Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PCB Quality Metrics That Drive Reliability (PD 18) : Disclaimer
PCB Quality Metrics That Drive Reliability (PD 18) : Disclaimer
bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 February 3rd, 2020 IPC APEX EXPO 2020 2 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
PDC Outline 1.
2.
1-10C Test Coupon and Artwork Generation Task Group
3-11 Laminate Prepreg Materials Subcommittee
About Me 3.
4.
5.
3-11G Corrosion of Metal Finishes Task Group
3-12D Woven Glass Reinforcement Task Group
3-12E Base Materials Roundtable Task Group
Section 0: Intro
6. 4-14 Plating Processes Subcommittee
Components. 14.
15.
16.
5-22AS J-STD-001 Space Electronic Assemblies Task Group
5-24B Solder Paste Task Group
5-32A Ion Chromatography Ionic Conductivity Task Group
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 3 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 4 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Explore some of the
solar system's oldest
bodies, a series of
asteroids known as the
"Trojans
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 5 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 6 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Geotail
TRMM
TOMS
Reliability is the ability of a product to properly function, within specified performance
limits, for a specified period of time, under the life cycle application conditions
SOHO Aqua ICESat-2
THEMIS
TIMED Landsat 7 TOPEX
TRACE
CALIPSO
Terra
ACE GRACE
Cluster
SORCE
POES
– Within specified performance limits: A product must function within certain tolerances in order to be
reliable.
SDO
IMAGE AIM
Aura
FAST GOES
Polar GPM
Solar-B
MMS
– For a specified period of time: A product has a useful life during which it is expected to function within
IBEX NPP
TDRSS LDCM
CloudSat
Aquarius
specifications.
Osiris-Rex
(Sample Return)
RBSP
WMAP
TWINS
Cassini
– Under the life cycle application conditions: Reliability is dependent on the product’s life cycle
(Instrument)
NuSTAR JWST
Astro-H RXTE
Galileo IUE
Juno MAVEN
Integral
Pioneer EUVE
FUSE COBE
Mars Science Swift
Laboratory
Fermi
Compton
GRO
LADEE
LRO
Hyper-exponential
V50
Reliability statisticians are interested in tracking E <1 E>1
infant mortality strength strength
system level failure data during the service life for wearout stress stress
exponential pdf V0.1
logistical purposes, and in determining how the E =1 pdf
hazard rate curve looks. “random” failures
time
failures change in failures change in
• PoF reliability engineers are interested in ‘Defective’ Nominal mean variance
f(t)
understanding and controlling the individual failures population population Changes in durability Changes in quality
that cause the curve. &
random Wearout failures: (damage-endurance interference)
• PoF engineers do so through systematic and detailed Cumulative Distribution Function
overstress Cumulative increase
assessment of
1
life
events damage endurance 0.8
margin
• influence of hardware configuration and life-cycle 0.6
t50
F(t)
stresses… pdf 0.4
t0.1
• on root-cause failure mechanisms… 0.2 desired life
• in the materials at potential failure sites. 0
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 11 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 12 February 3rd,1
2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
2
Failure Definitions
When a Product Fails, There Are Costs . . .
• To the Manufacturer Failure A product no longer performs the function for which it was intended
• To the Customer Failure Model Quantitative relationship between lifetime or probability of failure and
o Personal injury loads
o Loss of mission, service or capacity Load Application/environmental condition needed (electrical, thermal,
o Cost of repair or replacement mechanical, chemical...) to precipitate a failure mechanism.
o Indirect costs, such as increase in insurance, damage to reputation, loss of market
share
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 13 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 14 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Corrosion,
Dendrite growth,
Chemical
Chemical Contamination Depolymerization,
Intermetallic Growth
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 15 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 16 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Cost of a Single Unplanned Data Center Outage Iceberg Model of Cost of Poor Quality
Across 16 Industries
The average cost of data center downtime across industries was approximately $5,600 per minute.
Ref: Ponemon Inst., 䇾Calculating the Cost of Data Center Outages,䇿 Feb. 1, 2011. Ref: A. Buthmann, “Cost of Quality: Not Only Failure Costs,” iSixSigma.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 17 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 18 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 19 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 20 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Polyimide PCBA Supply Chain* Major Constituents of Laminates*
Glass Raw Materials
(Silica, Limestone, Clay, Boric Acid) Constituent Major function (s) Example material (s)
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 21 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 22 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Example: The Glass Treatment Story * Printed Circuit Boards Continue to Cause
Glass Weave Style Glass Weave Style Glass Weave Style
Headaches
• PCB vendors continue to provide high performance materials
which are represented to be resistant to conductive anodic
filament (CAF), fiber pullout and laminate cracking.
• Yet, PCB quality and reliability continues to suffer due to
1080 Style 2116 Style 7628 Style failures attributed to poor glass/resin adhesion leading to CAF.
Fiber/resin interphase • High rates of non-conformances carrying high risk lead to Halogen-free PCB Reliability Test and
Failure Analysis, IST Group
delamination occurs due multiple rebuilds causing impactful schedule delays.
poor glass treatment.
Hu, Chaohui. "Study on the factors which affecting the conductive anodic filament reliability Sood, Bhanu, and Pecht, Michael. "The effect of
for packing substrate." Electronic Packaging Technology (ICEPT), 2017 18th International epoxy/glass interfaces on CAF failures in printed
* - Sood, Bhanu, and Michael Pecht. "The effect of epoxy/glass interfaces on CAF failures in printed circuit boards." Microelectronics Reliability (2017). Conference on. IEEE, 2017. circuit boards." Microelectronics Reliability 82
(2018): 235-243.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 23 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 24 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Formation of Conductive Filaments [1] [2] Glass Fibers and Sizing Agents
Oxidation Sites
+ í • Coupling agents are part of the sizings, they are functionally graded materials that act as
adhesion promoters. [1] [2] [3]
Epoxy Resin – Sizing agents are typically composed of antistats, lubricant, surfactant, silanes and film formers.
PTH PTH
– Silane act as molecular bridges between two chemically different materials (glass and epoxy matrix).
Glass Fiber
Low pH
– Organo-functional group bonds to the organic resin and inorganic groups bond to the glass surface.
Cu Cu2+
• Sizing formulation chemistries and their proportions are closely held by glass suppliers and
Cu Cu
salt salt salt
Cu2+ Cu Cu
2+ Delamination
Low pH
Cu
PCB suppliers
Cu
salt salt salt
Cu2+
Epoxy Resin “…we are not allowed to discuss any sizing or glass chemistry related topics outside by company policy.
Low pH
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 29 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 30 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Glass Fiber
Glass Fiber
Si
O
Glass Surface
O Si (CH2)3 NH2
Glass Surface
O OH + HO Si (CH2)3 NH2
Time
O Si O Si H2 O
O O OH HO
O
O Si O Si
O Si2O + H2O ĺ 2SiOH
O Debonded epoxy
O Si O Si Bulk
Epoxy H2O
Covalently H2O
H2O
Chemically Bonded Silane Epoxy bonded siloxane H2O
Chemically Bonded Hydrolyzed
and glass
Silane Glass Fiber
Polymer
1. Sood, B., & Pecht, M. (2017). The effect of epoxy/glass interphases on CAF failures in printed circuit boards. Microelectronics Reliability.
2.Tomlin, Andrew Dermot. "Self-sensing composites: cure monitoring." (2010). As the PCBs absorb moisture and combined with the residual stresses at the glass-resin interphase, the hydrolysis
3.Halvorson, Rolf H., Robert L. Erickson, and Carel L. Davidson. "The effect of filler and silane content on conversion of resin-based composite." Dental reaction at the interphase between the glass and resin drives an “unzipping” of the bonded region.
