HHS Public Access

Author manuscript
Hear Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2022 August 01.
Author Manuscript

Published in final edited form as:

Hear Res. 2021 August ; 407: 108292. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2021.108292.

Assessment of auditory and vestibular damage in a mouse

model after single and triple blast exposures
Beatrice Maoa,*, Ying Wangb,*, Tara Balasubramaniana, Rodrigo Uriosteb, Talah Wafac,
Tracy S. Fitzgeraldc, Scott J. Haraczya, Kamren Edwards-Hollingswortha, Zahra N. Sayyidd,
Donna Wilderb, Venkata Siva Sai Sujith Sajjab, Yanling Weib, Peethambaran Arunb, Irene
Gistb, Alan G. Chengd, Joseph B. Longb,*, Matthew W. Kelleya,*
Author Manuscript

aSection
on Developmental Neuroscience, National Institute on Deafness and Other
Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
bBlast-InducedNeurotrauma Branch, Center for Military Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Walter
Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA
cMouse Auditory Testing Core Facility, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication
Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
dDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine,
Stanford, CA, USA

Abstract
The use of explosive devices in war and terrorism has increased exposure to concussive blasts
Author Manuscript

among both military personnel and civilians, which can cause permanent hearing and balance
deficits that adversely affect survivors’ quality of life. Significant knowledge gaps on the

*
co-corresponding authors; beatrice.mao@nih.gov, ying.wang5.ctr@mail.mil, joseph.b.long.civ@mail.mil.
CRediT Author contributions
BM– Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Writing – Original Draft,
Writing – Review & Editing, Visualization, Project administration
YWang – Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Investigation, Data curation, Writing – Review & Editing, Supervision, Project
administration, Funding acquisition
TB – Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Visualization
RU – Investigation, Data curation, Writing – Review & Editing
TW – Methodology, Investigation, Data curation
TSF – Methodology, Formal analysis, Resources, Writing – Review & Editing
SJH – Investigation, Data curation
Author Manuscript

KEH – Investigation, Data curation

ZNS – Investigation, Data curation
DW – Investigation, Data curation
SV – Investigation, Data curation
YWei – Investigation, Data curation
IG – Project administration
AGC – Resources, Writing – Review & Editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition
JBL - Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition
MWK – Conceptualization, Resources, Writing – Review & Editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our
customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of
the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered
which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
 Mao et al. Page 2

underlying etiology of blast-induced hearing loss and balance disorders remain, especially with
Author Manuscript

regard to the effect of blast exposure on the vestibular system, the impact of multiple blast
exposures, and long-term recovery. To address this, we investigated the effects of blast exposure
on the inner ear using a mouse model in conjunction with a high-fidelity blast simulator.
Anesthetized animals were subjected to single or triple blast exposures, and physiological
measurements and tissue were collected over the course of recovery for up to 180 days. Auditory
brainstem responses (ABRs) indicated significantly elevated thresholds across multiple
frequencies. Limited recovery was observed at low frequencies in single-blasted mice. Distortion
product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were initially absent in all blast-exposed mice, but low-
amplitude DPOAEs could be detected at low frequencies in some single-blast mice by 30 days
post-blast, and in some triple-blast mice at 180 days post-blast. All blast-exposed mice showed
signs of tympanic membrane (TM) rupture immediately following exposure and loss of outer hair
cells (OHCs) in the basal cochlear turn. In contrast, the number of inner hair cells (IHCs) and
Author Manuscript

spiral ganglion neurons was unchanged following blast-exposure. A significant reduction in IHC
pre-synaptic puncta was observed in the upper turns of blast-exposed cochleae. Finally, we found
no significant loss of utricular hair cells or changes in vestibular function as assessed by vestibular
evoked potentials. Our results suggest that (1) blast exposure can cause severe, long-term hearing
loss which may be partially due to slow TM healing or altered mechanical properties of healed
TMs, (2) traumatic levels of sound can still reach the inner ear and cause basal OHC loss despite
middle ear dysfunction caused by TM rupture, (3) blast exposure may result in synaptopathy in
humans, and (4) balance deficits after blast exposure may be primarily due to traumatic brain
injury, rather than damage to the peripheral vestibular system.

Graphical Abstract
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript

Hear Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2022 August 01.

 Mao et al. Page 3
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript

Keywords
Author Manuscript

Blast exposure; hearing loss; synaptopathy; tympanic membrane; outer hair cells; vestibular
evoked potentials

1. Introduction
The use of explosive weapons, particularly improvised explosive devices (IEDs), has
become a hallmark of recent global military conflicts including the wars in Afghanistan and
Iraq. Approximately half of all U.S. casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan were attributed to
IEDs (Mann and Fischer, 2019), and explosives caused nearly 80% of injuries sustained in
these conflicts (Owens et al., 2008). The high energy content of blast waves can cause
lifelong health problems for veterans, including traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Author Manuscript

Veterans with blast-related TBI consistently report auditory and vestibular deficits (Lew,
2007; Scherer et al., 2007). Additionally, some blast-exposed veterans with clinically normal
hearing—as measured by traditional audiograms—nevertheless report difficulty hearing in
noisy environments and perform poorly on performance-based auditory processing tests
(Saunders et al., 2015). These results suggest the possibility of cochlear synaptopathy, also
called hidden hearing loss, which may reduce the listener’s ability to hear signals in noise
(Kujawa and Liberman 2009; Kujawa and Liberman 2015), as well as possible damage to

Hear Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2022 August 01.

 Mao et al. Page 4

the central auditory system (Saunders et al., 2015). These complications are potentially
Author Manuscript

disabling to blast-exposed veterans, hindering societal re-integration and quality of life.

Despite the prevalence of these injuries among soldiers, relatively little is known about the
underlying etiology of blast-induced hearing or balance dysfunction. While several groups
have used animal models to examine the effect of blast exposure on the inner ear, these
studies largely focused on changes to the auditory system alone, and most examined the
effect of only a single blast exposure over the course of several weeks. Because military
personnel may face multiple blast exposures in the course of training and combat, we sought
to characterize the effect of both single and triple blast exposures on the inner ear using a
simulator which was specifically engineered to produce highly repeatable blast waves in the
range of what an IED produces upon detonation (Varas et al., 2011). Additionally, we
examined cochlear and vestibular function and histology over an extended recovery period
of up to six months, to investigate the long-term effects of blast exposure on the inner ear.
Author Manuscript

2. Materials and Methods

2.1 Animals and blast exposures
All animal experiments were conducted under Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
approved protocols at Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR), the National
Institutes of Health (NIH), and Stanford University School of Medicine, in accordance with
the Animal Welfare Act and other federal statutes and regulations relating to animals and
experiments involving animals, and adhered to principles stated in the Leader for the Care
and Use of Laboratory Animals. All blast exposures were performed at WRAIR in Silver
Spring, MD. Adult (8–10 week old) male CBA mice were randomly assigned to sham
control, noise control, single blast, or triple blast treatment groups. Animals were
Author Manuscript

anesthetized with 4% isoflurane gas in an induction chamber, then placed inside the blast
simulator in a prone position facing the direction of the oncoming blast wave. The blast
simulator consisted of a 0.5 ft long compression chamber connected to a 21 ft long
expansion section that extends 3.6 ft into the end wave eliminator, which eliminates
secondary shock wave. The blast overpressure was generated by rupture of a 0.34 in thick
VALMEX® (Mehler Texnologies) membrane between the two sections of the blast
simulator. The compression chamber was rapidly pressurized until the membrane ruptured,
yielding a shockwave with a peak static pressure of 16 psi with approximately 4 msec
positive phase duration and an impulse of ~24 psi*ms. Frequency of the Friedlander-like
waveform (positive and negative pressure) is approximately 81 Hz and power spectrum
analysis of the wave showed that the impulse is most intense (peak amplitude) at
approximately 43Hz (Sajja et al., 2018; Heyburn et al., 2019; Arun et al., 2020; Wang et al.,
Author Manuscript

2020).

