Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Essay 3 Final Revision
Essay 3 Final Revision
Domenic Donjuan
1 December 2022
Beckmann, Lukas Fimpel, and V. Vanessa Wergin is a scientific research article focused on
finding out whether tennis players lose accuracy on their serve due to pressure from
surroundings, such as spectators. In their study, they gather twenty “highly skilled junior
athletes” that are between the ages of seventeen and eighteen (Beckmann, et al. 4). To begin,
they set up the players to “complete a series of eight serves in situations without pressure”,
which is labeled as the pre-test. (Beckmann, et al. 4). As the post-test, the participants were
instructed to do “another eight serves”, but now, with added pressure (Beckmann, et al. 4).
Throughout this article, the authors build strong credibility with the audience, use a data table
and a bar graph, and appeal to the audience’s emotion of sympathy in their article to successfully
support their argument that tennis players’ serves become less accurate because of pressure.
building strong credibility with the audience. For example, Jürgen Beckmann, Lukas Fimpel, and
V. Vanessa Wergin are all scholars from the “Department of Sport and Health Sciences” at the
Additionally, Beckmann also attended the “School of Movement and Nutrition Science” at the
appeals to ethos—match the genre expectations, as they are very credible sources because of the
Donjuan 2
universities they attended. They went to school to learn about this specific material that was able
to help them with the research in this experiment. The authors of the article themselves do not
address the audience of the text, as they are just researchers who are getting their work published
for the public and to possibly help in other similar experiments. The authors—as an appeal to
ethos—do match the purpose of the article, as they are the ones who are “investigat[ing] whether
similar effects of the left hand dynamic hand-grip can be found in a realistic tennis service
situation under pressure” (Beckmann, et al. 1). All of the authors of the article are appeals to
Secondly, the authors are effective in supporting their argument through the usage of a
data table and a bar graph. Table 1, a data table, and Figure 3, a bar graph, are both examples of
logos found in the article. Table 1 showcases the “means and standard deviations of the service
accuracy” (Beckmann, et al. 8). Figure 3 showcases the “distance[s] of valid serves from the
target” of both the “right hand group” and the “left hand group” (Beckmann, et al. 8). The data
table and the bar graph both match the genre expectations, as when conducting scientific
research to prove something, such examples are necessary to indicate what the changes were
from before to after the experiment. These two examples of logos only address the scientist and
psychologist audience, as they are the ones that can easily understand the data table and the bar
graph. Tennis players and coaches might take a quick glance at them and not really have an idea
of how to understand them. Table 1 and Figure 3 perfectly match with the purpose of the article,
as the data shows that pressure from the spectators and other surroundings do have an impact on
the performance of a tennis player’s serve. Additionally, they do support the argument
effectively, as the examples display real, statistical results that apply to logical thinking. The data
table and the bar graph from the article are both examples of logic and reasoning.
Donjuan 3
Finally, the authors continue to successfully support their argument by appealing to the
introduction: “A tennis player has practiced their serve a thousand times until it has become
completely automated, but when serving to win an important tournament, mistakes occur even in
highly skilled players” (Beckmann, et al. 1). When a person reads this, it can make them feel
sympathetic towards that player, as somebody who has put so many hours into practicing their
serve—an important aspect of their game—must have a fantastic serve, and they should not be
messing up during important points. This example of pathos at the beginning of the article does
not match the genre expectations, as in a scientific research article, pathos is not typically found.
This example is most likely in the article is to get attention of readers by making a connection to
their feelings. The sentence does address the tennis player and tennis coach audience, as players
might find themselves relating to the situation and coaches might think of a player they had that
was once in those shoes. This appeal to pathos does match the purpose of the article, as it is the
main reason as to why this experiment of determining whether pressure can cause a loss of
accuracy in a serve began in the first place. However, the sentence from the article does not
support the argument effectively—it is just simply a realistic example that is meant to grasp the
attention of readers. This is a great example of an appeal to pathos as it gets the reader to feel a
All in all, Beckman, Fimpel, and Wergin’s article is effective in supporting its argument
because it provides a connection to each rhetorical appeal: ethos, logos, and pathos. The authors
themselves are appeals to ethos, as they studied and went to school to learn all about the sciences
that go into playing the sport of tennis, which makes them credible sources. The data table and
bar graph from the article are both statistical data, which are examples of logos, as they both
Donjuan 4
provide real proof. The very first sentence of the article is an appeal to pathos, as it makes the
reader feel sympathetic for the situation being used as an example. This article’s effectiveness in
supporting its argument is important because it allows for tennis players to understand why they
should switch to a new grip that will boost the performance of their serve.
Donjuan 5
Work Cited
Beckmann, Jürgen, et al. “Preventing a Loss of Accuracy of the Tennis Serve under
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255060.