Final Report

PREFACE
The assessment work on the KOICA Project Assisted School Building Structure in Sigi
Regency, Central Sulawesi Province was carried out with a view to verifying the level of
damage to the building after the September 28, 2018 Earthquake until the provision of DED
and Shop Drawing.
In accordance with the Terms of Reference the scope of this work has the scope of:
1. Make a detailed report of damage to the building to be repaired
2. Analyzing each damage and solution according to SNI
3. Adding building reinforcement according to SNI
4. The calculation results are in accordance with the test equipment used in the
assessment
5. Working Methods
6. Material Use
7. Detailed Engineering Design in the form of Shop Drawing and RAB details
8. Documentation at the time of assessment
The scope of the work scope above is intended to facilitate the implementation /
construction phase of the building rehabilitation, so that the right quality and timely targets
can be achieved. School buildings especially Elementary School/ Islamic Elementary School
must receive more attention in terms of safety and accessibility. This building is used by
children, so that if there is an event such as an earthquake, they can save themselves. Given
this area traversed by Palu-Koro Fault.
Thanks to Department of Education and Culture, Sigi Regency, Central Sulawesi

Province, and the Plan International Indonesia Foundation for their support and coordination
as well as to all parties involved in carrying out the assessment and making of the DED and
its analysis so that the data can be presented in this report.
Hopefully this report can meet the needs and can be useful for those who need it.
Palu, June 2020

Vendor
Ir. I Ketut Sulendra, ST., MT
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
COVER ........................................................................................................................... i
PREFACE ...................................................................................................................... ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................. iii
LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................... iv
LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................... v
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 1
1.1 Background .............................................................................................................. 1
1.2 Purpose, Objectives and Scope of Activities ......................................................... 2
1.3 Expected Outputs and Results................................................................................ 3
CHAPTER II LOCATION OF ACTIVITIES AND CONDITIONS
OF BUILDING....................................................................................4
2.1 Location of Activities ............................................................................................... 4
2.2 Condition of School Buildings ................................................................................ 5
CHAPTER III METHODOLOGY OF IMPLEMENTATION OF ACTIVITIES 8
3.1 Equipment and Materials ....................................................................................... 8
3.2 Procedure for Conducting Survey Activities ........................................................ 9
3.3 Analysis and Presentation of Results ..................................................................... 10
3.4 Methods of Strengthening and Repairing Buildings ............................................ 10
3.5 Time Schedule .......................................................................................................... 15
CHAPTER IV THE RESULTS OF BUILDING STRUCTURE INSPECTION ... 16
4.1 Verification Results and Building Damage Details .............................................. 16
4.2 Results and Analysis of Data from Building Damage .......................................... 17
4.3 Strengthening and Repairing Building Damage ................................................... 22
4.4 Calculation of The Real of Cost Estimation and Presentation of
Shop Drawing ........................................................................................................... 24
CHAPTER V CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................... 25
5.1 Conclusions............................................................................................................... 25
5.2 Recommendations .................................................................................................... 26
ATTACHMENT
1. Technical Verification
2. Hammer Test Results
3. Real of Cost Estimation
4. Shop Drawing
iii
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1. Types of structural damage and handling methods ........................................ 10

Table 3.2. Time Schedule ................................................................................................ 15
Table 4.1. Recapitulation of verification and handling of building damage ................... 16
Table 4.2. Recapitulation of Hammer Test results .......................................................... 21
Table 4.3. Recapitulation of the real of cost estimation for each building unit ............... 16
iv
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2.1 Map of infrastructure in Sigi Regency ............................................................ 4

Figure 2.2 The location of the farthest school surveyed
(Pakuli Islamic Elementary School) ............................................................... 5
Figure 2.3 Sidondo Elementary School: Roof (left), Floor (center), Ceilings (right) ...... 6
Figure 2.4 Pakuli Islamic Elementary School: Wood column (left), Cast concrete
on floor rebates (center) dan Masonry walls (right) ....................................... 6
Figure 2.5 Inpres Lambara Elementary School: Cracks in column (left), Weathered
Frame (middle), Cracks in wall (right) ........................................................... 7
Figure 2.6 Inpres 1 Kaluku Tinggu Elementary School: Cracks in the corner wall
(left), Column (middle), Frame (right) ........................................................... 7
Figure 2.7 Inpres 1 Pandere Elementary School: Cracks on the top wall of the
frame (left), Bottom frame (middle), Angel (right) ........................................ 7
Figure 4.1 Damage to the foundation that needs to be grouted ........................................ 18
Figure 4.2 Damage to the column that needs to be strengthened with reinforcement
and new concrete ............................................................................................ 18
Figure 4.3 Chipped wall cracks & the addition of chicken mess / reinforcing clips ........ 19
Figure 4.4 Ceiling damage................................................................................................ 20
Figure 4.5 Damage to floors that need to be dismantled and coated with tiles ................ 20
Figure 4.6 The ampig wall that collapsed and tilted......................................................... 21
Figure 4.7 Damage to list plank, door frames, window frame, and ventilation. .............. 22
Figure 4.8 Room partitions that need repair ..................................................................... 22
Figure 4.9 Strengthen the wall with the reinforcement clip method (left),
Strengthen walls and columns with chicken mess (right) .............................. 23
Figure 4.10 Repairing cracks in wall joins and practical columns by adding
reinforcement .................................................................................................. 24
Figure 4.11 Repair of practical column cracks and roof beam with grouting .......................... 24
Figure 4.12 Method of strengthening the walls that are cracked lengthwise with chicken mess 24
v
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
After the Palu quake on September 28, 2018 many simple buildings (non-engineered
structure) and engineered structure that were damaged even collapsed after the
earthquake. After more than a year of the earthquake disaster, there are still many
damaged buildings that have not been repaired, one of the causes is the limited funds
from the government, the private sector, and non-governmental funds.
In Sigi Regency, based on records from the National Disaster Relief Agency and
Word Bank after the earthquake damaged school buildings in this region reached 200
schools. This happened because Sigi Regency was the worst affected area after the
earthquake, including the 5 (five) schools that were targeted for assessment in this work.
Based on reports from Word Bank and several other parties, the damage that occurred
in this building structure due to major design errors that led to damage to buildings -
masonry buildings are: the existence of flexible diaphragms, improper detailing at the
meeting between walls, and between walls and practical columns, absence of fastening
beams, and openings that are too large. Likewise, building construction using local
materials, with inadequate workmanship based on traditional rules is another reason for
the failure of masonry buildings.
Based on several after earthquake surveys, it appears that most public buildings such
as hospitals and schools do not fully meet the standards that need to be applied.
Deficiency is always found, both in terms of material quality, structural details,
workmanship, as well as a combination of these factors, which shows minimal (or no)
technical support, such as engineers, technicians, and governments who have authority
in their fields, at the time design and construction period.
Analysis of the damage arising in the components / elements of the building is done
by analyzing the damage that occurs and its causes. Damage to buildings can occur when
the needs of users increase, and damage that occurs can be allowed to a certain extent,
but before the building reaches the useful life, then the level of initial damage must
immediately get attention, if the building is a function of public service. If there is an
1
initial damage and does not get immediate attention and initial repair, it will cause
difficulties in subsequent handling.
Building is an asset that must always be protected against various things that can
affect the building. Safety control is also absolutely necessary especially with the
Building Law (UUBG) which requires aspects of building safety and reliability. The
building is a physical form of the results of construction work that is integrated with the
place of domicile, partly or wholly located on and or in the ground or in water which
functions as a place for humans to carry out activities.
Based on Law No. 28 of 2002 concerning Buildings in Article 3 states that to realize
buildings that are functional and in accordance with building codes that are harmonious
and in harmony with their environment, must ensure the reliability of buildings in terms
of safety, health, comfort, and convenience. Then emphasized again in PP No. 36 of 2005
concerning Regulations for the Implementation of Law No. 28 of 2002 concerning
Buildings, Article 16 paragraph (1) states that the reliability of buildings is the condition
of buildings that meet the requirements for safety, health, comfort, and convenience of
buildings in accordance with the requirements of established functions.
The results of the assessment of this school building can produce technical
verification in the form of the level of damage to the building, reporting damage to each
element of the school building and handling the damage. Then make a method of
strengthening and repairing accompanied by financing analysis and making a shop
drawing as a reference in the implementation / construction when physical work is done.
1.2 Purpose, Objectives and Scope of Activities

Assessment of the structure of a school building after an earthquake is carried out
with the intent and purpose of obtaining a picture of damage:
1. Verification the level of damage outdoor and indoor.
2. The condition of the building elements examined include: condition of the
building subgrade, slope of the building, percent damage to the main structure
(foundation, tie beam, column, roof beam, wall and roof) as well as non-structural
elements which include: window door sills, ceiling and stairs and electrical
installations and water lines.
2
3. Knowing the compressive strength of concrete with non-destructive tools using
the Hammer Test method.
The scope of the school building assessment activities includes:

1. Make a detailed report of damage to the building to be repaired
2. Analyzing each damage and solution according to SNI
3. Adding building reinforcement according to SNI
4. The calculation results are in accordance with the test equipment used in the
assessment
5. Working Methods
6. Material Use
7. Detailed Engineering Design in the form of Shop Drawing and RAB details
8. Documentation at the time of assessment
The number of school building objects to be assessed is 5 (five) schools, namely:

Sidondo Elementary School, Pakuli Islamic Elementary School, Inpres Lambara
Elementary School, Inpres 1 Kaluku Tinggu Elementary School and Inpres 1 Pandere
Elementary School.
1.3 Expected Outputs and Results

The output of this activity is in the form of DED (Detail Engineering Design) of each
school building unit including in the form of verification of damage and technical
verification, damage conditions and recommendations for handling damage according to
the latest applicable SNI standards, Real of Cost Estimation, Shop Drawing, Hammer
Test results of concrete quality and photographs documentation of field survey activities.
3
CHAPTER II
LOCATION OF ACTIVITIES AND CONDITIONS OF BUILDING
2.1 Location of Activities

The location of activities is in Sigi Regency, namely in Pandere and Pakuli Villages,
Gumbasa District, Lambara Village in Tanambulava District, Sidondo Village, Sigi
Biromaru District and Kaluku Tinggu Village, West Dolo District.
Figure 2.1. Map of infrastructure in Sigi Regency
There are 4 (four) schools on the Poros Palu - Kulawi street, is Sidondo Elementary
School (29 km from Palu City), Inpres Lambara Elementary School (37.4 km from Palu
City), Inpres 1 Pandere Elementary School (44.3 km from Palu City) , and Pakuli Islamic
Elementary School (46 km from Palu City), while Inpres 1 Kaluku Tinggu Elementary
School is on the Poros Palu - Bangga street (25.5 km from Palu City).
4
Figure 2.2. The location of the farthest school surveyed
(Pakuli Islamic Elementary School)
2.2 Condition of School Buildings

The school buildings surveyed are in the form of non-engineered structures, in general
the walls of the building are made of masonry (bricks and concrete blocks), the condition
of the walls generally experiences cracks in the corners of door and window frames, as
well as in the confluence of wall areas and on a column made of wood. The frame system
is a tie beam (sloof), a practical column and reinforced concrete roof beam without any
latei beams on the sill. Some of them still use wooden columns (Inpres 1 Kaluku Tinggu
Elementary School and Pakuli Islamic Elementary School Building 2. Foundations in
masonry) some foundations have small cracks, namely Inpres 1 Kaluku Tinggu
Elementary and Inpres 1 Pandere Elementary School, most of the floors are concrete
rebates with cement slabs on the surface, even then, has been peeled off (spalling), only
Inpres 1 Pandere Elementary School and Inpres 1 Kaluku Tinggu Elementary are already
in tile. Inpres 1 Pandere Elementary School Building 2, door and window frames as well
as door, window and ventilation have been worn out, so it is in dire need of a complete
replacement. Pakuli Islamic Elementary School Building 2. Ceiling conditions in almost
5
all buildings require the replacement of the cover because the condition is rotten. Overall,
the building requires painting on walls, ceilings, frame and roof coverings. Some building
conditions such as in the following photos:
Figure 2.3. Sidondo Elementary School: Roof (left), Floor (center), Ceilings (right)
Figure 2.4. Pakuli Islamic Elementary School: Wood column (left), Cast concrete on floor
rebates (center) dan Masonry walls (right)
6
Figure 2.5. Inpres Lambara Elementary School: Cracks in column (left), Weathered frame
(middle), Cracks in wall (right)
Figure 2.6. Inpres 1 Kaluku Tinggu Elementary School: Cracks in the corner wall (left),
Column (middle), Frame (right)
Figure 2.7. Inpres 1 Pandere Elementary School: Cracks on the top wall of the frame (left),
Bottom frame (middle), Angel (right)
7
CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY OF IMPLEMENTATION OF ACTIVITIES
3.1 Equipment and Materials

Equipment used in carrying out field survey activities includes:
1. Tape Measure (50 m and 7 m)
2. Waterpass and Plumb
3. Hammer Test Apparatus
4. Hammer
5. Digital Camera or Handphone
6. Personal Protective Equipment (Safety Helmet, Safety Gloves, Shoes, Glasses
and Safety Vest)
The meter is used to measure the floor area of a building, the area of walls, ceilings,
doors and windows. Plumb and waterpass are used to measure the slope of walls and
floors of buildings. Hammer Test is used to retrieve the compressive strength of concrete
elements in sloof and building columns. Hammer is used to peel the surface of beams and
columns to be retrieved data with a Hammer Test tool. A digital camera or cellphone is
used to take building documentation as well as building elements and activities during
the field survey. PPE is used as personal protection from possible fall in building
materials during field surveys.
While the materials used include:

