哈佛大学比较政治学课程书单

哈佛大学博士班的比较政治课程由 Steve Levitsky 和 Daniel Ziblatt 讲授。

Steve Levitsky教授的研究领域为政党政治、威权主义和民主化，并且主要关注拉丁美
洲的政治发展。

Daniel Ziblatt 教授的研究领域为欧洲政治、国家构建、民主化和历史政治经济学。

Foundational Works: Classical Approaches to the Problem of Modernization

1. Karl Deutsch, “Social Mobilization and Political Development,” American Political

Science Review, vol. 55 (Sept. 1961)
2. Alex Inkeles, “The Modernization of Man,” in Myron Weiner, ed. Modernization: The
Dynamics of Growth (New York: Basic Books, 1966), pp. 138-150.
3. Samuel Huntington, Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven: Yale University
Press, 1968), pp. 1-92, 192-263. [note: you may skim pp. 219-263]
4. Barrington Moore, Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the
Making of the Modern World (Boston: Beacon Press, 1966), chapters 7-9 (pp. 413-483)
5. Immanuel Wallerstein, “The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System:
Concepts for Comparative Analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History 16, No.4
(September 1974), pp. 387-415.
6. Ronald Inglehart and Christian Welzel, Modernization, Cultural Change, and
Democracy: The Human Development Sequence (New York: Cambridge University Press,
2005), Chapters 1-2 (pp. 15-76)

Competing Approaches to Comparative Politics

1. Gabriel Almond and Stephen Genco, “Clouds, Clocks, and the Study of Politics,” World
Politics, 29 (1977). Economic Approaches
2. Peter Gourevitch, Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International
Economic Crises (Cornell University Press, 1986), Ch 1 (pp. 17-34) and Ch 6 (pp. 221-240).
3. Ronald Rogowski, “Political Cleavages and Changing Exposure to Trade,”American
Political Science Review 81, No. 4 (December 1987): 1121-1136.
 Cultural Approaches
4. Gabriel Almond and Sidney Verba, eds., The Civic Culture (Boston: Little, Brown, 1963),
pp. 1-44, 307-315, and 337-374).
5. Harry Eckstein, “A Culturalist Theory of Political Change,” American Political Science
Review83, No. 3 (September 1988): 789-804.
6. Lisa Wedeen, “Conceptualizing Culture: Possibilities for Political Science,”American
Political Science Review, vol. 96, no. 4 (Dec. 2002).
7. David J. Elkins and Richard E. B. Simeon, “A Cause in Search of Its Effect, or What Does
Political Culture Explain?” Comparative Politics, 11 (January 1979): 127-146.

Statist Approaches
8. Theda Skocpol, “Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research.”
In Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol, eds. Bringing the State Back
In (Cambridge University Press, 1985), pp. 3-37.

Rational Choice Approaches

9. Barbara Geddes, Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in
Comparative Politics (University of Michigan Press, 2003), chapter 5 (pp. 175-211).

Path Dependent Approaches

10. Paul Pierson, Politics in Time (Princeton University Press, 2004), Introduction (pp. 1-10
only), Chapters 1-2 (pp. 17-78).

Institutions and Institutional Analysis

Overview and Approaches

1. Peter A. Hall and Rosemary Taylor, “Political Science and the Three New
Institutionalisms,” Political Studies, 44 (December 1996)
2. Paul Pierson and Theda Skocpol, “Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political
Science,” in Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner, eds.Political Science: State of the
Discipline(New York: W.W. Norton, 2002), pp. 693-721.
3. Barry Weingast, “Rational-Choice Institutionalism.” in Ira Katznelson and Helen V.
Milner, eds. Political Science: State of the Discipline (New York: W.W. Norton, 2002), pp.
660-692.
Institutional Effects
4. Matthew S. Shugart and John M. Carey, Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design
and Electoral Dynamics (Cambridge University Press, 1992), Chapters 1-3 (pp.1-54) and
Chapter 13 (pp. 273-287).
5. Arend Lijphart, “Constitutional Choices for New Democracies,” Journal of
Democracy(Winter 1991).
6. George Tsebelis, “Veto Players and Institutional Analysis,” Governance 13: 4 (October
2000): 441-474.
7. Jonathan Rodden, “Back to the Future: Endogenous Institutions and Comparative Politics,”
in Mark I. Lichbach and Alan S. Zuckerman, eds.Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture,
and Structure (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp.333-357.
8. Gretchen Helmke and Steven Levitsky, “Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A
Research Agenda.” Perspectives on Politics 2, No. 4 (2004): 725-740.

Explaining Institutional Design

1. Douglass C. North and Barry R. Weingast, “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution
of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth Century England,” Journal of
Economic History 49, No 4 (December 1989): 803-832.
2. Terry Moe, “Political Institutions: The Neglected Side of the Story.” Journal of Law,
Economics, and Organization 6 (1990): 213-253.
3. Paul Pierson, Politics in Time (Princeton University Press, 2004), chapter 4.

Institutional Change

4. James Mahoney and Kathleen Thelen, “A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change,” in

Mahoney and Thelen, eds. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and
Power(New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 1-37.

5. Avner Greif and David Laitin, “A Theory of Endogenous Institutional Change,” American

Political Science Review 98, No. 4 (November 2004): 633-652.

The Logics and Methods of Comparative Politics

1. Arend Lijphart, “The Comparable Cases Strategy in Comparative Research,” Comparative

Political Studies (July 1975): 158-177
2. Theda Skocpol and M. Somers, The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial
Inquiry,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 65 (1980): 174-197
3. John Gerring, “The Case Study,” in Carles Boix and Susan C. Stokes, eds. The Oxford
Handbook of Comparative Politics (Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 90-122.
4. Jasket Sekhon, “Quality Meets Quantity: Case Studies, Conditional Probability, and
Counterfactuals,” Perspectives on Politics (June 2004): 281-293
5. Gary King, Robert Keohane and Sidney Verba, Designing Social Inquiry(Princeton U
Press), pp. 3-9; 36-46; 115-149; 168-69; 176-182; 185-187; 189-193; 208-228
6. Henry Brady and David Collier, Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared
Standards, Chapter 1 (pp. 3-20) chapter 6 (pp. 85-102), Chapters 12-13 (195-266).
7. Peter Hall, “Aligning Ontology and Methodology,” in James Mahoney and Dietrich
Rueschemeyer, eds. Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences (Cambridge,
2003), pp. 373-404.
8. Peter Hall, “Systematic Process Analysis: When and How to Use it,”European Political
Science 7, 3 (August 2008): 304-317.
9. Giovanni Sartori “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics,” American Political
Science Review (December 1970): 1033-1053 20
10. David Collier and Robert Adcock, “Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for
Qualitative and Quantitative Research,” American Political Science Review 95 (3) September
2001: pp. 529-546.
11. Evan Lieberman, “Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative
Research,” American Political Science Review (August 2005) 99, 3: 435-452

Political Economy of Development

1. W.W. Rostow, The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto (Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press, [1960] 1990), pp. 1-12
2. Gerschenkron, Alexander, Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective(Cambridge:
Harvard University Press, 1962), pp.5-30.
3. North, Douglas C., Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic
Performance(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), pp. 83-104, 107-117.
4. Johnson, Chalmers, MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy,
1925-1975 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1982), pp. 3-34.
5. Alice Amsden, The Rise of “The Rest”: Challenges to the West from LateIndustrializing
Economies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 1-17, 125-160.
6. Robert H. Bates, Markets and States in Tropical Africa: The Political Basis of Agricultural
Policies (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981), pp. 1-105.
7. Przeworski, Adam, and Michael Alvarez, José Antonio Cheibub, and Fernando
Limongi, Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World,
1950-1990(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), pp. 142-179.
8. Jeffrey Sachs, “Tropical Underdevelopment,” NBER Working Paper (2001), pp. 1-40.
9. Dani Rodrik, Arvind Subramanian, and Francesco Trebbi, “Institutions Rule: The Primacy
of Institutions Over Geography and Integration in Economic Development” Journal of
Economic Growth 9 (2004), pp. 131-158.
10. Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson and James Robinson, “Reversal of Fortune: Geography
and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution,” Quarterly Journal
of Economics 118 (2002): 1231-94

