Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Journal Knee Chest Position
Journal Knee Chest Position
Improves Pulmonary
Oxygenation in Elderly
Patients Undergoing Lower
Spinal Surgery with Spinal
J. Clin. Anesth. 3:361-366, 1991 Anesthesia
*Assistant Professor, Department of Anes-
thesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hi-
roshima University Katsuyuki Moriwaki, MD, PhD,* Hiroshi Sasaki,
tStaff Anesthesiologist, Department of
MD,? Minoru Kubota, MD,+ Akimitsu Higaki,
Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, MD,$ Tomoki Yoshida, MD,/1Osafumi Yuge, MD,
Hiroshima City Asa Hospital
PhD,# Michio Morio, MD, PhD**
*Instructor, Department of Anesthesiology
and Critical Care Medicine, Hiroshima Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hiroshima University
University and Hiroshima City Asa Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Table 1. Patient Demographics, Anesthesia Dosages, and Peak Dermatome of Sensory Anesthesia
Dose of
Peak Dermatome*
Number of Age Sex Weight Height Tetracaine
Age-group Patients (yr) (M/F) (kg) (cm) (mg) Supine Knee-Chest
Teens and 20s 8 19.4 ? 6.5 612 55.4 2 10.8 167.3 * 12.7 10.1 ? 2.5 Th7 Th7
30s 13 35.2 ? 3.4 518 66.8 +- 14.0 164.2 ? 7.3 10.1 2 1.9 Th7 Th8
40s 9 43.3 * 1.7 613 62.8 t 10.7 158.6 + 9.6 10.3 5 1.9 Th8 Th8
50s 12 55.6 ? 2.4 418 62.3 ? 11.5 159.9 * 8.1 10.4 * 0.9 Th7 Th7
60s 8 64.6 2 2.9 513 59.5 * 9.0 152.3 + 9.1 10.4 * 1.4 Th7 Th7
70s 6 74.0 * 2.8 412 55.7 * 10.4 152.3 ? 11.8 8.1 * 1.9 Th7 Th7
‘l‘eens and 20s 78.0 2 5.2 71.S + (i.7 NS 8.5.S -c “5.2 SC.0 + !I.!, KS
30s 82.1 2 7.6 Hi.5 k I I .O NS 72.9 k I-t.6 is..5 k II).0 KS
40s 73.1 2 10.3 80.3 + 7.4 NS 7S. 1 f 1.jA 7x.2 + 7.8 h’s
50s 90.1 + 12.9 85.3 k 9.4 h’s 7G.S k 2 I .x 21.5 ‘-+ 16.3 NS
60s 79.X ? 6.1 X4.0 + T.ti NS Xl.(i 2 10.9 x1.5 k IS.7 KS
70s 91.5 + 13.9 H9.5 k IX.2 h’s HO.” -t I4.i XC.2 2 17.5* fJ < I).().‘,
Table 3. Changes in Patient Arterial Blood YI’ensions (PaCO, and PaO,) and Arterial Oxygen ~Tension Dif’f’erences
(A-aDO,)
Teens
and 20s 36.6 -’ 4.3 3Y.3 ? 3.(b p C 0.05 Y6.6 IT 6.4 95.3 f 4.7 NS 7.3 t 4.6 6.0 t 3.5 NS
30s 36.4 ? .5.3 3Y.2 2 3.4” p i 0.05 Y2.8 + 10.1 92.2 t 7.6 NS 1 I.5 5 Y.8 X.6 t 3.4 NS
40s 37.6 t 3.1 38.9 2 2.3 NS YO.4 +- 8.Y Y2.Y t 3.0 NS 12.3 I! 7.7 8.2 t .i.I NS
50s 36.7 2 3.5 40.0 t- 2.7” p < 0.005 80.0 + 11.3h 87.4 ? lO.l* p < 0.0.5 24.0 i 12.2” 13.2 ir 8.72 p < 0.05
60s 37.5 2 3.7 40.5 2 2.8‘1 p < 0.05 78.1 ? Y.6’, 88.0 +- 8.5~~ p < 0.0.5 24.7 t ll.lh 11.3 ? 8.3” p < 0.05
70s 36.6 I 3.6 40.7 ? 2.6 NS 82.9 2 6.9’1 Y2.5 ‘-’ 6.5~~ p < 0.00.5 2l.j ? 7.7” 3.6 f 2.2,g p < 0.05
significant change in PaCO, was observed among pa- liters, and 1.76 2 0.72 liters, respectively. ‘1’LC and
tients in their 40s and 70s. FRC increased significantly (p < 0.05 and $I < 0.005,
respectively) when the subjects were turned to the
knee-chest position from the supine position. How-
Pulmonary Function Tests in Unanesthetized ever, the change in CC was not significant between
Healthy Volunteers these two positions.
present study may have been due to a reduction of tiotl presumably provides bettel- puhnonar) oxygrt~-
the intrapulmonary shunt caused by blood pooling in ation than does rhe supine position. Further stud\ i>
a sympathectomized leg in the dependent position required to confirm I his effect under gw~el-al
and a decrease in pulmonary blood flow. anesthesia.
