Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Comparison of The Efficiency of Sensory Systems Involved in Postural Control of The Congenitally Deaf and Blind
Comparison of The Efficiency of Sensory Systems Involved in Postural Control of The Congenitally Deaf and Blind
ﭼﻜﻴﺪﻩ
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻳﻲ، ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ:ﻫﺪﻑ
the efficiency of sensory systems involved in ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺴﻲ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﺎﻥ
postural control of the congenitally deaf and blind.
، ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻘﻄﻌﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ: ﺭﻭﺵ.ﻣﺎﺩﺭﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ
Method: The statistical population of the present
cross-sectional study included all the congenitally ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻱ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻠﻴﻪ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻗﺰﻭﻳﻦ
deaf and blind people in Qazvin, Iran, from among ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻡ
whom, 21 congenital deaf students (11 boys and 10 ﭘﺴﺮ ﻭ11) ﺩﺍﻧﺶﺁﻣﻮﺯ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻱ ﻣﺎﺩﺭﺯﺍﺩﻱ21 ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ،ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ
girls) and 19 congenitally blind students (10 boys
and 9 girls) were selected through purposive ( ﺩﺧﺘﺮ9 ﭘﺴﺮ ﻭ10) ﻧﻔﺮ ﺩﺍﻧﺶﺁﻣﻮﺯ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎﻱ ﻣﺎﺩﺭﺯﺍﺩﻱ19 ﺩﺧﺘﺮ( ﻭ10
sampling according to the inclusion criteria. ﺍﺯ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ.ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ
Nashner’s postural control test was used to measure ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻳﻲ ﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ
the performance of each sensory system involved in
ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ.ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺴﻲ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ
postural control. Data were analyzed by an
independent t-test using SPSS (pã 0.05). Results: In ﺗﺠﺰﻳﻪﻭﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺷﺪSPSS ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺗﻲ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺮﻡﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ
the situation without sensory interference (p=0.003) ﺩﺭ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ، ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺑﻪﺩﺳﺖﺁﻣﺪﻩ: ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﻫﺎ.(Pã 0/05)
and in the predominance of the visual system ( ﻭ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲp=0/003) ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺗﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﺣﺴﻲ
(p=0.004), the deaf group had a better balance
function. However, in the predominance of the ( ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝp=0/004)
somatosensory system (p=0.001) and the vestibular ( ﻭp=0/001) ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺣﺲ ﭘﻴﻜﺮﻱ،ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
system (p=0.001), the blind showed better ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻱ،(p=0/001) ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ
performance. Conclusion: It seems that, in the
absence of the visual system, blind people have the ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ: ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﮔﻴﺮﻱ.ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ
most dependence on the somatosensory system, and ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺣﺲ
deaf people rely on the data from visual ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲﻛﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ،ﭘﻴﻜﺮﻱ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ
information to maintain greater balance, with the
ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺘﻜﻲ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ
somatosensory system playing a secondary role in
these individuals. .ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺣﺲ ﭘﻴﻜﺮﻱ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
40
ﺟﻮﺍﺩ ﺷﻮﻳﻜﻠﻮ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ :ﻣﻘﺎﻳ ﺴﺔ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻳﻲ ﺳﻴ ﺴﺘﻢ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺣ ﺴﻲ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ...
_________________________________________________________________________________
ﺍﺯﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﻴﻨﻲ ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺖ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﺻﺎﻑ )ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ( ﺍﺯ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺼﺒﻲ ،ﺣﺴﻲ ﻭ ﻋﻀﻼﻧﻲ
ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺁﻭﺭﺍﻥ 6ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ – ﺍﺳﻜﻠﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻛﻠﻲ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ
ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ ،ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ ﻭ ﺣﺲ ﭘﻴﻜﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻣﺤﻘﻘﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﻫﻢﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﮕﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻭ ﻫﺪﻑ
ﭘﺎﺳﺦﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺤﻲ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻧﻘﺺ ﺩﺭ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺟﻬﺖﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ )ﺷﺎﻡ ﻭﻱ-
ﻳﻚ ﺣﺲ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻً ﺑﻪﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪﻱ ﺩﻭ ﺣﺲ ﺑﺎﻗﻴﻤﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻮﻙ ،ﻭﻟﻜﺎﺕ 2007ﻭ .(1990ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺆﻟﻔﻪ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻏﻠﻂ ﻳﺎ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺛﻘﻞ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺍﺗﻜﺎ
ﻛﻪ ﺣﺲﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﻗﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ )ﺷﺎﻡ ﻭﻱ -ﻛﻮﻙ ﻭ ﻭﻟﻜﺎﺕ .(2007 ،ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ
ﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﺎﻗﺾ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺆﻟﻔﻪ ﺟﻬﺖﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﺣﺲ ﭘﻴﻜﺮﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ )ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻳﺎ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻗﺴﻤﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻭ
ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺍﺗﻜﺎ( ،ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺑﺎ ﭼﺸﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ
ﺑﺎ ﭼﺸﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ )ﺷﺎﻡ ﻭﻱ -ﻛﻮﻙ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﺗﻜﺎﻟﻴﻒ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﻱ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﻭ ﻭﻟﻜﺎﺕ .(2007 ،ﻋﻠﻲﺭﻏﻢ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻋﻤﻮﺩﻱ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺷﻮﺩ؛ ﻟﺬﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻲ ،ﺭﻭﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﻳﺞ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺣﺴﻲ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻱﻛﻪ
ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺟﻨﺒﻪ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻔﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺟﺎﺫﺑﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺍﺟﺰﺍء ﻭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺍﺗﻜﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺣﺴﻲ ﻋﻤﻘﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻣﺆﺛﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻳﻨﺪ ) ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻤﻲ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ
ﺗﻜﺎﻣﺠﺎﻧﻲ ،ﻧﻮﺭﺑﺨﺶ ،ﻭ ﺑﺼﻴﺮﻱ.(2000 ، ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ )ﺷﺎﻡ ﻭﻱ-
ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺧﻴﺮﺍً ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﺤﻘﻘﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻮﻙ ﻭ ﻭﻟﻜﺎﺕ(2007 ،
ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﻭﺍﻗﻊﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ »ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻱ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺕ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ
ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎ « ﺍﺳﺖ ﻃﺒﻖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻭ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻭ ﮔﺎﻩ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻗﺾ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻛﻮﺩﻛﺎﻥ
ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎ ،ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺗﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﻧﻘﺺ ﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺩﺍﺭ ﻭ ﻣﺸﺨﺼﻲ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ
ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻋﻀﻼﻧﻲ، ﺿﻌﻴﻒﺗﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻟﻲ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺭﺷﺪ
ﺍﺳﻜﻠﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻋﺼﺒﻲ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻫﺮ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻮﺩﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺳﺎﺯﮔﺎﺭ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﺗﺎ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻣﺤﻴﻄﻲ، ﻫﻔﺖﺳﺎﻟﮕﻲ ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﺳﭙﺲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺑﻴﺸﻴﻨﻪﻱ
ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ) ﺷﺎﻡ ﻭﻱ -ﻛﻮﻙ ﻭ ﻭﻟﻜﺎﺕ .(2007 ،ﺷﺎﻡ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﻭ ﻳﻜﻨﻮﺍﺧﺖ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﺭﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ،
ﻭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻴﻪﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻱ ،ﺭﻭﺷﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺑﺪﺍﻉ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺕ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩﻱ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮﺍﻝ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ
ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺴﻲ، ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻝ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ
ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺷﺎﺧﺼﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺴﻲ ﭘﻴﻜﺮﻱ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺗﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻋﺼﺒﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺣﺴﻲ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﺩﻥ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ
ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ) ﺷﺎﻡ ﻭﻱ -ﻛﻮﻙ ﻭ ﻭﻟﻜﺎﺕ.(2007، ﻗﺎﻣﺖ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ،ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺭﻭﻱ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺣﺴﻲ ﭘﻴﻜﺮﻱ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ، ﻧﮕﻬﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ) ﭘﺮﻭﻳﻦ،
ﻟﺬﺍ ﺍﺯﺁﻧﺠﺎﻛﻪ ﺳﻪ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ ،ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ ﻭ ﺣﺲ ﻫﺎﻭچ ﻭ ﻛﺮﻳﺴﺘﻨﺴﻦ.(2011 ،
41
ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻛﻮﺩﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﻳ ﻲ ،ﺳﺎﻝ ﻧﻮﺯﺩﻫﻢ ،ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻩ 48 -39 ،1398 ،1
__________________________________________________________________________________________
ﺑﺪﻧﻲ ﻣﻨﻈﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ ) ﮔﺎﻭﻟﻴﻚ ﻭ ﺯﻳﺮﻭﺳﺘﻮﺳﻜﺎ.2006 ، ﭘﻴﻜﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﺪﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺤﺮﻙ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ،
ﻭﻳﺮﺯﺑﻴﺴﻜﺎ ،ﺳﺎﻣﻮﻟﻴﻚ ﻭ ﺟﺘﻮﻥ ،ﻣﻮﺭﻭﺍﺳﻜﺎ.(2005 ، ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺳﻬﻢ ﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ
ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ.