Materials 19.4 (2003): 327-333.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 31 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 32 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Results of the Hydrolysis
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 33 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 34 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
* - “Challenges and Opportunities: State of the U.S. Bare Printed Circuit Board Industry” Crawford M. and Botwin B., IPC APEX Expo, February 11-16, 2017, San * - “Challenges and Opportunities: State of the U.S. Bare Printed Circuit Board Industry” Crawford M. and Botwin B., IPC APEX Expo, February 11-16, 2017, San
Diego CA. Reproduced with permission. Diego CA. Reproduced with permission.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 35 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 36 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Bare PCB Supplier Capabilities* Material Supply Chain Disruptions*
* - “Challenges and Opportunities: State of the U.S. Bare Printed Circuit Board Industry” Crawford M. and Botwin B., IPC APEX Expo, February 11-16, 2017, San * - “Challenges and Opportunities: State of the U.S. Bare Printed Circuit Board Industry” Crawford M. and Botwin B., IPC APEX Expo, February 11-16, 2017, San
Diego CA. Reproduced with permission. Diego CA. Reproduced with permission.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 37 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 38 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 39 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 40 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Significance of Printed Circuit Board Requirements
• The requirements and coupons are a “front door”.
• Examples:
– Internal Annular Ring:
• Egregious violations indicate there may have been a serious problem in development
of the board (layup or lamination).
• Other NCs don’t indicate any risk at all (example: application of IPC-6012 Rev B.
v/s IPC-6012 Rev. D) PCB Supplier Evaluation Study
– Negative etchback v/s positive etchback:
• Modern cleaning processes and flight experience result in equal reliability with both
etchback conditions or no etchback.
– Wicking of copper:
• Requirements are conservative based on broad statistics.
• A basic analysis of the board layout can indicate directly if there is risk or not,
regardless of requirements violations.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 41 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 42 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 43 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 44 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Requirements, Nonconformance, Data Study Methodology
Generation and Collection
• Present study evaluates only the microsections performed by GSFC. • Since 2015, received and analyzed 882 PCB coupon submissions from PCB suppliers.
– PCB coupon microsection evaluation in accordance to IPC Standard (IPC-6018B • Top ten suppliers sent 638 submissions.
Class 3, IPC-6012C Class 3/A). • Total nonconformance observed: 260
– Coupon evaluation reports were generated, identified non-conformances.
• All PCB coupon testing results from all GSFC suppliers were recorded for 3 years
(from 2015 – 2017): • For each supplier, analyzed nonconformance (s)
– Data include nonconformance and conformances in accordance with IPC – Identify severity trend across top 10 GSFC suppliers by analyzing submission rate
Standards. and nonconformance spread.
– Total number of data points are approximately 882 jobs. – Classifying and analyzing top 5 severity categories.
– Each job has number of nonconformance with different severity.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 45 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 46 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 47 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 48 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Analyzing Top 5 Severities of Supplier’s
Nonconformance Inner Layer Separations or Inclusions
• Observations show the
(A) Inner layer separations/inclusions • Separation of inner-layer foil and the
nonconformances with the most
(D) Separation/inclusions between plating layers plated through hole barrel.
(E) Copper wicking in excess of 2.0 mil
occurrences (7 out of 10 Suppliers) are
(F) Internal annular ring less than 2.0 mil
• Inclusion - contaminant material that
D and F. is present in an area where it is not
(J) ENIG is less than the minimum requirements
• Investigated the contributors to expected.
implement techniques which may
eliminate theses nonconformances from
Risk: intermittent electrical open or
at least 7 suppliers.
complete open after board is
subjected to thermal excursions
(reflow, wave soldering or rework)
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 49 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 50 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 51 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 52 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Separation or Inclusions Between Plating Layers
Copper Wicking in Excess of 2.0 mil
1. Sood, Bhanu, and Michael Pecht. "Printed Circuit Board Laminates." Wiley Encyclopedia of Composites (2011).
2. Tummala, Rao R., Eugene J. Rymaszewski, and Y. C. Lee. "Microelectronics packaging handbook." (1989): 241-242.
3. IPC-6012 – Qualification and Performance Specification for Rigid Printed Boards.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 53 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 54 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Copper Wicking in Excess of 2.0 mil Internal Annular Ring Less Than 2.0 mil
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 55 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 56 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Internal Annular Ring Less Than 2.0 mil ENIG (Au or Ni) Less than the Minimum
Electroless nickel and/or immersion
Contributors Resolution gold plating thickness (ENIG) is less XRFSpectrum
• Drilled-hole pattern not • Better material selection of than the minimum requirements (118
matching the lands on the laminate, improved
internal layers (Misregistration). cleanliness, and reduction in
micro-inches for Ni and 2 micro-inches
• Lamination process. the amount of volatiles. for Au).
• Prelamination treatments that Risk: (1) solderability and, (2)
• Confirm whether or not it is excessive dissolution of copper into
involve scrubbing or bending operator error.
may stretch the thin laminate, the bulk solder (forming brittle
which will then shrink after it is • Update drawing notes to intermetallic) when nickel is thin.
etched and baked dry. bring the notes in line with
• Application of specification or current industry maturity
drawing notes. levels. 1. Johal, Kuldip, and Jerry Brewer. "Are you in control of your electroless nickel/immersion gold process?." Proc. Of IPC Works. No. S03-3. 2000.
2. Meng, Chong Kam, Tamil Selvy Selvamuniandy, and Charan Gurumurthy. "Discoloration related failure mechanism and its root cause in Electroless
Nickel Immersion Gold (ENIG) Pad metallurgical surface finish." Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits, 2004. IPFA 2004. Proceedings of
the 11th International Symposium on the. IEEE, 2004.
3. IPC-4552 – Specification for Electroless Nickel/Immersion Gold (ENIG) Plating for Printed Circuit Boards
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 57 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 58 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 59 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 60 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
What Causes Products to Fail?
Generally, failures do not “just happen.”
