Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Geopolitics and Chinas Geostrategic Choices
Geopolitics and Chinas Geostrategic Choices
Weifeng
Denies the importance of the theory of the central zone of Eurasia, but
believes that due to the sparse population of the central zone of the Eurasian
continent, the degree of social organization is difficult to achieve the level of
concentration of large-scale resources. On the contrary, the eastern and
western edges of the Eurasian continent are both It is an area with
concentrated population, rich resources and a high degree of social
organization. He believes that the core area of the world is the edge area on
the east and west sides of Eurasia. Therefore, his research conclusion is that
if there is sufficient integration in the western or eastern edge A country with
population and resource capacity, and can achieve a high degree of
organized industrialization, is very likely to become a powerful country.
"Whoever masters the most potential regions in the world is expected to
become a world power in Eurasia; whoever becomes Eurasia Whoever is the
world power on the mainland will become the challenger of the world
superpower America.
Land is the carrier of human existence and a necessary condition for the
existence of a country. The ocean not only has huge natural resources, which
is the most effective way to create wealth, but also shoulders the important
task of connecting the world and protecting the interests of overseas
markets, resources and shipping. Therefore, land and sea Combining
geographic strategies can resist the possible joint attack of powerful enemies
on land and sea, and avoid being attacked by the enemy. In the new era of
China's peaceful rise, we must realize that a nation that has lost control of
the sea must not be a powerful nation, especially today. May become the
geographic hub underpinning China's rise, we must turn our strategic focus
to the ocean.
(1) The South China Sea issue. With the deepening of economic
globalization, the strategic position of the South China Sea and the Nansha
Islands has become increasingly apparent. Many countries coveted the South
China Sea oil resources, which is the main reason for the intensification of
disputes in the South China Sea. In recent years, China has been
emphasizing full or partial sovereignty over the Nansha Islands, relying on
the huge wealth of oil and gas resources in the South China Sea to
continuously expand its armaments and accelerate the pace of construction
in the future battlefields of the South China Sea.
How to deal with the exchanges with different countries in ASEAN has
become the main aspect of solving this problem. Although the ten ASEAN
countries are bound by the charter, there are still some internal omissions,
and there are often conflicts of interests with my country. Our country needs
to choose the right time. Focus on strengthening cooperation with one or
more countries, focusing on striving for Myanmar, Laos, Cambodia. At the
same time, actively seek to reach an understanding and joint cooperation
with Taiwan.
China should be extra cautious when dealing with its strong neighbors in
East Asia. From a broader perspective, as China increasingly participates in
international politics as a major power, in the Asia-Pacific region, China is
not only related to Japan, the actual It is also inevitable that there will be
more strategic frictions with the United States. When the United States
returned Okinawa to Japan in 1972, it packaged the Diaoyu Islands together
regardless of China’s objection, which has become a security risk today. In
fact, it should be considered as the United States’ own strategic tradition A
deliberate arrangement in East Asian geopolitics, the two countries in the
East Asian world that are most likely to pose a strategic challenge to the
United States are caught in a fight with each other over the Diaoyu Islands
issue, and the United States can reap the benefits.
Historically, the foreign policies and behaviors in the process of the rise
of great powers have shown strong shadows of geopolitical ideology. This
fully shows that geopolitical ideology has played an important guiding role
in the pattern and strategic orientation of the rise of great powers. At the
same time, geopolitical factors are Gradually replacing ideology, it has
become an important factor for a country to consider in its foreign
exchanges. As analyzed above, the changes and status quo in the geostrategy
of China's neighboring countries and major powers have prompted China to
pay more attention to the strategic significance of geopolitics, and in the
protection of territories On the basis of the integrity of sovereignty, it not
only pays attention to the strategic bad environment of land, but also pays
attention to the maintenance of the geographical significance of sea power.
These changes are in line with the fact that "the world has formed a civilized
system in which geopolitics, geoeconomics and geoculture are intertwined.