1. Office Stationery
2. Hammer Test Form
3. Printers (A4 and A3)
4. Self-Estimated Price for Sigi Regency in 2020
Office Stationery is used when taking primary data in the field including sketching
building plans and zoning locations of damage to each building element. The form is used
when collecting concrete compressive strength of building elements. Printer to print
narration of activity reports, Real of Cost Estimation and shop drawing. Self-Estimated
Price for Sigi Regency in 2020 was used to prepare the Real of Cost Estimation.
8
3.2 Procedure for Conducting Survey Activities
Procedure for conducting survey activities through the following stages:
1. Coordination of the Vendor Team with Plan International Indonesia Foundation
parties and the school.
2. Survey Preparation
3. Field Survey Implementation
4. Verification of Field Survey Results
Before conducting the field survey, coordination was held between the Vendor Team,
Plan International Indonesia Foundation parties and the schools, so that the activities
could be carried out properly.
Based on the coordination of May 15, 2020, it was agreed that a field survey would
be carried out on May 16, 2020. Plan International Indonesia Foundation parties had
previously coordinated with the schools to accept and assist the Vendor team during the
field survey. The preparation of the field survey is carried out by the Vendor team in
coordination among surveyor team members and prepare equipment and materials that
will be needed, including preparing transportation facilities, and accommodation to be
used.
The field survey was carried out according to the agreement on Saturday May 16,
2020. The first school ready to receive the surveyor team was Sidondo Elementary
School, in Sidondo 1 Village, Sigi Biromaru District (29 km south of Palu City). This
school building consists of 2 (two) building units, but only 1 (one) building unit surveyed,
because the other units have been rehabilitated. The procedure for conducting each
school survey is as follows:
1. Visually look around the building, check if there are indications of land
subsidence and foundation.
2. Measuring the building area, building height and other building elements.
3. Inspect and measure damage to building structure components (foundations, tie
beams, practical columns, roof beams, roof trusses and building walls), and non-
structural components of buildings (floors, ceiling, door frames and doors,
windows and vents, steps and cover roof)
4. Documenting and zoning any damage from the building elements.
9
5. Test the compressive strength of building structural elements (tie beams, practical
columns and roof beams) with the Hammer Test.
6. Verifying the results of the primary data of concrete compressive strength testing
with a Hammer Test to the school authorities.
7. Briefly evaluate the data from the field survey data at that location, to maintain if
any data has been missed that has not been retrieved.
3.3 Analysis and Presentation of Results

Primary data obtained in the field are analyzed and presented in the form of narratives,
tables and figures to make it more communicative. Especially when implementing the
rehabilitation work in order to guarantee quality and time targets can be achieved.
Damage verification and technical verification are carried out in accordance with PU
Ministerial Regulation No.16 / PRT / M / 2010. The verification form is presented in the
excel form, the verification results will show light, moderate, or heavy damage,
depending on the amount of the percentage of damage to each building element.
Presentation of survey results and analysis results are given in the form of a short
report, in the form of verification results, methods / stages of strengthening and
improvement of structural and non-structural elements of buildings and materials and
equipment used during construction work. Sketch drawings of examples of reinforcement
and repairs are also presented in reports to complete shop drawing and real of cost
estimation.
3.4 Methods of Strengthening and Repairing Buildings

Some methods of strengthening and repairing that are commonly done in post-
earthquake work on buildings are as follows:
Table 3.1. Types of structural damage and handling methods

No Damage type Characteristic Handling
Small crack and Peel the cracked plaster off
peeling on the outside and then replace it with a
1 Light damage of the concrete which new plaster, then wall filler
may be accompanied by and then painted new.
cracks of plastering
2 Moderate damage enough structural a. Grouting cement paste
cracks visible, but the from the top side for plate
10
reinforcement does not and beam elements and
melt and the side sides for column
deformation / deflection elements.
does not exceed when b. Replacement of a concrete
the yield conditions covers by grouting can be
done because the repaired
layer is relatively thin.
3 Heavy damage The cracks are wide a. Structural strengthening,
enough or which can be done on
structural elements floor plates, beams or
have undergone major columns. For this type of
deformation which is damaged the concrete
characterized by severe covers is peeled until the
spalling and yield main reinforcement is
reinforcement. visible and then
reinforced in the form of
an additional longitudinal
reinforcement along with
the brace, then installing
formwork and casting
concrete. The aggregates
used for concrete stacking
materials are sand and
gravel which have good
quality with a maximum
gravel diameter of 10 mm.
The mixture must be
added with a
superplastizer and stirred
with molen concrete so as
to produce a compressive
strength of at least 20
MPa.
b. Demolition of structural
elements, done by
dismantling the concrete
while the reinforcement is
still fully usable.
Demolition of concrete
must be done in ways that
do not cause too much
vibration to other parts of
the structure. Demolition
of concrete using a
vibrating machine is not
11
recommended, but the use
of hammers and betel can
be tolerated.
After all the concrete has
been dismantled, the
reinforcement is tidied up
again, installing formwork
and continued with cast
concrete. Aggregates used
are sand and gravel which
have good quality. The
mixture must be added
with a superplasticizer and
stirred with a concrete
mixer so that it can produce
a compressive strength of a
minimum 20 MPa.
In simple buildings (non-engineered structures), the elements that are generally

damaged after the earthquake are:
1. Cracks on the stone foundation (masonry)
2. Cracks in structural elements such as tie beams, practical columns and roof
beams.
3. Cracks on the wall (wall angles, top and bottom frame, inter-wall fields, wooden
column paths, practical column and walls).
4. Cracks on the floor.
5. Damage to the ceiling cover
6. The ampig wall that collapsed
7. Roof frame including List Plank
Handling from the damage, generally carried out reinforcement and repair as follows:
1. The cracks on the foundation are chipped with mortars, then the cracks are filled
with cement paste until they are fully covered, then the plaster is chipped again.
2. Cracks on structural elements, if cracks are cracked hair, injected with cement
paste, if it is wide enough to be casted with cement paste, and if the reinforcement
is corrosion, flexing it is possible to be chipped with a cracked concrete layer plus
reinforcement, then casted again.
12
3. Hair cracks on the wall are handled with coating and wall filler, cracks are wide
enough, crack lines are chipped, then add chicken mess and reinforcement clips
and plastered again.
4. Cracks on the floor are handled by chipping concrete floor rebates, including
coating and layer of old tile if any, then cast new rebates and then installed a new
tile layer.
5. Ceiling cover that is experiencing deflection down, replaced with a new ceiling
cover, by first strengthening the ceiling frame.
6. In the damage / collapse of the ampig wall, it is handled by replacing the ampig
wall with a kalsiboard material that is relatively lighter and weather resistant. If
possible, the shape of the hood frame from the saddle shape is changed to the
shape of the pyramid so that the end of the roof support is no longer needed.
7. Roof truss, including list plank that is damaged in the form of excess deflection,
handled by opening the roof covering then strengthening or replacing the
damaged roof truss elements with new ones, then the roof cover is paired with a
new cover.
After knowing the types and causes of damage that have been briefly described above
and the building can be repaired / strengthened, the next step is the selection of repair
methods after an earthquake for each structural element. In this election also related to
the selection of materials in order to obtain the results of improvements whose strength
is in accordance with the desired and durable. In general, the material requirements for
repairs are:
1. Small shrinkage
2. Can be attached properly
3. Expansion and modulus of elasticity is not far from the material being repaired
4. Low permeability
5. Durable.
Some repair methods that can be used to handle post-earthquake buildings include:
1. Coating: Coating the concrete surface by applying or spraying plastic and liquid
materials. This layer is used to cover the concrete against the environment that
13
damages concrete. The easiest and cheapest way is to give a paste of cement paste
on the concrete surface, but this material is not plastic.
2. Injection (grout) is used to repair elements or cracked elements. Injection
materials, such as dilute epoxy resins are inserted in cracks / cracks by pumping
(applying pressure). Previously made holes with a certain distance as the entrance
of injection material in the cracked part. Then the other cracked parts are given a
cap (plastered) to avoid any leakage. After that the material is injected with
pressure, into the gap / crack until it appears in other holes that have been filled
or flowed out. This method can be used to fill small, deep cracks where cavities
are not desired.
3. Shotcrete: This method is done by firing mortar or concrete (usually with a small
aggregate size) on the concrete surface that is repaired. Shotcrete can be used to
repair vertical or horizontal surfaces (from below).
4. Prepacked Concrete: This method is done if the concrete damage is severe, for
example, large and large cracks and compressive strength of concrete decreases.
First the peeling concrete in this section is cleaned and filled with new concrete.
The new concrete is made by filling the empty space with aggregate fully. Then
injected with a shrinkage mortar that is small and has a good bond with the old
concrete. In the vertical area or bottom surface, this work needs to be assisted with
formwork.
5. Jacketing: Material in the form of a veil that can protect concrete against damage.
This sheathing material can be in the form of metal / steel, rubber, concrete,
composite. This method is commonly used to repair / strengthen columns.
6. Adding reinforcement: Used to strengthen structural elements (beams, plates or
columns) that have been damaged badly enough to function again to carry the
burden. Strengthening of the beam is carried out if the beam is softened and based
on the analysis of the remaining strength no longer bears the burden.
Strengthening of the beam is carried out if the beam is softened and based on
analysis the remaining strength is no longer able to carry the burden of the plan.
The additional reinforcement can be either a longitudinal or vertical
reinforcement (steel or steel plate). As an additional longitudinal reinforcement,
14
carbon fiber strips can also be used by intermediating the adhesive on the concrete
surface or by prestressed cables by means of external prestressing. The final
method is done if the crack is wide enough and many and does not allow the beam
to be dismantled. In this way the prestressed cable is placed under or next to the
beam by providing a certain tensile force that causes deflection to the top and
finally cracks in the beam can be closed again. Adding reinforcement to the plates
by stripping the concrete cover, additional reinforcement is installed, covered
with new concrete, for example with shotcrete. Adding reinforcement to the
column can be done simultaneously with the jacketing method above. To note in
the column is that additional reinforcement must be anchored to the foundation,
beam or plate.
3.5 Time Schedule

In accordance with the agreement signed between the Plan International Indonesia
Foundation parties and the Vendor on April 28, 2020, the Vendor gave 30 calendar days
to complete all stages of the assessment and preparation of the DED from KOICA's
Assistance work. Since the Covid-19 epidemic hit the whole world as well as other non-
technical issues, so that the new field survey activities can be carried out on May 16,
2020. Due to this, Vendors make rescheduling of activities as in Table 3.2 below:
Table 3.2. Time Schedule

No Description of Activities Activities Time Estimates Note
1 Survey preparation Friday, May 15, 2020
2 Survey implementation Saturday, May 16, 2020
3 Data processing Monday, May 18, 2020 Primary data
4 Analysis and Monday, June 1, 2020 Real of Cost Estimation
Calculation and Shop Drawing
5 Reporting Results Thursday, June 11, 2020 Print and Submit
15
CHAPTER IV
THE RESULTS OF BUILDING STRUCTURE INSPECTION
4.1 Verification Results and Building Damage Details

The results of the inspection in the form of damage verification, technical verification
and handling methods are as follows:
Table 4.1. Recapitulation of verification and handling of building damage
No Buildings Name Damage Handling of Building Note

Verification Damage
1 Sidondo Light damage Replace ampig walls, The ampig
Elementary School floors, ceilings, wall is
chipping walls and collapsed
changing partitions
between rooms
2.a Pakuli Islamic Light - Replacing floors, The
Elementary School, Moderate ceilings, chipping walls, concrete
Building 1 damage reinforcing concrete column is
columns with chicken cracked
mess, toilet repairs
2.b Pakuli Islamic Light - Replacing floors, Some part
Elementary School, Moderate ceilings, chipping walls, of the roof
Building 2 damage reinforcing wooden is leaking
columns and concrete
columns with chicken
mess, replacing doors,
patching roof coverings,
adding KM / WC
3.a Lambara 1 Light - Replacing the ceiling, The
Elementary School, Moderate chipping walls, floors, concrete
Building 1 damage reinforcing concrete column is
columns with chicken cracked
mess, plastering on the
terrace wall
3.b Lambara 1 Light - Replacing floors, Additional
Elementary School, Moderate ceilings, frame, door, latei beam
Building 2 damage ventilation, windows,
chipping walls,
reinforcing concrete
16
No Buildings Name Damage Handling of Building Note
Verification Damage
mess, plastering on the
terrace wall, inter-room
partitions.
4 Inpres Kaluku Light damage Chipping walls and Just a wall
Tinggu Elementari adding chicken mess, crack
School changing partitions
between rooms,
foundation chipping and
injection of cement
paste, changing door
locks
5.a Inpres 1 Pandere Light damage Replacing the terrace Repair
Elementary School, ceiling, chipping walls, stairs for
Building 2 reinforcing concrete each class
mess, replacing
partitions between
rooms, plastering on the
terrace walls,
foundation chipping and
injection of cement
paste, chicken mess
outside walls.
5.b Inpres 1 Pandere Light damage Replacing the terrace The outer
Elementary School, ceiling, chipping walls, wall is
Building 2 foundation chipping and porous
injection of cement
paste.
4.2 Results and Analysis of Data from Building Damage

The results of damage in general are summarized in Table 4.1. above, analysis of
damage data is described as follows:
1. Cracks on continuous footing (masonry)
Cracks on a continuous foundation to tie beams and walls are structural cracks, if
the cracks are not wide, it is possible to chipping the mortar mixture and grouting
17
with cement paste. Grouting stuffing must fill to full cracks / cracks. For
horizontal cracks, repairs are made in the same way.
Figure 4.1. Damage to the foundation that needs to be grouted
2. Cracks in structural elements such as tie beams, practical columns and roof beams.
Cracks in practical columns and structural columns need to be strengthened by the
following methods:
a. Peel the plastering and observe whether the cracks are translucent around the
column, if not translucent, enough to be grouted with cement paste.
b. If the piercing or reinforcement is corroded and bent/ break up, then chipping
deeper until you see the shear reinforcement.
c. Add longitudinal reinforcement and shear reinforcement, then cast with a new
concrete layer.
Figure 4.2. Damage to the column that needs to be strengthened with reinforcement and
new concrete
3. Cracks on the wall (angles, top and bottom of the frame, the plane between the
walls, the path of the wooden column, the boundary of the parked column and the
18
wall). This type of damage is the most common occurrence after-earthquake in
buildings. Wall as a partition, with a small shear stress is very susceptible to
damage during an earthquake. This will be worse if the bottom and top of the door
and window frames have no latei beams.
Figure 4.3. Chipped wall cracks & the addition of chicken mess / reinforcing clips.
If the wall crack is wide enough and translucent to the surface of the wall next
to it, then it needs to be chipped as wide as 30 cm and added a chicken mess or
reinforcement clip diameter of 8 mm with a distance of 30 cm and plastered again.
4. Handling damage to the ceiling is

In general, almost all buildings in this work require ceiling repair, especially the
ceiling covering. Only a few buildings with good ceilings. Namely Inpres Pandere
Elementary School, building 2 and Inpres 1 Kaluku Tinggu Elementary School.
The method of repairing ceiling damage is as follows:
a. Disassemble the decayed and exposed ceiling cover
b. A declining ceiling frame is strengthened or replaced if it has rotted.
c. Cover again with a new ceiling coating, then painted.
19
Figure 4.4. Ceiling damage
5. Cracks on the floor

Common damage that occurs on the floor is peeling of the surface of the floor, the
existence of holes and cracks extending on other surfaces. The method of handling
such damage is to dismantle the concrete floor rebate layer, compact the layer and
re-cast with a new rebate and a layer of tiles installed as the cover.
Figure 4.5. Damage to floors that need to be dismantled and coated with tiles
6. The ampig walls that collapse or tilt, need to be replaced with materials that are
sweaty, durable and weather resistant (rain and sunlight), materials such as
calsiboard, can be used. If possible, the shape of the roof is modified to form a
prism which was originally a form of pyramid (saddle). This happened at Sidondo
Elementary School.
20
The method for changing the masonry hood support into the calsiboard cover is as
follows:
a. unload remaining stone pairs, or tilted stone pairs.
b. install the supporting frame / holder for the place to install the calsiboard.
c. install replacement cover stone masks with calsiboard or similar material.
d. The last work is finishing in the form of painting
Figure 4.6. The ampig wall that collapsed and tilted
7. Roof frame including list plank.