Failures may arise during any of the following
stages of a product’s life cycle:
Failure Analysis
Root Cause analysis has four major objectives: The root cause is the most basic causal factor or factors that, if corrected
or removed, will prevent the recurrence of the situation.*
• Verify that a failure occurred;
• Determine the symptom or the apparent way a part has failed The purpose of determining the root cause(s) is to fix the problem at its most
(the mode); basic source so it doesn’t occur again, even in other products, as opposed to
• Determine the mechanism and root cause of the failure; merely fixing a failure symptom. Identifying root causes is the key to
• Recommend corrective and preventative action. preventing similar occurrences in the future.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 65 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 66 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
• Only when one is able to determine WHY an event or failure occurred, will one be able to
Analyze and Interpret Evidence
determine corrective measures, and over time, the root causes identified can be used to Review documents and
procedures, and check
Conduct physical
evaluation
Validate
hypotheses
target major opportunities for improvement. against standards (core of the FA process)
• Uncovering ROOT CAUSE may require 7 iterations of “Why?” Identify Restart Criteria
Conduct a Follow-up Audit,
Implement Corrective
Actions and/or Document Confirm Effectiveness, then
Develop Corrective Actions
Resolutions Critique and Modify Process
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 67 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 68 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Hypothesizing Causes
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 69 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 70 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 71 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 72 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Cause and Effect Diagram (Electrical Opens in PCBs) Cause and Effect Diagram (Electrical Shorts in PCBs) Design
Design
Heat Resistance
Heat Resistance Materials
Materials
Dissipation
Dissipation
Power
Materials
Materials Equipment Quality Properties
Power
Equipm ent Q uality Properties
Dielectric
Dielectric Tolerances
Tolerances
Com patibility Set points Compatibility
Set points Constant Dimensions
Constant Dim ensions Thickness Material
Thickness Material
Traces Therm al & Electrical Traces Thermal & Electrical
Calibration Operational Q uality Calibration Operational Quality
Stability Stability
Procedure Current Min Spacing Procedure Current Min Spacing
Dim ensions Dimensions
Max Selection Max Selection
tim e Im pedance Cost time Impedance Cost
Preventive Characteristic Preventive Characteristic
Capability
Maintenance Changes Requirem ents Capability
Operational Peak Resistance to Environm ental Maintenance Changes Requirements
Conditions Continuous
Process
Conditions Operational Peak Resistance to Environmental
Process
Assem bly Conditions Continuous Conditions
Precision Balanced? Environm ent Assembly
O bsolescence Specifications Precision Method Environment
Layer Thickness Material Micro Vias Obsolescence
Material Layer Specifications
Build up W arpage Plating Thickness
Method Material Stacking
O pen Warpage Sequence
Micro via
Router
W orking Instructions (Depaneling)
Fabrication
Response Flow
Short
Method Solder Pre-preg thickness
Pressing W arpage W orking Checklist (RFC) Mask
O JT Working Instructions Response Flow
Metallization Instructions Method
Pressing Warpage Working Checklist (RFC)
O ver stress Application OJT
Material W arpage Metallization Instructions
Handling SO P Notes
Ability Handling Over stress Application
Tolerances Material Warpage
Handling SOP Notes
Stack up Standards Ability Handling
Knowledge Deburr
Certification Drilling Tolerances
Registration Manual or
Cleaning Autom atic Stack up Standards
Knowledge Deburr
Capability Certification Drilling
Docum ented Registration Manual or
Training Process Cleaning Automatic
Quality Tolerance
Method Capability
Man Photolithography Documented
Artwork
Inspection Training Process
Inner layer Quality Tolerance
Cycles etching Method
Reflow Man Photolithography
Artwork
tim e Inspection
Soldering Inner layer
Peak Peak Rework
etching
W ave Tem p Assem bly Tem p Assembly
Solder Process Process
Ref: Coombs C. F. "Printed circuits handbook." Printed Circuits Handbook. McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing (2007). Ref: Sood B., and Pecht M., 2011. Printed Circuit Board Laminates. Wiley Encyclopedia of Composites. 1–11.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 73 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 74 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
% of failed devices
90
Stacking up
time Method Accelerator 20 80
Binder
Warpage
Pre-preg 70
Cumulative
Blank
Bow & Twist Humidity
15 60
Metallization Copper Sheet
Booking time Reinforce
method 50
Material Dimensions
alloy Solder
temperature 10 40
Reflow mask Properties
profile Wave 30
No. of passes CTE
Solder Quality
Cooling Rate
Profile 5 20
Delamination
Warpage 10
Working Instructions
Specs
Pre-preg 0 0
OJT
Pr d F tac t ape
nd
st d
ed
n
Fa nres D
M ble de D al
d
ot ond
al- ly
am ide
al n
La en
Po mb fec t
Fi ion hip
p
t E ct
e
or min t
ied
As g D d
rn ic on ther
s
tr Stit ers
he
e
-M ion/ rfac
at olve
io
l
ur
M atio
e- r Fa h-u
ig bilit
et
M mb
U ES
at ngo
e
Life
al Con efe
lat
m
p
Ch Bo
at
c
us f C
rif
l T Def
th
ec ailur Fail
M
B
sc
O
isp atc
e
Ex lys ly-O
Co /Sili
xi ram
ac -Re
Stack up
in
tc
a
al, sse
O
u
Ve
&
o
il
c p M ess- c h
Cycle
o
Po lliza ip s
M Sc r
Ba
N
et
In
A
ss
g
b
et
n
ta
es
in
Ability Handling Sequence
ro
e,
nt
xi
tr e
de
N
ks
n
es
O
se
il
Co
t
t,
il
Bo Co
rs
iff
D sion hea ail a
na
e
t
am Waf
O
ve
al
et
D
Cr
e
Sh
Operating Assembly
nd
tiv
F
O
si
a
rS
te
n
-
et
nd
Bo
al
Vi
ed
ly
ag
Conditions Process
et
Knowledge
ric
Bo
ot
Ch ess
ll
Certification
Ba
t
ec
i
ll
il,
D
c
ec -Ch
Ba
ro
El
Fa
d
ip
ol
isp
d
G
ol
Copper
tr i
M
G
Epoxy/Resin
Failure Causes
o
rr
Thickness
iel
Co
System
Training
No. of layers
Man
Design
Ref: Sood B., and Pecht M., 2011. Printed Circuit Board Laminates. Wiley Encyclopedia of Composites. 1–11. Ref: Pecht M. and V. Ramappan: “Review of Electronic System and Device Field Failure Returns,” IEEE Transactions on CHMT, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 1160-1164, 1992.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 75 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 76 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Collecting Supporting Evidence Analysis and Interpretation of Evidence
• Reviewing in-house procedures
– (e.g., design, manufacturing process, procurement, storage, handling, quality control, maintenance,
• Even if a root cause has been hypothesized, additional environmental policy, safety, communication or training procedures)
evidence is often required to assess (i.e., prove or invalidate) • …against corresponding standards, regulations, or part- and equipment vendor documentation
the hypotheses formulated. – (e.g., part data sheet and application notes, equipment operating and maintenance manuals)
• ….can help identify causes such as misapplication of equipment, and weakness in a design, process or
• Evidence can be gathered by procedure.
– undertaking sample physical evaluation. – Example 1: misapplication of a component could arise from its use outside the vendor specified
– reviewing documents and procedures against standards, and operating conditions (e.g., current, voltage, or temperature).
– Example 2: equipment (e.g., assembly, rework or inspection equipment) misapplication can result from
– interviews uncontrolled modifications or changes in the operating requirements of the machine.
– Example 3: a defect may have been introduced due to misinterpretation of poorly written assembly
instructions.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 77 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 78 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
• The overriding principle of failure analysis is to start with the least destructive Preservation of Failure
Investigation of Failure
methods and progress to increasingly more destructive techniques. Occurrence Circumstances
Non-Destructive Analysis
• The potential for a nominally non-destructive technique to cause irreversible changes of Failure
Verification of Failure/
– For example, the simple act of handling a sample, or measuring a resistance, can cause permanent Classification of Failure Mode
Reliability Test/
changes that could complicate analysis further down the line. Simulation of
Failure Circumstances
• Each sample and failure incidence may require a unique sequence of steps for failure Deprocessing (Destructive In-Circuit Evaluation
analysis. The process demands an open mind, attention to detail, and a methodical Physical Analysis
Physical Analysis
Hypothesis of
Failure Mechanism
Verification &
Root Cause Determination Corrective Action
Documentation
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 79 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 80 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) External Inspection
• Visual Inspection • Visual inspection of external condition
• Optical Microscopy – Differences from good samples
• X-ray imaging – May require exemplars
• X-ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy • Detailed inspection: appearance, composition, damage,
contamination, migration, abnormalities
• Acoustic microscopy – Low power microscope
• Residual gas analysis – High power microscope
• Hermeticity Testing – Scanning electron microscope (SEM)
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 81 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 82 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Deprocessing:
Electrical Testing
Destructive Physical Analysis (DPA)
• Electrical characteristics/performance • Modification of specimen in order to reveal
• DC test internal structures and analyze failure site. May
• Parametrics (current-voltage characteristic) involve:
• Simulated usage conditions – Cross-sectioning and metallography
– Decapsulation or delidding
• Electrical probing
– Residual Gas Analysis for internal gases
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 83 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 84 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Fault Isolation Physical Analysis of Failure Site
• Electrical Probing Visual and
Electrical Scanning Decapsulation Destructive
light Mechanical
testing of acoustic then optical cross-
• Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) microscope
examination
component microscope microscope section,
testing of
internal
and and X-ray E-SEM, VC, E-SEM, and
• Electron Beam Testing of part
connector radiograph and EBIC EDS
components
deformation
• Emission Microscopy Package cracking
Corrosion
SDDV and
Solder joint
cracking and Bond shear
coarsening
• Scanning Probe Microscopy Package cracks Parametric shifts electromigration
Die cracking
or bond lift
• Thermal Analysis Damaged
solder joints
Contact resistance
Wire sweep
broken wire EOS/ESD
Part
delamination Die shear
and cracking
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 85 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 86 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 87 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 88 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Review: Failure Definitions Review: Classification of Failures
Failure A product no longer performs the function for Key classes of failure:
which it was intended – overstress: use conditions exceed strength of materials; often
Failure Mode The effect by which a failure is observed. sudden and catastrophic
Failure Site The location of the failure. – wearout: accumulation of damage with extended usage or
Failure Mechanism The physical, chemical, thermodynamic or repeated stress
other process that results in failure.