The State and State-Building

1. Stephen Krasner, “Approaches to the State,” Comparative Politics (January 1984), pp. 223-

246
2. Douglas North. 1986. “A Neoclassical Theory of the State,” in Jon Elster, ed.Rational
Choice(New York University Press, 1986), pp. 248-261.
3. Barbara Geddes, Politicians Dilemma (University of California Press, 1994), pp. 1-19.
4. Charles Tilly, “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime” in Peter Evans,
Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol, Bringing the State Back In(Cambridge
University Press, 1985), pp. 169-191
5. Thomas Ertman, Birth of the Leviathan: Building States and Regimes in Medieval and
Early Modern Europe (Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp. 1-34.
6. Desmond King and Robert Lieberman, “Ironies of State Building: A Comparative
Perspective on the American State.” World Politics 61, No. 3 (July 2009): 547-588.
7. Robert Bates, Prosperity and Violence (2nd edition) (WW Norton, 2009), Chapters 3-4 (pp.
34-66).
8. Jeffrey Herbst, States and Power in Africa: Comparative Lessons in Authority and
Control(Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 12-31.
9. Miguel Centeno “Blood and Debt: War and Taxation in Nineteenth Century Latin
America,” American Journal of Sociology 102 (6) 1997, pp. 1565-1605.
10. Dan Slater, “Can Leviathan be a Democrat? Competitive Elections, Robust Mass Politics,
and State Infrastructural Power.” Studies in Comparative International Development 43:4
(December 2008), pp. 252-272
11. Anna Grzymala Busse, “The Discreet Charm of Formal Institutions: Postcommunist Party
Competition and State Oversight,” Comparative Political Studies (December 2006), pp. 1-30.
12. Robert H. Bates, When Things Fall Apart: State Failure in Late-Century
Africa (Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 3-6, 15-29, 97-139.

Political Regimes I: Classical Approaches to Democratization

1. Robert Dahl, Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition (New Haven: Yale University Press,

1971), ch 1 (pp. 1-16), chapters 3-6 (pp. 33-104).
2. Seymour Martin Lipset, Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics (Garden City, NY:
Doubleday, 1960), chapter 2.
3. Adam Przeworski and Fernando Limongi, “Modernization: Theories and Facts,” World
Politics, 49 (January 1997), pp. 155-183.
4. Dankwart Rustow, “Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model,”Comparative
Politics, 2 (April 1970), pp. 337-364.
5. Carles Boix, Democracy and Redistribution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
2003), pp. 1-59.
6. Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson, Economic Origins of Dictatorship and
Democracy(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), chapters 2-3 (pp. 15-87)
7. Ziblatt, Daniel, “How Did Europe Democratize?” World Politics 58:2 (January 2006), 311-
38.
8. Juan Linz, “The Perils of Presidentialism,” Journal of Democracy 1, No. 1 (Winter 1990).

Political Regimes II: Democracy and Authoritarianism in the PostCold War Era

1. Huntington, Samuel P., The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth

Century(Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991), pp. 13-108.
2. Barbara Geddes, “What Do We Know about Democratization after Twenty Years?” Annual
Review of Political Science 2 (1999): 115-144.
3. Michael Ross, “Does Oil Hinder Democracy?” World Politics 53, No. 3: 325-361.
4. Steven Levitsky and Lucan A. Way, Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after
the Cold War (Cambridge University Press, forthcoming)[excerpts from chapters 1-2]
5. Michael McFaul. “The Fourth Wave of Democracy and Dictatorship: Noncooperative
Transitions in the Postcommunist World.” World Politics 54, no.2 (January 2002): 212-244.
6. Jeffrey S. Kopstein and David A. Reilly. 2000. “Geographic Diffusion and the
Transformation of the Postcommunist World.” World Politics 53, No. 1: 1-37.
7. Elisabeth Wood, "An Insurgent Path to Democracy: Popular Mobilization, Economic
Interests and Regime Transition in South Africa and El Salvador.”Comparative Political
 Studies 34, No. 8 (October 2001): 862-888.
8. Dan Slater, “Revolutions, Crackdowns, and Quiescence: Communal Elites and Democratic
Mobilization in Southeast Asia,” American Journal of Sociology 115:1 (July 2009).
9. Michael Bratton and Nicolas Van de Walle, “Neopatrimonial Regimes and Political
Transitions in Africa,” World Politics 46, No. 4 (July 1994), pp. 453-489.

Civil Society, Contentious Politics, and Social Movements

1. Mancur Olson, The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of
Groups (Harvard University Press, 1965), pp. 1-52
2. Sidney Tarrow, Power in Movement (Cambridge University Press, 1996), p. 9-27; 62-78.
3. John McCarthy and Mayer Zald, “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: a Partial
Theory” American Journal of Sociology 82 (1977), pp. 1212-41.
4. Herbert Kitschelt, “Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest,”British Journal of
Political Science, 16 (1986), pp. 57-85.
5. Kevin O’Brien, “Rightful Resistance,” World Politics 49 (1) (1996): 31-55
6. Margaret E. Keck and Kathryn Sikkink, Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in
International Politics (Cornell University Press, 1997), pp.1-29;
7. Robert Putnam, Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy(Princeton
University Press, 1993) (Chapters 3, 4, and 6), pp. 63-120; 163-185
8. Sheri Berman, “Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic”,World Politics 49
(1997), pp. 401-439
9. Robert Putnam “Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital,” Journal of
Democracy(1995)
10. Theda Skocpol, Marshall Ganz, and Ziad Munson, “A Nation of Organizers: the
Institutional Origins of Civic Voluntarism in the United States,” American Political Science
Review 94 (3) (September 2000), pp. 527-546.
11. Lily Tsai, Solidary Groups, Informal Accountability, and Local Public Goods Provision in
Rural China", American Political Science Review 101, no.2 (May 2007), pp.355-372

Ethnicity, Ethnic Conflict, and Political Violence

1. Donald L. Horowitz, Ethnic Groups in Conflict (Berkeley: University of California Press,

1985), pp. 3-89.
2. Robert Bates, “Modernization, Ethnic Competition, and the Rationality of Politics in
Contemporary Africa,” in Donald Rothchild and Victor Olorunsola, eds., State Versus Ethnic
Claims: African Policy Dilemmas (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1983), pp.153-167.
3. David Laitin, “Hegemony and Religious Conflict,” in Peter B. Evans, Dietrich
Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol, eds., Bringing the State Back In (New York: Cambridge
University Press, 1985), pp. 285-316.
4. Daniel Posner, "The Political Salience of Cultural Difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas
are Allies in Zambia and Adversaries in Malawi," American Political Science Review 98, No.
4 (November 2004), pp. 529-545.
5. James Fearon and David Laitin, “Explaining Interethnic Cooperation,”American Political
Science Review, 90, no. 4 (December 1996): 715-735.
6. Barry Posen, “The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict,” Survival 35, No. 1
(Spring 1993): 27-47.
7. James Fearon and David Laitin, “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War.”American Political
Science Review. 97(1), 2003, pp. 75-90.
8. Ashutosh Varshney, Ethnic Conflict and Civic Life: Hindus and Muslims in India (Yale
University Press, 2002), pp. 3-52.
9. Steven Wilkinson, Votes and Violence (Cambridge University Press), Chapter 1 (pp. 1-18)
10. Stathis N. Kalyvas, “Ethnic Defection in Civil War,” Comparative Political Studies, 41,
No. 8 (August 2008): 1043-1068.
11. Ashutosh Varshney, “Nationalism, Ethnic Conflict, and Rationality”Perspectives on
Politics, 1(1), 2003, pp. 85-99.
12. James Habyarimana, Macartan Humphries, Daniel N. Posner, and Jeremy M. Weinstein,
“Why Does Ethnic Diversity Undermine Public Goods Provision?” American Political
Science Review 101, No. 4 (2007): 709-725.

13. Lijphart, Arend, Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration(New Haven:

Yale University Press, 1977), pp. 1-3; 16-52 [classic work on consociationalism]

Voting, Elections, and Electoral Systems

Voters and Voting

1. John Aldrich, “Rational Choice and Turnout," American Journal of Political Science, 37,
(1993): 246-78.
2. Russell J. Dalton and Martin P. Wattenberg (eds.), Parties without Partisans: Political
Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies (Oxford University Press, 2000), chapters
2(Dalton) and 3 (Dalton, McAllister, and Wattenberg) [pp. 19-76]
3. Bingham G. Powell and Guy Whitten. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting:
Taking Account of the Political Context,” American Journal of Political Science, 37 (1993).
4. Herbert Kitschelt and Steven I. Wilkinson, “Citizen-Politician Linkages: An
Introduction,” in Herbert Kitschelt and Steven I. Wilkinson, eds. Patrons, Clients, and
Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition (Cambridge
University Press, 2007), pp. 1-46.
5. Kanchan Chandra, “Counting Heads: A Theory of Voter and Elite Behavior in Patronage
Democracies,” in Herbert Kitschelt and Steven I. Wilkinson, eds.Patrons, Clients, and
Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition (Cambridge
University Press, 2007), pp. 84-109.

