List of Tributary States of China

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 22

List of tributary states of China

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Redirected from List of tributaries of Imperial China)

Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is a list of states that paid tribute to the Central Plain dynasties of China
under the tributary system. It encompassed states in Europe, East Asia, South Asia,
Central Asia and Southeast Asia.[1]

Contents

 1 List of tributaries
 2 By dynasty
o 2.1 Western Han
o 2.2 Xin
o 2.3 Eastern Han
o 2.4 Jin, Northern and Southern, Tang
o 2.5 Song
o 2.6 Yuan
o 2.7 Ming
o 2.8 Qing
 3 See also
 4 References
o 4.1 Citations
o 4.2 Sources
 5 External links

List of tributaries

In the 5th century, a status hierarchy was an explicit element of the tributary system in
which Korea and Vietnam were ranked higher than others, including Japan, the
Ryukyus, Siam and others.[2] All diplomatic and trade missions were construed in the
context of a tributary relationship with China,[3] including:

This is a dynamic list and may never be able to satisfy particular standards for completeness.
You can help by adding missing items with reliable sources.

 Brunei (文萊)[4]
o Borneo[5]
o Poni (渤泥)[6][7]
 Cambodia[8]
o Kingdom of Funan[9]
o Zhenla[10]
 Japan[11][12]
o Wa (Japan) (16 tribute missions)[13][14][15]
o Asuka Japan (5 tribute missions)[16][17]
o Nara/Heian Japan (16 tribute missions)[18][19][20][21]
o Ashikaga shogunate (20 tribute missions) [22][23]
 Korea[24][25]
o Goguryeo (173 tribute missions) [24][26]
o Baekje (45 tribute missions) [24][26]
o Silla (19 tribute missions) [24][26][27][28]
o Unified Silla (63 tribute missions in 8th century) [24][28]
o Goryeo (The envoy missions)[24][29]
o Joseon (391 envoy missions between 1392 and 1450,[30] 435 special embassy
missions between 1637 and 1881.[31])[24][26][29]
 Malaysia
o Tanah Merah Kingdom[32]
o Kedah Kingdom[33]
o Kelantan[34]
o Malacca Sultanate[35]
 Nepal[7][36]
 Philippines[37]
o Sulu[8]
 Ryūkyū Kingdom (Ryukyuan missions to Imperial China)[38][39][40]
o Hokuzan[41]
o Chūzan[7][42]
o Nanzan[41]
 Siam (Thailand)[38][43]
 Tibet[44]
 Vietnam[38][45]
 Ceylon (Sri Lanka)[46]

The Portraits of Periodical Offering of Liang. 6th-century painting in National Museum of


China. Ambassadors from right to left: Uar (Hephthalites); Persia; Baekje (Korea); Qiuci; Wo
(Japan); Langkasuka (in present-day Malaysia); Dengzhi (鄧至) (Qiang) Ngawa; Zhouguke (周
古柯), Hebatan (呵跋檀), Humidan (胡密丹), Baiti (白題, of similar Hephthalite people), who
dwell close to Hephthalite; Mo (Qiemo).

By dynasty
Western Han

 Internal vassals (206 BC - ?) – Upon the founding of the dynasty, the first emperor
awarded up to one-half of territory of Han as fiefdoms to various relatives, who
ruled as princes. These fiefdoms collected their own taxes and established their own
laws and were not directly administered by imperial government. Consolidation and
centralization by succeeding emperors increased imperial controls, gradually
dissolving the princedoms. During the period of Three kingdoms, Japan's king also
sent tribute to Cao Rui stating about his status as a vassal to the Rui.
 Dayuan (102 BC) – Kingdom located in the Fergana Valley. Hearing tales of their
high-quality horses, which would be of great utility in combatting the Xiongnu,
Emperor Wu of Han dispatched an expedition to acquire their submission and the
horses. The first expedition of 3,000 was woefully undermanned, but the second,
numbering 100,000 besieged the capital, bringing them into submission after
negotiations. The expedition returned with 10,000 horses along with a promise to
pay an annual tribute in horses[citation needed].
 Dian Kingdom (109 BC) – A kingdom located in modern-day Yunnan province.
Brought into subjugation by Emperor Wu of Han, who annexed the kingdom into an
imperial commandary but allowed local rulers to remain in power.
 Jushi (108 BC) – City-state in modern-day Turpan. Brought into submission by an
imperial expedition dispatched by Emperor Wu of Han.[47]
 Loulan (108 BC) – Located along the northeastern edge of the Taklamakan Desert in
modern-day Xinjiang province. Brought into submission by an imperial expedition
dispatched by Emperor Wu of Han.[47]
 Minyue (138 BC - ?) – A Baiyue people situated in modern-day Fujian province. After
an attack by the Minyue people, Emperor Wu of Han launched a massive expedition,
and forced their entire population to relocate within imperial borders.
 Nanyue (211 BC - 111 BC) – A kingdom situated today's northern Vietnam, and the
provinces of Guangdong and Guangxi founded by a former Chinese general, Zhao
Tuo. Under Zhao Tuo it paid nominal tribute to Han but his successors lost more and
more power. After a coup d'état against the king, Han directly conquered the
kingdom and directly administered it from then on. [47]
 Xiongnu (53 BC - 10) – A nomadic confederation/empire in Central Asia and modern
day Mongolia and extending their control to territories as far as Siberia, western
Manchuria, the areas along the Caspian Sea, and modern day Chinese provinces of
Inner Mongolia, Gansu and Xinjiang. They entered tributary relations with the Han
after several defeats, territorial losses, and internal conflicts [citation needed]. Tributary
relationships terminated as a result of diplomatic fumblings during the reign of
Wang Mang. Xinjiang passed to Chinese control after their defeat. [47]
 Wusun (105 BC - ?) – Central Asian people. Bitter enemies with the Xiongnu, they
entered a military alliance with the Han. In 53 BC, the kingdom split into two
following a succession dispute. Both continued to recognize Han sovereignty and
remained faithful vassals[citation needed].

Xin

During Wang Mang's reign, relations with many of the empire's allies and tributaries
deteriorated, due in large part to Wang Mang's arrogance and inept diplomacy.

Eastern Han

 Khotan – King Guangde of Khotan submitted to the Han dynasty in 73 AD. In 129:
Fangqian, the king of Khotan, sent an envoy to offer tribute to Han. The Emperor
pardoned the crime of the king of Khotan, ordering him to hand back the kingdom of
Keriya. Fangqian refused. Two years later Fangqian send one of his sons to serve and
offer tribute at the Chinese Imperial Palace.
 Southern Xiongnu (50 - 220) – The Xiongnu split into northern and southern factions.
The southern Xiongnu brought themselves into tributary relations with the Han.
They were resettled along with large numbers of Chinese immigrants in frontier
regions. Economically dependent on Han, they were obliged to provide military
services under a tightened tributary system with greater direct imperial supervision.

Jin, Northern and Southern, Tang

In the 5th century the Wa (Japan during the Kofun period) sent five tributes to the Jin
and to the Liu Song dynasty and the emperors promoted the five kings to the title like
Supreme Military Commander of the Six States of Wa, Silla, Mimana, Gaya, Jinhan
and Mahan.