– infant mortality: failures early in expected life; typically
related to quality issues.
In principle, it should be possible to develop a failure model
for a specific failure mechanism, expressing the likelihood of
failure (time-to-failure, probability of failure, strength, etc.) as
a function of the stresses and characteristics of the material.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 89 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 90 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Lee, T. W., ‘ESD and EOS- There Is a Difference’, Commercialization of Military and Space Electronics Conference, pp. 49-65, 2002.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 91 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 92 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Board Level Failures (examples) Assembly Level Failures (examples)
Plated Through Hole (PTH)/Via Board Solder Interconnect
1. Fatigue cracks in PTH/Via wall 8. CAF (hollow fiber) • Poor Solderability/Wettability
2. Overstress cracks in PTH/Via wall 9. CAF (fiber/resin interface) – Tombstoning; Can accelerate other solder failure mechanisms
3. Land corner cracks 10. Electrochemical migration
• Overstress Interconnect Failures
4. Openings in PTH/Via wall 11. Buckling (warp and twist)
– Solder Fracture (accelerated by intermetallic formation)
5. PTH/Via wall-pad separation
Copper Metallization • Wearout Interconnect Failures
Electrical 12. Cracks in internal trace – Solder Fatigue, Solder Creep
6. Electrical overstress (EOS) 13. Cracks in surface trace • Solder Bridging
7. Signal interruption (EMI) 14. Corrosion of surface trace • Component Failure due to Handling
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 93 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 94 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
ECM: Surface and Sub-surface Mechanisms Formation of Conductive Filaments [1] [2]
Positive Negative Positive Positive Oxidation Sites
Anode Cathode Anode Anode
+ í
Epoxy Resin
PTH PTH
Glass Fiber
Cu Cu Cu2+ Cu
Cu2+ Cu2+ Delamination
Cu Cu Cu Cu2+
Negative
150 μm 300 μm Epoxy Resin
Cathode
Contributors 2um
• Fiber/resin
Path formation step (t1) for CAF
separation is eliminated when hollow glass
• Thermal excursions fibers are present.
• Hollow fibers
Fiber/resin interphase delamination occurs due to CTE mismatch (shear) induced
• Wicking
weakening or bond degradation.
• Drilling damage
[1] IPC-9691, User guide for the IPC-TM-650, method 2.6.25, conductive anodic filament (CAF) resistance and other internal electrochemical migration testing.
[1] Sood, B., & Pecht, M. (2011). Conductive filament formation in printed circuit boards: effects of reflow conditions and flame
[2] Shukla, A. (1997). Hollow fibers in woven laminates. Print Circ Fab, 20(1), 30-32.
retardants. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 22(10), 1602-1615.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 97 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 98 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Ref: Rogers, Keith, et al. "Conductive filament formation failure in a printed circuit board." Circuit World 25.3 (1999): 6-8.
Ref: Rogers, Keith, et al. "Conductive filament formation failure in a printed circuit board." Circuit World 25.3 (1999): 6-8.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 99 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 100 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Factors Affecting CAF:
Board Orientation Respective to Fabric Weave Effect of Voltage and Humidity on
The initial set of parallel Time to Failure
fiber bundles, known as the
warp, lie in the machine
direction
90 degrees
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 101 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 102 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Fiber/resin interface
delamination occurs
as a result of stresses
generated under
thermal cycling due
to a large CTE
mismatch between
the glass fiber and
Hollow fibers are vacuous glass filaments in E-glass laminates that can provide
the epoxy resin Delamination
paths for CAF.
(ratio of 1 to 12).
Delamination can be prevented/resisted by selecting resin With the appearance of hollow fibers inside the laminates, CAF can happen as a
one step process. In this case, the number of hollow fibers inside the laminates
with lower CTE’s and optimizing the glass surface finish.
is most critical to reliability.
Studies have shown that the bond between fiber and resin is
strongly dependent upon the fiber finish.
Ref: Rogers, Keith Leslie. "An analytical and experimental investigation of filament formation in glass/epoxy composites." (2005). Ref: Rogers, Keith Leslie. "An analytical and experimental investigation of filament formation in glass/epoxy composites." (2005).
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 103 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 104 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Images of Hollow Fibers Drilling
Drilling Damage
Ref: Rogers, Keith Leslie. "An analytical and experimental investigation of filament formation in glass/epoxy composites." (2005). Ref: Rogers, Keith Leslie. "An analytical and experimental investigation of filament formation in glass/epoxy composites." (2005).
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 105 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 106 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Ion transport
Anode (Cu) Cathode (Cu)
Adsorbed Moisture
Substrate
Ref: He, Xiaofei, M. Azarian, and M. Pecht. "Effects of solder mask on electrochemical migration of tin-lead and lead-free boards." IPC printed circuit Expo, APEX & Designer summit Ref: He, Xiaofei, M. Azarian, and M. Pecht. "Effects of solder mask on electrochemical migration of tin-lead and lead-free boards." IPC printed circuit Expo, APEX & Designer summit
proceedings and Ambat, Rajan, et al. "Solder flux residues and electrochemical migration failures of electronic devices." Eurocorr proceedings, Nice 10.1.3321953 (2009). proceedings and Ambat, Rajan, et al. "Solder flux residues and electrochemical migration failures of electronic devices." Eurocorr proceedings, Nice 10.1.3321953 (2009).
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 109 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 110 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Ref: He, Xiaofei, M. Azarian, and M. Pecht. "Effects of solder mask on electrochemical migration of tin-lead and lead-free boards." IPC printed circuit Expo, APEX & Designer summit
proceedings and Ambat, Rajan, et al. "Solder flux residues and electrochemical migration failures of electronic devices." Eurocorr proceedings, Nice 10.1.3321953 (2009).
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 111 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 112 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
PTH Failures (cont.)
1. Circumferential Cracking –
Single Event Overstress
Pad
corner crack Etch pit Wall-Pad
PTH
separation
Circumferential crack Board Since the difference in the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of the copper
Pad plating and the resin system in the PWBs is at least a factor of 13, stress exerted
delamination
on the plated copper in the plated-through holes in the z-axis can cause
cracking.