Electoral Rules and their Consequences

6. Arend Lijphart, Patterns of Democracy, Ch 8 (electoral systems) (pp. 143-170)
7. Gary W. Cox, Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral
Systems(Cambridge University Press, 1997), chapters 1-3 (3-68) and 10-12 (pp. 181-
237).Recommended: chapters 4-5 (pp. 69-122)
8. John M Carey and Matthew Soberg Shugart, “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: a
Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas,” Electoral Studies 14:4 (1995): 417-439.

Explaining Electoral Design

9.Carles Boix, “Setting the Rules of the Game: The Choice of Electoral Systems in Advanced
Democracies,” American Political Science Review, 93, No. 3 (September1999): 609-624.
10. Thomas Cusack, Torben Iversen, and David Soskice “Economic Interests and the Origins
of Electoral Systems,” American Political Science Review 101, No. 3 (August 2007): 373-
391.

Political Parties and Party Systems

1. E.E. Schattschneider, Party Government (Transaction Publishers, 1942/2004), pp. 35-53.

2. Anthony Downs, An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: HarperCollins, 1957),
chapters 7-8 (pp. 96-141).
3. Seymour Martin Lipset and Stein Rokkan, “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter
Alignments: An Introduction,” in Peter Mair, ed. The West European Party System(Oxford
University Press, 2009), pp. 91-138.
4. Maurice Duverger, “Caucus and Branch, Cadre Parties and Mass Parties,” in Peter Mair,
ed. The West European Party System (Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 37-45.
5. Otto Kirchheimer, “The Catch-All Party,” in Peter Mair, ed. The West European Party
System(Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 50-60.
6. John Aldrich, Why Parties?: The Origins and Transformation of Party Politics in
America(Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995), pp. 3-61.
7. Martin Shefter, Political Parties and the State: The American Historical
Experience (Princeton University Press, 1994), chapter 2 (pp 21-60).
8. Stathis N. Kalyvas, The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe (Cornell University Press,
1996), pp. 1-28; 58-113.

Political Economy of Advanced Democracies

1. Allan H. Meltzer, and Scott. F. Richard, “A Rational Theory of the Size of

Government,” Journal of Political Economy 89 (1981), 914-17 [Read only first 3 pages.]
2. Harold Wilensky, Rich Democracies (University of California Press, 2002), pp. 3-14.
3. Evelyne Huber and John D. Stephens, Development and Crisis of the Welfare
State(University of Chicago Press, 2001), pp. 14-32.
4. Peter Katzenstein, Small States in World Markets (Cornell University Press, 1985) Chapter
1 (pp. 17-38) and Chapter 3 (pp. 80-135).
5. Gösta Esping-Andersen, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (Princeton University
Press, 1990), Chapters 1-3 (pp. 1-78).
6. Torben Iversen and David Soskice, “Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions:
Why Some Democracies Redistribute More Than Others,” American Political Science
Review 100:2 (2006):165-181.

