Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Environment: Writing Skills
Environment: Writing Skills
Learning outcomes
This lesson will support the achievement of Course Learning Outcomes: 3 and 7:
• Produce a range of written texts which demonstrate awareness of genre-related features
and established academic conventions.
• Demonstrate critical thinking skills by analysing ideas, evaluating alternative views, making
criterion-based judgments, and searching for well-informed answers to self-generated
questions.
Task 1
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
There are several factors that are known to contribute to the incidence of plagiarism in Australian
tertiary institutions. Many students, for example, may commit acts of plagiarism unintentionally
simply because they are not fully aware of Australian referencing conventions. This is a view
supported by Kimura (2013) who notes that, in Japanese universities, in-text referencing may not be
necessary if source materials are clearly cited in the bibliographical section. Moreover, despite the
best of intentions, some students may lack the skills required to effectively paraphrase and
synthesise information from original source materials. Very often, they think that making minor
modifications to external work is enough to make their response original. Intentional plagiarism, on
the other hand, is a far more serious issue. It includes the conscious copying of the work of others
and submitting it as the author’s own. According to Jones (2016), it is often a product of study
related stress, the desire to cut corners, and the fear of failure. Regardless of these reasons, the
consequences of plagiarism can be detrimental for all concerned as it undermines academic
integrity and can damage a student’s academic standing. In light of this, appropriate strategies to
address this issue should be considered.
One pragmatic strategy for lowering the incidence of accidental plagiarism is to adopt approaches
that raise awareness and develop proper referencing capacity among students. Promoting clear
referencing guidelines and offering academic literacy training, for instance, may help to achieve this
goal. In support of this, Stevens and McKenzie (2013, p. 52) found that most participants in their
‘Plagiarism Awareness Program’ considered the course “very useful” in addressing the root causes
associated with some forms of plagiarism. Raising student awareness about plagiarism can also be
achieved by designing online academic integrity modules, which can be made compulsory parts of
the courses. According to Belter (2009), after the completion of such modules, the occurrence of
Introduction paragraph
• Orientation • Plagiarism increasing due to blended/online learning
Contextualise the topic
within a general trend
• Definition • Copying ideas – no acknowledgement
Conclusion paragraph
• Restate the
• Restate
problem
• Summarise the • Summary
solutions • Future – undermine quality of tertiary system overall
• Make a
suggestion / issue
a warning /
summarise effects
Below are three of the sources that were used in the Plagiarism essay.
1. Locate in-text citations for these three sources in the essay and highlight the sentences
which contain information that was taken from these sources.
2. Compare these sentences with the original sources extracts.
3. Explain how the writer has paraphrased and integrated information from the sources.
Source 1:
Stevens, T & McKenzie, P 2013. ‘Plagiarism prevention: The University of Brighton experience’,
Modern Librarian, vol. 27, p. 52.
10%
Very useful Quite useful
23% 58%
Not very useful Not useful at all
Time pressure
and study
anxiety
Lack of Weak
awareness academic skills
Source 3:
Kimura, K 2013, ‘Plagiarism and overseas students: Is it really a product of culture?’ TESOL
Journal International, vol. 7, no. 3, p. 86.
Hence, while one educational practice may consider a certain act as normal, another
educational practice may see the same act as wrong. For example, my experience and my
student’s experience in writing essays in Japanese universities show that it is acceptable for
students to give a full list bibliography at the end of their essays without having to provide
in-text references to the readings they use. This way of presenting ideas is not considered
plagiarism, at least at the undergraduate level, as long as students acknowledge all the
authors whose ideas they have referred to in the bibliography.
• Introduction paragraph
• Problem Analysis paragraph + 2 sources
• First solution paragraph + 1 source
• Second solution paragraph + 1 source
This practice will prepare you for your writing assessment AES09.
You can refer to ideas from the essay at the end of this lesson. Include the following in your
discussion:
• Current trends associated with this topic
• Causes
• Effects
• Potential solutions (consider both the strengths and limitations of various solutions)
Write an essay plan using the template and include the in-text citations for 4 sources you intend
to use. The essay plan must be submitted to Moodle by the end of Week 12.
References
Gillett, A 2020, Academic writing: Rhetorical functions in academic writing, Using English for Academic
Purposes, accessed 23 June 2020, <http://www.uefap.net/writing/writing-functions/writing-
functions-16-reasons>.
Introduction paragraph
• Orientation
➢ Introduce the topic of the essay
➢ Contextualise the topic within a general trend
➢ Highlight the central issue
• Purpose statement
o This essay will analyse the problem of X and evaluate viable solutions.
o This essay will evaluate possible solutions to the problem of X.
• Outline / scope
o It will examine / focus on…
Body paragraph 1
• Situational analysis
➢ Identify the causes and effects of the problem.
Conclusion paragraph
• Restate the problem
o In conclusion, X is a significant problem facing…
• Summarise the solutions
o X and Y may be effective alleviation strategies because…
• Make a suggestion / issue a warning / summarise effects
o In order to implement these strategies effectively…
o Failure to take action may result in…
The increasing amount of marine plastic waste has detrimental outcomes. As plastic is a cheap and
convenient material, its use has grown exponentially in products such as packaging for food and drink. For
example, around one million plastic drink containers are bought each minute, and less than half of these are
recycled (Trowsdale, Housden & Meier 2017). These plastics can end up in the ocean if populations close to
coastlines mismanage their waste processes. In reference to this, Jambeck et al. (2015) report that around 8
million tonnes of plastic enter the ocean annually due to littering and mismanagement. This plastic can
adversely affect marine creatures, which may drown when entangled in plastic debris or become unwell
when ingesting microplastics. As White (2016) points out, these microplastics can then enter the food chain
and cause concerns for human health. For these reasons, solutions are urgently needed to reduce the
damage from plastics in the ocean.
One strategy to address ocean plastic pollution is to invest in research and development of cost-effective
biodegradable or plant-based plastics. This could be achieved by awarding government grants to
researchers working in this area. This would allow for the continued use of highly useful plastic products,
while mitigating their damaging effects. One concern in implementing this strategy is that it does not aim to
change behaviour and may facilitate the continued overuse of plastic items. However, plastic is a useful
material that cannot realistically be eliminated and, as Van Sebille, Spathi and Gilbert (2016) claim, the
current focus should be on creating plastic that decomposes fast in the natural environment. Supporting
research which pursues green plastic alternatives can largely reduce the current negative environmental
impact caused by plastic. Therefore, since plastic will inevitably continue to enter the ocean, technologies
that mitigate the impact of this plastic are needed in conjunction with behaviour change.
In order to achieve this behaviour change, another strategy is to institute legislation that aims to minimise
the use of single-use plastics and fishing lines. The European Parliament (2018) has proposed such a
measure, including the banning of single-use plastics that have alternative material options, such as cotton
bud sticks, cutlery and straws. This legislation should be combined with strict guidelines on the
administration of plastic management processes and harsh fines for non-compliance. Since plastic is a
global issue with ocean currents carrying plastic debris worldwide, the legislation suggested by the EU
should be implemented at the UN level as an international law in order to be effective. It must be
acknowledged that many global legislative decisions require agreement and collaboration of all involved,
which can be lengthy processes. However, since environmental issues have reached international political
agenda with great urgency, there have been considerable efforts to expedite legal processes through
treaties rather than customary laws. This is promising as it can potentially alleviate the problem of plastic
pollution through swift and united global action.