Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region V

Sorsogon

The Contextualized SBM Assessment

Process and Tool (SBM APAT)

Name of School: TONGDOL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

School ID: 114156
School Address: Tongdol, Donsol, Sorsogon

Name of School Head: ROEL P. AVENDAÑO

Plantilla Position: Teacher-in-Charge

_____________________________________________
Date of Assessment Conducted

_____________________________________________
Date of District Validation
 Summary of Ratings
II. Validated Practices Using DOD (40%)

Cummulative Scores of
Validators per Principle
SBM Principles Weight Computation Results
Leadership and Governance 30% 1.71 0.51
Curriculum & Learning 30% 1.65 0.50
Accountability & Continuous
Improvement 25% 1.72 0.43
Management of Resources 15% 1.61 0.24
Sub-Total 100% 1.68

Numerical Rating Scale Description

0.50 - 1.40 Good
1.50 - 2.49 Better
2.50 - 3.00 Best

III. Computation for the Final Rating

Areas Weight Computation Results

Performance Improvement 60% 0.000
SBM Assessment Score (DOD) 40% 1.68 0.672
TOTAL 100% 0.672

Interpretation
___________ Developing (Level I)
___________ Maturing (Level II)
___________ Advanced (Level III)

Description of SBM Level of Practice

Numerical Rating Scale Description

0.50 - 1.40 Developing
1.50 - 2.49 Maturing
2.50 - 3.00 Advance

Prepared By:
ROEL P. AVENDAÑO
Name and Signature of School Head

Validated By:
CORAZON A. MONTILLA
OIC-PSDS

rextbarbinsdosorsogonsgod02072020
 SBM Level of Practice Validation Form
I. IMPROVEMENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES (60%)

A. ACCESS (45%)
School Year Enrollment Variance % of Increase Rating & Equivalent Points
2018 - 2019 117 Baseline
2019 - 2020 123 6 5.13 1 - Marginal at least 1% increase
2020 - 2021 126 3 2.44 2 - Average at least 7% increase
2021 - 2022 124 -2 -1.59 3 - High at least 10% increase
Average % of increase 1.99 1
Rating & Equivalent Points
B. EFFICIENCY (25%)
School Year Drop-Out Rate % of Decrease Rating & Equivalent Points
2018 - 2019 0 0.00 1 - Marginal at least 25% decrease
2019 - 2020 0 2 - Average at least 50% decrease
2020 - 2021 0 3 - High (0 drop-out rate)
Average % of Decrease 3
School Year Completion Rate Variance % of Increase Rating & Equivalent Points
2018 - 2019 97 22 29.33 1 - Marginal at least 5% increase
2019 - 2020 95 20 26.67 2 - Average at least 7% increase
2020 - 2021 99 24 32.00 3 - High at least 10% increase
Average % of increase 29.33 3
School Year Cohort-Survival Variance % of Increase Rating & Equivalent Points
Rate
2018 - 2019 85 10 13.33 1 - Marginal at least 5% increase
2019 - 2020 88 13 17.33 2 - Average at least 7% increase
2020 - 2021 86 11 14.67 3 - High at least 10% increase
Average % of increase 15.11 3
Average Efficiency Rating (DR + CR + CSR)/3 3.00

C. QUALITY (30%)
Average Final
School Year Sum (SY1+SY2+SY3) Rating & Equivalent Points
Rating
2018 - 2019 82.00 1 - Marginal (65% - 75%)
2019 - 2020 84.00 249.00 2 - Average (76% - 85%)
2020 - 2021 83.00 3 - High (86% - 100%)
Average 83.00 3

SUMMARY
CATEGORY WEIGHT Ave. Rating x Weight Numerical Rating Scale
ACCESS 45% 0.45 0.50 - 1.40 (Good)
EFFICIENCY 25% 0.75 1.50 - 2.49 (Better)
QUALITY 30% 0.90 2.50 - 3.00 (Best)
TOTAL 2.1 BETTER

Prepared By: ROEL P. AVENDAÑO, TIC ____________________

 Validated By: CORAZON A. MONTILLA ____________________
OIC-PSDS
rextbarbinsdosorsogonsgod02072020
 SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TOOL (SBM APAT)

