Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hip Prosthesis
Hip Prosthesis
Hip Prosthesis
24 Hip Prosthesis
Stephen Eustace and Patricia Cunningham
CONTENTS 24.1
Introduction
24.1 Introduction 393
24.2 Anatomy and Definition of Terms 393
24.3 Conventional Imaging 394
Imaging of hip prostheses using conventional and
24.3.1 Cement Fixation 394 newer techniques will be reviewed in this chapter.
24.3.2 Radiographic Appearances of Cement Component Conventional modalities, radiographs, arthrograms
Loosening 394 and scintigraphy remain useful methods of evaluating
24.4 Arthrography in Cemented Component primary complications of hardware fixation (loosen-
Loosening 395
24.4.1 Technetium-99m Methylene Diphosphonate Bone
ing and infection), but developments in technology,
Scanning in the Detection of Cemented Component particularly techniques to reduce metal-induced arte-
Loosening 396 fact, allow detailed evaluation of adjacent soft tissues
24.5 Noncemented Techniques 396 with both CT scan and MR imaging.
24.5.1 Radiographic Evaluation of Loosening
in Noncemented Components 397
24.5.2 Technetium-99m MDP Scintigraphy in the
Evaluation of Noncemented Component
Loosening 397 24.2
24.5.3 Arthrography in the Evaluation of Noncemented Anatomy and Definition of Terms
Component Loosening 397
24.6 The Evaluation of Prosthesis Infection 397
24.6.1 Arthrographic Appearance and Aspiration
A total hip arthroplasty has both femoral and ace-
Arthrography 397 tabular components.
24.6.2 Scintigraphy 398 The acetabular component includes a fixation
24.7 Specific Complications of Joint Prostheses 398 cup made of either metal or plastic within which lies
24.7.1 Acetabular Liner Wear 398 a polyethylene liner.
24.7.2 Giant Cell Granulomatous Reaction to Cement
or Polyethylene Particles 399
The femoral component includes a stem com-
24.7.3 Heterotopic Bone 399 posed of metal and of a femoral head and neck com-
24.7.4 Dislocation 400 ponent being composed of either metal or ceramic.
24.7.5 Abductor Avulsion 400 The femoral component articulates with the poly-
24.8 Ultrasound 400 ethylene liner held within the cup of the acetabular
24.9 Computed Tomography 401
24.10 Magnetic Resonance Imaging 401
component. Cemented and noncemented fixation
References 402 methods are employed at either site. Cement fixation
employs methylmethacrylate cement, while unce-
mented approaches employ bonding by either bone
ingrowth to beads coating the prostheses surfaces or
by direct chemical bonding induced by hydroxyapa-
tite coating of the prostheses surfaces.
More recently a modification in total hip arthro-
plasty has been introduced termed “resurfacing” in
which the surfaces of the femoral head and of the
acetabulum are replaced by metallic components
(Fig. 24.1). In this setting the metal coated femoral
S. Eustace, MD; P. Cunningham, MD head articulates with a metal cup lining the acetabu-
Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae and Cappagh lum. Such metal-on-metal articulation is thought to
National Orthopaedic Hospital, Finglas, Dublin 11, Ireland increase release of metallic particles to the blood-
394 S. Eustace and P. Cunningham
24.6.1
Arthrographic Appearance and Aspiration
Arthrography
Fig. 24.5. Radiograph of a patient with bilateral total hip
replacements, on the right with cement fixation of the femo-
ral component and uncemented fixation of the acetabular
Infection is suggested when contrast injected at
component, on the left, with uncemented fixation of both the arthrography outlines an irregular joint capsule,
acetabular and femoral components reflecting marginal inflammatory changes, and
398 S. Eustace and P. Cunningham
when it fills nonbursal cavities, sinus tracts and be 90% when combined with technetium-99m MDP
abscesses. Joint aspiration is routinely undertaken bone scintigraphy (subtraction technique). Indium
at the time of arthrography, and although one imaging combined with marrow labelling techne-
may assume that such a technique represents the tium sulphur colloid also improves both the sensi-
gold standard, false-positive results are commonly tivity and specificity of the technique.
encountered (positive predictive value, 54.2%) (skin Emerging data now suggests a potential role for
commensals). False-negative results are consider- PET (positron emission tomography) in the assess-
ably less frequent (negative predictive value, 99.2%) ment of lower limb prosthesis infection. PET scan-
(Fig. 24.3) (Weissman 1990). ning employs positron emitting fluorine labelled
to glucose which is taken up by actively metabolis-
ing cells via glut 1 receptors and overexpression of
24.6.2 hexokinase in inflammatory and malignant cells.