According to the Xīn Táng shū the kingdom of Zhēnlà had conquered different
principalities in Northwestern Cambodia after the end of the Yǒnghuī (永徽) era (i.e.
after 31 January 656), which previously (in 638/39) paid tribute to China.[48]

The Chinese retaliated against Cham which was raiding the Rinan coast around 430s-
440s by seizing Qusu, and then plundering the capital of the Cham around Huế.
Around 100,000 jin in gold was the amount of plunder. Lin Yi then paid 10,000 jin in
gold, 100,000 jin in silver, and 300,000 jin in copper in 445 as tribute to China. The
final tribute paid to China from Lin Yi was in 749, among the items were 100 strings
of pearls, 30 jin gharuwood, baidi, and 20 elephants.[49]

Enslaved people from tributary countries were sent to Tang China by various groups,
the Cambodians sent albinos, the Uyghurs sent Turkic Karluks, the Japanese sent
Ainu, and Göktürk (Tujue) and Tibetan girls were also sent to China.[50] Prisoners
captured from Liaodong, Korea, and Japan were sent as tribute to China from Balhae.
[51]
Tang dynasty China received 11 Japanese girl dancers as tribute from Balhae in
777.[52]

Song

The Song dynasty received 302 tribute missions from other countries. Vietnamese
missions consisted of 45 of them, another 56 were from Champa. More tribute was
sent by Champa in order to curry favor from China against Vietnam.[53] Champa
brought as tribute Champa rice, a fast-growing rice strain, to China, which massively
increased Chinese yields of rice.[54][55]

In 969 the son of King Li Shengtian named Zongchang sent a tribute mission to
China. According to Chinese accounts, the King of Khotan offered to send in tribute
to the Chinese court a dancing elephant captured from Kashgar in 970.[56]

Yuan

The Mongols extracted tribute from throughout their empire.[57] From Goryeo, they
received gold, silver, cloth, grain, ginseng, and falcons.[58][59] The tribute payments
were a burden on Goryeo and subjugated polities in the empire.[58][59][60] As with all
parts of the Mongol Empire, Goryeo provided palace women, eunuchs, Buddhist
monks, and other personnel to the Mongols.[61]
Just as Korean women entered the Yuan court, the Korean Koryo kingdom also saw
the entry of Mongol women.[62] Great power was attained by some of the Korean
women who entered the Yuan court.[63] One example is the Empress Ki (Qi) and her
eunuch Bak Bulhwa when they attempted a major coup of Northern China and Koryo.
[64]
King Ch'ungson (1309–1313) married two Mongol women, Princess Botasirin and
a non-royal woman named Yesujin. She gave birth to a son and had a posthumous
title of "virtuous concubine". In addition 1324, the Yuan court sent a Mongol princess
of Wei named Jintong to the Koryo King Ch'ungsug.[65] Thus, the entry of Korean
women into the Yuan court was reciprocated by the entry of Yuan princesses into the
Goryeo court, and this affected relations between Korea and the Yuan. Marriages
between the imperial family of Yuan existed between certain states. These included
the Onggirat tribe, Idug-qut's Uighur tribe, the Oirat tribe, and the Koryo (Korean)
royal family.[66][67]

Ming

A Ming-era painting of a tribute giraffe, which was thought to be a Qilin by court officials,
from Bengal

Under the Ming dynasty, countries that wanted to have any form of relationship with
China, political, economic or otherwise, had to enter the tribute system. As a result,
tribute was often paid for opportunistic reasons rather than as a serious gesture of
allegiance to the Chinese emperor, and the mere fact that tribute was paid may not be
understood in a way that China had political leverage over its tributary.[68] Also some
tribute missions may just have been up by ingenious traders. A number of countries
only paid tribute once, as a result of Zheng He's expeditions. As of 1587, in Chinese
sources the following countries are listed to have paid tribute to the Ming emperors:[69]
The Hongwu Emperor started tributary relations in 1368, emissaries being sent to
countries like Korea, Vietnam, Champa, Japan, of which Korea, Vietnam, and
Champa sent back tribute in 1369. During Hongwu's rule, Liuch'iu sent 20, Korea sent
20, Champa sent 19, and Vietnam sent 14 tribute missions.[70] The tribute system was
an economically profitable form of government trade, and Korea requested and
successfully increased the number of tributes sent to Ming from once every three
years to three times each year starting in 1400, and eventually four times each year
starting in 1531.[71]

The 1471 Vietnamese invasion of Champa and Ming Turpan Border Wars were either
started by or marked by disruptions in the tribute system.

 Alania[citation needed]
 Almalik (?)
 Altan Khan (annually since 1570)
 Anding (?) (beginning in 1374)
 Arabia (Tienfang, identical to Mecca?) (somewhere between 1426 and 1435, 1517,
sometimes between 1522 and 1566)
 Aru (1407)
 Ava (1408)[72]
 Badakhshan
 Bai(?)
 Baihua (?) (1378)
 Baiyin (?)
 Balkh
 Bengal (1408, 1414, 1438)
 Borneo (Solo?) (1406)
 Brunei (1371, 1405, 1408, 1414, 1425)
 Bukhara (?)
 Cambodia (Chenla, since 1371)
 Cail, Djofar, Maldives, Burma (Yawa), Lambri (Nanwuli, on Sumatra), Kelantan,
Qilani(?), Xialabi (Arabia?), Kuchani (?), Wushelatang(?), Aden, Rum, Bengal,
Shelaqi(?), Bakoyi(?), Coimbatore, Heigada(?), Lasa(?), Barawa, Mogadishu,
Qianlida(?), Kannur (all somewhere between 1403 and 1425)
 Calicut (1405, 1407, 1409)
 Chalish
 Ceylon (1411, 1412, 1445, 1459)
 Champa (every three years since 1369)
 Pangasinan (since 1406)
 Chijin (another group of Mongols?) (beginning in 1404, every five years since 1563)
 Chola (1370, 1372, 1403)
 Cochin (1404, 1412)
 Coimbatore (1411)
 Dahui (?) (1405)
 Danba (?) (1377)
 Doyan (?), Fuyü(?), Taining(?) (1388, twice a year from 1403)
 Ejijie (?), Hashin(?) (somewhere between 1522 and 1566)
 Ganshi (?)
 Gumala (?) (1420)
 Guosasü (?)
 Gulibanzu (Pansur?) (1405)
 Hadilan (Khotelan?)
 Halie'er (?)
 Hami (beginning in 1404, annually from 1465, every five years from 1475)
 Handong (?) (?)
 Hasan(?)
 Herat (1402, 1409, 1437)
 Hotan (1408?)
 Huotan (identical to Khujand?)
 Ilbalik and Beshbalik (1391, 1406, 1413, 1418(?), 1437, 1457ff)
 Jaunpur (1420)
 Japan (every 10 years)[2]
 Java (1372, 1381, 1404, 1407, every three years for some time after 1443)
 Jienzhou (?) (annually)
 Jong (?)
 Joseon (Korea)[2]
 Jurchens and other tribes in the northeast (irregularly)
 Karakhodjo (1409, 1430, afterwards together with Turfan)
 Kashgar
 Kashmir
 Khorasan (1432)
 Khujand
 Kollam (1407)
 Koqie (?)
 Kucha
 Kuncheng (Kunduz?)
 Lanbang (?) (1376, 1403–1435)
 Liuchen (?) (1430, afterwards together with Turfan)
 Liuqiu (Ryukyu Islands, every two years since 1368)
 Malacca (1405, 1411, 1412, 1414, 1424, 1434, 1445ff, 1459)
 Melinde (1414)
 Niekoli (or Miekoli) (?)
 Medina (somewhere between 1426 and 1435)
 Nishapur
 Ormus (1405)
 Pahang (1378, 1414)
 Pala (?)
 Palembang (1368, 1371, 1373, 1375, 1377)
 Samudra (1383, 1405, 1407, 1431, 1435)
 Philippines (1372, 1405, 1576)
 Quxian (1437)
 Sairam
 Samarkand (1387, 1389, 1391 etc., after 1523 every five years)
 Saolan (identical to Sairam?)
 Shadiman (?)
 Shehei (?)
 Shiraz
 Sukhothai (every three years since 1371-1448)
 Sulu (1417, 1421)
 Syria (Fulin?, 1371)
 Tabriz
 Tamerlane (1387, 1391)[citation needed]
 Tibet[citation needed]
 Tieli (?), Zhiloxiashi (?), Marinduque (1405)
 Togmak
 Turfan (1430, 1497, 1509, 1510, every 5 years since 1523)
 Vietnam (every three years since 1369)
 Wala (Oirads) (beginning in 1403, annually, with interruptions, since 1458)
 Wulun (?)
 Yarkand
 Yaxi (?)
 Yesücheng (?)
 Zhilo (?), Badakhshan, Andkhui, Isfahan, Shiraz.[73] (somewhere between 1403 and
1424)
 A number of Tibetan temples and tribes from the Tibetan border or the southwest.

