Professional Documents
Culture Documents
03 Coherent Detection-1
03 Coherent Detection-1
03 Coherent Detection-1
Coherent detection
Homodyne detection
Heterodyne detection
BER
Multichannel systems
WDM systems
TDM
Access Networks
There are two optical fiber communication systems: IM/DD systems and coherent
systems.
IM/DD (Intensity modulation and direct detection) systems used intensity modulation of
semiconductor lasers, and the intensity of the optical signal transmitted through an
optical fiber was detected by a photodiode, which acted as a square-law detector. This
combination of transmitter and receiver is widely employed in optical communication
even today. The IM/DD scheme has a significant advantage in that the receiver
sensitivity is dependent neither on the carrier phase nor on the state of polarization
(SOP) of the incoming signal, which randomly fluctuate in real systems.
The photocurrent at the output of the photodiode is proportional to the square of the
signal amplitude:
𝐼𝐼𝐷 𝑡 ∝ 𝐸𝑠 𝐸𝑠′ = 𝐴𝑠 𝑒 𝑗 𝜔𝑠 𝑡+𝜙𝑠 𝐴′𝑠 𝑒 −𝑗 𝜔𝑠 𝑡+𝜙𝑠 = 𝐴2𝑠
Incoming signal
Photodetector
This results in loss of phase information, and is therefore unsuitable for advanced
modulation formats that use the phase dimension to encode data information.
A receiver, in which the signal is interfered with a local oscillator (LO) so as to extract the
phase information of the signal, is called a coherent receiver.
The transmitted optical signal is combined coherently with the continuous wave from
the narrow-linewidth LO laser, so that the detected optical intensity in the photodiode
(PD) ends can be increased and the phase information of the optical signal can be
obtained. The use of LO laser is to increase the receiver sensitivity of the detection of
optical signals, and the performance of coherent transmission can even behave close
to the Shannon limit.
If the input signal has an amplitude given by
𝐸𝑠 𝑡 = 𝐴𝑠 𝑒 𝑗(𝜔𝑠 𝑡+𝜙𝑠 )
and the local oscillator amplitude is given by
𝐸𝑙𝑜 𝑡 = 𝐴𝑙𝑜 𝑒 𝑗(𝜔𝑙𝑜𝑡+𝜙𝑙𝑜)
𝐸𝑙𝑜 𝑡
𝐴𝑠 𝐴𝑙𝑜 ′ 𝑒 𝑗(𝜔𝑠 𝑡+𝜙𝑠 ) 𝑒 −𝑗 𝜔𝑙𝑜 𝑡+𝜙𝑙𝑜 + 𝐴𝑙𝑜 𝐴𝑠 ′ 𝑒 𝑗 𝜔𝑙𝑜 𝑡+𝜙𝑙𝑜 𝑒 −𝑗(𝜔𝑠 𝑡+𝜙𝑠 )
= 𝑅𝑒 2 𝐴𝑠 𝐴′𝑙𝑜 𝑒 𝑗(𝜔𝑠 𝑡+𝜙𝑠 ) 𝑒 −𝑗 𝜔𝑙𝑜 𝑡+𝜙𝑙𝑜
= 𝑅𝑒 {2𝐴𝑠 𝐴′𝑙𝑜 cos(−𝜔𝑙𝑜 + 𝜙𝑠 − 𝜙𝑙𝑜 )} + 𝑗 2𝐴𝑠 𝐴𝑙𝑜 ′𝑠𝑖𝑛(−𝜔𝑙𝑜 + −𝜙𝑙𝑜 )
= 2𝐴𝑠 𝐴𝑙𝑜 ′ 𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝜔𝑠 − 𝜔𝑙𝑜 + 𝜙𝑠 − 𝜙𝑙𝑜
𝑘 𝐴𝑠 2 𝑘 𝐴𝑙𝑜 2
where 𝑃𝑠 = , 𝑃𝑙𝑜 =
2 2
𝑆𝑒𝑓𝑓
k= 𝜁
, 𝑆𝑒𝑓𝑓 denotes the effective beam area and ζ is the impedance of the
free space.