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻛﻢﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﻭ ﻛﻢﺷﻨﻮﺍ ،ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﭼﻨﺪﮔﺎﻧﻪ، ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺕ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ،ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻣﻔﺼﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺗﻮﭘﺪﻳﻜﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﺭﺩ ﮔﺮﺩﻥ، ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﻭ ﻣﺎﺩﺭﺯﺍﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻧﻘﺺ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﻤﺮﺩﺭﺩ ،ﺭﻣﺎﺗﻴﺴﻢ ﻣﻔﺼﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻧﻘﺺ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﻧﺪﺍﻡﻫﺎ )ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻱ (1390 ،ﻭ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ. ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﺿﻌﻴﻒﺗﺮﻱ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺳﺎﻟﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺩﺍﻭﻃﻠﺐ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺍﺟﻤﺎﻟﻲ ،ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﻓﺮﻡ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺕ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ
ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖﺑﺪﻧﻲ ﻣﺪﺭﺳﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﻟﻢ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲﻛﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎ
ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻗﺰﻭﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ. ﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻧﻘﺺ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ
ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ
ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﺮ ،ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1976ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻥ ﺳﻬﻢ ﻫﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ،
ﻟﻮﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﻴﺸﻞ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﺮ 7ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﺠﻮﻳﺰ ﺗﻤﺮﻳﻨﺎﺕ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ
ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﺍﺑﺪﺍﻉ ﮔﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1986 ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻟﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؛
ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺷﺎﻡ ﻭﻱ -ﻛﻮﻙ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ،ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﺎﻫﺪﻑ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻳﻲ
ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺴﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺴﻲ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺿﺮﻳﺐ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ 0/82ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﺩﺭﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ.
ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻨﻲ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ) ﺭﻭﺵ
ﺷﺎﻡ ﻭﻱ -ﻛﻮﻙ ﻭ ﻭﻟﻜﺎﺕ .(2007،ﺩﺭ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ، ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻘﻄﻌﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩﮔﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺁﻧﺘﺮﻭﭘﻮﻣﺘﺮﻳﻚ ﻭ ﺛﺒﺖ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻻﺕ
ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻧﻴﺎﺯ ،ﺑﻪﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺣﺴﻲ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻗﺰﻭﻳﻦ ،ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻳﻲ ﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺴﻲ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ،ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ 37ﺩﺍﻧﺶﺁﻣﻮﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻝ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ،
ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ،ﺍﺯ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ 19ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ) 10ﭘﺴﺮ ﻭ 9ﺩﺧﺘﺮ( ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ 43
ﺷﺪ ) .ﺷﺎﻡ ﻭﻱ -ﻛﻮﻙ ﻭ ﻭﻟﻜﺎﺕ .2007ﻃﺎﻫﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺶﺁﻣﻮﺯ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍ 21 ،ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻱ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﻣﺎﺩﺭﺯﺍﺩﻱ )11
ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ .1396 ،ﺳﻴﺪﻱ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ .(2015ﺍﺯ ﭘﺴﺮ ﻭ 10ﺩﺧﺘﺮ( ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﭘﺰﺷﻜﻲ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﻫﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺣﺴﻲ ﻣﺪﺭﺳﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺍﻥ ،ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺪﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﺪ
ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﺭﺳﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺶ ﻣﺎﻩ ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﮔﺮﺩﻳﺪ .ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺣﺴﻲ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺪﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﺪ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ :1ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻳﻚﭘﺎ ﻭ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ 65ﺩﺳﻲﺑﻞ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ،
ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﭼﺸﻢﺑﺎﺯ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺘﻮﻥ ﻓﻘﺮﺍﺕ )ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ
ﺣﺴﻲ؛ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ :2ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻳﻚﭘﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺍﺳﻜﻮﻟﻴﻮﺯ ،ﻛﺎﻳﻔﻮﺯﻳﺲ( ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺤﺘﺎﻧﻲ )ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻒ
ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻪﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﻓﻮﻡ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻫﺎﻳﭙﺮ ﭘﺎﻱ ﺻﺎﻑ ،ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻫﻲ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻫﺎ( ،ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ
ﺍﻛﺴﺘﻨﺸﻦ ﺳﺮ؛ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ :3ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻳﻚﭘﺎ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﻳﺎ ﺗﺸﻨﺞ ﻭ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﻭﺭﺯﺷﻲ ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ
42
ﺟﻮﺍﺩ ﺷﻮﻳﻜﻠﻮ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ :ﻣﻘﺎﻳ ﺴﺔ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻳﻲ ﺳﻴ ﺴﺘﻢ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺣ ﺴﻲ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ...
_________________________________________________________________________________
30ﺩﺭﺟﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻟﮕﻦ )ﺭﺍﻥ(؛ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ 5ﺛﺎﻧﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﭼﺸﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻫﺎﻳﭙﺮ ﺍﻛﺴﺘﻨﺸﻦ
ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ .ﺷﺎﻳﺎﻥﺫﻛﺮ ﺳﺮ؛ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ :4ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻳﻚﭘﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﺮ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ،ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﺕ 5 ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻪﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﻓﻮﻡ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﭼﺸﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ؛
ﺩﻗﻴﻘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻧﺸﺴﺘﻪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺻﻨﺪﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺩﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻛﻤﺮ
ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻫﻦ ﻭ ﺷﻮﺭﺕ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﻫﺮ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﺕ 20
ﻭﺭﺯﺷﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻦ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺮﻫﻨﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻛﻞ ﺧﻄﺎﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺗﻜﺐ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﺮﺓ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ ﺷﺪ.
ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﭘﺎﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻣﺖ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﺤﻘﻖ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﻫﺮ ﺧﻄﺎﻫﺎ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ :ﺩﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻤﺮ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ؛
ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺳﻪ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﺔ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻫﺮ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ ﭘﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﺩﻥ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻳﻚﭘﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ 10ﺛﺎﻧﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ )ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻱ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺑﻠﻨﺪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ،ﻟﻲﻟﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎ
.2008ﻃﺎﻫﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ .1396ﺳﻴﺪﻱ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﭘﺎ؛ ﺑﻠﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﭘﻨﺠﻪ ﻳﺎ ﭘﺎﺷﻨﻪ ﭘﺎ؛
.(2015ﺷﻜﻞ ):(1 ﻓﻠﻜﺸﻦ )ﺧﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ( ﻳﺎ ﺍﺑﺪﺍﻛﺸﻦ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﺷﻜﻞ .1ﺣﺎﻟﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺴﻲ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ :ﺍﻟﻒ( ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ) 1ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﺣﺴﻲ(؛ ﺏ( ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ) 2ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ
ﺑﺎ ﺗﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ ﻭ ﺣﺲ ﻋﻤﻘﻲ(؛ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ) 3ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ(؛ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ) 4ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺣﺲ
ﻋﻤﻘﻲ(
ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺣﺴﻲ ـﭘﻴﻜﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺨﺘﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺎﻥﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺣﺴﻲ –
ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ )ﭘﺎﻧﺪﻳﻦ، ﭘﻴﻜﺮﻱ ﺑﻪﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻓﻮﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﻛﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺟﺘﻠﻲ .2001 ،ﺳﺎﻻﺭﻱ ،ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﺑﻲﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻣﺨﺘﻞ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﻤﻨﺪﻱ .2013ﺷﺎﻡ ﻭﻱ -ﻛﻮﻙ ﻭ ﻭﻟﻜﺎﺕ .2007 ﺩﻗﻴﻘﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻋﺼﺒﻲ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ
ﻃﺎﻫﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ .1396ﺳﻴﺪﻱ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ .(2015 ﻣﺨﺎﺑﺮﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺧﺎﻡ ﺑﻪﺩﺳﺖﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻫﺎﻳﭙﺮﺍﻛﺴﺘﻨﺸﻦ ﺳﺮ ﻣﺨﺘﻞ ﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ
ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻔﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ،1ﻫﺮ ﺳﻪ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺣﺴﻲ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ
ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺗﺠﺰﻳﻪﻭﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺷﺪ .ﺟﻬﺖ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻧﺮﻣﺎﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﺑﺎﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ،2ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ
ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻠﻤﻮﮔﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﺳﻤﻴﺮﻧﻮﻑ ﺣﺴﻲ ـ ﭘﻴﻜﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻓﻘﻂ
ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﮔﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺮﻣﺎﻝ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻝ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺯ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻱ ﺗﻲ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻣﻌﻨﻲﺩﺍﺭﻱ 0/05 ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ،3ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﻪﺩﺳﺖﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺩﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺣﺴﻲ ـﭘﻴﻜﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ
ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺮﻡﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ SPSSﻧﺴﺨﻪ 23ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ. ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ،4ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ
43
ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻛﻮﺩﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﻳ ﻲ ،ﺳﺎﻝ ﻧﻮﺯﺩﻫﻢ ،ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻩ 48 -39 ،1398 ،1
__________________________________________________________________________________________
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻳﻲ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺴﻲ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺑﻪﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻳﻲ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺴﻲ
ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺩﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﻭ
ﻣﻌﻨﻲﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ).(P ã 0/05 ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺗﻲ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﺪﻭﻝ 3ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﻦ
ﺟﺪﻭﻝ .4ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺗﻲ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪﻱ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺴﻲ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎ
*
P t ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍ ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮ
ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭ ±ﻣﻴﺎﻧﮕﻴﻦ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭ ±ﻣﻴﺎﻧﮕﻴﻦ
*
0/003 3/20 4/47±2/14 2/57±1/59 ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺧﻄﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻭﻝ
*
0/004 3/02 7/05±1/50 5/80±1/07 ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺧﻄﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺩﻭﻡ
*
0/001 4/00 5/84±1/50 7/71±1/45 ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺧﻄﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺳﻮﻡ
*
0/001 4/56 6/26±1/28 8/14±1/31 ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺧﻄﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ
*ﺳﻄﺢ ﻣﻌﻨﻲﺩﺍﺭﻱ P ã 0/05
44
ﺟﻮﺍﺩ ﺷﻮﻳﻜﻠﻮ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ :ﻣﻘﺎﻳ ﺴﺔ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻳﻲ ﺳﻴ ﺴﺘﻢ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺣ ﺴﻲ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ...