Ref: Bhandarkar, S. M., et al. "Influence of selected design variables on thermo-mechanical stress distributions in plated-through-hole structures." Journal of Ref: Bhandarkar, S. M., et al. "Influence of selected design variables on thermo-mechanical stress distributions in plated-through-hole structures." Journal of
Electronic Packaging 114.1 (1992): 8-13. Electronic Packaging 114.1 (1992): 8-13.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 113 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 114 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 115 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 116 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Root-Cause Analysis of Circumferential
2. Openings in PTH Walls
Fatigue Cracking
• Failure Mode
– Intermittent to complete electrical open
• Failure History
– Requires an environment with temperature cycling; often occurs after extended
use in the field (“child” or “teenage” mortality)
• Root-Causes
– Resin CTE below specification
– Plating folds
– PTH wall recession
– Resin-rich pockets adjacent to PTH Optical micrograph of cross section of Electron micrograph of same PTH
– Customer use exceeds expected environment PTH with etch damage shown on left
– Insufficient mechanical properties of deposited copper
– Presence of overstress crack Overetching can cause electrical opens or induce overstress
– Plating voids
circumferential cracking
– Etch pits (“mouse bites”)
Ref: Bhandarkar, S. M., et al. "Influence of selected design variables on thermo-mechanical stress distributions in plated-through-hole structures." Journal of
– Insufficient PTH wall thickness Electronic Packaging 114.1 (1992): 8-13.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 117 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 118 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
• Failure History
– Often occurs during assembly; may not be detected until after operation
• Root-Causes
– Openings in PTH’s/Vias are etch pits or plating voids and often occur
because the following manufacturing processes are not optimized:
• Drilling
• Desmear/Etchback
• Electroless copper plating or direct metallization
Optical micrograph of cross section of Optical micrograph of cross section of
• Electrolytic copper plating
PTH with etch damage (bright field) PTH with etch damage (dark field)
• Tin resist deposition
Evidence of overetching can include reduced plating thickness • Etching
– Openings can also occur due to poor design (i.e., single-sided tenting of
and discoloration of PTH barrel walls vias, resulting in entrapment of etchant chemicals)
Ref: Bhandarkar, S. M., et al. "Influence of selected design variables on thermo-mechanical stress distributions in plated-through-hole structures." Journal of Ref: Bhandarkar, S. M., et al. "Influence of selected design variables on thermo-mechanical stress distributions in plated-through-hole structures." Journal of
Electronic Packaging 114.1 (1992): 8-13. Electronic Packaging 114.1 (1992): 8-13.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 119 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 120 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
3. PTH/Via Wall-Pad Separation PTH/Via Wall-Pad Separation
• Failure Mode
– Intermittent or complete electrical open
• Failure History
– Will primarily only occur during assembly
• Root-Causes
– Insufficient Curing of Resin.
– Outgassing of absorbed moisture
– Excessive temperatures during assembly
– Resin CTE or Resin Tg below specification
– Number of nonfunctional lands (only useful for failures during assembly)
Wall-Pad Separation – Drilling process resulting in poor hole quality
Optical micrograph of cross section Optical micrograph of cross section – Insufficient desmearing process.
perpendicular to the PTH axis parallel to the PTH axis – Substandard processes or materials in electroless copper plating
Ref: Bhandarkar, S. M., et al. "Influence of selected design variables on thermo-mechanical stress distributions in plated-through-hole structures." Journal of Ref: Bhandarkar, S. M., et al. "Influence of selected design variables on thermo-mechanical stress distributions in plated-through-hole structures." Journal of
Electronic Packaging 114.1 (1992): 8-13. Electronic Packaging 114.1 (1992): 8-13.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 121 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 122 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 123 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 124 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Evidence of Damage Due to Handling -- Evidence of Damage – Ceramic
BGAs Capacitors
Intermetallic Layer
10μm
Keimasi, Mohammadreza, Michael H. Azarian, and Michael G. Pecht. "Flex Cracking of Multilayer Ceramic Capacitors Assembled With Pb-Free and
Ref: SEM Lab. Tin–Lead Solders." Device and Materials Reliability, IEEE Transactions on 8.1 (2008): 182-192.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 125 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 126 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Intermittent Failures
No Fault Found
• No-Fault-Found (NFF): Failure (fault) occurred or was reported to have occurred during product’s use. The
product was tested to confirm the failure, but the testing showed “no faults” in the product.
• An intermittent failure is the loss of some function in a product for a
limited period of time and subsequent recovery of the function. • Trouble-Not-Identified (TNI): A failure occurred or was reported to have occurred in service or in
manufacturing of a product. But testing could not identify the failure mode.
• If the failure is intermittent, the product’s performance before,
during, or after an intermittent failure event may not be easily • Can-Not-Duplicate (CND): Failures that occurred during manufacture or field operation of a product cut
predicted, nor is it necessarily repeatable. could not be verified or assigned.
• However, an intermittent failure is often recurrent. • No-Problem-Found (NPF): A problem occurred or was reported to have occurred in the field or during
manufacture, but the problem was not found during testing.
• Retest-OK: A failure occurred or was reported to have occurred in a product. On retesting the product at the
factory, test results indicated that there was no problem.
Ref: Qi, Haiyu, Sanka Ganesan, and Michael Pecht. "No-fault-found and intermittent failures in electronic products." Microelectronics Qi, Haiyu, Sanka Ganesan, and Michael Pecht. "No-fault-found and intermittent failures in electronic products." Microelectronics Reliability 48.5 (2008):
Reliability 48.5 (2008): 663-674. 663-674.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 127 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 128 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
The Impact of Intermittents NFF Test Sensitivities
¾ Can not determine root cause and thus the reason for the failure (NFF) Testing has five possible outcomes:
¾ Reliability modeling analysis can be faulty
¾ Potential safety hazards
• Test can say it is good when it is good.
¾ Decreased equipment availability
¾ Long diagnostic time and lost labor time
• Test can say it is bad when it is bad.
¾ Complicated maintenance decisions • Test can say it is good when it is bad.
¾ Customer apprehension, inconvenience and loss of customer confidence • Test can say it is bad when it is good.
¾ Loss of company reputation • Test can be inconsistent.
¾ Increased warranty costs
¾ Extra shipping costs
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 129 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 130 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
• May indicate that a failure has occurred. Intermittent failure may be due
Fretting Contamination
Inner layer Convection
Plating
adhesion Moisture air flow Abuse
Environment Whiskers
Electro-chemical
Corrosion
Pore
Plating
defects Contamination
at interfaces
migration
Contamination
On PCB
Electric field
Vibration,
current
Use
Spacing
Finish Plating
Flaw
Component
to some extreme variation in field or use conditions.
Temperature conditions Pad size
Moisture Temperature
Wiring degradation Dendrites Load
Material Size
Warpage
Vibration
Wear out Aging CTE
Temperature
Wiring Via cracking Copper PCB stiffness
Electromagnetic
interference
Layout
Damaged Misalignment Contaminated
wire Mating surface
Thickness
Quality Via creation
unbalance
Intermittent • May indicate the imminent occurrence of failure.
Plating method Failures in
Interconnect External Soft error Short/Open
Fatigue Electronic
Defects in via Temp. Vibration
crosstalk radiation Circuits Assemblies
Solder cycle
Packaging Electro-
IC
materials migration material Grain size
Dislocation
Handling Temperature
Voids
Temperature
Strain relaxation
• May not leave a failure signature making it difficult to isolate the site.
Metallization Dielectric Ionic Passivation
short breakdown contamination crack Load
Whiskers Wire bond lifts Short
Lead pitch Strength Thermal cycling Vibration Humidity Electro-chemical migration
Force
Ref: Qi, Haiyu, Sanka Ganesan, and
Lead finish Delamination Stress
Loose
Fillet lift Black Non-wets
Socket Michael Pecht. "No-fault-found and
Intermetallic solder Defects
Package Pad Temperature
intermittent failures in electronic products."
Temperature Microelectronics Reliability 48.5 (2008):
Manufacturing Open
Warpage
defects Oversized
663-674 and Bakhshi, Roozbeh, Surya
Moisture
Atmospheric solder InsufficientVoids/cracks Kunche, and Michael Pecht. "Intermittent
contamination Chemistry of solder Failures in Hardware and Software."
