Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bbmc4103 - Change Management
Bbmc4103 - Change Management
No Topic Page
5.0 Conclusion 12
References 16
1.0 INTRODUCTION OF THE SELECTED ORGANISATION
UMW Toyota Motor Sdn. Bhd. (UMWT) is the appointed Toyota distributor, assembler
and exporter of Toyota vehicles in Malaysia. The company was founded in October 1982
as Sejati Motor, prior to being renamed UMW Toyota Motor in October 1987. UMW
Toyota Motor is a joint venture between Malaysia-based United Motor Works (UMW), and
the Toyota Motor Corporation (TMC) and Toyota Tsusho Corporation of Japan. UMWT
wholly owns Assembly Services Sdn. Bhd. (ASSB), the exclusive assembler of Toyota
passenger and commercial vehicles in Malaysia. They are also the official distributor of
Lexus vehicles in Malaysia since 2006. Prior to 1968, Malaysian market Toyota models
were only imported as complete built up (CBU) units. In the 1960s, the Malaysian
government began to emphasise industrialisation, then viewed as a more dependable
economic sector for employment and economic growth. In May 1964, the Malaysian
government enacted a policy to encourage the local assembly of vehicles and
manufacturing of automotive components. The new policy made complete built up (CBU)
cars more expensive through the addition of import duties, and licenses were issued to
various car companies who were interested in setting up local assembly plants. In the 1970s,
Malaysia experienced an economic boom as a result of increased industrialisation. Japanese
companies heavily invested in Malaysia during this period, and Toyota was one of several
Japanese firms which contributed to the development of Malaysia's automotive industry.
Local assembly of the Toyota Corolla and Toyota Corona commenced in February 1968 at
the Champion Motors (CM) plant in Shah Alam. Champion Motors was renamed as
Assembly Services Sdn. Bhd. (ASSB) in April 1975. Over the course of the 1970s,
Assembly Services benefited from significant technology transfer from Toyota. Production
engineers from Toyota contributed to the design of ASSB's plant and advised on the
assembly of vehicles. Later in March 1980, Toyota set up a representative office in Kuala
Lumpur, and in October 1982, Sejati Motor was established through a joint venture between
the Toyota Motor Corporation and United Motor Works (UMW). In October 1987, Sejati
Motor was renamed to UMW Toyota Motor (UMWT), while ASSB remained a subsidiary
of UMWT ever since, as the exclusive assembler of Toyota vehicles in Malaysia. Another
ASSB manufacturing plant at Bukit Raja, Klang rolled out its first car on 10 January 2019
which was a Toyota Vios. This plant will operate alongside the existing plant at Shah Alam
and during its initial face can have an annual output of 50,000 vehicles.
1
2.0 TYPES OF ENVIRONMENT AND FOCUS OF CHANGE BY THE
ORGANISATION
Organisational change means to the modification of the existing organisation to enhance
its effectiveness and efficiency. It introduces the basic concepts of organisational change
and describes the various forms of change, the sources of change (internal and external)
and the focus of change (people, structure, and technology). Organisational are confronted
almost daily with the need for change. Over the last few decades many new products and
services have been introduced into the market; local markets have become global markets;
protected industries have been opened up to competition; and public institutions have either
been privatised. In simple words, change has become both pervasive and prevalent. Hence,
obviously change is invisible in an organisations and managing change effectively is a
major challenge faced by organisations. There are two types of environment which are
turbulent environment (culture, structure and process), and stable environment
(attitudes/behaviour, task and procedures).
5
3.0 DESCRIPTION ON THE FRAMEWORK FOR CHANGE DEVELOPED BY
BURNES (2004)
Figure below shown four quadrants, each of which has a distinct focus in terms of change.
The top half of the figure, Quadrants 1 and 2, represents situations where organisations
operating in a turbulent environment need to make large-scale, organization wide changes
to either their culture or structure. Meanwhile, the bottom half of the figure, Quadrants 3
and 4 is representing situations where organisations operating in a stable environment need
to make small-scale, piecemeal and localized adjustments to attitudes and behaviours or
tasks and procedures.
This concludes the left-hand side of the figure, Quadrants 1 and 4, represents situations
where the main focus of change is the human side of the organisation, i.e. cultural and
attitude or behavioural change. These sorts of changes are likely to be best achieved through
a relatively slow, participative approach, rather than a rapid and directive or coercive. The
right-hand side of Figure, Quadrants 2 and 3 represents situations where the primary focus
is on achieving changes to the technical side of the organisation, i.e. structures, processes,
tasks and procedures. These types of changes tend to be less participative in nature and
relatively more rapid in their execution.
6
1) Quadrant 1
It identifies situations where the culture of an organisation operating in a turbulent
environment is no longer appropriate. For such relatively large-scale initiatives, where
the main focus is culture change at the level of the entire organisation or large parts of
it, the Emergent approach (e.g. Kanter et al’s Long March), which emphasises both the
collaborative and political dimensions of change, is likely to be most appropriate. The
attempts to change culture through top-down, directive or coercive initiatives are liable
to fail. Therefore, where they are to be successful, such forms of change are less likely
to be consciously embarked on and more likely to ‘emerge’ from a host of initiatives
that arise in response to changes in the environment, though this does not necessarily
exclude some elements of deliberation and guidance from senior managers. Although
the organisation may be operating in a turbulent environment and, therefore, individual
elements of the cultural change may be rapid, the overall cultural transformation is
likely to be a slow process.