Tribute in the form of servants, eunuchs, and virgin girls came from: Ming's various
ethnic-minority tribes, tribes on the Mongolian Plateau, Korea,[74] Vietnam,[75]
Cambodia, Central Asia, Siam, Champa, and Okinawa.[76]

There were Korean, Jurchen, Mongol, Central Asian, and Vietnamese eunuchs under
the Yongle Emperor,[77][78] including Mongol eunuchs who served him while he was
the Prince of Yan.[79] In 1381, Muslim and Mongol eunuchs were captured from
Yunnan, and possibly among them was the great Ming maritime explorer Zheng He.
[80]
Vietnamese eunuchs like Ruan Lang, Ruan An, Fan Hong, Chen Wu, and Wang
Jin were sent by Zhang Fu to the Ming.[81] During Ming's early contentious relations
with Joseon, when there were disputes such as competition for influence over the
Jurchens in Manchuria, Korean officials were even flogged by Korean-born Ming
eunuch ambassadors when their demands were not met.[82] Some of the ambassadors
were arrogant, such as Sin Kwi-saeng who, in 1398, got drunk and brandished a knife
at a dinner in the presence of the king.[83][84] Sino-Korean relations later became
amiable, and Korean envoys' seating arrangement in the Ming court was always the
highest among the tributaries.[82] A total of 198 eunuchs were sent from Korea to
Ming.[85]

On 30 Jan 1406, the Ming Yongle Emperor expressed horror when the Ryukyuans
castrated some of their own children to become eunuchs in order to give them to
Yongle. Yongle said that the boys who were castrated were innocent and didn't
deserve castration, and he returned the boys to Ryukyu and instructed them not to
send eunuchs again.[86]

Joseon sent a total of 114 women to the Ming dynasty, consisting of 16 virgin girls
(accompanied by 48 female servants), 42 cooks (執饌女), and 8 musical performers
(歌舞女).[87][88] The women were sent to the Yongle and Xuande emperors in a total of
7 missions between 1408 and 1433.[88] Xuande was the last Ming emperor to receive
human tribute from Korea;[82] with his death in 1435, 53 Korean women were
repatriated.[89][90] There was much speculation that the Yongle Emperor's real mother
was a Korean[91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99] or Mongolian[100] concubine.[101][102][103] Relations
between Ming China and Joseon Korea improved dramatically and became much
more amicable and mutually profitable during Yongle's reign.[95] Yongle and Xuande
were said to have a penchant for Korean cuisine and women.[95][104][105]
An anti pig slaughter edict led to speculation that the Zhengde Emperor adopted Islam
due to his use of Muslim eunuchs who commissioned the production of porcelain with
Persian and Arabic inscriptions in white and blue color.[106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113][114]
Muslim eunuchs contributed money in 1496 to repairing Niujie Mosque. Central
Asian women were provided to the Zhengde Emperor by a Muslim guard and Sayyid
Hussein from Hami.[115] The guard was Yu Yung and the women were Uighur.[116] It is
unknown who really was behind the anti-pig slaughter edict.[117] The speculation of
him becoming a Muslim is remembered alongside his excessive and debauched
behavior along with his concubines of foreign origin.[118] Muslim Central Asian girls
were favored by Zhengde like how Korean girls were favored by Xuande.[119] A
Uighur concubine was kept by Zhengde.[120] Uighur and Mongol women were favored
by the Zhengde emperor.[121]

Qing

"Moghul embassy", seen by the Dutch visitors in Beijing in 1656. According to Lach & Kley
(1993), modern historians (namely, Luciano Petech) think that the emissaries portrayed had
actually come from Turfan, and not all the way from the Moghul India.

The Dutch embassy before the Court and the Qianlong Emperor in 1795. The Dutch embassy
was the last European embassy sent to China under the tributary system.

This list covers states that sent tribute between 1662 and 1875, and were not covered
under the Lifanyuan. Therefore, Tibet or the Khalkha are not included, although they
did send tribute in the period given:[122]

 Đại Nam (Vietnam) (annually, every three years)


 Dzungars (1681, 1685, 1735, 1738, 1742, 1743, 1745, 1746, 1752, and 1753)
 Hunza (1761)[123]
 Joseon (Korea) (three or four times a year;[124][125] 435 embassies, 1637-1881[2])
 Khanate of Kokand (between 1774–1798)[citation needed]
 Kirgiz (1757 and 1758)
 Lanfang Republic
 Laos (17 times)
 Netherlands (1663(?), 1667, 1686, and 1795).[126][127]
 Nepal (1732(?), 1792, 1794, 1795, 1823, 1842, and 1865)
 Portugal (1670, 1678, 1752, and 1753)
 Ryukyu (every two years on average, 122 times in total between 1662 and 1875)
 Siam (Thailand) (48 times, most of them after 1780 and before the reign of Rama IV)
 Sikkim (since 1791)
 Sulu Sultanate (1726,[128] 1733, 1743, 1747, 1752, 1753, and 1754)
 Turpan (1673 and 1686)
 Uluğ Orda[129]

After the Second Manchu invasion of Korea, Joseon Korea was forced to give several
of their royal princesses as concubines to the Qing Manchu regent Prince Dorgon.[130]
[131][132][133][134][135][136]
In 1650, Dorgon married the Korean Princess Uisun (義順).[137]
The Princess' name in Korean was Uisun, she was Prince Yi Kaeyoon's
(Kumrimgoon) daughter.[138] Dorgon married two Korean princesses at Lianshan.[139]