In general, the roof truss is still in good condition, except for the roof truss at
Pakuli Islamic Elementary School, building 2, needs to be strengthened / replaced.
The list plank pair also generally needs to be replaced, or repainted. The methods
for repairing hood frames and plank lists are as follows:
a. Check the roof truss, through the ceiling hole.
b. If there is damage in the form of deflection, if possible reinforced again. If it
is weathered it needs to be replaced.
c. Change the hood, by opening the hood gradually.
d. If there is a rotten roof cover, it needs to be replaced.
e. This applies to plank list pairs, if there is something rotten, it needs to be
replaced with a plank list from calsiboard material.
f. The last work is painting.
21
Figure 4.7. Damage to list plank, door frames, window frame, and ventilation
8. Partition between rooms

Partitions between rooms (Sidondo Elementary School, Inpres 1 Kaluku Tinggu
Elementary School, Inpres Lambara Elementary School (Building 1) and Inpres
Pandere Elementary School (Building 1), require replacement. The method of
repairing inter-room partitions is as follows:
a. Dismantling old partitions made of rotten wooden boards
b. Strengthen the wall above the partition with the latei beam, as well as the
supporting column of the latei beam.
c. Installing a new pastor that is lighter and stronger, can use multiplex or similar
materials
d. Finishing by painting.
Figure 4.8. Room partitions that need repair
22
Hammer Test results are presented in the following table:
Table 4.2 Recapitulation of Hammer Test results
Compressive MPa Concrete
No Building Name 2
Strength (kg/cm ) equivalent Quality
1 Sidondo Elementary School 289 24 Medium
Pakuli Islamic Elementary
2.a 322 27 Medium
School, Building 1
Pakuli Islamic Elementary
2.b 275 23 Medium
School, Building 2
Inpres Lambara Elementary
3.a 404 34 Good
School, Building 1
Inpres Lambara Elementary
3.b 353 29 Medium
School, Building 2
Inpres 1 Kaluku Tinggu
4 264 22 Medium
Elementary School
Inpres Pandere Elementary
5.a 234 19 Low
School, Building 1
Inpres Pandere Elementary
5.b 301 25 Medium
School, Building 2
From Table 4.2 the compressive strength results are obtained on average quality,
except in the Inpres Lambara Elementary School building 1 obtained good quality and
the Inpres Pandere Elementary School building 1 with low quality.
4.3 Strengthening and Repairing Building Damage

The method of strengthening and repairing some building elements is given a sample
photo and a sketch of the picture as follows
Figure 4.9. Strengthen the wall with the reinforcement clip method (left), Strengthen walls
and columns with chicken mess (right)
23
Figure 4.10 Repairing cracks in wall joins and practical columns by adding
reinforcement
Figure 4.11 Repair of practical column cracks and roof beam with
grouting
Figure 4.12 Method of strengthening the walls that

are cracked lengthwise with chicken mess
24
4.4 Calculation of The Real of Cost Estimation and Presentation of Shop Drawing
The calculation of the real of cost estimation is based on data backups of each work
item obtained from the results of damage verification and technical verification of each
building. From the damage analysis of each building unit, the volume per work item is
obtained. The unit price of each job is based on the HPS (Self Estimated Price) material
prices and labor costs applicable in Sigi Regency in the 3rd quarter (July-September
2010). After the volume of each work item and unit price is obtained, then the total Real
of Cost Estimation building is known. Based on the level of damage, the area of the
building unit, as well as the handling of the damage, the estimated amount of the real of
cost estimation for each building unit can be estimated as follows:
Table 4.3 Recapitulation of the real of cost estimation for each building unit
No Building Name Cost Estimation (Rp) Note
1 Sidondo Elementary School 114.430.000,00
Pakuli Islamic Elementary School, 188.350.000,00
2.a
Building 1
Pakuli Islamic Elementary School, 309.797.000,00
2.b
Building 2
Inpres Lambara Elementary 135.714.000,00
3.a
School, Building 1
Inpres Lambara Elementary 164.185.000,00
3.b
School, Building 2
Inpres 1 Kaluku Tinggu 67.534.000,00
4
Elementary School
Inpres Pandere Elementary 70.379.000,00
5.a
School, Building 1
Inpres Pandere Elementary 48.677.000,00
5.b
School, Building 2
Total (A) 1.099.066.000,00
Budget (B) 1.100.000.000,00
Balance (B – A) 12.934.000,00
Presentation of shop drawings includes drawings of damage zoning, drawings on

zoning of damage management, sketches of reinforcement and repair methods and
drawings of construction implementation of each school building unit. All images are
presented in the appendix to this report.
25
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Conclusions
The conclusions that can be presented in this report are:
1. Damage categories based on damage verification and technical verification
revolve around light - moderate damage.
2. Damages that are common in simple buildings (non-engineered structures) after
an earthquake are:
a. Structural element damage in the form of cracks in stone foundations, cracks
and spalling on tie beams, practical columns and roof beams.
b. Other structural damage is the sloping and collapse of the ampig wall at the
ends of the building because the pair of walls is not bound by reinforced
concrete beams.
c. Hair cracks until crushing on the wall both on the corners of the frame, under
and above the frame and in the inter-wall plane are caused by the absence of
latei beams above and below the frame and there is no anchor in the practical
column to the wall.
d. In non-structural elements the damage includes: deflection on the ceiling
cover, cracks on the floor and accompanied by peeling (crushing), deflection
on the roof and list plank frame and weathered sills, doors, windows and
ventilation.
3. Concrete compressive strength test results using the Hammer Test on structural
elements from 5 (five schools) with a total of 8 (eight) building units, resulting in
a compressive strength of concrete ranging from 19 to 34 MPa (average quality).
4. Handling of damage in accordance with the level and type of damage.
5. Strengthening and repair methods provided in the form of:
a. Grouting on foundation elements and practical columns that experience large
cracks.
b. Repairing cracks in the wall is done with reinforcement clips and chipping
and adding chicken mess and then plastered again.
c. Hair cracks in walls and columns are repaired with coating and putty layers.
26
d. The layers of the floor and ceiling that are sagging and cracked are replaced
with a new layer.
e. Door frames, window sills, and weathered vents were replaced and latei
beams were added below and above the sills
f. The ceiling frame, the roof truss and the deflated list plank are strengthened
again, if not possible, replaced with new ones and are lighter and weather
resistant.
g. The Ampig walls at the edges of buildings that are sloping and collapsed are
replaced with lighter and weather-resistant materials such as calsibord.
h. The partition divider between damaged and weathered rooms is replaced with
lighter and easily knocked down materials, such as calsiboard or multiplex.
6. The total cost in the Real of Cost Estimation is around Rp. 1.2 billion for 5 (five)
schools with the number of building units of 8 (eight) units.
5.2 Recommendations
Recommendations that can be given to the results of the DED and the construction
process of the building rehabilitation work are:
1. The amount of funds can be added bearing in mind the greater need to obtain a
building that is suitable for use with consideration of safety and beauty.
Considering there are 8 (eight) building units from 5 (five) different schools.
2. Construction workers who handle this rehabilitation should be local personnel
around the school location, and each building unit is given responsibility to
different personalities, even though they are in one school environment. Given
the short time in implementation.
3. Still need to coordinate with the Vendors in the construction process, if there are
things that are unclear in the picture and the Real of Cost Estimation can be
communicated and find a solution.
27
BUILDING DAMAGE INSPECTION (Summarized from Ministerial Regulation 16 / PRT / M / 2010)
BUILDING NAME INSPECTION DATE LEVEL OF DAMAGE
SIDONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL May 16th, 2020 LIGHTLY DAMAGED
Poros Palu-Kulawi Street, Sidondo 1 Village

1 ADDRESS Sidondo Village, Sigi Biromaru District, Sigi Regency, Central Sulawesi
Province
2 COORDINATE 1,0955 S ; 119,9070 E
3 BUILDING OWNER Department of Education and Culture, Sigi Regency
4 BUILDING FUNCTION Classroom
5 TYPES OF STRUCTURES Beton Bertulang dan Dinding Pasangan (Masonry Wall and Bond Concrete)
6 NUMBER OF STORIES 1 (one)
7 ESTIMATION OF FLOOR AREA 144 m2
LEVEL OF DAMAGE LIGHT MODERATE HEAVY NOTE

DAMAGE TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE
I
BUILDING
1 Deflation in building floor v <0.2 m 0.2 -1.00 m >1 m
2 Slope of the building v <1◦ 1-2 ◦ >2◦
3 Number of damaged columns v <10 % 10-20% >20%
4 Number of damaged walls v <10% 10 -20% >20%
5 Number of damaged beams v <10% 10 -20% >20%
6 Number of damaged roofs v <10 % 10 -20% >20 %
7 Falling wall / window v <1% 1 -10 % >10 %
8 Damage to stairs / other buildings v <1 % 1 -10% >10 %
II DAMAGE TO PARTS IN BUILDING
1 Number of damaged columns v <10% 10-20 % >20%
2 Number of damaged walls v <10% v 10-20 % >20%
3 Number of damaged beams v <10% 10-20 % >20%
4 Number of damaged ceilings <10% 10-20 % v >20%
The number of falling partitions, lamps and
5 v <10% 10-20 % >20%
stairs
Number of installations, water conduit,
6 v <10% 10-20 % >20%
sewers
III NOTES AND RECOMMENDATIONS DOCUMENTATION OF DAMAGE

1 Dismantling and replacement of ampig walls
2 Replacement of Rebate Floors
with Ceramic Flooring
3 Repair of partition walls / barriers between
classes and strengthening the partition frame
4 Ceiling replacement
5 Repair of plastering on terrace columns
6 Repair of cracked walls in the frame area
with wiremesh
7 Repair of electrical installations
8 Painting walls, columns, frame, ceilings
and roof coverings
9 Listplank replacement
1. SDN SIDONDO _ Technical Verification Page 1 of 2

SIDONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL May 16th, 2020 LIGHTLY DAMAGED
IV TECHNICAL VERIFICATION
1 NEEDS OF BUILDING
Temporary classroom 1 Unit
Toilet 1 Unit
The new classroom - Unit
Area 144 m2
The new reconstruction - Unit
Availability of land for temporary buildings v YES NO
AREA 180 m2
2 AFFECTED INFRASTRUCTURE DATA

Total Students 100
Number of Buildings 1
Number of Stories 1
Total Room 2
ASSESSMENT OFFICER POSITION SIGNATURE

1 Ir. I Ketut Sulendra, ST, MT Team Leader
2 Yudi K. M, ST Member
3 Ellyni Dwi Fortuna, ST Member
4 Adhitya Hardika Anggara, ST Member
1. SDN SIDONDO _ Technical Verification Page 2 of 2

SURVEY, IDENTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION (SID), AFTER DISASTER SEPTEMBER 28, 2018
FOR REHABILITATION OF SCHOOL BUILDING IMPACT IN SIGI REGENCY
Building Name : SIDONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Coordinate : 1,0955 S ; 119,9070 E

Address : Poros Palu -Kulawi Street, Sidondo Village Survey Date : May 16th, 2020
Building Function : Classroom Level of Damage : Lightly Damage
Number of Stories : 1 (one)
Building Area : 144,00
1 st Floor : 144,00
Other Information : Buildings cannot be used for teaching and learning
Object Identification
Damage Plan Proposed Improvement Method Quantity Unit Notes
No. (Image and Type of Damage)
A. Ampig wall damage Replace ampig wall with kalsiboard
Scope of work:
1. Demolition of ampig brick walls 2,025 m3
2. Installation of kalsiboard frame and kalsiboard cover 6mm
27 m2
120x240 cm
B. Floor damage Dismantle the rebate floor and replace it with

a ceramic floor
Scope of work:
1. Demolition of the rebate floor 137 m2
2. Installation of 40 x 40 cm ceramic floor 137 m2
C. Ceiling damage Dismantle the damaged ceiling and

and replace a new ceiling
Scope of work:
1. Demolition of damaged / weathered ceiling 144 m2
2. Demolition of the damaged / weathered ceiling frame 144 m2
3. Installation of ceiling frames 144 m2
4. Installation of 3 mm plywood ceiling cover 144 m2
1. SDN SIDONDO _ SURVEY, IDENTIFICATION, AND DOCUMENTATION Page 1 of 5


1 st Floor : 144,00
D. Damage to the roof cover dismantle a perforated roof and

replace it with a new roof
Scope of work:
1. Demolition of perforated / leaky roof 25,2 m2
Gambar tidak tersedia 2. Installation of new roof coverings 25,2 m2
E. Damaged partitions / barriers between classrooms Repair and strengthen partition walls / barriers
between classrooms
Scope of work:
1. Demolition of partition walls and partition frame 10,5 m2
2. Demolition of the partition frame support wall 1,575 m3
3. Strengthening by installing a 10x15 latei beam - K-200
0,105 m3
Quality
4. Iron on the latei beam 16,9116 kg
5. Formwork in Latei Beams 2,8 m2
6. Installation of partition frames 0,11 m3
7. Installation of partitions / barriers between new classrooms 14 m2


1 st Floor : 144,00
F. Damage to the Plastering Column Terrace Repairing damaged terrace column plastering
Scope of work:
1. Scrape / clean up the column area to be repaired 1,4 m2
2. Plastering column work 1,4 m2
3. Coating column work 1,4 m2
G. Cracks in the corners of the frame Repair / strengthen plastering in the corner area
of the frame
Scope of work:
1. Scrape the plastered wall area with cracks 4,2 m2
2. Reinforcement by adding 1/4 "woven wire 4,2 m2
3. Plastering wall work 4,2 m2
4. Coating wall work 4,2 m2


