Perspectives

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

 

Understanding the human mind requires consideration of all psychological perspectives.


It greatly influenced the psychology that is widely known. However, if you asked me which
perspective I believe to be both more and less scientific, I would have to say the biological
perspective as the most scientific, whereas the least scientific is the psychological perspective.

The biological perspectives are more scientific in nature. A belief that our behavior is
merely the result of basic biology. It focused on studying human neurological functions by
testing and analyzing them to provide data that would back up claims. Given that it offers
reasons for the behavior, it can readily contribute to an increase in the population receiving
treatment. Repeating the experiments under study ensures that they are reliable, measurable, and
objective. An example of this approach would be when you see an adolescent being irritable.
From a biological perspective, one would consider hormones and heredity as the sources of this
action, thus affecting the behavior. I think that evolutionary views help us understand and
explain the mind scientifically since our mental lives and behavior reflect the evolutionary
history of our species.

The reason why I chose the psychological perspective as the least scientific one is
because it disregards biological components and concentrates on cognitive, behavioral, and
emotional components of the concept. I believe it is impossible to study unobservable behavior
objectively. It is therefore difficult to imagine that it was more scientific.

According to the psychodynamic view, each person’s level of consciousness is driven by


a series of deep insights into how people respond to a situation. This is in accordance with
Sigmund Freud's idea of structural personality, which contributed greatly to the field of
psychology. In my opinion, this view would be difficult to test. It would take a while to have
convincing and sufficient data, especially when discussing the unconscious mind.

Another downside of this perspective is the humanistic viewpoint, which is so focused on


the positive that it forgets to overlook all of the psychological issues. Free will behavior is
explained by unscientific reliance. The sociocultural view, which is based on social and cultural
factors that can influence a person's perception, stereotypes, and attitude. Negative stereotypes
can be detrimental to individuals' quality of life and can have a major consequence on the way
people in society are perceived and treated.

In conclusion, I view the psychological perspective as being empirically weak, nebulous,


and untestable since unconscious processes are not amenable to scientific measurement or
observation, whereas the biological perspective relies on scientific method. There may be several
different views, but they all aim for the same goal, which is to develop a perspective that would
help us gain a better understanding of the human mind.
Bhondwe, Ashlesha. Buzzle. Biological Perspective. January 17, 2011

Cherry, Kendra. About.com Psychology. What is the Biological Perspective? 2012

Genevieve. Genevieve's Biological Perspective Page.

McLeod, Saul. Simply Psychology. Psychology Perspectives. 2007

You might also like