7. Manow, Philip, “Electoral Rules, Class Coalitions, and Welfare State Regimes, or how to
Explain Esping-Andersen with Stein Rokkan” Socio-Economic Review (2009) 7: 101-121
8. Hall, Peter A., and David Soskice, Varieties of Capitalism (Oxford, Oxford University
Press, 2001), pp. 3-68.
9. Geoffrey Garrett and Peter Lange, “Political Responses to Interdependence: What’s ‘left’
for the Left?” International Organization 45, No. 4 (Autumn): 539-564.
10. Paul Pierson, “The New Politics of the Welfare State,” World Politics(1996): 143-179.
11. Jacob Hacker, “Privatizing Risk without Privatizing the Welfare State,”American Political
Science Review 98, No. 4 (2004): 243-260
社会理论与方法精读文献推荐
一、理论是什么？为什么要阅读经典？杰弗里 · 亚历山大，2008，《科学思维中的理
论逻辑》，见《社会学的理论逻辑：实证主义、预设与当前的争论》，于晓、唐省杰、
蒋和明译，北京：商务印书馆。杰弗里 · 亚历山大，2008，《经典文本的中心地位》，
《社会学基础文献选读》，冯钢编选，杭州：浙江大学出版社。
Alexander, Jeffrey C.2001.“Canons, Discourses, and Research Programs: Plurality, Progress
and Competition in Classical, Modern and Contemporary Sociology.” In Alexander(eds.).
Mainstream and Critical Social Theory: Classical, Modern and Contemporary, London:
Sage. 汉斯 · 约阿斯、沃尔夫冈 · 克诺伯，2021，《什么是理论？》，见《社会理论
二十讲》，郑作彧译，上海：上海人民出版社。 Abbott, Andrew. 2001. “The Chaos of
Disciplines.” In Chaos of Discipline. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
Abend, Gabriel. 2008. “The Meaning of 'Theory’.” Sociological Theory26:173—199.Selg,
Peeter. 2013. “The Politics of Theory and the Constitution of Meaning.” Sociological
Theory 31 (1): 1–23.
选读： Turner, Stephen P. 1983. “Contextualism and the Interpretation of the Classical
Sociological Texts.” Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture, Past and
Present 4: 273-291.Stinchcombe,Arthur L. 1982. “Should Sociologists Forget their Mothers
and their Fathers?” American Sociologist17: 2-11.Connell,R. W. 1997. “Why Is Classical
Theory Classical?” American Journal of Sociology 102: 1511-1557.Burawoy, Michael. 2021.
“Why is classical theory classical? Theorizing the canon and canonizing Du Bois.” Journal of
Classical Sociology 21(3-4):245-259.Isaac Ariail Reed and Mayer N. Zald, 2014,“The
Unsettlement of Communities of Inquiry,” In Richard Swedberg, ed.Theorizing in the Social
Sciences, Stanford University Press.Reed, Isaac and Jeffrey Alexander. 2009. “Social Science
as Reading and Performance: A Cultural-Sociological Understanding of
Epistemology”.European Journal of Social Theory 12(1): 21- 41.
二、理论如何发展？科学哲学基础：逻辑实证主义与波普尔萨米尔 · 奥卡沙，2013，
《科学哲学》，韩广忠，南京：译林出版社。陈瑞麟，2010，《否证与假说的检验》，
见《科学哲学：理论与历史》，台北：群学出版社。 Friedman, Milton. 1968. “The
Methodology of Positive Economies.” Pp 508-529 In May Brodbeck(eds). Readings in the
Philosophy of the Social Sciences. NY:Macmillan.Hempel,Carl. 1942. “The Function of
General Laws in History”.Journal of Philosophy 39 (2): 35-48.Fetzer, James, “Carl Hempel”,
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri
Nodelman (eds.), URL = </archives/fall2022/entries/hempel/>. 卡尔 · 波普尔，2019，《科
学：猜想和反驳》，见《科学哲学：有一种追问没有尽头》，江晓原主编，上海：上
海教育出版社。Thornton, Stephen, “Karl Popper”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy (Fall 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), URL =
</archives/fall2022/entries/popper/>.Creath, Richard, “Logical Empiricism”, The Stanford
Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.),
forthcoming URL = </archives/win2022/entries/logical-empiricism/>.
选读：陈瑞麟，2010，《科学哲学：理论与历史》，台北：群学出版社。威廉 ·A. 戈
顿，2018，《卡尔 · 波普尔与社会科学》，殷杰、马健译，北京 :  科学出版社。威廉
姆 · 奥斯维特，2018，《新社会科学哲学：实在论、解释学和批判理论》，殷杰、张
冀峰、蒋鹏慧译，北京 :  科学出版社。 Halfpenny, Peter. 2014. Positivism and Sociology:
Explaining Social Life.Routledge.
三、理论如何发展？科学哲学基础：库恩吴以义，2013，《科学革命的历史分析：库
恩与他的理论》，上海：复旦大学出版社。 Bird, Alexander, “Thomas Kuhn”, The
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL =
</archives/spr2022/entries/thomas-kuhn/>.托马斯 · 库恩，2022，《科学革命的结构》，
张卜天译，北京：北京大学出版社。托马斯 · 库恩，2012，《结构之后的路》，邱慧
译，北京：北京大学出版社。托马斯 · 库恩，2004，《必要的张力：科学研究的传统
和创新》、《对范式的再思考》，《发现的逻辑还是研究的心理学》，见《必要的张
力：科学的传统和变革论文选》，范岱年、纪树立译，   北京：北京大学出版社。迈
克尔 · 弗里德曼，2013，《库恩和逻辑经验主义》，见托马斯 · 尼科尔编，《托马
斯 · 库恩》，魏洪钟译，上海：复旦大学出版社。
选读：托马斯 · 库恩，2020，《哥白尼革命：西方思想发展中的行星天文学》，吴国
盛、张东林、李立译，北京：北京大学出版社。托马斯 · 库恩，2004，《必要的张力：
科学的传统和变革论文选》，范岱年、纪树立译，   北京：北京大学出版社。托马
斯 · 尼科尔斯编，2013，《托马斯 · 库恩》，魏洪钟译，上海：复旦大学出版社。加
里 · 古廷，2013，《托马斯 · 库恩和法国科学哲学》，见托马斯 · 尼科尔斯编，《托
马斯 · 库恩》，魏洪钟译，上海：复旦大学出版社。米歇尔 · 比特博尔、让 · 伽永，
2011，《法国认识论： 1830-1970 》，郑天喆、莫伟民译，北京：商务印书馆。加斯
东 · 巴什拉，2022，《科学精神的形成》，钱培鑫译，上海 :  东方出版中心。
四、理论如何发展？科学哲学基础：拉卡托斯与法伊尔阿本德伊姆雷 · 拉卡托斯，
2005，《科学研究纲领方法论》，兰征译，上海：上海译文出版社。约翰 · 沃勒尔，
2013《常规科学和教条主义，范式和进步：库恩 “ 对 ” 波普尔、拉卡托斯》，见托马
斯 · 尼科尔编，《托马斯 · 库恩》，魏洪钟译，上海：复旦大学出版社。保罗 · 法伊
尔阿本德，2007，《反对方法》，周昌忠译，上海 :  上海译文出版社。Preston,
John, “Paul Feyerabend”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020 Edition),
Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = </archives/fall2020/entries/feyerabend/>.Baghramian, Maria
and J. Adam Carter, “Relativism”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2022
Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = </archives/spr2022/entries/relativism/>.
五、科学社会学的视角 Goldman, Alvin and Cailin O’Connor, 'Social Epistemology', The
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL =
</archives/win2021/entries/epistemology-social/>.赵万里，2002，《科学的社会建构 :  科
学知识社会学的理论与实践》，天津：天津人民出版社。迈克尔 · 马尔凯，2001，
《科学与知识社会学》，林聚任译，北京：东方出版社。史蒂文 · 夏平、西蒙 · 谢弗，
《利维坦与空气泵：霍布斯、玻意耳与实验生活》，蔡佩君、区立远译，上海：上海
人民出版社。大卫 · 布鲁尔，2014，《知识和社会意象》，霍桂恒译，北京 :  中国人
民大学出版社。 Bloor,David.1999. “'Anti-Latour’.” Studies in History and Philosophy of
Science30(1): 81-112.Latour,Bruno. 1999. “'For Bloor and Beyond – A Reply to David
Bloor’s Anti-Latour’.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30(1):113-129.D.布鲁尔，
2008, 《反拉图尔论》，张敦敏译，《世界哲学》，第 4 期。B.拉图尔，2008，《答
复 D· 布鲁尔的 < 反拉图尔论 > 》，张敦敏译，《世界哲学》，第 4 期。大卫 · 布鲁
尔，2014，《知识和社会意象》，霍桂恒译，北京 :  中国人民大学出版社。布鲁诺 ·
拉图尔，2005，《科学在行动：怎样在社会中跟随科学家和工程师》，刘文旋、郑开
译，北京：东方出版社。布鲁诺 · 拉图，2016，《巴斯德的实验室：细菌的战争与和
平》，伍启鸿、陈荣泰译，台北：群学。布鲁诺 · 拉图尔，2022，《我们从未现代过：
对称性人类学论集》，刘鹏、安涅思译，上海 :  上海文艺出版社。
选读：Knorr Cetina, Karin.1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make
Knowledge. Harvard University Press.Hacking, Ian 1999. The Social Construction of What?
Harvard University Press.Latour, Bruno.2007. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to
Actor-Network Theory. Oxford University Press
六、社会科学理论如何发展？帕森斯和默顿罗伯特 ·K.  默顿， 2008, 《论社会学的中
层理论》、《经验研究对社会学理论的影响》，见《社会理论和社会结构》，唐少杰、
齐心等译，南京：译林出版社。塔尔科特 · 帕森斯，2012，《序言》、《绪论》，见
《社会行动的结构》，张明德、夏遇南、彭刚译，南京：译林出版社。吉利斯，
2014，《迪昂论题与蒯因论题》，见《当代哲学经典：科学哲学卷》，北京：北京师
范大学出版社。 Kemp, Stephen. 2017.“Transformational Fallibilism and the Development
of Understanding.” Social Epistemology 31(2):192–209.Lieberson, Stanley and Freda B.
Lynn 2002. “Barking Up the Wrong Branch: Scientific Alternatives to the Current Model of
Sociological Science.” Annual Review of Sociology28: 1-19.Fuhse, Jan A. 2022. “How Can