_________________________________________________________________________________
ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻛﻠﻲ ﺣﺬﻑ ﮔﺮﺩﻳﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻫﻤﺎﻥﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺲ ﭘﻴﻜﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺳﻨﺠﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﺣﺴﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﻴﺎﻧﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻘﺺ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ
ﻭ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ،ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻣﻌﻨﻲﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺩﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ
ﺣﺲ ﭘﻴﻜﺮﻱ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ) .(p=0/003ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺨﺘﻞ
ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻔﺎ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻥ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ ﻭ ﺣﺴﻲ ﻋﻤﻘﻲ ،ﮔﺮﻭﻩ
ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺨﺘﻞ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻥ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺣﺲ ﭘﻴﻜﺮﻱ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻱ ﻛﺴﺐ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ
ﻭ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ ،ﻧﻘﺶ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﻣﻌﻨﻲﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺩﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ) .(p=0/004ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻨﺠﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺳﻮﻡ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺨﺘﻞ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻥ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ ﻭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ. ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ ،ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺛﺒﺖ
ﻓﺮﺩ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻭ ﭘﺮﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺣﺲ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻣﻌﻨﻲﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺩﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ
ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺣﺲﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﺍﺭﺯﺷﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ) .(p=0/001ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺨﺘﻞ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻥ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ؛ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺲ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ ،ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﻗﺎﺑﻞﺍﻃﻤﻴﻨﺎﻥﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺟﺰﺋﻲﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺛﺒﺖ ﺑﺮﺳﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﺍﻃﺮﺍﻑ ،ﺑﻪﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻣﻌﻨﻲﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺩﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ
ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚﺳﻮﻡ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻐﺰ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ).(p=0/002
ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ. ﺑﺤﺚ ﻭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﮔﻴﺮﻱ
ﺑﺎ ﭼﺸﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﻧﻮﺳﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺳﺎﻟﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺑﻪﺩﺳﺖﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺩﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ
ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﺩﻩ 20ﺗﺎ 70ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺣﺴﻲ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻣﻌﻨﻲﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﭼﺸﻢﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ )ﺳﺎﻻﻣﻮ ،ﻣﻴﺘﺴﻮﺣﻴﺮﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﺎﻥ
ﻭ ﺑﻠﻮﺭﻑ .( 2009 ،ﺣﻔﻆ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﻣﺴﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻮﻡ ﻭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺣﺴﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺣﺴﻲ ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ ،ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺣﺲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﻮﻧﻪ
ﭘﻴﻜﺮﻱ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺭﺍﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺼﺒﻲ ﺗﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﺣﺴﻲ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺖ ،ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺎﺩﺭﺯﺍﺩ
ﺳﻄﻮﺡ ﻧﺨﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻧﺨﺎﻋﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻋﺼﺒﻲ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻧﻘﺺ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻳﻚ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ،
ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻘﺶ
ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﻟﻲ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻱ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ
ﺳﻨﺠﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺷﻤﺎﻱ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻱ
ﻭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻋﺼﺒﻲ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺣﺲ ﭘﻴﻜﺮﻱ ﻭ
ﻫﺮﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻝ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ
ﺳﮕﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ )ﻛﺎﻣﺒﺮﻭﻭﺭﺙ، ﺩﻗﻴﻖﺗﺮ ﺳﻨﺠﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﭘﺎﺗﻞ ،ﺭﺍﺟﺮﺯ ﻭ ﻛﻨﻴﻮﻥ .(2007 ،ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺛﺒﺖ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﺩﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻗﺎﺋﻢ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻝ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺴﺘﻦ
ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﭼﺸﻢ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ
45
ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻛﻮﺩﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﻳ ﻲ ،ﺳﺎﻝ ﻧﻮﺯﺩﻫﻢ ،ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻩ 48 -39 ،1398 ،1
