Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Voluntary Guidelines For Catch Documentation Schemes
Voluntary Guidelines For Catch Documentation Schemes
ISBN 978-92-5-130009-1
© FAO, 2017
2 Definitions 2
3 Basic principles 3
ANNEX
Information elements for Catch Certificates
and additional information along the supply chain 11
Acronyms
CDS IPOA IUU
Catch Documentation Scheme International Plan of Action Illegal, unreported and
unregulated (fishing)
SSF WTO
Small-scale fisheries World Trade Organization
iv
Executive summary
The UN Fisheries Resolution on Sustainable Fisheries of
9 December 2013 expresses concerns over the continued
threat to marine habitats and ecosystems represented by
Illegal, Unregulated and Unreported (IUU) fishing, and also
acknowledges the negative impact that these activities
have on food security and State economies, particularly in
developing regions. FAO has an established role in facilitating the
collaborative development by States of international instruments
that set out principles and standards for responsible practices
in the management, conservation and development of fisheries.
Therefore, the Resolution calls upon States to, inter alia, initiate
within FAO as soon as possible the elaboration of guidelines and
other relevant criteria relating to catch documentation schemes.
v
vi
1
1. Scope and objective
1.1 These Guidelines are voluntary and when developing and implementing new
cover Catch Documentation Schemes (CDS) CDS, or harmonising or reviewing existing
for wild capture fish caught for commercial CDS.
purposes in marine or inland areas, whether
processed or not. 1.4 States should give full recognition
to the special requirements of developing
1.2 These guidelines are elaborated states when implementing CDS taking into
recognizing that all available means in account paragraph 7.
accordance with relevant international law
and other international instruments, such as, 1.5 States, relevant international
the International Plan of Action to Prevent, organisations, whether governmental or
Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and non-governmental, and financial institutions
Unregulated Fishing (IPOA-IUU) should be are encouraged, individually or through
used to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, coordination, to provide assistance and
unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing. capacity building, including financial and
CDS build on the primary responsibility technical assistance, technology transfer
of the flag state to prevent, deter and and training for developing states in order
eliminate IUU fishing. They also constitute a to achieve the objectives of these Guidelines
valuable supplement to port state and other and to support its effective implementation,
measures. especially regarding issuance of electronic
catch certificates.
1.3 The objective of these Guidelines is
to provide assistance to states, regional 1.6 CDS should account for the needs and
fisheries management organisations, special requirements of small-scale fisheries
regional economic integration organizations (SSF).
and other intergovernmental organisations
1
2
2. Definitions
For the purposes of these Guidelines: 2.6 “Illegal, unreported and unregulated
fishing” means the activities set out in
2.1 “Catch Documentation Scheme”, paragraph 3 of the 2001 FAO International
means a system with the primary purpose Plan of Action to Prevent, Deter and
of helping determine throughout the supply Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and
chain whether fish originate from catches Unregulated Fishing, hereinafter referred to
taken consistent with applicable national, as “IUU fishing.”
regional and international conservation
and management measures, established 2.7 “Landing” means the initial movement
in accordance with relevant international of fish from a vessel to dockside in a port
obligations, hereinafter referred to as “CDS. or free-trade zone, even if subsequently
transferred to another vessel. The offload
2.2 “Catch certificate” means an official or transfer in port of fish from a vessel to a
document accompanying a consignment container is a landing.
and validated by the competent authority,
allowing accurate and verifiable information 2.8 “Regional fisheries management
concerning fish passing through the supply organization” means an intergovernmental
chain. fisheries organization or arrangement,
as appropriate, that has the competence
2.3 “Fish” means all species of wild capture to establish fishery conservation and
living aquatic resources, whether processed management measures, hereinafter referred
or not. to as “RFMO/A.”
2.4 “Consignment” means fish, which are 2.9 “Supply chain” means a sequence of
either sent simultaneously from one exporter processes involved in the production and
to one consignee or covered by a single distribution of fish from catch to the point of
transport document covering their shipment import in the end market, including events
from the exporter to the consignee. such as landing, transshipments, re-export,
processing, and transport.