1 st Floor : 144,00
H. Repair of electrical installations and Improving the electrical installation network and
installation of lighting points installing lighting points on classrooms and terraces
Scope of work:
Installation of 5/8 "diameter electrical cable pipe + NYM
1. 30 m
cable 3 x 2.5
2. Outlet installation work 2 bh
3. Double switch installation work 2 bh
4. Light point installation work 5 bh
I. Lisplank damage Disassemble and replace lisplank with kalsiplank

Scope of work:
1. Demolition of old Lisplank 32 m'
2. Installation of 20 cm GRC kalsiplank 60 m'


1 st Floor : 144,00
J. Painting Repaint walls, columns, frames, and roofs

Scope of work:
1. Cleaning the surface of the area to be painted 105 m2
2. Work of painting indoor walls 168 m2
3. Work of painting outdoor walls 119 m2
4. Work of painting terrace columns 9,8 m2
5. Work of painting frames, windows, and doors 84 m2
6. Roof painting work 252 m2
7. Lisplank painting work 18 m2
8. Ceiling painting work 144 m3

PAKULI ISLAMIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, BUILDING 1 May 16th, 2020

LIGHTLY
DAMAGED
Poros Palu-Kulawi Street, Pakuli Village
1 ADDRESS
Gumbasa district, Sigi regency, Cental Sulawesi Province
2 COORDINATE 1,2233 S ; 119,94500 E

3 BUILDING OWNER Yayasan Al-Khairaat
5 TYPES OF STRUCTURES Beton Bertulang dan Dinding Pasangan (Masonry Wall and Bond Concrete)
7 ESTIMATION OF FLOOR AREA 285,57 m2

I
BUILDING
2 Number of damaged walls v <10% v 10-20 % >20%
5 v <10% 10-20 % >20%
stairs
6 v <10% 10-20 % >20%
sewers

1 Reinforcing concrete columns with
Chicken mess
2 Replacement of Rebate Floors
with Ceramic Flooring
4 Repair of cracked walls in the frame area
with wiremesh
6 Listplank replacement
7 Painting walls, columns, frame, ceilings
and roof coverings
2.1. MIS PAKULI GEDUNG 1 _ Technical Verification Page 1 of 2


LIGHTLY
DAMAGED
1 NEEDS OF BUILDING
Toilet 1 Unit
Area 285,57 m2
AREA 350 m2

Total Students 100
Number of Stories 1
Total Room 4


Building Name : PAKULI ISLAMIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, BUILDING 1 Coordinate : 1,2233 S ; 119,94500 E
Address : Poros Palu-Kulawi Street, Pakuli Village Survey Date : May 16th, 2020
Building Function : Classroom Level of Damage : LIGHTLY DAMAGED
1 st Floor : 285,57
A. Damage to the Concrete Column Repair and strengthen concrete columns

Chicken Mess
Scope of work
2. Installation of chicken mess 4,9 m2

a ceramic floor
Scope of work
1. Demolition of the rebate floor 277,02 m2
2. Installation of 40 x 40 cm ceramic floor 277,02 m2

Scope of work
1. Demolition of damaged / weathered ceiling 371,7 m2
2. Demolition of the damaged / weathered ceiling frame 185,85 m2
3. Installation of ceiling frames 185,85 m2
4. Installation of 3 mm plywood ceiling cover 371,7 m2
2.1. MIS PAKULI GEDUNG 1 _ SURVEY, IDENTIFICATION, AND DOCUMENTATION Page 1 of 3

1 st Floor : 285,57
D. Cracks in the frame area Repair / strengthen plastering in the frame area
Scope of work
E. Repair of electrical installations and Improving the electrical installation network and
Scope of work
1. 40 m
cable 3 x 2.5
2. Outlet installation work 4 pcs
3. Double switch installation work 4 pcs
4. Light point installation work 8 pcs

1 st Floor : 285,57
F. Lisplank damage Disassemble and replace lisplank with kalsiplank

Scope of work
1. Demolition of old Lisplank 110,8 m'
2. Installation of 20 cm GRC kalsiplank 110,8 m'
G. Painting Repaint walls, columns, frames, and roofs

Scope of work
1. Cleaning the surface of the area to be painted 139,2 m2
2. Work of painting indoor walls 457,5 m2
3. Work of painting outdoor walls 205,5 m2
4. Work of painting frames, windows, and doors 72,9 m2
5. Ceiling painting work 371,7 m2
7. Lisplank painting work 33,24 m2


LIGHTLY
DAMAGED
Poros Palu-Kulawi Street, Pakuli Village
1 ADDRESS
2 COORDINATE 1,22330 S ; 119,94511 E

3 BUILDING OWNER Yayasan Al-Khairaat
5 TYPES OF STRUCTURES Dinding Pasangan (Masonry Wall)

I
BUILDING
3 Number of damaged columns <10 % v 10-20% >20%
4 Number of damaged walls <10% v 10 -20% >20%
6 Number of damaged roofs <10 % v 10 -20% >20 %
1 Number of damaged columns <10% v 10-20 % >20%
2 Number of damaged walls <10% v 10-20 % >20%
5 v <10% 10-20 % >20%
stairs
6 <10% 10-20 % v >20%
sewers

1 Replacement of rebate floor with ceramic
floor
classrooms and strengthening of the partition
frame
3
Ceiling frame and ceiling cover replacement
4 Strengthening wood columns
5 Repairs cracked walls with wire wiremesh
6 Replacement of gording and roof coverings

7 Replace the door
8 Replacement for window frame
9 Strengthening the masonry foundation
10. Procurement of 1 New Toilet Unit 2 Cubicles


LIGHTLY
DAMAGED
1 NEEDS OF BUILDING
Toilet 1 Unit
Area 310,64 m2
The new reconstruction 1 Unit
Information on new reconstruction
AREA 1200 m2

Total Students > 150
Number of Stories 1
Total Room 4


1 st Floor : 310,64
A. Damage to the masonry faundation Repairing damaged masonry foundation
Scope of work:
1. Masonry foundation 0,5 m3
2. Plastering column work 4 m2
3. Coating column work 4 m2

a ceramic floor
Scope of work:

Scope of work:

1 st Floor : 310,64
D. Damage to the roof cover Dismantle a perforated roof and

replace it with a new roof
Scope of work:
1. Demolition of perforated / leaky roof 273,36 m2
2. Demolition of damaged / weathered ginder 136,68 m2
3. Pekerjaan pemasangan gording baru 136,68 m2
4. Installation of new roof coverings 273,36 m2
E. Damaged partitions / barriers between classrooms Repair and strengthen partition walls / barriers
between classrooms
Scope of work:
1. Demolition of partition walls and partition frame 63 m2
3.
Installation of partitions / barriers between new classrooms 63 m2

1 st Floor : 310,64
F. Column damage Strengthen the wood column by adding wiremesh
Scope of work:
G. Wall Damage Repair / strengthen plastering in the corner

area of the frame
Scope of work:
2. Patch the crack hole with cement paste injection 2 kg
4. Plaster wall work 23,298 m2

1 st Floor : 310,64
H. Repair of electrical installations and Improving the electrical installation network and
Scope of work:
1. 57,8 m
cable 3 x 2.5
I. Damage to the Door Replace the damaged door

Scope of work:
1. Dismantling the old door 6 pcs
2. Installation of new doors 6 pcs Lumpsum

1 st Floor : 310,64
J. Damage to window frame Replacing a Damaged / Weathered Window frame

Scope of work:
1. Disassemble the old frame 7 pcs
2. Installing a New Frame (Wooden Beams 5/10) 0,481 m3
3. Installing Harmonica Wire 26,46 m2
K. Painting Repaint walls, columns, frames, and roofs

Scope of work:
5. Roof painting work 341,70 m2
L. Pengadaan Toilet Baru 2 Bilik Make 1 Unit of 4 Toilet Rooms for Teachers and Students
1. Procurement of 1 Toilet 4 Chamber Unit (1.2 m x 1.0 m) 4,80 m2 Lump Sum

INPRES LAMBARA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, BUILDING 1 May 16th, 2020

LIGHTLY
DAMAGED
Poros Palu-Kulawi Street, Lambara Village
1 ADDRESS
2 COORDINATE 1,16603 S ; 119,92993 E

5 TYPES OF STRUCTURES Dinding Pasangan dan Beton Bertulang (Masonry Wall and Bond Concrete)
6 NUMBER OF STORIES 1 (ONE)

I
BUILDING
4 Number of damaged walls <10% 10 -20% v >20%
2 Number of damaged walls v <10% 10-20 % >20%
5 v <10% 10-20 % >20%
stairs
6 <10% 10-20 % v >20%
sewers

1 Replacement of Rebate Floors with Ceramic
Flooring
2
3 Reinforcing the column with wiremesh
4 Repair cracked walls with anchors and
wirewiremesh / kawat ayam
5 Painting on the frame
6 Painting of doors and windows
7 Painting on the wall
8 Painting the roof
9 Repair Installation
3.1. SD INPRES LAMBARA GEDUNG 1 _ Technical Verification Page 1 of 2


LIGHTLY
DAMAGED
1 NEEDS OF BUILDING
Toilet 1 Unit
Area 250,2 m2
AREA 1000 m2

Number of Stories 1
Total Room 4

1 I Ketut Sulendra, ST, MT Team Leader

Building Name : INPRES LAMBARA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, BUILDING 1 Coordinate : 1,16603 S ; 119,92993 E
Address : Poros Palu-Kulawi Street, Lambara Village Survey Date : May 16th, 2020
Number of Stories : 1 (ONE)
1 st Floor : 250,20
A. Floor damage Dismantle the rebate floor and replace it with

a ceramic floor
Scope of work:
B. Ceiling damage Dismantle the damaged ceiling and

Scope of work:
3.1. SD INPRES LAMBARA GEDUNG 1 _ SURVEY, IDENTIFICATION, AND DOCUMENTATION Page 1 of 3

1 st Floor : 250,20
C. Column damage Strengthen the wood column by adding wiremesh
Scope of work:
D. Walls damage Repair / strengthen plastering in the corner

area of the frame
Scope of work:

1 st Floor : 250,20
Scope of work:
1. 54,8 m
cable 3 x 2.5
4. Light point installation work 8 bh
F. Painting Repaint walls, columns, frames, and roofs

Scope of work:


LIGHTLY
DAMAGED
1 ADDRESS
2 COORDINATE 1,16603 S ; 119,92993 E

5 TYPES OF STRUCTURES Dinding Pasangan dan Beton Bertulang (Masonry Wall and Bond Concrete)
6 NUMBER OF STORIES 1 (ONE)

I
BUILDING
4 Number of damaged walls <10% 10 -20% v >20%
5 v <10% 10-20 % >20%
stairs
6 <10% 10-20 % v >20%
sewers

1 Replacement of Rebate Floors with Ceramic
Flooring
2
3 Reinforcing the column with wiremesh
4 Repair cracked walls with anchors and
wirewiremesh / kawat ayam
5 Painting on the frame
6 Painting of doors and windows
7 Painting on the wall
8 Painting the roof
9 Repair Installation


LIGHTLY
DAMAGED
1 NEEDS OF BUILDING
Toilet 1 Unit
Area 250,2 m2
AREA 1000 m2

Number of Stories 1
Total Room 4


1 st Floor : 234,00
A. Floor damage Dismantle the rebate floor and replace it with

a ceramic floor
Scope of work:
1. Demolition of the rebate floor 234 m2
2. Installation of 40 x 40 cm ceramic floor 234 m2
B. Damaged partitions / barriers between classrooms Repair and strengthen partition walls / barriers
between classrooms
Scope of work:
0,105 m3
Quality
replace a new ceiling
Scope of work:

1 st Floor : 234,00
D. Walls damage Repair / strengthen plastering on cracked wall areas
Scope of work:
Scope of work:
1. 35 m
cable 3 x 2.5
Gambar tidak tersedia 3. Double switch installation work 2 pcs

1 st Floor : 234,00
F. Damage to window, door, and frame

Disassemble and replace the damage frame, window and door
Scope of work:
1. Disassembly of the window, door, and frame 0,69225 m3
2. Manufacture and installation of window, door, and frame 0,69225 m3
3. manufacture and installation of panel doors 1 pcs
4. Manufacture and installation of window glass 2,415 m2
G. Lisplank damage Disassemble and replace lisplank with kalsiplank
Scope of work:
H. Painting Repaint walls, columns, frames, and roofs

Scope of work:
1. Cleaning the surface of the area to be painted 132 m2
4. Work of painting terrace columns 19,6 m2
6. Ceiling painting work 308 m2

INPRES 1 KALUKU TINGGU ELEMENTARY SCHOOL May 17th, 2020

LIGHTLY
DAMAGED
Tandalonggo Street, Pewunu Village
1 ADDRESS
Dolo Barat district, Sigi regency, Central Sulawesi Province
2 COORDINATE 1,0261 S ; 119,8600 E

3 BUILDING OWNER Dinas Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Kabupaten Sigi
5 TYPES OF STRUCTURES

I
BUILDING
4 Number of damaged ceilings <10% v 10-20 % >20%
5 v <10% 10-20 % >20%
stairs
6 v <10% 10-20 % >20%
sewers

1 Strengthening Column with 1/4 "wire
wiremesh
2
Repair of partition walls / barriers between
classes and strengthening the partition frame
4 Repairs cracked walls with wiremesh

6 Chipping masonry, cement paste injection,
plaster again
7 Change the classroom door lock
8 ceiling and roof coverings
4. SD INPRES 1 KALUKU TINGGU _ Technical Verification Page 1 of 2

INPRES 1 KALUKU TINGGU ELEMENTARY SCHOOL May 17th, 2020

LIGHTLY
DAMAGED
1 NEEDS OF BUILDING
Toilet 1 Unit
Area 254,88 m2
AREA 300 m2

Total Students 80
Number of Stories 1
Total Room 4

4. SD INPRES 1 KALUKU TINGGU _ Technical Verification Page 2 of 2

Building Name : INPRES 1 KALUKU TINGGU ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Coordinate : 1,0261 S ; 119,8600 E
Address : Tandalonggo Street, Pewunu Village Survey Date : May 17th, 2020
1 st Floor : 254,88
A. Column damage Repair and strengthen columns by

adding 1/4 "wire wiremesh
Scope of work:
2. Patch the crack hole with cement paste injection 0,5 kg
B. Damaged partitions / barriers between classrooms Repair and strengthen partition walls / barriers
between classrooms
Scope of work:
0,105 m3
Quality
4. SD INPRES 1 KALUKU TINGGU _ SURVEY, IDENTIFICATION, AND DOCUMENTATION Page 1 of 4