Corrosion
Creep
product Components
Component-PCB Interconnects Journal of Electronic Packaging 136.1
corrosion (2014): 011014.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 131 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 132 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Example: Intermittent Failures Due to
Electrical Contact Resistance vs. Fretting Cycles
Fretting Corrosion Initial 100000
• Tin alloys are soft metals on which a thin but hard oxide
layer is rapidly formed. 10000
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 133 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 134 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 135 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 136 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Impact of Laser Scan Parameters Example: Intermittent Failure Due to
Open Trace in PCB
• Open trace can also cause
intermittent failures in PCB under
UV-CO2-UV
50μm
UV-CO2 50μm
environmental loading conditions.
Pattern Plated Cu + Alternative Core Construction
Oxide • Under thermal cycling or vibration
loading, the open trace may
reconnect with intermittent electrical
continuity observations.
1. Sood, Bhanu, Craig B. Arnold, and Alberto Pique. "Depth and surface roughness control on laser micromachined polyimide for direct-write deposition." Micromachining and
Microfabrication Process Technology VIII. Vol. 4979. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2003.
2. Duley, W. W., UV Lasers: effects and applications in materials science, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Ref: A Study in Printed Circuit Board (PCB) Failure Analysis, Part 2, Insight Analytical Labs, Inc
3. Magera, J, “Copper Filled Microvias The New Hidden Threat Links of Faith Are Not Created Equally”, IPC APEX 2019.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 137 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 138 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Example: Intermittent Failures Due to Example: Intermittent Failures Due to Electro-chemical Migration
Electro-chemical Migration (Surface Dendrites) (Conductive Anodic Filament Formation)
• Electrochemical migration (ECM) can cause
• Conductive filament is formed internal to
shorts due to the growth of conductive metal
the board structure.
filaments in a printed wiring board (PWB). Positive
Anode
Conductive
filament
Negative
Cathode
• In CAF, the filament is composed of a
• Surface dendrites can form between the
metallic salt, not neutral metal atoms as in
adjacent traces in the PWB under an applied
dendritic growth.
voltage when surface contaminants and
moisture are present. • One of distinct signatures of CAF failures
is intermittent short circuiting. The
• It is often difficult to identify the failure site
Dendritic growth during an ECM test conductive filament bridging the two
because the fragile dendrite structure will
shorted conductors can blow out due to the
burn upon shorting, often leaving no trace of
high current in the filament, but can form A conductive filament bridging two plated
its presence. through holes in a PWB
Ref: Zhan, Sheng, Michael H. Azarian, and Michael
again if the underlying causes remain in
Pecht. "Reliability of printed circuit boards processed
using no-clean flux technology in temperature–
place.
humidity–bias conditions." Device and Materials
Reliability, IEEE Transactions on 8.2 (2008): 426-434. Ref: Sood, Bhanu, Michael Osterman, and Michael Pecht. "An Examination of Glass-fiber and Epoxy Interface Degradation in Printed Circuit Boards.“
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 139 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 140 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Electrical Resistance vs. Time Due to CAF Example: Intermittent Failures Due to Creep
Corrosion
1.E+09
• Definition
Intermittents – Creep corrosion is a mass transport process in
which solid corrosion products migrate over a
1.E+08
surface.
Resistance (Ohms)
• Failure mode
1.E+07
– On IC packages, creep corrosion can eventually
result in electrical short or signal deterioration due
to the bridging of corrosion products between
Failure Criterion isolated leads.
1.E+06
– Depending on the nature of the environment, the
insulation resistance can vary and cause
intermittents.
1.E+05
100.0 150.0 200.0 250.0 300.0 350.0 400.0
Time (hours) Ref: Thesis “Reliability challenges in airside economization and oil immersion cooling”, Jimil Shah, 2016.
Ref: Sood, Bhanu, Michael Osterman, and Michael Pecht. "An Examination of Glass-fiber and Epoxy Interface Degradation in Printed Circuit Boards.“
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 141 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 142 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Intermittent Failures Due to Tin Whiskers Intermittent Failures Due to Black Pad
• Whiskers are elongated single crystals of Sn which
grow spontaneously out of the surface. Internal • The ‘Black Pad’ phenomenon in
stresses within the plated deposit drives growth.
• Tin (and other conductive) whiskers or parts of
Black Pad Electroless Nickel over Immersion Gold
Whiskers (ENIG) board finish manifests itself as
whiskers may break loose and bridge isolated
conductors, resulting in an intermittent short gray to black appearance of the solder pad
Failed relay due to tin circuit. These field failures are difficult to duplicate
vapor arcing coupled with either poor solderability or
Whiskers on the armature of a or are intermittent because at high enough current
Accelerator position sensor board relay the conductive whisker can melt, thus removing the solder connection, which may cause
connections
failure condition. Alternatively, disassembly or intermittent electrical ‘opens.’
handling may dislodge a failure-producing whisker.
Nickel • Bulwith et al. [2002] identified numerous
• Failure analysis concluded that tin whiskers
initiated the current surge to the ground. Once a Copper Pad Ball Grid Array (BGA) package
whisker bridged a terminal stud to the armature, intermittent electrical open failures to be
plasma arcing could occur with enough voltage and black pad related.
current to damage the relay.
1. Davy, Gordon. "Relay Failure Caused by Tin Whiskers." (2002).
Tin whisker on the edge of an 2. Sood, Bhanu, Michael Osterman, and Michael Pecht. "Tin whisker analysis of Toyota's electronic
acceleration position sensor throttle controls." Circuit World 37.3 (2011): 4-9.
3. Leidecker, H., L. Panashchenko, and J. Brusse. "Electrical failure of an accelerator pedal position Zeng, Kejun, et al. "Root cause of black pad failure of solder joints with electroless nickel/immersion gold plating." Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena
board connection terminal of a 2002 sensor caused by a tin whisker and investigative techniques used for whisker detection." 5th in Electronics Systems, 2006. ITHERM'06. The Tenth Intersociety Conference on. IEEE, 2006.
Toyota Camry International tin whisker symposium. 2011.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 143 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 144 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
MLCC Construction
• Ceramic Dielectric
CASE STUDY* – Typically comprised of compounds made with
titanium oxides
¾ BaTiO3 (“X7R”) for this study
• Electrodes
Failure Analysis of Multilayer – Base metal consisting of nickel (BME)
¾ Precious metal consisting of silver/ palladium (PME) Ref: Kemet
Ceramic Capacitor (MLCC) with • End Termination
Cross-section of a MLCC
Dielectric
– Standard termination consists of silver or copper
Low Insulation Resistance coated with nickel and tin Electrode
¾ Flexible termination consists of a silver filled
polymer coated with nickel and tin
End
* Adapted from: termination
1. Shrivastava, A., Sood, B., Azarian, M., Osterman, M., & Pecht, M. (2010, June). An investigation into a low insulation resistance failure of multilayer
ceramic capacitors. In Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), 2010 Proceedings 60th (pp. 1811-1815). IEEE.
2. Brock, Garry Robert. "The Effects of Environmental Stresses on the Reliability of Flexible and Standard Termination Multilayer Ceramic Capacitors." PhD
diss., 2009.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 145 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 146 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
OHM
EDS Line Scan Showing Silver and EDS Map Showing Silver Migration and
Palladium in Area of the Metallic Bridge Voiding in Ceramic
100
Ag
Pd
80
electrode electrode
Counts
60
40 Background
Pd level of Ag
Ag
20
0
10 Distance [μm] 20 30
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 151 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 152 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Failure Mechanism
• Metal migration was found in several of the failed MLCCs.
• Voids in the ceramic, without silver or palladium, were also
found close to the conduction path. Non-Destructive Techniques
• The failure mechanism was electrochemical co-migration of
silver and palladium, aided by porosity in the dielectric.