Sham control and noise control animals were anesthetized and handled in the same way as
blast-exposed animals. Those in the noise control group were positioned at the same
distance from the sound source as blast-exposed animals, but in cages outside the blast
simulator, where they were exposed to the sound of the blast but not the shock wave directly.
Sham control animals were held in cages in another room entirely. The ABR thresholds of
sham control and noise control animals were found to be similar (Suppl. Fig. 1). Therefore,

Hear Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2022 August 01.

 Mao et al. Page 5

in subsequent analyses, they were combined into a single control group, and are referred to
Author Manuscript

as “control” condition animals for the remainder of this study. Blast-exposed animals
received an initial 8 minutes of 4% isoflurane in an anesthesia chamber. They were the
transferred into the simulator for blast overpressure exposures, and triple-blast animals were
removed and given additional 4% isoflurane for 2 minutes between exposures. Testing for
righting reflex time in control and blast-exposed animals indicated that animals remained
anesthetized during blast exposures (Table 1). All animals were then maintained for the
indicated recovery periods prior to data collection. Whenever possible, physiological data
were taken from the same individuals at different time points, to reduce the total number of
animals used. The types of data collected and the recovery time points assessed are
summarized in Table 2.

2.2 Measures of hearing and balance function, and otoscopy

Author Manuscript

Auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds and the presence or absence of distortion
product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were assessed as described in an earlier study
(Morozko et al., 2015). Briefly, for ABR measurements, animals were anesthetized with
intraperitoneal injections of ketamine (60 mg/kg) and dexdomitor (0.4 mg/kg), and
subdermal electrodes were placed in the scalp between the ears and below the pinna of each
ear. Blackman-gated tone-burst stimuli (Blackman gated) of 3 ms with a rise/fall time of
0.75 ms were presented to each ear at 8, 16, 32, and 40 kHz pure tones using hardware (RZ6
Multi I/O processor, MF-1 speakers) and software (BioSigRz, v. 5.1) from Tucker-Davis
Technologies (Alachua, FL, USA). The contralateral ear was used as reference. Thresholds
were subjectively assessed by visual inspection of waveforms. For data analysis purposes, if
ABRs could not be observed at 90 dB SPL, they were coded as 100 dB SPL. For DPOAEs,
two tones at f1=65 dB SPL and f2=55 dB SPL were presented to the ear using two MF-1
Author Manuscript

speakers (as above). The f2 frequency ranged from 4–40 kHz and f2/f1=1.25. The distortion
products were recorded using an ER-10B+ microphone (Etymotic, Elk Grove Village, IL).
DPOAEs with levels of −5 dB SPL or above were considered present. Some animals were
assessed both before blast exposure (baseline), and after set recovery periods ranging from 1
day to 180 days. While most of the physiological data were measured at WRAIR (including
all of the long-term data obtained at 90 and 180 days post-exposure), one cohort of mice was
evaluated for otoscopy, vestibular evoked potentials, and DPOAE measurements at NIH for
time points between 1 and 30 days. For data analysis, the ABR thresholds of the most
sensitive ear at baseline or the earliest time point available were used. If data for the chosen
ear was missing at a later time point, data from the other ear was substituted. Each animal
was represented only once at each time point to avoid pseudoreplication.

Vestibular evoked potentials (VsEPs) were obtained following the protocol described in a
Author Manuscript

previous study (Tona et al., 2019). Briefly, mice were anesthetized in the same manner as
described above. Subdermal electrodes were placed in the scalp along the nuchal crest,
below the pinna of one ear, and the right hip (ground). Mice were laid supine on a platform
and their heads were secured inside a plastic clip coupled to a mechanical shaker (Labworks
Inc., Costa Mesa, CA). Shaker movements (1 g/msec rectangular jerk pulses of 2 msec
duration, delivered at 17 Hz) were driven by an RMX850 power amplifier (QSC, Costa
Mesa, CA). VsEPs were measured from animals at 1 day, 3 days, 14 days, and 1 month after

Hear Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2022 August 01.

 Mao et al. Page 6

blast treatment. Thresholds were determined by visual inspection of waveforms, and wave
Author Manuscript

P1 peak-to-peak amplitudes and latencies were measured in the BioSigRz software.

Otoscopic inspection of tympanic membranes (TMs) was performed using a Sony MCC-500
HD camera attached to a Zeiss Opti Pico S100 surgical microscope prior to tissue collection.

2.3 Immunofluorescence and plastic sectioning

Prior to tissue collection, animals were deeply anesthetized with 4% isoflurane and perfused
transcardially with 4% paraformaldehyde or a mixture of 3% glutaraldehyde and 2%
paraformaldehyde. Otic capsules were removed from the temporal bones and incubated in
0.25M-0.5M EDTA for 2–7 days to decalcify the bony labyrinth.

When preparing whole-mounts, the cochlea was divided into the apical, middle, and basal
turns. Each turn was then trimmed of lateral wall and decalcified bone, and the Reissner’s
and tectorial membranes were removed with #55 forceps (Fine Science Tools). The dissected
Author Manuscript

cochlea and utricle were placed in blocking solution containing 0.1% Triton-X, donkey anti-
mouse fab fragments at 1:200 (catalog #715-007-003, Jackson Immunoresearch Lab), and
normal donkey serum at 1:200 in 1X PBS, and then incubated in different combinations of
primary antibodies overnight (rabbit anti-MYO7A catalog #25-6790 from Proteus
Biosciences, Inc. at 1:2000, Mouse anti-Pou4f3 catalog #sc-81980 from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc. at 1:200, goat anti-Sox2 catalog #AF2018 from R&D Systems at 1:200,
mouse anti-CTBP2 catalog #612044 from BD Transduction Laboratories at 1:500). All
immunostaining steps were carried out at 4°C. The following day, samples were washed
three times with 0.1% Tween in PBS, and secondary antibodies conjugated to fluorophores
(1:1000, Invitrogen Alexa Fluor) were applied for 1–2 hours at room temperature. After
three more washes, the samples were mounted in Vectashield (catalog #H-1000-10, Vector
Laboratories) or Fluoromount-G (catalog #00-4958-02, Invitrogen) and imaged using a
Author Manuscript

Zeiss 710 confocal microscope. Image analysis was performed using Zen Black software.

For cochleae, the number of IHCs and OHCs were counted in 200 μm stretches in the
regions corresponding to the frequency ranges 7–10 kHz, 20–28 kHz, and 48–60 kHz
(hereafter referred to as the apex, middle, and basal turns). Areas that were damaged during
dissection, and areas with 4 rows of OHCs, were avoided. For synaptic ribbon counts,
rectangular regions were drawn around 15 IHC nuclei per turn, and the number of pre-
synaptic puncta was quantified by stepping through the Z-stack of a 40x or 63x confocal
image. Total puncta per IHC were then averaged within each turn. For the utricle, the
number of hair cells in five 50 μm × 50 μm areas were counted and averaged (Figure 7B).

