The NBFC liquidity crisis in India began in 2018 when a major shadow lender, IL&FS, defaulted on its financial obligations. This sparked panic among investors and jeopardized other financial institutions. The primary causes of the crisis were IL&FS' defaults, complications in land acquisition that increased costs for NBFC projects, and a lack of timely action. NBFCs took on short-term borrowing to fund long-term loans, exacerbating the crisis when repayment from major borrowers was delayed or defaulted on. The government attempted to ease the short-term crisis by providing partial credit guarantees to encourage public banks to purchase assets from financially-sound NBFCs.
The NBFC liquidity crisis in India began in 2018 when a major shadow lender, IL&FS, defaulted on its financial obligations. This sparked panic among investors and jeopardized other financial institutions. The primary causes of the crisis were IL&FS' defaults, complications in land acquisition that increased costs for NBFC projects, and a lack of timely action. NBFCs took on short-term borrowing to fund long-term loans, exacerbating the crisis when repayment from major borrowers was delayed or defaulted on. The government attempted to ease the short-term crisis by providing partial credit guarantees to encourage public banks to purchase assets from financially-sound NBFCs.
The NBFC liquidity crisis in India began in 2018 when a major shadow lender, IL&FS, defaulted on its financial obligations. This sparked panic among investors and jeopardized other financial institutions. The primary causes of the crisis were IL&FS' defaults, complications in land acquisition that increased costs for NBFC projects, and a lack of timely action. NBFCs took on short-term borrowing to fund long-term loans, exacerbating the crisis when repayment from major borrowers was delayed or defaulted on. The government attempted to ease the short-term crisis by providing partial credit guarantees to encourage public banks to purchase assets from financially-sound NBFCs.
a major shadow lender IL&FS unexpectedly default. WHAT CAUSED THE CRISIS ? IL&FS group defaulted in payment obligations of bank loans and failed to meet the commercial paper redemption obligations. Consequently, ICRA downgraded the ratings of its short-term and long-term borrowing programmers. The defaults also jeopardized hundreds of investors, banks, and mutual funds associated with IL&FS.
The defaults sparked panic among
equity investors. A major reason behind the troubles of IL&FS was complications in land acquisition (The 2013 Land Acquisition Law). Cost escalation also led to many incomplete projects. Lack of timely action worsened the problems. Indian banking system grappling with the NPAs trying to increase their capital level acceptable to the RBI norms. This made the banks unable to finance large and long-term projects. The NBFC tried to seize this opportunity and started lending to big and long-term projects such as loans to developers, infrastructure financing, home loan, and corporate financing. However, they took short term borrowing in the form of the mutual fund, commercial paper and lend them for the long term. As the inflows got dried, the repayment to the borrower became difficult. The problem got worsen when the big borrowers (such as DHFL and Reliance) either delayed or defaulted in their repayment. These are the primary reason for the NBFC crisis in India. STEPS TAKEN BY THE GOVERNMENT TO EASE THE CRISIS IN THE SHORT TERM The government measures to provide partial credit guarantee to public sector bank on their asset purchases from NBFCs can ease funding pressure only for the short-term, says a report.
In the budget, the government
had said for purchase of high- rated pooled assets of financially- sound NBFCs, amounting to Rs 1 trillion during the current financial year, it will provide a one-time six months' partial credit guarantee to public sector banks for their first loss of up to 10 percent. The funding stress has been most severe for wholesale financiers, smaller NBFCs and fintechs, which have struggled to get even bank funds, while large NBFCs still have good access to funding, albeit at a rising cost, the report said.
The report however said NBFCs will
benefit more from the Rs 70,000 crore recapitalisation of state-owned banks, which will increase their capacity to lend more.
Investor confidence in the NBFC sector
could also be boosted by a potential asset-quality review of wholesale non- banking lenders, leading to greater transparency and more robust capital requirements.