𝜔𝐼𝐹 = 𝜔𝑠 − 𝜔𝑙𝑜 is the intermediate frequency
For coherent detection there are two basic schemes depending on how the
downconversion from optical frequencies to baseband frequencies is performed. These
schemes are called heterodyne detection and homodyne detection.
Optical Hybrids
In coherent systems we need an optical hybrid in order to mix an optical signal
with a local oscillator source. The simplest hybrid is a 3dB coupler, also called 50/50
beam splitter or 1800 hybrid.
In the practical case, 𝑃𝑙𝑜 ≫ 𝑃𝑠 and bandpass filtering to remove DC terms leaves
𝐼 𝑡 = 𝑅𝑃 𝑡 = 2𝑅 𝑃𝑠 𝑃𝑙𝑜 cos 𝜙𝑠 − 𝜙𝑙𝑜
Receiver is sensitive to both amplitude and phase
The signal and LO lasers are phase locked to each other using a phase-locked loop
(PLL). However, it is Hard to construct and will need highly coherent lasers and very
expensive laser sources.
In addition, equation above only gives the cosine component (in other words, the in-
phase component with respect to the LO phase), and the sine component (the
quadrature component) cannot be detected at the same time. Therefore, this type of
homodyne receiver is not able to extract full information on the signal complex amplitude.
In the practical case, 𝑃𝑙𝑜 ≫ 𝑃𝑠 and bandpass filtering to remove DC terms leaves
𝐼 𝑡 = 𝑅𝑃 𝑡 = 2𝑅 𝑃𝑠 𝑃𝑙𝑜 cos 𝜙𝑠 − 𝜙𝑙𝑜
This information cannot be detected
in direct detection systems
𝑃𝑙𝑜 ≫ 𝑃𝑠 𝑃𝑙𝑜 + 𝑃𝑠 ≈ 𝑃𝑙𝑜 , DC term can be eliminated.
Assuming 𝜙𝑠 = 𝜙𝑙𝑜 there is an improvement of SNR:
𝐼ℎ𝑜𝑚𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑒 2 2𝑅𝑑 𝑃𝑠 𝑃𝑙𝑜 2 4𝑃𝑙𝑜
( ) =( ) = ≫1
𝐼𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑒 𝑅𝑑 𝑃𝑠 𝑃𝑠
If we make the intermediate frequency, 𝜔𝐼𝐹 ≠ 0 i.e. 𝜔𝑠 ≠ 𝜔𝑙𝑜 but have (𝑓𝑠 −𝑓𝑙𝑜 ) ≈
0.1 𝑡𝑜 5 𝐺𝐻𝑧, then we have intermediate frequency in the microwave range and standard
microwave components can be used in the detector. Assuming 𝑃𝑙𝑜 ≫ 𝑃𝑠 and bandpass
filtering to remove DC terms leaves
𝐼 𝑡 = 𝑅𝑃 𝑡 = 2𝑅 𝑃𝑠 𝑃𝑙𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝜔𝐼𝐹 + 𝜙𝑠 − 𝜙𝑙𝑜 = 𝐼𝐼𝐹 𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝜔𝐼𝐹 + 𝜙𝑠 − 𝜙𝑙𝑜
Hence, intensity, frequency or phase modulation can be used.
𝑃 𝑡
The received photon rate ~ cos 𝜔𝐼𝐹 varies with the intermediate frequency 𝑓𝐼𝐹 =
ℎ𝑓
(𝑓𝑠 −𝑓𝑙𝑜 ).
A SNR improvement is obtained with regard to IM/DD systems
2𝑅𝑑2 𝑃𝑠 𝑃𝑙𝑜
𝑆𝑁𝑅 =
2𝑞(𝑅𝑑 𝑃𝑙𝑜 + 𝐼𝑑 )∆𝑓 + 𝜎𝑇 2
Polarization
Measuring the quality of optical signals is one of the most important tasks in optical
communications. A variety of metrics are available, namely BER, the general shape of an
eye diagram, the optical signal-to-noise power ratio(OSNR), and the error vector
magnitude(EVM). In this section we only focus on BER.
BER is the probability that a bit is incorrectly identified by the receiver (due to the noise
and other signal distortion)
A better name would be bit error probability.