Because we did not study postural changes in the I ri conclusion, a significant increase in pulnionar)
intrapulmonary shunt or in the ventilation-perfusion oxygenation was seen in older patients who under-
ratios, we cannot determine the precise mechanism(s) went lower spinal operations with spinal anesthesia
of the improvement in pulmonary oxygenation seen when they were turned from the supine to the knee-
in older patients in the knee-chest position. Further chest position. ‘l‘hese results suggest that the knee-
study is necessary to confirm the underlying mecha- chest position has a beneficial effect on pulmonary
nism of this phenomenon. oxygenation in older patients who undergo spinal
General anesthesia is more common for lower spinal anesthesia.
operations in the knee-chest position.’ Little has been
reported, however, on the influence of the knee-chest
References
position on pulmonary function under general anes-
thesia. There are a few studies”,” of pulmonary func-
1 Schofield NM: Anesthesia for spinal disorders. In Loach
tion in the prone position in anesthetized patients. A, ed. Anesthesia for Orthopaedic Patients. London: Ed-
Posner rt al.” studied the effect of the prone position, ward .4rnold, 1983:79-108.
with constant volume ventilation, on PaO, and re- 2 Spangfort EV: The lumbar disc herniation, a con-
ported that PaO, increased significantly when subjects purer-aided analysis of 2504 operations. Acta Orthop
were turned to the prone position. Stone and Stand 1972; 142(Suppl): l-95.
Khambatta” studied the influence of the prone po- 3 Tarlov IM: The knee-chest position for spinal oper:l-
sition on the intrapulmonary shunt (Qsp/Qt) in young, Lions. J BoneJoint Surg 1967;49A: 1193-4.
healthy, nonobese surgical patients and reported that 4 Anthonisen NR, Danson J, Robertson PC, Ross WRD:
the prone position did not alter the magnitude of the Airway closure as a function of age. Respir Physiol 1969-
70:8:58-65.
pulmonary shunt in their study population. Because
5 Laurin (:A, Migneault G, Brunet JL, Roy P: Knee-chest
the subjects of the latter study” were young and not
support for lumbosacral operations. Can / Szltg
obese, FRC was suspected to be greater than CC in 1969; 12:245-50.
both the supine and prone positions. This might ex- 6 Nunn JF: Elastic forces and lung volumes. In Nunn JF,
plain why the patients showed no change in Qsp/Qt ed. Applied respiratory physiology. 3d ed. Stoneham, MA:
when they were turned from the supine to the prone Butter-worth, 1987:23-45.
position. 7. Moreno F, Lyons HA: Effect of body posture on lung
In patients with respiratory failure, several aspects volumes. J Appl Physiol 1961; 16:27-g.
of pulmonary function were improved when patients 8. Rehder K, Marsh HM, Rodarte JR, Hyatt RE: Airway
were turned from the supine to the prone position. closure. Anesthesiology, 1977;47:40-52.
Piehl and Browni reported that in five patients who 9 Wiener CM, Kirk W, Albert RK: Prone position rc-
verses gravitational distribution of perfusion in dog lungs
had adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and
with oleic acid-induced injury. J AppZ Physiol 1990;
required mechanical ventilation with positive end-
68: 1386-92.
expiratory pressure (PEEP), mean PaO, increased 47 10. Kamal GD, Symreng ‘I’, .l‘atman DJ, Jebson PJR: Re-
? 16 mmHg after they were turned from the supine duced venous admixture in hemorrhagic hypovolemia:
to the prone position. They attributed this effect to maintenance of arterial oxygenation by selective pul-
improved upper airway toilet and counteraction of monary vascular collapse. Chit Care Med 1990;18:208-
the adverse ventilation-perfusion ratios of patients with 12.
ARDS. Douglas et al.” also reported an improvement 11. Posner A, Brody D, Ravin M: Effect of prone position
in PaO, in six patients with acute respiratory failure with constant volume ventilation on PaO, in man. Anesth
who were turned from the supine to the prone po- Analg 1965;44:435-9.
sition, with support of the upper thorax and pelvis. 12. Stone JG, Khambatta HJ: Pulmonary shunts in the prone
position. Anaesthesia 1978;33:512-7.
According to these reports, the prone position, in
13. Piehl MA, Brown RS: Use of extreme position changes
which abdominal free movements were maintained,
in acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med 197634:
has been beneficial or at least has had no detrimental 13-4.
effect on pulmonary oxygenation in artificially ven- 14. Douglas WW, Rehder K, Beynen FM, Sessler AD, Marsh
tilated patients. The knee-chest position is a prone HM: Improved oxygenation in patients with acute res-
position that allows free abdominal movement. Thus, piratory failure: the prone position. Am Rev Respir Di.c
even in patients under general anesthesia, this posi- 1977; 115:559-66.