Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Organizational Behaviour-Final
Organizational Behaviour-Final
Introduction
In 1991, a research project was launched which was similar to Hofstede’s research,
called Global Leadership and Organisational Behaviour Effectiveness (GLOBE). The
Global Leadership and Organisational Behaviour Effectiveness (GLOBE) had a
research team that involved 170 researchers from around 60 countries globally.
The objective of the project was to study the complex relationships between culture,
social cohabitation, organizational effectiveness, leadership behavior, and the economic
success of societies in different nations.
● Institutional collectivism
● Uncertainty avoidance
● In-group collectivism
● Power distance
● Performance orientation
● Gender egalitarianism
● Assertiveness
● Humane orientation
GLOBE researchers started with the notion that different cultures have different
distinguishing attributes. This was done with a target to distinguish the most suitable,
apt, effective, and thoroughly acceptable organizational and leadership practices within
a culture. By doing this the researchers had concluded that societal culture has a direct
and proportionate impact on the organizational culture. A similar conclusion was drawn
by Hofstede as well.
The GLOBE framework outlines the clusters of varied countries within the world with
their preferred leadership profiles supported the culture of the region, the well-liked
profiles emphasize what each manager must have in their skill sets to market their
management roles as they perform their duties in various parts of the globe and
because of GLOBE study, managers can learn the culture of a given region as they
prepare to require duties. The success of a manager equals the success of the
organization and by understanding the culture of the environment, management will
always work to support the preference of the people hence the organization will
eventually succeed.
The globe research involves a broad study that compares the qualities of operative
leadership across top management teams and directors of organizations across
cultures and countries. The GLOBE study's researchers are primarily interested in how
organizational culture affects leadership behavior and whether organizational
performance is influenced by leadership styles to management expectations.
This study's results are important because they help managers understand the
connection between culture and organizational performance.
The culture refers to the traditions and principles that have existed in an organization for
a long time, as well as the staff's beliefs and the unanticipated importance of their jobs,
both of which can affect their attitudes and actions.
Above all, the results support managers by reinforcing the significance of their positions
to organizational outcomes, the significant impact of culture on society's leadership
expectations, and the importance of matching their actions to each society's leadership
expectations. Managers will have a positive effect by understanding this relationship
from this GLOBE analysis.
As per the GLOBE study, leadership acceptance may be a function of the interaction
between culturally endorsed implicit leadership theories (CLTs) and leadership
attributes and behaviors. Some leadership attributes could also be conflicting with CLTs
while few others might not be so. That leadership attributes that agree with CLTs are
going to be more accepted than others. The project identified six global CLT
leadership dimensions.
These are:
● Autonomous leadership
● Charismatic/value-based leadership
● Self-protective leadership
● Participative leadership
● Human-oriented leadership
● Team-oriented leadership
Charismatic leadership: it is the degree to which a leader can inspire and motivate
other people around him or her.
Power Distance: The belief that force would be distributed uniformly among members
of an organization.
Collectivism II (In-Group): This shows how much pride, duty, and cohesion people
have in their organizations.
Humane Orientation: How much an organization respects and honors individuals who
are honest, selfless, sympathetic, adoring, and kind to others.
Assertiveness: how much the association's employees are constructive, bellicose, and
forceful in their relational partnerships.
Conclusion
GLOBE is the most detailed study to date that has observed the relationship between
community and pioneer movement in a variety of communities and associations, using a
variety of quantitative and subjective pointers and techniques.
Answer 2
Introduction
Cross-functional team- Employees from the same organizational level but separate
work areas or divisions make up a cross-functional team. These teams are created for
specific purposes and are dissolved once the mission is completed.
For example, when an organization decides to enter a new market, the heads of the
organization's various divisions, such as manufacturing, marketing, and finance,
collaborate to determine the organization's viability in that market.
Self-managed team- It is a team that is deemed capable of handling routine issues and
therefore does not need to report to its team leader regularly.
Supervised team-It is a team that operates directly under the direction of a boss or
manager.
Virtual team- It does not exist physically, but it functions by teleconferencing and
videoconferencing. Such teams gained importance because team members based in
various locations were unable to physically meet in a single location.
Problem-solving team- It is a group of employees from the same department who
meet once a week to discuss work-related problems such as quality issues.
Teamwork makes the dream a reality, but it can be difficult sometimes. Working
together and looking out for each other's backs is what teamwork entails. Effective
teamwork isn't teamwork until someone collaborates and there are enough obstacles to
overcome.
A team is similar to a chain in that it can only stay strong and powerful if all of its ties are
strong. If either of the links (or team members) fails, it can cause big problems for the
entire team.
For creating effective and efficient teams, an organization needs to take into account
the following aspects:
● Clear goals: Organizational goals should be transparent and distinct for all team
members to understand their job obligations.
● Relevant skills: Certain important skills should be retained in mind when forming
a team to achieve team goals more easily.
● Mutual trust: It ensures the overall performance of the team. When team
members trust one another, they work well together to accomplish team goals.
Apart from the above factors, a manager must also avoid the undesirable traits in order
to manage and build successful teams:
● Reduce group pressure and superiority among team members, as this will
reduce free thinking and speech, stifling great potential ideas of team members.
● Avoid having a single person exert control over the entire team.
● Avoid team dynamics because decisions reached by team members due to
political power would have an impact on the overall team goals and
effectiveness.
● Avoid distracting team members from the team's key goals and objectives.
● Avoid social cohesion in teams as it contributes to undesirable solutions that
would affect the organization.
Conclusion
It's one thing to have a team; it's but another to have teamwork and coordination. A
team that works well together will excel and achieve great things.
Answer 3
3 a)
Introduction
The reinforcement theory has four elements, which are explained below:
Conclusion
3 b)
Introduction
The reinforcement should take place immediately or shortly after the student's
response. At first, positive reinforcement should be provided for each correct response,
and then less frequently. When the desired behavior is not shown, the reinforcement
must be eliminated.
For example, candy machines are examples of continuous reinforcement since we earn
candy in exchange for putting in money. However, if a candy machine fails to provide
candy twice in a row, we will most likely stop trying.
Slot machines, for example, run on a part-time basis in casinos. They give money after
an undetermined number of games. As a result, slot players are more likely to keep
playing slots in the hope of winning money in the next round.
We can further classify intermittent reinforcement schedule into four different types:
Variable ratio schedule: Employees are rewarded after a variable number of responses
rather than a set number of responses in the variable-ratio schedule. In this schedule
sort, the number of responses tends to cluster around a specific average. This allows a
company to motivate its employees to perform well.
Conclusion