variable are causes, effects and solutions

8
CHAPTER TWO

LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Introduction

This chapter aimed at reviewing various Theoretical Literatures, Empirical Literatures, Related

literatures and finally research gap to see the relevance of the study at hand. It is literatures that

form the basis upon which a research is built. Therefore this chapter investigated the historical

overviews of the study with regard to some scholars and researchers.

2.2 Theoretical Literature

Accommodation theory delivered from the research of Giles (1979) associates into the intergroup

use of language in multilingual communities. He argues that motivation is the primary

determinant of social language proficiency. He considers the level of motivation to be a reflex of

how individual learners defines themselves in ethnic term and he introduces change which occur

in L2 that is upward convergent due to the motivation and down ward divergence due to negative

motivation, therefore learners can acquire language depending on how they are accommodated

by their teachers in their learning environment. The learning of second language is faced with

different obstacle or limitations. This is supported by Nida (1957) that there are principles

reasons to why it is difficult to learn a foreign language in the class that includes; classes are too

large, secondly, that foreign language is not used whereby in some instance the teacher is not

able to speak the language fluently, thirdly, the text books are poorly designed and uninteresting

to both teachers and students. The fourth obstacles a grammar which is taught as the easy way

out that is faced with the traditional demands.

9
The monitor model, consists of five hypothesis and make reference to a number of other factors

which influence second language acquisition and relate the central hypothesis such that are the

acquisition learning hypotheses, natural order hypotheses monitor and input effective filter this

lead to the causative variable such as aptitude, individual differences, ages and learning

environment. Piper (1998) states that environmental factors are potentially influence language

learning but the researcher identified four broad categories of factors that are believed to have a

significant impact. These environmental factors includes the availability of concrete or visible

referent for easier understanding, the availability of the target language models where by this has

to do with the source of the language the learners encounters, the third is the learners role in

communication where by the quality of language learning is also affected that means of

communication in which the learners is most frequently engaged and the final factor is the

naturalness of the environmental in which learners are exposed.

2.3 Empirical Literature

Clement and Smythen, (1977) state learner’s attitude and motivation in language learning is

affected by his or her own attitude towards learning language. The relationship between

motivation and attitude have been considered as the price concern in language learning that is to

say attitude contributes to either complicity or easier on learning second language.

In the report Tanzania education system for 21st century it is argued that Kiswahili is not ready to

be used as a medium of instruction. As a matter of policy, Kiswahili should be a medium of

instruction at the pre primary and primary school levels. However, English should continue to be

strengthened at primary school level and used as a medium of instruction in post primary

medium of instruction until such a time when Kiswahili is ready to be the dominate medium of

10
instruction ( United Republic of Tanzania, 1993:23). Therefore the students fail to speak at

secondary schools due to poor foundation from pre primary and primary school.

Sababu za wanafunzi kutofaulu somo la kiingereza ni nyingi, kwanza ni waalimu kushinwdwa

kuhudhuria vipindi darasani. Kutohudhuria masomo kunasababishwa na uhaba wa waalimu

unaozikabili shule nyingi hasa za vijijini. Utakuta mwalimu amepangiwa kufundisha vipindi

vingi na hivyo kushindwa kuhudhuria vipindi vingine kutokana na uchovu ama kubanwa.

Mwalimu akiwa na vipindi vingi hawezi kufundisha kwa umakini na kufuatilia maendeleo ya

kila mwanafunzi. Vilevile si rahisi kwa mwalimu kusahihisha madaftari ya wanafunzi ya

madarasa yote anayofundisha. Pili, wazazi kutofuatilia walichojifunza watoto wao shulueni pia

kunasababisha matokeo mabaya. Ni jukumu la wazazi kukagua madaftari ya watoto wao na

kuwasaidia kimasomo pindi wanapokuwa nyumbani. Tatu, ukali wa waalimu shuleni pamoja na

adhabu ya viboko hujenga hofu kwa wanafunzi. Wanakuwa waoga kuuliza maswali, kutoa hoja

na hata kushiriki katika mijadala inayowapa ujasiri wa kuongea mbele za watu lugha ya

kiingereza (Haki Elimu, 2005).

2.4 Literature Review

A more recent study has been carried by Clement and Knizenier (1985) in the Turkish EFL

context. The motive of this study arose from the complaints raised by learners, teachers

administrates and parents about why most of the Turkish EFL cannot attain the desired levels of

proficiency in English. Therefore, he conducted the study to find out the relationship between

language attitude and language learning which is a missing point of discussion of the problem of

teaching English in Turkey. More specifically, Harahan tried to identify the interlaced

relationship among language attitudes, the starting age of language learning. There are different

methods used for inquiry previous study on language attitude. The finding indicated that

11
although the students were exposed to English in a school environment more frequently than

other students at public schools, they had only mildly positive attitudes; especially female

students and higher rate. In addition the subject recognized the importance of English language

but interestingly did not reveal higher level orientation towards learning the language. On the

other hand, the results reveal that the subject had mildly positive attitude towards the English

based culture but they were not tolerant to Turkish people speaking English among themselves.

In Japan, learners’ attitudes and motivation towards the English language were also of concern

for many researchers. One of the most relevant studies was that of Benson (1991) who surveyed

over 300 freshmen to assess their motivation towards learning English

Researchers suggest that teachers’ attitude may be concerned about(a) chronic lack of time to

address Ells’ unique classroom needs (Young’s, 1999), (b) perceived intensification of teachers

workloads when ELLs are enrolled in mainstream classes (Bandura, 1989), and (c) feeling of

vocational inadequate to work with ELL (Bell, 1999). In terms of the impacts of inclusion on the

classroom learning environment, teachers’ are concerned about the possibility that Ells will slow

the class progression through the curriculum or result in iniquities in educational opportunities

for all students (Howitiz, et all, 1986). Finally some evidence of subject-area teachers’ attitudes

and perceptions of ELLs is present in research, including the reluctance to work with the low

proficiency ELLs, misconception about the second language acquisition (Clement, et all, 1977),

and assumptions positives and negatives about the race and ethnicity of ELLs (Bell, 1996).