Principle I - Leadership & Governance

Indicators Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total

1 3 6 1 10 2
1. In place is a development Plan 2 3 7 3
(e.g. SIP) developned
collaboratively by the 3 2 8 3
stakeholders of school and 4 2 9 3
community 5 1
Average 2.2 2.5 2 2.23
1 1 6 1 7 1
2. The Development Plan (e.g. 2 2
SIP) is regularly reviewed by the 3 2
school community to keep it
responsive and relevant to the 4 2
emerging needs, challenges and
opportunities 5 1
Average 1.4 1 1 1.13

1 3 3 2 4 1
3. The school is organized by a clear
structure and work arrangements that
promote shared leadership and
governance and define the roles and
responsibilties of the stakeholders 2 3 5 1
Average 3 2 1 2.00
1 2 4 3 6 3
4. A leadership network facilitates
communication between and among
school and community leaders for 2 1 5 1 7 2
informed decision-making and solving of
school community wide learning
problems 3 1
Average 1.33 2 2.5 1.94
1 1 6 1 8 1
2 3 7 1
5. A long-term program is in
operation that addresses the 3 1
training and development needs 4 2
of school and community leaders 5 2
Average 1.8 1 1 1.26
Summary of Computation for Principle 1 1.71 0.51

Evaluated By:

ROEL P. AVENDAÑO ___________________________

School Head

Validated By:

CORAZON A. MONTILLA ___________________________

OIC-PSDS
rextbarbinsdosorsogonsgod02072020
 SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TOOL (SBM APAT)

Principle II - Curriculum and Learning

Indicators Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total

1 3 7 2 12 3
2 3 8 1 13 1
1. The curriculum provides for 3 1 9 1 14 1
the devlopment needs of all 4 0 10 1 15 0
types learners in the school 5 1 11 1
community 6 3
Average 1.83 1.5 1.25 1.52
1 1 7 3 11 3
2 1 8 2 12 3
2. The implemented 3 1 9 3
curriculum is localized to make
it more meaningful to the 4 1 10 3
learners and applicable to life 5 1
and community 6 1
Average 1.00 2.5 3 2.16

3. A representative group of 1 3 4 2 7 2
school community
stakeholders develop the 2 1 5 2 8 0
methods and materials for
developing creative thinking
and problem solving 3 1 6 3
Average 1.66 2.33 1 1.66
1 3 6 3 8 3
4. The learning systems are regularly 2 3 7 3 9 0
and collaboratively monitored by the 3 3
community using appropriate tools to
ensure the holistic growth and 4 3
development of the learners and
community 5 0
Average 2.4 3 1.5 2.30
1 3 5 1 8 1
5. Appropriate assessment tools for 2 1 6 1
teaching and learning are continously
reviewed and improved and 3 3 7 1
assessment results are contextualized
to the learner and local situation and
the attainment of relevant life skills 4 1
Average 2 1.00 1 1.33

6. Learning managers and facilitators 1 3 4 3 7 3

(teachers, administrators and community
members) nurture values and
environment that are protective of all 2 3 5 0 8 0
children and demonstrate behaviors
consistent to the organization's vision,
mission and goals 3 3 6 0 9 0
Average 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.66
 1 2 4 1 6 0

2 1 5 2
7. Methods and resources are
learner and community- 3 1
friendly, enjoyable, safe,
inclusive, accessible and aimed
at developing self-directed
learners. Learners are equipped
with essential knowledge,
skills and values to assume
responsibility and
accountability for their own
learning
Average 1.33 1.50 0 0.94

Summary of Computation for Principle 2 1.65 0.50

Evaluated By:
ROEL P. AVENDAÑO
School Head ___________________________

Validated By:

CORAZON A. MONTILLA ___________________________

OIC-PSDS
rextbarbinsdosorsogonsgod02072020
Principle III - Accountability and Continuous Improvement

Indicators Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total

1. Roles and responsibilties of
accoiuntable person/s and collective 1 2 3 2 5 1
body/ies are clearly defined and
agreed upon by community
stakeholders 2 3 4 2 6 1
Average 2.5 2 1 1.83
2. Achievement of goals is 1 2 3 3 5 3
recognized based on a collaboratively
developed performance
accountability system; gaps are 2 2 4 3 6 3
addressed through appropriate action
7 3