Theories Represent Social Phenomena?”Sociology Theory 40(2) ： 99-123.
选读： Stinchcombe, Arthur L.1987. Constructing Social Theory. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.Stinchcombe, Arthur L. 2005,The Logic of Social Research. Chicago: The
University of Chicago Press.Arthur L. Stinchcombe ，2012，《社会科学研究的逻辑》，
谢明珊、徐筱琦译，新北：韦伯文化出版。 Stinchcombe, Arthur L.1987. Constructing
Social Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 阿瑟 · 斯汀奇库姆，《社会史的理
论方法》，王东宇译，待出版。
七、社会科学理论如何发展？从扎根理论到拓展个案法再到溯因分析Corbin, Juliet and
Anselm Strauss. 1990. “Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative
Criteria.” Qualitative Sociology 13(1):3-21.Charmaz, Kathy. 2003. “Grounded Theory:
Objectivist and Constructivist Methods.” In NormanK. Denzin and Yvonna S.
Lincoln(eds.) Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage. 麦克 · 布洛维，
2007，《拓展个案法》，见麦克 · 布洛维，《公共社会学》，沈原译，北京 :  社会科
学文献出版社。 Burawoy, Michael. 2000. “Reaching for the Global.” Pp1-39. In Michael.
Burawoy et al., Global Ethnography . Berkeley: University of California Press. 米切尔 · 邓
奈尔，2019，《附录：研究方法陈述》，见《人行道王国》，马景超、刘冉、王一凡
译，上海 :  华东师范大学出版社。托马斯 · 尼科尔斯，2013，《常规科学：从逻辑到
基于案例和基于模型的推理》，见托马斯 · 尼科尔编，《托马斯 · 库恩》，魏洪钟译，
上海：复旦大学出版社。麦克 · 布洛维，2007，《拓展个案法》，见麦克 · 布洛维，
《公共社会学》，沈原译，北京 :  社会科学文献出版社。 Tavory, Iddo and Stefan
Timmermans. 2009.“Two Cases of Ethnography: Case, Narrative and Theory in Grounded
Theory and the Extended Case Method.”Ethnography 10(3): 243-263.Timmermans, Stefan,
Iddo Tavory.2012. ”Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to
abductive analysis. “ Social Theory 30(3):167-186.Swedberg,Richard. 2012. “Theorizing in
sociology and social science: Turning to the context of discovery.” Theory and
Society 41(1):1-40.
选读： Glaser, Barney G. and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory:
Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co.Charmaz, Kathy.
2014. Constructing Grounded Theory. Sage 凯西 · 卡麦兹，2009，《建构扎根理论：质
性研究实践指南》，边国英译，重庆 :  重庆大学出版社。徐淑英、任兵、吕力主编，
2016，《管理理论构建论文集》，北京：北京大学出版社。Burawoy,
Michael.2009. The Extended Case Method:Four Countries, Four Decades, Four Great
Transformations, and One Theoretical Tradition.Berkeley: University of California
Press.Tavory, Iddo and Stefan Timmermans. 2014. Abductive Analysis: Theorizing
Qualitative Research. University of Chicago Press.Timmermans, Stefan andIddo
Tavory.2022. Data Analysis in Qualitative Research: Theorizing with Abductive Analysis.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
八、社会科学理论如何发展？案例与模型托马斯 · 尼科尔斯，2013，《常规科学：从
逻辑到基于案例和基于模型的推理》，见托马斯 · 尼科尔编，《托马斯 · 库恩》，魏
洪钟译，上海：复旦大学出版社。Emigh, Rebecca Jean.1997. “The Power of Negative
Thinking: The Use of Negative Case Methodology in the Development of Sociological
Theory.”Theory and Society 26(5 ): 649–84.Vaughan, Diane. 1992. “Theory Elaboration: The
Heuristics of Case Analysis.” Pp. 173-202 In Ragin, Charles C., and Howard Saul
Becker(eds.) What is a Case?:Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry. Cambridge
university press.Vaughan, Diane. 2014.“Analogy, Cases, and Comparative Social
Organization. ” Pp. 61-84.In R. Swedberg (eds.) Theorizing in social science: The context of
discovery. Stanford University Press.Desmond, Matthew. 2014. “Relational
Ethnography.”Theory and Society 43(5):547–79Burawoy, Michael. 2017. “On Desmond: The
Limits of Spontaneous Sociology.”Theory and Society 46(4):261–84.Gorski, Philip S. 2004.
“The Poverty of Deductivism: A Constructive Realist Model of Sociological
Explanation.” Sociological Methodology34(1): 1-33.Steinmetz G. 2004. “ Odious
Comparisons: Incommensurability, the Case Study, and 'Small N’s’ in Sociology.
”Sociological Theory 22(3):371-400.Lichterman, Paul and Isaac Ariail Reed. 2015. “Theory
and Contrastive Explanation in Ethnography.”Sociological Methods & Research 44(4):585–
635.Abend, Gabriel. 2022.“Making Things Possible”, Sociological Methods &
Research51(1): 68–107. 吉尔，2014，《科学的认知进路》，见《当代哲学经典：科学
哲学卷》，北京：北京师范大学出版社。 Frigg, Roman and Stephan Hartmann, 'Models
in Science', The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta
(ed.), URL = </archives/spr2020/entries/models-science/>.
选读：马修 · 德斯蒙德， 2022, 《扫地出门：美国城市的贫穷与暴利》，胡䜣谆、郑
焕升译，太原：山西教育出版社。玛丽 ·S· 摩根，2021，《模型中的世界》，梁双陆、
刘燕译，北京 :  社会科学文献出版社。唐世平，2021，《观念 行动 结果：社会科
学方法新论》，天津：天津人民出版社。George, Alexander and Andrew Bennett.
2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT
Press.Abramson, Corey M., and Neil Gong, eds. 2020. Beyond the Case: the Logics and
Practices of Comparative Ethnography. Oxford University Press.
九、回到经典：《新教伦理与资本主义精神》韦伯的行动理论马克斯 · 韦伯，2018，
《新教伦理与资本主义精神》，阎克文译，上海 :  上海人民出版社。
Weber ， Max.2002.The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism.
Penguin.Weber ， Max.2011.The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Oxford
University Press. 马克斯 · 韦伯，2021，《宗教社会学 宗教与世界》，康乐、简惠美
译，上海三联书店，选读。马克斯 · 韦伯，2021，《社会科学的基本概念   经济行动
与社会团体》，康乐、简惠美译，上海：上海三联书店 , 选读。杰弗里 · 亚历山大，
2005，《形式意志论与实质意志论》，见《二十世纪西方社会理论文选：社会理论的
开端和终结》，渠东、汲喆译，上海：上海三联书店。斯蒂芬 · 卡尔博格，2020，
《韦伯的比较历史社会学今探》，张翼飞、殷亚迪译，上海：上海人民出版社。
Turner, Stephen P. 1983. “Weber on Action.” American Sociological Review 48: 506-
519Campbell.Colin. 1996 “On the Concept of Motive in Sociology.” Sociology30 (1): 101-
114.—— 2006.“Do Today’s Sociologists Really Appreciate Weber’s essay The Protestant
Ethic and Spirit of Capitalism?” Sociological Review54 (2) :207-223.——
2009.“Distinguishing the Power of Agency from Agentic Power: A Note on Weber and the
'Black Box’of Personal Agency”Sociological Theory 27 (4): 407-418.Biernacki, Richard.
2005. “The Action Turn? Comparative-Historical Inquiry beyond the Classical Models of
Conduct.” Pp. 75-91 In Julia Adams, Elisabeth S. Clemens and Ann Shola Orloff
(eds.), Remaking Modernity: Politics, History, and Sociology. Durham: Duke University
Press.
选读： Lash Scott andWhimster Sam(eds.), Max Weber ：Rationality and Modernity.
London: Allen & Unwin.
十、行动理论：从帕森斯到现象学社会学汉斯 · 约阿斯、沃尔夫冈 · 克诺伯，2021，
《社会理论二十讲》，郑作彧译，上海：上海人民出版社， 2-4 、 7 讲。杰西 · 洛佩
兹、约翰 · 斯科特，2007，《制度结构》，见《社会结构》，允春喜译，吉林 :  吉林
人民出版社。 Parsons, Talcott. 1938, “The Role of Ideas in Social Action.” American
Sociological Review 3:652–64.Parsons, Talcott. 1972, “Culture and Social System
Revisited.” Social Science Quarterly 53(2):253-266.Barber, Michael, “Alfred Schutz”, The
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL =
</archives/sum2022/entries/schutz/>. 许茨，2017，《社会世界的意义建构：理解的社会
学引论》，霍桂恒译，北京：北京师范大学出版社。舒茨 , 阿尔弗雷德 ·2012 ，《社
会世界的意义构成》，游淙祺译，北京：商务印书馆。克劳斯 · 黑尔德，2016，《导
言》，见《生活世界现象学》，埃德蒙德 · 胡塞尔著、克劳斯 · 黑尔德，《生活世界
现象学》，倪梁康、张廷国译，上海：上海译文出版社。彼得 ·L.  伯格、托马斯 · 卢
克曼，2019，《现实的社会建构：知识社会学论纲》，吴肃然译，北京大学出版社。
Heiskala, Risto.2011.“The Meaning of Meaning in Sociology. The Achievements and
Shortcomings of Alfred Schutz’s Phenomenological Sociology. ”Journal for the Theory of
