Professional Documents
Culture Documents
L08e1 Single Footing 1 Nov.2020zh1d
L08e1 Single Footing 1 Nov.2020zh1d
L08e1 Single Footing 1 Nov.2020zh1d
h=70 cm
M0
Characteristic bearing capacity of the foundation:
qk=420 kN/m2 ;
Lx
Solution:
1/5
Altınbaş University, Engineering & Natural Science Faculty, Civil
Engineering Department, Reinforced Concrete Structures- II, Nov.2020
N0 M0
q = ;qq ;q0
1,2 1 t ,net 2
A W
N0 M0
qt ,net − − =0
A W
Lx2 − N 0 L x 6 M 0
=0
L q − L q
y t ,net y t ,net
1710 Lx 6 246
L2x − − =0
2 265 2 265
Lx = 3.94m
Lx2 − N 0 L x 6 M 0
=0
L q − L q
y t ,net y t ,net
1214 Lx 6 307
L2x − − =0
2 275 2 275
Lx = 3.24m
In this design, the unfavorable loads are found to be occurred for the “vertical load case”.
Md0=246 kNm
Nd0=1710 kN
(260 +168)
V= 0.85 4.0 = 728kN
2
2
0.85
M = 728 = 309kNm
2
2
(260 + 221)
V= 1.7 2.0 = 818kN
1
2
2/5
Altınbaş University, Engineering & Natural Science Faculty, Civil
Engineering Department, Reinforced Concrete Structures- II, April-2020
1.72 1.7 2
M1 = 221 2 + (260 − 221) 2 1.7 = 714kNm
2 2 3
I
0.85 m
M2
Ly=2.0 m
V2
260
0.30 m
II II
0.85 m
168
I
1.70 m 0.60 m 1.70 m
Lx=4 m
V1 M1
168
221
260
(0.65 + 0.63)
Control of the shear force: dort = = 0.64m
2
V1=818 kN V2 = 728 kN
Vcr = 0.65 x fctd x bw x d Vcr = 0.65 x 1250 x 4 x 0.64 = 2080 kN
Vcr = 0.65 x 1250 x 2 x 0.64 =1040 kN Vcr > V2 OK
Vcr > V1 OK
d1 + d2
dort = = 0.64 m
2
(
U p = 2 bx + by ) = 4.36m
Md 0.4189
e = 0.4 = = 0.044m
x
Nd 1710
3/5
Altınbaş University, Engineering & Natural Science Faculty, Civil
Engineering Department, Reinforced Concrete Structures- II, April-2020
1 1
= = = 0.914
ex + ey 0.044 + 0.024
1+1.5 1+1.5
bx by 1.24 0.94
Vpd = 1463 kN
According to TBDY(2018), under static and seismic load conditions, the design value of the sliding
force (Vth) beneath the foundation should be less than the sliding capacity.
Vth=108 kN
Under drained conditions, design friction resistance can be calculated by considering the design
vertical compression force Ptv, the tan δ friction coefficient between the foundation and the
subgrade (considered as 0.5 according to TBDY 2018 Table 16.3, friction with a concrete subgrade
and γRh =1.1 (Table 16.2):
Even the design friction resistance Rth is greater than design sliding force Vth. Consequently, the
sliding safety is satisfied even without considering the Rpt design passive resistance.
6. RC design:
X direction (1-1 cross-section) (C30 /B420C)
h=70 cm
s
0.65
min A = 0.002 b d = 0.002 2000 650 = 2600mm2
s w
Ly=2.0 m
Choosen :1318(3302mm2 )
4/5
Altınbaş University, Engineering & Natural Science Faculty, Civil
Engineering Department, Reinforced Concrete Structures- II, April-2020
4 0.632
K= = 51410−5 ks = 2.79
309
d2=63 cm
309
h=70 cm
A = 2.79 = 1368mm2
s
0.63
min A = 0.002 b d = 0.002 4000 630 = 5040mm2
Lx=4 m s w
Choosen : 2018(5080mm2 )
7. Reinforcement layout:
5/5