A traditional requirement for optical receivers is 𝐵𝐸𝑅 < 10−9
The bit error ratio (BER) is obtained by dividing the number of errors (𝑁𝑒 ) occurring over
a time interval t by the number of pulses (ones and zeros) transmitted during this
interval(𝑁𝑡 ):
𝑁𝑒 𝑁𝑒
𝐵𝐸𝑅 = =
𝑁𝑡 𝐵𝑇 𝑡
𝐵𝑇 is the bit rate (bits/sec) and is equivalent to 1/𝑇𝐵 where 𝑇𝐵 is the bit duration.
Given that most of the noise is added at the photoreceiver itself, it is desirable to
maximise the signal level (at the input to the receiver) so that the probability of bit errors
can be reduced.
However, this conflicts with the need to maximize transmission distances.
Let’s assume
𝑝(1) is the probability to send a ”one”
𝑝 0 1 is the probability to detect a sent out ”one” as a ”zero
1
𝐵𝐸𝑅 = 𝑝 1 𝑝 0 1 + 𝑝 0 𝑝 1 0 = [𝑝 0 1 + 𝑝 1 0 ]
2
Assume that the noise has Gaussian statistics
𝐼1 , 𝐼0 are the upper and lower current levels
𝜎1 , 𝜎2 are the standard deviations of the upper and lower levels
𝐼𝐷
1 (𝐼 − 𝐼1 )2 1 𝐼1 − 𝐼𝐷
𝑝 01 = exp(− )𝑑𝐼 = erfc( )
𝜎1 2𝜋 2𝜎1 2 2 𝜎1 2
−∞
∞
1 (𝐼 − 𝐼0 )2 1 𝐼𝐷 − 𝐼0
𝑝 10 = exp(− )𝑑𝐼 = erfc( )
𝜎0 2𝜋 2𝜎0 2 2 𝜎0 2
𝐼𝐷
1 𝐼1 − 𝐼𝐷 𝐼𝐷 − 𝐼0
𝐵𝐸𝑅 = [erfc + erfc ]
4 𝜎1 2 𝜎0 2
𝑑 𝐵𝐸𝑅
Minimize the BER using =0
𝑑𝐼𝐷
Optimal value is the intersection of the PDF for the “one” and “zero” levels
(𝐼𝐷 −𝐼0 )/𝜎0 = (𝐼1 −𝐼𝐷 )/𝜎1 ≡ 𝑄
𝜎0 𝐼1 + 𝜎1 𝐼0
𝐼𝐷 =
𝜎0 + 𝜎1
𝑄 is often used as a measure of signal quality
Thermal case: 𝜎1 = 𝜎0 and 𝐼𝐷 = (𝐼1 + 𝐼0 )/2
When shot noise cannot be neglected, 𝐼𝐷 shifts towards the ”zero” level
The 𝑄 value is a measure of the eye opening since
𝐼1 − 𝐼0
𝑄=
𝜎0 + 𝜎1
The optimum BER is related to the 𝑄 value as
𝑄2
1 𝑄 𝑒𝑥𝑝( )
𝐵𝐸𝑅 = 𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑐 ≈ 2
2 2 𝑄 𝜋
If currents and noise levels are known, the BER can be found from 𝑄.
Receiver sensitivity:
Minimum average power needed to keep the BER below a certain value (< 10−9 ).
We need to relate 𝑄 parameter to incident optical power
Imagine that you can observe the arrival of photons at a detector. The detector counts
the number of electron-hole pairs that are generated in an interval ∆𝑡.
The following assumptions can be made:
The probability of one photon being detected in ∆𝑡 is proportional to ∆𝑡 when ∆𝑡 is
very small.
The probability that more than one photon is detected in ∆𝑡 is negligible when ∆𝑡 is
very small.
The number of photons detected in any one interval is independent of the number of
photons detected in any other separate interval.
Under these conditions, we can show that the probability of detecting 𝑁𝑒 electrons in a
time period T obeys the Poisson distribution:
𝑁𝑒 𝑁𝑒𝑒 − 𝑁𝑒
𝑃𝑁𝑒 (𝑁𝑒 ) =
𝑁𝑒 !