The tribute system did not dissolve in 1875, but tribute embassies became less
frequent and regular: twelve more Korean embassies until 1894, one more (abortive)
from Liuqiu in 1877, three more from Vietnam, and four from Nepal, the last one in
1908.[122]

In 1886, after Britain took over Burma, they maintained the sending of tribute to
China, putting themselves in a lower status than in their previous relations.[140] It was
agreed in the Burma convention in 1886 that China would recognize Britain's
occupation of Upper Burma while Britain continued the Burmese payment of tribute
every ten years to Peking.[141]

See also

 Chinese expansionism
 Chinese nationalism
 Emperor at home, king abroad
 Foreign relations of imperial China
o Foreign relations of China
 Greater China
 History of China#Imperial China
 Tributary system of China
 List of recipients of tribute from China
 Silk Road
 Sinocentrism
 Zheng He
 Adoption of Chinese literary culture
 Suzerainty
 Tributary state
 Tribute
References
Citations

1.

 Gundry, R. S. "China and her Tributaries," National Review (United Kingdom), No. 17, July
1884, pp. 605-619., p. 605, at Google Books
  Kang, David C. (2010). East Asia Before the West: Five Centuries of Trade and Tribute, p.
59., p. 59, at Google Books

  Wang, Zhenping. (2005). Ambassadors from the islands of immortals: China-Japan


relations in the Han-Tang period, pp. 4-5, p. 4, at Google Books; excerpt, criticizing "the
western tributary theory, which sees the world only from the viewpoint of the Chinese and
overly simplifies the intricate domestic and international situations ...."

  Mohammad Al-Mahdi Tan Kho; Hurng-yu Chen (July 2014). "Malaysia-Philippines


Territorial Dispute: The Sabah Case" (PDF). National Chengchi University. NCCU Institutional
Repository. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 May 2016. Retrieved 9 May 2016.

  Wan Kong Ann; Victor H. Mair; Paula Roberts; Mark Swofford (April 2013). "Examining
the Connection Between Ancient China and Borneo Through Santubong Archaeological Sites"
(PDF). Tsinghua University and Department of East Asian Languages and Civilizations,
University of Pennsylvania. Sino-Platonic Papers. ISSN 2157-9687. Archived from the original
(PDF) on 14 May 2016. Retrieved 14 May 2016.

  Johannes L. Kurz. "Boni in Chinese Sources: Translations of Relevant Texts from the Song
to the Qing Dynasties" (PDF). Universiti Brunei Darussalam. National University of Singapore.
p. 1. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 May 2014. Retrieved 1 June 2014.

  Kerr, George. (2000). Okinawa: The History of an Island People, p. 65., p. 65, at Google
Books

  Shambaugh, David L. et al. (2008). International Relations of Asia, p. 54 n15., p. 54, at


Google Books citing the 1818 Collected Statutes of the Qing Dynasty (DaQing hui-tien)

  "Funan". About.com. Archived from the original on 2007-11-09. Retrieved 2007-06-02.

  "The Kingdom of Funan and Chenla (First to Eighth Century AD)". Archived from the
original on 2006-05-03. Retrieved 2007-06-06.

  Chisholm, Hugh. (1911). The Encyclopædia Britannica, Vol. 15, p. 224, p. 224, at Google
Books

  Yoda, Yoshiie et al. (1996) The Foundations of Japan's Modernization: a Comparison


with China's Path, p. 40., p. 40, at Google Books; excerpt, "While other countries in East Asia
were almost consistently emeshed within the Chinese tribute system, Japan found itself
sometimes inside sometimes outside of the system ...."
  According to the Book of Later Han vol. 85, zh:s:Frédéric Nussbaum, see Deutsche
Nationalbibliothek Authority File Archived 2012-05-24 at archive.today.

  Yoda, p. 40., p. 40, at Google Books; excerpt, "... Japanese missions to the Sui [Dynasty]
(581-604) ... were recognized by the Chinese as bearers of imperial tribute ...."

  Imperial envoys made perilous passages on kentoshi-sen ships to Tang China Archived
2011-01-28 at the Wayback Machine "The cross-cultural exchanges began with 5 missions
between 600 and 614, initially to Sui China (on kenzuishi-sen), and at least 18 or 19 missions
were sent to T'ang China from 630 to 894 although not all of them were designated
kentoshi."

  Book of Sui, vol. 81

  Nussbaum, Louis-Frédéric. (2005). "Kentoshi" in Japan encyclopedia, p. 511, p. 511, at


Google Books; n.b., Louis-Frédéric is pseudonym of Loui

  Fogel, Joshua A. (2009). Articulating the Sinosphere: Sino-Japanese Relations in Space


and Time, pp. 102-107., p. 102, at Google Books

  Yoda, p. 40., p. 40, at Google Books; excerpt, "Japanese missions to the ... Tang
Dynasties were recognized by the Chinese as bearers of imperial tribute; however, in the
middle of the ninth century -- the early Heian Period -- Japan rescinded he sending of
missions to the Tang Empire. Subsequently Japan conducted a flourishing trade with China
and for the next five hundred years also imported much of Chinese culture, while
nevertheless remaining outside the tribute system."

  Edwin O. Reischauer (1955). Ennin's travels in T'ang China: Chapter III - Kentoshi.
ISBN 978-89-460-3814-1

  Old book of Tang, vol. 199

  Fogel, p. 27., p. 27, at Google Books; Goodrich, Luther Carrington et al. (1976).
Dictionary of Ming biography, 1368-1644, p. 1316., p. 1316, at Google Books; note: the
economic benefit of the Sinocentric tribute system was profitable trade. The tally trade
(kangō bōeki or kanhe maoyi in Chinese) was a system devised and monitored by the
Chinese -- see Nussbaum, Louis Frédéric et al. (2005). Japan Encyclopedia, p. 471.

  Frederick W. Mote, Denis Twitchett, John King Fairbank. The Cambridge history of
China: The Ming dynasty, 1368-1644, Part 1, pp. 491-492., p. 491, at Google Books

  Pratt, Keith L. (1999). Korea: a historical and cultural dictionary. p. 482.


ISBN 9780700704637. Archived from the original on 2021-06-22. Retrieved 2021-02-01.

  Kwak, Tae-Hwan et al. (2003). The Korean peace process and the four powers, p. 100.,
p. 100, at Google Books; excerpt, "The tributary relations between China and Korea came to
an end when China was defeated in the Sino-Japanese war of 1894-1895."
  Korea Herald. (2004) Korea now, p. 31; excerpt, "The Chinese also insist that even
though Goguryeo was part of Chinese domain, Silla and Baekje were states subjected to
China's tributary system."

  Seth, Michael J. (2006). A concise history of Korea, p. 64, p. 64, at Google Books;
excerpt, "China found instead that its policy of using trade and cultural exchanges and
offering legitimacy and prestige to the Silla monarchy was effective in keeping Silla safely in
the tributary system. Indeed, the relationship that was worked out in the late seventh and
early eighth centuries can be considered the beginning of the mature tributary relationship
that would characterize Sino-Korean interchange most of the time until the late nineteenth
century;"

  Korean History Project, Unified Silla Archived 2008-11-20 at the Wayback Machine.