__________________________________________________________________________________________
ﻣﺜﺒﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﺳﺎﺯﮔﺎﺭﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺫﺍﺗﻲ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻮﺳﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ،
ﺑﺎ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻭ ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻔﻆ
ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻧﻘﺺ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ، ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ) ﺩﻟﻴﺎﮔﻴﻨﺎ ،ﺯﻟﻨﻴﻦ ،ﺑﻠﻮﺻﺮﻭﻭﺍ ،ﻭ
ﺳﻌﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺣﻮﺍﺱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻭﺭﻟﻮﺳﻜﻲ .2007 ،ﮔﺎﺭﺳﻴﺎ ،ﺑﺎﺭﻻ ،ﻭﻳﺎﺍﻧﺎ ،ﻭ ﺑﺎﺭﻻ،
ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﺺ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪﻣﺮﻭﺭﺯﻣﺎﻥ .(2011ﻟﺬﺍ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺴﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻗﻪ ﻣﻐﺰ
ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻭ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺨﭽﻪ ﻭ ﺳﭙﺲ ﻛﺮﺗﻜﺲ ﻣﻐﺰ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﻭ ﺣﻔﻆ
ﺁﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ) ﻫﻮﻣﻔﺮﻳﺰ .2011 ،ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻱ.(1390 ، ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ،ﺟﻤﻊﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺵ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ )ﺩﻟﻴﺎﮔﻴﻨﺎ،
ﻃﺎﻫﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻠﻮﺻﺮﻭﻭﺍ ،ﺯﻟﻨﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺍﺭﻭﻟﻮﺳﻜﻲ .2008 ،ﺩﻟﻴﺎﮔﻴﻨﺎ،
ﻣﺎﺩﺭﺯﺍﺩ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ،(2007ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻱﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺶ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ )ﺭﻳﻨﺎﻟﺪ ،ﭘﻼﺳﺘﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺭﻻ.(2009 ،
ﺗﻤﺮﻳﻨﻲ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﻲ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺗﻤﺮﻳﻨﺎﺕ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﻭ ﻋﺼﺒﻲ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺣﺴﻲ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﺗﺎﺳﺮ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻋﻀﻼﻧﻲ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻋﺼﺒﻲ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﻣﺨﺎﺑﺮﻩ
ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ ،ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ ﻭ
ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺗﻤﺮﻳﻨﻲ ،ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺣﺲ ﭘﻴﻜﺮﻱ ﺣﺲ ﭘﻴﻜﺮﻱ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﻭ ﻋﻀﻼﺕ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﻪ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﻫﺮ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺧﺎﺹ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻭ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻫﺮﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺟﺴﺘﻪﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﻜﻲ ﻧﻘﺶ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ)ﻃﺎﻫﺮﻱ ,ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﺪﻭﺳﺖ ,ﻧﻮﺭﺳﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺷﻮﻳﻜﻠﻮ، ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺟﺴﺘﻪﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ
.(1396ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻝ ﺩﺭﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺗﻤﺮﻳﻨﺎﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻫﻢﭘﻮﺷﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻫﺮﮔﺎﻩ
ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎ ﻧﺎﻗﺺ ﻳﺎ ﻧﺎﺭﺳﺎ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ،
ﺑﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻋﺎﺩﻱ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚﺗﺮ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ. ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻋﺼﺒﻲ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﺩﺭﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻫﻲ
ﻭ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻧﻘﺺ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ،
ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺮ ﻛﺴﻲ ﭘﻮﺷﻴﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻣﻌﻤﻮﻝ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻪ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺕ ﺩﺭﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻱ ﺿﻌﻒ ﻣﺨﺘﻞ ،ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺬﻑ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻋﺼﺒﻲ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ
ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻟﻲ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺤﻘﻘﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻴﻪﺑﺮ ﻳﻚ ﻳﺎ ﺩﻭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ.
ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﻘﺺ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺭ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻳﻲ ﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ
ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺴﻲ – ﭘﻴﻜﺮﻱ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻟﻲ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ،ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺨﺘﻞ
ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻟﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﮔﺮﺩﻳﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺴﺘﻦ ﭼﺸﻢﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻫﺎﻳﭙﺮﺍﻛﺴﺘﻨﺸﻦ
ﻋﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ) ﺩﻟﻴﺎﮔﻴﻨﺎ ،ﺯﻟﻨﻴﻦ ،ﺑﻠﻮﺻﺮﻭﻭﺍ ،ﻭ ﺳﺮ ،ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻋﺼﺒﻲ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﻭﺭﻟﻮﺳﻜﻲ .(2007 ،ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺣﺎﻟﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺪﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ، ﺣﺲ ﭘﻴﻜﺮﻱ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺑﺎﺍﻳﻦﺣﺎﻝ ،ﺍﺯ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ
46
ﺟﻮﺍﺩ ﺷﻮﻳﻜﻠﻮ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ :ﻣﻘﺎﻳ ﺴﺔ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻳﻲ ﺳﻴ ﺴﺘﻢ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺣ ﺴﻲ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ...