𝑁𝑒 is the mean number of detected electrons in the time period T.
Ideally, optical energy would only be sensed (and e-h pairs generated) if a “1” is sent.
Therefore, the ideal receiver would then be an electron-hole pair counter, and would
make a decision based on a threshold current.
The most efficient situation is when the threshold is set between no pairs generated (a
“0” was sent) and “at least one pair generated” (a “1” was sent).
Therefore no errors occur if a “0” was sent (because no carriers can be generated).
However, errors may occur for a “1” if the incident optical power fails to generate any
carrier pairs at all (when 𝑁𝑒 could be expected).
The probability of this occurring is:
𝑁𝑒 0 𝑒 − 𝑁𝑒
𝑃𝑁𝑒 0 = = 𝑒 − 𝑁𝑒
0!
Since “0”s are received with no errors (𝑃0 0 = 0), and “1”s and “0”s are equally likely,
the overall error probability is:
1
𝐵𝐸𝑅 = 𝑒 − 𝑁𝑒
2
For 𝐵𝐸𝑅 = 10−9 therefore, 𝑁𝑒 = − ln 2 x10−9 = 20 photons
So far, we have discussed an ideal situation where the perfect pulses are corrupted only
by (inevitable) noise. In reality, the receiver sensitivity is degraded by many sources of
signal distortion. In the following we discuss some of these sources or mechanisms.
Limited modulator extinction ratio
𝑃0
The extinction ratio (ER) is defined as 𝑟𝑒𝑥 =
𝑃1
𝑃0 (𝑃1 ) is the emitted power in the off (on) state
Ideally, 𝑟𝑒𝑥 = 0
Different for direct and external modulation
We use that
The average received power is 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑐 = (𝑃1 +𝑃0 )/2
𝐼1 −𝐼0
The definition of the 𝑄 parameter is 𝑄 =
𝜎0 +𝜎1
We find the sensitivity degradation to be
1 − 𝑟𝑒𝑥 2 𝑅𝑑 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑐
𝑄=( )
1 + 𝑟𝑒𝑥 𝜎0 + 𝜎1
Multichannel systems
Wavelength division multiplexing (WDM)
WDM components
Linear crosstalk
Nonlinear crosstalk
Spectral efficiency
Time division multiplexing (TDM)
Why Multichannel systems?
The bandwidth of optical fibers is huge
Potential bit rate is >1 Tbit/s
In practice, electronics, dispersion, etc. is a bottle neck
Limits the OOK bit rate to ~40 Gbit/s
Simultaneous transmission of many channels offers the simplest way to make better
use of the available bandwidth.
A tunable optical filter is used to select one WDM channel while blocking all other
channels
Is a band-pass filter, typically with transmission in multiple bands
Has adjustable center wavelength
Is based on diffraction or interference
Desirable properties include
A wide tuning range, allowing processing of many WDM channels
Negligible crosstalk, close to zero out-of-band transmission
Fast tuning speed, allowing quick system re-configuration
Small insertion loss, avoiding need for extra amplification
Polarization insensitivity, since the signal polarization varies
Robustness against disturbances like vibrations
Prism
White light Individually
Individually colored colored
wavelengths wavelengths
Single transmission fiber
WDM channels should not interfere with each other during transmission
The most important design issue is interchannel crosstalk
Loosely speaking this means power transfer between channels
Crosstalk occurs due to
Non-ideal demultiplexing/filtering/routing components (linear crosstalk)
Nonlinear effects in optical fibers or devices (nonlinear crosstalk)
Any crosstalk degrades the BER and causes crosstalk-induced penalty
Linear crosstalk is classified as either out-of-band or in-band crosstalk
Out-of-band crosstalk means that power ”leaks” from neighboring channels
In-band crosstalk means that the crosstalk is at the same wavelength
Occurs in routing/networks
Adds coherently to the signal
Telecom operators prefer a successive approach of bringing fiber closer to the customer
premises:
PON is an optical network with a maximum fiber length of 20km between the Optical Line
Termination(OLT) and any Optical Network Unit(ONU). The minimal and the maximal
optical loss between the OLT and any ONU is defined as different PON classes:
Passive optical
splitter