Coleman KM 2008 - Neocollagenesis After Injection of Calcium Hydroxylapatite Composition in A Canine Model

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Neocollagenesis after Injection of Calcium Hydroxylapatite

Composition in a Canine Model


KYLE M. COLEMAN, MD, ROBERT VOIGTS, MS,y DALE P. DEVORE, PHD,y PAUL TERMIN, DVM, PHD,z
y
AND WILLIAM P. COLEMAN, III, MD

Dale DeVore and Robert Voigts are employees of BioForm. This study was conducted at, and funded by,
BioForm Medical Inc.

T he ability of soft tissue fillers to induce neo-


collagenesis is a concept emerging in impor-
tance in predicting longevity of filler injections. Over
Animal Care and Use Convention). The animals
were injected lateral to the lumbar spine. One side
on each animal was injected in a linear pattern
the past three decades, an increased demand for skin with 0.2 to 0.3 cm3 of calcium hydroxylapatite
rejuvenation and wrinkle correction has led to the subdermally; the opposite side was injected in a
development of a diverse set of cosmetic skin fillers. similar manner but intradermally. Each animal was
With recent evidence showing that hyaluronic acid randomly assigned to a study interval of 4, 16, 24,
filler can lead to fibroblast cell changes indicative of 32, 52, or 78 weeks. At the predetermined interval,
possible endogenous production of collagen, it is the animals were euthanized by intravenous injection
important to see if similar responses are found with of sodium pentobarbital, and each injection site was
different fillers. Investigators sought to determine if excised, fixed in 10% formalin, and submitted for
injection of Radiesse (calcium hydroxylapatite; pathologic evaluation. At explant, each tissue sample
BioForm Medical Inc., San Mateo, CA) can lead to was grossly evaluated for the presence of capsule
neocollagenesis over time in a canine model. formation prior to submission for histologic
analysis.
Radiesse was approved by the US Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) in December of 2006 for The pathologist was blinded to the time interval of
correction of facial wrinkles and folds and for hu- the sample during interpretations. Collagen content
man immunodeficiency virus–associated facial was quantified using picrosirius red (PSR) staining
wasting.1 The product is composed of approximately under polarized light with photometric analysis. PSR
30% calcium hydroxylapatite and 70% carrier gel.2 was selected for the evaluation of collagen content as
The clinical effects of calcium hydroxylapatite in- routine formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues
jections have been reported to last from 12 months stained with PSR has been shown to bind to collagen
to greater than 3 years, and this material has been and then exhibit a bright refractile appearance when
used worldwide in greater than 100,000 patients.2–6 transilluminated with a plane polarized light and
viewed using crossed polarizers.7,8
Six animals were obtained through a US Department
of Agriculture (USDA)-licensed supplier. Approval PSR-stained sections were reviewed and appropriate
for animal use in scientific investigation was ob- fields of view were selected based on the following
tained through a divisional IACUC (International criteria:

Division of Dermatology, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana; yBioForm Medical Inc.,
Franksville, Wisconsin; zLincoln Associates Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota; yTulane University Health Sciences Center,
New Orleans, Louisiana

& 2008 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc.  Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 
ISSN: 1076-0512  Dermatol Surg 2008;34:S53–S55  DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34243.x

S53
N E O C O L L A G E N E S I S A F T E R I N J E C T I O N O F C A L C I U M H Y D R O X Y L A PAT I T E

Figure 1. Picture representation of photometric analysis (Week 4 sample). (A) Histochemical stain with PSR. (B) Under
polarized light. (C) After photometric grayscale change. Original magnification,  40.

1. The study material filled the entire field of tive samples from each time interval after staining
view. with PSR.

2. Collagenous features including fascial tissues planes


In this animal study, it was observed that skin spec-
were a minor constituent within the field of view.
imens injected with calcium hydroxylapatite dem-
Image analysis was standardized within the features onstrated an increased density of host collagen over
of Adobe PhotoShop 5.5 to convert the color pho- time. The intradermal injections led to a larger in-
tomicrograph into a posterized image comprised of crease in collagen content than subdermal injections
black or white pixels. The percentage of both black exhibited. Although these calculations are not
and white pixels, with the white pixels being the strictly quantitative, they are quantitative deriva-
refractile collagen and the black pixels being all tions of qualitative results. The Week 4 values mea-
other non–collagen-containing areas, was then sured were higher than those of the Week 16; this
determined. Representative pictures of this technique initially high percentage of collagen may be due to
are seen in Figure 1. scar formation or tissue swelling. Collagen content
then increased in a more stepwise manner consistent
All animals evaluated showed only minimal irrita- with neocollagenesis.
tion at the injection sites. No capsule formation was
seen in any of the specimens obtained. After injection Many different mechanisms of increased collagen
of calcium hydroxylapatite, increased collagen was production by tissues have been described including
seen over the time interval of 4 to 78 weeks. Results fibroblast stretch, localized destruction, and in-
can be seen in Figure 2. Figure 3 shows representa- creased cytokine production such as transforming
growth factor-b.9–14 More study is needed as to
40.00
Intradermal which mechanism predominates with use of soft
Subdermal
35.00 tissue fillers.
30.00

