Professional Documents
Culture Documents
K01804 - 20181114170046 - Exercise Chi
K01804 - 20181114170046 - Exercise Chi
1. (a)
(b)
(c)
4. Step 1: Hypothesis
Die is fair
Die is not fair
1 7 60×1/6=10
2 12 60×1/6=10
3 8 60×1/6=10
4 15 60×1/6=10
5 11 60×1/6=10
6 7 60×1/6=10
Step 3: Critical region
Step 5: Conclusion
Not enough evidence at 5% significance level to conclude that the die is not fair.
Step 1: Hypothesis
Mon 75 400×1/5=80
Wed 88 400×1/5=80
Thu 97 400×1/5=80
Fri 25 400×1/5=80
Step 3: Critical region
Step 5: Conclusion
There is enough evidence at 5% significance level to conclude that the orders are
not evenly distributed.
6. Step 1: Hypothesis
Senior 50 200×0.19=38
Junior 46 200×0.23=46
Sophomor 55 200×0.27=54
e
Freshmen 49 200×0.31=62
Step 5: Conclusion
There is enough evidence at 10% significance level to conclude that the sample is
non-random.
7. Step 1: Hypothesis
Step 5: Conclusion
There is not enough evidence at 1% significance level to conclude that the gender
and response are related.
8. Step 1: Hypothesis
The number of plant sold is not related with the location of his portable plant
stall
The number of plant sold is related with the location of his portable plant
stall
Step 5: Conclusion
Step 5: Conclusion
Test of homogeneity is use to test the equality of characteristic of two or more population
with regards to different characteristic or distribution. For examples the preference of
working women and non-working women in buying the brands comestic product,
Opinion Row
Total
Favor Oppose Uncertain
Step 5: Conclusion
There is not enough evidence at 2.5% significance level to conclude that the
distribution of opinions is not homogeneous for the two groups.
12. Contigency table
Instructor A Instructor B
p-value
since the contingency table is 2×2, the degree of freedom is 1, thus the value of
lies between p-value of 0.05 and 0.10.
Therefore,
The people belong to different income group are homogeneous with regard
to playing lotteries
The people belong to different income group are not homogeneous with
regard to playing lotteries
Step 5: Conclusion
There is enough evidence at 2.5% significance level to conclude that the different
income group are not homogeneous with regard to playing lotteries