Scintigraphy Preliminary reports suggest that PET sensitivity for
detecting infection is more accurate in hip than in
Scintigraphy is frequently undertaken in patients knee prostheses with a sensitivity of 90%, and speci-
with suspected orthopaedic hardware infection. ficity of 89.3% (Zhuang et al. 2000).
Despite initial enthusiasm for the technique and
despite developments of tomographic scintigraphic
imaging or single photon emission computed tomog-
raphy (SPECT), studies evaluating sensitivity of scin- 24.7
tigraphy have been unconvincing (Datz and Thorne Specific Complications of Joint Prostheses
1986; Johnson et al. 1988; Streule et al. 1988).
Increased uptake of radiopharmaceutical may 24.7.1
be seen in normal prostheses for up to 1 year fol- Acetabular Liner Wear
lowing surgery, reflecting induced marginal osteo-
blastic activity. In such a way, it is only after 1 year Wear of the polyethylene cup lining the acetabu-
that concentration of radiopharmaceutical may be lar component of hip replacements is a significant
considered abnormal, and that scintigraphy may be cause of morbidity, and after loosening represents
used effectively to indicate loosening or infection. the commonest cause of mechanical component fail-
Focal uptake of radiopharmaceutical is more com- ure. Rarely, particularly in young men, liner breaks
monly observed in patients with loose components, down acutely and fracture or remodelling occurs
whereas diffuse uptake is more commonly observed within 1 year of surgery. More commonly, poly-
in infection. These patterns, however, are merely ethylene liner breaks down gradually over years,
trends and are not absolutely specific (Datz and reflecting chronic friction at the articular surface
Thorne 1986). (Fig. 24.6).
Attempts to improve the specificity of scintigra- Two radiographic methods are used to quantify
phy have seen the evaluation of both gallium and the amount of wear, grossly indicated by the devel-
indium-labelled white cells. Gallium-67 is limited by opment of an eccentric position of the femoral head
low sensitivity (37%) (Aliabidi et al. 1989); however, within the acetabular cup. The first involves measur-
a positive study or focal accumulation strongly sug- ing the width of the narrowest part of the socket in
gests infection. Indium is felt to be more sensitive; the weight-bearing area and subtracting it from the
however, interpretation of increased uptake must width of the widest part in the non-weight-bearing
take account of increased marrow uptake of labelled area, and the result halved. Liner wear is detected by
white cells that occurs because of marrow displace- serial measurements. The second method involves
ment incurred at the time of surgery. Indium uptake measuring the thickness of the acetabular compo-
is demonstrated diffusely adjacent to bone ingrowth nent on the latest radiograph and comparing this
components in 80% at up to 2 years following surgery, with the thickness measured on the immediate post-
although the uptake is less marked than is seen on operative radiograph (average wear is reported as
technetium bone scintigraphy. Similarly, increased 1.5 mm per year). A considerably less frequent cause
uptake of indium has been previously observed in of acetabular component failure (press fit mecha-
aseptic granulation tissue surrounding loose pros- nism) is loosening between the liner and the metal-
theses. Johnson et al. (1988) found the sensitivity backed component resulting in liner subluxation
of indium imaging to be 88% and the specificity to and even dislocation (Fig. 24.7).
Hip Prosthesis 399
24.7.5
Abductor Avulsion
Fig. 24.9. Frontal radiograph of a patient with bilateral total
hip replacements shows gross expansile osteolysis surround- An anterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty
ing the acetabular components bilaterally, worse on the right is favoured to avoid the complications of nonunion
secondary to granulomatous reactions of the greater trochanteric osteotomy and separa-
tion of the trochanter. This approach involves the
incision of the gluteus medius, vastus lateralis and
gluteus minimus to gain access to the joint capsule
without the need for trochanteric osteotomy. These
muscles are then reattached at their trochanteric
insertion with postoperative restoration of abductor
muscle function and gait. However, patients occa-
sionally present with prosthesis failure for which
no cause can be found by traditional investigations.