2.5 “Fishing vessel” means any vessel of
any size used for, equipped for use for, or 2.10 “Transshipment” means the transfer
intended for use for the purposes of fishing of fish that have not previously been landed,
or fishing-related activities, including support from one vessel directly to another, at sea or
vessels, fish-processing vessels, vessels in port.
engaged in transshipment and carrier vessels
equipped for the transportation of fishery
products, except container vessels.
2
3
3. Basic principles
3
4
4. Application of basic principles
The application of the principles set out poses on the relevant stocks and markets. A
in paragraph 3 should be guided by the risk assessment should include:
following:
(a) the systematic and transparent
4.1 Any measure taken should be in identification of risk and the
conformity with the relevant provisions implementation of all measures
under international law, inter alia the World necessary for limiting exposure to risk.
Trade Organization agreements, the United This includes activities such as collecting
Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, data and information, analysing and
and should take into account the FAO Code of assessing risk, prescribing and taking
Conduct for Responsible Fisheries; action, including regular monitoring and
review;
4.2 To avoid unnecessary barriers to trade, (b) consideration of any IUU fishing
a CDS should clearly define its objective,
activities within, inter alia, fish stocks,
be the least trade-restrictive measure to
fleet, geographical area, or fishery that
achieve its objective, and be designed to
impact negatively on management and
minimize the burden on those affected by
control measures, fisher’s income and
its requirements. A CDS should be applied
livelihood, markets and other relevant
on a non-discriminatory basis and notified in
factors;
accordance with subparagraph 4.5;
(c) consideration of whether the vessels or
4.3 Different CDS could be recognised as fleets in question are flying the flag of a
equivalent for the purpose of achieving the state that has not implemented relevant
objectives of the guidelines if they result in international obligations and guidelines;
equivalent outcomes. In addition, existing and
schemes should be taken into account; and
(d) in the case of CDS to be developed
4.4 Every effort should be made to ensure within a RFMO, the RFMO should
that CDS are only implemented where additionally consider the ability of CDS
they can be an effective means to prevent to address the IUU risk due to potential
products derived from IUU fishing from gaps in its existing conservation and
entering the supply chain. To that end CDS management regimes, including the
should be implemented from within the effectiveness of current monitoring,
context of an effective fisheries management control and surveillance (MCS) measures.
regime. CDS should be designed and
implemented based on risk analysis and be 4.5 To improve the transparency of the
proportionate to the risk that IUU fishing supply chain and markets CDS should ensure
4
accurate and verifiable information along (c) be based on agreed international
the supply chain. To ensure CDS are reliable, standards and formats for information
simple, clear and transparent: exchange and data management,
ensuring that its components provide for
(a) catch certificates should be user friendly interoperability;
and contain verifiable information that is
relevant, necessary and readily available; (d) be flexible, user friendly and minimise
and the burden on users. Functions such
as routines for uploading of scanned
(b) a proposed measure should be documents, printing of documents,
publicized and a reasonable time for cancelling documents, and data queries
comments should be given before the should be considered;
measure is adopted. Adopted measures
should be made available on relevant (e) include secure access by use of logins
websites.1 Such notice should include and passwords or by other appropriate
an explanation of how domestic and means;
imported products are treated to ensure
even-handedness. (f) define roles and responsibilities for data
inputs and validation and specify which
4.6 Secure electronic systems should be parts, functions and levels of the system
used to reduce the risk of falsification. The the individual user or user group may
systems should: have access to;
(a) serve as the mechanism of issuance and, (g) facilitate the documentation flow;
validation of catch certificates by the
competent authority and should function (h) provide for greater flexibility in the
as the repository of catch certificate and information requirements; and
supply chain data to allow verification of
information; (i) assure support for developing States in
the development and implementation of
(b) ensure that accurate and verifiable secure electronic systems.
information is available along the supply
chain through cooperation of states
involved in it;
1
For the purpose of these Guidelines, such notifications should, as a
minimum, be made available on the website of the State proposing or
implementing a measure and on the WTO and FAO websites.
5
5
5. Cooperation and notification
5.1 CDS are most effective when all states (a) it has in place national arrangements
involved cooperate in the schemes. States for the implementation, control and
should seek wide multilateral engagements enforcement of laws, regulations
in the development and implementation of and conservation and management
CDS, based on the risk assessment approach measures that must be complied with by
and cost-effectiveness considerations. fishing vessels; and
Multilateral or regional CDS are preferred.