For plastic sectioning, EDTA-decalcified specimens were serially dehydrated in ethanol,

Author Manuscript

then embedded using the JB-4 Embedding Kit (catalog #0226A-800, Polysciences, Inc.).
Sections of 4–8 micron thickness were cut on a rotary microtome (Leica RM2265), stained
with thionin, mounted with Permount (catalog #SP15-100, Fisher Chemical), and imaged on
a Leica microscope (DM5000 B). Spiral ganglion neurons were counted in only mid-
modiolar sections.

Hear Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2022 August 01.

 Mao et al. Page 7

2.4 Statistics and data analysis

Author Manuscript

For each type of data gathered across multiple time points and conditions, outliers (defined
using a criterion of three times the interquartile range for each time point and condition)
were removed prior to statistical analysis, and each animal was represented in each data set
only once to avoid pseudoreplication. For all statistics, a two-way ANOVA with interaction
effect was performed using RStudio (version 1.2.5001, RStudio, Inc.), with blast condition
and recovery time point as main effects. For ABRs, thresholds were split by test frequency
prior to analysis. For cochlear histology, data were split by cochlear turn. In all multiple
comparison tests, p-values were adjusted using the false discovery rate (FDR) method. If a
main effect was significant at the p ≤ 0.05 level, post-hoc Tukey tests were performed to
identify which pairwise contrast(s) contributed to the significant main effect. If the
interaction effect between condition and time point was significant at the p ≤ 0.05 level,
simple effects tests were performed. This required splitting the data by one main effect, to
Author Manuscript

examine the effect of the other main effect. In this manner, data could be compared across
conditions at a single time point, or across time points within a blast condition. P-values
returned by RStudio as “<2E-16” (the lowest possible value that R could report with
precision) were entered as 2E-16 prior to any necessary multiple corrections adjustments.
Any tests with p-values greater than 0.05 were considered non-significant.

3. Results
3.1 Blast exposure causes long-term hearing loss, with limited recovery at low
frequencies
Baseline mean ABR thresholds were between 20–35 dB SPL for all frequencies tested. One
day after blast exposure, single- and triple-blasted mice exhibited average threshold shifts of
Author Manuscript

~50–65 dB SPL across all frequencies (Fig. 1a). Most single-blasted mice had no ABR
response at the maximum stimulus level of 90 dB SPL at 32 kHz and 40 kHz, but responses
were measurable at high levels at 8 kHz and 16 kHz (mean thresholds of ~76 and ~82 dB
SPL, respectively). Triple-blasted mice exhibited average thresholds in excess of 90 dB SPL
across all frequencies. The effects of condition, time point, and their interaction on ABR
thresholds at each frequency were significant (Table 4). When post-hoc tests were performed
on the effect of condition within each time point, post-blast ABR thresholds were found to
be significantly different from controls at all time points and frequencies. The only
exception was the 8 kHz thresholds of single-blast animals, which showed a recovery to
control values after 180 days. At early time points (1 day and 7 days post-exposure),
thresholds of single- and triple-blasted mice did not significantly differ from each other at
any frequency, but significant differences between blast conditions did emerge at or after 30
Author Manuscript

days post-exposure at 8 kHz, 16 kHz, and 32 kHz. In each case, single-blast animals showed
a significant recovery of threshold relative to triple-blast. ABR thresholds at 40 kHz did not
differ significantly between single- and triple-blast animals at any time point (Fig. 1a; Table
5).

When post-hoc tests were performed on the effect of time point within a condition, single-
blasted animals exhibited significant recovery of thresholds between 1 day and 30 days post-
blast at 8 kHz (p=0.02) and between 1 day and later time points at 16 kHz (p=5.94E-03 for 1

Hear Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2022 August 01.

 Mao et al. Page 8

vs. 30 days; p=0.03 for 1 vs. 90 days; p=2.4E-03 for 1 vs. 180 days; Figure 1A, Table 6).
Author Manuscript

However, there was no additional significant recovery between 30 days and any later time
point. Despite modest reductions over time, the ABR thresholds of single-blast mice at 32
kHz and 40 kHz did not exhibit statistically significant recovery after exposure. Triple-
blasted animals showed no significant recovery in threshold at any time point or frequency,
except at 8 kHz between 30 days and 1 day post-exposure (p=0.01; Table 6). At 32 kHz and
40 kHz, the thresholds of triple-blasted mice were essentially stable (±5 dB SPL) between 1
day and 180 days after blast. Finally, the only cases of complete recovery, defined as ABR
thresholds no longer significantly different from baseline, were observed for single-blast
exposure at 8 kHz after 90 and 180 days (Table 6).

3.2 Blast exposure abolishes distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs)

To examine outer hair cell function, DPOAEs were recorded from control, single- and triple-
Author Manuscript

blast-exposed mice. DPOAEs were absent at all frequencies in both single- and triple-blasted
mice at 1 day and 7 days post blast (Fig. 1b). Small DPOAEs were recorded from some
single-blast animals as early as 30 days post-exposure, and more animals showed DPOAE
recovery over time. By 180 days post-exposure, low level DPOAEs were detectable in 67%
(4 of 6) single blast mice. In contrast, no DPOAEs were detected in triple-blast mice prior to
180 days, and at that time point only 1 of 4 triple-blasted mice had detectable DPOAEs (Fig.
1b).

3.3 Tympanic membranes are damaged by blast exposure

To assess the possible damaging effects of blast exposure on the tympanic membrane (TM),
we performed otoscopy on control and experimental mice (Fig. 2). TMs of both single and
triple blast-exposed mice showed signs of damage at all time points examined (1 day, 3 days,
Author Manuscript

14 days, and 30 days post-exposure). TM injury was particularly pronounced one and three
days after blast with 100% of blast-exposed ears having perforated TMs at these time points.
By one month, TMs appeared to have healed in all blast-exposed ears, although scarring was
always present (Fig. 2). TM damage and healing did not differ in any obvious way between
single and triple blasted mice.

3.4 Variable outer hair cell loss following blast exposure

To determine whether blast exposure causes cochlear hair cell loss, the number of hair cells
was assessed in different regions of the cochlea at specific recovery time points. Hair cells
were labeled with anti-MYO7A and counterstained with phalloidin. Control cochleae
retained a normal complement of both inner hair cells (IHCs) and outer hair cells (OHCs) at
all time points (Fig. 3a). Similarly, IHCs appeared normal in cochleae from single- and
Author Manuscript

triple-blast mice at all time points and in all cochlear regions. In contrast, OHC loss was
evident in the basal and middle turns of triple-blast mice (Figure 3b), which had
significantly fewer OHCs than those of control or single-blast mice (Table 7).

OHC loss of >50% was observed in triple-blasted mice as early as one day post-exposure,
and this loss was maintained at all subsequent time points (Fig. 3b, c). When compared
within time points, significant differences in OHC loss were found between basal OHCs of
triple-blast and control, and triple-blast and single-blast, mice at every time point (Table 8).

Hear Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2022 August 01.

 Mao et al. Page 9

Additionally, basal OHCs differed significantly between single-blast and control mice at a
Author Manuscript

subset of time points. At the 7-day time point, middle turn OHCs of triple-blast and control
mice differed significantly, as did apical OHCs between triple- and single-blast animals.
However, no significant differences in apical or middle turn OHCs were found at any other
time points, or among IHCs in any cochlear region (Table 8).

