1. Rapid urbanization in Kenya has outpaced the development of adequate and affordable housing, especially for low-income earners. Only 20% of new housing units target low-income households despite their needs.
2. The study aims to understand the housing preferences and willingness to pay for homeownership among low-income tenants in Mathare North, Nairobi. It also examines which housing and neighborhood qualities are most important to them.
3. The results could inform effective policy solutions to increase affordable housing and homeownership rates for low-income groups in Kenya, where a significant gap remains between policy goals and outcomes.
1. Rapid urbanization in Kenya has outpaced the development of adequate and affordable housing, especially for low-income earners. Only 20% of new housing units target low-income households despite their needs.
2. The study aims to understand the housing preferences and willingness to pay for homeownership among low-income tenants in Mathare North, Nairobi. It also examines which housing and neighborhood qualities are most important to them.
3. The results could inform effective policy solutions to increase affordable housing and homeownership rates for low-income groups in Kenya, where a significant gap remains between policy goals and outcomes.
1. Rapid urbanization in Kenya has outpaced the development of adequate and affordable housing, especially for low-income earners. Only 20% of new housing units target low-income households despite their needs.
2. The study aims to understand the housing preferences and willingness to pay for homeownership among low-income tenants in Mathare North, Nairobi. It also examines which housing and neighborhood qualities are most important to them.
3. The results could inform effective policy solutions to increase affordable housing and homeownership rates for low-income groups in Kenya, where a significant gap remains between policy goals and outcomes.
ASSESSING THE IMPACT ON HOUSING PREFERENCES OF LOW-INCOME
TENANT HOUSEHOLD .CASE STUDY OF MATHARE NORTH,NAIROBI.
1.0 INTRODUCTION The urban population in Kenya has been growing fast. This demographic growth is often accompanied by physical expansion of the centres to include what were formerly peri-urban areas into the realm of urban administration. For example, while in 1969 there were 48 urban centres (defined as centres with 2000 inhabitants) with a total population of 1.08 million, or about 10% of the total national population, these increased to 91 in 1979 with a total population of 2.3 million, or about 15% of the national population. In 1989 there were 172 urban centres with a population of 4 million, or about 17.6% of the estimated national population of 22.7 million. This rapid growth has placed a strain on the capacity of the urban authorities to provide required basic infrastructure and urban services. Urban migration has increased, municipal boundaries have expanded, but service standards have stagnated and per capita urban expenditures have typically declined. Most urban immigrants are poor and lack marketable skills. They therefore end up unemployed, or operate as hawkers, petty traders, casual labourers, semi-skilled and unskilled with no permanent source of income. With the present scenario, market forces tend to operate against the majority of the urban residents, where in effect over 40% of Nairobi's residents cannot afford a minimum conventional dwelling unit. Other towns with less resources than Nairobi find up to 80% of their inhabitants marginalized in obtaining access to housing and other services. Although the basic infrastructure and services are often considered sectorally, it should be recognized that a housing project for instance, includes local infrastructure including roads, water, sanitation, waste disposal, energy, etc. When urban authorities fail to devise appropriate means for the majority urban poor to get access to housing, they invariably deny them all the support services that go with housing. While it is true that local authorities and the central government have a weak revenue base arising from both the national and international economic situation, it is equally true that efforts by other agencies or even by the poor themselves to provide access to selected urban services is hampered by public policies. The planning regulations, the building by-laws, monetary and fiscal measures atc are among some of the public regulatory policies that militate against the private sector, NGOs, CBOs or individuals to provide legal affordable housing facilities and services to the vulnerable groups. These policy instruments have lead to high costs of built environment relative to the income of urban residents, who have increasingly become marginalized. 1.1 BACKGROUND It is clear that the vast majority of cities in emerging nations are going urbanization. Urbanization is partially brought on by both natural urban population growth and rural-to-urban migration. According to the Kenyan population census report from 2009, the majority of households (74.9%) in urban areas rent their homes, whereas the majority of households (87.3%) in rural regions own their homes, the majority of which were built using the self-help technique. In Nairobi, just 18% of people own their homes, compared to 82% of renters. Low-income households1 who predominately live in the Eastern region of Nairobi city make up the majority of individuals who rent houses. There are an estimated 20,000 housing units available in Nairobi City per year, which leaves a surplus of 80,000 housing units in the city. Only 20% of newly built housing units are aimed at low-income households, with the majority (80%) being high-income. Despite government intervention over the past 10 years, there hasn't been a noticeable increase in the availability of affordable housing. The Kenyan government is now evaluating the 2004 Housing Policy document, which is meant to serve as a roadmap for helping low-income people find decent, cost-effective housing. In its Second Medium Plan (2013 to 2018), the Kenyan government has included a variety of programs aimed at closing the gap between the supply and demand of affordable housing. Adoption subsidies and regulations are some of the approaches planned.