_________________________________________________________________________________
ﺑﺎ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺣﺴﻲ ﭘﻴﻜﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ
ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻝ ﺣﺴﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﺑﺨﺸﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯﺁﻧﺠﺎﻛﻪ
ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎ ﺑﺨﺸﻴﺪ. ﺁﺳﻴﺐ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ ﻋﻠﺖ ﻧﻘﺺ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻟﻲ
ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺑﻪﺩﺳﺖﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ،ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻲ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻝ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻱ ﻣﺎﺩﺭﺯﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﻧﻘﺺ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ؛ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺳﻴﺐ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﻧﻘﺺ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻲ
ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﺑﻪﻣﺮﻭﺭﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ )ﺭﻱ ،ﻫﻮﻭﺍﺭﺕ ،ﻛﺮﻭﭼﻲ ،ﻣﺎﺳﻮﻥ
ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻭ ﻭ ﻭﻟﻒ .(2008 ،ﺍﺯﺍﻳﻦﺭﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻳﻲ ﻧﺎﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ
ﺳﭙﺲ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺣﺲ ﭘﻴﻜﺮﻱ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﺗﺄﺧﻴﺮ ﺭﺷﺪ
ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻳﻔﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ؛ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﺩﺭﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ
ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ، ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻳﻲ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺴﻲ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ
ﺑﻪﻣﺮﻭﺭﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺣﺲ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ ،ﺑﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪﻱ ﻫﺮ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ،ﻧﻘﺶ
ﭘﻴﻜﺮﻱ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻪﻛﺎﺭﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺴﻲ ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚﺷﺪﻩﺗﺮ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻗﺎﻃﻌﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺳﻌﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺧﻮﺩﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ؛ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﺯﺍﻳﻦﺭﻭ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺿﻌﻒ ﻳﺎ
ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻳﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻣﺆﺛﺮ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﻭ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺺ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺴﻲ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ ،ﺣﺴﻲ ﭘﻴﻜﺮﻱ ﻳﺎ
ﺿﻌﻒ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ،ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻠﻴﺰﻱ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺳﻄﻮﺡ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻤﺮﻳﻨﻲ ،ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻮﺩﻛﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﺩﻫﻲ ﻭ ﻳﻜﭙﺎﺭﭼﮕﻲ ﺣﺴﻲ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ
ﻛﻢﺗﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺟﺴﻤﻲ ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ، ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺺ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺴﻢ
ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﺨﺼﺺ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺑﺪﻧﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻮﺩﻛﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺑﺎﺍﻳﻦﺣﺎﻝ ،ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻝ ﺣﺴﻲ ﻭ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ. ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺭﺯﺷﻲ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺗﺸﻜﺮ ﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺩﺍﻧﻲ ﺗﻤﺮﻳﻨﻲ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ،ﺗﻤﺮﻳﻨﺎﺕ
ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻲ )ﺭﻩ( ﻭ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺣﺲ ﻋﻤﻘﻲ ﮔﻨﺠﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﮔﻴﻼﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵﻭﭘﺮﻭﺭﺵ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻗﺰﻭﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ،ﻧﻘﺺ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻡ ﻣﺪﺭﺳﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﺭﺱ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺴﻲ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻣﺪﺭﺳﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺎﺿﻴﺎﻥ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻗﺰﻭﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ،ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺭﺯﺷﻲ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻮﺍﻳﺪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻳﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺗﺸﻜﺮ ﺭﺍﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ. ﺗﻤﺮﻳﻨﺎﺕ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺣﺲ ﻋﻤﻘﻲ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﭘﻲﻧﻮﺷﺖﻫﺎ ﺗﻤﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺗﺨﺘﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ،ﺗﻮپﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻮﺋﻴﺲ ﺑﺎﻝ ،ﺗﻲ
1. Vestibular
2. Somatosensory ﺁﺭ ﺍﻳﻜﺲ ﻭ ...ﻛﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﻭﺳﺎﻳﻞ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ
3. General system theory ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻲ ﻗﺎﺑﻞﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ
4. Posture
5. Proprioception ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ،ﺍﻳﻦﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﻤﺮﻳﻨﺎﺕ ﻛﻪ
6. Afferent ﻣﺤﻴﻄﻲ ﺑﻲﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﺭﺯﺷﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ،
7. Lewis Michael Nashner
8. BMI ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺣﺲ ﻋﻤﻘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ
ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻟﺬﺍ
47
48 -39 ،1398 ،1 ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻩ، ﺳﺎﻝ ﻧﻮﺯﺩﻫﻢ،ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻛﻮﺩﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﻳ ﻲ
__________________________________________________________________________________________
validity study in healthy Indian children. ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ
Journal of Pediatric Neurology, 9(03), 311-318 .
Parving, A., Hauch, A., & Christensen, B. (2003). .(1390) . ﻑ, ﺣﺎﺟﻲ ﺣﻴﺪﺭﻱ,. ﻥ, ﺭﺿﺎﺯﺍﺩﻩ,. ﺯ, ﻣﻼﻳﺮﻱ,. ﺯ,ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻱ
Hearing loss in children--epidemiology, age at ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻟﻲ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎ ﻭ ﭘﻮﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻮﺩﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﻢﺷﻨﻮﺍﻱ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺗﺎ
identification and causes through 30 years. .102 ,(2) ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﻴﺴﺘﻢ, ﻣﺠﻠﻪ ﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ.ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﻣﺎﺩﺭﺯﺍﺩ
Ugeskrift for laeger, 165(6), 574-579 .