Social Behaviour 41(3):231-246Garfinkel, Harold. 1964. “Studies of the routine grounds of
everyday activities.” Social Problems11(3): 225-250.Garfinkel, Harold.1984. “What is
Ethnomethodology” Pp1-34. In Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press
选读赵立玮，2018，《规范与自由：帕森斯社会理论研究》，商务印书馆。Neil
Gross ，2007， “ Pragmatism, Phenomenology, and Twentieth-Century American
Sociology” ， 183-224 ， In Craig Calhoun (ed.), Sociology in America: A
History， University Of Chicago Press.Rawls, Anne Warfieldand Turowetz, Jason. 2019.
“Discovering Culture in Interaction: Solving Problems in Cultural Sociology by Recovering
the Interactional Side of Parsons’ Conception of Culture”. American Journal of Cultural
Sociology 9:293–320.Rawls, Anne Warfield.2009.“An essay on two conceptions of social
order: constitutive orders of action, objects and identities vs aggregated orders of individual
action. ”Journal of Classical Sociology 9(4):500-520.Rawls, Anne
Warfield.2011.“Wittgenstein, Durkheim, Garfinkel and Winch:Constitutive Orders of
Sensemaking. ”Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 41(4):396-418.King, Anthony.
2009, “Overcoming Structure and Agency: Talcott Parsons, Ludwig Wittgenstein and the
Theory of Social Action.” Journal of Classical Sociology, 9(2):260–288.
十一、行动理论：符号互动论赫伯特 · 布鲁默， 2005, 《论符号互动论的方法论》，
霍桂桓译，见《二十世纪西方社会理论文选   II ：社会理论的诸理论》，苏国勋、刘
小枫编，上海：上海三联书店。 Blumer, Herbert. 1986. “The Methodological Position of
Symbolic Interactionism” and “What is Wrong with Social Theory” Symbolic Interactionism:
Perspective and Method(pp. 1-60;140-152). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of
California Press. 欧文 · 戈夫曼，2022，《日常生活中的自我呈现》，冯钢译，北京 : 
北京大学出版社Goffman, Erving. 1974. “Introduction” and “The Anchoring of
Activity”, Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience (pp. 1-16; 247-300).
New York: Harper Colophon.Goffman, Erving.1983.“The Interaction Order. American
Sociological Association 1982 Presidential Address. ”American Sociological Review 48:1-
17.Tavory, Iddo. 2016. “Interactionism: Self and Meaning as Process.” Pp. 85-98 In Seth
Abrutyn (ed.) Handbook of Contemporary Sociological Theory. Springer.Eliasoph, Nina and
Lichterman, Paul. 2003.“ Culture in interaction.”American Journal of Sociology 108(4):735-
794.Fine, Gary Alan. 1979. “Small Groups and Culture Creation: The Idioculture of Little
League Baseball Teams.” American Sociological Review 44: 733-745.Fine, Gary Alan. 1992.
“The Culture of Production: Aesthetic Choices and Constraints in Culinary Work.” American
Journal of Sociology 97(5):1268–94.Fine, Gary Alan. 1993.“Ten Lies of
Ethnography.”Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 22(3):267- 94.Fine, Gary Alan. 2003.
“Crafting Authenticity: The Validation of Identity in Self-Taught Art.” Theory and
Society 32(2):153–180.Fine, Gary Alan. 2010. “The Sociology of the Local: Action and its
Publics.” Sociological Theory 28(4), 355-376.Fine,Gary Alan and Iddo Tavory. 2019.
“Interactionism in the Twenty-First Century: On Being-in-a-Meaningful-World.” Symbolic
Interaction 42(3): 457-467.Tavory, Iddo and Gary Alan Fine. 2020. “Disruption and the
Theory of the Interaction Order.” Theory and Society 49(3): 365-385.
选读Turner, Jonathan H. 1988. A Theory of Social Interaction. Stanford University
PressGriswold, Wendy. 2008. Cultures and Societies in a Changing World. Thousand Oaks,
CA: Pine Forge Press. 欧文 · 戈夫曼， 2022, 《污名：受损身份管理札记》，宋立宏译，
北京 :  商务印书馆。盖瑞 · 阿兰 · 法恩，2018，《日常天才：自学艺术和本真性文
化》， 卢文超、王夏歌译，南京：译林出版社理查德 ·A.  彼得森，2017，理查德
·A.  彼得森，《创造乡村音乐：本真性之制造》，卢文超译，南京：译林出版社。戴
维 ·A. 卡普，2022，《诉说忧伤：抑郁症的社会学分析》，幸君珺、萧易忻译，上海：
上海教育出版社。王晴锋，2019，《欧文 · 戈夫曼与情境互动论》，北京：社会科学
文献出版社。
十二、行动理论：米德乔治 ·H.  米德，2018，《心灵、自我与社会》，赵月瑟译，上
海：上海译文出版社。乔治 · 赫伯特 · 米德，2014，《心灵、自我和社会》，霍桂桓
译，南京：译林出版社。Mead, George Herbert. 2015. Mind, Self and Society: The
Definitive Edition. edited by D. R. Huebner, J. Hans, and C. W. Morris. Chicago ; London:
University of Chicago Press.Blumer, Herbert. 1966. “Sociological Implications of the
Thought of George Herbert Mead.”American Journal of Sociology, 71(5): 535-544.Hans Joas.
1997. “George Herbert Mead and the Renaissance of American Pragmatism” In Camic,
Charles ed ， Reclaiming the Sociological Classics ， Malden:Blackwell PubJoas, Hans.
2000.“The emergence of the new: Mead's theory and its contemporary potential.” In G. Ritzer
& B. Smart (eds.), Handbook of social theory (pp. 89-99). London: SageCallero, Peter. L.
2003. The Sociology of the Self. Annual Review of Sociology, 29(1):115–133.Somers,
Margaret R. 1994. “The Narrative Constitution of Identity: A Relational andNetwork
Approach.” Theory and Society 23(5): 605-49.Aboulafia, Mitchell. “George Herbert Mead”,
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.),
URL = </archives/sum2022/entries/mead/>.
选读 Joas, Hans. 1997. G. H. Mead: A Contemporary Re-examination of His Thought, The
MIT PressHuebner, Daniel R. 2014. Becoming Mead: The Social Process of Academic
Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Baldwin,John D. 1986. George Herbert
Mead: A Unifying Theory for Sociology,Sage Publishing Co.
十三、行动理论亚历山大 Alexander, Jeffrey C. 1988.Action and its environments: Toward
a new synthesis. New York: Columbia University Press.Alexander, Jeffrey C. 1990.“Analytic
debates: Understanding the relative autonomy of culture.” Pp1-27 In Alexander, J. C. and
Seidman, S(eds.).Culture and Society: Contemporary Debates.,New York:Cambridge
University Press.Alexander, Jeffrey C and Philip Smith. 2005. “The Strong Program in
Cultural Sociology: Elements of a Structural Hermeneutics.” Pp. 11-26 In The Meanings of
Social Life: A Cultural Sociology.Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2006. “Introduction: Symbolic Action
in Theory and Practice: The Cultural Pragmatics of Symbolic Action.” In J. Alexander, B.
Giesen, and J. Mast(eds.).Social Performance: Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics and
Ritual. Cambridge University Press.Alexander, Jeffrey and Philip Smith. 2010. “The Strong
Program: Origins, Achievements, Prospects” in Hall, J., Grindstaff, L., & Lo, M.
(eds.)Handbook of Cultural Sociology . London:Routledge(Pp. 13-24). 杰弗里 · 亚历山大，
2015，《社会表演理论：在仪式和策略之间建立文化语用学模型》，侯园园译，《社
会》第 3-4 期。
十四、行动理论新实用主义：行动的创造性汉斯 · 约阿斯、沃尔夫冈 · 克诺伯，
2021，《新实用主义》，见《社会理论二十讲》，郑作彧译，上海：上海人民出版社。
Joas, Hans and Jens Beckert ，2001， “ Action Theory.”In Jonathan H. Turner
(eds.), Handbook of Sociological Theory( Pp269–285). New York: Kluwer Academic
Publishers.Joas, Hans. 1996. The Creativity of Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.Camic,
Charles. 1998. “Reconstructing the Theory of Action.”Sociological Theory16(3):283–
291.McGowan,John.1998.“Toward a Pragmatist Theory of Action.”Sociological
Theory 16(3):292–297.Dalton, Benjamin.2004.“ Creativity, Habit, and the Social Products of
