Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Account Planning From Genesis To Revelat
Account Planning From Genesis To Revelat
Merry Baskin
David Pickton
Keywords
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of account planning by tracing its origins,
development and role from its genesis to its current status. Account planning grew out of
dissatisfaction with advertising agencies’ ability to meet the challenges they were facing in the
early 1960’s. It started out by combining elements of research and strategic planning to
inform creative development and to provide the guidance and direction needed to use
consumer insight to drive successful creative solutions.
Since those early beginnings, a changing advertising environment has fuelled account
planning’s exodus as it has been adopted internationally and by marketing communications
fields that extend beyond advertising.
While the paper brings us to the current day, account planning continues to evolve. It is
expected that the trend of adoption by a range of marketing communications specialist
agencies will persist but that a new account planning ‘revelation’ will be in the form of
independent strategy consultancies and increased client activities.
!1
This paper provides an introductory overview of account planning within the
context of a Special Issue of papers that will look at various aspects of the
account planning function. Its purpose is to trace the origins of account
planning, and identify its development and role from its genesis in the early
1960s in the UK to its current status in 2003.
While the paper principally brings us to the current day, it is noted that
account planning continues to evolve. It is expected that the trend of adoption
by a range of marketing communications specialist agencies will persist but
that a new account planning ‘revelation’ will be in the form of independent
marketing communications strategy consultancies.
INTRODUCTION
In the late 1970’s, the UK Account Planning Group (APG) was formed as a
collection of account planners, researchers and other like minded individuals.
Since its tentative beginnings, it has been adopted in agencies extending as
far as the US and Canada, Hong Kong, Australia, Scandinavia, Chile, Brazil,
China and various other parts of Europe. And these are just the countries that
!2
have approached the APG in the UK to start their own account planning
groups. It would be true to say that the UK remains the spiritual home of
account planning. As Baskin (2000), then Planning Director, J. Walter
Thompson and previous APG Chair, notes
Every client organisation and their agencies benefit from a disciplined system
for devising their advertising and marketing communications strategy(ies) and
enhancing their ability to produce outstanding creative solutions that will be
effective in the marketplace. In simple terms, account planners are charged
with the task of “guiding or facilitating this process via the astute application of
knowledge and understanding about the market – customers and
consumers” (Baskin, 2001, p.3). Some may assert that such knowledge and
understanding should be expected of the client’s marketing manager and this
may hold more than a grain of truth. However, it is not only the development
of market understanding that defines the account planner’s job; it is also in the
application of that understanding to enhance creative development and the
marketing communications process. At the core of the task is the need to
understand customers and consumers and the brand to unearth a key insight
for the communications solution (create relevance) and in doing so, in a
crowded media environment, cut through the cynicism to connect with the
audience (create distinctiveness) in an effective and efficient way.
!3
However, through the 60s and beyond, in adopting marketing practices,
clients restructured their organisations to introduce their own marketing
departments and market research agencies grew to meet the increasing
demand for more continuous and sophisticated marketing research. Media
proliferation and increasing emphasis on multifarious marketing
communications activities has seen the growth of specialist communications
agencies and a questioning of the advertising agencies’ role as unbiased,
media neutral marketing consultants. The strategic ‘high ground’ and position
was being lost by the ad agencies and no doubt there were many who
recognised that some retaliatory response would be needed.
It may be suggested that this came in the forms of Stephen King of JWT and
Stanley Pollitt of BMP who are the undisputed forefathers of account planning.
In separate agencies, but at pretty much the same time, they started a
revolution in the advertising world, one that has been called “the greatest
innovation in agency working practice since Bill Bernbach put art directors and
copywriters together in the 1950s (Feldwick, 2000, p.ix), and one that Jay
Chiat, pioneer of account planning in the USA, has referred to as “the best
new business tool ever invented” (Steel, 1998, p.42).
In 1964, King, dissatisfied with the workings of both the media and marketing
departments within his agency, developed a new system of working (the
Thompson T-Plan or Target Plan) which concentrated on combining consumer
research and insights to create more effective, creative advertising. He
believed that a more systematic, intellectual approach less reliant on ‘gut
feeling’ and intuition was needed which, through rigorous analysis of the
brand, would match marketing objectives to advertising strategy and, in so
doing, produce effective, creative campaigns (King, 1989).