3.5 Blast-exposure does not lead to changes in the number of spiral ganglion neurons,
but IHC synaptic ribbons are lost in the upper turns of blast-exposed mice
Although ABR data indicated significant and permanent threshold shifts in blast-exposed
animals relative to control animals across all frequencies (Fig. 1a; Table 5), the numbers of
IHCs were unchanged across time points in all regions of both single- and triple-blast ears.
To determine whether some aspects of the changes in ABR at mid- to low frequencies might
be a result of loss of spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs), the number of SGN cell bodies were
Author Manuscript

counted in each cochlear turn of mid-modiolar cross sections of control and triple blast-
exposed animals at the 30-day time point (Fig. 4a). Results indicated no significant
difference in the total number of SGN cell bodies between control and triple blast-exposed
samples (Fig. 4b, Table 12), nor in the density of cell bodies per unit area (Fig. 4c).

Next, we assessed whether pre-synaptic components of IHC synapses were affected

following blast exposure by labeling pre-synaptic ribbons with anti-CTBP2 antibodies (Fig.
5a). Average numbers of pre-synaptic puncta per hair cell were then determined for cells
located in basal, middle and apical turns. Two-way ANOVAs testing the effect of condition,
time point, and their interaction effect revealed that the number of pre-synaptic puncta was
significantly decreased for IHCs in the middle cochlear region for both single- and triple-
blasted mice and in the apical region for triple-blasted mice (Fig. 5b; Table 9).
Author Manuscript

3.6 Blast-exposure does not induce changes in vestibular function or number of utricular
hair cells
Blast-treated mice did not exhibit obvious behavioral signs of vestibular dysfunction, such as
circling or head-bobbing, at any time after exposure. Consistent with this result, vestibular
evoked potentials indicated no statistically significant differences in P1 wave amplitude,
latency, or threshold across time points or conditions (Fig. 6; Table 10).

To determine whether blast-exposure leads to vestibular hair cell loss, utricles were
dissected, fixed and immunolabeled. The utricles of blast-exposed mice appeared
superficially similar to those of control animals (Fig. 7a, b), with no apparent loss of hair
cells. This observation was confirmed quantitatively: the average number of hair cells per
unit area did not differ significantly among conditions or time points (Fig. 7c, Table 11).
Author Manuscript

4. Discussion
4.1 Damage to the TM causes acute auditory dysfunction following blast exposure, but
TM healing partially restores low-frequency hearing
Consistent with previous studies (Ewert et al., 2012; Cho et al., 2013), we observed
significant ABR threshold shifts across all frequencies one day after blast exposure (Fig. 1a).

Hear Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2022 August 01.

 Mao et al. Page 10

Because TM rupture (Fig. 2) and high thresholds (Fig. 1) were observed in all blast-exposed
Author Manuscript

animals, despite no or minimal loss of cochlear hair cells in the lower turns (Fig. 3), TM
damage was likely a major contributor to the initial hearing loss we observed. Several lines
of evidence suggest that spontaneous TM healing accounted for most of the recovery in
auditory function observed post-blast exposure. Consistent with previous reports of poor
high-frequency recovery after large TM perforations in gerbils (Cai et al., 2019; Dong et al.,
2019), only at 8 kHz did ABR thresholds of single blast-exposed mice recover to baseline
levels (Fig. 1), and all DPOAEs recorded from blast-exposed mice were restricted to
frequencies below 16 kHz (data not shown). Additionally, full ABR threshold recovery
occurred only after the 30 day time point (Fig. 1a), at which time TM healing appeared
mostly complete (Fig. 2). Because DPOAEs require successful transmission of sound across
the middle ear space twice, they are more affected by conductive dysfunction than ABRs
(Qin et al., 2010). Future work in which DPOAEs are measured after blast exposures should
Author Manuscript

take care to avoid, or account for, TM perforation or scarring, because DPOAEs are not a
reliable indicator of OHC function or survival if the middle ear is compromised (Dong et al.,
2019). The use of bone-conduction audiometry would provide a way for future blast studies
to assess damage to the inner ear independent of middle ear dysfunction.

In a previous study, micro-computed tomography scans performed on mice exposed to 181

kPa blasts revealed no evidence of ossicular dislocation or fluid buildup in the middle ear
space, suggesting that TM injury may be the main contributor to middle ear dysfunction
after blast exposure. Additionally, three months after exposure, healed TMs were ~3 times
thicker, and had ~3 times higher peak density, than control TMs (Cho et al., 2013). This
indicates that even after TM perforations have fully closed, TM function may not fully
recover after highly traumatic injuries such as blast exposure. Indeed, that we observe
permanent ABR threshold shifts, even at frequencies corresponding to areas that exhibited
Author Manuscript

no hair cell loss, suggests that the component of blast-induced hearing loss caused by TM
damage can be significant and long-lasting. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that
hair cell dysfunction, independent of HC death, may also contribute to the ABR threshold
shifts that were observed. Further work is needed to elucidate the impact of thicker TMs on
the efficiency of sound transfer at different frequencies. Additionally, replacing damaged or
healed TMs with material that recapitulates normal TM properties may allow future studies
to evaluate the separate contributions of sensorineural and conductive dysfunction to blast-
induced hearing loss.

Our data on the time course of hearing recovery suggests that multiple blasts may cause
greater TM damage and/or slower healing than single blasts. We began to detect DPOAEs in
the ears of some single-blast animals after 30 days, while triple-blast mice did not have
Author Manuscript

detectable DPOAEs until 180 days (Fig. 1b). Furthermore, relative to one day post-exposure,
the ABR thresholds of single-blast mice were significantly reduced at both 8 kHz and 16
kHz by the 30-day time point, while those of triple-blast mice were significantly reduced
only at 8 kHz over the same period (Table 6). While TMs appeared largely intact by 30 days
after exposure in both single and triple blast mice (Fig. 2), our otoscopic photos were not of
sufficiently high resolution to perform detailed quantitative analysis of TM healing. A recent
study found that perforations of 50% or larger by area resulted in no detectable DPOAEs,
and that perforations larger than 25% disproportionately affected high frequencies (Dong et

Hear Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2022 August 01.

 Mao et al. Page 11

al., 2019). Additionally, Cho et al. (2013) performed detailed analyses of TM perforation
Author Manuscript

size and healing in mice after single blast exposures, and found that fewer than 50% of TMs
were completely healed after three months of recovery time. Together with these studies, our
data on hearing recovery suggest that single-blast mice sustained TM perforations that
healed more quickly than those of triple-blast mice. It is also possible that the TMs of mice
exposed to triple blasts were thicker and denser after healing than those of single-blast mice,
but further studies employing micro-CT scans, as in Cho et al. (2013), are needed to evaluate
differences in TM healing between animals exposed to single and multiple blast exposures.

4.2 Loss of OHCs contributes to long-term hearing loss at high frequencies, and may
continue due to secondary effects long after blast exposure
Consistent with other studies, we found that OHCs were more susceptible to blast-induced
cell death than IHCs (Ewert et al., 2012; Cho et al., 2013; Kim et al., 2018). This was not
Author Manuscript

surprising, as OHCs are intrinsically more sensitive to damage, particularly those in the
basal turn (Sha et al., 2001). However, the specific contribution of this extensive loss of
basal OHCs to higher ABR thresholds and reduced DPOAEs could not be assessed in this
study due to the aforementioned TM rupture and subsequent likely scarring and thickening,
which would affect both measures of hearing function.