MRI is the investigation of choice in patients with
clinically suspected abductor muscle avulsion as it
cannot be diagnosed by radiography, arthrography,
scintigraphy or CT. MRI in patients who have under-
gone joint replacement may be limited by suscepti-
bility-induced loss of signal adjacent to the metal
Fig. 24.10. Uncemented total hip replacement with gross prosthesis. Satisfactory reduction in susceptibility
mature heterotopic bone formation limiting hip mobility artefact, allowing assessment of soft tissues adjacent
to prostheses, may now be achieved by appropriate
of the heterotopic bone is undertaken. In this set- orientation of slice-select and frequency-encoded
ting it is critical to prove that the heterotopic bone gradients, in conjunction with tissue excitation
is mature Radiographs are employed to assess het- using RARE-based sequences (Twair et al. 2003;
erotopic bone formation prior undertaking surgical Eustace et al. 1998b; White et al. 2000). Artefact
resection. No change in configuration over 3 months reduction is particularly effective when prostheses
is considered a marker of maturity. Similar uptake are cobalt chrome- or titanium-based rather than
of Tc99m in the heterotopic bone as in native bone steel-based. Using these techniques allows clear
indicates maturity. Resolution of oedema indicates identification of abductor muscle avulsion from the
maturity at MRI (Eustace 1999). greater trochanteric attachments (Fig. 24.11).
24.7.4
Dislocation 24.8
Ultrasound
Dislocation is an uncommon complication of hip
arthroplasty with most cases occurring in the first Ultrasound is particularly useful for visualising
few weeks postoperatively. Dislocation is usually periprosthetic fluid collections. In the setting of
posteriorly with anterior dislocation being very rare. infection it can be used to evaluate for soft tissue
It most frequently occurs secondary to a posterior abscess and other extra-articular collections includ-
Hip Prosthesis 401
ing haematoma (van Holsbeeck et al. 1994). Ultra- The ability to image with very thin slices reduces
sound may be useful in guiding percutaneous needle artefacts produced by averaging partial volume and
aspiration of a joint or a soft tissue collection. allows detailed reconstruction in any plane. Con-
tinuing investigations evaluating the bone-metal
interface show that MDCT produces a decrease in
metal artefact (Puri et al. 2002). A recent study has
24.9 reported the value of CT in assessing focal osteolysis
Computed Tomography in total hip replacement (Park et al. 2004).
pulse, which corrects for signal loss due to static mag- teardrop and its relevance to acetabular migration. Clin
netic field homogeneities, such as those induced by Orthop 236:199–204
metal prosthesis. Diffusion related signal loss may Hardy DC, Reinus WR, Trotty WG et al (1988) Arthrography
after total hip arthroplasty: utility of post ambulation
be reduced by increasing the echo train length and radiographs. Skeletal Radiol 17:20–23
decreasing the interecho spacing (Tartaglino et al. Harris WH, Penenberg BL (1987) Further follow up on socket
1994; Eustace et al. 1998a; Suh et al. 1998). MRI can fixation using a metal backed acetabular component for
be used to diagnose complications such as loosen- total hip replacement: a minimum 10 year follow up study.
ing, infection and giant cell reaction but these can J Bone Joint Surg 69A:1140–1143
Hendrix RW, Wixson RL, Rana NA et al (1983) Arthrography
all be identified using conventional methods. How- after total hip arthroplasty: a modified technique used in
ever, abductor muscle avulsion as a cause of failed the diagnosis of pain. Radiology 148:647–652
hip prosthesis can only be diagnosed using MRI as Hu H, He HD, Foley WD et al (2000) Four multidetector-row
described above (Twair et al. 2003). helical CT: image quality and volume coverage speed.