Both King and Pollitt shared a desire to reorganize the media planning,
market research and marketing departments; King, initially by a process, and
Pollitt, via a person. Both were led towards the creation of a new department
and a new discipline. As D’Souza (1986) noted, although their principles were
similar, their methods of working differed. Many of today’s planners have been
trained in one or the other schools of planning but, increasingly, working
practices have become blurred as the established, ‘traditionally-structured’
agencies sought for ways of taking planners on board. Feldwick (2000)
negatively comments on this variety (and too typically, inappropriateness) of
working practices as lying at the root of
!4
“much of the criticism and misunderstanding of account planning …
where current practice often differs most from the original idea – the
planners have little knowledge of, and sometimes even no apparent
interest in, research; planning departments of two or three people
expected to serve a medium to large agency, and who, therefore,
however hard they work, cannot possible achieve the in-depth
knowledge of each account that Stanley (Pollitt) envisaged; planning
relationships with creatives and account management that are either
too cosy, or too remote”. (p. xii)
The term ‘account planning’ has been felt to be a misnomer by many, its
origins, as commented by Crosier et al (2003), being unclear. While they
propose that ‘Creative Planning’ might have been a more accurate description
as the role incorporated “from the outset ….. a significant input into the
development of creative strategy”, they also recognise that it “might have
antagonised the high profile creative directors of the day” (p.2). The name,
‘Account Planning’, was, in fact, coined by Tony Stead at a JWT awayday in
1968, attended by both media planners and account people from the
marketing department. As King’s new department was to comprise a hybrid -
selected folk from both disciplines, he simply merged the titles together. And
so, as Baskin (2001) observes, “we have been saddled with one of the most
obfuscatory job titles ever since” (p.2). In North America, the job titles of
‘brand planner’ and ‘strategic planner’ have been tried but none of these
appear to have been satisfactorily accepted as alternatives.
In 1986, some 20 plus years after the ‘launch’ of account planning, Sev
D’Souza (then of the agency Still Price Court Twivy D’Souza) attempted a
much needed and, subsequently, a much referenced, description of account
planning, it’s meaning within the industry and the origins of its development.
Indeed, in the 60s, the clients’ own emphasis on marketing and the move of
the market research function away from agencies to client companies who
“set up their own market research departments, devised their own research
programmes and commissioned research themselves” (Pollitt, 1979, p.29)
was a major reason for Pollitt to conceive of the need for account planning in
the first place. Ironically, as we moved towards the end of the millennium and
into the next, we have seen a downsizing of client marketing departments yet
no diminution of the need for strategic marketing communications thinking.
This, coupled with a highly fragmented and divergent mediascape in which
there are ever increasing ways in which clients can communicate with their
!5
target audiences (Pickton and Broderick, 2001; Franz, 2000), is placing ever
more importance on strategic thinking in helping differentiate brands (Crosier
et al, 2003) and, thereby, the role of account planning.
Concurrently, in the latter half of the 20th century, consumer attitudes were
changing and were doing so with increasing rapidity. This required far more
attention to be paid to the monitoring and evaluation of these attitudes and
their implications for advertising and creative development. Markets were
becoming more sophisticated and complex. Brand images were becoming
more important and self-evident. Advertising was an important function in
creating brand differentiation and positioning. With the increasing
sophistication of the marketplace and advertising’s role within in it, it was
becoming imperative to understand consumer attitudes and reactions to
advertising. The emotional reaction to advertising was being recognised and
the means to evaluate advertising’s impact gained in importance.
Convergence on account planning was as a consequence of all of these
features.
Collectively, these pressures have meant that clients have placed a premium
on high quality ‘planner thinking’ (Edwards, 1998). This has created
opportunities for account planners within agencies but it has also increased
threats from the growing aspirations of media planners within the media
independents who have split from agencies to vie for ‘brand custodianship’ in
the eyes of the client (Crosier et al), and from the marketing and management
consultancies who have extended their skills into marketing communications
planning.
