Professional Documents
Culture Documents
P 191 PV 2 N 4 e 110 Eifh 131 LN 01 Ki 99
P 191 PV 2 N 4 e 110 Eifh 131 LN 01 Ki 99
RAÚL OLIVEIRA
© 2014 TACTICAL
PERIODIZATION
THE SECRETS OF SOCCER MOST EFFECTIVE TRAINING METHODOLOGY
TACTICAL PERIODIZATION EXPLAINED IN SIMPLE TERMS SO THAT ALL COACHES MAY HAVE ACCESS TO THE
TRAINING METHOD USED BY COACHES LIKE JOSÉ MOURINHO, ANDRÉ VILLAS-BOAS, CARLOS CARVALHAL, LEONARDO
JARDIM, ETC... IN THIS FIRST BOOK YOU WILL GET THEORICAL INFORMATION THAT WILL GIVE YOU A STARTING POINT TO
APPLY TACTICAL PERIODIZATION IN YOUR OWN TEAM. HOPE YOU ENJOY THE READING.
WEBSITE: WWW.RAUL-OLIVEIRA.WEBNODE.PT
Index
1 - Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 5
5.3 - Principle of "disassembly" the game and hierarchical organization of the principles of play . 38
7.4 - Day 4 (Thursday): Large fraction of the “play”. Complex dynamic of the “play”. ....................... 59
8.6 - Excess of interest in the timings of exercitation, volumes and intensities ................................ 73
10 - Bibliography ............................................................................................................................................ 81
Extra - Interview with Vitor Frade the creator and developer of Tactical Periodization Method ................. 85
1 - Introduction
"I
heard of physical breaks and soon I found myself
thinking that my crusade is going to be really hard. I just
cannot make people realize that this does not exist.
Being in shape is not physical. Being in shape is much more than that. The
physical is the least important in the scope of sports shape. Without organization
and talent in the operation of a model of play, deficiencies are explicit, but they
have little to do with the physical shape. And our commentators / reporters, as
almost always, continue to negatively influence the opinion of those who, in their
homes, need to be guided in their absorption capacity or understanding of the
game. "
José Mourinho (2005)
"F
ootball requires the adoption of a philosophy by those
who have greater responsibility in leading the team. This
philosophy of the play, and therefore, of training
requires a logical chain of the process evolution in which the concept of
specificity will have to be present. There is the need that everything is
connected, forming a very specific reality that in its essence is already very
complex - the model of play "
Guilherme Oliveira (1991)
Soccer is a sport with many specific characteristics that make it a sport whose
training should be carefully planned and analyzed. The game of football is born and raised in
the nature of the confrontation between two complex systems, two teams, and it is
characterized by the alternation of successive states of order and disorder, stability and
instability, uniformity and variety (Garganta, 2001). As such, there are a number of steps
that a coach should go through to prepare his team for the competition as best as possible
(Oliveira, 2005).
Quinta (2003) stated that "there is little soccer training and, and when it is done, it
is carried out in a haphazard manner, without objectives, programs or schedules in the
short, medium and long term. The teaching / coaching of soccer, in most cases, is done
without a program and / or set methods, not stipulating the achievement of individual and
collective goals, in other words, not looking for players and teams to achieve a given level
or teaching them the best way to do this or that individual or collective tactical-technical
action".
Tracking the need for specialization of soccer agents it has been registered a rising
number of publications and "branches of sports training" aiming at a greater specialization
and specificity in the approach of the soccer game. According to Garganta (2001) mainly
from the eighties onwards, important initiatives were developed with the aim of
systematizing knowledge in soccer, which resulted in the organization of congresses, at
European and global level, and the increase in soccer publications.
Over the last few seasons a lot has been speculated about the current training
methodologies in the national football leagues, largely because of the appearance of the
"Mourinho phenomenon" that has brought with him methodologies for many people targeted
as innovative and, specially, results of international quality. So the models concerning the
indivisibility of factors in training and the need for a methodology of integrated training
advocated by authors such as Queiroz (1986), Guilherme Oliveira (1991), Garganta (1995) and
Castelo (2000) returned to be the highest level the "soccer discussion".
This is a term (integrated training) according to Losa et al. (2006) that is almost
worn out from so much use, although almost always poorly, ambiguous and superfluously
addressed. Poorly because the issue is not that you have to include perception, decision,
etc.., But the fact that the stimuli, may be bigger or smaller, but should always be specific to
the game. Ambiguous because one thing is training with the ball and other thing is soccer
training, this are absolutely distinct realities. Finally, superfluous because the practice has
always emerged and will emerge from prior deeply organized theory, and in this case
almost always the proposal was directly practical.
According to Oliveira et al. (2006) as it is usually used the integrated training does
not truly break the logic of "standard practice". The "training with ball" serves only as a
mean of simulating the physical training, and not as an imperative to the building up of the
model of play and the principles of play that the coach wants for the team.
Guilherme Oliveira (2003) states that before any other task, the coach must
introspect about his soccer ideas. From this self-reflection it should "be born" clear ideas
of how we want "our" team to play, covering from the general to the most particular
aspects.
Before the definition of a methodology or any "type" training the coach should have
a clearly defined style of play.
Mourinho (2001) states that the training process should always be an "exponent of
the principle of specificity. Specificity / model of play and not just a specificity / soccer".
Still on the subject Losa et al. (2006) argue that when it comes to technical-tactical,
technical-physical training and so on... it comes to joining or add things or parts, that for
such, had to be separated in advance. Therein lies the basic error of the conventional
planning. Garganta et al. (1996) refers equally, that football is a multidimensional
phenomenon and therefore irreducible to any of the dimensions of performance that
contribute to its expression. When referring to the integrated training, Losa et al. (2006)
address the training to the theory of dynamical systems, that is, to say that the whole is
more than the simple sum of the parts because, as mentioned by Garganta (2001), in highly
complex systems operating in random environments, as those which exist in a soccer game,
the artificial separation of the factors that contribute to athletic performance are proved to
be inoperative.
Technical Tactical
Psychological Physical