Ray, C. T., Horvat, M., Croce, R., Mason, R. C., & ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮ.(1396) ﺝ, ﻭ ﺷﻮﻳﻜﻠﻮ,. ﺍ. ﻉ, ﻧﻮﺭﺳﺘﻪ,. ﺍ. ﺥ, ﺩﻭﺳﺖ,. ﻡ,ﻃﺎﻫﺮﻱ
Wolf, S. L. (2008). The impact of vision loss on ﻋﻀﻼﻧﻲ ﺑﺮ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﭽﺮ-ﺗﻤﺮﻳﻨﺎﺕ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﻲ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﻭ ﻋﺼﺒﻲ
postural stability and balance strategies in ﻣﺠﻠﻪ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ.ﺩﺍﻧﺶﺁﻣﻮﺯﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻣﺎﺩﺭﺯﺍﺩﻱ
individuals with profound vision loss. Gait &
posture, 28(1), 58-61 . .86-80 ,(2)13 ,ﺗﻮﺍﻥﺑﺨﺸﻲ
Rinaldi, N. M., Polastri, P. F., & Barela, J. A. Cumberworth, V., Patel, N., Rogers, W., &
(2009). Age-related changes in postural control Kenyon, G. (2007). The maturation of balance
sensory reweighting. Neuroscience letters, in children. The Journal of Laryngology &
467(3), 225-229 . Otology, 121(5), 449-454 .
Salari, A., Sahebozamani, M., & Daneshmandi, H. Deliagina, T. G., Beloozerova, I., Zelenin, P., &
(2013). The effect of core stability training Orlovsky, G. (2008). Spinal and supraspinal
program on balance in blind female athletes. postural networks. Brain research reviews,
Journal of Health and Development, 20(6 .( 57(1), 212-221 .
Salomão, S. R., Mitsuhiro, M. R., & Belfort Jr, R. Deliagina, T. G., Zelenin, P. V., Beloozerova, I. N.,
(2009). Visual impairment and blindness: an & Orlovsky, G. N. (2007). Nervous
overview of prevalence and causes in Brazil. mechanisms controlling body posture.
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, Physiology & behavior, 92(1), 148-154 .
81(3 .��� -��� ,( Ebrahimi Takamjani, E., Noorbakhsh ,M., & Basiri,
Schmid, M., Nardone, A., De Nunzio, A. M., S. (2000). Assessing the influence of sensory
Schmid, M., & Schieppati, M. (2007). information on controling standing balance in
Equilibrium during static and dynamic tasks in different age groups. Razi Journal of Medical
blind subjects: no evidence of cross-modal Sciences, 7(21), 171-175 .
plasticity. Brain, 130(8), 2097-2107 . Garcia, C., Barela, J. A., Viana, A. R., & Barela, A.
Shumway-Cook, A., & Woollacott, M .H. (2007). M. F. (2011). Influence of gymnastics training
Motor control: translating research into clinical on the development of postural control.
practice: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Neuroscience letters, 492(1), 29-32 .
Wierzbicka-Damska, I., Samo� yk, A., Jethon, Z., Gawlik, K., & Zwierzchowska, A. (2006). A
Wierci�s ka, J., & Murawska-Cia�o wicz, E. Comparison of Chosen Strength Abilities in
(2005). Physical efficiency of 10-16-year-old Deaf and Blind Adolescents. Journal of human
boys with hearing impairment. Roczniki kinetics, 15, 97 .
Akademii Medycznej w Bialymstoku (1995), Humphriss, R., Hall, A., May, M., & Macleod, J.
50, 167-169 . (2011). Balance ability of 7 and 10 year old
Woollacott, M. H., & Shumway-Cook, A. (1990). children in the population: results from a large
Changes in posture control across the life UK birth cohort study. International journal of
span—a systems approach. Physical therapy, pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 75(1), 106-113 .
70(12), 799-807 . Mohammad reza S, Foad S, Abbas R, Homan
M.Evaluation of the effectiveness of sensory
systems involved in postural control of athlete
and non-athlete deaf. Sports Medicine. 2015;
7(3): 111-127.
Mohammadi F. Evaluation of CNS functions in
postural control during manipulation of atrial
and sensory systems in Golbalathletes and
comparison with non-athletics blind and
visually [MSc Thesis]. Tehran, Iran: University
of Tehran; 2008.p. 14-109.
Nakata, H., & Yabe ,K. (2001). Automatic postural
response systems in individuals with congenital
total blindness. Gait & posture, 14(1), 36-43 .
Pandian, T. J. S., Ukamath, S., Jetley, N., &
Prabhu, R. (2011). Clinical test of sensory
interaction in balance (CTSIB): Concurrent
48