Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dyadic Theory
Dyadic Theory
Dyadic Theory
Dyadic – Refers to the individualized relationship between a leader and each follower in a work unit
Dyadic theory – Is an approach to leadership that attempts to explain why leaders vary their behavior
with different followers
Dyadic theorists focus on the development and effects of separate dyadic relationships between leaders
and followers
Vertical Dyadic Linkage Theory: Individualized leader–follower interactions creating in-groups and
out-groups
In-group – Includes followers with strong social ties to their leader in a supportive relationship
characterized by high mutual trust, respect, loyalty, and influence
Characteristics of in-group – Participate in important decision making; Are given added responsibility;
Have greater access to the leader; Experience greater support and positive influence from the leader;
Granted special favors from the leader; Mutual reinforcement based on common needs and interests;
More likely to share with own group members than with members of other groups
Out-group – Influences followers with few or no social ties to their leader, in a strictly task-centered
relationship characterized by low exchange and top-down influence
Leader–Member Exchange focuses on the quality of each dyad and its effects on organizational
outcomes over time
High-quality LMX relationships are characterized by: Better social support; More resources; More
guidance for career development; Greater follower input in decision making; Greater negotiating
latitude
Low-quality LMX relationships are characterized by Less support; More formal sueprvision; Little or no
involvement in decision making
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
Team Building
Involves a primary concern to motivate a group of individuals to work together to achieve a common
objective, while alleviating any conflicts or obstacles that may arise while striving toward that objective
The emphasis is on forming relationships with all group members, not just with a few special individuals
Each person must perceive that he or she is an important and respected member of the team rather
than a non-entity
Workplace social exchanges between individual employees, work groups, and managers are critical to
team building
There is a noticeable trend of organizations seeking and getting involved in a variety of collaborative
agreements for the purposes of entering new markets and gaining innovations or new products
By collaborating, organizations hope to exchange strengths with others, which will allow all partners to
develop timely, innovative, synergistic solutions to complex problems they could not address on their
own
From a network perspective, the focus is on relations among actors, whether they are individuals, work
units, or organizations, who are embedded within networks of interconnected relationships that provide
opportunities and constraints on behavior
A systems-oriented prospective focuses on how the quality of the LMX relationship affects followers at
the interpersonal, group, and organizational levels
Proponents of the systems and networks view contend that leader relationships are not limited to
followers, but include peers, customers, suppliers, and other relevant stakeholders in the collectives of
workgroups and organization-wide networks
To be effective, groups need to manage ―”boundary spanning” relationships with other groups and
external members in their organization in order to gain access to information and resources
Pre-feedback—Leader should:
Remind self to stay calm and professional
Gather accurate facts on follower performance
Remind self to avoid rush to judgment
Delegation
It is the process of assigning the responsibility and authority for accomplishing objectives; Refers to
giving employees new tasks; Success depends on a manager’s ability to know what to delegate and what
not to delegate;
Benefits of Delegation
Gives managers more time to perform high-priority tasks; Gets tasks accomplished and increases
productivity; Enables leaders to mobilize resources and secure better results than they could have got
alone; Trains employees and improves their self-esteem; Eases the stress and burden on managers;
Enriches followers’ jobs
What to delegate: Paperwork Routine tasks Technical matters Tasks with developmental
potential Solving employees’ problems
What not to delegate: Personnel matters Confidential activities Activities delegated to you
personally Crises
CHAPTER 8 | TEAM LEADERSHIP AND SELF_MANAGED TEAMS
Group:
Team:
Advantages – synergy; avoidance of major errors; faster, better decisions; continuous improvement;
innovation; self-motivation; empowerment; greater job satisfaction; needs fulfillment.
Disadvantages – Pressure to conform to group standards of performance and conduct; Resistance to the
team effort from impinging on autonomy; Social loafing; Groupthink; Intergroup conflicts; High levels of
pressure and stress .
Individual-level performance appraisal helps reduce social loafing, but risks jeopardizing team
interaction and synergy.
