CHAPTER 5

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Project Evaluation

User

Table 3
Functional Suitability

Criteria Weighted Mean Verbal Interpretation

Functional Completeness 4.16 Agree
Functional Correctness 4.1 Agree
Functional Appropriateness 4.24 Strongly Agree
Total 4.16 Agree

5 4.16 4.1 4.24

3
1

Figure 6
Functional Suitability

The table 3 and figure 6 above is the functional suitability of the system. It has 3 criteria.

The first criteria is the functional completeness where the system is 100% working, The second

criteria is the functional correctness that refers to the input and output of the system wherein the

users can login and view their predicted course based on the grades input by the school admin.

The third criteria is the functional appropriateness of the system where is the functions have

accomplished the specified task and objectives. The table and figure above is based on the survey

conducted to the users.

 Table 4
Performance Efficiency

Criteria Weighted Mean Verbal Interpretation

Time Behavior 4.28 Strongly Agree
Resource Utilization 4.22 Strongly Agree
Capacity 4.1 Agree
Total 4.2 Strongly Agree

5
4.5 4.28 4.22 4.1
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
Time Behavior Resource Utilization Capacity

Figure 7
Performance Efficiency

The table 4 and figure 7 above is the performance efficiency of the system that has 3

criteria. The first criteria is the time behavior where processing time and response of the system

requirements met. The second criteria is the resource utilization, wherein the amount and types

of resources are used by the system. The third criteria is the capacity of the system where the

maximum limits of the system parameter requirements are met. This feedback is based from the

survey to the users.

 43
Table 5
Usability
Criteria Weighted Mean Verbal Interpretation
Appropriateness Recognisability 4.18 Agree
Learnability 4.4 Strongly Agree
Operability 4.18 Agree
User Error Protection 3.78 Agree
User Interface Aesthetics 4 Agree
Accessibility 4.44 Strongly Agree
Total 4.16 S

5 4.18 4.4 4.18 4.44

3.78 4
4
3
2
1

Figure 8
Usability

The table 5 and figure 8 above is the usability of the system. It has 6 criteria. The first

criteria is the appropriateness recognizability of the system where the users can recognize

whether the system is appropriate for their needs. The second criteria is the learnability where the

quality of the system and the interfaces allow the users

quickly become familiar with them and able to make good use of all the features and capabilities.

The third criteria is the operability where the ability to keep an equipment or a whole industrial

installation in a safe and reliable functioning condition. The fourth criteria is the user error

protection where the system users error can recover quickly. The fifth criteria is the user

44
interface aesthetics where the users attractiveness met. The sixth criteria is the accessibility

where the quality of being able to use by people with the widest range of characteristics and

capabilities of the system requirements are met. This feedback is based from the survey

conducted to the users.

Criteria Weighted Mean Verbal
Table Interpretation 6
Maturity 4.12 Agree
Availability 4.24 Strongly
Agree
Fault Tolerance 3.96 Agree
Recoverability 4.02 Strongly
Agree
Total 4.08

Reliability

4.12 4.24 4.02

3.96

Maturity Availability Fault Tolerance Recoverability

Figure 9
Reliability

The table 6 and figure 9 is the Reliability of the system. It has 4 criteria. The first
45
criteria is tem maturity where the system meets the needs for reliability under normal operation.
The second criteria is the availability where the system is operational and accessible when

required for use. The third criteria is the fault tolerance where the system requirements met

which is the system operates the presence of software faults. The fourth is recoverability where

the system can recover directly and can re-establish the desired state of the system requirements

are met. This feedback is based on the survey conducted to the users.

IT EXPERT

Table 7
Functional Suitability

Criteria Weighted Mean Verbal Interpretation

Functional 4.8 Strongly Agree

Completeness
Functional Correctness 4.2 Strongly Agree
Functional 4.2 Strongly Agree
Appropriateness
Total 4.4

4.8
5 4.2 4.2
4
3
2
1

46

Figure 10
Functional Suitability

The table 7 and figure 10 above is the functional suitability of the system. It has 3

criteria. The first criteria is the functional completeness where the system is 100% working, The

second criteria is the functional correctness that refers to the input and output of the system
wherein the users can login and view their predicted course based on the grades input by the

school admin. The third criteria is the functional appropriateness of the system which is the

functions are accomplished the specified task and objectives. The table and figure above is based

on the survey conducted to the IT Experts.