1.2 PROBLEM STATEMENT
Rapid urbanization has made it extremely difficult for low-income people to find accommodation. Due to suppliers' low incentive goals vs larger profit margins in the high income market, there is less investment in low income housing. Low income people are now unable to afford to purchase the socially desirable home because of rising housing costs. Despite government efforts to address the issue, low-income earners'3 access to housing has not been successful. Lack of thorough research on the preferences of low-income households has resulted in the implementation of ineffective policy solutions that may effectively solve housing issues. This study will research low-income households' choices for housing and their readiness to pay for particular dwelling features, as well as their interests and preferences in regard to housing and local features. In order to address low homeownership and other housing issues impacting low income households, the study will enable the formulation of effective policy solutions.
1.3 Research objective
The main goal of this study is to shed light on two aspects of housing preferences: the socioeconomic and financial situation of low-income tenant households and their willingness to pay for home ownership in the study area[ MATHARE NORTH); additionally, the study will delve into the priorities and preferences of the households taking into account both housing and neighborhood characteristics. 1.4 Research questions What are the housing preferences of a group of low-income households in the research region, in order to fulfill the aforementioned objectives? What qualities of home and the surrounding area are most important to them? What types of legislative initiatives are necessary to encourage home ownership and solve housing issues affecting low-income renter households? 1.5 study assumption It was assumed during the course of this research that: I. The information obtained from respondents is accurate, and the key informants provided accurate information to the best of their ability. II. The sample size is appropriate for the study area.
1.6 study justification
Whereas many argue that a number of studies have been carried out in the area of housing for low-income groups, it is worth noting that scarce material s and knowledge exist in the area of policy and institutional framework through which implementation of such programmes takes place. In Kenya, like man y other developing countries, the discrepancy between policy objective of housing the low-income group s and outcome is reflected in the growth of unplanned settlements. In this respect, a number- of studies has been carried out with an aim of availing relevant information. Most of these studies have concentrate d either on policy or implementation , and have made very marginal attempt s SO IDS/WP 485 to merge the two as a process like this stud y intend s to do . Besides, urban area s are constantly changing and hence the constant nee d to avail fresh data which is necessary for policymaking and/or review as well as planning. Above all, my persona l desire to explain some of the persistent housing problem s of the urban low income groups, has greatly contributed to the conceptualization of this study. In Kenya, the continued housing crisis inspie of a number of housing programmes aimed at low- income groups, demand s that an evaluation of this phenomenon be made. 1,7 ORGANIZATION FOR STUDY First Chapter: Introduction The backdrop of the problem, the problem statement, the study objectives, the assumptions, the importance, the rationale, the scope, and the limits are often included in this section, which contextualizes the whole research. It specifies the subject and the region of interest. Second chapter: literature review The chapter covers a survey of the institutional and legislative frameworks, case studies, global and local views, theoretical, and conceptual works on renewal. frameworks. It provides a thorough critique of the advantages and disadvantages of urban redevelopment as well as potential strategies for effective urban renewal. Chapter 3: Research techniques It discusses the research's methodology, approach, and design. The procedures for sampling and data gathering are also described. The work plan timetable, total study budget, and the technique of data processing and presentation are all included in this part. Fourth Chapter: Study Area The location and setting of the region, MATHARE NORTH historical evolution, the legal and institutional structure that governs renewal, physiographic qualities, and environmental circumstances are the main topics of this chapter. It provides information on site inventory, the neighborhood's current structural layout, and renewal. Data analysis and discussion in Chapter 5 Graphs, pie charts, and tables are used to portray the data after it has been examined in accordance with the study's goals. The SWOT analysis of the research field is included in the discussion of the data.
Chapter 6: Concluding remarks and suggestions
Theoretical, methodological, practical, and overall study results are presented in this chapter's concluding section. Additionally, it offers suggestions for planning ideas, an implementation matrix, and topics for more investigation. 1.8 defination terms Keywords: housing, housing affordability, informal housing, price-to-income ratio, land use regulations, global monitoring.