Attitudes towards inclusion according to the researcher found that several qualitative studies

exploring schooling experiences of ELLs have alluded to mainstream teacher’s attitude toward

ELL inclusion in Tanzania perspective. Teachers in those studies were portrayed as holding

12
negative, unwilling attitudes (Bell, 1999), as well as positive, welcoming attitude (Clement and

Knizenier, 1985). In general, teachers in those studies held ambivalent or unwelcoming attitudes.

Although there were notable exceptions, the determining welcoming or unwelcoming nature of

teachers’ attitudes, researchers suggested a host of factors that could be influential. The factor

fall into three categories (a) teachers’ perception on the impacts of ELL inclusion on themselves,

(b) impacts of inclusion on the learning environment, and (c) teachers aptitudes and perception

of ELLs.

Many English learners brought to classroom particularly cultural orientations that affected how

the perceived and interacted with each other in the classroom. In Tanzania perspective many

students and teachers have different cultures which influenced negative attitudes toward English

language since every one needed to maintain and perceive his or her own culture which increases

the difficult in English language learning and in most cases some parents do not encourage their

children to learn English language thinking that their children adopt new culture, many well to

do parents took their children to the neighboring countries which parents thought that their

children got competence in both spoken and written English

Jeremy (2005) shows that English use have grown in the last few decades that in 1985 estimated

that there were between 320and 380 million people speaking English as first language and

anywhere between 250 and 380 million speaker of English as second language but he had

predicted that the balance might change.

Bell, (1999) argues strongly against the view that native speakers are irrelevant or that native

speakers varieties have little prestige and he went further saying that there is more language use

than mere international intelligibility, he says that the phenomena that people are making use of

13
their imperfect second language repertoire to communicate more or less effective is interesting

and revealing but does not have any implication for learning.

According to Ellis (1985) (SLA) is not uniform and predictable phenomena. There is single way

which learners acquire knowledge of second language. (SLA) is the product of many factors

pertaining to learners in one hand and the learning situation in the other hands. It is importance

therefore to start by recognizing the complicity and the diversity that result for the interaction of

these two sets of the factors. According to him, he categorizes learners in different categories to

learn a second language in different ways. There has been no shortage of theorizing about (SLA).

2.5 Gap of Knowledge

Despite of the research done in Europe by Clement (1977) argues that Learners’ attitude and

motivation in language learning is affected by his or her own attitude towards learning language.

Therefore, this study dealt with the failure of English speaking policy to students in Tanzania

secondary schools Mtwara Mikindani Municipality as a case study by identifying the causes and

effects of the failure of policy and suggests the possible solutions to be taken to overcome the

problem.

14
CHAPTER THREE

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3.1 Introduction

This chapter dealt with Research methodology. The chapter however described the research

approach, research design, area of the study, sampling techniques, data collection techniques,

data analysis and presentation, finally references.

3.2 Research Approach

Research approach is the arrangement of a condition for collection and analysis of data in a

manner that aims to combine the relevance to the research purpose with economy in procedure

(Kothari, 2004: 3). In short are ways of data collection. Mixed approach was used during the data

collection. Both Qualitative and Quantitative data collection methods were used during data

collection. Quantitative data are data collected in numbers and Qualitative data are data

presented in words.

3.3 Research Design

Research design is the arrangement of condition for collection and analysis of data in manner

that aimed to combine relevance to research purpose with economy in procedure (Kothari, 2004).

In fact the research design is the conceptual structure within which research is conducted; it

constitutes the blueprint for the collection, measurement and analysis of data. This study used

case study design because enabled researcher to investigate on the failure of English speaking

policy to students in Tanzania secondary schools especially Mtwara Mikindani Municipality.

15
3.4 Area of Study

This research was conducted in Mtwara region largely in Mtwara Mikindani Municipality.

Mtwara region is one among regions of Tanzania Mainland. It is the southernmost region. It lies

between longitudes 38° and 40° 30" east of Greenwich. It is also situated between latitudes 10°

05" and 11° 25" south of the Equator. It borders Lindi region to the north, the Indian Ocean to

the east and separated by the Ruvuma River from Mozambique in the south. To the west it

borders Ruvuma region. The region occupies 16,720 sq. kms or 1.9% of Tanzania Mainland land

area of 885,987 sq. kms. It is the second smallest region after Kilimanjaro (Malochon, N. 1997).

3.5 Sampling Techniques

Sampling is the acquisition of the information about a relative small part of a large group

inferential generalization about the large group (Rice 2003: 233). The researcher used simple

random sampling and purposive sampling.

3.5.1 Simple Random Sampling

A sample refers to the small portion of population selected for the observation and analysis

(Bandura, 1989). Also it is the sampling techniques which allow each individual to have equal

chance of being selected to participate in the study. The sampling technique used randomly to 12

students and 12 teachers in order to ensure equal participation of the respondents from the entire

population of the study.

3.5.2 Purposive Sampling

In this sampling method, the research purposively targets a group of people believed to be

reliable for the study (Kombo and Tromp, 2006:82). Purposive sampling is based on researcher’s

knowledge and experience in identifying the right people who know about the subject matter. It

16
can be also used to locate area of study which the researcher according to the nature of the topic

and his experience think they will be for data collection process. Purposive sampling method

applied to get 1 educational officer who gave the correct information on the study.

3.6 Sample Size

In this study the researcher used simple random sampling and purposive sampling. In these

methods of sampling the researcher had the total population of twenty five (25) respondents.