  Kwak, p. 99., p. 99, at Google Books; excerpt, "Korea's tributary relations with China
began as early as the fifth century, were regularized during the Goryeo dynasty (918-1392),
and became fully institutionalized during the Yi dynasty (1392-1910)."

  Clark, Donald N. (1998). "The Ming Dynasty 1368-1644 Part 2". The Cambridge History
of China. 8: 280. ISBN 0-521-24333-5. Archived from the original on 2021-09-26. Retrieved
2020-10-18. Between 1392 and 1450, the Choson court dispatched 391 envoys to China: on
average, seven each year.

  Kang, David C. (2010). East Asia Before the West: Five Centuries of Trade and Tribute.
Columbia University Press. p. 59. ISBN 978-0-231-15318-8. Archived from the original on
2021-09-26. Retrieved 2020-10-18. thus, between 1637 and 1881, Korea sent 435 special
embassies to the Qing court, or an average of almost 1.5 embassies per year.

  "Chinese Sui Dynasty annals". Archived from the original on June 27, 2006.

  "Kedah: The Birthplace of Malay Civilisation". www.sabrizain.org. Archived from the


original on 2012-02-04. Retrieved 2012-01-11.

  "Kelantan". Archived from the original on 2012-02-02. Retrieved 2012-01-11.

  "First Ruler of Melaka : Parameswara 1394-1414". Archived from the original on 2013-
06-03. Retrieved 2012-01-11.

  Gundry, "Nepal," pp. 609-610., p. 609, at Google Books

  "The Political Economy of Philippines- China Relations" (PDF). Archived from the original
(PDF) on 2007-06-21. Retrieved 2007-06-08.

  "Tribute and Trade" Archived 2007-09-27 at the Wayback Machine,


KoreanHistoryProject.org. Retrieved on 30-01-2007.

  "The Ancient Ryukyus Period/The Sanzan Period". Archived from the original on 2007-
09-27. Retrieved 2007-06-08.

  Gundry, "Ryūkyū," pp. 615-616., p. 615, at Google Books


  Kerr, George. (2000). Okinawa: The History of an Island People, p. 74., p. 74, at Google
Books

  Kerr, p. 66., p. 66, at Google Books

  Gundry, "Siam," pp. 616-619., p. 616, at Google Books

  Gundry, "Tibet," pp. 610-611., p. 610, at Google Books

  Gundry, "Annam," pp. 613-615., p. 613, at Google Books

  Giovanni Andornino. "Working Papers of the Global Economic History Network (GEHN)
No. 21/06 - The Nature and Linkages of China's Tributary System under the Ming and Qing
Dynasties" (PDF). London School of Economics. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-01-
10. Retrieved 2016-10-31.

  page 63 of the book, "MAPPING HISTORY WORLD HISTORY, by Dr. Ian Barnes. ISBN 978-
1-84573-323-0

  Wolters, "North-western Cambodia in the seventh century", p. 356 and pp. 374–375

  Robert S. Wicks (1992). Money, markets, and trade in early Southeast Asia: the
development of indigenous monetary systems to AD 1400. SEAP Publications. p. 210. ISBN 0-
87727-710-9. Archived from the original on 2021-09-26. Retrieved 2010-06-28.

  Edward H. Schafer (1963). The golden peaches of Samarkand: a study of Tʻang exotics.
University of California Press. p. 50. ISBN 0-520-05462-8. Archived from the original on 2021-
09-26. Retrieved 2011-01-09.

  Михаил Иосифович Сладковский (1981). Тхе лонг роад: Сино-Руссиян экономик


контактс фром анциент тимес то 1917. Прогресс Публишерс. p. 13.
ISBN 9780828521260. Archived from the original on 2021-09-26. Retrieved 2016-04-07.

  Schafer 1963 Archived 2016-04-24 at the Wayback Machine, p. 66.

  Brantly Womack (2006). China and Vietnam: the politics of asymmetry. Cambridge
University Press. p. 121. ISBN 0-521-61834-7. Archived from the original on 2021-09-26.
Retrieved 2010-11-28.

  Richard Bulliet; Pamela Kyle Crossley; Daniel Headrick; Steven Hirsch; Lyman Johnson
(2008). The Earth and Its Peoples: A Global History: to 1550. Cengage Learning. p. 279.
ISBN 978-0-618-99238-6. Archived from the original on 2021-09-26. Retrieved 2010-11-28.

  Lynda Noreen Shaffer, A Concrete Panoply of Intercultural Exchange: Asia in World


History (1997) in Asia in Western and World History, edited by Ainslie T. Embree and Carol
Gluck (Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe), p. 839-840.

  E. Yarshater, ed. (1983-04-14). "Chapter 7, The Iranian Settlements to the East of the
Pamirs". The Cambridge History of Iran. Cambridge University Press. p. 271. ISBN 978-
0521200929. Archived from the original on 2021-09-26. Retrieved 2020-12-15.
  Allsen, Thomas T. (1997). Commodity and Exchange in the Mongol Empire: A Cultural
History of Islamic Textiles. Cambridge University Press. pp. 28–29. ISBN 9780521583015.
Archived from the original on 5 August 2020. Retrieved 8 June 2019.

  Kim, Jinwung (2012). A History of Korea: From "Land of the Morning Calm" to States in
Conflict. Indiana University Press. p. 172. ISBN 9780253000248. Archived from the original on
5 August 2020. Retrieved 8 June 2019.

  Lee, Ki-Baik (1984). A New History of Korea. Harvard University Press. p. 157.
ISBN 9780674615762. Archived from the original on 5 August 2020. Retrieved 8 June 2019.

  Robinson, David M. (2009). Empire's Twilight: Northeast Asia Under the Mongols.
Harvard University Press. p. 49. ISBN 9780674036086. Archived from the original on 5 August
2020. Retrieved 8 June 2019.

  Robinson, David M. (2009). Empire's Twilight: Northeast Asia Under the Mongols.
Harvard University Press. p. 48. ISBN 9780674036086. Archived from the original on 30
December 2019. Retrieved 8 June 2019.

  崔 CUI, 鲜香 Xian-xiang (2010). "高丽女性在高丽与蒙元关系中的作用". Pku Cssci.


Tianjin: 天津师范大学性别与社会发展研究中心 (1). Archived from the original on 2018-07-
06. Retrieved 2018-07-15.

  李, 鹏 (2006). "元代入华高丽女子探析". 广西师范大学. Archived from the original on


2018-07-06. Retrieved 2018-07-15.

  Peter H. Lee (13 August 2013). Sourcebook of Korean Civilization: Volume One: From
Early Times to the 16th Century. Columbia University Press. pp. 681–. ISBN 978-0-231-51529-
0. Archived from the original on 2 September 2016. Retrieved 22 September 2016.