The realization of national interests requires a stable framework of regional
and global international relations, coordination and cooperation among
countries, and a joint response to the challengeChina is a traditional land
power, and in the process of historical development, it has formed a
"concentric circle" system of East Asian Chinese and Barbarians centered on
itself. The core of this model is the central Central Plains dynasty, which is
politically, economically and culturally advanced, and the periphery is the
neighboring countries that communicate with the Central Plains dynasty,
study, accept canonization, and pay tribute. of wasteland. Owen Lattimore, a
well-known American geopolitical and ethnologist in the 1920s and 1930s,
wrote in his famous book "China's Inland Frontiers in Asia" through the
interaction between the farming civilization of the Central Plains and the
Mongolian steppe civilization. The analysis of the relationship has extracted
the characteristics of China's so-called "inner-Asianness".
The Middle East and the deep inland Central Asia have become the
"vehicles" of various civilizations in the Eurasian continent, where the
intersections occurred in different periods of ancient history. Therefore,
Toynbee refers to the "Syria and the Wuhu River-Yaosha River Basin". "The
area is called "Traffic Roundabout". As an ancient civilization in the East
Asian continent, China has had direct and indirect exchanges with South
Asia, West Asia, and Europe through the inland "Silk Road" and "Prairie
Road", which reflects the ancient "Continental Age" background of Asia.
Characteristics of Interactions among Civilizations in Continental Europe.
At the same time, China sailed around the Eurasian continent through the
"Maritime Silk Road" (or "Porcelain Road"), which also directly connected
East Asia, South Asia, West Asia and even Africa.
Whether Portugal and Spain in the early 16th century divided the world
with the "Pope's Meridian", or "sea coachmen" galloping across the world's
oceans, and then to the control of the entire ocean by the so-called "Empire
on which the Sun Never Sets", and even after the Cold War The only
superpower, the United States, supports its global leadership by controlling
the world's major ocean passages, while the Western powers support a
European-centered world and a Western-dominated international system
through ocean development, ocean expansion, and ocean domination.
Western countries, as "the marginal countries or maritime countries of
Eurasia on the world island", have conquered the other side of the continent
and the world with industrialized power from one side of the coast, across
the ocean, and then conquered the world; while the United States on the
North American continent has After World War II, it controlled the edge of
the Eurasian continent across the Atlantic and the Pacific, curbed the
expansion of land power from the heart of the continent, and tried to build a
hegemonic-led unipolar international system.
In the maritime age, "the ability to enable troops and caravans to pass
through the vast ocean between home, allied, and wartime desired territories,
while at the same time deterring such actions by the adversary," is
particularly important, a capability known as for sea power. It should be said
that sea power has an important relationship with the ocean age. The country
that masters the sea power can become the leader of the ocean age, and the
ocean is the core platform for the realization of international power. As a
result, the so-called "Mediterranean Era", "Atlantic Era" and "Pacific Era"
have formed the cognition of the international relations system basically
established by academic circles. Western academic circles once used the so-
called "Mediterranean era" to describe the fact that Spain dominated the
European international society through foreign expansion and conquest.
After that, the Netherlands, France, the United Kingdom and other countries
successively expanded overseas through the Atlantic Ocean to the world. In
the end, the United Kingdom won and established the "Empire on which the
Sun Never Sets". For this first emerging global hegemon, "if the British
Empire loses control of the seas, everything will be lost". This is an
"Atlantic era" dominated by Western colonialism.
From these 13 landmark projects, we can see that the basic logic behind
China's economic rise is that infrastructure investment promotes the
country's economic development.
[1] Jin Canrong. Changes in the international geopolitical pattern and its
impact on China. Modern International Relations. 2008 (5)
[2] Liu Tao. First class power. Beijing: China Friendship Publishing
House.
[8] Feng Shaolei. Geopolitical changes since the new century and
China's diplomatic choices. Social Sciences, 2005 (2)
[9] Fang Yonggang, Tang Fuquan. Great Powers Compete: The New
Geopolitics. Chengdu: Sichuan People's Publishing House, 2001.
[12] Lu Junyuan. The nature and laws of geopolitics. Beijing: Jiji Press,
2005.
[13] Li Yihu. Geopolitics: The Dichotomy and Its Transcendence—Also
on China’s Choice in Geointegration. Beijing: Peking University Press,
2007.
[14] Shi Dongming. Security dilemma, geopolitics and the rise of China.
Theoretical Observations, 2006 (3)