There are twelve (12) teachers, twelve (12) students and one (1) regional educational officer

which make total of 25 respondents.

Table 1: Sample Size of the Respondents

Respondents Number Percentage (%)

Educational officer 1 4%

Teachers 12 48%

Students 12 48%

Total 25 100%

Sources: Field Data, 2016

3.7 Data Collection Techniques

Data are facts and other relevant materials serving as the bases for studying and analysis Hornby

(2006:371) argued that Data are facts or information, especially when examined and used to find

out or to make out decisions. Therefore the following techniques were used in collecting data

that are Questionnaire and interview.

17
3.7.1 Interview

This is a form of data collection in which questions are asked orally and subject’s responses are

recorded. The type of interview used in order to collect data which is unstructured interview. In

unstructured interview the Researcher prepared a list of questions which were recorded so as to

get appropriate and systematic data about the factors on failure of English speaking policy to

students in Tanzania secondary schools. The method was applied to Regional Educational

Officer.

3.7.2 Questionnaire

Questionnaire is a written document containing question that are used to obtain subjects,

perspectives, attitudes, values, beliefs and other traits. Both opened form and closed form were

used. Closed forms and Open forms questions were used to seek the respondent’s ideas about

factors for the failure of English speaking policy to students in Tanzania secondary schools.

These were used to teachers and students.

3.8 Data Analysis and Presentation

Data analysis and presentation were done after the completion of the data collection. The data in

this study were analyzed by using qualitative and quantitative in order to obtain the required

information concerning with failure of English speaking policy to students in Tanzania

secondary schools. The researcher used Qualitative method by using description of data in the

percentage and the quantitative accompanied with tables.

18
CHAPTER FOUR

DATA ANALYSIS, PRESENTATION AND INTERPRETATION

4.1 Introduction

In this chapter, the researcher shows how the data obtained from the field have been analyzed,

presented and interpreted. The data that were gathered from the field have been analyzed in form

of tables and percentages so as to make findings more understandable. The qualitative data have

been described by statements and descriptions while the quantitative data have been analyzed by

using tables to demonstrate the reality situation in the field. The research findings have been

presented in both of quantitative and statement means which will enable the reader to understand

the findings. In this study, a researcher used two methods of data collection and these are

Questionnaires for students and teachers whereby Interview used for the regional educational

officer. A researcher used teachers, students and regional educational officer as key respondents

in helping a researcher to collect information. These respondents were obtained through various

methods which are; randomly sampling and purposive sampling. Randomly sampling was used

to obtain the teachers and students and purposive sampling method was used for the educational

officer. The main objective of the study was to investigate the failure of English speaking policy

to students in Tanzania secondary schools Mtwara Mikindani Municipality as the case study.

The data were obtained through the specific objectives which were: - to find out the causes on

failure of English speaking policy to students in secondary schools; to find out the effects on the

failure of English speaking policy to students in secondary schools and finally was to find out the

solutions toward the effects of the failure of English speaking policy to students in secondary

schools.

19
4.1 Background Information of Respondents

This part explains the background information of the respondents who were involved in the

study; the study involved different respondents vary in term of age, sex and education status

including the teachers, students and educational officer of Mtwara Mikindani Municipality.

4.1.1 The Age of the Respondents

The study included the age of respondents such as the teachers, students and educational officer

who vary in term of age in investigating the failure of English speaking policy to students in

Tanzania secondary schools

4.1.2 The Age of Teachers

The study used teachers who vary in terms of age, ranged from the lowest to the highest age. The

age of teachers who participated in the study can be summarized as follows;

Table 2: The Age of Teachers

Respondents Age Frequencies Percentages

25-30 4 33.3%

Teachers 35-40 4 33.3%

45-50 4 33.3%

Total 12 100%

Source: Field Data 2016

The data in the table above represent the age of the teachers who were involved in the study

their age varied from one to another that the age of the respondents ranged from 25 up to 30 were

20
4 respondents equals to 33.3%, 35 up to 40 were 4 respondents which is equals to 33.3% also 45

up to 50 were 4 respondents equals to 33.3% of respondents who participated in the field of

study on the failure of English speaking policy to students in Tanzania secondary schools.

4.1.3 The Age of the Students

This research finding used students who vary in terms of age, ranged from the lowest to the

highest age. The age of students who participated in the study can be summarized as follows;

Table 3 The Age of Students

Respondents Age Frequencies Percentages

14-16 4 33.3%

Heads of colleges 17-19 4 33.3%

20-21 4 33.3%

Total 12 100

Source: Field Data 2016

The data in the table represent the age of the students who were involved in the study their age

varied from one another, that the age of the respondents ranged from 14 up to 16 were 4

respondents equals to 33.3%, 17 up to 19 were 4 respondents which is equals to 33.3% also 20

up to 21 were 4 respondents equals to 33.3% of respondents who participated in the field of

study on the failure of English speaking policy to students in Tanzania secondary schools.

21
4.1.4 The Age of the Regional Educational Officer

The researcher used educational officer who participated in the study about failure of English

speaking policy to students in Tanzania secondary schools, whose age is 50 years old.

4.2 Sex of Respondents

According to the finding obtained from the field, the researcher used respondents of both female

and male groups whereby both sex participated in the study with the researcher in giving out the

information that were demanded in this study as portrayed in the table below;

4.2.1 Sex of Students

The researcher used students who participated on the study about failure of English speaking

policy to students in Tanzania secondary schools, whereby 6 were male and 6 were female as

explained in the table bellow;

Table 4: Sex of Students

Respondent Sex Frequencies Percentage

Male 6 50%

Students Female 6 50%

Total 12 100%

Source: Field Data 2016

The table explains sex of students whereby 6 respondents’ equals to 50% were males and 6

respondents’ equals to 50% were females who participated on the failure of English speaking

policy to students in Tanzania secondary schools.