  George Qingzhi Zhao (2008). Marriage as Political Strategy and Cultural Expression:
Mongolian Royal Marriages from World Empire to Yuan Dynasty. Vol. 60 of Asian thought
and culture (illustrated ed.). Peter Lang. p. 182. ISBN 978-1433102752. ISSN 0893-6870.
Archived from the original on 2021-09-26. Retrieved 2020-10-18.

  兰, 阳 (2007). "论元丽联姻及其对高丽的政治影响". 延边大学. Archived from the


original on 2018-07-06.

  George Qingzhi Zhao. Marriage as Political Strategy and Cultural Expression: Mongolian
Royal Marriages from World Empire to Yuan Dynasty.

  John K. Fairbank and Têng Ssu-yü: On the Ch'ing Tributary System, in: Harvard Journal of
Asiatic Studies 6, no. 2 (1941), p. 137-150

  John K. Fairbank and Têng Ssu-yü: On the Ch'ing Tributary System, in: Harvard Journal of
Asiatic Studies 6, no. 2 (1941), p. 150ff
  Edward L. Dreyer (1982). Early Ming China: a political history, 1355-1435. Stanford
University Press. p. 116. ISBN 0-8047-1105-4. Archived from the original on 2021-09-26.
Retrieved 2010-06-28.

  Kang, Jae-eun (2006). The Land of Scholars: Two Thousand Years of Korean
Confucianism. Homa & Sekey Books. p. 179. ISBN 9781931907309. Archived from the original
on 26 September 2021. Retrieved 29 June 2016. "Reciprocating a tribute usually exceeded
the tribute itself, which was a profitable government trade to the small nation but a big
burden for China. Therefore, China requested for Joseon to send tribute only "once every
three years," but in contrast, Joseon requested to send a tribute "thrice each year" or "four
times per year" instead and achieved it."

  Fernquest autumn 2006: 51–52

  E. Bretschneider (1888). Mediæval Researches from Eastern Asiatic Sources: Fragments


Toward the Knowledge of the Geography and History of Central and Western Asia from the
13th to the 17th Century, Volume 2. LONDON: Trübner & Co. p. 291. Archived from the
original on 2021-09-26. Retrieved 2011-06-09.(Original from the New York Public Library)

  Association for Asian Studies. Ming Biographical History Project Committee, Luther
Carrington Goodrich, Chao-ying Fang (1976). Dictionary of Ming biography, 1368-1644.
Columbia University Press. p. 1597. ISBN 0-231-03833-X. Archived from the original on 2021-
09-26. Retrieved 2010-07-04.

  Hugh Dyson Walker (20 November 2012). East Asia: A New History. AuthorHouse.
pp. 259–. ISBN 978-1-4772-6517-8. Archived from the original on 25 December 2019.
Retrieved 26 January 2019.

  Shih-shan Henry Tsai (1996). The eunuchs in the Ming dynasty. SUNY Press. pp. 14–16.
ISBN 0-7914-2687-4. Archived from the original on 2020-03-24. Retrieved 2010-06-28.

  John W. Dardess (2012). Ming China, 1368-1644: A Concise History of a Resilient Empire.
Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 36–. ISBN 978-1-4422-0490-4. Archived from the original on 2019-
12-28. Retrieved 2019-01-26.

  Frederick W. Mote; Denis Twitchett (26 February 1988). The Cambridge History of China:
Volume 7, The Ming Dynasty, 1368-1644. Cambridge University Press. pp. 212–. ISBN 978-0-
521-24332-2. Archived from the original on 28 December 2019. Retrieved 26 January 2019.

  Shih-shan Henry Tsai (1 July 2011). Perpetual happiness: the Ming emperor Yongle.
University of Washington Press. pp. 33–. ISBN 978-0-295-80022-6. Archived from the original
on 26 December 2019. Retrieved 26 January 2019.

  Shih-shan Henry Tsai (1996). The Eunuchs in the Ming Dynasty. SUNY Press. pp. 14–.
ISBN 978-0-7914-2687-6. Archived from the original on 2020-08-05. Retrieved 2019-01-26.

  Association for Asian Studies. Ming Biographical History Project Committee; Luther
Carrington Goodrich; 房兆楹 (January 1976). Dictionary of Ming Biography, 1368-1644.
Columbia University Press. pp. 1363–. ISBN 978-0-231-03833-1. Archived from the original on
2019-12-27. Retrieved 2019-01-26.

  Wang, Yuan-kang (2010). Harmony and War: Confucian Culture and Chinese Power
Politics. Columbia University Press. ISBN 9780231522403. Archived from the original on 22
December 2019. Retrieved 1 July 2019.

  Donald N. Clark. "The Ming Connection: Notes on Korea's Experience In the Chinese
Tributary System". Archived from the original on 2014-01-10. Retrieved 2019-01-26.

  Twitchett, Denis C.; Mote, Frederick W. (1998). The Cambridge History of China: Volume
8, The Ming Dynasty. Cambridge University Press. pp. 283–284. ISBN 9780521243339.
Archived from the original on 8 December 2019. Retrieved 3 July 2019.

  김한규 (1999). 한중관계사 II. 아르케. pp. 581~585. ISBN 89-88791-02-9.

  Wade, Geoff (July 1, 2007). "Ryukyu in the Ming Reign Annals 1380s-1580s" (PDF).
Working Paper Series (93). Asia Research Institute National University of Singapore: 75.
SSRN 1317152. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 September 2009. Retrieved 6 July 2014.

  Kyujanggak Institute for Korean Studies (2011). 조선 사람의 세계여행 (규장각 교양총
서 05) [World Travels of the Joseon People] (in Korean). 글항아리. ISBN 9788967352790.
Archived from the original on 5 August 2020. Retrieved 12 March 2019.

  김운회 (2015). 몽골은 왜 고려를 멸망시키지 않았나 [Why Did Mongolia Not Destroy
Goryeo?] (in Korean). 역사의아침. ISBN 9788993119916. Archived from the original on 5
August 2020. Retrieved 12 March 2019.

  Dardess, John W. (2012). Ming China, 1368-1644: A Concise History of a Resilient


Empire. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 39. ISBN 9781442204904. Archived from the original on 5
August 2020. Retrieved 1 July 2019.

  Twitchett, Denis Crispin; Fairbank, John King (1978). The Cambridge History of China.
Cambridge University Press. p. 301. ISBN 9780521243322. Archived from the original on 5
August 2020. Retrieved 3 July 2019.

  Hua, Hsieh Bao (2014-06-18). Concubinage and Servitude in Late Imperial China.
Lexington Books. p. 285. ISBN 9780739145166. Archived from the original on 2020-08-05.
Retrieved 13 September 2016.

  Watt, James C. Y.; Leidy, Denise Patry (2005). Defining Yongle: Imperial Art in Early
Fifteenth-century China. Metropolitan Museum of Art. p. 12. ISBN 9781588391537. Archived
from the original on 5 August 2020. Retrieved 13 September 2016.

  Mote, Frederick W. (2003). Imperial China 900-1800. Harvard University Press. p. 594.
ISBN 9780674012127. Archived from the original on 5 August 2020. Retrieved 13 September
2016.
  The Taiping Rebellion. M.E. Sharpe. 2001. p. 661. ISBN 9780765619532. Archived from
the original on 5 August 2020. Retrieved 13 September 2016.