1 st Floor : 254,88

Scope of work:
D. Walls damage Repair / strengthen plastering on cracked

wall areas
Scope of work:

1 st Floor : 254,88
Scope of work:
1. 40 m
cable 3 x 2.5
Picture is not available 4. Light point installation work 7 bh
F. Damage to the foundation Repairing damaged masonry foundation
Scope of work:
1. Scrape the plastered foundation area where there are cracks 3 m2

3. Reinforcement by adding 1/4 "woven wire 1,5 kg
4. Plastering wall work 3 m2
5. Coating column work 3 m2

1 st Floor : 254,88
G. Door reparation Change the planting door lock

Scope of work:
1. Installation of planting door locks 4 bh

Scope of work:
2. Work of painting indoor walls 276 m2
3. Work of painting outdoor walls 192 m2
5. Old plafond painting work 250,635 m2
6. New plafond painting work 83,545 m2

INPRES PANDERE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, BUILDING 1 May 17th, 2020

LIGHTLY
DAMAGED
1 ALAMAT
2 KOORDINAT 1,19701 S ; 119,94274 E

3 PEMILIK BANGUNAN Department of Education and Culture, Sigi Regency
4 FUNGSI BANGUNAN Classroom
5 JENIS STRUKTUR Dinding Pasangan dan Beton Bertulang (Masonry Wall and Bond Concrete)
6 JUMLAH LANTAI BANGUNAN 1 (one)
7 PERKIRAAN LUAS BANGUNAN 189 m2

I
BUILDING
4 Number of damaged ceilings v <10% 10-20 % >20%
5 v <10% 10-20 % >20%
stairs
6 <10% v 10-20 % >20%
sewers

1
2 Repair the masonry foundation
3 Lisplank replacement
4 Repair of cracked walls with anchor and wire
wiremesh
classes
6 Repair of stairs
7 Painting
5.1. SD INPRES PANDERE GEDUNG 1 _ Technical Verification Page 1 of 2


LIGHTLY
DAMAGED
1 NEEDS OF BUILDING
Toilet 1 Unit
Area 189 m2
AREA 1000 m2

Number of Stories 1
Total Room 4


Building Name : INPRES PANDERE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, BUILDING 1 Koordinat : 1,19701 S ; 119,94274 E
Address : Poros Palu-Kulawi Street, Lambara Village Tanggal Survey : May 17th, 2020
Building Function : Classroom Kondisi Kerusakan : LIGHTLY DAMAGED
1 st Floor : 189,00
A. Ceiling damage Disassemble the damaged ceiling and

Scope of work:
Strengthen the terrace column by adding wiremesh wire /

B. Damage to the Terrace Column
chicken wire
Lingkup Pekerjaan:
5.1. SD INPRES PANDERE GEDUNG 1 _ SURVEY, IDENTIFICATION, AND DOCUMENTATION Page 1 of 4

1 st Floor : 189,00
C. Wall damage Repair cracked walls with 1/4 '' wiremesh wire
Scope of work:

D. Masonry Foundation Damage Repairing damaged masonry foundation

Scope of work:
1. Cleaning of peeling plastered masonry 4,20 m2
2. Plastering work 4,20 m2
3. Coating work 4,20 m2

1 st Floor : 189,00
Scope of work:
1. 48 m
cable 3 x 2.5
F. Lisplank damage Disassemble and replace lisplank with kalsiplank

Scope of work:

1 st Floor : 189,00
G. Damage to Partitions between Classrooms Repair and strengthen partition walls / barriers
between classrooms
Scope of work:
3. Installation of partitions / barriers between new classrooms 24,50 m2

Scope of work:
6. Lisplank painting work 15 m2


LIGHTLY
DAMAGED
1 ALAMAT
2 KOORDINAT 1,1967 S ; 119,9425 E

3 PEMILIK BANGUNAN Department of Education and Culture, Sigi Regency
4 FUNGSI BANGUNAN Classroom
5 JENIS STRUKTUR Beton Bertulang dan Dinding Pasangan (Masonry Wall and Bond Concrete)
6 JUMLAH LANTAI BANGUNAN 1 (one)
7 PERKIRAAN LUAS BANGUNAN 203,28 m2

I
BUILDING
4 Number of damaged ceilings v <10% 10-20 % >20%
5 v <10% 10-20 % >20%
stairs
6 v <10% 10-20 % >20%
sewers

1 the ceiling cover on the dust is weathered,
and replaced with a new one
2 cracks in the wall between the frame,
chipping with chicken mess, then plaster
again
Plaster side / back wall weathered then
3
chipping, add chicken mess and back plaster
4 chipping stone masonry, cement paste

injection, and back plaster
5 wall painting, column, frame, ceiling and roof
cover


LIGHTLY
DAMAGED
1 NEEDS OF BUILDING
Toilet 1 Unit
Area 203,28 m2
AREA 300 m2

Total Students 150
Number of Stories 1
Total Room 3


Building Name : INPRES PANDERE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, BUILDING 2 Coordinate : 1,1967 S ; 119,9425 E
1 st Floor : 203,28
A. Ceiling damage Disassemble the damaged ceiling and

Scope of work:
B. Retakan pada sudut-sudut kusen Repair / strengthen plastering in the corner area of the
cracked frame
Scope of work:
C. Damage to the rear wall Repair / strengthen plastering on walls that are peeled off due
to moisture
Scope of work:
2. Trasram's work 18,55 m2

Building Name : INPRES PANDERE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, BUILDING 2 Coordinate : 1,1967 S ; 119,9425 E
1 st Floor : 203,28
D. Foundation Damage Repairing damaged foundation

Scope of work:
1. Scrape the plastered foundation area where there are cracks 3 m2

3. Plastering work 3 m2
E. Painting Repaint walls, columns, frames, and roofs

Scope of work:
4. Pek. Pengecatan kolom teras 17,15 m2
6. New ceiling painting work 225 m2
7. Old ceiling painting work 45 m2

TADULAKO UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING - DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
CONCRETE LABORATORY AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Bumi Tadulako Campus Tondo Palu ~ Tel. (0451) 454014 - Psw 170
PROJECT : SCHOOL ASSESSMENT IN SIGI REGENCY TESTING DATE : 16 -17 MEI 2020
TECHNICAL PLANNING DED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL/INPRES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL/ISLAMIC
WORK : ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TESTED BY : ADHITYA HA, ST/ELLYNI DWI FORTUNA, ST.
LOCATION : SIGI REGENCY CHECKED BY : I KETUT SULENDRA, ST., MT.

TESTING OF CONCRETE STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS WITH CONCRETE HAMMER
SNI 03-4430-1997
Calibration (Test Anvil) = 1,00 (N/NR = 80 ± 2)
BUILDING CODE SIDONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Note
Punch angle 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90°
TEST CODE NUMBER
1 33 28 32 28 30 ELEMENTS OF COLUMN STRUCTURE
2 34 28 30 30 30 TESTED RANDOMLY ON THE BUILDING
3 34 30 28 30 29
4 30 30 30 28 28
CONCRETE HAMMER 5 31 30 30 30 26
VALUE (R ) 6 35 26 31 31 29
7 33 30 28 32 29
8 32 30 30 29 27
9 30 29 30 28 29
10 31 25 30 30 27
R MAXIMUM 35 30 32 32 30 Witnessed by: Signature
R MINIMUM 30 25 28 28 26
R Average 32,30 28,60 29,90 29,60 28,40
Standard Deviation 1,77 1,84 1,20 1,35 1,35 Masta, S. Pd.
Variation Coefficient 5,47 6,43 4,00 4,56 4,75
ESTIMATED STRENGTH IN
329 271 291 286 268
CORRECTED PRESSURE (kg/cm2) 289
TADULAKO UNIVERSITY

SNI 03-4430-1997
BUILDING CODE PAKULI ISLAMIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, 1
Note
Punch angle 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90°
TEST CODE NUMBER
1 31 33 33 36 32
2 32 30 35 35 32
3 33 29 35 34 32
4 29 29 32 36 30
VALUE (R ) 6 30 30 33 34 32
7 28 29 33 31 34
8 29 30 34 31 33
9 29 29 34 32 32
10 33 30 33 32 32
R MINIMUM 28 29 32 31 30
R Average 30,40 29,90 33,50 33,40 31,90
Standard Deviation 1,78 1,20 0,97 1,90 1,20 Siti Fatimah, S. Pd.I.
299 291 349 347 323
TADULAKO UNIVERSITY

SNI 03-4430-1997
BUILDING CODE PAKULI ISLAMIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, 2
Note
Punch angle 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90°
TEST CODE NUMBER
1 28 31 25 30 30
2 28 32 24 28 32
3 31 30 27 29 27
4 28 32 29 30 32
VALUE (R ) 6 30 32 25 25 31
7 28 33 29 27 33
8 26 28 26 27 32
9 30 28 26 28 33
10 30 30 25 30 28
R MINIMUM 26 28 24 25 27
R Average 28,70 30,40 26,40 28,00 31,10
Standard Deviation 1,49 1,90 1,78 1,76 2,13 Siti Fatimah, S. Pd.I.
273 299 238 262 310
CORRECTED PRESSURE (kg/cm2)
276
TADULAKO UNIVERSITY

SNI 03-4430-1997
BUILDING CODE INPERS 1 LAMBARA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, 1
Note
Punch angle 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90°
TEST CODE NUMBER
1 34 33 42 38 38
2 34 32 41 38 40
3 34 34 42 40 40
4 32 32 38 35 36
VALUE (R ) 6 32 32 36 39 38
7 32 34 38 36 40
8 33 34 42 38 40
9 33 34 40 36 40
10 34 35 40 36 40
R MINIMUM 32 32 36 35 36
R Average 33,50 33,60 40,10 37,20 39,10
Standard Deviation 1,51 1,35 2,13 1,62 1,37 Ramli Lupoyo, S.Pd.
349 350 463 412 445
CORRECTED PRESSURE (kg/cm2)
404
TADULAKO UNIVERSITY

SNI 03-4430-1997
BUILDING CODE INPERS 1 LAMBARA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, 2
Note
Punch angle 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90°
TEST CODE NUMBER
1 34 34 34 31 34
2 38 34 32 30 34
3 32 36 33 30 34
4 38 32 34 30 34
VALUE (R ) 6 36 34 32 30 32
7 36 32 32 30 32
8 42 34 32 32 34
9 46 36 32 32 32
10 38 36 31 30 34
R MINIMUM 32 32 31 30 32
R Average 37,80 34,20 32,60 30,70 33,20
Standard Deviation 3,94 1,48 1,07 0,95 1,03 Ramli Lupoyo, S.Pd.
422 360 334 304 344
TADULAKO UNIVERSITY

SNI 03-4430-1997
BUILDING CODE INPRES 1 KALUKU TINGGU ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Note
Punch angle 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90°
TEST CODE NUMBER
1 32 24 32 30 26
2 30 22 30 30 27
3 31 26 30 29 29
4 34 24 29 31 26
VALUE (R ) 6 30 26 30 29 24
7 32 25 29 29 26
8 34 24 28 28 25
9 29 23 28 28 29
10 34 24 26 28 26
R MINIMUM 29 22 26 28 24
R Average 32,00 24,10 29,00 29,00 26,20
Standard Deviation 1,94 1,29 1,63 1,05 1,75 Idham Chalid, ST.
324 205 277 277 235
TADULAKO UNIVERSITY

SNI 03-4430-1997
BUILDING CODE INPRES PANDARA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, 1
Note
Punch angle 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90°
TEST CODE NUMBER
1 24 24 26 24 27
2 22 24 27 26 24
3 26 26 26 26 25
4 26 26 28 28 24
VALUE (R ) 6 24 26 30 28 26
7 23 26 28 24 26
8 26 28 30 28 24
9 27 26 30 27 24
10 27 26 30 26 24
R MINIMUM 22 24 26 24 24
R Average 25,00 25,60 28,30 26,40 25,20
Standard Deviation 1,70 1,26 1,64 1,51 1,48 Elsi
218 226 266 238 221
TADULAKO UNIVERSITY

SNI 03-4430-1997
BUILDING CODE INPRES PANDARA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, 2
Note
Punch angle 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90° 90°
TEST CODE NUMBER
1 28 32 26 31 34
2 31 32 26 32 34
3 28 30 26 34 36
4 32 29 26 32 35
VALUE (R ) 6 26 32 26 32 35
7 27 30 26 36 34
8 29 28 26 34 34
9 28 30 25 33 35
10 30 28 26 32 32
R MINIMUM 26 28 25 31 32
R Average 28,90 30,30 26,10 32,90 34,10
Standard Deviation 1,85 1,64 0,74 1,45 1,29 Elsi
276 297 234 339 359
RECAPITULATION OF EMPLOYMENT COSTS
Building Name : SIDONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Location (Address) : Poros Palu -Kulawi Street, Sidondo Village
Coordinate : 1,0955 S ; 119,9070 E
Building Function : Classroom
Building Area : 144,00 m2
No Description Total Cost
A Replace ampig wall with kalsiboard Rp 7.247.904,75

B Floor work Rp 29.579.648,40
C Ceiling work Rp 30.500.700,00
D Roof work Rp 3.717.273,00
E Work on partitions between classrooms Rp 4.151.878,58
F Column work Rp 219.168,94
G Work in repairing walls Rp 920.510,82
H MEP work Rp 3.237.613,50
I Lisplank work Rp 4.475.916,67
J Painting work Rp 30.379.630,24
The amount of cost Rp 114.430.244,89

General costs and maximum profits of 25% x I Rp -
VAT (Value Added Tax)10% x I Rp -
THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF WORK COSTS ( I + II + III ) Rp 114.430.244,89

BE ROUNDED Rp 114.430.000,00
Be calculated Seratus Empat Belas Juta Empat Ratus Tiga Puluh Ribu Rupiah
1. SDN SIDONDO _ RECAPITULATION OF EMPLOYMENT COSTS Page 1 of 5