22
4.2.2 Sex of Teachers

The researcher used teachers who participated on the study about failure of English speaking

policy to students in Tanzania secondary schools, whereby 6 were males and 6 were females as

explained in the table bellow;

Table 5: Sex of Teachers

Respondent Sex Frequencies Percentage

Male 6 50%

Students Female 6 50%

Total 12 100%

Source: Field Data 2016

The table above shows the sex of teachers whereby 6 respondents equals to 50% were males and

6 respondents equals to 50% were females who participated in the field by giving more

information on the failure of English speaking policy to students in Tanzania secondary schools.

4.2.3 Sex of Regional Educational

The researcher used educational officer who participated on the study about failure of English

speaking policy to students in Tanzania secondary schools, whose sex is male

4.3. Education Level of Respondents

The study used respondents with different level of education based on categories of respondents

who participated in this research study this included education level of teachers, students and

regional educational officer as explained well below;

23
4.3.1 Education Level of Teachers

The number of teachers who responded the questionnaire were 12 respondents every one having

different level of education. The information is summarized in the table as follows;

Table 6: Educational Level of Teachers

Respondents Education level Frequencies Percentage

Diploma 6 50%

Teachers Degree 6 50%

Total 12 100%

Source: Field Data 2016

The table above shows the educational level of teachers whereby 6 were diploma holders equals

to 50% and 6 respondents were degree holders 50% who participated on the failure of English

speaking policy to students in Tanzania secondary schools.

4.3.2 Education Level of Students

The researcher used students in the field of study with different forms of educational level in

order to determine the failure of English speaking policy to students in Tanzania secondary

schools. The researcher summarized the forms of educational levels of students as shown in the

table below as follows;

24
Table 7: Forms of Educational Level of Students

Respondent Educational level Frequencies Percentage

Form iii 6 50%

Students Form iv 6 50%

Total 12 100%

Source: Field Data 2016

From the information in table above represents the forms of educational level of students who

responded the question on the failure of English speaking policy to students in Tanzania

secondary schools, whereby 6 students equivalent to 50% were form iii and 6 students equals to

50% were form iv secondary school students. The researcher sued these two forms in order to

minimize the number of respondents because the research was dealing on ordinary level

secondary schools

4.3.3 Regional Educational Officer Educational Level

The researcher used the education officer in the field of study in order to determine the failure of

English speaking policy to students in Tanzania secondary schools. The respondent was masters

of educational management and planning holder.

4.4 The Causes on Failure of English Speaking Policy to Students in Tanzania Secondary

School.

This part is dealing with descriptions of the causes on failure of English speaking policy to

students in Tanzania secondary school. These data were obtained with regard to the research

question that asks that what are the causes on failure of English speaking policy to students in

25
Tanzania secondary school?, therefore the question guided a researcher in getting information as

follows

4.4.1 Poor Foundation of English Speaking from Primary School

Teachers, students and educational officer used by a researcher as respondents in order to get

vivid information concerning the causes on failure of English speaking policy to students in

Tanzania secondary school which is poor foundation of English speaking from primary school as

explained in the table bellow;

Table 8: Poor Foundation of English Speaking from Primary School

Respondents Frequency Percentage

Students 3 37.5%

Teachers 4 50%

Educational officer 1 12.5%

Total 8 100%

Source: Field research 2016

During the data collection through questionnaire and interview 3 respondents who were37.5%

were students, 4 teachers who were 50% were teachers and 1 respondent was educational officer

equal to 12.5 % said that the causes of failure in English speaking policy to students in secondary

schools is poor foundation of English speaking from primary levels were they lack conducive

learning and studying environments that can help to get knowledge and skills of English

speaking. This makes the students fail to speak English in secondary schools. Therefore it can be

26
concluded that poor foundation of English speaking from primary level is the causative toward

the failure of English speaking policy to students in secondary schools.

4.4.2 Negative Aptitude for Students towards English Speaking Language

Teachers, students and educational officer used by a researcher as respondents in order to get

vivid information concerning the causes on failure of English speaking policy to students in

Tanzania secondary schools which is negative aptitude for students towards English speaking

language as explained in the table bellow;

Table 9: Negative Aptitude for Students towards English Speaking Language

Respondents Frequency Percentage

Students 5 50%

Teachers 4 40%

Educational officer 1 10%

Total 10 100%

Source: Field research 2016

According to the data collected in the field through questionnaire and interview 5 respondents

who were 50% were students, 4 respondents who were 40% were teachers and 1 respondent who

was 10% was educational officer commented that negative attitude for students towards English

speaking that English is important to students who specialize in arts subjects and not for science

subject students. Clement and Smythen (1977) said that Learners’ attitude and motivation in

language learning is affected by their own attitude towards learning language. Therefore this

27
shows that if the students have negative attitude to language they always fail to speak English

language in the school campus

4.4.3 Lack of Teaching and Learning Aids

Teachers, students and educational officer used by a researcher as respondents in order to get

vivid information concerning the causes on failure of English speaking policy to students in

Tanzania secondary schools said that lack of teaching and learning aids as explained in the table

bellow;

Table 10: Lack of Teaching and Learning Aids

Respondents Frequency Percentage

Students 12 48%

Teachers 12 48%

Educational officer 1 4%

Total 25 100%

Source: Field research 2016

According to the data collected in the field through questionnaire and interview show that 12

respondents who were 48% were students, 12 respondents who were 48% were teachers and 1

respondent who was 4% was regional educational officer, commented that the causes of failure

of English speaking policy to students in secondary schools is lack of teaching and learning aids

such as text books, short story books and other supplementary materials that inspire the readers

on how to speak English language as the medium of communication. This hinders the process of

28
teaching and learning English such that, teachers loose competence and morale and teaching

English language in secondary schools.