But it should not be presumed that account planning has been universally
adopted. There are numerous agencies that do not employ account planners
and the adoption of the function varies in different countries, not least as their
marketing communications environments differ. Since the mid 1980s,
although the number of account planners in ad agencies has fluctuated, there
has not been a consistent increase over the nearly 20 years that have
followed. The proportion of account planners and researchers has remained
reasonably constant as a proportion of total advertising employees (IPA
2003).
!6
2003), “The continuing expansion of the account planning discipline beyond
the traditional ‘ad agency’ is something we have seen reflected in our
membership (APG) profile”.
While the foregoing discussion has outlined the origins and development of
account planning, little has so far been said about its roles. As may be
anticipated given the organic growth of the function within the industry, the
actual roles played by account planners are not consistent across all agencies
or incarnations. Crosier et al (2003) have identified four key factors that will
determine, or at least have impact on, these roles and how planning operates
in agencies: agency ethos, client type, agency size and agency location. The
authors also commented on the enormity of roles to be performed and the
difficulty involved in undertaking them all. For those who did, they coined the
term ‘super-planner’ and noted,
!7
▪ creative development stage
involving writing the creative brief to incorporate the brand positioning and
proposition, briefing the creative team, orchestrating diagnostic research on
creative ideas, evaluating creative ideas and discussing implications with the
creative team
▪ approval stage
involving working with the account team in gaining client approval
▪ post-campaign stage
involving tracking and evaluation
These four task stages can be mapped onto the roles identified later in Figure
1. He illustrated the account planner’s overall role by contrasting the
predispositions of the main players in the process,
In this way he was able to emphasise the account planner’s principal focus on
the target market (better still, the various target audience groups, but
emphasis then was still on a clear consumer focus) by bringing the ultimate
consumer’s perspective into the development of advertising as a ‘disciplined
and systematic approach to the creation of ads’. This very much reflected
both Pollitt’s and King’s ambitions. It is interesting to note, however, in these
still early days of account planning, the role was very much centred within
advertising agencies with the principal purpose of providing consumer insight
into the creative development of advertisements. For many, this remains its
raison d’être today while others, remaining true to its ontological origins, have
expanded the role to recognise its application and value to a much broader
array of marketing communications and to the total strategy process (not just
creative development). Thus, account planning is increasingly revealed to
benefit integrated marketing communications (or, using a currently favoured
term, media neutral planning) as a vital role within the total IMC planning and
implementation process.
Recognising its burgeoning growth, D’Souza did point out even in those
earlier writings that, “the way account planning works varies from agency to
agency and, even within an agency, from planner to planner” (p.1) depending
upon the particular environment and the skills of the planners concerned. The
same is clearly evident today as we see the adoption of account planning
practices across the range of communications agencies. Baldwin, planning
director at IMP direct marketing agency, (reported in Crawford, 1994) agues
that below-the-line planners have a much larger remit than planners in above-
the-line agencies and provides a pretty comprehensive list of activities.
“The first requirement of planners is that they are well rounded and
experienced marketing people. But on top of that they must have the
expertise in market analysis, thorough knowledge of what information
exists, consumer motivations, creative development, guarding the
brand, tracking and monitoring, loyalty programme construction, and
!8
media planning in the widest sense. This includes list buying, test
construction, targeting, segmentation, computer modelling and
response analysis. They must also possess an appreciation of what
advertising, direct marketing, sales promotion, sponsorship and PR can
be expected to contribute” (p36).
In her paper for the AGP, Baskin (2001) highlighted a range of roles for the
account planner in the modern agency. In Figure 1 these are referred to as
sub-roles which have been grouped under ‘meta-roles’ that describe the
principal functions that account planning incorporates. These may be
contrasted with the four key roles that Crosier et al (2003) saw as an ‘account
planning landscape’ which, they commented, were not necessarily performed
by all planners: ‘voice of the consumer’, ‘strategic pivot’, ‘creative catalyst’ and
‘client confidant’.