• Electrical Testing
• Scanning Acoustic Microscopy (SAM)
• X-ray Inspection
• X-ray Fluorescence (XRF)
• Optical Inspection
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 153 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 154 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 155 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 156 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Digital Multimeters LCR Meters and Impedance Analyzers
• Typically provide: • Variable AC voltage and
– Voltage (DC, AC rms) frequency.
– Resistance (2 wire) • Used to characterize
– Current
– Capacitors
• Other common – Inductors
options: – Transformers
– Resistance (4 wire)
– Filters
– Frequency or count
– Diode voltage – Dielectric materials
– Capacitance (e.g., PCB substrates)
Agilent 34401A Agilent 4263B
– Temperature
– Datalogging
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 157 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 158 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 159 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 160 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Curve Tracer or Parameter Analyzer
Automated PCB Test Equipment
• Dedicated Wired Grid – test probes wired to the grid. High cost.
• Universal Grid (“Bed of Nails”) –Low cost, reusable. Spring loaded or rigid test probes
in mechanical contact to the grid.
Normal I-V curve
Normal I-V curve • Flying Probe or Fixtureless System with moveable single or double probes. Expensive.
Empirical techniques applied on capacitance /impedance data to determine a good board.
Good for micro products. Issues with pad damage.
Common Applications
Defects specific to IC packages include:
• Delamination at wirebonds, substrate metallization, dielectric layers, element
attaches, and lid seals.
• Die-attach field-failure mechanisms induced by improper die mounting and de-
adhesion.
• Delamination of the molding compound from the leadframe, die, or paddle
• Molding compound cracks
• Die tilt
• Voids and pinholes in the molding compound and die attach
Scanning Acoustic Microscopy Other applications:
• Flip Chips
• Bonded Wafers
• Printed Circuit Boards
• Capacitors
• Ceramics
• Metallic
• Power Devices/Hybrids
• Medical Devices
• Material Characterization
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 163 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 164 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Common Applications Scanning Acoustic Modes
A-Scan: Raw ultrasonic data. It is the received
RF signal from a single point (in x,y).
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 167 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 168 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Applications and Examples Applications: CT Visualization and Software
Typical applications include:
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 169 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 170 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
• For samples on or below thick metal layers such as large heat sinks as seen in power devices, X-ray imaging
is more difficult and requires high voltages and currents.
• Magnification using contact X-ray equipment can only be done externally by a magnified view of the 1:1
photo, or from an enlarged image of the negative. Hence, resolution will decrease as the image is enlarged.
X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF)
• The operator may have to experiment with voltage settings and exposure times, depending on the type of
sample and film used, to obtain proper contrast and brightness in the photos.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 171 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 172 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Types of Analysis Background on X-Ray Fluorescence
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 173 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 174 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Conclusion
• XRF is a powerful tool to analyze composition and coating thickness on a
variety of electronic products
• A non-destructive tool, does not require sample preparation, provides
quick analysis results
• Users should be aware of the issues related to the automated analysis Visual Inspection
software
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 175 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 176 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
External Visual Inspection Analytical Techniques
Low power stereo
macroscope (up to 65x) • Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy (ESEM)
– Overview • Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS)
– Package level
– PCB level
• Thermo-mechanical Analysis
• Microtesting (Wire Pull, Ball Bond and Solder Ball Shear,
Cold Bump Pull)
Higher power light optical
microscopes • Decapsulation / Delidding
• Dye Penetrant Inspection (Dye and Pry)
• Inverted
• Upright
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 179 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 180 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Applications Limitations
• By eliminating the need for a conductive coating, SEM allows imaging of delicate structures and
permits subsequent energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) compositional analysis. • Large samples have to be sectioned to enable viewing in a SEM or an E-SEM, due to the limited size of the sample chamber.
• Only black and white images are obtained. Images can be enhanced with artificial color. Thus, different elements in the same area, having
• An ESEM (a variant of SEM) can image wet, dirty, and oily samples. The contaminants do not close atomic numbers may not be readily distinguished as in optical viewing.
damage the system or degrade the image quality.
• Samples viewed at high magnifications for extended periods of time can be damaged by the electron beam (e.g., fiber/resin delamination can
be initiated this way).
• The ESEM can acquire electron images from samples as hot as 1500ºC because the detector is
• Areas having elements with large atomic number differences are not easily viewed simultaneously; increasing the contrast to view the low
insensitive to heat. atomic number element effectively makes the high atomic number element appear white, while decreasing the contrast allows a clear view
of the high atomic number element, the image of the low atomic number element is drastically compromised.
• ESEM can provide materials and microstructural information such as grain size distribution, surface • Variations in the controllable pressure and gun voltage can allow samples to appear differently. Lower pressure and voltage give for more
roughness and porosity, particle size, materials homogeneity, and intermetallic distribution. surface detail; the same surface can look smoother by just increasing the pressure. Therefore, sample comparisons before and after
experiments, especially cleaning treatments should always be examined under the same conditions.
• ESEM can be used in failure analyses to examine the location of contamination and mechanical • Image quality is determined by scan rate; the slower the scan rate, the higher the quality. However, at lower scan rates, the image takes a
damage, provide evidence of electrostatic discharge, and detect microcracks. longer time to be fully acquired and displayed. Therefore, sample movement appears visually as jerky motions. A trade off must be made
between image quality and visual mobility.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 181 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 182 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Applications
X-ray analysis can be used to detect:
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 187 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 188 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Thermal Techniques - Use TMA (Samples A and B)*
• All techniques are destructive to the sample • Coefficient of thermal expansion before
– Sample will be heated above transitions TMA Sample A glass transition temperature (alpha 1)
– Will have to be cut to fit in instrument and after glass transition temperature
• All techniques use small samples (alpha 2) is determined.
– 10 mg or so for DSC and TGA • Glass transition temperature (Tg) is also
– Samples from 5 to 40 mm long for TMA and DMA determined.
What Is Micro-sectioning of
Printed Circuit Board?
Technique used to evaluate printed wiring board quality by
exposing a cross-section at a selected plane such as
¾ Plated through-holes
Metallographic Sample Preparation* ¾Plating thickness
¾ Via
¾ Soldered connections
¾Delamination in PCB
¾Inner layer connections
*- Adapted from Buehler Limited/ITW
192
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 191 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 192 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Primary Purpose of Micro-sectioning Goal of Specimen Preparation
Reveal the true microstructure of all
• To monitor the processes rather than to perform final materials
inspection because it makes no sense to add value to ¾Induce no defects during specimen
a product that is already rejectable!
preparation
• Therefore, the objective is to detect any deviations ¾ Obtain reproducible results
from normal in the manufacturing processes as early ¾Use the least number of steps in the shortest
as possible to avoid adding value to a defective time possible
product. Corrections to the process should then be
made as soon as possible. ¾ Achieve a cost effective operation
193 194
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 193 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 194 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Preparation Steps
Documentation
‘Each step is equally important” ¾ Process data: vendor, material,
¾ Documentation batch #, part #, sampling
¾ Sectioning ¾ Description of specimen orientation,
location, cut area, Macro image
¾ Mounting
¾ Type of analysis and defect, area of
¾ Grinding and Polishing
interest
¾ Visual Examination
¾ Record mounting, polishing, etching
¾ Etching parameters
¾ Analysis ¾ Record microstructure data:
inclusions, porosity, grain size, etc.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 195 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 196 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Sectioning Methods
¾ Equipment Method Comments
¾ Blade, wheel (SiC, alumina, diamond) Shearing Severe torsion damage to an undetermined distance adjacent to the
¾ Load cutting edges
¾ Blade RPM Hollow punch Convenient, and rapid but limited to boards 0.08” thick or less
¾ Feed rate (Saved hole)
¾ Coolant Routing Rapid and versatile with moderate damage but noisy and hard to
¾ Delicate materials may require encapsulation or chuck control.
padding for holding Band saw Rapid, convenient moderate damage and easy to control when a 24-
32 pitch blade is used at 3500-4500 ft./min.