4.4.4 Poor Implementation of English Speaking Policy

Teachers, students and educational officer used by a researcher as respondents in order to get

vivid information concerning the causes on failure of English speaking policy to students in

Tanzania secondary schools stated that poor implementation of English speaking policy as

explained in the table bellow;

Table 11: Poor Implementation of English Speaking Policy

Respondents Frequency Percentage

Students 12 48%

Teachers 12 48%

Educational officer 1 4%

Total 25 100%

Source: Field research 2016

According to the data collected in the field through questionnaire and interview show that 12

respondents who formed 48% were students, 12 respondents who were 48% were teachers and 1

respondent who was 4% was regional educational officer said that poor implementation of

English language policy teachers that enacted by schools led to failure of English speaking

policy to student s in secondary schools. This is due to the fact that some schools leadership is

very weak in the sense that teachers are unable to enact and implement strictly laws. Generally

29
poor implementation of English speaking policy by teachers led to failure of English speaking to

students in schools.

4.4.5 Low Motivation to Students and English Teachers

Teachers, students and educational officer used by a researcher as respondents in order to get

vivid information concerning the causes on failure of English speaking policy to students in

Tanzania secondary schools that is low motivation to students and English teachers as explained

in the table bellow;

Table 12: Low Motivation to Students and English Teachers

Respondents Frequency Percentage

Students 6 50%

Teachers 5 41.7%

Educational officer 1 8.3%

Total 12 100%

Source: Field research 2016

The data collected through questionnaire and interview show that 6 respondents who were 50%

were teachers, 5 respondents who were 41.7% were students, and 1 respondent who was 8.3%

was educational officer commented that low motivation to English teachers is the causative of

the failure in English speaking policy to students in secondary schools. This is due to the fact that

English teachers need to use alternative effort in teaching English speaking skills. This cause

30
teacher fail to teach English speaking skills there after students fail to speak English finally

results to the failure of English speaking policy to students in secondary schools

4.4.6 Incompetence of some English Teachers

Teachers, students and educational officer used by a researcher as respondents in order to get

vivid information concerning the causes on failure of English speaking policy to students in

Tanzania secondary schools which can be incompetence of some English teachers as explained

in the table bellow;

Table 13: Incompetence of some English Teachers

Respondents Frequency Percentage

Students 5 50%

Teachers 4 40%

Educational officer 1 10%

Total 10 100%

Source: Field research 2016

According to the data collected in the field through questionnaire and interview 5 respondents

who were 50% were students, 4 respondents who were 40% were teachers and 1 respondent who

was 10% was educational officer said that incompetence of some English teachers is a cause on

failure of English speaking policy to students in Tanzania secondary school Also this is

supported by Nida ( 1957) there are reasons to why it is difficult to learn a foreign language in

the classes that foreign language is not used intensively also in some instances teachers are not

31
able to speak English language fluently. Generally this makes teachers fail to impart knowledge

and skills concerning English speaking to students in secondary schools.

4.4.7 Poor Cooperation among the Staff Members

Teachers, students and educational officer used by a researcher as respondents in order to get

vivid information concerning the causes on failure of English speaking policy to students in

Tanzania secondary schools said that poor cooperation among the staff members as explained in

the table bellow;

Table 14: Poor Cooperation among the Staff Members

Respondents Frequency Percentage

Teachers 6 50%

Students 5 41.7%

Educational officer 1 8.3%

Total 12 100%

Source: Field research 2016

The data collected through questionnaire and interview show that 6 respondents who were 50%

were teachers, 5 respondents who were 41.7% were students, and 1 respondent who was 8.3%

was educational officer commented that poor cooperation among the staff members is a cause on

failure of English speaking policy to students in Tanzania secondary school. This finding

realized that the English subject teachers fail on their implementation of language peaking policy

due to lack of cooperation within the staff members whenever they establish some English

32
progressive programs which will enable the students to get knowledge and skills. Example some

staff members become the first one to break the rules of English speaking in all contexts and

environment such in the offices classrooms and pared session.

4.5 The Effects of Failure of English Speaking Policy in Tanzania Secondary Schools

This part concerns with description of the effects of failure of English speaking policy in

Tanzania secondary schools. These data were obtained with regard to the research question that

asks what are the effects of failure of English speaking policy to students in Tanzania secondary

school? So, this question guided a researcher in getting information as follows;

4.5.1 The Medium of Instruction and Communication becomes both Kiswahili and English

Teachers, students and educational officer used by a researcher as respondents in order to get

vivid information concerning the effects of failure of English speaking policy in Tanzania

secondary schools which is the medium of instruction and communication becomes both

Kiswahili and English as explained in the table bellow;

Table 15: The Medium of Instruction and Communication become both Kiswahili and

English

Respondents Frequency Percentage

Students 12 48%

Teachers 12 48%

Educational officer 1 4%

Total 25 100%

Source: Field research 2016


33
According to the data collected in the field through questionnaire and interview show that 12

respondents who were 48% were students, 12 respondents who were 48% were teachers and 1

respondent who was 4% was regional educational officer, said that the effect of failure in English

speaking policy to students is the use of English and Kiswahili as the medium of instruction

because if the teachers use English fluently as the medium of instruction, the students will fail to

know what was instructed or taught. Therefore the teacher needs to mix both English and

Kiswahili in order to make clear the lesson or instruction concerning the school the school

activities.