Average 2 2 3.00 2.33

3. The accountability system is
owned by the community and is
1 2 4 2 5 3
continuously enhanced to ensure that
management structures and
mechanisms are responsive to the
emerging learning needs and 2 2
demands of the community (System
of Processes, Mechanisms and Tools
Accountability) ownership
3 2
Average 2.00 2 1 1.67
1 2 8 2 12 1
4. Accountability assessment 2 0 9 0 13 0
criteria and tools, feddback 3 0 10 0 14 0
mechanisms and information
collection and validation 4 0 11 3 15 0
techniques and processes are
5 0
inclusive and collaboratively
developed and agreed upon 6 0
Average 0.33 1.25 0.25 0.61

5. Participatory assessment of 1 3 3 0 7 3
performance is done regularly
with community assessments 2 3 4 0
results and lessons learned serve
as basis for feedback, technical 5 0
assistance, recognition and plan
adjustment 6 2
Average 3 0.5 3 2.17
rextbarbinsdosorsogonsgod02072020

Summary of Computation for Principle 3 1.72 0.43

Evaluated By:
ROEL P. AVENDAÑO
School Head ___________________________

Validated By:
CORAZON A. MONTILLA
SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TOOL (SBM APAT)

Principle IV - Management of Resources

Indicators Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total

1 1 6 1 7 1

1. Regular resource inventory is 2 2 8 1

collaboratively undertaken by 3 1
learning managers, learning
facilitators and community 4 2
stakeholders as basis for resource
allocation and mobilization 5
Average 1.5 1 1 1.16
2. A regular dialogue for planning and
resource programming, that is accessible 1 1 3 2 4 2
and inclusive, continuously engage
stakeholders and support implementation
of community education plans 2 1
Average 1 2 2 1.66
1 2 4 2 5 2
3. In place is a community-developed
resource management system that drives 2 2
appropriate behaviours of the
stakeholders to ensure judicious,
appropriate and effective use of resources 3 1
Average 1.66 2 1 1.55
1 2 4 2 7 1
4. Regular monitoring, evaluation and
reporting processes of resource 2 2 5 2 8 2
management are collaboratively
developed and implemented by the 3 3 6 2 9 2
learning facilitators and community
stakeholders 10 1
Average 2.33 2.00 1.5 1.94
1 1 4 1 6 2
5. There is a system that manage the
network and linkages which 2 3 5 2 7 2
strengthen and sustain partnerships
for improving resource management 3 1
Average 1.66 1.5 2 1.72
Summary of Computation for Principle 4 1.61 0.24

Evaluated By:
ROEL P. AVENDAÑO ___________________________
School Head

Validated By:
CORAZON A. MONTILLA ___________________________
OIC-PSDS
rextbarbinsdosorsogonsgod02072020
SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TOOL (SBM APAT)

Instruction to the Users:

Please indicate the numerical rating on the highlighted portion the extent of SBM
Practice per indicator listed below based on the consensual agreement of the
validating teams after the systematic D-O-D (Document-Analysis-Observation-
Discussion). On the other hand, indicators with no evidence just indicate zero

Rating Scale:
0 No evidence
Evidence indicates developing structures and mechanisms are
1 in place to demonstrate ACCESs
Evidence indicates developing structures and mechanisms are
2 fully implemented and aligned with ACCESs
Evidence indicates developing structures and procedure satisfy
3 quality standards

Illustrative Example

Entries for average of the three levels and total are auto-computed
SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TOOL (SBM APAT)

Instruction to the Users:

Please indicate the numerical rating which corresponds to the equivalent points of
the computed average % of increase/decrease. This will facilitate the automatic
computation of performance indicators per category and summary and in order to
determine the numerical rating scale. Kindly refer to the illustrative example below.

Numerical Rating Scale:

0.5 - 1.49 Good
1.50 - 2.49 Better
2.50 - 3.00 Best

Illustrative Example

Please indicate the numerical rating which corresponds to the equivalent points of the computed average
% of increse/decrease