Previous studies which employed multiple blasts at pressures low enough to leave TMs
intact have reported that OHC loss occurred across the cochlea—not just at the basal end—
and that increasing numbers of blast exposures led to greater OHC loss (Ewert et al., 2012;
Hickman et al., 2018). In the current study, and a previous one (Cho et al., 2013), all blast-
exposed mice had ruptured TMs and sustained OHC loss primarily in the basal turn. This
suggests that blast-induced TM rupture reduces the transfer of blast pressure to the inner ear,
such that most damage to OHCs is confined to the basal turn immediately adjacent to the
Author Manuscript

oval and round windows. Nevertheless, we did observe greater loss of OHCs in triple-blast
mice than in single-blast mice, suggesting significant energy transfer to the cochlea even
after TM rupture. Because damaging levels of sound were conducted to the inner ear
presumably by other routes, such as bone conduction, our data suggest that in-ear hearing
protection may not be sufficient to protect workers or soldiers exposed to high amplitude
impulse sounds.

Finally, while significant HC loss was not observed in the mid- or apical- turns, we cannot
rule out the possibility that sublethal injury to HCs may also have contributed to the loss of
hearing function. Unfortunately, methods for assessing defects in HC function are limited
and were not performed in this study.
Author Manuscript

4.3 Peripheral neuropathy is not a likely major contributor to hearing loss in our blast
model
To determine whether a neural mechanism might also contribute to blast-induced hearing
loss, we examined the number of SGNs and IHC pre-synaptic structures in control and blast-
treated animals. We did not find changes in the number or density of SGN cell bodies at 30
days post-exposure (Fig. 4b), consistent with reports of SGN death occurring over an
extended period following injury to IHCs or cochlear nerve fibers after noise exposure

Hear Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2022 August 01.

 Mao et al. Page 12

(Spoendlin, 1975; Liberman and Kiang, 1978; Kujawa and Liberman, 2006; Fernandez et
Author Manuscript

al., 2015). It is possible that some SGN loss may occur at later time points, but the results
clearly indicate that the hearing loss present in both single and triple-blasted mice at 30 days
of recovery is not a result of decreased SGNs. A previous study did report significant loss of
SGNs just 7 days after blast exposure (Cho et al., 2013), possibly due to stronger blast
exposures (181 pKa/26.25 psi, compared to the 110 kPa/16 psi blasts used in this study).

A significant loss of pre-synaptic CTBP2 puncta was observed in the upper turns of single-
and triple blast-exposed mice (Fig. 5b), a result that is consistent with previous studies (Cho
et al., 2013; Kim et al., 2018). Given that OHC loss was limited to the basal turn, it is
surprising that IHC synaptic ribbon loss was variable in this region. It is possible that loss of
OHCs and, presumably, IHC stimulation, is actually protective for IHC synaptic ribbons.
Notably, pure-tone audiometry is largely insensitive to neural damage. Normal thresholds
have been measured in cats and humans even after removal of significant portions of the
Author Manuscript

auditory nerve (Dandy, 1934; Neff, 1947; Schuknecht and Woellner, 1955; Mikaelian and
Warfield, 1970), and only small changes in audiometry were observed in chinchillas that had
lost ~80% of their IHCs due to carboplatin treatment (Lobarinas et al., 2013). Therefore,
blast-induced synaptopathy is unlikely to be a significant factor in the elevated ABR
thresholds reported here. However, the results also suggest that synaptopathy could be a
long-term concern for some individuals exposed to blasts.

A limitation of the current work is that we did not evaluate the contribution of blast-induced
TBI or neuropathy in the auditory CNS to the hearing loss we observed. Previous work in
rats has shown that blast exposure damages the central auditory system (Mao et al., 2012;
Sosa et al., 2013; Kallakuri et al., 2018), reduces the sensitivity and spontaneous discharge
rates of vestibular afferents (Yu et al., 2020), and can even alter the tonotopic organization of
Author Manuscript

the auditory cortex (Masri et al., 2018). Additional studies are needed to evaluate the relative
contributions of peripheral and central damage to auditory and vestibular deficits caused by
blast exposure.

4.4 Vestibular function was not affected by blast exposures

We observed no overt behavioral changes such as spinning, head bobbing, or hyperactivity,
that would indicate vestibular dysfunction following blast exposure, consistent with other
studies. Additionally, the VsEP measurements of blast-exposed mice did not significantly
differ from those of control mice. We did observe that some blast-exposed animals had
higher VsEP thresholds and lower P1 amplitudes than controls (Fig. 6). Similar VsEP results
have reported in mouse mutants with otoconial abnormalities, even in heterozygous animals
(Jones et al., 2004). This raises the interesting possibility, which has not previously been
Author Manuscript

examined to our knowledge, that blast exposure might displace the otoconia of the vestibular
organs. Otoconial displacement frequently occurs after head injuries in humans, resulting in
benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, and has been documented in multiple studies of blast-
exposed veterans (Fausti et al., 2009; Akin et al., 2017). Mouse mutants with otoconial
abnormalities perform poorly on VOR and behavioral vestibular tests (Harrod and Baker,
2003; Jones et al., 2004; Dror et al., 2020). Future blast studies would benefit from

Hear Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2022 August 01.

 Mao et al. Page 13

examining otoconial displacement to account for its possible role in measures of vestibular
Author Manuscript

function.

Several groups have reported vestibulomotor deficits in blast-exposed rodents using rotarod
or righting reflex tests. These tests require behavioral responses that involve other sensory
systems, like vision and proprioception, and depend on motor function. Performance deficits
in these tasks therefore cannot be ascribed specifically to vestibular dysfunction, and
measurements made after the acute-recovery period may be confounded by habituation or
central compensation (Lien and Dickman, 2018; Studlack et al., 2018; Arun et al., 2020).
Strikingly, Jones and colleagues reported that some mutant mice with no detectable VsEPs
nevertheless performed adequately on a swimming test, and suggested that behavioral tests
alone may not reliably indicate vestibular deficits (Jones et al., 2004). We employed VsEPs
to avoid these complications, as they directly measure evoked responses following
stimulation of utricular HCs.
Author Manuscript

Consistent with our functional results, no significant difference in utricular HC density was
observed between blast-exposed and control animals at any time point (Fig. 7c). Other
studies have reported loss of utricular stereocilia bundles following blast exposure (Lien and
Dickman, 2018; Yu et al., 2020), and while we did not specifically examine damage to
stereocilia bundles, we routinely labeled specimens with phalloidin and saw no obvious
stereocilia loss in the utricles of blast-exposed animals (Fig. 7d). Blast-induced otoconial
displacement, as mentioned above, could provide a mechanistic explanation for vestibular
bundle damage.

One final consideration is that, unlike the cochlea, the mature utricle possesses a limited
capacity to regenerate HCs by transdifferentiation of supporting cells (SCs), although these
Author Manuscript

HCs are morphologically and physiologically immature (Lin et al., 2011; Bucks et al., 2017;
Sayyid et al., 2019). Therefore, it is possible that blast-exposure could have induced a mild
loss of hair cells that were subsequently replaced through regeneration. To address this
hypothesis, future studies examining the effect of blast exposure on the vestibular periphery
could consider using a transgenic mouse line in which SCs are labeled prior to exposure, so
that transdifferentiated SCs could be distinguished from endogenous HCs.