4.5.2 Miscommunication between Teachers and Students

Teachers, students and educational officer used by a researcher as respondents in order to get

vivid information concerning the effects of failure of English speaking policy in Tanzania

secondary schools stated that miscommunication between teachers and students as explained in

the table bellow;

Table 16: Miscommunication between Teachers and Students

Respondents Frequency Percentage

Students 5 50%

Teachers 4 40%

Educational officer 1 10%

Total 10 100%

Source: Field research 2016

34
According to the data collected in the field through questionnaire and interview 5 respondents

who formed 50% were students, 4 respondents who were 40% were teachers and 1 respondent

who was 10% was educational officer stated that the effect of failure in English speaking policy

to students in secondary schools is Miscommunication between teachers and students in school

activities such as teaching and learning activities. Therefore when a teacher decides to use

English language only in any activity the students fail to determine what have been said by the

teacher.

4.5.3 Poor Academic Performance

Teachers, students and educational officer used by a researcher as respondents in order to get

vivid information concerning the effects of failure of English speaking policy in Tanzania

secondary schools which is poor performance as explained in the table bellow;

Table 17: Poor Academic Performance

Respondents Frequency Percentage

Students 12 48%

Teachers 12 48%

Educational officer 1 4%

Total 25 100%

Source: Field research 2016

According to the data collected in the field through questionnaire and interview show that 12

respondents who were 48% were students, 12 respondents who were 48% were teachers and 1

35
respondent who was 4% was regional educational officer responded that poor performance

results from the effects of failure of English speaking policy to students in secondary schools in

the sense that the student do not know what have been taught due to the use of English language

only. Therefore the effect of failure of English speaking policy goes directly to poor academic

because all subjects use English language except Kiswahili subject which is unknown to the

majority of students while they are studying themselves.

4.5.4 Failure to Express Oneself

Teachers, students and educational officer used by a researcher as respondents in order to get

vivid information concerning the effects of failure of English speaking policy in Tanzania

secondary schools which can be failure to express oneself as explained in the table bellow;

Table 18: Failure to Express Oneself

Respondents Frequency Percentage

Students 3 37.5%

Teachers 4 50%

Educational officer 1 12.5%

Total 8 100%

Source: Field research 2016

During the data collection through questionnaire and interview focus seen that 3 respondents

who were37.5% were students, 4 teachers who were 50% were teachers and 1 respondent was

educational officer equal to 12.5 % responded that the effect of failure of English speaking

36
policy to students is failure to express oneself. This is in the sense that students lack knowledge

and skills to produce and connect linguistic grammatical sentences that bring about meaningful

ideas. Generally the students lack competence and performance of English language which

enable them to speak confidently and majestically in any concrete environment or context at

school.

4.5.5 Lack of English Vocabularies

Teachers, students and educational officer used by a researcher as respondents in order to get

vivid information concerning the effects of failure of English speaking policy in Tanzania

secondary schools which is lack of English vocabularies as explained in the table bellow;

Table 18: Lack of English Vocabularies

Respondents Frequency Percentage

Students 5 50%

Teachers 4 40%

Educational officer 1 10%

Total 10 100%

Source: Field research 2016

According to the data collected in the field through questionnaire and interview 5 respondents

who were 50% were students, 4 respondents who were 40% were teachers and 1 respondent who

was 10% was educational officer stated that the effect of failure on English speaking policy to

students in secondary schools is lack of English vocabularies to the speakers. The results from

37
the respondents show that most of students are not able to create more vocabularies that help

them to produce the grammatical sentence in their conversation and negotiation in the school

compound.

4.6 The Solutions on the Failure of English Speaking Policy to the Students in Secondary

Schools

This part deals with description of the solutions on the failure of English speaking policy to the

students in secondary schools. These data were obtained with regard to the research question that

asks what the solutions on the failure of English speaking policy to the students in secondary

schools? So, this question guided a researcher in getting information as follows;

4.6.1 The Teachers should Establish English Speaking Competition Programs

Teachers, students and educational officer used by a researcher as respondents in order to get

vivid information concerning the solutions on the failure of English speaking policy to the

students in Tanzania secondary schools whereby teachers should establish English speaking

competition programs as explained in the table bellow;

Table 19: The Teachers should Establish English Speaking Competition Programs

Respondents Frequency Percentage

Students 12 48%

Teachers 12 48%

Educational officer 1 4%

Total 25 100%

Source: Field research 2016

38
According to the data collected in the field through questionnaire and interview show that 12

respondents who were 48% were students, 12 respondents who were 48% were teachers and 1

respondent who was 4% was regional educational officer stated that the teachers should establish

English speaking competition programs such as debates, morning speeches, subject clubs, radio

and television speech presentations and creative writing stories. These competitions should be

guided and supervised by English teachers in collaborating with all staff members. The members

correct the speaking and writing errors and guide students to correct the grammatical use. These

competition programs can be used to enhance the English speaking policy to schools when the

programs are supervised intensively.

4.6.2 Inaction and Implementation of the Strictly Laws on English Speaking Policy

Teachers, students and educational officer used by a researcher as respondents in order to get

vivid information concerning the solutions on the failure of English speaking policy to the

students in Tanzania secondary schools which is to inaction and implementation of the strictly

laws on English speaking policy as explained in the table bellow;

Table 20: The Inaction and Implementation of the Strictly Laws on English Speaking

Policy

Respondents Frequency Percentage

Students 6 50%

Teachers 5 41.7%

Educational officer 1 8.3%

Total 12 100%

Source: Field research 2016

39
The data collected through questionnaire and interview show that 6 respondents who were 50%

were teachers, 5 respondents who were 41.7% were students, and 1 respondent who was 8.3%

was educational officer stated that the solution on the effect of failure in English speaking policy

to students in secondary schools is to enact and implement the restrict law on English speaking

policy. The school should introduce the punishment against those who flout the English speaking

policy measure such as copra punishment in front of other students.

