43th BCS Written Exam 03.

Translate the following passage into English 25

Subjective Test-12 GKwU †`‡ki wk¶‡Ki gh©v`v evo‡j †m †`‡ki wk¶vi ¸YMZ gvb †hgb ev‡o, Avevi wVK
Time: 2 hour Full marks-100 GKBfv‡e wk¶vi ¸YMZ gvb evo‡jI Zv wk¶‡Ki gh©v`v‡K evovq| G †¶‡Î ivóª Av‡M wk¶‡Ki
01. Write an essay in about 1000 words on any one of the following gh©v`v evov‡e bv wk¶K Av‡M ¸YMZ wk¶v`vb Ki‡eb, †mUv wb‡q ZK© Ki‡j Zv A‡bKUv ÔwWg
topics: 50 Av‡M bv gyiwM Av‡MÕi g‡Zv AgxgvswmZ i‡q hv‡e| GKUv aviYv G iKg cÖPwjZ Av‡Q †h GKRb
a) The social-economic prospects of padma multipurpose bridge. wk¶K n‡”Qb GKRb wk¶K| Avi `kUv gvby‡li g‡Zv wZwb UvKv cqmv, my‡hvM-myweav, ¶gZv-
b) Information Technology (IT): Problems & Prospects cÖwZcwË BZ¨vw` wb‡q gv_v Nvgv‡eb bv| wZwb †Kej m¤§vb cvIqvi Avkvq KvR K‡i hv‡eb| wKš‘
c) Communal Harmony and Bangladesh ev¯Í‡e wk¶‡Kiv IB m¤§vbUzKzI cvb bv| KviY, b~¨bZg A_©-¶gZv Qvov G ai‡bi m¤§vb cvIqvUv
02. Translate the following passage into Bangla 25 A‡b¨i `qvi Ici wbf©i K‡i, Ges A‡b¨i `qvi Ici †h m¤§vb wbf©i K‡i, †mUv Vzb‡Kv n‡Z
One of the remarkable things about the global economic order since eva¨| K_vwUi m‡½ hvuiv wØgZ †cvlY Ki‡eb, Zvuiv wbðqB AZx‡Zi D`vniY Uvb‡eb| Av‡M
World War II has been the flexibility of governments in responding to wkw¶Z gvby‡li msL¨v Kg wQj e‡j ïay wkw¶Z gvbyl nIqvi myev‡` wk¶‡Kiv †h GKai‡bi gh©v`v
serious crises. From stagflation and the collapse of the Bretton Woods †c‡Zb, Zv wVK| wKš‘ †Kej wk¶K wn‡m‡e wK ˆmq` gyRZev Avjxi Ôcv`UxKvÕ M‡íi
currency regime in the 1970s to the Asian financial crisis of the 1990s cwÐZgkvB‡qi †P‡q †ewk gh©v`v †c‡Zb? MíwU‡Z GK jvU mv‡ne ¯‹zj cwi`k©‡b G‡m cÖ_vMZ
to the global financial crisis in this century, the world’s major mvgvb¨ GKUz †mŠRb¨ cÖKvk Kiv‡Z cwÐZgkvB G‡Kev‡i weMwjZ n‡q cvVK‡`i eywS‡q †`b, ïay
economies have proven surprisingly adept at finding ways to cooperate A_©vfv‡e bq, m¤§vbnxbZvi Kvi‡YI KZUv eyfz¶z n‡q Av‡Qb wZwb| hv‡nvK Avgv‡`i g‡Zv mxwgZ
to address serious challenges. This time around, that lucky streak may m¤c‡`i †`‡k bxwZwba©viK‡`i Ab¨ ¸iæZ¡c~Y© welq ev` w`‡q wk¶vq AviI †ewk wewb‡qvM Ki‡eb
finally break. The current concatenation of problems—the Russia- wK-bv, ev GLv‡b wewb‡qvM Ki‡j wk¶‡Kiv Zvi mبenvi Ki‡Z cvi‡eb wK-bv, G wb‡q eûevi
Ukraine war, inflation, global food and energy shortages, unwinding wPšÍv Ki‡Z nq| Ab¨w`‡K gyRZev Avjxi cwÐZgkvB‡qi †P‡q wk¶K‡`i Ae¯’v GLb A‡bK
asset bubbles in the United States, debt crises in developing countries,
fv‡jv n‡jI Ab¨‡`i m‡½ Zzjbv Ki‡j Zvu‡`i nZvkv ev‡o ˆe K‡g bv| wk¶vi ¸YMZ gvb
and the lingering impacts of COVID-19-related shutdowns and supply
evov‡bvi Rb¨ †h cÖej ZvwM` Abyfe Kiv `iKvi, msMZ Kvi‡YB †mUv `ye©j n‡Z _v‡K|
chain bottlenecks—may be the most serious crisis of them all, not least
because central banks can’t print wheat and gasoline. Yet there are few
signs of the collective responses that will be needed to meet these
challenges. Global cooperation has never been more urgent—and
seemed less likely. Fraying cooperation is, ironically, mostly a
consequence of past successes. The world’s past ability to manage
crises, transcend disruptions, and restore the trajectory of global growth
means that many more countries today have become rich enough to
wield influence and demand their interests be considered. Others are
pursuing territorial or ideological goals they consider more urgent than
immediate economic priorities. As a result, consensus has become
almost impossible to find. The upshot is that in this crisis, the world will
be condemned to a series of competing and partial responses rather than
again finding a way to come together to address the challenge.