5. Conclusion
Overall, our results demonstrate that blast exposure causes long-term hearing loss with both
sensorineural and conductive components. Unfortunately, because TM rupture is inevitable
at pressures that recapitulate blast injury to the inner ear, and leads to loss of middle ear
function that affects the hearing assessments we employed, the relative contributions of
Author Manuscript

OHC loss and TM rupture could not be separately evaluated in detail. However, our data
show that damaging levels of sound are still transferred to the inner ear after TM rupture, as
animals subjected to triple blasts lost >50% of their basal OHCs, while single-blast animals
retained most of their OHCs. Moderate levels of pre-synaptic ribbon loss was observed in
the apical and middle turns of blast-exposed mice, but we did not find evidence of SGN loss
30 days after blast exposure. Our analysis did not reveal damage to the vestibular periphery,
nor did we find significant differences in VsEP characteristics between blast-exposed and

Hear Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2022 August 01.

 Mao et al. Page 14

control animals. Because balance is a multi-modal sense that is subject to central

Author Manuscript

compensation, future research on long-term effects of blast exposure should employ direct
assessments of vestibular function after blast exposure, such as VsEPs.

Supplementary Material
Refer to Web version on PubMed Central for supplementary material.

Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Weise Chang, Dr. Elizabeth Driver, and Kevin Isgrig for providing technical training and support for
this project. Dr. Joseph C. Burns played a large role in the initial conception of this project and helped secure
funding. The NIDCD veterinary team, particularly Dr. James McGehee and Patrick Diers, provided excellent care
to experimental mice during and after inter-institutional live transports. Dr. Carmen Brewer and Dr. Lisa
Cunningham provided valuable feedback on the manuscript.
Author Manuscript

Funding
This project was funded by United States Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Grant
W81XWH-15-2-0024 to J.B.L., Y.W. and M.W.K, the NIDCD’s Intramural Research Program (DC000059 to
M.W.K and DC000080 to the Mouse Auditory Testing Core), and NIDCD R01DC016919 to A.G.C.

References
Akin FW, Murnane OD, Hall CD, Riska KM, 2017. Vestibular consequences of mild traumatic brain
injury and blast exposure: a review. Brain Injury 31, 1188–1194. 10.1080/02699052.2017.1288928
[PubMed: 28981340]
Arun P, Wilder DM, Eken O, Urioste R, Batuure A, Sajja S, Van Albert S, Wang Y, Gist ID, Long JB,
2020. Long-Term Effects of Blast Exposure: A Functional Study in Rats Using an Advanced Blast
Simulator. Journal of Neurotrauma 37, 647–655. 10.1089/neu.2019.6591 [PubMed: 31595810]
Bucks SA, Cox BC, Vlosich BA, Manning JP, Nguyen TB, Stone JS, 2017. Supporting cells remove
Author Manuscript

and replace sensory receptor hair cells in a balance organ of adult mice. eLife 6, e18128. 10.7554/
eLife.18128 [PubMed: 28263708]
Cai L, Stomackin G, Perez NM, Lin X, Jung TT, Dong W, 2019. Recovery from tympanic membrane
perforation: Effects on membrane thickness, auditory thresholds, and middle ear transmission.
Hearing Research 384, 107813. 10.1016/j.heares.2019.107813 [PubMed: 31655347]
Cho S, Gao SS, Xia A, Wang R, Salles FT, Raphael PD, Abaya H, Wachtel J, Baek J, Jacobs D,
Rasband MN, Oghalai JS, 2013. Mechanisms of Hearing Loss after Blast Injury to the Ear. PLoS
ONE 8, e67618. 10.1371/journal.pone.0067618 [PubMed: 23840874]
Dandy WE, 1934. Effects on hearing after subtotal section of the cochlear branch of the auditory
nerve. Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital 240–243.
Dong W, Stomackin G, Lin X, Martin GK, Jung TT, 2019. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions:
Sensitive measures of tympanic -membrane perforation and healing processes in a gerbil model.
Hearing Research, Special Issue on MEMRO 2018 378, 3–12. 10.1016/j.heares.2019.01.015
[PubMed: 30709692]
Dror AA, Taiber S, Sela E, Hendzel O, Avraham KB, 2020. A mouse model for benign paroxysmal
Author Manuscript

positional vertigo (BPPV) with genetic predisposition for displaced otoconia. Genes Brain Behav
19, e12635. 10.1111/gbb.12635 [PubMed: 31898392]
Ewert DL, Lu J, Li W, Du X, Floyd R, Kopke R, 2012. Antioxidant treatment reduces blast-induced
cochlear damage and hearing loss. Hearing Research 285, 29–39. 10.1016/j.heares.2012.01.013
[PubMed: 22326291]
Fausti SA, Wilmington DJ, Gallun FJ, Myers PJ, Henry JA, 2009. Auditory and vestibular dysfunction
associated with blast-related traumatic brain injury. JRRD 46, 797. 10.1682/JRRD.2008.09.0118

Hear Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2022 August 01.

 Mao et al. Page 15

Fernandez KA, Jeffers PWC, Lall K, Liberman MC, Kujawa SG, 2015. Aging after noise exposure:
acceleration of cochlear synaptopathy in “recovered” ears. J Neurosci 35, 7509–7520. 10.1523/
Author Manuscript

JNEUROSCI.5138-14.2015 [PubMed: 25972177]

Harrod CG, Baker JF, 2003. The vestibulo ocular reflex (VOR) in otoconia deficient head tilt (het)
mutant mice versus wild type C57BL/6 mice. Brain Research 972, 75–83. 10.1016/
S0006-8993(03)02505-8 [PubMed: 12711080]
Heyburn L, Abutarboush R, Goodrich S, Urioste R, Batuure A, Statz J, Wilder D, Ahlers ST, Long JB,
Sajja VSSS, 2019. Repeated Low-Level Blast Overpressure Leads to Endovascular Disruption and
Alterations in TDP-43 and Piezo2 in a Rat Model of Blast TBI. Front. Neurol. 10. 10.3389/
fneur.2019.00766
Hickman TT, Smalt C, Bobrow J, Quatieri T, Liberman MC, 2018. Blast-induced cochlear
synaptopathy in chinchillas. Sci Rep 8, 10740. 10.1038/s41598-018-28924-7 [PubMed: 30013117]
Jones SM, Erway LC, Johnson KR, Yu H, Jones TA, 2004. Gravity receptor function in mice with
graded otoconial deficiencies. Hear Res 191, 34–40. 10.1016/j.heares.2004.01.008 [PubMed:
15109702]
Kallakuri S, Pace E, Lu H, Luo H, Cavanaugh J, Zhang J, 2018. Time course of blast-induced injury in
Author Manuscript

the rat auditory cortex. PLoS ONE 13, e0193389. 10.1371/journal.pone.0193389 [PubMed:
29489862]
Kim J, Xia A, Grillet N, Applegate BE, Oghalai JS, 2018. Osmotic stabilization prevents cochlear
synaptopathy after blast trauma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115, E4853–E4860. 10.1073/
pnas.1720121115 [PubMed: 29735658]
Kujawa SG, Liberman MC, 2015. Synaptopathy in the noise-exposed and aging cochlea: Primary
neural degeneration in acquired sensorineural hearing loss. Hearing Research 330, 191–199.
10.1016/j.heares.2015.02.009 [PubMed: 25769437]
Kujawa SG, Liberman MC, 2009. Adding Insult to Injury: Cochlear Nerve Degeneration after
“Temporary” Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. Journal of Neuroscience 29, 14077– 14085. 10.1523/
JNEUROSCI.2845-09.2009 [PubMed: 19906956]
Kujawa SG, Liberman MC, 2006. Acceleration of age-related hearing loss by early noise exposure:
evidence of a misspent youth. J Neurosci 26, 2115–2123. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4985-05.2006
[PubMed: 16481444]
Lew HL, 2007. Auditory dysfunction in traumatic brain injury. JRRD 44, 921–928. 10.1682/
Author Manuscript

