Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Stipulation of Dismissal Under FED. R. CIV. P. 41 (A) (Ii)
Stipulation of Dismissal Under FED. R. CIV. P. 41 (A) (Ii)
11
RAMBUS INC., CASE NO.: C 05-00334 RMW
12
Plaintiff, STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL UNDER
13 FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(ii)
vs.
14 Hon. Ronald M. Whyte
HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17 STIPULATION
18 WHEREAS plaintiff Rambus Inc. filed a First Amended Complaint in this matter
19 on June 6, 2005;
20 WHEREAS Count IX of the First Amended Complaint asserts infringement of
21 U.S. Patent No. 6,493,789 (“the ‘789 patent”);
22 WHEREAS Count X of the First Amended Complaint asserts infringement of U.S.
23 Patent No. 6,496,897 (“the ‘897 patent”);
24 WHEREAS defendants Hynix Semiconductor, Inc., Hynix Semiconductor
25 America, Inc., and Hynix Semiconductor Manufacturing America, Inc., Hynix Semiconductor
26 UK Ltd., and Hynix Semiconductor Deutschland GmbH (“Hynix”) filed Counterclaims in this
27 matter on June 27, 2005 and July 30, 2007;
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
-1- CASE NO. C 05-334 RMW
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2212 Filed 09/16/2008 Page 2 of 8
2 First Amended Complaint and Counterclaims and its July 30, 2007 Hynix's Answer To Rambus's
3 Reply to Hynix's First Amended Answer and Counterclaims and Rambus's Counterclaims in
7 America, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor Inc., and Samsung Austin Semiconductor, L.P.
8 (“Samsung”) filed Counterclaims in this matter on January 31, 2007 and January 4, 2008;
9 WHEREAS Samsung’s Counts VIII, IX, and X of its January 31, 2007 and
13 July 9, 2007;
17 Corporation USA (“Nanya”) filed Counterclaims in this matter on July 9, 2007 and December 21,
18 2007.
20 Answer to First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement, Affirmative Defenses, and
21 Counterclaims and December 21, 2007 Reply to Rambus Inc.’s Counterclaims in Reply,
22 Affirmative Defenses thereto, and Counterclaims in Reply thereto seek, inter alia, declaratory
23 judgments of noninfringement, invalidity, and unenforceability of the ‘789 and ‘897 patents;
24 WHEREAS plaintiff Rambus filed Counterclaims against Nanya on July 24, 2007;
27 WHEREAS, defendant Rambus Inc. (“Rambus”) has filed with the Court and
28 provided to Samsung, Hynix, and Nanya a covenant not to sue with respect to the ‘789 Patent and
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
-2- CASE NO. C 05-334 RMW
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2212 Filed 09/16/2008 Page 3 of 8
1 the ‘897 Patents, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A (“the Covenant”);
2 WHEREAS the parties agree that the Covenant eliminates any need for declaratory
3 relief that Samsung, Nanya, and Hynix may have had with respect to the ‘789 Patent and the ‘897
4 Patent, and mutually wish to dismiss all claims and counterclaims relating to the ‘789 and ‘897
5 patents;
6 WHEREAS Hynix, Nanya, and Samsung each do not concede that the ‘789 Patent
7 and the ‘897 Patent are valid, enforceable, or infringed by Hynix, Nanya, or Samsung, but, to the
8 contrary, contend that those patents are invalid, unenforceable, and not infringed;
10 concedes the allegations of Samsung, Nanya, and Hynix that the ’789 patent and the ’897 patent
11 are invalid, unenforceable, and/or not infringed by the Manufacturers, but, to the contrary, denies
12 those allegations;
14 to the dismissal with prejudice of Rambus’s claims and counterclaims for infringement of the
15 ‘789 and ‘897 patents and Samsung’s, Nanya’s, and Hynix’s counterclaims for declarations that
16 the ‘789 Patent and the ‘897 Patent are invalid, unenforceable and/or not infringed.
18 //
19 //
20 //
21 //
22 //
23 //
24 //
25 //
26 //
27 //
28 //
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
-3- CASE NO. C 05-334 RMW
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2212 Filed 09/16/2008 Page 4 of 8
4
By: /s/ Jennifer L. Polse
5
JENNIFER L. POLSE
6
Attorneys for RAMBUS INC.
7
THEODORE BROWN III
DATED: September 16, 2008
8 TOWNSEND and TOWNSEND and CREW,
LLP
9
10
17 MATTHEW ANTONELLI
DATED: September 16, 2008 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
18
19
By: /s/ Matthew Antonelli
20 MATTHEW ANTONELLI
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
-4- CASE NO. C 05-334 RMW
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2212 Filed 09/16/2008 Page 5 of 8
THERESA NORTON
DATED: September 16, 2008
1 ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE
LLP
2
3
By: /s/ Theresa E. Norton
4 THERESA E. NORTON
5 Attorneys for NANYA TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION, NANYA TECHNOLOGY
6 CORPORATION U.S.A.
7
10 Filer's Attestation:
11 I, Jennifer L. Polse, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to
13 with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Theodore Brown, Matthew Antonelli and Theresa
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
-5- CASE NO. C 05-334 RMW
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2212 Filed 09/16/2008 Page 6 of 8
Exhibit A
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2212 Filed 09/16/2008 Page 7 of 8
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2212 Filed 09/16/2008 Page 8 of 8