Creative Action: Revising Joas, Incorporating Bourdieu. ”Sociological Theory, 22(4):603-
622Whitford, Josh. 2002.“Pragmatism and the untenable dualism of means and ends: Why
rational choice theory does not deserve paradigmatic privilege. ”Theory and
Society 31(3):325-363.Swidler, Ann. 1986 ， “ Culture in Action: Symbols and
Strategies.” American Sociological Review 51:273-286 安 · 斯维德勒，2022，《行动中的
文化：象征与策略》，见周怡等编译《文化社会学：经典与前沿》，北京：北京大学
出版社。Swidler, Ann. 2001. Talk of love: How culture matters. University of Chicago
PressVaisey, Stephen. 2008. “Socrates, skinner, and aristotle: Three ways of thinking about
 culture in action.” Sociological Forum 23:603–613Swidler, Ann. 2008. “ Comment on
stephen vaisey’s 'socrates, skinner, and aristotle: Three ways of thinking about culture in
action. “Sociological Forum 23:614–618.
选读：约翰 · 杜威，2012，《达尔文主义对哲学的影响》、《实用主义所说的 “ 实践
的 ” 是什么意思》、《实在具有实践特征吗》，见《杜威全集 · 中期著作（ 1899-
1924） · 第四卷（ 1907-1909 ）》，陈亚军、姬志闯译，上海：华东师范大学出版社。
约翰 · 杜威，2012，《杜威全集 · 中期著作（ 1899-1924 ） · 第十四卷（1922）》，
罗跃军译，上海：华东师范大学出版社。 Gross, Neil., Isaac Ariail Reed and Christopher
Winship(eds.) 2022.The New Pragmatist Sociology: Inquiry, Agency, and Democracy.
Columbia University Press.Legg, Catherine and Christopher Hookway, “Pragmatism”, The
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL =
</archives/sum2021/entries/pragmatism/>.Hildebrand, David, “John Dewey”, The Stanford
Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL =
</archives/win2021/entries/dewey/>.
十五、行动理论新实用主义：时间性乔治 · 赫伯特 · 米德，2003，《现在的哲学》，
李猛译，上海：上海人民出版社。安德鲁 · 阿伯特，2021，《结果的概念》，见《过
程社会学》，周忆粟译，北京：北京师范大学出版社。 Joas, Hans.1997.G. H. Mead: A
Contemporary Re-examination of His Thought. The MIT Press ，Ch8.Emirbayer, Mustafa
and Ann Mische.1998. “What is agency? ”American Journal of Sociology 103(4):9620-
1023Hitlin.Sand Glen H. Elder Jr. 2007.“Time, Self, and the Curiously Abstract Concept of
Agency.” Sociological Theory 25(2):170-191.Beckert, Jens. 2013. “Imagined Futures:
Fictional Expectations in the Economy.” Theory and Society 42(3): 219-40Tavory, Iddoand
Nina Eliasoph. 2013.“Coordinating Futures: Toward a Theory of Anticipation.” American
Journal of Sociology 118(4): 908-942.
选读 Abbott, Andrew.2001.Time Matters: On Theory and Method.Chicago:University of
Chicago.PressBeckert, Jens.2016.Imagined Futures: Fictional Expectations and Capitalist
Dynamics. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2016.Hayes, Adam. S. 2020.“The
Behavioral Economics of Pierre Bourdieu.' Sociological Theory 38(1):16–35
十六、行动理论结构主义与实用主义（ 1 ）查尔斯 · 皮尔士，2007，《信念的确定》、
《如何使我们的观念清楚明白》，见苏珊 · 哈克、陈波等编译《意义、真理与行动》，
东方出版社。 Gross, Neil. 2010.“Charles Tilly and American Pragmatism. ” The American
Sociologist41 （ 4 ） : 337–57.Camic, Charles.1986.“The Matter of Habit.”American
Journal of Sociology 91: 1039-1087. 皮埃尔，布迪厄，2012，《实践感》，蒋梓骅译，
译林出版社，第 1-9 章。皮耶，布赫迪厄，2012，《田野中的哲学工作》、《从规则
到策略》、《法典化》，见皮耶，布赫迪厄，《所述之言》，陈逸淳译，台北：麦田。
Brubaker, Rogers. 1985. “Rethinking Classical Theory: The Sociological Vision of Pierre
Bourdieu.” Theory and Society 14: 745-775.Shusterman ， Richard .1999.“Bourdieu and
Anglo-American Philosophy.” In Richard Shusterman, Richard （ eds. ） Bourdieu ：A
Critical Reader (Pp14-28).Wiley-BlackwellAboulafia,Mitchell. 1999.“A (neo) American
inParis: Bourdieu, Mead, and Pragmatism.”In Richard Shusterman,
Richard （ eds. ） Bourdieu ： A Critical Reader (Pp153-174). Wiley-BlackwellCroce,
Mariano. 2015. “The Habitus and the Critique of the Present.” Sociological Theory
33(4):327–346.Timmermans, Stefan, and Iddo Tavory. 2020.“RacistEncounters: A Pragmatist
Semiotic Analysis of Interaction.” Sociological Theory 38(4):295-317.
十七、行动理论结构主义与实用主义（ 2 ） Lizardo, Omar. 2004. “The cognitive origins
of Bourdieu's habitus.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34(4):375-401.Ignatow,
Gabe. 2007. 'Theories of embodied knowledge: new directions for cultural and cognitive
sociology?.'Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 37(2), 115-135.Vaisey, Stephen.
2009, 'Motivation and Justification: A Dual‐Process Model of Culture in Action.' American
Journal of Sociology 114: 1675–1715.Lizardo, Omar and Michael Strand. 2010.”Skills,
Toolkits, Contexts and Institutions: Clarifying the Relationship between Different Approaches
to Cognition in Cultural Sociology. ”Poetics 38: 205–28.Lizardo, O. (2011). Pierre Bourdieu
as a post-cultural theorist. Cultural Sociology 5(1), 25-44.Strand Michael and Omar Lizardo.
2015.“Beyond World Images: Belief as Embodied Action in the World.” Sociological
Theory 33(1):44-70.Strand, Michael and Omar Lizardo. 2017. “The Hysteresis Effect:
Theorizing Mismatch in Action.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 47 (2): 164–
94.Lizardo, Omar. 2017. “Improving Cultural Analysis: Considering Personal Culture in its
Declarative and Nondeclarative Modes.” American Sociological Review 82(1):88–115.Lahire,
Bernard. 2003. “From the Habitus to and Individual Heritage of Dispositions. Towards a
Sociology at the Level of the Individual.” Poetics 31:329-55.Lahire, Bernard. 2011. The
Plural Actor. New York: Polity Press
十八、韦伯的理性化文化与新制度主义 Scaff, Lawrence. 2000. “Weber on the Cultural
Situation of the Modern Age.” In Stephen Turner (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to
Weber(Pp. 99-116). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press 保罗 · 迪马吉奥、沃尔特 · 鲍
威尔，2008，《组织分析的新制度主义》，姚伟译，上海：上海人民出版社。
Krücken, Georgand Drori, Gili S. 2010. World Society:The Writings of John W.
Meyer,Oxford :Oxford University Press.帕特丽夏 ·H. 桑顿、威廉 · 奥卡西奥、龙思博，
2020，《制度逻辑：制度如何塑造人和组织》，汪少卿、杜运周、翟慎霄、张容榕译，
杭州 :  浙江大学出版社。
十九、回到经典：《韦伯方法论文集》马克斯 · 韦伯，2013，《在 “ 文化科学的逻
辑 ” 这个领域的一些批判性的研究》、《社会科学的与社会政策的知识之 “ 客观
性 ” 》，《韦伯方法论文集》，张旺山译，台北：联经出版社。马克斯 · 韦伯，
2021，《社会科学与社会政策认识的 “ 客观性 ” 》，见《学术与政治》，阎克文译，
上海：上海人民出版社。马克斯 · 韦伯，2021，《社会科学的基本概念》，见《社会
科学的基本概念   经济行动与社会团体》，康乐、简惠美译，上海：上海三联书店。
选读行动部分马克斯 · 韦伯，2019，《社会科学的基本术语》，见《经济与社会（第
一卷）》，阎克文译，上海：上海人民出版社。Weber, Max. 2012. Max Weber:
Collected Methodological Writings. Routledge.Weber, Max. 2019.Economy and Society: A
New Translation,Harvard University Press.
选读： Bruun, Hans Henrik Bruun.2007.Science, Values and Politics in Max Weber's
Methodology. Ashgate Pub CoHirschman, Daniel andIsaac Ariail Reed. “Formation Stories
and Causality in Sociology” ，   Sociological Theory 32(4): 259- 282 格奥尔格 ·G.  伊格
尔斯，2021，《德国的历史观》，彭刚、顾杭译，北京 :  商务印书馆。
二十、解释与理解（一）朱迪亚 · 珀尔、达纳 · 麦肯齐，2019，《因果关系之梯》，
见《为什么：关于因果关系的新科学》，江生、于华译，北京 :  中信出版集团股份有
限公司。加里 · 金、罗伯特 · 基欧汉、悉尼 · 维巴，2014，《社会科学中的 “ 科
学 ” 》，见《社会科学中的研究设计》，陈硕，上海 :  格致出版社。加里 · 格尔茨、
詹姆斯 · 马奥尼，2016，《第一部分：因果模型与推断》，见《两种传承》，刘军译，
上海 :  格致出版社。 Gorski, Philip S. 2009. “Social 'Mechanisms’And Comparative-
Historical Sociology: A Critical Realist Proposal” In Peter Hedström and Björn
Wittrock （eds.) Frontiers of Sociology（ Pp147-194 ） ,Leiden · Boston ：