Radiology 215:55–62
Johnson JA, Christie MJ, Sandler MP et al (1988) Detection of
occult infection following total joint arthroplasty using
sequential technetium-99m HDP bone scintigraphy and
References indium-111 WBC imaging. J Nucl Med 29:1347–1353
Kaplan PA, Montesi SA, Jardon OM et al (1988) Bone ingrowth
Aliabidi P, Tumeh SS, Weissman BN et al (1989) Cemented total hip prostheses in asymptomatic patients: radiographic
hip prosthesis: Radiographic and scintigraphic evalua- features. Radiology 169:221–227
tion. Radiology 173:203–206 Park JS, Ryu KN, Hong HP, Park YK, Chun YS, Yoo MC (2004)
Anderson LS, Staple TW (1973) Arthrography of total hip Focal osteolysis in total hip replacement. Skeletal Radiol
replacement using subtraction technique. Techn Notes 33:632–640
109:470–471 Puri L, Wixson RL, Stern SH et al (2002) Use of helical com-
Bassett LW, Loftus AA, Mankovich NJ (1985) Computer-pro- puted tomography for the assessment of acetabular oste-
cessed subtraction arthrography. Radiology 157:821 olysis after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am
Bergstrom B, Lidgren L, Lindberg L (1974) Radiographic 84A:609–614
abnormalities caused by postoperative infection follow- Resnik CS, Fratkin MJ, Cardea A (1986) Arthroscintigraphic
ing total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 99:95–102 evaluation of the painful total hip prosthesis. Clin Nucl
Campeau RJ, Hall MF, Miale A Jr (1976) Detection of total hip Med 11:242–244
arthroplasty complications with Tc-99m pyrophosphate. Robertson DD, Yuan J, Wang G et al (1997) Total Hip Prosthe-
J Nucl Med 17:526 sis metal-artifact suppression usinh iterative deblurring
Chandler HP, Reineck FT, Wixson RL et al (1981) Total hip reconstruction. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21:293–298
replacements in patients younger than 30 years old. J Streule K, De Schrijver M, Fridrich R (1988) 99Tcm-labeled
Bone Joint Surg 65A:1426–1434 HAS-nanocolloid versus 111-In oxine-labeled granu-
Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJW (2004) Metal-on-metal locytes in detecting skeletal septic process. Nucl Med
resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years Commun 9:59–67
with osteoarthritis. JBJS (Br) 86B:177–184 Suh JS, Jeong EK, Shin KH et al (1998) Minimizing artifacts
Datz FL, Thorne DA (1986) Effect of chronicity of infection on caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental
the sensitivity of the In-111-labeled leucocyte scan. AJR and clinical studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:1207–1213
Am J Roentgenol 147:809–812 Tartaglino LM, Flanders AE, Vinitski S et al (1994) Metallic arti-
Engh CA, Bobyn JD (1988) The influence of stem size and extent facts on MR images of the postoperative spine: reduction
of porous coating in femoral bone resorption after primary with fast spin-echo techniques. Radiology 190:565–569
cementless hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 231:7–28 Twair A, Ryan M, O’Connell M et al (2003) MRI of failed total
Engh CA, Massin P (1989) Cementless total hip arthroplasty hip replacement caused by abductor muscle avulsion. AJR
using the anatomic medullary locking stem: results using Am J Roentgenol 181:1547–1550
survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop 249:141–158 Van Holsbeeck MT, Eyler WR, Sherman LS et al (1994) Detec-
Eustace SJ (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging of orthopaedic tion of infection in loosened hip prostheses: efficacy of
trauma, 1st edn. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Phila- sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163:381–384
delphia Weissman BN (1990) Current topics in the radiology of joint
Eustace S, Jara H, Goldberg R et al (1998a) A comparison of replacement surgery. Radiol Clin North Am 28:1111–1134
conventional spin-echo and turbo spin-echo imaging of White MW, Kim JK, Mehta M et al (2000) Complications of
soft tissue adjacent to orthopaedic hardware. AJR Am J total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging – initial experience.
Roentgenol 170:455–458 Radiology 215:254–262
Eustace S, Shah B, Mason M (1998b) Imaging orthopaedic Yoder SA, Brand RA, Pederson DR et al (1988) Total hip ace-
hardware with an emphasis on hip prostheses. Orthop tabular component position affects component loosening
Clin North Am 29:67–84 rates. Clin Orthop 220:79–87
Firooznia H, Baruch H, Seliger G et al (1974) The value of sub- Zhuang H, Duarte PS, Pourdehnad M et al (2000) Excluion
traction in hip arthrography after total hip replacement. of chronic osteomyelitis with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose
Bull Hosp Jt Dis 35:36–41 positron emission tomographic imagimg. Clin Nucl Med
Goodman SB, Adler SJ, Fyhrie DP et al (1988) The acetabular 25:281–284