(b) the competent authority is empowered
5.2 States should make every effort to to attest to the veracity of the relevant
cooperate in the design, implementation and information contained in catch
administration of CDS. Such cooperation certificates and to carry out verifications
should aim to: of such certificates on request from the
importing state. The notification should
(a) ensure that the risk assessment is based also include the necessary information to
on clear objective criteria; identify and contact the authority. If the
information provided in the notification
(b) ensure that imports of fish originate is incomplete, the importing state or
from catches made in compliance with RFMO should indicate to the state
applicable legislation; validating the catch certificate, without
delay, which elements are missing and
(c) facilitate the importation of fish and
request that it provide a new notification
the verification requirements of catch
as soon as possible.
certificates; and
(d) provide for the establishment of All states involved in events in the supply
a framework for the exchange of chain in the CDS should designate a
information. competent authority to ensure availability of
accurate and verifiable information along the
5.3 The acceptance of catch certificate supply chain.
should be subject to the notification by the
validating state that:
6
6
6. Recommended functions and standards
6.1 The CDS should be based on a clearly products, clear links to the underlying catch
defined objective, enabling determination certificate should be available to facilitate
of the level of traceability and functions verification by importing states.
required. It should be designed to meet its
objective and minimize the burden on users. 6.5 When establishing a CDS, due
consideration should be given to:
6.2 The CDS should clearly specify the
species and stocks concerned, wherever (a) applicable monitoring, control and
applicable, product types, and exemptions surveillance requirements;
associated with the scheme, and list
(b) relevant standards for information
all applicable Harmonized System (HS)
exchange and data confidentiality;
classifications.
(c) use the operative languages necessary
6.3 In the CDS validation process, different to the efficient and effective function of
roles of relevant states to authorise, monitor, the CDS; and
and control fishing operations and verify
catch, landing, and trade should be fully (d) user manuals for various user groups
recognized, consistent with relevant national and provide appropriate training, taking
and international law, multilateral measures, into account, the special requirements of
instruments and obligations. Validation developing states.
of the catch documentation information
should be done by a competent authority. 6.6 Core information elements for CDS
According to the specific circumstances are set out in the Annex. To ensure the
of the fisheries, all relevant states could link between the catch and the products,
take part in the verification of information information along the supply chain should be
in the catch documentation. Importing included as appropriate. In specific instances,
states may request verification by the CDS may incorporate additional elements as
competent authorities validating the catch necessary to achieve their objectives.
documentation.
7
7
7. Cooperation with and recognition of the special
requirements of developing States
7.1 States should give full recognition 7.3 States may, either directly or through
to the special requirements of developing FAO, assess the special requirements of
States, in particular the least-developed developing States to implement these
among them and Small Island Developing guidelines including the needs for assistance
States (SIDS), to ensure that they have the identified in subparagraph 7.2.
ability to implement these Guidelines.
7.4 States may cooperate to establish
7.2 In this regard, States may, either appropriate funding mechanisms to assist
directly or through international developing States to implement these
organizations, including RFMO/As, provide guidelines. These mechanisms may be
assistance to developing States in order for directed specifically towards the needs for
them to enhance their ability to,inter alia: assistance identified in subparagraph
(a) develop, implement and improve 7.5 States may establish an ad hoc working
practical and effective CDS; group to periodically report and make
recommendations on the establishment of
(b) develop an adequate legal and
funding mechanisms.
regulatory framework for CDS;
8
9
10
ANNEX
Information elements for Catch
Certificates and additional
information along the supply chain
11
The Voluntary Guidelines for Catch Documentation
Schemes have been elaborated in response to the
concerns expressed in the UN Fisheries Resolution
on Sustainable Fisheries of 9 December 2013
over the continued threat to marine habitats and
ecosystems represented by Illegal, Unregulated
and Unreported fishing, and the negative impact
that these activities have on food security and
State economies, particularly in developing regions.
Therefore, the Resolution called upon States to,
inter alia, initiate within FAO as soon as possible
the elaboration of guidelines and other relevant
criteria relating to catch documentation schemes.
ISBN 978-92-5-130009-1
9 7 8 9 2 5 1 3 0 0 0 9 1
I8076EN/1/11.17