REAL OF COST ESTIMATION - BILL OF QUANTITY (BOQ)
Location (Address) : Poros Palu -Kulawi Street, Sidondo Village
Coordinate : 1,0955 S ; 119,9070 E
Quantity and Cost
No Description
Unit Quantity Unit price Total cost
1 2 3 4 5 6
A Replace ampig wall with kalsiboard

1. Demolition of ampig brick walls m3 2,03 Rp 719.990,00 Rp 1.457.979,75
2. Installation of kalsiboard frame and kalsiboard cover 6mm 120x240 cm m2 27 Rp 214.441,67 Rp 5.789.925,00
TOTAL A Rp 7.247.904,75
B Floor work
1. Demolition of the rebate floor m2 136,80 Rp 27.500,00 Rp 3.762.000,00
2. Installation of 40 x 40 cm ceramic floor m2 136,80 Rp 188.725,50 Rp 25.817.648,40
TOTAL B Rp 29.579.648,40
C Ceiling work
1. Demolition of damaged / weathered ceiling m2 144,00 Rp 19.416,67 Rp 2.796.000,00
2. Demolition of the damaged / weathered ceiling frame m2 144,00 Rp 29.125,00 Rp 4.194.000,00
3. Installation of ceiling frames m2 144,00 Rp 112.318,75 Rp 16.173.900,00
4. Installation of 3 mm plywood ceiling cover m2 144,00 Rp 50.950,00 Rp 7.336.800,00
TOTAL C Rp 30.500.700,00
D Roof work
1. Demolition of perforated / leaky roof m2 25,20 Rp 23.833,33 Rp 600.600,00
2. Installation of new roof coverings m2 25,20 Rp 123.677,50 Rp 3.116.673,00
TOTAL D Rp 3.717.273,00
E Work on partitions between classrooms
1. Demolition of partition walls and partition frame m2 10,50 Rp 7.533,33 Rp 79.100,00
2. Demolition of the partition frame support wall m3 1,58 Rp 719.990,00 Rp 1.133.984,25
3. Strengthening by installing a 10x15 latei beam - K-200 Quality m3 0,11 Rp 892.350,57 Rp 93.696,81
4. Iron on the latei beam kg 16,91 Rp 15.613,50 Rp 264.049,27
5. Formwork in Latei Beams m2 2,80 Rp 319.040,00 Rp 893.312,00
6. Installation of partition frames m3 0,110 Rp 6.624.875,00 Rp 728.736,25
7. Installation of partitions / barriers between new classrooms m2 14,00 Rp 68.500,00 Rp 959.000,00
TOTAL E Rp 4.151.878,58
F Column work
1. Scrape / clean up the column area to be repaired m2 1,40 Rp 47.666,67 Rp 66.733,33
2. Plastering column work m2 1,40 Rp 68.148,08 Rp 95.407,31
3. Coating column work m2 1,40 Rp 40.734,50 Rp 57.028,30
TOTAL F Rp 219.168,94
G Work in repairing walls
1. Scrape the plastered wall area with cracks m2 4,20 Rp 47.666,67 Rp 200.200,00
2. Reinforcement by adding 1/4 "woven wire m2 4,20 Rp 62.620,00 Rp 263.004,00
3. Plastering wall work m2 4,20 Rp 68.148,08 Rp 286.221,92
4. Coating wall work m2 4,20 Rp 40.734,50 Rp 171.084,90
TOTAL G Rp 920.510,82
H MEP work
1. Installation of 5/8 "diameter electrical cable pipe + NYM cable 3 x 2.5 m 30,00 Rp 78.821,25 Rp 2.364.637,50
2. Outlet installation work bh 2,00 Rp 89.512,50 Rp 179.025,00
3. Double switch installation work bh 2,00 Rp 43.225,50 Rp 86.451,00
4. Light point installation work bh 5,00 Rp 121.500,00 Rp 607.500,00
TOTAL H Rp 3.237.613,50
I Lisplank work
1. Demolition of old Lisplank m' 32,00 Rp 23.833,33 Rp 762.666,67
2. Installation of 20 cm GRC kalsiplank m' 60,00 Rp 61.887,50 Rp 3.713.250,00
TOTAL I Rp 4.475.916,67
J Painting work
1. Cleaning the surface of the area to be painted m2 105,00 Rp 16.130,00 Rp 1.693.650,00
2. Work of painting indoor walls m2 168,00 Rp 25.786,00 Rp 4.332.048,00
3. Work of painting outdoor walls m2 119,00 Rp 30.044,80 Rp 3.575.331,20
4. Work of painting terrace columns m2 9,80 Rp 30.044,80 Rp 294.439,04
5. Work of painting frames, windows, and doors m2 84,00 Rp 45.507,00 Rp 3.822.588,00
6. Roof painting work m2 252,00 Rp 27.310,00 Rp 6.882.120,00
7. Lisplank painting work m2 18,00 Rp 60.367,00 Rp 1.086.606,00
8. Ceiling painting work m2 144,00 Rp 60.367,00 Rp 8.692.848,00
TOTAL J Rp 30.379.630,24
THE AMOUNT OF COST Rp 114.430.244,89
1. SDN SIDONDO _ BILL OF QUANTITY (BOQ) Page 2 of 5

RINCIAN KEBUTUHAN BAHAN - BILL OF MATERIALS
Lokasi (Alamat) : Poros Palu -Kulawi Street,
Sidondo Village
Lokasi (Koordinat) : 1,0955 S ; 119,9070 E
Fungsi Bangunan : Classroom
Jumlah Lantai Bangunan : 1 (one)
Luas Bangunan : 144,00
Rincian Bahan
No Uraian Pekerjaan Volume
Sat Pekerjaan Kuantitas Bahan Keterangan
1 2 3 4 5 6
A Penggantian ampig bata dengan kalsiboard

1. Demolition of ampig brick walls m3 2,03
2. Installation of kalsiboard frame and kalsiboard cover 6mm 120x240 cm m2 27
 Baja Ringan C.75.75 m' 59
 Baut/Screw bh 216
 Sekrup Gybsum kg 2
 Calciboard 120 x 240 Tebal 6 mm lbr 9
B Pekerjaan Lantai
1. Demolition of the rebate floor m2 136,80
2. Installation of 40 x 40 cm ceramic floor m2 136,80
 Keramik 40 x 40 bh 907
 Portland Cement (PC) kg 1341 27 zak
 Semen Warna kg 82
 Pasir Pasang m3 6
C Pekerjaan Plafond
1. Demolition of damaged / weathered ceiling m2 144,00
2. Demolition of the damaged / weathered ceiling frame m2 144,00
3. Installation of ceiling frames m2 144,00
 Kaso-kaso 5 x 7 cm m3 2
 Paku 7 – 10 cm kg 36
4. Installation of 3 mm plywood ceiling cover m2 144,00
 Tripleks 120.240.3 mm lbr 54
 Paku Tripleks kg 4
D Pekerjaan Atap
1. Demolition of perforated / leaky roof m2 25,20
2. Installation of new roof coverings m2 25,20
 Atap Bitumen Monolayer (200 x 95 cm, T=3 mm) lbr 18
 Paku biasa ½”-1” kg 1
E Pekerjaan Partisi / Sekat Antar Ruang Kelas

1. Demolition of partition walls and partition frame m2 10,50
2. Demolition of the partition frame support wall m3 1,58
3. Strengthening by installing a 10x15 latei beam - K-200 Quality m3 0,11
 Portland Cement (PC) kg 37 0,75 zak
 Pasir Beton m3 0,63
 Kerikil Spilit 2/3 m3 0,76
 Air ltr 23
4. Iron on the latei beam kg 16,91
 Besi Polos Dia. 8 mm kg 11,85 3 btg
 Kawat Beton kg 0,25 1 ikat
5. Formwork in Latei Beams m2 2,80
 Papan Kayu 2/20 lbr 7,0
 Paku biasa 2" - 5" kg 1,1
 Balok Kayu 5/7 Kls.III m3 0,1
 Multipleks 9 mm lbr 1,0
 Dolken Kayu Galam Dia. 8-10/4 m btg 5,6
6. Installation of partition frames m3 0,11
 Balok Kayu 5/10 m3 0,1
 Paku kg 3,5
 Lem Kayu kg 2,8
7. Installation of partitions / barriers between new classrooms m2 14,00
 Papan Kayu 2/20 lbr 17
1. SDN SIDONDO _ BILL OF MATERIALS Page 3 of 5

Sidondo Village
Rincian Bahan
1 2 3 4 5 6
F Pekerjaan Kolom
1. Scrape / clean up the column area to be repaired m2 1,40
2. Plastering column work m2 1,40
 Pasir Pasang m3 0,03
 Portland Cement (PC) kg 10,89 0,25 zak
3. Coating column work m2 1,40
G Pekerjaan Perbaikan Dinding

1. Scrape the plastered wall area with cracks m2 4,20
2. Reinforcement by adding 1/4 "woven wire m2 4,20
 Kawat Wiremesh 1/4 " m2 4,20
 Paku seng kg 4,20
3. Plastering wall work m2 4,20
4. Coating wall work m2 4,20
H Pekerjaan MEP
1. Installation of 5/8 "diameter electrical cable pipe + NYM cable 3 x 2.5 m 30,00
 Pipa Listrik PVC 5/8"" m 36
 Kabel NYM. 3 x 2.5 mm2 (Standar LMK) m 36
 Clamp bh 120
 Junction Box bh 15
2. Outlet installation work bh 2,00
 Stop Kontak Tungggal bh 2
 Isolasi Listrik roll 1
 Clamp bh 16
 Fisher + Skrup bh 12
3. Double switch installation work bh 2,00
 Clamp bh 16
4. Light point installation work bh 5,00
 Fitting Tempel bh 5
 Balon SL 18 watt setara Philips bh 5
I Pekerjaan Lisplank
1. Demolition of old Lisplank m' 32,00
2. Installation of 20 cm GRC kalsiplank m' 60,00
 GRC 20 cm m' 15
 Skrup kg 6
J Pekerjaan Pengecatan
1. Cleaning the surface of the area to be painted m2 105,00
2. Work of painting indoor walls m2 168,00
 Cat Dasar 1 x kg 20,16
 Cat Penutup 2 x Interior kg 30,24
3. Work of painting outdoor walls m2 119,00
 Cat Penutup 2 x Eksterior kg 21,42
4. Work of painting terrace columns m2 9,80

Sidondo Village
Rincian Bahan
1 2 3 4 5 6
5. Work of painting frames, windows, and doors m2 84,00

 Cat Penutup 2 x kg 21,84
 Kuas bh 1,00
 Pengencer ltr 2,52
 Ampelas lbr 17,00
6. Roof painting work m2 252,00
 Cat Dasar kg 30,24
 Cat Penutup kg 45,36
7. Lisplank painting work m2 18,00
 Cat menie kg 3,60
 Plamur kg 2,70
 Kuas bh 1,00
8. Ceiling painting work m2 144,00
 Plamur kg 21,60
 Kuas bh 2,00

RECAPITULATION OF MANPOWERS - RINCIAN TENAGA KERJA
Nama Bangunan : SD NEGERI SIDONDO
Lokasi (Alamat) : Jln. Poros Palu-Kulawi,
Dusun Sidondo 1
Fungsi Bangunan : RUANG KELAS
Jumlah Lantai Bangunan : 1 (satu)
Rincian Tenaga Kerja

No Uraian Pekerjaan Volume Kuantitas
Sat Upah
Pekerjaan Pekerja
1 2 3 4 5 6

1. Pembongkaran kuda-kuda bata m3 2,03
 Pekerja OH 14 Rp 1.350.067,50
 Tukang OH - Rp -
 Kepala Tukang OH - Rp -
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 107.892,00
2. Pemasangan rangka kalsiboard dan penutup kalsiboard 6 mm 120x 240 cm m2 27
 Pekerja OH 6 Rp 540.000,00
 Tukang OH 17 Rp 2.106.000,00
 Kepala Tukang OH 2 Rp 243.000,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 43.200,00
B Pekerjaan Lantai
1. Pembongkaran lantai rabat m2 136,80
 Pekerja OH 23 Rp 2.280.000,00
 Mandor OH 12 Rp 1.824.000,00
2. Pemasangan lantai keramik 40 x 40 cm m2 136,80
 Pekerja OH 35 Rp 3.420.000,00
 Tukang OH 18 Rp 2.223.000,00
 Mandor OH 2 Rp 284.544,00
C Pekerjaan Plafond
1. Pembongkaran plafond rusak / lapuk m2 144,00
 Pekerja OH 12 Rp 1.200.000,00
 Mandor OH 2 Rp 192.000,00
2. Pembongkaran rangka plafon rusak / lapuk m2 144,00
 Pekerja OH 18 Rp 1.800.000,00
 Mandor OH 2 Rp 288.000,00
3. Pemasangan rangka plafon m2 144,00
 Pekerja OH 29 Rp 2.880.000,00
 Tukang OH 44 Rp 5.616.000,00
 Mandor OH 2 Rp 230.400,00
4. Pemasangan penutup plafon tripleks 3 mm m2 144,00
 Pekerja OH 15 Rp 1.440.000,00
 Tukang OH 15 Rp 1.872.000,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 115.200,00
D Pekerjaan Atap
1. Pembongkaran atap berlubang / bocor m2 25,20
 Pekerja OH 5 Rp 420.000,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 67.200,00
2. Pemasangan penutup atap baru m2 25,20
 Pekerja OH 4 Rp 302.400,00
 Tukang OH 2 Rp 196.560,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 24.192,00

1. Pembongkaran dinding partisi dan kusen partisi m2 10,50
 Pekerja OH 1 Rp 70.000,00
1. SDN SIDONDO_ RECAPITULATION OF MANPOWERS Page 1 of 4

Dusun Sidondo 1

Sat Upah
Pekerjaan Pekerja
1 2 3 4 5 6
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 11.200,00
2. Pembongkaran dinding penopang kusen partisi m3 1,58
 Pekerja OH 11 Rp 1.050.052,50
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 83.916,00
3. Perkuatan dengan memasang balok latei 10x15 - Mutu K-200 m3 0,11
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 3.753,75
 Kepala Tukang OH 1 Rp 441,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 1.394,40
4. Pembesian Balok Latei kg 16,91
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 15.389,56
5. Bekisting Balok Latei m2 2,80
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 184.800,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 120.120,00
6. Pemasangan bingkai partisi m3 0,11
 Tukang OH 2 Rp 257.400,00
7. Pemasangan partisi / sekat antar ruang kelas yang baru m2 14,00
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 140.000,00
 Tukang OH 2 Rp 182.000,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 11.200,00
F Pekerjaan Kolom
1. Pengerokan / pembersihan area kolom yang akan diperbaiki m2 1,40
2. Pekerjaan plesteran kolom m2 1,40
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 27.300,00
3. Pekerjaan acian kolom m2 1,40
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 18.200,00

