Soy Milk Yoghurt

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment

ISSN: 1310-2818 (Print) 1314-3530 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tbeq20

Soy Milk Yoghurt

Z.R. Denkova & I.D. Murgov

To cite this article: Z.R. Denkova & I.D. Murgov (2005) Soy Milk Yoghurt, Biotechnology &
Biotechnological Equipment, 19:1, 193-195, DOI: 10.1080/13102818.2005.10817180

To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2005.10817180

© 2005 Taylor and Francis Group, LLC

Published online: 15 Apr 2014.

Submit your article to this journal

Article views: 379

View related articles

Citing articles: 1 View citing articles

Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at


https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tbeq20
SOY MILK YOGHURT
Z.R.Denkova, I.D.Murgov
University of Food Technologies, Plovdiv, Bulgaria

ABSTRACT
The influence of the initial dry substance of reconstituted soymilk and two types of starter
cultures (single-strain and symbiotic) of Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus and
Streptococcus thermophilus on the fermentation process duration and the fermented milk
quality was investigated. Witht 10% initial dry substance of the soymilk and 1% of the
starter cultures for Bulgarian yoghurt the fermentation continued for2.5 h. The soy milk
yoghurt had a titratable acidity of 65-75ºT and the cell titre reached 1010 cfu/cm3. The soy
milk yoghurt retained its organoleptic qualities when stored for up to 3 days at tempera-
tures of 25-30ºC and for 15 days at 4-6º.

Introduction purposes of this study. Their composition


Soy and soy products occupy a traditional included selected strains of Lactobacillus
position in the diet of Far East nations. delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus and Streptococ-
They are very well received in the rest of cus thermophilus.
the world as well. Soymilk yoghurt has The fresh soymilk was prepared by dis-
been studied extensively (6, 8). Fermented solving dried soymilk in water. After ste-
soy milk products may be beneficial from rilization, it was poured into jars and ino-
an economic and nutritional point of view culated with 1% of the indicated starter
since they can be prepared with higher cultures for sour milk. It was thermostated
protein levels at a comparable or lower cost at a temperature of 42ºC until coagulation
than regular fermented milk products (2). of the soymilk.
Soy proteins have a favourable amino acid The titre of the viable cells was deter-
balance meeting the essential amino acid mined by inoculation of the cultures in a
requirements except for methionine (7). medium of LAPTg10 (g/dm3): peptone –
The research of a number of authors (1, 3, 15, tripton – 10, yeast extract – 10, glucose
4) has indicated a lot of advantages of soy – 10, Tween 80 – 1, distilled water up to 1
milk products for the nutrition of children dm3, agar-agar – 15, pH 6.6.
and adults suffering from allergies, diabe- The titratable acidity was determined ti-
tes, cancer, heart and renal diseases. trimetrically by a 0.1 n NaOH with phenol-
Soymilk products and soymilk yoghurt can phthalein as an indicator and it represented
successfully replace the fermented milk the used up millilitres of a 0.1 n NaOH for
products from cow’s milk (3, 4, 9). neutralization of the acid in 100 cm3 of the
The present study has aimed at investi- product expressed in Toerner’s degree (ºT).
gating the possibilities of obtaining
soymilk yoghurt (sour soymilk) and deter- Results and Discussion
mining some characteristic properties of It is necessary that the organoleptic indices
the final product. of sour soymilk be close to those of Bul-
garian yoghurt. Therefore the relationship
Materials and Methods between the dried soymilk and the water
Two types of starter cultures for Bulgarian used for the preparation of the fresh
yoghurt (Y-I and Y-A) were used for the soymilk, which was inoculated with the

193 Biotechnol. & Biotechnol. Eq. 19/2005/1


TABLE 1
Characteristics of soymilk yoghurt depending on the dry substance of reconstituted soymilk
Starter culture Dry sub- Taste Flavour Consistency
for sour milk stance, %
9 of fermented milk with slightly of sour milk loose
expressed soy off-taste
10 of fermented milk with slightly of sour milk thick coagulum of sour
Y-I expressed soy off-taste milk
11 of fermented milk with clearly of sour milk very thick coagulum
expressed soy off-taste
9 of fermented milk with slightly of sour milk loose
expressed soy off-taste
Y-A 10 of fermented milk with slightly of sour milk thick coagulum of sour
expressed soy off-taste milk
11 of fermented milk with clearly of sour milk very thick coagulum
expressed soy off-taste

