Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Caveat in Saket Syed Kamran Ali, Advocate
Caveat in Saket Syed Kamran Ali, Advocate
In re:
J Law offices Proposed Petitioner
VERSUS
Let nothing be done in the above matter without hearing the Respondent/
RESPONDENT/CAVEATOR
THROUGH
In re:
J Law offices Proposed Petitioner
VERSUS
2. That the Respondent /Caveator is, therefore, filing the present caveat
under O.39 R.1 & 2 CPC accompanying in the said Arbitration Case,
PRAYER
Respondent/Caveator ;
B. No order/orders be passed in the application under Section 9 of
RESPONDENT/CAVEATOR
THROUGH
In re:
J Law offices Proposed Petitioner
VERSUS
AFFIDAVIT
I, Vindu Goenka, W/o Late Sh. Arun Goenka, Aged about 70 years
R/o 20, Anand Lok, August Kranti Marg, New Delhi 110049 do hereby
well conversant with the facts of the case and hence I am competent to
caveat, which has been drafted under my instructions and I state that
the same are true and correct to my knowledge and nothing material
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
Verified at New Delhi on this _____ day of April, 2022 that the contents
of my above affidavit are true and correct to my knowledge and
nothing material fact has been concealed therefrom.
DEPONENT
IN THE COURT OF LD. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, SOUTH
SAKET COURTS, DELHI
CAVEAT NO. OF 2021
IN
ARB. No ______ OF 2021
In re:
J Law offices Proposed Petitioner
VERSUS
INDEX
AFFIDAVIT.
4. VAKALATNAMA
THROUGH
In re:
J Law offices Proposed Petitioner
VERSUS
1. J Law Offices,
Through Mr.S. Jawahar Lal(Sole Proprietor)
Email:Jawahar@jlaw.in
Versus
Vindu Goenka
New Delhi-110017
Email: vindugoenka@hotmail.com
Caveator/Proposed Respondent
Through
SYED KAMRAN ALI
ADVOCATE FOR THE CAVEATOR
49A/1,Behind RPs Restaurant
Savitri Nagar,
NEWDELHI, 110017
(M) (+91) 8650458650
kamran093@gmail.com
Dated: 15.04.2022
Place: New Delhi
IN THE COURT OF LD. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, SOUTH SAKET COURTS,
DELHI
CAVEAT NO. OF 2022
IN
ARB. No ______ OF 2022
VERSUS
ADVOCATES CLIENT