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction In this chapter, researcher will describe succinctly the study area, and into a number of literature relating to my research topic. It includes but not limited to description of the study area, studies on low income housing, low income neighborhoods, challenges facing low income households and home-ownership. Global perspective housing affordability in cities the world over based on data from the Land and Housing Survey in a Global Sample of Cities. We report on the composition of the housing sector across a 200-city sample and develop two measures of housing affordability: occupant affordability – a sector- wide measure of the relative housing affordability for the typical household that occupies a specific dwelling, whether in the formal, informal, private or public housing sectors, and median affordability – a measure of the ability of the median income household in a given city to acquire a typical unit in the formal private housing sector. We also develop an OLS model that explains the variation in housing affordability and shows the effects of population size, urban extent density, land supply regulatory restrictions, and the presence of informal and public housing, on the overall city housing affordability. 2.2Neighborhoods with low incomes In metropolitan regions, households are geographically arranged according to their socioeconomic class, race, and ethnicity. According to Alba and Logan's research, socioeconomic status has an impact on the patterns and geometries of a residential neighborhood in a city. It is clear that low-wage individuals live in impoverished areas because they are unable to afford the housing units offered in middle- and high-income areas. In their study on urban housing, Glaeser, Kahn, and Rappaport (2000) discovered that low- income people prefer to live near to the city cores. Public services may be provided to this group in a favorable manner, according to the argument that politics is to blame for this conduct. According to Mayer and Jencks (1989), the main cause of the marginalization of low-income families is thought to be the spatial segregation of homes with different socioeconomic statuses. Poor people are not given access to high-quality public services and community resources. In Nairobi, and more especially in the study area of MATHARE NORTH, the circumstance is rather typical. Poor neighborhoods have been exacerbated by the government's over dependence on local property taxes to pay for public services. Because they can afford them, wealthy areas frequently receive high-quality public amenities. communities with due of their I comparatively condemned with subpar public services. According to Turner and Wolman (2005), the existence of political borders within a city is a sign that the region has been recognized as a distinct residential spatial unit with unique characteristics. In this sense, spatial residential units have characteristics that would draw a certain demographic to their local areas. For instance, in this study's study region (MATHARE NORTH, in Nairobi), low income residents are concentrated in large numbers, and the location is known to draw low income residents. 2.2 Nairobi's low-income residential area has a long history. In Nairobi, urban segregation has existed and is a legacy of the colonial era. It is acknowledged that before to 1963, Nairobi people lived under a colonial government policy of geographical segregation that racially divided the country. The garden city concept was the urban planning strategy used by the colonial authority. The approach made sure that the city's development followed the trajectory of its economy. With this concept, African immigration to the city was restricted to certain residential regions, preventing urban expansion. Those who worked in the city's administrative, commercial, and industrial sections were given a lot to live on (Stren, 1978). This was accomplished by dividing residential settlements according to race, which led to the settlement of Europeans on the northwestern and western parts, Asians on the southern parts, and Africans being forced to live in the eastern parts, which were known for their high population density and subpar public services (Salau, 1988). Despite Kenya gaining independence from the colonial administration, Werlin (1974) claims that Nairobi city still has unique and different residential areas for European, Asian, and African inhabitants. Akumu and Olima (2007) made the additional observation that once Kenya achieved independence, restrictions on locals migrating into the city were relaxed, which caused an inflow of natives into the city. demand for few is high People were spatially sorted according to their capacity to afford desired dwelling in a particular neighborhood as a result of the availability of housing. Low-income individuals are largely clustered in the Eastern region (where Africans had previously resided in the colonial rule). The MATHERE NORTH study area is a remarkable low-income community in Nairobi, where over 95% of families are renters (Nairobi City Council, 2012). Inadequate housing stock conditions, undesirable neighborhoods, and generally poor public infrastructure are characteristics of the residential region. CASE STUDY TIANJIN
Tianjin is an eco-city that was developed to create an environment-friendly, energy-
efficient, and economically viable area for future generations. It is the second- largest government-to government project between Singapore and China and was piloted in 2007. Design principles
➢ Ecological initiatives such as rehabilitation of 2.6 km wastewater pond
➢ Research in green development ➢ Development of green buildings ➢ Tapping renewable energy sources such as wind, solar and geothermal ➢ Promoting green transport ➢ Provision of common spaces for residents to promote cohesion ➢ Provision of public and social amenities within walking distance of residential estates ➢ Energy-efficient technology ➢ Employment in culture creativity and Information communication technology ➢ Energy conscience environmental conservation