1. Pengerokan plesteran area dinding yang terdapat retakan m2 4,20
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 139.860,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 22.176,00

Dusun Sidondo 1

Sat Upah
Pekerjaan Pekerja
1 2 3 4 5 6
2. Perkuatan dengan menambahkan kawat anyam 1/4 " m2 4,20

 Tukang OH 1 Rp 32.760,00
3. Pekerjaan plesteran dinding m2 4,20
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 126.000,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 81.900,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 10.080,00
4. Pekerjaan acian dinding m2 4,20
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 54.600,00
H Pekerjaan MEP
1. Pemasangan pipa kabel listrik diameter 5/8" + Kabel NYM 3 x 2,5 m 30,00
 Instalator Listrik OH 1 Rp 378.600,00
2. Pek. instalasi stop kontak bh 2,00
3. Pek. instalasi sakelar ganda bh 2,00
4. Pek. Instalasi titik lampu bh 5,00
I Pekerjaan Lisplank
1. Pembongkaran lisplank lama m' 32,00
 Pekerja OH 6 Rp 534.400,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 87.040,00
2. Pemasangan kalsiplank GRC 20 cm m' 60,00
 Pekerja OH 6 Rp 600.000,00
 Tukang OH 12 Rp 1.560.000,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 48.000,00
J Pekerjaan Pengecatan
1. Pembersihan permukaan bidang yang akan dicat m2 105,00
 Pekerja OH 16 Rp 1.575.000,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 50.400,00
2. Pek. Pengecatan dinding dalam m2 168,00
 Pekerja OH 5 Rp 470.400,00
 Tukang OH 8 Rp 917.280,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 80.640,00
3. Pek. Pengecatan dinding luar m2 119,00
 Pekerja OH 4 Rp 333.200,00
 Tukang OH 5 Rp 649.740,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 57.120,00
4. Pek. Pengecatan kolom teras m2 9,80
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 53.508,00

Dusun Sidondo 1

Sat Upah
Pekerjaan Pekerja
1 2 3 4 5 6
5. Pek. Pengecatan kusen, daun jendela, dan daun pintu m2 84,00

 Pekerja OH 6 Rp 588.000,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 98.280,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 40.320,00
6. Pek. Pengecatan atap m2 252,00
 Pekerja OH 8 Rp 705.600,00
 Tukang OH 11 Rp 1.375.920,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 120.960,00
7. Pek. Pengecatan lisplank m2 18,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 98.280,00
8. Pek. Pengecatan plafond m2 144,00
 Pekerja OH 11 Rp 1.008.000,00
 Tukang OH 2 Rp 168.480,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 69.120,00

Building Name : PAKULI ISLAMIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, BUILDING 1
Location (Address) : Poros Palu-Kulawi Street, Pakuli Village
Coordinate : 1,2233 S ; 119,94500 E
A Column work Rp 1.079.223,37

D Work in repairing walls Rp 1.605.620,07
E MEP work Rp 4.655.802,00
F Lisplank work Rp 9.504.239,33
G Painting work Rp 57.646.810,68
(I) The amount of cost Rp 188.350.431,11

( II ) General costs and maximum profits of 25% x I Rp -
( III ) VAT (Value added Tax) 10% x I Rp -
THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF WORK COSTS( I + II + III ) Rp 188.350.431,11

BE ROUNDED Rp 188.350.000,00
Be calculated Seratus Delapan Puluh Delapan Juta Tiga Ratus Lima Puluh Ribu Rupiah
2.1. MIS PAKULI GEDUNG 1 _ RECAPITULATION OF EMPLOYMENT COSTS Page 1 of 4

Coordinate : 1,2233 S ; 119,94500 E
Quantity and Cost
No Description
1 2 3 4 5 6
A Column work
2. Installation of chicken mess m2 4,90 Rp 62.620,00 Rp 306.838,00
TOTAL A Rp 1.079.223,37
B Floor work
TOTAL B Rp 60.587.930,66
C Ceiling work
TOTAL C Rp 53.270.805,00
D Work in repairing walls
TOTAL D Rp 1.605.620,07
E MEP work
1. Installation of 5/8 "diameter electrical cable pipe + NYM cable 3 x 2.5 m 40 Rp 78.821,25 Rp 3.152.850,00
2. Outlet installation work pcs 4 Rp 89.512,50 Rp 358.050,00
3. Double switch installation work pcs 4 Rp 43.225,50 Rp 172.902,00
4. Light point installation work pcs 8 Rp 121.500,00 Rp 972.000,00
TOTAL E Rp 4.655.802,00
F Lisplank work
1. Demolition of old Lisplank m' 110,80 Rp 23.833,33 Rp 2.640.733,33
TOTAL F Rp 9.504.239,33
G Painting work
TOTAL G Rp 57.646.810,68
2.1. MIS PAKULI GEDUNG 1 _ BILL OF QUANTITY (BOQ) Page 2 of 4

Building Name : PAKULI ISLAMIC ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL, BUILDING 1
Lokasi (Alamat) : Poros Palu-Kulawi Street,
Pakuli Village
Luas Bangunan : 285,57 m2
Rincian Bahan
1 2 3 4 5 6
A Pekerjaan Kolom
2. Installation of chicken mess m2 4,9
 Portland Cement (PC) kg 38,10 0,80 Zak
B Pekerjaan Lantai
 Portland Cement (PC) kg 2715 54,30 Zak
C Pekerjaan Plafond
 Paku 7 – 10 cm kg 46
D Pekerjaan Perbaikan Dinding

E Pekerjaan MEP
 Clamp bh 160
2. Outlet installation work pcs 4,00
 Clamp bh 32
3. Double switch installation work pcs 4,00
 Clamp bh 32
2.1. MIS PAKULI GEDUNG 1 _ BILL OF MATERIALS Page 3 of 4

SCHOOL, BUILDING 1
Pakuli Village
Rincian Bahan
1 2 3 4 5 6
4. Light point installation work pcs 8,00

F Pekerjaan Lisplank
1. Demolition of old Lisplank m' 110,80
2. Installation of 20 cm GRC kalsiplank m' 110,80
 GRC 20 cm m' 28
 Skrup kg 11
G Pekerjaan Pengecatan
 Plamur kg 55,76
 Kuas bh 4,00
 Plamur kg 4,99
 Kuas bh 1,00

Nama Bangunan : MIS AL-KHAIRAT PAKULI GEDUNG 1
Lokasi (Alamat) : Jln. Poros Palu-Kulawi, Desa

Pakuli
Luas Bangunan : 285.57 m2
Rincian Pekerja
Sat Upah
Pekerjaan Pekerja
1 2 3 4 5 6
A Pekerjaan Kolom
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 163.170,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 25.872,00
2. Pemasangan kawat wiremesh/kawat anyam 1/4" m2 4,90
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 38.220,00
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 147.000,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 95.550,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 11.760,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 63.700,00
B Pekerjaan Lantai
 Pekerja OH 47 Rp 4.626.234,00
 Mandor OH 23 Rp 3.678.825,60
 Pekerja OH 70 Rp 6.925.500,00
 Tukang OH 35 Rp 4.501.575,00
 Mandor OH 4 Rp 576.201,60
C Pekerjaan Plafond
 Pekerja OH 31 Rp 3.085.110,00
 Mandor OH 3 Rp 475.776,00
 Pekerja OH 24 Rp 2.323.125,00
 Mandor OH 3 Rp 386.568,00
 Pekerja OH 38 Rp 3.717.000,00
 Tukang OH 56 Rp 7.248.150,00
 Mandor OH 2 Rp 297.360,00
 Pekerja OH 38 Rp 3.717.000,00
 Tukang OH 38 Rp 4.832.100,00
 Mandor OH 2 Rp 297.360,00
2.1. MIS PAKULI Ged. 1_ RECAPITULATION OF MANPOWERS Page 1 of 3


Pakuli
Rincian Pekerja
Sat Upah
Pekerjaan Pekerja
1 2 3 4 5 6

 Pekerja OH 3 Rp 242.757,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 38.491,20
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 56.862,00
 Pekerja OH 3 Rp 218.700,00
 Tukang OH 2 Rp 142.155,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 17.496,00
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 145.800,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 94.770,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 11.664,00
E Pekerjaan MEP
1. Pembongkaran lisplank lama m' 110,80
 Pekerja OH 19 Rp 1.850.360,00
 Mandor OH 2 Rp 301.376,00
2. Pemasangan kalsiplank GRC 20 cm m' 110,80
 Pekerja OH 12 Rp 1.108.000,00
 Tukang OH 23 Rp 2.880.800,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 88.640,00
G Pekerjaan Pengecatan
 Pekerja OH 21 Rp 2.088.000,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 66.816,00
 Pekerja OH 13 Rp 1.281.000,00
 Tukang OH 20 Rp 2.497.950,00
 Mandor OH 2 Rp 219.600,00
 Pekerja OH 6 Rp 575.400,00
 Tukang OH 9 Rp 1.122.030,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 98.640,00


Pakuli
Rincian Pekerja
Sat Upah
Pekerjaan Pekerja
1 2 3 4 5 6

 Pekerja OH 6 Rp 510.300,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 85.293,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 34.992,00
5. Pek. Pengecatan Plafond m2 371,70
 Pekerja OH 27 Rp 2.601.900,00
 Tukang OH 4 Rp 434.889,00
 Mandor OH 2 Rp 178.416,00
 Pekerja OH 10 Rp 991.200,00
 Tukang OH 15 Rp 1.932.840,00
 Mandor OH 2 Rp 169.920,00
 Tukang OH 2 Rp 181.490,40
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 15.955,20

Coordinate : 1,22330 S ; 119,94511 E
A Repair of Damaged Foundations Rp 853.792,80

D Roof work Rp 54.042.554,91
E Partition Work Between Classrooms Rp 7.647.077,34
F Column work Rp 1.183.513,91
G Wall Repair Work Rp 6.981.346,51
H MEP work Rp 6.799.058,25
I Doors installation work Rp 10.810.234,40
J Window Frame Work Rp 5.840.123,01
K Painting work Rp 59.675.104,15
L New Toilet Work Rp 23.000.000,00

( III ) VAT (Value Added Tax)10% x I Rp -

BE ROUNDED Rp 309.797.000,00
Be calculated Tiga Ratus Sembilan Juta Tujuh Ratus Sembilan Puluh Tujuh Ribu Rupiah
2.2. MIS PAKULI GEDUNG 2 _ RECAPITULATION OF EMPLOYMENT COSTS Page 1 of 5

Coordinate : 1,22330 S ; 119,94511 E
Quantity and Cost
No Description
1 2 3 4 5 6
A Repair of Damaged Foundations

1. Masonry foundation m3 0,50 Rp 836.525,00 Rp 418.262,50
2. Plastering column work m2 4 Rp 68.148,08 Rp 272.592,30
3. Coating column work m2 4 Rp 40.734,50 Rp 162.938,00
TOTAL A Rp 853.792,80
B Floor work
TOTAL B Rp 67.168.289,32
C Ceiling work
TOTAL C Rp 65.796.787,83
D Roof work
1. Demolition of perforated / leaky roof m2 273,36 Rp 23.833,33 Rp 6.515.156,27
2. Demolition of damaged / weathered ginder m2 136,68 Rp 23.833,33 Rp 3.257.578,13
3. Pekerjaan pemasangan gording baru m2 136,68 Rp 76.535,13 Rp 10.460.943,34
4. Installation of new roof coverings m2 273,36 Rp 123.677,50 Rp 33.808.877,17
TOTAL D Rp 54.042.554,91
E Partition Work Between Classrooms
2. Installation of partition frames m2 0,43 Rp 6.624.875,00 Rp 2.856.977,34
3. Installation of partitions / barriers between new classrooms m2 63,00 Rp 68.500,00 Rp 4.315.500,00
TOTAL E Rp 7.647.077,34
F Column work
TOTAL F Rp 1.183.513,91
G Wall Repair Work
1. Scrape the plastered wall area with cracks m2 23,30 Rp 47.666,67 Rp 1.110.538,00
2. Patch the crack hole with cement paste injection kg 2,00 Rp 618.230,00 Rp 1.236.460,00
3. Reinforcement by adding 1/4 "woven wire m2 23,30 Rp 62.620,00 Rp 1.458.920,76
4. Plaster wall work m2 23,30 Rp 68.148,08 Rp 1.587.713,87
5. Coating column work m2 23,30 Rp 68.148,08 Rp 1.587.713,87
TOTAL G Rp 6.981.346,51
H MEP work
2. Outlet installation work pcs 5,00 Rp 89.512,50 Rp 447.562,50
3. Double switch installation work pcs 5,00 Rp 43.225,50 Rp 216.127,50
4. Light point installation work pcs 13,00 Rp 121.500,00 Rp 1.579.500,00
TOTAL H Rp 6.799.058,25
I Doors installation work
1. Dismantling the old door pcs 6,00 Rp 23.833,33 Rp 143.000,00
2. Installation of new doors Ls 6,00 Rp 1.777.872,40 Rp 10.667.234,40
TOTAL I Rp 10.810.234,40
J Window Frame Work
1. Disassemble the old frame pcs 7,00 Rp 66.500,00 Rp 465.500,00
2. Installing a New Frame (Wooden Beams 5/10) m3 0,48 Rp 6.625.450,00 Rp 3.188.497,81
3. Installing Harmonica Wire m2 26,46 Rp 82.620,00 Rp 2.186.125,20
TOTAL J Rp 5.840.123,01
K Painting work
TOTAL K Rp 59.675.104,15
L New Toilet Work
1. Procurement of 1 New Toilet Unit 2 Cubicles (1.2 m x 1 m) Ls 1,00 Rp 23.000.000,00 Rp 23.000.000,00
TOTAL L Rp 23.000.000,00
2.2. MIS PAKULI GEDUNG 2 _ BILL OF QUANTITY (BOQ) Page 2 of 5

SCHOOL, BUILDING 2
Pakuli Village
Rincian Bahan
1 2 3 4 5 6
A Perbaikan Pondasi yang Rusak