  Swope, Kenneth M. (2013-04-29). A Dragon's Head and a Serpent's Tail: Ming China and
the First Great East Asian War, 1592-1598. University of Oklahoma Press. p. 44.
ISBN 9780806185026. Archived from the original on 2020-08-05. Retrieved 13 September
2016.

  Forges, Roger V. Des; Major, John S. (2005). The Asian World, 600-1500. Oxford
University Press. p. 152. ISBN 9780195178432. Archived from the original on 26 September
2021. Retrieved 13 September 2016.

  "Arts of Asia". Arts of Asia Publications. 1 January 2008: 120. Archived from the original
on 26 September 2021. Retrieved 13 September 2016.

  Fogel, Joshua A. (2005). The Teleology of the Modern Nation-state: Japan and China.
University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 209. ISBN 9780812238204. Archived from the original on
26 September 2021. Retrieved 13 September 2016.

  He, Li; Knight, Michael; Vinograd, Richard Ellis; Bartholomew, Terese Tse; Chan, Dany;
Culture, Asian Art Museum--Chong-Moon Lee Center for Asian Art and; Art, Indianapolis
Museum of; Museum, St Louis Art (2008-07-22). Power and glory: court arts of China's Ming
dynasty. Asian Art Museum--Chong-Moon Lee Center for Asian Art and Culture. p. 153.
ISBN 9780939117420. Archived from the original on 2021-09-26. Retrieved 13 September
2016.

  Chase, Kenneth Warren (2003-07-07). Firearms: A Global History to 1700. Cambridge


University Press. p. 47. ISBN 9780521822749. Archived from the original on 2020-08-05.
Retrieved 13 September 2016.

  Tsai, Shih-shan Henry (July 2001). Perpetual Happiness: The Ming Emperor Yongle.
University of Washington Press. p. 20. ISBN 9780295981093. Archived from the original on 5
August 2020. Retrieved 13 September 2016.

  Weidner, Marsha Smith; Berger, Patricia Ann; Art, Helen Foresman Spencer Museum of;
Francisco, Asian Art Museum of San (1994). Latter Days of the Law: Images of Chinese
Buddhism, 850 - 1850; [exhibition, August 27 - October 9 1994 ...]. University of Hawaii Press.
p. 107. ISBN 9780824816629. Archived from the original on 5 August 2020. Retrieved 13
September 2016.

  Dardess, John W. (2012). Ming China, 1368-1644: A Concise History of a Resilient


Empire. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 34. ISBN 9781442204904. Archived from the original on 5
August 2020. Retrieved 13 September 2016.

  Dardess, John W. (2012). Ming China, 1368-1644: A Concise History of a Resilient


Empire. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 39. ISBN 9781442204904. Archived from the original on 5
August 2020. Retrieved 13 September 2016.
  Schirokauer, Conrad; Brown, Miranda (2012-01-06). A Brief History of Chinese
Civilization. Cengage Learning. p. 187. ISBN 978-1133709251. Archived from the original on
2020-08-05. Retrieved 13 September 2016.

  Jay A. Levenson; National Gallery of Art (U.S.) (1991). Circa 1492: Art in the Age of
Exploration. Yale University Press. pp. 477–. ISBN 978-0-300-05167-4. Archived from the
original on 2019-12-31. Retrieved 2019-01-26.

  Bernard O'Kane (15 December 2012). The Civilization of the Islamic World. The Rosen
Publishing Group. pp. 207–. ISBN 978-1-4488-8509-1. Archived from the original on 24
December 2019. Retrieved 26 January 2019.

  "Bonhams Auctioneers : A rare blue and white screen Zhengde six-character mark and of
the period". bonhams.com. Archived from the original on 2016-08-21.

  Oriental Blue and White, London, 1970, p.29.

  Dr. Yeewan Koon. "FINE2055 Crossing Cultures: China and the Outside World" (PDF).
www.fa.hku.hk. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 March 2012. Retrieved 12 January
2022.

  Britannica Educational Publishing (2010). The Culture of China. Britannica Educational


Publishing. pp. 176–. ISBN 978-1-61530-183-6. Archived from the original on 2019-12-07.
Retrieved 2019-01-26.

  Kathleen Kuiper (2010). The Culture of China. The Rosen Publishing Group. pp. 176–.
ISBN 978-1-61530-140-9. Archived from the original on 2019-12-24. Retrieved 2019-01-26.

  Britannica Educational Publishing (1 April 2010). The Culture of China. Britannica


Educational Publishing. pp. 176–. ISBN 978-1-61530-183-6. Archived from the original on 30
December 2019. Retrieved 26 January 2019.

  Suzanne G. Valenstein (1988). A Handbook of Chinese Ceramics. Metropolitan Museum


of Art. pp. 187–. ISBN 978-0-8109-1170-3. Archived from the original on 2019-12-27.
Retrieved 2019-01-26.

  Susan Naquin (16 December 2000). Peking: Temples and City Life, 1400-1900. University
of California Press. pp. 213–. ISBN 978-0-520-92345-4. Archived from the original on 23
December 2019. Retrieved 22 September 2016.

  Association for Asian Studies. Ming Biographical History Project Committee; Luther
Carrington Goodrich; 房兆楹 (1976). Dictionary of Ming Biography, 1368-1644. Columbia
University Press. pp. 309–. ISBN 978-0-231-03801-0. Archived from the original on 2016-09-
02. Retrieved 2016-09-22.

  B. J. ter Haar (2006). Telling Stories: Witchcraft And Scapegoating in Chinese History.
BRILL. pp. 4–. ISBN 90-04-14844-2. Archived from the original on 2020-09-19. Retrieved
2019-01-26.
  Frank Trentmann (22 March 2012). The Oxford Handbook of the History of
Consumption. OUP Oxford. pp. 47–. ISBN 978-0-19-162435-3. Archived from the original on 5
August 2020. Retrieved 13 October 2016.

  John W. Dardess (2012). Ming China, 1368-1644: A Concise History of a Resilient Empire.
Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 47–. ISBN 978-1-4422-0491-1. Archived from the original on 2019-
12-28. Retrieved 2016-09-22.

  Peter C Perdue (30 June 2009). China Marches West: The Qing Conquest of Central
Eurasia. Harvard University Press. pp. 64–. ISBN 978-0-674-04202-5. Archived from the
original on 25 December 2019. Retrieved 22 September 2016.

  Frederick W. Mote (2003). Imperial China 900-1800. Harvard University Press. pp. 657–.
ISBN 978-0-674-01212-7. Archived from the original on 2019-04-08. Retrieved 2016-09-22.

  John K. Fairbank and Têng Ssu-yü: On the Ch'ing Tributary System, in: Harvard Journal of
Asiatic Studies 6, no. 2 (1941), p. 193ff

  LIN, HSIAO-TING (2009-09-09). "The Tributary System in China's Historical Imagination:


China and Hunza, ca. 1760–1960". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society. 19 (4): 489–507.
doi:10.1017/s1356186309990071. ISSN 1356-1863. S2CID 154623203.

