Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assessment Checklist-CW-ISM (Subject To EE Approval) S1 - 2022-2023 - Tagged
Assessment Checklist-CW-ISM (Subject To EE Approval) S1 - 2022-2023 - Tagged
Assessment Checklist-CW-ISM (Subject To EE Approval) S1 - 2022-2023 - Tagged
15 days after
Submission Date: Friday 16 th December 2022 Feedback Target Date:
submission
Module Co-ordinator/
Dr Yehia Nawar Word count 5,000
Tutor:
Submission Instructions:
The Assessment checklist is designed to monitor your weekly progression during seminar classes in order to help you
complete the summative assessment task successfully.
You are advised to adopt the following structure for the report:
Title page: Include module title, the name of the selected Multinational discussed, student ID number and the
total word count (excluding bibliography)
Contents page
Introduction: this should include some background on Background on the selected company and the
market where they operate. The purpose of the report. You may wish to include details such as the type
Page 1 of 5
of business, size, how long it has been trading, etc. Students should also give a brief account here of the
research process (focusing primarily on the Secondary data collection).
Findings: here the results of the research need to be presented. this should include the research findings
related the addressed questions (a)What is the current strategic positioning of the selected company in
the market? (b) What is the current innovation strategy of the selected company? (c) what is the
company’s strategic situation? Students are also expected to consistently support their work with reference
to appropriate sources (cited in accordance with the Harvard referencing convention).
Recommendations: here students should present their proposals for the Two potential strategies that can be
pursued by your chosen organisation to ensure market share and growth. Based on the selected strategies,
recommend ONE of them. Justify how the recommended strategy is the best among the others. Discuss how
the selected strategy would be implemented using the CANVAS approach within a 3-year period from 2022-
2025 Work should be supported with reference to appropriate sources.
Conclusions: this should follow logically on from the findings and provide a concise summary of them. No
new information should be presented here.
References and Bibliography: you should be discerning about your sources of information and ensure that
all references conform to the Harvard convention.
https://libguides.lsbu.ac.uk/marketing/referencing
Submission
Friday 16th of December 2022
Assessment Criteria:
Each task is being marked according to the following rubric: -
Coherent argument,
Application of course concepts, and Discussion and analysis of key
Marking logical structure, overall
evidence of background reading and issues in the case, calculation
Scheme presentation of the
research (including literature review). and solutions
report, and referencing
% 40 50 10
Page 4 of 5
Demonstrates a good level of
Good knowledge and understanding of Well-structured arguments
argument with critical judgement in
small business challenges and issues. and design with reasonable
the analysis, evaluation, synthesis
Management process presented with the flow of the report.
and findings evaluated critically,
exploration and critique of Good range of background
Good B rigorously, and fully discussed in
information/ideas from a comprehensive reading with good
context with research. Good l
range of sources. Good literature review referencing consistently
research and good amount
in connection with references to textbook accurate to a recognised
information collected and analysed
and website material. standard.
in full
Fair understanding of small business Demonstrates a fair level of
challenges and issues. Management argument with critical judgement in
process presented with the exploration the analysis, evaluation, synthesis
and critique of information/ideas from a and findings evaluated critically, Fair structure, design and
Fair C
comprehensive range of sources. Fair rigorously, and fully discussed in reference.
literature review presented in connection context with research. Fair research
with references to textbook and website and fair amount information
material. collected and analysed in full
Demonstrates some level of
Some understanding of small business
argument with critical judgement in
challenges and issues. Management
the analysis, evaluation, synthesis
process presented with the exploration
and findings evaluated critically, Poor structure and design
and critique of information/ideas from a
Weak D rigorously, and fully discussed in with a reasonable flow of
comprehensive range of sources. Fair
context with research. Some ideas
literature review presented in connection
evidence of research and some
with references to textbook and website
information collected and analysed
material.
in full
E or Barely any investigation into the No reasoning and no ideas of their
Poor Lack of all the above
below background own
Page 5 of 5