> Groupthink
Is when members of a cohesive group tend to agree on a decision not on the basis of its merit but
because they are less willing to risk rejection for questioning a majority viewpoint or presenting a
dissenting opinion;
Self-Belief: Is knowing who you are; Charismatic leaders overcome inner conflict in order to reach their
full potential
Legacy: Charismatic leaders are driven to leave their personal mark on society
Activist Mind-Set: Charismatic leaders use political and social causes as opportunities to influence
change and provide a better life for their followers
Faith and Spirituality: Charismatic leaders often face hardships while leading missions of change and rely
on faith for support
Charismatic leaders are very much opposed to the status quo and strive to change it;
Non-charismatic leaders essentially agree with the status quo and strive to maintain it
Admirers of charismatic leaders believe that such individuals possess heroic qualities that enable them
to persist in spite of the odds against them
Follower perceptions of these heroic qualities evoke sentiments of adoration, especially when the
leader’s activities exemplify acts of heroism involving personal risk and self-sacrificing behavior
Charismatic leaders have the ability to articulate an ideological and inspirational vision—a transcendent
vision that promises a better future than the present
Effective articulation of vision is measured in what is said (content and context) and how it is said
(oratorical abilities)
Effective communication skills are an imperative in the successful articulation of a compelling vision
They are sensitive to both the capabilities and emotional needs of followers
They are aware of the need to align organizational strategies with existing capabilities to ensure a
successful transformation
Transformational leadership - Serves to change the status quo by articulating to followers the
problems in the current system and a compelling vision of what a new organization could be
Transactional leadership – Seeks to maintain stability within an organization through regular economic
and social exchanges that achieve specific goals for both the leaders and their followers
Charismatic leaders by nature are transformational, but not all transformational leaders achieve their
transforming results through the charismatic effects of their personalities
Transformational leaders are similar to charismatic leaders in that they can articulate a compelling
vision of the future and influence followers by arousing strong emotions in support of the vision
Transformational leaders can emerge from different levels of the organization
An organization may have many transformational leaders; in contrast, charismatic leaders are few in
number
Charismatic leaders are most likely to emerge in the throes of a crisis
The response by people to a charismatic or transformational leader is often highly polarized, but the
emotional levels of resistance toward charismatic leaders are more extreme than those toward
transformational leaders
Both charismatic and transformational leadership always involve conflict and change
Transformational leadership
Inspires followers to go beyond self-interest and act for the good of the organization
Leaders are described as influential, inspirational, and charismatic
Serves to change the status quo by articulating to followers the problems in the current system and a
compelling vision of what a new organization could be
Creates significant change in both followers and organizations
Creates and shares knowledge at the individual and group levels
Emphasize the importance of group values and focus on collective interests
Transactional leadership
Caters to the self-interest of followers by rewarding specific behaviors and performance that meets
with the leader’s expectations and punishes behavior and performance that does not meet expectations
Leaders are described as task- and reward-oriented, structure, and passive
Involves specific contractual arrangements with followers that provides them with benefits that satisfy
their needs and desires in exchange for meeting specified objectives or performing certain duties
Promotes stability
Exploits knowledge at the organizational level
Focuses on defining roles and task requirements and giving rewards that are contingent on task
fulfillment
CHAPTER 10 | LEADERSHIP OF CULTURE, ETHICS, AND DIVERSITY
Cooperative culture
Represents a leadership belief in strong, mutually reinforcing exchanges and linkages between
employees and departments
Operating policies, procedures, standards, and tasks are all designed to encourage cooperation,
teamwork, power sharing, and camaraderie among employees
Management thinking is predicated on the belief that organizational success is influenced more by
employee relationships inside the organization than by external relationships
Employees are trained to think like owners rather than hired hands
Adaptive culture
Represents a leadership belief in active monitoring of the external environment for emerging
opportunities and threats
Made up of policies, procedures, and practices that support employees’ ability to respond quickly to
changing environmental conditions
Members are encouraged to take risks, experiment, and innovate
Management thinking is based on the belief that organizational success is influenced more by events
outside the organization than by internal factors
Employees are empowered to make decisions and act quickly to take advantage of emerging
opportunities or avoid threats
Competitive culture
Represents a leadership that encourages and values a highly competitive work environment
Organizational policies, procedures, work practices, rules, and tasks are all designed to foster both
internal competition and external competition
Leaders focus on the achievement of specific targets such as market share, revenue, growth, or
profitability
Values competitiveness, personal initiative, aggressiveness, achievement, and the willingness to work
long and hard for yourself or for the team
Bureaucratic culture
Represents a leadership that values order, stability, status, and efficiency
Leaders perceive their environments as basically stable with an internal strategic focus
Emphasizes strict adherence to set rules, policies, and procedures
Are highly structured and efficiency driven
For organizations to embrace and value diversity, the concept itself must be embedded in the
organization’s business model
When diversity leadership becomes part of the organization’s mission, all employees are given equal
opportunities to contribute their talents, skills, and expertise toward achieving organizational objectives
Leaders have a responsibility to create a work culture that accommodates the needs of a diverse
workforce
CHAPTER 11 | STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT
It is a process of providing the direction and inspiration necessary to create and implement a firm’s
vision, mission, and strategies to achieve organizational objectives.
> Strategic Management is the set of decisions and actions used to formulate and implement specific
strategies that will achieve a competitively superior fit between the organization and its environment, so
as to achieve organizational goals