Researcher
Market researcher
Many account planners have their origins in market research. Jane Newman,
a widely recognised and respected American account planner, sees account
planning as ‘subsuming’ the agency market research function. From Pollitt’s
writings, it is clear how much emphasis he placed on this role within the
account planning function. Market research ‘craft skills’ may be described as
the backbone of the account planning function. Account planners need to be
conversant with all relevant quantitative and qualitative, secondary and
primary techniques as necessary parts of the total planner’s research
armoury. However, as identified by Hackley (2000), emphasis on this vital
research function of the account planner’s job can result in marginalising
planners within agencies as ‘mere’ researchers effectively relegating them as
a ‘backroom’ activity.
!9
customers, consumers, trade intermediaries and market influencers. From
this, an interpretation of the consumers’ relationships with the brand (and
other competing brands) can be determined as can be an understanding of
the factors influencing those relationships such as the impact of other target
audience influences.
Information centre
Knowledge is the bedrock of the planner’s craft. Knowing how to find material
quickly is key. Secondary data sources provide an understanding from which
primary research can be developed. The planner is an eclectic user of
information, is a knowledge manager and an information gatekeeper on behalf
of the agency.
Social anthropologist
With the increasing rate of change and with technology and information
moving at a breathtaking pace, it is important for creative and media people to
be in touch and au fait with rapidly evolving cultural and social trends to
ensure their idea’s relevance and reach to the target audience. Monitoring
cultural and social trends is a specialist task and the findings need to be fed in
early to brand and creative development. An understanding of the new media,
who uses it and how it is vital to the design and placing of the creative
message, should not be underestimated. Differentiating between mere
‘fashion’ and genuine cultural trends requires careful interpretation. In youth
markets, ‘coolhunting’ is becoming a ‘profession’ in its own right. (Editors note:
see ‘Coolhunting, Account Planning and Chillin’ with Aristotle’ by Nick
Southgate)
Soothsayer / futurologist
Research and market understanding requires not only a look backwards to
what has previously happened but also a view forward to predict the possible
future. This involves and understanding of past trends and likely future
outcomes.
!10
planner is able to augment the development process by adding a dimension
that might otherwise be relegated in favour of other perspectives. As Feldwick
(2000, p.xii) has succinctly put it, “Pollitt fought to create a way of working
where the primary purpose of research was consumer understanding in the
service of intelligent strategy and creative communication”. With the increase
in market, brand and competitive sophistication, the divergence of media
opportunities, the increasing emphasis on integrated marketing
communications and the broader strategic implications of marketing
communications beyond advertising, it is, perhaps, more appropriate to
emphasise the role of the account planner to incorporate a range of target
audiences as well as consumer insight into their overall function. For these
reasons, ‘voice of the market’ is preferred over the oft quoted role of ‘voice of
the consumer’ which now appears too narrow a focus even recognising its
ultimate importance.
Strategist
Strategic thinker / strategy developer
If the creative brief is the pinnacle of the planner’s tangible output, developing
the brand communications strategy is the precursor task. It follows logically
from the research and analytical phases and places the creative solution
within a wider marketing communications context. It is this recognition of the
importance of strategic focus that has given rise to the need to place
advertising and the development of creative treatments (as in the early
application of account planning) into a wider context of marketing
communications more generally and audiences beyond the consumer more
widely. By sharing the strategy with the team and gaining agreement with the
client in the early stages of campaign development, the creative and media
solutions that follow should be seen to be consistent and complementary to
the achievement of the desired outcomes. A shared strategy should enable
the account team to all ‘sing from the same hymnsheet’ and integrate all
relevant forms of marketing communications to meet the client’s overall goals
(Editor’s note: see Infusing Business and Brand Strategies into Account
Planning by Rob Osler).
!11
There are aspects of the planner’s job that sometimes entail sitting in a
darkened room with a towel around your head, mulling over deep thoughts,
These times may be accompanied by a passion or a fascination for a certain
theme. Original thinking is a powerful tool and when persuasively and
compellingly delivered can have a real impact on the business being worked
on and on the people being worked with.