TABLE 2
Physicochemical indices of soymilk yoghurt
Yoghurt Titre of viable cells, cfu/g Titratable acidity, ºT Coagulation time, h
Y-1 1.2.1010 65 2.5
Y-A 2.5.1010 66 2.5

symbiotic lactic acid bacterial cultures, was yoghurt preparation from cow’s milk
investigated. The taste, flavour and consis- (Table 2).
tency of the final soymilk yoghurt were The soymilk coagulation time and the ti-
determined. The results of the experimental tratable acidity at the end of the process
studies are given in Table 1. were similar to those observed during Bul-
The data in the table show that the garian yoghurt preparation (2.5 hours and
soymilk yoghurt obtained was similar to titratable acidity of about 65-79 ºT).
Bulgarian yoghurt when soymilk with 10% The yoghurt durability during storage
of dry substance was used, with both types was determined at room temperature (25-
of starter cultures. The yoghurt resembled 30 ºC) and in refrigeration conditions (4-
Bulgarian yoghurt in taste and flavour and 6 ºC) (Table 3).
at the same time possessed the dietetic The soymilk yoghurt prepared with the
properties of soy products. Y-I starter culture could be stored for 3
Sour soymilks were prepared from fresh days at 25 – 30 ºC and for 15 days in re-
soymilk with the starter cultures Y-I and Y- frigeration conditions (4 – 6 ºC), whereas
A for Bulgarian yoghurt as shown in Table the product prepared with the Y-A starter
1. The coagulation time of the milk, the culture rapidly increased its acidity at 25-
titre of viable cells and the titratable acidity 30 ºC and retained its organoleptic indices
of the final soymilk yoghurt were deter- for 15 days at 4 – 6 ºC.
mined. On the bases of the experimental work
The soymilk prepared with both types of done, the following conclusions can be
starter cultures had a high content of living drawn:
cells (1010 cfu/g) and the fermentation It was established that soymilk yoghurt
process did not differ from the one during with good physicochemical and organoleptic

Biotechnol. & Biotechnol. Eq. 19/2005/1 194


TABLE 3
Change in the titratable acidity of soymilk yoghurt during its storage
Storage at temperatures of 25 – 30 ºC Storage at temperatures of 4 – 6 ºC
Yoghurt Titratable acidity, ºT Titratable acidity, ºT
1 day 2 days 3 days 6 days 7 days 7 days 15 days
Y-1 65 100 113 145 145 75 75
Y-A 66 110 137 165 170 80 80

qualities was obtained from reconstituted 4. Nsofor L., Nsofor O.N., Udegbe C., Nwoke E.C.
soymilk with 10% dry substance. (1996) J. Food Research International. 29(5-6), 549-
Soymilk yoghurt is prepared with a high 553.
content of viable cells (1010 cfu/g) and it 5. Shirai K., Pedrasa G., Duran M.G., Marshall
can be stored for 3 days at 25 – 30 ºC and V.M.E., Moiseev S.R., Gaibay M.G. (1992a) Sci.
for more than 2 weeks in refrigeration con- Food Agric. 59, 199-204.
ditions. 6. Shirai K., Pedrasa G., Duran M.G., Marshall
V.M.E., Moiseev S.R., Gaibay M.G. (1992) Sci.
REFERENCES Food Agric. 59, 205-210.
1. Chang C.-Y., Stone M.B. (1990) J. of Food Sci- 7. Snyder H.E., Kwon T.W. (1998) Soybean utili-
ence 55(6), 1643-1646. zation. AVI Publication, New York.
2. Karlekind K., Laye I., Halpin E., Morr C.V. 8. Yadav V.B., Jha Y.K., Garg S.K., Mital B.K.
(1991) J. Food Sci., 56, 999-1001. (1994) The Australian J. Dairy Technol., 49, 34-38.
3. Kyung-Hee Kim, Yong-Tae Ko (1987) Korean J. 9. Cheng Y.I., Thompson L.D., Brittin N.C. (1990)
Food Sci.Technol., 19(2), 151-155. J. Food Science, 55(4), 1178-1179.

195 Biotechnol. & Biotechnol. Eq. 19/2005/1

You might also like