JRRD.2007.09.0140
Liberman MC, Kiang NY, 1978. Acoustic trauma in cats. Cochlear pathology and auditory-nerve
activity. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 358, 1–63.
Lien S, Dickman JD, 2018. Vestibular Injury After Low-Intensity Blast Exposure. Front. Neurol 9,
297. 10.3389/fneur.2018.00297 [PubMed: 29867715]
Lin V, Golub JS, Nguyen TB, Hume CR, Oesterle EC, Stone JS, 2011. Inhibition Of Notch Activity
Promotes Nonmitotic Regeneration of Hair Cells in the Adult Mouse Utricles. J. Neurosci 31,
15329–15339. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2057-11.2011 [PubMed: 22031879]
Lobarinas E, Salvi R, Ding D, 2013. Insensitivity of the audiogram to carboplatin induced inner hair
cell loss in chinchillas. Hear. Res 302, 113–120. 10.1016/j.heares.2013.03.012 [PubMed:
23566980]
Mann CT, Fischer H, 2019. Recent Trends in Active-Duty Military Deaths (No. CRS In Focus,
IF10899). Congressional Research Service.
Mao JC, Pace E, Pierozynski P, Kou Z, Shen Y, VandeVord P, Haacke EM, Zhang X, Zhang J, 2012.
Author Manuscript

Blast-Induced Tinnitus and Hearing Loss in Rats: Behavioral and Imaging Assays. Journal of
Neurotrauma 29, 430–444. 10.1089/neu.2011.1934 [PubMed: 21933015]
Masri S, Zhang LS, Luo H, Pace E, Zhang J, Bao S, 2018. Blast Exposure Disrupts the Tonotopic
Frequency Map in the Primary Auditory Cortex. Neuroscience 379, 428–434. 10.1016/
j.neuroscience.2018.03.041 [PubMed: 29625214]
Mikaelian DO, Warfield D, 1970. Long-Term Partial Eighth Nerve Section in Cats: Effect on Auditory
Discrimination. Arch Otolaryngol 91, 371–375. 10.1001/archotol.1970.00770040529013
[PubMed: 5438736]

Hear Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2022 August 01.

 Mao et al. Page 16

Morozko EL, Nishio A, Ingham NJ, Chandra R, Fitzgerald T, Martelletti E, Borck G, Wilson E,
Riordan GP, Wangemann P, Forge A, Steel KP, Liddle RA, Friedman TB, Belyantseva IA, 2015.
Author Manuscript

ILDR1 null mice, a model of human deafness DFNB42, show structural aberrations of tricellular
tight junctions and degeneration of auditory hair cells. Human Molecular Genetics 24, 609–624.
10.1093/hmg/ddu474 [PubMed: 25217574]
Neff WD, 1947. The effects of partial section of the auditory nerve. Journal of Comparative and
Physiological Psychology 40, 203–215. 10.1037/h0056931 [PubMed: 20260231]
Owens BD, Kragh JFJ, Wenke JC, Macaitis J, Wade CE, Holcomb JB, 2008. Combat Wounds in
Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. The Journal of Trauma: Injury,
Infection, and Critical Care 64, 295–299. 10.1097/TA.0b013e318163b875
Qin Z, Wood M, Rosowski JJ, 2010. Measurement of Conductive Hearing Loss in Mice. Hear Res 263,
93–103. 10.1016/j.heares.2009.10.002 [PubMed: 19835942]
Sajja VS, Arun P, Van Albert SA, Long JB, 2018. Rodent Model of Primary Blast-Induced Traumatic
Brain Injury: Guidelines to Blast Methodology, in: Srivastava AK, Cox CS (), Pre-Clinical and
Clinical Methods in Brain Trauma Research, Neuromethods. Springer Science+Business Media,
LLC, part of Springer Nature, 123–138.
Author Manuscript

Saunders GH, Frederick MT, Arnold M, Silverman S, Chisolm TH, Myers P, 2015. Auditory
difficulties in blast-exposed Veterans with clinically normal hearing. J Rehabil Res Dev 52, 343–
360. 10.1682/JRRD.2014.11.0275 [PubMed: 26237266]
Sayyid ZN, Wang T, Chen L, Jones SM, Cheng AG, 2019. Atoh1 Directs Regeneration and Functional
Recovery of the Mature Mouse Vestibular System. Cell Reports 28, 312–324.e4. 10.1016/
j.celrep.2019.06.028 [PubMed: 31291569]
Scherer M, Burrows H, Pinto R, Somrack E, 2007. Characterizing Self-Reported Dizziness and
Otovestibular Impairment among Blast-Injured Traumatic Amputees: A Pilot Study. Military
Medicine 172, 731–737. 10.7205/MILMED.172.7.731 [PubMed: 17691686]
Schuknecht HF, Woellner RC, 1955. An Experimental and Clinical Study of Deafness from Lesions of
the Cochlear Nerve. J. Laryngol. Otol 69, 75–97. 10.1017/S0022215100050465 [PubMed:
14354340]
Sha S-H, Taylor R, Forge A, Schacht J, 2001. Differential vulnerability of basal and apical hair cells is
based on intrinsic susceptibility to free radicals. Hearing Research 155, 1–8. 10.1016/
S0378-5955(01)00224-6 [PubMed: 11335071]
Author Manuscript

Sosa MAG, De Gasperi R, Paulino AJ, Pricop PE, Shaughness MC, Maudlin-Jeronimo E, Hall AA,
Janssen WGM, Yuk FJ, Dorr NP, Dickstein DL, McCarron RM, Chavko M, Hof PR, Ahlers ST,
Elder GA, 2013. Blast overpressure induces shear-related injuries in the brain of rats exposed to a
mild traumatic brain injury. acta neuropathol commun 1, 51. 10.1186/2051-5960-1-51 [PubMed:
24252601]
Spoendlin H, 1975. Retrograde Degeneration of the Cochlear Nerve. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 79, 266–
275. 10.3109/00016487509124683 [PubMed: 1094788]
Studlack PE, Keledjian K, Farooq T, Akintola T, Gerzanich V, Simard JM, Keller A, 2018. Blast-
induced brain injury in rats leads to transient vestibulomotor deficits and persistent orofacial pain.
Brain Injury 32, 1866–1878. 10.1080/02699052.2018.1536282 [PubMed: 30346868]
Tona R, Chen W, Nakano Y, Reyes LD, Petralia RS, Wang Y-X, Starost MF, Wafa TT, Morell RJ,
Cravedi KD, du Hoffmann J, Miyoshi T, Munasinghe JP, Fitzgerald TS, Chudasama Y, Omori K,
Pierpaoli C, Banfi B, Dong L, Belyantseva IA, Friedman TB, 2019. The phenotypic landscape of a
Tbc1d24 mutant mouse includes convulsive seizures resembling human early infantile epileptic
Author Manuscript

encephalopathy. Human Molecular Genetics 28, 1530–1547. 10.1093/hmg/ddy445 [PubMed:

30602030]
Varas JM, Philippens M, Meijer SR, van den Berg AC, Sibma PC, van Bree JLMJ, de Vries DVWM,
2011. Physics of IED Blast Shock Tube Simulations for mTBI Research. Front Neurol 2. 10.3389/
fneur.2011.00058
Wang Y, Urioste RT, Wei Y, Wilder DM, Arun P, Sajja V, Gist ID, Fitzgerald TS, Chang W, Kelley
MW, Long JB, 2020. Blast-induced hearing impairment in rats is associated with structural and
molecular changes of the inner ear. Scientific Reports 10, 10652. 10.1038/s41598-020-67389-5
[PubMed: 32606369]

Hear Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2022 August 01.