Insight miner
Deriving insight from knowledge is one of the most important skills a planner
can possess. It is touching on the ‘essence’ and not simply a process of
conveying facts. These insights about the client’s business can come from a
variety of areas:
The consumer
The client’s culture
The marketplace/category
The competition
The brand (past, present, future) values
The product qualities
The advertising and communications conventions of the category
“Mining all these areas (whether sporting a virtual helmet with a lamp
on the front or not), peering into nooks and crannies without loosing
sight of the big picture in order to identify a key insight that can
transform a client’s business, is a real skill”. (Baskin, 2001 p.6)
NPD consultant
Involvement in new product development may not be open as an opportunity
to all but, especially for those agencies working in multinational packaged
brands, it is an area in which a great deal of investment is placed both in
product development and in marketing communications. This places the
account planner in one if the most interesting roles from positioning, naming
and testing through to final launch and evaluation.
Creative Catalyst
Some have referred to account planners as the ‘third creative’ alongside the
creative team and account manager. The role goes beyond being responsible
for producing the creative brief to being an active team member in building a
bridge between marketing communications/advertising strategies and creative
solutions.
!12
creatives require is a single-minded proposition out of which the creative
treatment can be developed. It is a major challenge for account planners to
respond to this requirement.
Knowledge applicator
Information may be a valuable asset but without appropriate application its
value is limited. It is in the application of knowledge that planners truly come
into their own. To paraphrase Jon Steel (1998), finding things out, filtering
them, re-thinking them laterally and then using that knowledge to help creative
people come up with a better idea easier or faster means that the planners
are doing their jobs properly and making a difference. Not making a difference
in this way is a hindrance and you should move out of the way and let
everyone else get on with it. In working in a team environment, account
planners have the task to create brand relevance and distinctiveness.
Brainstorming facilitator
Brainstorming and similar synectic creative ‘hot-house’ techniques can be
important in the overall planning process to collectively produce and share
creative ideas and gain commitment and synergy within the account team
from the outset of the planning process.
!13
relationship. As the details should be based as far as possible on objective
fact or logically defensible perspective, the planner should deliver these as
constructively as possible. What this aspect of the account planner’s role
emphasises is that sometimes it is necessary to take deliberately challenging
positions in order to develop from the status quo. It also emphasises the
account planner’s role in client liaison and in gaining client approval.
Conclusions
The actual account planning approach adopted will vary from agency to
agency and from planner to planner. How effectively the activities and roles
are performed are equally varied. Some are now arguing that to reach its
zenith, account planning needs to be undertaken in a media neutral, non-
biased environment that can only be offered by independent strategy
‘agencies’ that have no vested interest in any particular marketing
communications activity or media type. This may be account planning’s new
revelation as it continues to evolve.
▪ What was the process and evidence of strategic thinking which went
into the creative brief?
▪ How did this extend into creative development?
▪ Was the creative work original and relevant?
▪ Did it help inform and inspire media?
!14
The insight which made a difference can have come from one or more
sources, for example:
▪ Identifying the correct target audience
▪ A market or competitive analysis which led one to recognise alternative
communications
▪ Research which unlocked a better understanding of consumer
relationship with the brand
▪ Sensitive creative development research and/or communications
knowledge gained at that stage, which improves or alters the creative
execution.
The Awards in both years offered special prizes to what the APG adjudged as
critical areas of account planning justifying their own special merit:
▪ Best consumer insight
▪ Best strategic insight
▪ Best creative brief and briefing
▪ Best contribution to media thinking
▪ Most innovative use of qualitative research
▪ Best use of research.
References
!15
King, S. (1989) The Anatomy of Account Planning. Admap Vol 24, No.11 pp.
36-38
Kover, A.J. and Goldberg, S.M. (1995) The Games Copyrighters Play: conflict,
quasi-control, a new proposal. Journal of Advertising Research Vol 35 No 4
pp. 52-68
Kover, A.J., Goldberg, S.M. and James, W.L. (1995) Creativity vs.
Effectiveness? An integrating classification for advertising. Journal of
Advertising Research Vol 35 No 6 pp.29-41
Pickton, D and Broderick, A. (2001) Integrated Marketing Communications.
Harlow, Financial Times Prentice Hall
Pollitt, S. (1979) How I Started Account Planning in Agencies. Campaign (April
20) pp. 29-30
Steel, J. (1998) Truth, Lies and Advertising – The Art of Account Planning.
New York, Wiley
!16
Figure 1 Account Planner Roles
!17