https://synoptek.

com/insights/it-blogs/agile-scrum-waterfall-software-development-difference/

Overview

Water Fall Agile Scrum

The waterfall model, which Agile is a time-boxed, iterative The most popular process
was first applied to software approach to software delivery that framework for software
development, is still regarded aims to deliver software gradually development is Scrum, a subset of
as a traditional, tried-and-true throughout the project rather than all Agile. It is a lightweight
method for achieving specific at once near the end. 71% of framework. Similar to Agile, it
objectives. The waterfall businesses say they use agile employs an incremental
method entails a series of methodologies occasionally, methodology to speed up project
phases: conception, initiation, frequently, or always. completion.
analysis, design, construction,
testing,
production/implementation,
and maintenance. It
incorporates a sequential
design process in which
progress is seen as flowing
steadily downward (like a
waterfall).
Benefits
Waterfall
Stages are handled and finished
each in turn and they don't
cover.
When the requirements are
clearly understood, it works
well.
This method's linear structure
makes it simple to comprehend
and control.
The waterfall method works
best for projects with precise
goals and consistent
requirements.
The waterfall development
methodology might work best
for teams with inexperienced
project managers, project
teams, and teams whose
members change frequently.
Agile
Reduces waste by focusing
development efforts on high esteem
elements and lessening time to
showcase.
Team members take pleasure in
development work and like to see
their efforts put to good use.
improves the deliverables' quality
increases customer satisfaction
through the quick, consistent
delivery of functional software
Customers, developers, and testers
constantly interact with one
another, placing a greater emphasis
on people and interactions than on
processes and tools.
It is possible to introduce and carry
out impromptu changes.
Scrum
Even as the project is in full swing,
the sprint method enables
development that produces a
marketable product
The incremental delivery system
decreases the time to market while
potentially increasing revenue
because each backlog item
completed signifies a new product
release.
Since each sprint is reviewed
before moving on to the next,
testing is done continuously,
enabling teams to change the
project's scope or direction at any
time.
Because new increments are
created frequently, new changes
can be implemented for very little
money.
In contrast to the waterfall model,
very little planning is needed to
begin the project.
Challenges
Waterfall Agile Scrum

Before moving on to the next
phase, each phase must be
completely finished. Traditionally,
there is no procedure for going
back to change the project's
direction.
Can't handle change - Once an
application has entered the
testing phase, it can be very
challenging to change a
component that was poorly
thought out during the concept
stage.
The necessity of designing and
documenting is not prioritized.
The kind of decisions needed during
the development process can only be
made by senior programmers; the
model is challenging to use for less-
experienced programmers.
There is a high chance of scope creep,
which could result in never-ending
projects.
It is difficult to implement the
Scrum framework in large
teams.
If people aren't very
dedicated or cooperative,
there's a good chance that
the project won't succeed.
A team member's departure
midway has a negative effect.

As a result of the need for testers

High risk: On a Waterfall project,
you never really know where you
are because working software
isn't produced until the very end.
It always seems to take 80%
longer to complete the last 20%
of a project.
throughout the project, resource costs
have increased.
Iterations are relentless and require
developers to finish every feature in
full, which can be mentally taxing.

Unsuitable as a model for Assessment of effort is challenging

intricate projects

Slow and expensive because of

the strict controls and rigid
structure

Unsuitable for projects where

there is a moderate to high risk of
requirements changing
Best Practices
Waterfall
The tasks are not too complex.
The goals are precise and short.
Technology is comprehended
There are no ambiguous
requirements
Expert resources are easily
accessible.
Agile
There are many changes frequently.
A regular introduction of new
features is required.
The client expects to see a
functioning product on a regular
basis.
The development team members
are fully committed to the project.
Scrum
Project specifications are
flexible.
There must be a quick feedback
loop.
There are lots of changes
There is a capable,
multidisciplinary team in place.
Short deadlines must be met for
the completion of complex
projects.
Choosing What Fits
The success of your software depends heavily on the methodology you choose in the world of software
development. The waterfall method with sequential steps will be ideal if the project requirements are
clearly defined and there is little chance of changes. However, if your project is large and subject to
frequent changes, the agile method will help you complete it as quickly as possible. And choose the
scrum method if you have a cross-functional team in place with the know-how to finish a dynamic
project in a limited amount of time. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages, so it's important
to carefully weigh your options to determine which one best suits your needs.