  Kang, Jae-un (2006). The land of scholars: two thousand years of Korean Confucianism.
Homa & Sekey Books. ISBN 1-931907-30-7. Archived from the original on 2021-09-26.
Retrieved 2020-10-18. Joseon requested to send a tribute "thrice each year" or "four times
per year" instead and achieved it.

  Robinson, Martin; Bender, Andrew; Whyte, Rob (2004). Korea. Lonely Planet. p. 22.
ISBN 1-74059-449-5. The tribute taken to Beijing three or four times a year during most of
the Joseon period provides an interesting insight into Korean products at this time.

  van Braam Houckgeest, Andreas Everardus. (1797). Voyage de l'ambassade de la


Compagnie des Indes Orientales hollandaises vers l'empereur de la Chine, dans les années
1794 et 1794; see also 1798 English translation: An authentic account of the embassy of the
Dutch East-India company, to the court of the emperor of China, in the years 1974 and 1795,
Vol. I. Archived 2009-02-15 at the Wayback Machine

  de Guignes, Chrétien-Louis-Joseph (1808). Voyage a Pékin, Manille et l'Ile de France.

  Geoffrey C. Gunn (1 August 2011). History Without Borders: The Making of an Asian
World Region, 1000-1800. Hong Kong University Press. pp. 94–. ISBN 978-988-8083-34-3.
Archived from the original on 5 August 2020. Retrieved 29 May 2017.

  Hudson, Alfred E. (Alfred Emmons) (February 21, 1938). "Kazak social structure". Yale
University publications in anthropology (20): 1–109 – via ehrafworldcultures.yale.edu.

  Thackeray, Frank W.; Findling, John E., eds. (2012). Events that formed the modern
world : from the European Renaissance through the War on Terror . Santa Barbara, Calif.:
ABC-CLIO. p. 200. ISBN 978-1598849011. Archived from the original on 2015-09-24.
Retrieved 2020-10-18.

  Hummel, Arthur W., ed. (1991). Eminent Chinese of the Ch'ing period : (1644 - 1912)
(Repr. ed.). Taipei: SMC Publ. p. 217. ISBN 9789576380662.

  Hummel, Arthur W. Sr., ed. (1943). "Dorgon" . Eminent Chinese of the Ch'ing Period.
United States Government Printing Office. p. 217.

  Library of Congress. Orientalia Division (1943). Hummel, Arthur William (ed.). 清代名人
傳略: 1644-1912 (reprint ed.). 經文書局. p. 217. Archived from the original on 2016-10-22.
Retrieved 2016-05-02.

  Wakeman, Frederic Jr. (1985). The great enterprise : the Manchu reconstruction of
imperial order in seventeenth-century China (Book on demand. ed.). Berkeley: University of
California Press. p. 892. ISBN 9780520048041. dorgon korean princess.

  Dawson, Raymond Stanley (1972). Imperial China (illustrated ed.). Hutchinson. p. 275.


ISBN 9780091084806. Archived from the original on 2016-10-22. Retrieved 2016-05-02.

  Dawson, Raymond Stanley (1976). Imperial China (illustrated ed.). Penguin. p. 306.


ISBN 9780140218992. Archived from the original on 2021-07-31. Retrieved 2016-05-02.

  梨大史學會 (Korea) (1968). 梨大史苑, Volume 7. 梨大史學會. p. 105. Archived from


the original on 2016-10-22. Retrieved 2016-05-02.

  "The annals of the Joseon princesses. - The Gachon Herald". www.gachonherald.com.


Archived from the original on 2021-07-23. Retrieved 2016-05-02.

  Kwan, Ling Li. Transl. by David (1995). Son of Heaven (1. ed.). Beijing: Chinese Literature
Press. p. 217. ISBN 9787507102888. Archived from the original on 2016-10-22. Retrieved
2016-05-02.

  Alfred Stead (1901). China and her mysteries. LONDON: Hood, Douglas, & Howard.
p. 100. Retrieved February 19, 2011. burma was a tributary state of china british forward
tribute peking.(Original from the University of California)

141.  William Woodville Rockhill (1905). China's intercourse with Korea from the
XVth century to 1895. LONDON: Luzac & Co. p. 5. Retrieved February 19, 2011.
tribute china.(Colonial period Korea; WWC-5)(Original from the University of
California)

Sources

  This article incorporates text from The National Review, a publication from 1884,
now in the public domain in the United States.
  This article incorporates text from The encyclopædia britannica: a dictionary of
arts, sciences, literature and general information, Volume 15, by Hugh Chisholm, a
publication from 1911, now in the public domain in the United States.
  This article incorporates text from China and her mysteries, by Alfred Stead, a
publication from 1901, now in the public domain in the United States.
  This article incorporates text from China's intercourse with Korea from the XVth
century to 1895, by William Woodville Rockhill, a publication from 1905, now in the
public domain in the United States.
  This article incorporates text from Mediæval Researches from Eastern Asiatic
Sources: Fragments Toward the Knowledge of the Geography and History of Central
and Western Asia from the 13th to the 17th Century, Volume 2, by E. Bretschneider,
a publication from 1888, now in the public domain in the United States.
 van Braam Houckgeest, Andreas Everardus. (1797). Voyage de l'ambassade de la
Compagnie des Indes Orientales hollandaises vers l'empereur de la Chine, dans les
années 1794 et 1795. Philadelphia: M.L.E. Moreau de Saint-Méry.
 _______________. (1798). An authentic account of the embassy of the Dutch East-
India company, to the court of the emperor of China, in the years 1794 and 1795,
Vol. I. London : R. Phillips.
 Fairbank, John K. "Tributary Trade and China's Relations with the West", The Far
Eastern Quarterly (1942). Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 129–149.
 de Guignes, Chrétien-Louis-Joseph. (1808). Voyage a Pékin, Manille et l'Ile de France.
Paris. OCLC 417277650.
 Kang, David C. (2010). East Asia Before the West: Five Centuries of Trade and Tribute.
New York : Columbia University Press. ISBN 9780231153188; OCLC 562768984.
 Kerr, George H. (1965). Okinawa, the History of an Island People. Rutland, Vermont:
C.E. Tuttle Co. OCLC 39242121
 Kwak, Tae-Hwan and Seung-Ho Joo. (2003). The Korean peace process and the four
powers. Burlington, Vermont: Ashgate. ISBN 9780754636533; OCLC 156055048
 Korea Herald. (2004) Korea now. Seoul: Korea Herald. ISSN 1739-225X; OCLC
43438924 Archived 2016-04-04 at the Wayback Machine.
 Nussbaum, Louis Frédéric and Käthe Roth. (2005). Japan Encyclopedia. Cambridge:
Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-01753-5; OCLC 48943301.
 Pratt, Keith L., Richard Rutt, and James Hoare. (1999). Korea : a historical and
cultural dictionary, Richmond: Curzon Press. ISBN 9780700704637; ISBN 978-0-7007-
0464-4; OCLC 245844259.
 Seth, Michael J. (2006). A concise history of Korea: from the neolithic period through
the nineteenth century. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
ISBN 9780742540040; OCLC 65407346.
 Wang, Zhenping. (2005). Ambassadors from the islands of immortals: China-Japan
relations in the Han-Tang period. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
ISBN 9780824828714; OCLC 260081991.

External links

You might also like