Brill.Woodward, James and Lauren Ross, “Scientific Explanation”, The Stanford
Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL =
</archives/sum2021/entries/scientific-explanation/>.Galavotti, Maria Carla, 'Wesley Salmon',
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri
Nodelman (eds.), URL = </archives/fall2022/entries/wesley-salmon/>.Chakravartty, Anjan,
“Scientific Realism”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition),
Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = </archives/sum2017/entries/scientific-realism/>.
选读：珍妮特 .M. 博克斯—斯蒂芬斯迈埃尔等编，2021，《牛津政治学研究方法手
册》，臧雷振、傅琼译，北京：人民出版社。 Judea Pearl 、 Madelyn
Glymour 、 Nicholas P.Jewell ，2020，《统计因果推理入门》，杨矫云、安宁、李廉
译，北京 :  高等教育出版社。 Morgan, Stephen L. 2013.Handbook of Causal Analysis for
Social Research.New York: Springer.Morgan, Stephen L and Christopher Winship.
2014. Counterfactuals and Causal Inference. Cambridge University Press.Huntington-
Klein ， Nick. 2021.The Effect ： An Introduction to Research Design and Causality.
Routledge.Gilbert, Margaret. 1989. On Social Facts. Princeton: Princeton University
Press.Abbott, Andrew.1998. “The causal devolution.” Sociological Methods and Research 27
(2): 148–181Andrew, Abbott. 1988. “Transcending General Linear Reality.” Sociological
Theory 6: 169-186.Abend, Gabriel, Caitlin Petre and Michael Sauder. 2013. “Styles of Causal
Thought: An Empirical Investigation.” American Journal of Sociology 119(3): 602-654.Reiss,
Julian. 2009. “Causation in the Social Sciences: Evidence, Inference, and
Purpose.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39(1): 20–40.
二十一、解释与理解（二）克利福德 · 格尔茨，2012，《深描说：迈向文化的解释理
论》，见《文化的解释》，韩莉译，南京：译林出版社。 Taylor, Charles. 1985.
“Interpretation and the sciences of man.” In Philosophy and the Human Sciences:
Philosophical Papers 2, edited by Charles Taylor. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University
PressReed, Isaac. 2008. “Justifying Sociological Knowledge: From Realism to
Interpretation.” Sociological Theory 26 (2): 101–29.Reed, Isaac A. 2016 ， “ What is
Interpretive Explanation in Sociohistorical Analysis?” In Georgia Warnke(eds.) Inheriting
Gadamer: New Directions in Philosophical Hermeneutics. Edinburgh University Press.Gross,
Neil. 2009.“A Pragmatist Theory of Social Mechanisms.” American Sociological
Review 74(3):358-379.Tavory, Iddo and Stefan Timmermans. 2013. “A Pragmatist Approach
to Causality in Ethnography.” American Journal of Sociology 119(3): 682-714.Iddo Tavory
and Stefan Timmermans. 2018. “Mechanisms” In Coli Jerolmack and Sheamus Khan
(eds.),Approaches to Ethnography. Analysis and Representation in Participant Observation.
Oxford: Oxford University PressKnight, Carly R andIsaac A.Reed. 2019. “Meaning and
Modularity: The Multivalence of 'Mechanism’ in Sociological Explanation.” Sociological
Theory 37(3): 234-256.
选读理查德·J.伯恩斯坦，2008，《社会政治理论的重构》，黄瑞祺译，南京：译林出
版社。冯 · 赖特，2016，《解释与理解》，张留华译，杭州：浙江大学出版社。
Reed, Isaac A. 2011. Interpretation And SocialKnowledge: On the Use of Theory in the
Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Zammito, John H.2004.A Nice
Derangement of Epistemes:Post-Positivism in the Study of Science from Quine to
Latour.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.Steinmetz, George. The politics of method in the
human sciences: Positivism and its epistemological others, politics, history, and culture.
Durham: Duke University Press
二十二、终章   世界的意义图景再生产、不确定性与风险感知、认同、极化 ... 陈忠，
2018，《乡村基础教育的 “ 放弃 ” 现象研究》，见《北大清华人大社会学硕士论文选
编（2018）》，储卉娟、卢晖临、晋军、李丁编，北京：中国发展出版社。陈莹骄，
2019，《洞察、抱负与突围：关于乡村教育的质性研究》，见《北大清华人大社会学
硕士论文选编（2019）》，储卉娟、卢晖临、晋军、李丁编，北京：中国发展出版社。
克利福德 · 格尔茨，2012，《文化的解释》，韩莉译，南京：译林出版社。阿莉 · 拉
塞尔 · 霍赫希尔德，2020，《故土的陌生人：美国保守派的愤怒与哀痛》，夏凡译，
北京 :  社会科学文献出版社保罗 · 威利斯，2022，《学做工：工人阶级子弟为何继承
父业（45周年纪念版）》，秘舒、凌旻华译，南京 :  译林出版社。 Lareau, Annette.
2015. “Cultural Knowledge and Social Inequality.” American Sociological Review 80(1):1–
27. 乔治 · 莱考夫、马克 ·  约翰逊，2015，《我们赖以生存的隐喻》，何文忠译，杭
州：浙江大学出版社。瑞秋 · 谢尔曼，2022，《不安之街：财富的焦虑》，黄炎宁译，
上海 :  华东师范大学出版社。玛丽 · 道格拉斯，2020，《洁净与危险》，黄剑波、柳
博赟、卢忱译，北京：商务印书馆。玛丽 · 道格拉斯，2022，《风险的接受》，熊畅
译，上海：华东师范大学出版社。 Mary Douglas. 1986. How Institutions Think. Syracuse,
NY: Syracuse University Press.Kahan, Dan, Hank Jenkins-Smith and Donald Braman. 2011.
“Cultural Cognition of Scientific Consensus.” Journal of Risk Research 14(2): 147-74John
Tulloch ，2008， “ Culture and Risk” Pp138-167 ， In Zinn, Jens O.  （ed） Social
Theories of Risk and Uncertainty ： An Introduction ，Malden， Wiley-
BlackwellZerubavel, Eviatar. 1999. Social Mindscapes: An Invitation to Cognitive Sociology.
Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.Reed, Isaac Ariail. 2015, “Deep Culture in Action:
Resignification, Synecdoche, and Metanarrative in the Moral Panic of the Salem Witch Trials.
”Theory and Society 44: 65–94.Polletta, Francesca and Jessica Callahan. 2019. 'Deep Stories,
Nostalgia Narratives and Fake News: Storytelling in the Trump Era.” In Jason Mast and
Jeffrey Alexander(eds.),Politics of Meaning/Meaning of Politics: Cultual sociology in the
2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Berlin: Springer.Reed, Isaac Ariail,Power in Modernity:
Agency relations and the creative destruction of the King’s Two Bodies. Chicago: University
of Chicago Press. 2020.Hahl, Oliver, Minjae Kim and Ezra Zuckerman Sivan. 2018. “The
Authentic Appeal of the Lying Demagogue: Proclaiming the Deeper Truth about Political
Illegitimacy.” American Sociological Review 83(1): 1-33Mason, Liliana. 2018. Uncivil
Agreement: How Politics Became our Identity. Chicago: University of Chicago
Press.Brubaker, Rogers and Frederick Cooper. 2000. “Beyond 'Identity.’” Theory and
Society 29:1–47.Brubaker, Rogers, Mara Loveman, and Peter Stamatov. 2004. “Ethnicity as
Cognition.” Theory and Society 33(1):33-64.Abrams, Dominic and Michael Hogg. 2010.
“Social Identity and Self Categorization.” Pp. 179-93 In John Dovidio, Miles Hewstone, Peter
Glick and Victoria Esses (eds.) Sage Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and
Discrimination. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.Deaux, Kay and Daniela
Martin. 2003. “Interpersonal Networks and Social Categories: Specifying Levels of Context
in Identity Processes.” Social Psychology Quarterly 66(3): 101-17.Markus, Hazel Rose and
Shinobu Kitayama. 2010. “Cultures and Selves: A Cycle of Mutual
Constitution.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 5 （ 4 ） : 420-30.Iyengar, Shanto.
2012. “Affect, not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion
Quarterly 76(3): 405-31.Cerulo, Karen A. 2018. “Scents and Sensibility: Olfaction, Sense-
Making, and MeaningAttribution.” American Sociological Review 83(2): 361-389.Zelizer,
Viviana. 2011. Economic Lives: How Culture Shapes the Economy. Princeton University
Press.