GO TO IPCRF INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

0 June 2017 - March 2018 Mario A. Javier

Name of Ratee Rating Period Name of Rater

Teacher III Mamatid Senior High School Principal II

Position of Ratee School Position of Rater

Objective Weight per Efficiency Timeliness

KRA Number Objective Quality (Q) (E) (T) AVE. RATING SCORE

1 10% 4 3 3 3.33 0.33

2 10% 4 4 4 4.00 0.40
Teaching-learning Process (40%) 1.48
3 10% 4 3 5 4.00 0.40
4 10% 3 4 3.50 0.35
1 10% 2 5 3 3.33 0.33
Student's Outcome (30%) 2 10% 3 4 4 3.67 0.37 1.05
3 10% 4 3 3.50 0.35
1 3% 4 2 3.00 0.09
2 3% 5 3 3 3.67 0.11
Professional Growth and Development (10%) 0.39
3 2% 5 4 4.50 0.09
4 2% 5 5 5.00 0.10
1 4% 5 4 4.50 0.18
School, Home and Community Involvement (10%) 2 3% 4 3 3.50 0.11 0.40
3 3% 3 4 3.50 0.11
•Served as demonstration teacher at least once in a rating period, for peers, cooperating teachers, resource teachers,
in the in-service and, pre-service students on innovative teaching strategies, classroom management. 2% 4 4 3 3.67 0.07
•Conducted at least one (1) action research and shared results to peers on problems related to learning environment,
home, school and community involvement. 2% 5 5 3 4.33 0.09
Plus Factor (10%) •Graduated from a higher relevant degree. 2% 3 4 4 3.67 0.07 0.36
2% 3 3 3 3.00 0.06
2% 3 4 4 3.67 0.07
3.68
TOTAL
VS

0 MARIO A. JAVIER
Teacher III Principal II
 Prepared by:
MARIO A. JAVIER
Principal - Laguna Science National High School
& Masaya National High School
 INPUT DATA
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee: 0 Name of Rater: Mario A. Javier

Position: Teacher III Position: Principal II
Rating Period: June 2017 - March 2018 Date of Review:
Bureau/Centre/Division: Laguna School: Mamatid Senior High School

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

WEIGHT ACTUAL RESULT
MFO'S KRA'S OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
OBJECTIVE Q E T AVE.
QUALITY
Basic Education Teaching-learning 1. Prepares lesson plans and Daily JUNE 2017 - 10% 5- had all parts of DLP/ DLL with very appropriate, adequate and updated
instructional materials.
Services Process logs of activities inlcuding MARCH 2018 4- had all parts of DLP/ DLL with very appropriate and adequate instructional
appropriate, adequate and materials
(40%) upadated instructional materials. 3- had all parts of DLP/ DLL with appropriate and adequate instructional materials 4
2- had incomplete parts of DLP/ DLL with inappropriate and inadequate
instructional materials.
1- had incomplete parts of DLL/ DLP with no instructional materials.

EFFICIENCY
5- utilized 5 or more instructional materials 4- utilized 3 to 4 instructional materials
3- utilized 1-2 instructional materials 3.33 0.33
2- with instructional materials but were not utilized 1- no instructional materials was
used
3

TIMELINESS
5- exhibited promptness in the submiision of DLP/DLL daily.
4- exhibited promptness in the submiision of DLP/DLL 4 times a week.
3- exhibited promptness in the submiision of DLP/DLL 3 times a week.
2- exhibited promptness in the submiision of DLP/DLL twice a week. 3
1- exhibited promptness in the submiision of DLP/DLL once a week.

QUALITY
Basic Education
Services
Teaching-learning
Process
2. Facilitates the learning of
learners through functional daily
JUNE 2017 -
MARCH 2018
10% 5- Delivered accurate and updated content knowledge using appropriate
approaches and coopertive learning is highly evident. 1.48
4- Delivered updated content knowledge using appropriate approaches and
lesson logs and innovative strategies and cooperative learning is satisfactory evident.
teaching strategies and 3- Delivered updated content knowledge using appropriate approaches and
strategies and cooperative learning is fairly evident.
cooperative learning is evident. 2- Delivered updaed content knowledge using appropriate approaches and 4
strategies and cooperative learning is less evident.
1- Delivered updated content knowledge using appropriate approaches and
strategies and cooperative learning is not evident.