25.00 The limitations of this pilot study are the small


%collagen

number of animals, the use of a nonhuman model,


20.00
and the fact that no baseline collagen contents were
15.00 obtained and that only trends were observed. Be-
10.00 cause of the small size of the study sample, no sta-
5.00 tistical significance was able to be calculated.
Pretreatment assessments and larger sample size may
0.00
help to explain the relatively high collagen content at
11

18

25

46

53

74

81
32

39

60

67
4

weeks the Week 4 sampling compared to the following


Figure 2. Percentage of collagen present over observation
weeks. Although more studies are needed to deter-
intervals. mine if similar results occur in vivo in humans, in-

S54 D E R M AT O L O G I C S U R G E RY
COLEMAN ET AL

Figure 3. Representative photographs of PSR-stained histologic specimens. (A) 4 weeks; (B) 16 weeks; (C) 24 weeks; (D) 32
weeks; (E) 52 weeks; (F) 78 weeks. Original magnification, A and B,  40; C-F,  60.

jections of calcium hydroxylapatite led to endoge- 6. Jacovella PF, Peiretti CB, Cunille DR, et al. Long lasting results
with hydroxylapatite facial filler. J Plast Reconstr Surg
nous collagen production in a canine model. This is
2006;118:15S–21S.
an important observation because local tissue atro-
7. Dayan D, Hiss Y, Hirshberg A, et al. Are the polarization colors of
phy and aging facial folds are partially caused by picrosirius red-stained collagen determined only by the diameter
decreased collagen density and increased collagen of the fibers? Histochemistry 1989;93:27–9.

fragmentation.15,16 The dermal injections produced 8. Borges LF, Gutierrez PS, Marana HR, Taboga SR Picrosirius-po-
larization staining method as an efficient histopathological tool
greater results than the subcutaneous injections did. for collagenolysis detection in vesical prolapse lesions. Micron
It is important to note that calcium hydroxylapatite 2007;38:580–3.
is indicated for injection at the dermal–subcutaneous 9. Zhou LJ, Ono I, Kaneko F. Role of transforming growth factor-
junction and that dermal injections may lead to beta 1 in fibroblasts derived from normal and hypertrophic
scarred skin. Arch Dermatol Res 1997;289:646–52.
nodularity. Whether increased collagen content can
10. Shannon DB, McKeown ST, Lundy FT, Chris RI. Phenotypic
produce improved clinical results is not known. differences between oral and skin fibroblasts in wound contrac-
However, we hypothesize that, due to neocollagen- tion and growth factor expression. Wound Repair Regen
2006;14:172–8.
esis, calcium hydroxylapatite injections may lead to
11. Tran KT, Griffith L, Wells A. Extracellular matrix signaling
longer lasting clinical results.
through growth factor receptors during wound healing. Wound
Repair Regen 2004;12:262–8.

References 12. Sarasa-Renedo A, Chiquet M. Mechanical signals regulating ex-


tracellular matrix gene expression in fibroblasts. Scand J Med Sci
1. Silvers SL, Eviatar JA, Echavez MI, Pappas AL. Prospective open Sports 2005;15:223–30.
label 18-month trial of calcium hydroxylapatite (Radiesse) for
13. Balestrini JL, Billiar KL. Equibiaxial cyclic stretch stimulates fi-
facial soft tissue augmentation in patients with HIV-associated
broblasts to rapidly remodel fibrin. J Biomech 2006;39:2983–90.
lipoatrophy: one year durability. J Plast Reconstr Surg
2006;118:34S–45S. 14. Grinnell F. Fibroblast biology in three-dimensional collagen ma-
trices. Trends Cell Biol 2003;13:264–9.
2. Internet homepage. Available at www.Radiesse.com (accessed
August 20, 2007). 15. Baumann L. Skin ageing and its treatment. J Pathol
2007;211:241–51.
3. Narins RS, Bowman PH. Injectable skin fillers. Clin Plast Surg
2005;32:151–62. 16. Broder KW, Cohen SR. An overview of permanent and semiper-
manent fillers. J Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:7S–14S.
4. Marmur ES, Phelps R, Goldberg DJ. Clinical, histologic and
electron microscopic findings after injection of a calcium hyd-
roxylapatite filler. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2004;6:223–6. Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Kyle M.
5. Jansen DA, Graivier MH. Evaluation of a calcium hydroylapatite- Coleman, MD, Resident, Division of Dermatology, Tulane
based implant (Radiesse) for facial soft-tissue augmentation. J University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA
Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:22S–30S, discussion 31S–33S. 70112, or e-mail: kmcoleman@hotmail.com

3 4 : S 1 : J A N U A RY 2 0 0 8 S55

You might also like