4.6.3 Intensive Training of English Teachers

Teachers, students and educational officer used by a researcher as respondents in order to get

vivid information concerning the solutions on the failure of English speaking policy to the

students in Tanzania secondary schools which is intensive training of English teachers as

explained in the table bellow;

Table 21: Intensive Training of English Teachers

Respondents Frequency Percentage

Teachers 6 50%

Students 5 41.7%

Educational officer 1 8.3%

Total 12 100%

Source: Field research 2016

The data collected through questionnaire and interview show that 6 respondents who were 50%

were teachers, 5 respondents who were 41.7% were students, and 1 respondent who was 8.3%

40
was educational officer stated that the solution on the effect of failure of English speaking policy

to students in secondary schools is to introduce intensive training of English teachers. That mean

English teachers if they are very competent is easy to determine and realize the clear method of

teaching English language as the second language learning. Generally the competent teachers

produce competent students in all aspects of academic including speaking competence onto the

students.

4.6.4 Provision of Motivation to the Students and English Teachers

Teachers, students and educational officer used by a researcher as respondents in order to get

vivid information concerning the solutions on the failure of English speaking policy to the

students in Tanzania secondary schools which is provision of motivation to the students and

English teachers as explained in the table bellow;

Table 22: Provision of Motivation to the Students and English Teachers

Respondents Frequencies Percentage

Students 5 50%

Teachers 4 40%

Educational officer 1 10%

Total 10 100%

Source: Field research 2016

According to the data collected in the field through questionnaire and interview 5 respondents

who were 50% were students, 4 respondents who were 40% were teachers and 1 respondent who

41
was 10% was educational officer that the solution on the effect of failure of English speaking

policy to students in schools is to provide motivation to the students who keep on speaking well

grammatical English language confidently. The motivation can be gift or rewards such as

exercise books, literary books or tour in front of the students. Therefore due to the motivation

provided to the students, others can be inspired to learn more and keep on practicing finally they

will be in a good position where they can speak English confidently.

4.6.5 Teachers should be the role Model of English Speakers

Teachers, students and educational officer used by a researcher as respondents in order to get

vivid information concerning the solutions on the failure of English speaking policy to the

students in Tanzania secondary schools which is the teachers to be the role model of English

speakers as explained in the table bellow;

Table 23: The Teachers should be the Role Model of English Speakers

Respondents Frequency Percentage

Students 12 48%

Teachers 12 48%

Educational officer 1 4%

Total 25 100%

Source: Field research 2016

According to the data collected in the field through questionnaire and interview show that 12

respondents who were 48% were students, 12 respondents who were 48% were teachers and 1

42
respondent who was 4% was regional educational officer stated that the solution on the effect of

failure in English speaking policy to students in schools is the teachers to be the role models of

English speakers. The teachers should use English in all school activities while they are at

school. This point gives students more courageous and inspiration in progressing or towards

learning English hence the problem cured

43
CHAPTER FIVE

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Introduction

This chapter consists of the conclusion of the research findings, summary of the study and

recommendations for further studies.

5.2 Summary of the Study

The research was conducted in Mtwara Mikindani Municipality which involved four secondary

schools which were Rahaleo, Mtwara Sisters, Shangani and Umoja secondary schools as the case

study on the title “An assessment on the failure English speaking policy to students in Tanzania

secondary schools”. The main objective of this research was to assess on the failure of English

speaking policy to students in Tanzania secondary schools especially Mtwara Mikindani

Municipality. Data collection was done through questionnaire and interview while tabling and

explanation in percentages were used to reflect the real numbers of participants from the

findings.

The research findings show that the main causes of failure of English speaking policy to students

and secondary schools are poor foundation of English speaking from primary level, low

motivation to English teachers, poor implementation of English speaking policy, incompetence

of English teachers, lack of teaching and learning aids and poor cooperation among the staff

members.

44
Also the findings discovered the effects of failure of English speaking policy to students such as

miscommunication between teachers and students, the medium of instruction and

communication become English and Kiswahili finally poor academic performance.

Finally the findings end up with the solutions such as intensive training of English teachers,

provide motivation to English teachers and students and establish English speaking competition

programs

5.3 Conclusion of the Study

Therefore, research findings show that the main causes of failure of English speaking policy to

students in secondary schools are poor foundation of English speaking from primary level, low

motivation to students and English teachers, poor implementation of English speaking policy,

incompetence of some English teachers, lack of teaching and learning aids and poor cooperation

among the staff members.

Also the findings discovered the effects of failure of English speaking policy to students are such

as miscommunication between teachers and students, the medium of instruction and

communication become English and Kiswahili, failure to express individually, lack of English

vocabularies finally poor academic performance.

Finally the findings end up with the solutions such for the failure of English speaking policy to

students in Tanzania secondary schools as intensive training of English teachers, provide

motivation to English teachers and students and establish English speaking competition

programs

45
5.4 Recommendation for further studies

Recommendation is mainly based on the findings presented in chapter four. From these findings

recommendation is made as follows bellow.

The government should train English teachers from primary education levels who are competent

in order to produce students who have good foundation of English language in secondary school.

Also the government should ensure enough availability of learning and teaching materials such

as textbooks, short story books and other supplementary books that simplify the leaning and

studying situation being conducive to the students.

The findings show that the school staff members should cooperate to treat the problem of the

policy because this problem belongs to all Tanzanian secondary school. The teaching of English

subject is not dealing much in training students English speaking.

The school should introduce the English speaking competition programs such as debating clubs,

morning speech and speech presentation. Teachers should motivate and correct grammatical

errors then guide students how to speak the correct grammar confidently

Intensive training of English teachers, the data collected shows that the intensive training of

English teachers should be conducted in order to make competent teachers. It is true that if

teachers are competent is easy to determine and realize the clear method of teaching English

language as the second language learning. Generally the competent teachers produce competent

students in all aspects of academic including speaking competence as English language skills.