Low speed saw Least damage of any method allowing cuts to be made even into the
edge of the plated through-hole barrel. However, it is too slow for
high volume micro-sectioning.
Precision table Least destructive method of removing specimens from component
saw mounted boards for soldered connection analysis
197 198
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 197 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 198 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
199 200
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 199 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 200 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Mounting Method Selection Potting Compounds
Castable (cold) mounting Compression (hot) mounting
•Resin/hardener selection • Compound selection Resin of Choice?…EPOXY!
•Vacuum • Pressure
•Additives for edges, conductivity • Heat x Low shrinkage and moderate hardness
are important for microelectronics.
- Less surface relief
Specimen characteristics to consider:
•Softening/melting temperature - Better edge protection
•Sample thickness, ability to withstand pressure x Uncured epoxy typically has low viscosity
•Brittleness, friability for filling small cavities.
•Porosity
•Hardness & abrasion resistance relative to x Epoxy can be cast while under
mounting compound vacuum. This enhances its cavity
•Importance of edge retention filling ability.
201 202
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 201 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 202 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
203 204
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 203 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 204 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Polishing Principles Polishing
Time
¾ Further refinement of ground surface using resilient cloth surfaces charged
with abrasive particles
¾ Each step must remove the surface scratches and sub-
¾ Depending on material characteristics, cloth selected may be woven,
surface deformation from the previous step
pressed or napped
¾ Increase time to increase material removal
¾ Commonly used abrasives are diamond and alumina
¾ Smaller increments in abrasive size require shorter times at
¾ The polishing process consists of one to three steps that:
each step
1. Remove damage from the last grinding step
¾ Increases in surface area may require longer times
2. Produce progressively finer scratches & lesser depth of damage
¾ Too long times on certain cloths can produce edge rounding
3. Maintain edges and flatness and relief
4. Keep artifacts to an absolute minimum
205 206
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 205 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 206 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
208
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 207 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 208 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Etching Principles Etching Techniques
• Immersion – sample immersed directly into etchant solution
¾ Etching is a process of controlled corrosion
• Most commonly used method
¾ Selective dissolution of components at different rates reveals the
microstructure • Requires gentle agitation to remove reaction products
¾ Completion of etching is determined better by close observation than • Swab – polished surface swabbed with cotton ball soaked with etchant
timing • Preferred method for materials in which staining is a problem
¾ Etching is best performed on a freshly polished surface before a • Electrolytic – chemical action supplemented with electric current
passive layer can form • Attack controlled by chemical selection, time, amps
¾ A dry surface produces a clearer etched structure than a wet one
¾ An under-etched surface may be re-etched but an over-etched
surface requires re-polishing
209
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 209 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 210 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
PWB Etchants
(For Copper) Dye Penetrant (Dye and Pry)
• Identify failed components (electrical
¾ Equal parts 3% H2O2 and ammonium hydroxide, swab measurement)
• Boards are immersed in stripping agent (Miller-
for 3 to 10 seconds, use fresh etchant to reveal grain Stephenson MS-111) for 25 min at room
boundaries of plating and cladding copper material. temperature to remove the solder mask. IPA can
be used for a final rinse. Dry in air.
• Dye is applied to the board (DYKEM steel red
layout fluid) with a pipette. Important: Flip the
¾ 5 g Fe(NO3) 3, 25 mL HCl, 70 mL water, immerse 10 – board, so that the dye flows into the cracks
• Place boards in vacuum for 5 minutes so that the
30 seconds, reveals grain boundaries very well. dye penetrates into fine cracks that otherwise
would be blocked by trapped air pockets. A
strong vacuum pressure is not important for this
process (Typical 220 mm Hg)
• Place the board on a hot plate for 30min 80㼻C to
dry the dye (as prescribed by DYKEM).
211
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 211 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 212 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Dye and Pry Steps Potential Nonconformities
(For BGAs)
• Flex the board with a pair of pliers until the components peel away.
• Remove the components with tweezers and fix with double sided tape on the board,
because it is important to see the component side and the substrate side to identify the
failure site.
1. Solder Fail Component
(component side)
2. Solder Fail 1
(substrate side)
3. Pad Lift BGA
4. Trace Fail
4
2
Pad
Trace
3
Substrate
Picture: “Solder joint failure analysis” Dye penetrate technique
BY TERRY BURNETTE and THOMAS KOSCHMIEDER
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 213 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 214 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Pad Crater
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 215 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 216 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
FIB Introduction FIB Cross-section of Bumps
SEM image of a die- Ag antenna
20μm
• Focused ion beam (FIB) processing involves directing a focused beam of bump interface after
gallium ions onto a sample. FIB etching. Overview Bump
of the interface in
• FIB etching serves as a supplement to lapping and cleaving methods for
failure. The beam of ions bombarding the sample's surface dislodges (a) shows the bump, Die Metallization
antenna,
5μm
(b) and (c) show close 5μm
Bump
Bump
up of the bump at
Ag antenna Ag antenna
two sides.
Passivation
Passivation
Ref: Sood, Bhanu, et al. "Failure site isolation on passive RFID tags." Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated
Circuits, 2008. IPFA 2008. 15th International Symposium on the. IEEE, 2008.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 217 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 218 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 219 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 220 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Magnetic Imaging Used to Locate Failures Site Isolation of CAF in PCBs Using SQUID[1]
• Scanning quantum interference device
(SQUID) microscope is a sensitive near-field
magnetic imaging system.
• System can detect magnetic fields as faint as
20 picotesla. Its sensitivity is high enough to
image currents as small as 600nA at a 100 mm
working distance with 30 ms averaging.
(Time (Frequency
Domain) Domain)
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 223 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 224 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Properties of an Infrared Spectrum Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
• An infrared spectrum contains absorption peaks corresponding to the – Spectrum Interpretation
frequencies of vibration of the atoms of the molecules making up the sample.
1.0
0.8
Infrared Spectrum
0.6
of Acetic Acid
Butyl Ester
0.4
0.2
0.0
• Failure analysis
– Identification of contaminants
– Identification of corrosion products
Chromatography
– Identification of adhesive composition change
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 227 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 228 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Ion-exchange Chromatography Example of IC Results on a Mixture of
Anions
• Ion exchange chromatography exploits ionic interactions and competition • The eluent was 0.01 mol/L NaOH.
to realize analyte separation. • The column used was an Dionex AS11.
• It can be further classified into Standard 1 Position 15
– cation exchange chromatography (CEC): separates positively charged ions; and 10.0μS
2 - Chloride - 2.400
6.0
• The output of an IC test is a graph of conductivity versus time. 4.0
3 - Nitrite - 2.650
5 - Nitrate - 3.992
1 - Fluoride - 1.775
• Calibration is with standards of known composition (elution time) and 2.0
4 - Bromide - 3.808
6 - 4.817
7 - Sulfate - 6.508
8 - 7.783
concentration (peak area). -1.0 min
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00
• Depending upon the identified root cause, processes interrupted may be • Although many immediate actions may correct
re-started if corrective action (s) can be implemented that will prevent the symptoms,
recurrence of the failure, or sufficiently minimize its impact. – temporary solutions may not be financially justifiable
over the “long haul”; and
– there is a large risk that a temporary solution may not
solve the problem.
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 233 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 234 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 235 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 236 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Questions?
Failures of a Failure Analysis Program
IPC APEX EXPO 2020 237 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov IPC APEX EXPO 2020 238 February 3rd, 2020 bhanu.sood@nasa.gov
Acknowledgements
ÏNASA GSFC SMA Mission Assurance Directorate Thank you!
ÏNASA GSFC Risk and Reliability Branch (Code 371)
ÏNASA Workmanship Program
Bhanu Sood, PhD