EFFICIENCY
5- The teacher established challenging and measurable goals for learners learning
4 0.4
that is alligned with the competencies.

4- The teacher developed measurable goals for the learners learning that is
alligned with the competencies.
3- The teacher clearly communicated a focus and learning is appropriate for
learners and is alligned with the competencies.
2- The teacher did not have a clear focus for learners learning.
1- The teacher did not have a clear focus for learners learning and the objectives 4
are too general to guide lesson planning or the objectives are inaappropriate for
learners.

Page 3 of 8
 TIMELINESS
5- facilitated functional DLP/DLL daily.
4- facilitated functional DLP/DLL 4 times a week.
3- facilitated functional DLP/DLL 3 times a week. 2- facilitated functional DLP/DLL
twice a week. 4
1- facilitated functional DLP/DLL once a week.

QUALITY
Basic Education Teaching-learning 3. Maintains discipline of learners 10% 5- discipline in the classroom was highly evident
4- discipline in the classroom was satisfactorily evident
Services Process inside the classroom guided by the 3- discipline in the classroom was fairly evident
rules and regulations. 2- discipline in the classroom was less evident 1- discipline in the classroom was 4
not evident

EFFICIENCY
5- 100% of the learners maintained discipline guided by the classrooms rules
regulations and guidelines
4- 75-99% of the learners maintained discipline guided by the classrooms rules
regulations and guidelines
3- 50-74% of the learners maintained discipline guided by the classrooms rules
regulations and guidelines
2- 25-49% of the learners maintained discipline guided by the classrooms rules 3 4 0.4
regulations and guidelines
1- 24% and below of the learners maintained discipline guided by the classrooms
rules regulations and guidelines

TIMELINESS
5- Maintained discipline of learners daily.
4- Maintained discipline of learners 4 out of 5 days.
3- Maintained discipline of learners 3out of 5
days.
2- Maintained discipline of learners 2 out of 5 days.
5
1- Maintained discipline of learners 1 out of 5 days.

QUALITY
Basic Education Teaching-learning 4. Monitors daily attendance and 10% 5- Monitored daily attendance and maintained a safe and orderly environment with
respect to all learners all the time
Services Process maintained a safe and orderly 4- Frequently monitored and maintained daily attendance and maintained a safe
environment with respect to all and orderly environment with respect to all learners
learners 3- Fairly monitored and maintained daily attendance and maintained a safe and
orderly environment with respect to all learners
2- Seldom monitored and maintained daily attendance and maintained a safe and 3
orderly environment with respect to all learners
1- did not monitor and maintain

EFFICIENCY
5- 100% of the learners attendance was monitored; safety orderliness and
cleanliness were maintained in all areas of the classroom 4- 75-99% of the learners
attendance was
monitored; safety orderliness and cleanliness were maintained in all areas of the
classroom including its surroundings.
3- 50-74% of the learners attendance was
monitored; safety orderliness and cleanliness were maintained in all areas of the
classroom including its surroundings.
3.5 0.35
2- 25-49% of the learners attendance was
monitored; safety orderliness and cleanliness were maintained in all areas of the
classroom including its surroundings.
4
1- 24% of the learners attendance was monitored;
safety orderliness and cleanliness were maintained in all areas of the classroom
including
its surroundings.

TIMELINESS

Page 4 of 8
 QUALITY
Basic Education Student's Outcome 1. Keeps accurate records of JUNE 2017 - 10% 5- Complied the complete and accurate records of grades and student's
performance in a portfolio, neatly, in order with data and documentation
Services (30%) grade/performance in every MARCH 2018 4- Keep records of grades and students performance neatly and in order
grading period 3- Keep records of grades and students performance
: Class Record 2- Keep records of grades only or performance 2
only
:Portfolio : 1- Keeps no record at all
School Forms
: Form 137 EFFICIENCY
:Form 38 5- All records and school forms indicated were submitted.
4- Only 4 of the records and school forms indicated were submitted.
3- Only 3 of the records and school forms indicated were submitted. 3.33 0.33
2- Only 2 of the records and school forms indicated were submitted. 5
1- Only 1 of the records and school forms indicated was submitted.