46
5.5 Suggestions for Further Studies

This research study dealt with an assessment on the failure of English speaking policy to students

in Tanzania secondary schools Mtwara Mikindani Municipality as the case study. Through this

finding, there are so many gapes or loopholes to be investigated despite the fact that in this study

I have dealt on the causes, effects and solutions for the failure on English speaking policy to

students in secondary schools. It is better for the coming researchers to investigate on the

importance of English speaking policy in secondary schools.

47
REFERENCES

Bandura, A. (1989). Self-regulations and Action through Internal Standards and Systems. In

. Hills dale, N J: Erlbaum

Bell, J. (1999). Doing Your Research Project (3rd ed) Buckingham: Open University Press.

Boesen, J, et al. (1986). Tanzania: Crisis and Struggle for Survival. Scandinavia, Institute of

African Studies, Uppsala

Crasswell. (2005). Qualitative Inquiry and Research design Choosing among Five Thousands,

Oaks, and CA: Sage Publication

Gottneid, A. J. (1976). Church and Education in Tanzania. Nairobi.

Mbise, A. and Msoud. (1999). Search for Quality primary Education in Tanzania: the Case of

Private Primary Schools and International academies. Research Report, University of

Dar es Salaam

Mlama, P and Materu,M. (1978). Haja ya kutumia Kiswahili kufundishia katika elimu ya juu.

. BAKITA, Dar es Salaam

Mvungi, M. (1974). Language Policy Tanzanian Primary Schools with emphasis on

Implementation, M.A. Dissertation, University of Dar es Salaam

Nyere, J. K. (1967). Education for Self Reliance: Dar es Salaam government Printer. Tanzania

Swilla, I. N. (1992). The Relation of Local and Foreign Language to National Needs in Africa.

48
Journal Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 13(6): 505-551

The United Republic of Tanzania. (1995, 2007). Ministry of Education and Culture: Language

Policy, Dar es Salaam Tanzania

Whitley. (1969), Mazrui. (1995). The World Bank, the Language Questions and the Future of

African Education: Race and class

49
APPENDICES

APPENDIX 1: Research Time Schedule.

YEAR 2015 2016

Activities APRIL- JUNE- AUG- NOV- JAN- APRIL-

MAY JULY SEP DEC MARCH MAY


Submission
of the
Title.

Submission
of
Research
Proposal.
Data
Collection

Data
Analysis

Report
Writing

Report
Submission

50
APPENDIX II: Research Budget Schedule.

S/NO ITEMS DESCRIPTION QUANTITY PRICE TOTAL


EACH
1 Stationary -Bundle of 1 8000/=
ream paper.

-File 1 2000/=

-Typing and
Printing 40 800/=
Services

-Pens, ruler and 5000/=


note book

SUB-TOTAL 47000/=
2 Transport Motorcycle 6 5000/= 30000/=
Routes
SUB-TOTAL 77000/=
3 Food -Food 10 3000/= 30000/=
allowances such
as Breakfast,
lunch and supper
SUB-TOTAL 107000/=
4 Finishing and -Type 40 200/= 8000/=
Organization.
-Setting, binding
and duplications
copies 40 50/= 2000/=
SUB-TOTAL 117,000/=

GRANDTOTAL 117000/=

51
APPENDEX 3

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR STUDENTS

Part A: Introduction

The intent of this questionnaire is to get the information on the failure of English speaking policy

to student in Tanzania in secondary schools in Mtwara Mikindani Municipality. Therefore in

order to accomplish well this research, I request you to fill these questionnaires. The information

will be treated confidentially in order to observe research ethics.

Part B: Background Information of Respondents

Put a tick ( √ ) in the brackets provided

Class/Form: 1 ( ) 2. ( ) 3 ( ) 4 ( )

Sex: Male ( ) Female ( )

Part C: Content Questions

1 Is there any English speaking policy which states that “No English no service or Speak
English” at your school?

(a) Yes [ ] (b) No [ ]

2 What is your language of communication at your school?

_______________________________________________

3 Mention the causes of failure of English speaking policy at your school

_______________________________________________

_______________________________________________

4 Mention the effects of failure of English speaking policy at your school

_______________________________________________

_______________________________________________

5 Mention the possible solutions of failure of English speaking policy at your school

52
_______________________________________________

APPENDEX 4

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR TEACHERS

Part A: Introduction

The intent of this questionnaire is to get the information on the Failure of English speaking

policy to students in Tanzania in secondary schools in Mtwara Mikindani Municipality.

Therefore in order to accomplish well this research, I request you to fill these questionnaires. The

information will be treated confidentially in order to observe research ethics.

Part B: Content Questions

1 For how long have you been teaching at this school?

_____________________________________________

2 Which subjects do you teach at this school?

_____________________________________________

3 Do you face any language difficulties when you are teaching?

(a) Yes [ ] (b) No [ ]

4 What is English language speaking policy?

_____________________________________________

5 Mention the causes of failure of English speaking policy to students at your school

_____________________________________________

_____________________________________________

6 List the effects of failure of English speaking policy to students at your school

_____________________________________________

_____________________________________________

53
7 What are the possible solutions on failure of English speaking policy to students in Tanzania
secondary schools?

APPENDEX 5

INTERVIEW FOR EDUCATION OFFICER

GUIDE QUESTIONS FOR EDUCATION OFFICER

1 How long have you been working in this institution?

2 How do you understand on the term language policy?

3 What are challenges facing language policy in Tanzania education?

4 What do you understand on the term English speaking policy in Tanzania secondary schools?

5 What are the causes of failure of English speaking policy to students in Tanzania secondary

schools?

6 What are the effects of failure of English speaking policy to students in Tanzania secondary

schools?

7 What are the possible measures to be taken to overcome the failure of English speaking policy

in Tanzania secondary schools?

54

You might also like