 Mao et al. Page 17

Yu Y, Huang J, Tang X, Allison J, Sandlin D, Ding D, Pang Y, Zhang C, Chen T, Yin N, Chen L,
Mustain W, Zhou W, Zhu H, 2020. Exposure to blast shock waves via the ear canal induces deficits
Author Manuscript

in vestibular afferent function in rats. Journal of Otology S1672293019301333. 10.1016/

j.joto.2020.01.003
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript

Hear Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2022 August 01.

 Mao et al. Page 18

Highlights
Author Manuscript

• Blast exposure causes hearing loss with sensorineural and conductive

components

• Multiple blast exposures caused greater OHC loss and slower hearing
recovery

• Cochlear outer hair cells sustain damage even after tympanic membrane
rupture

• Blast-exposed mice sustained moderate loss of pre-synaptic ribbons

• Vestibular function and histology was not affected at the blast levels
employed
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript

Hear Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2022 August 01.

 Mao et al. Page 19
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript

Figure 1. Blast exposure causes both temporary and long-term threshold shifts.
a. Mean auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds at 8 kHz, 16 kHz, 32 kHz, and 40
kHz, for control, single- and triple-blast exposed mice before treatment (baseline), and at 1
day, 7 days, 30 days, 90 days, and 180 days after exposure. Significant threshold shifts were
Author Manuscript

observed at 1 day following either single or triple exposure at all frequencies and time
points. Single-blast exposed animals showed a gradual recovery of thresholds over time,
although significant differences from control persisted at all frequencies except 8 kHz, even
at 180 days of recovery. Threshold shifts in triple-blast exposed mice showed minimal (8
kHz) to no recovery. Error bars are standard error of the mean. b. Percentage of mice with
detectable DPOAEs at any frequency at each time point. Sample sizes from baseline to 180
days for control mice: 10, 8, 6, 8, 9, 7; for single blast mice: 14, 15, 14, 14, 7, 6; for triple-

Hear Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2022 August 01.

 Mao et al. Page 20

blast mice: 8, 12, 6, 5, 5, 4. Symbols within each time point have been laterally spaced for
Author Manuscript

better visualization. *p≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p≤0.001.

Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript

Hear Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2022 August 01.

 Mao et al. Page 21
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript

Figure 2. Blast exposure causes tympanic membrane (TM) rupture that typically heals by 30
days post-exposure.
In control ears, intact TMs were pearly gray and translucent. A light reflex was visible
Author Manuscript

where the TM reflected the light source (arrowheads, left upper and bottom panels). Light
reflexes were not observed in single- or triple-blasted ears 1 day after exposure; instead,
these TMs were ruptured, exhibiting torn edges (arrows, middle and right panels of top row).
At the 30 day recovery point, light reflexes were present in blast-exposed specimens
(arrowheads), but TMs displayed thickening or scarring (asterisks, middle and right panels
of bottom row).
Author Manuscript

Hear Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2022 August 01.

 Mao et al. Page 22
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript

Figure 3. Variable OHC loss occurs following blast exposure.

a. Representative confocal images of whole-mount cochlear turns 30 days after blast
exposure. MYO7A (green) labels hair cell bodies, and phalloidin (magenta) labels actin in
hair and supporting cells. A normal complement of IHCs and OHCs is present the apical and
Author Manuscript

mid cochlear regions for control, single- and triple-blasted animals. In contrast, OHCs are
clearly missing in the basal turn of a triple-blasted cochlea. b. Quantification of IHCs (top)
and OHCs (bottom) by cochlear turn and condition. Boxplot whiskers show standard error of
the mean. Significant decreases in OHCs were observed for both the middle and basal turns
following triple blasts. c. Same data as shown in b, plotted to show differences across time
points. Both single and triple-blast basal OHC counts were significantly different from those
of controls at every time point tested. Significant differences between triple- and single-blast

Hear Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2022 August 01.

 Mao et al. Page 23

basal OHC counts were present in some, but not all, time points. In addition, at the 7-day
Author Manuscript

time point significant differences were present between triple-blast and single-blast OHCs in
the apical turn of the cochlea and between control and triple-blast OHCs in the middle turn.
Sample sizes ranged from 3 to 15 ears and averaged 7.5; see Table 3 for specific numbers.
*p≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p≤0.001.
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript

Hear Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2022 August 01.

 Mao et al. Page 24
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript

Figure 4. The number of spiral ganglion neurons is unchanged 30 days after triple-blast
exposure.
a. Representative example of a mid-modiolar section showing spiral ganglion neuron cell
bodies (SGNs) within Rosenthal’s canal (RC). The SGNs of the middle cochlear turn are
Author Manuscript

boxed in red and shown in higher magnification in the inset. b. SGNs per section for each
cochlear turn. c. SGN density per 10,000 μm2 area for each cochlear turn. Boxplot whiskers
show standard error of the mean. No statistically significant differences in SGN number of
density were found between control and triple-blasted samples.
Author Manuscript

Hear Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2022 August 01.

 Mao et al. Page 25
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript

Figure 5. The number of inner hair cell (IHC) presynaptic puncta is reduced in blast-exposed
mice.
a. Labeling of CTBP2 presynaptic puncta in IHC synapses in the basal (top), middle
(middle), and apical turns (bottom) of control (left), single- (middle) and triple-blasted ears
(right) at the 30 day time point. b. Average number of pre-synaptic puncta from IHCs of
control and blast-exposed mice at the indicated time points post-exposure. The number of
presynaptic puncta was significantly decreased in the middle region for mice from both blast
groups and in the apex for the triple-blast mice. A similar decrease in the average number of
puncta per IHC was observed in the basal turn but this result did not reach significance.
Boxplot whiskers show standard error of the mean. *p≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p≤0.001.
Author Manuscript

Hear Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2022 August 01.

 Mao et al. Page 26
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript

Figure 6. Vestibular function is normal following blast exposure.

Assessment of vestibular evoked potentials (threshold, latency of the P1 wave and P1-N1
amplitude) from control, single- and triple-blasted mice. No significant differences between
conditions or recovery time points were identified. Boxplot whiskers show standard error of
the mean.
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript

Hear Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2022 August 01.

 Mao et al. Page 27
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript

Figure 7. The number of utricular hair cells is unchanged following blast exposure.
a. MYO7A immunostaining of control (left) and triple-blasted (right) utricles at 30 days
(top) and 180 days (bottom) post-exposure. The density of hair cells is comparable across
samples. While some decrease in striolar hair cells was evident in the triple blast sample at
180 days, a similar decrease was observed in the control. b. Utricular hair cells were counted
within five 2500 μm2 (50 μm × 50 μm) regions per utricle and averaged for each utricle.
Only one utricle per animal was counted. MYO7A, marking hair cell bodies, is stained in
magenta. c. Average utricular hair cell counts per 2500 μm2 region, plotted by time point.
Utricular HC density was not significantly affected by condition or time point. Boxplot
whiskers show standard error of the mean. d. Phalloidin staining of stereocilia bundles of a
control utricle at the 1-day time point (left)and triple blast utricle at the 180-day time point
(right). Bundle density is comparable across samples. The areas boxed in red are shown in
Author Manuscript

higher magnification in the insets.

Hear Res. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2022 August 01.