TIMELINESS
5- Submitted records of students two days earlier than the target date
4- Submitted records of students a day earlier than the target date
3- Submitted records of students 1-2 days after the target date
2- Submitted records of students 3-4 days after the target date 3
1- Submitted records of students 5 days after the target date

QUALITY
Basic Education Student's Outcome 2. Monitors, evaluates and JUNE 2017 - 10% 5- 96% - 100% of the students progress were monitored, evaluated and maintained
4- 85% - 95% of the students progress were monitored, evaluated and maintained
Services maintains Class/Student's MARCH 2018 3- 75% - 84% of the students progress were monitored, evaluated and maintained
progress 2- 65% - 74% of the students progress were monitored, evaluated and maintained
: Portfolio 1- below 65% of the students progress were monitored, evaluated and maintained
: Journal 3
: Test Results
: Outputs

EFFICIENCY
5- All outputs indicated were monitored, evaluated and maintained 1.05
4- Only 4 of the outputs were monitored, evaluated and maintained. 3.67 0.37
3- Only 3 of the outputs indicated were monitored, evaluated and maintained.
2- Only 2 of the outputs records indicated were monitored, evaluated and
maintained.
4
1- Only 1 of the output indicated was monitored, evaluated and maintained.

TIMELINESS
5- Outputs were monitored, evaluated and maintained daily.
4- Outputs were monitored, evaluated and maintained weekly.
3- Outputs were monitored, evaluated and maintained quarterly
2- Outputs were monitored, evaluated and maintained at the end of the semester
1- Outputs were not monitored, evaluated and maintained .
4

QUALITY
Basic Education Student's Outcome 3. Accounts learning outcomes vis- 10% 5- 85% to 100% proficiency level
4- 71%-84% proficiency level
Services à-vis goals and targets 3- 61%-70% proficiency level
: NAT/Achievement Test 2- 41%-60% proficiency level 4
: Drop-Out 1- 40% below proficiency level
:Promotion
:Pre- Post Test
EFFICIENCY
5- 0 dropped out for the year, 100% rate of promotion, 50% increase or more over
the pretest
4- 1%-2% dropped out/year, 95-99% rate of promotion, 40%-49% increase or more
over the pretest
3.5 0.35
3- 3%-4% dropped out/year, 90-94% rate of promotion, 30%-39% increase or more
over the pretest
3
2- 5%-8% dropped out/year, 85-89% rate of promotion, 20%-29% increase or more
over the pretest

1- 10% dropped out/year, 84% rate of promotion, 19% increase or more over the
pretest

Page 5 of 8
 TIMELINESS

QUALITY
Basic Education Professional 1. Attends seminars, workshops JUNE 2017 - 3% 5-Participated in regional/national/international seminars, workshops, GAD
4-Participated in division level seminars, workshops, GAD, or training
Services Growth and and trainings for teacher during the MARCH 2018 3- Participated in district/ cluster level seminar, workshop,GAD, or training
Development rating period 2- Participated in school level seminar, workshop, GAD or training. 4
(10%) 1- No participation

EFFICIENCY
5-Participated in 3 or more seminars/ workshops/ GAD, with documented results
4-Participated actively in 2 seminars/ workshops/ GAD, with documented results
3-Participated in one seminar/ workshops/ GAD, with documented results
2-Participated but did not finish the seminar/ workshops/ GAD 3 0.09
1- did not participate in any seminar/workshop/GAD 2

TIMELINESS

QUALITY
Basic Education Professional 2. Conducts problem/ classroom JUNE 2017 - 3% 5- Action Research conducted with full documentation on completion of
interventions
Services Growth and based action research MARCH 2018 4- Action research conducted with incomplete documentation on completion of
Development intevention
3-Proposed an action research 5
2- Identified classroom / learner problems and submitted title for approval
1- Identified classroom/ learning issues

EFFICIENCY
5- Action Research had complete entries of the required contents and neatly written
4- Action Research had 1 incomplete entry of the required contents
3- Action Research had 2 incomplete entries of the required contents
2- Action Research had 3 incomplete entries of the required contents
1- Action Research had 3-4 incomplete entries of the required contents
3 0.39
3.67 0.11
TIMELINESS
5- Submitted an action research proposal earlier than the opening of classes of the
current school year
4- Submitted an action research proposal from June to August of the current school
year
3- Submitted an action research proposal from September to October of the current
school year
2- Submitted an action research proposal from November to December of the 3
current school year
1- Submitted an action research proposal from January to March of the following
year.