2) Quadrant 2
It relates to situations where the focus is on achieving major changes in structures and
processes at the level of the entire organisation (e.g. Kanter et al’s Bold Stroke).
Situations where such changes are required arise for a variety of reasons. It may be that
an organisation finds itself in serious trouble and needs to respond quickly to realign
itself with its environment. Alternatively, it may be that an organisation is not
experiencing a crisis, but that it perceives that it will face one unless it restructures itself
to achieve a better fit with its environment. In such cases, it may not be possible or
advisable to change the structure slowly or on a piecemeal basis and, therefore, a major
and rapid reorganisation is necessary. Because it involves the entire organisation or
major components of it, this is likely to be driven by the centre and to be the focus of a
political struggle, given that major structural changes are usually accompanied by major
shifts in the distribution of power. Therefore, the new structure will be imposed from
the top in a directive or even coercive way, depending on the balance between winners
and losers.
3) Quadrant 3
Q3 presents a different picture which represents organisations operating in a relatively
stable environment where changes to the technical side of the organisation tend to be
7
relatively small-scale and piecemeal and with few (if any) implications for behaviour
and attitudes. Such changes take place at the individual and group level rather than at
the level of the entire organisation. How these are managed will depend on the culture
of the organisation. In a traditional, bureaucratic organisation, a Tayloristic approach
may be adopted, i.e. specialist managers and engineers will identify the ‘best way of
working’ and impose it. In a more participative culture, such as a Japanese company, a
more collaborative approach may be appropriate, such as a Kaizen initiative that brings
together a team comprising workers and specialists. But either is possible and it should
be possible to achieve either in a relatively speedy fashion.
4) Quadrant 4
It covers relatively small-scale initiatives whose main objective is performance
improvement through attitudinal and behavioural change at the individual and group
level. Once again, organisations in this situation tend to be operating in a relatively
stable environment and, therefore, the Planned approach, with its emphasis on
collaboration and participation, is likely to be most appropriate. However, because such
changes focus on behavioural and attitudinal change, they tend to be relatively slow.
Leader Control High level of control; can Lower level of control; can
command results initiate and delegate
Initial Results Clear actions & impact Unclear actions & impact
9
Final Results Less predictable More dependable
Culture Impact Behavior and habits often Behavior and habits can
remain unchanged change
10
organization gives information to guide further action. The results are assessed on
the amount of information provided. Action research has the objective of assisting
companies with implementing their planned change. It also helps develop general
knowledge gathered from implementing the planned change so that it can be applied
to other companies.
c) Contemporary approaches to change
The contemporary approaches to change are culled from an action research model.
However, the difference here is that the member involvement is relatively high in
the change process. This includes educating the members of the organization about
their company and how they should change it to apply the planned change.
11
5.0 CONCLUSION
Good management is not just details left to technocrats. It is good for customers,
constituencies, and the public. Britain managed an Empire not because of a great leader at
the top, but because of an effective civil service well-trained in management. Some scholars
have argued that countries in Africa and other parts of the developed world that were once
governed by the British were left a legacy of administrative capabilities that make them
relatively better managed today. In contrast, bad management hurts everyone. It wastes
time and money. It fails to produce results while crowding out alternatives. Evidence of
managerial experience (and what was learned from it) would be a good prerequisite for
leadership. Lawyers and doctors must pass tests before practicing their professions, but
there is no managerial exam to pass in order to get a license to lead. That’s management.
Vision, symbolism, inspiration, and other items associated with leadership are vitally
important, no question about it. Let’s bring management skills back into leadership. While
asking managers to become more visionary, let us also insist that leaders should be able to
manage well by having all the concept and approach which are discussed earlier on top.
(4,344 words)
12
REFERENCES
UMW Toyota Motor. Wikipedia. Retrieved 05/11/2022 from
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UMW_Toyota_Motor
Wendy. S. (NB). What is an Organizational Environment? - Definition & Theory. Study.com.
Retrieved 05/11/2022 from https://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-an-
organizational-environment-definition-theory-quiz.html
Organizational choice and organizational change. Emerald Insight. Retrieved 05/11/2022 from
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/00251749710192075/full/html
Development of work organization and the rise of organization theory. World Supporter.
Retrieved 05/11/2022 from https://www.worldsupporter.org/en/chapter/40432-
summary-managing-change-burnes
What Is Emergent Strategy? With Benefits and Examples. Indeed Editorial Team. Retrieved
05/11/2022 from https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-
development/emergent-strategy-
definition#:~:text=Emergent%20strategy%20is%20an%20action,a%20pattern%20in
%20its%20habits.
Development of work organization and the rise of organization theory. World Supporter.
Retrieved 05/11/2022 from https://www.worldsupporter.org/en/chapter/40432-
summary-managing-change-burnes
Rosabeth. M. K. (2013). What Inexperienced Leaders Get Wrong (Hint: Management) Harvard
Business Review. Retrieved 05/11/2022 from https://hbr.org/2013/11/what-
inexperienced-leaders-get-wrong-hint-management
Rosabeth. M. K. (2013). BOLD STROKES vs. LONG MARCHES. Harvard Business Review.
Retrieved 05/11/2022 from https://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/cdo/_pdf/Bold-
Strokes-Long-Marches.pdf
Marshall. H. (2022). Kaizen: Understanding the Japanese Business. Investopedia.com.
Retrieved 05/11/2022 from
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/k/kaizen.asp#:~:text=Alex%20Dos%20Diaz-
,What%20Is%20Kaizen%3F,a%20gradual%20and%20methodical%20process.
13