Table 8
Performance Efficiency

Criteria Weighted Mean Verbal Interpretation

Time Behavior 4.6 Strongly Agree

Resource Utilization 4.4 Strongly Agree
Capacity 4.2 Strongly Agree
Total 4.4

5 4.6
4.5 4.4
4.2
4
3.5
3
47
2.5
2
1.5
1
Time Behavior Resource Utilization Capacity

Figure 11
Performance Efficiency

The table 8 and figure 11 above is the performance efficiency of the system that has 3

criteria. The first criteria is the time behavior where processing time and

response of the system requirements met. The second criteria is the resource utilization, wherein

the amount and types of resources are used by the system. The third criteria is the capacity of the
system where the maximum limits of the system parameter requirements are met. This feedback

is based from the survey to the IT Experts

Table 9
Usability

Criteria Weighted Mean Verbal Interpretation

Appropriateness 4.8 Strongly Agree

Recognisability
Learnability 5 Strongly Agree
Operability 4.4 Strongly Agree
User Error Protection 4.4 Strongly Agree
User Interface 4.2 Strongly Agree
Aesthetics
Accessibility 4.2 Strongly Agree
Total 4.5

4.8 5
4.4 4.4 4.2 4.2
4
2.5
1 48

Figure 12
Usability

The table 9 and figure 12 above is the usability of the system. It has 6 criteria. The first

criteria is the appropriateness recognisability of the system where the users can recognize

whether the system is appropriate for their needs. The second criteria is
the learnability where the quality of the system and the interfaces allow the users quickly become

familiar with them and able to make good use of all the features and capabilities. The third

criteria is the operability where the ability to keep an equipment or a whole industrial installation

in a safe and reliable functioning condition. The

fourth criteria is the user error protection where the system users error can recover quickly. The

fifth criteria is the user interface aesthetics where the users attractiveness met. The sixth criteria

is the accessibility where the quality of being able to use by people with the widest range of

characteristics and capabilities of the system requirements are met. This feedback is based from

the survey conducted to the IT Experts

Table 10
Reliability

Criteria Weighted Mean Verbal Interpretation 49

Maturity 4.2 Strongly Agree

Availability 5 Strongly Agree
Fault Tolerance 3.8 Agree
Recoverability 4.8 Strongly Agree
Total 4.45

5
5 4.8
4.5 4.2
4 3.8
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
Maturity Availability Fault Tolerance Recoverability
 Figure 13
Reliability

The table 10 and figure 13 is the Reliability of the system. It has 4 criteria. The first

criteria is the maturity where the system meets the needs for reliability under normal operation.

The second criteria is the availability where the system is operational and accessible when

required for use. The third criteria is the fault tolerance where the system requirements met

where the system operates the presence of software faults. The fourth is recoverability where the

system can recover directly and can re-establish the desired state of the system requirements.

This feedback is based on the survey conducted to the IT Experts.

50
Table 11
Security
Criteria Weighted Mean Verbal Interpretation

Confidentiality 4.4 Strongly Agree

Integrity 4.4 Strongly Agree
Non-repudiation 3.8 Agree
Accountability 4.6 Strongly Agree
Authenticity 4.2 Strongly Agree
Total 4.28

5 4.4 4.4 4.6

4.2
4 3.8

3
2
1
ty ity on ilit
y
cit
y
tiali egr iati b ti
n In
t d ta en
fide epu oun uth
n r cc A
Co n- A
No

Figure 14
Security
 The table 11 and figure 14 is the security of the system. It has 5 criteria.. The first criteria

is the confidentiality where the requirements needed are met where the system can ensure that

the data are accessible only to those authorized to have access to the system. The second criteria

is the integrity where the system prevents unauthorized access or modification where the action

or events can be proven to have taken place so that the events or actions cannot be repudiated.

The fourth criteria is the accountability where the system actions to an entity can be traced

uniquely to the entity which is met by the system. The fifth criteria is the authenticity where the

system can identify a subject or resource can be proved to be the one claimed, this requirements

met by the system. 51

Table 12
Maintainability
Criteria Weighted Mean Verbal Interpretation

Modularity 4 Agree

Reusability 4 Agree
Analyzability 4.2 Strongly Agree
Modifiability 4.8 Strongly Agree
Testability 4.4 Strongly Agree

Total 4.28

5 4.8
4.5 4.4
4.2
4 4
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
Modularity Reusability Analysability Modifiability Testability
 Figure 15
Maintainability

The table 12 and figure 15 is the Maintainability. It has 5 criteria. The modularity this

criteria explains on how the system can be flexible to use. Analyzability, the ability of the system

in analyzing the data or the info that the user enter inside the system. Reusability, The ability of

the system to be used again repeatedly.

Modifiability, the ability of the system that can modify or limit/restricting of the 52
system.

Testability is the criteria that explains how the system works, being tested/if it is working.

Table 13
Portability

Criteria Weighted Mean Verbal Interpretation

Adaptability 4 Strongly Agree

Instability 4.4 Strongly Agree
Replaceability 4.2 Strongly Agree
Total 4.2

5
4.5 4.4
4.2
4
4
3.5
3
Figure 16 2.5
Portability
2
1.5
The table 13
1
Adaptability Instability Replaceability
and figure 16 above is

the Portability of the system. It has 3 criteria. Adaptability, the system is able to change in order

to fit and to work the system better. It has the ability to adapt. Instability, the system's instability
53
is not stable enough, the consistency has a tendency to change. Replaceability, The system's job

is to place new information is good enough to restore and to replace new and old data.