QUALITY
Basic Education Professional 3 Participates actively in any 2% 5- 100% accomplishment with complete documentation
4- 100% accomplishment with incomplete documentation
Services Growth and professional or civic organization 3- 75% accomplishment with complete documentation
Development 2- 50% accomplishment with complete documentation 5
1- 25% accomplishment with complete documentation

EFFICIENCY
5- Active member of at least 3 associations/ organizations
4- Member of at least 3 associations/ organizations
4.5 0.09
3- Active Member of at least 2 associations/ organizations
2- Member of at least 2 associations/ organizations
1- Active member of at least 1 association/ organization 4

Page 6 of 8
 TIMELINESS

QUALITY
Basic Education Professional 4. Renders the following technical 2% 5- Initiated at leas 3 co-curricular/ school activities with documented results
4- Initiated and participated in at least 2 co curricular/ school activites with
Services Growth and assistance: documented results
Development *provided assistance to co- 3-Participated in a co curricular/school activity wth documented results
teachers in improving their 2- Participated in co-curricular activities without documented results
1- Did not participate in any co-curricular activities.
teaching competence 5
*assisted school administrators in
planning and managing in-service
training 5 0.1
EFFICIENCY
5- When 5 services were rendered
4- When 4 services were rendered
3- When 3 services were rendered
2- When 2 services were rendered. 5
1- When at least 1 service was rendered

TIMELINESS

QUALITY
Basic Education School, Home and 1. Conducts quarterly PTA JUNE 2017 - 4% 5- 100% accomplishment with set agreements met
4- 100% of planned meetings conducted producing only set agreements and partial
Services Community meetings/ conferences/ MARCH 2018 accomplishments of these
Involvement consultations 3- 75% of planned meetings conducted producing only set agreements
(10%) 2- 50% of planned meetings conducted with minimal results 5
1- 25% and below of planned meetings conducted with no results.

EFFICIENCY
5- 5 or more PTA meetings/ conferences were conducted
4- 4 PTA meetings/ conferences were conducted 4.5 0.18
3- 3 PTA meetings/ conferences were conducted
2-2 PTA meetings/ conferences were conducted 4
1-1 PTA meetings/ conferences were conducted

TIMELINESS

QUALITY
Basic Education
Services
School, Home and 2. Conducts home visitation of 3 %
Community of the students in his class
JUNE 2015-
MARCH 2016
3% 5- more than 100% accomplishment with set visits
4- 76-99% accomplishment of visits with partial success in implementation of 0.40
interventions
Involvement 3- 51- 75% accomplishment of visits with suggested planned interventions
2- 25%-50% accomplishment of visits with planned interventions
1- below 25% accomplishment of visits with no interventions
4

EFFICIENCY
3.5 0.11
5- more than 5% of the assigned students were visited
4- 5% of the assigned students were visited
3- 3%-4% of the assigned students were visited 2- 2% of the assigned students
were visited
2- 1% of the assigned students were visited 3

TIMELINESS

Page 7 of 8
 QUALITY
Basic Education School, Home and 3. Participates in at least 1 JUNE 2017 - 3% 5- 100% programs/ activities accomplishment with full documentation report
4- 76%- 99% programs/ activities accomplishment with incomplete documentation
Services Community outreach programs (such as gift- MARCH 2018 report
Involvement giving, feeding program, tree 3- 50%- 75% programs/ activities accomplishment with no completion report 3
planting, fun run etc.) 2- 25%- 49% programs/ activities accomplishment with no completion report
1- below 25% programs /activities with no completion report

EFFICIENCY 3.5 0.11

5- 3 or more outreach programs were acomplished
4- 2 outreach programs were accomplished
3- 1 outreach program were partially accomplishd
2- outreach program was planned and conceptualized but did not push through
1- no outreach program was accomplished
4

TIMELINESS

•Served as demonstration teacher at least once in a rating period, for peers, cooperating teachers, resource teachers, in the in-service and, pre-service students on
innovative teaching strategies, classroom management. 4 4 3 3.67 0.07
•Conducted at least one (1) action research and shared results to peers on problems related to learning environment, home, school and community involvement. 5 5 3 4.33 0.09
PLUS FACTOR (10%) •Graduated from a higher relevant degree. 3 4 4 3.67 0.07 0.36
3 3 3 3 0.06
3 4 4 3.67 0.07
3.68
TOTAL 100%
VS

0 MARIO A. JAVIER
Teacher III Principal II
Ratee Rater/Approving Authority

Page 8 of 8