1. Masonry foundation m3 0,50
 Batu Kali / Belah / Gunung m3 1
2. Plastering column work m2 4
3. Coating column work m2 4 9
B Pekerjaan Lantai
 Portland Cement (PC) kg 3044 27 zak
C Pekerjaan Plafond
 Paku 7 – 10 cm kg 78
D Pekerjaan Atap
1. Demolition of perforated / leaky roof m2 273,36
2. Demolition of damaged / weathered ginder m2 136,68
3. Pekerjaan pemasangan gording baru m2 136,68
 Kayu Kelas II (Balok 5/7 Panjang 4 m) m3 1,91
 Paku 5 - 10 cm kg 7,79
4. Installation of new roof coverings m2 273,36
 Atap Bitumen Monolayer (200 x 95 cm, T=3 mm) lbr 191

 Paku kg #REF!
 Lem Kayu kg #REF!
F Pekerjaan Kolom

SCHOOL, BUILDING 2
Pakuli Village
Rincian Bahan
1 2 3 4 5 6


2. Patch the crack hole with cement paste injection kg 2,00
4. Plaster wall work m2 23,30
H Pekerjaan MEP
 Clamp bh 231
 Clamp bh 40
 Clamp bh 40
I Pekerjaan Daun Pintu

1. Dismantling the old door pcs 6,00 Lump Sum
2. Installation of new doors pcs 6,00 Lump Sum
J Pekerjaan Kusen Jendela

1. Disassemble the old frame pcs 7
2. Installing a New Frame (Wooden Beams 5/10) m3 0,48125
 Paku kg 0,6
 Lem Kayu kg 0,481
3. Installing Harmonica Wire m2 26,46
 Kawat Harmonika m3 31,8
K Pekerjaan Pengecatan

SCHOOL, BUILDING 2
Pakuli Village
Rincian Bahan
1 2 3 4 5 6

 Kuas bh 1,16
 Plamur kg 13,89
 Kuas bh 0,93
 Plamur kg 46,60
 Kuas bh 3,11
L Pengadaan 1 Unit Toilet Baru 4 Bilik Ls 1 Lump Sum

Nama Bangunan :
MIS AL-KHAIRAAT PAKULI Gedung 2
Pakuli

Sat Upah
Pekerjaan Pekerja
1 2 3 4 5 6
A Perbaikan Pondasi yang Rusak

1. Pasangan batu pondasi m3 0,50
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 48.750,00
2. Pekerjaan plesteran m2 4
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 120.000,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 78.000,00
3. Pekerjaan Acian m2 4 9
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 52.000,00
B Pekerjaan Lantai
 Pekerja OH 52 Rp 5.187.688,00
 Mandor OH 26 Rp 4.125.299,20
 Pekerja OH 78 Rp 7.766.000,00
 Tukang OH 39 Rp 5.047.900,00
 Mandor OH 5 Rp 646.131,20
C Pekerjaan Plafond
 Pekerja OH 26 Rp 2.578.312,00
 Mandor OH 3 Rp 397.619,20
 Pekerja OH 39 Rp 3.883.000,00
 Mandor OH 5 Rp 646.131,20
 Pekerja OH 63 Rp 6.212.800,00
 Tukang OH 94 Rp 12.114.960,00
 Kepala Tukang OH 10 Rp 1.397.880,00
 Mandor OH 4 Rp 497.024,00
 Pekerja OH 32 Rp 3.106.400,00
 Tukang OH 32 Rp 4.038.320,00
 Mandor OH 2 Rp 248.512,00
D Pekerjaan Atap
1. Pembongkaran atap berlubang / bocor m2 273,36
 Pekerja OH 46 Rp 4.556.053,33
 Mandor OH 5 Rp 728.968,53

Nama Bangunan :
Pakuli

Sat Upah
Pekerjaan Pekerja
1 2 3 4 5 6
2. Pembongkaran gording rusak/lapuk m2 136,68

 Pekerja OH 23 Rp 2.278.026,67
 Mandor OH 3 Rp 364.484,27
3. Pekerjaan pemasangan gording baru m2 136,68
 Pekerja OH 17 Rp 1.640.179,20
 Tukang OH 17 Rp 2.132.232,96
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 131.214,34
4. Pemasangan penutup atap baru m2 273,36
 Pekerja OH 33 Rp 3.280.358,40
 Tukang OH 17 Rp 2.132.232,96
 Mandor OH 2 Rp 262.428,67

 Pekerja OH 5 Rp 420.000,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 67.200,00
 Pekerja OH 3 Rp 258.750,00
 Tukang OH 8 Rp 1.009.125,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 20.700,00
 Pekerja OH 7 Rp 630.000,00
 Tukang OH 7 Rp 819.000,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 50.400,00
F Pekerjaan Kolom
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 179.820,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 28.512,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 42.120,00
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 162.000,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 105.300,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 12.960,00
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 108.000,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 70.200,00

Nama Bangunan :
Pakuli

Sat Upah
Pekerjaan Pekerja
1 2 3 4 5 6

 Pekerja OH 8 Rp 775.823,40
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 123.013,44
2. Menambal lubang retakan dengan injeksi pasta semen kg 2,00
 Pekerja OH 4 Rp 330.000,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 71.500,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 26.560,00
 Tukang OH 2 Rp 181.724,40
 Pekerja OH 7 Rp 698.940,00
 Tukang OH 4 Rp 454.311,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 55.915,20
 Pekerja OH 5 Rp 465.960,00
 Tukang OH 3 Rp 302.874,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 37.276,80
H Pekerjaan MEP
I Pekerjaan Daun Pintu
1. Membongkar pintu lama Upah sudah termasuk harga borongan

bh 6,00 yang di dalamnya include harga
pembongkaran pintu lama, pembuatan dan
2. Memasang daun pintu baru
bh 6,00 pemasangan pintu baru
J Pekerjaan Kusen Jendela

1. Membongkar Kusen Lama bh 7
 Pekerja OH 4 Rp 350.000,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 56.000,00
2. Memasang Kusen Baru (Kayu Balok 5/10) m3 0,48125
 Pekerja OH 3 Rp 288.750,00
 Tukang OH 9 Rp 1.126.125,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 23.100,00
3. Memasang Kawat Harmonika m2 26,46
 Tukang OH 2 Rp 206.388,00

Nama Bangunan :
Pakuli

Sat Upah
Pekerjaan Pekerja
1 2 3 4 5 6
K Pekerjaan Pengecatan
 Pekerja OH 51 Rp 5.067.000,00
 Mandor OH 2 Rp 162.144,00
 Pekerja OH 11 Rp 1.017.954,00
 Tukang OH 16 Rp 1.985.010,30
 Mandor OH 2 Rp 174.506,40
 Pekerja OH 6 Rp 547.554,00
 Tukang OH 9 Rp 1.067.730,30
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 93.866,40
 Pekerja OH 9 Rp 815.430,00
 Tukang OH 2 Rp 136.293,30
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 55.915,20
 Pekerja OH 10 Rp 956.771,20
 Tukang OH 15 Rp 1.865.703,84
 Mandor OH 2 Rp 164.017,92
 Pekerja OH 3 Rp 259.308,00
 Tukang OH 4 Rp 505.650,60
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 44.452,80
 Pekerja OH 22 Rp 2.174.480,00
 Tukang OH 3 Rp 363.448,80
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 149.107,20
L Pengadaan 1 Unit Toilet Baru 4 Bilik Ls 1 UPAH BORONGAN

Building Name : INPRES LAMBARA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL,
BUILDING 1
Location (Address) : Poros Palu-Kulawi Street, Lambara Village

Coordinate : 1,16603 S ; 119,92993 E
B Pekerjaan Lantai Rp 54.722.042,64

C Pekerjaan Plafond Rp 2.678.521,31
F Pekerjaan Kolom Rp 1.042.210,61
G Pekerjaan Perbaikan Dinding Rp 9.633.577,85
H Pekerjaan MEP Rp 5.822.356,50
K Pekerjaan Pengecatan Rp 61.816.113,37


BE ROUNDED Rp 135.714.000,00
Be calculated Seratus Tiga Puluh Lima Juta Tujuh Ratus Empat Belas Ribu Rupiah
3.1. SD INPRES LAMBARA GEDUNG 1 _ RECAPITULATION OF EMPLOYMENT COSTS Page 1 of 4

Building Name : INPRES LAMBARA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, BUILDING 1
Coordinate : 1,16603 S ; 119,92993 E
Quantity and Cost
No Description
1 2 3 4 5 6
A Floor work
JUMLAH A Rp 54.722.042,64
B Ceiling work
1. Demolition of damaged / weathered ceiling m2 12,51 Rp 19.416,67 Rp 242.902,50
2. Demolition of the damaged / weathered ceiling frame m2 12,51 Rp 29.125,00 Rp 364.353,75
4. Installation of 3 mm plywood ceiling cover m2 12,51 Rp 53.106,25 Rp 664.359,19
JUMLAH B Rp 2.678.521,31
C Column work
2. Patch the crack hole with cement paste injection kg 1,00 Rp 618.230,00 Rp 618.230,00
JUMLAH C Rp 1.042.210,61
D Wall Repair Work
3. Reinforcement by adding 1/4 "woven wire m2 35,32 Rp 62.620,00 Rp 2.211.644,47
4. Plastering wall work m2 35,32 Rp 68.988,00 Rp 2.436.552,68
5. Coating column work m2 35,32 Rp 40.975,00 Rp 1.447.175,54
JUMLAH D Rp 9.633.577,85
E MEP work
2. Outlet installation work bh 4,00 Rp 89.512,50 Rp 358.050,00
3. Double switch installation work bh 4,00 Rp 43.225,50 Rp 172.902,00
4. Light point installation work bh 8,00 Rp 121.500,00 Rp 972.000,00
JUMLAH E Rp 5.822.356,50
F Painting work
JUMLAH F Rp 61.816.113,37
3.1. SD INPRES LAMBARA GEDUNG 1 _ BILL OF QUANTITY (BOQ) Page 2 of 4

Building Name : INPRES LAMBARA ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL, BUILDING 1
Lambara Village
Jumlah Lantai Bangunan : 1 (ONE)
Rincian Bahan
1 2 3 4 5 6
A Pekerjaan Lantai
B Pekerjaan Plafond
 Kaso-kaso 5 x 7 cm m3 0,20
 Paku 7 – 10 cm kg 3
 Paku Tripleks kg 0,375
C Pekerjaan Kolom

E Pekerjaan MEP
 Clamp bh 219
2. Outlet installation work bh 4,00
 Clamp bh 32
3.1. SD INPRES LAMBARA GEDUNG 1 _ BILL OF MATERIALS Page 3 of 4

SCHOOL, BUILDING 1
Lambara Village
Jumlah Lantai Bangunan : 1 (ONE)
Rincian Bahan
1 2 3 4 5 6
3. Double switch installation work bh 4,00

 Clamp bh 32
F Pekerjaan Pengecatan
 Kuas bh 1,00
 Plamur kg 16,56
 Kuas bh 2,00
 Plamur kg 45,04
 Kuas bh 3,00

Nama Bangunan : SD INPRES LAMBARA Ged. 1
Lambara
Rincian Pekerja
Sat Upah
Pekerjaan Pekerja
1 2 3 4 5 6
A Pekerjaan Lantai
 Pekerja OH 42 Rp 4.178.340,00
 Mandor OH 21 Rp 3.322.656,00
 Pekerja OH 63 Rp 6.255.000,00
 Tukang OH 32 Rp 4.065.750,00
 Mandor OH 4 Rp 520.416,00
B Pekerjaan Plafond
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 103.833,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 16.012,80
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 156.375,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 26.020,80
 Pekerja OH 3 Rp 250.200,00
 Tukang OH 4 Rp 487.890,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 20.016,00
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 125.100,00
 Tukang OH 2 Rp 162.630,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 10.008,00
C Pekerjaan Kolom
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 10.164,00
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 165.000,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 35.750,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 13.280,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 15.015,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 616,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 37.537,50
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 25.025,00
3.1. SD INPRES LAMBARA Ged. 1_ RECAPITULATION OF MANPOWERS Page 1 of 3

Lambara
Rincian Pekerja
Sat Upah
Pekerjaan Pekerja
1 2 3 4 5 6

 Pekerja OH 12 Rp 1.176.106,05
 Mandor OH 2 Rp 186.481,68
 Pekerja OH 5 Rp 495.000,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 107.250,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 39.840,00
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 127.146,60
 Tukang OH 3 Rp 275.484,30
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 11.301,92
 Pekerja OH 11 Rp 1.059.555,00
 Tukang OH 6 Rp 688.710,75
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 84.764,40
 Pekerja OH 8 Rp 706.370,00
 Tukang OH 4 Rp 459.140,50
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 56.509,60
E Pekerjaan MEP
 Pekerja OH 1 Rp 480.000,00
F Pekerjaan Pengecatan
 Pekerja OH 83 Rp 8.245.650,00
 Mandor OH 2 Rp 263.860,80
 Pekerja OH 10 Rp 975.394,00
 Tukang OH 15 Rp 1.902.018,30
 Mandor OH 2 Rp 167.210,40
 Pekerja OH 6 Rp 563.794,00
 Tukang OH 9 Rp 1.099.398,30
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 96.650,40
 Pekerja OH 5 Rp 442.715,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 73.996,65
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 30.357,60

Lambara
Rincian Pekerja
Sat Upah
Pekerjaan Pekerja
1 2 3 4 5 6

 Pekerja OH 27 Rp 2.627.100,00
 Tukang OH 4 Rp 439.101,00
 Mandor OH 2 Rp 180.144,00
 Pekerja OH 4 Rp 309.120,00
 Tukang OH 5 Rp 602.784,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 52.992,00
 Pekerja OH 9 Rp 840.672,00
 Tukang OH 13 Rp 1.639.310,40
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 144.115,20

Building Name : INPRES LAMBARA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL,
BUILDING 2
Coordinate : 1,1656 S ; 119,9297 E
A Floor work Rp 51.178.888,80

B Partition Work between Classrooms Rp 3.925.485,30
E MEP work Rp 3.631.719,75
F Frame, door, and Window work Rp 7.641.082,94
G Lisplank work Rp 8.234.720,00
H Painting work Rp 50.082.440,20


BE ROUNDED Rp 164.185.000,00
Be calculated One Hundred Sixty Four Million One Hundred Eighty Five Thousand Rupiah
3.2. SD INPRES LAMBARA GEDUNG 2 _ RECAPITULATION OF EMPLOYMENT COSTS Page 1 of 5

Building Name : INPRES LAMBARA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, BUILDING 2
Coordinate : 1,1656 S ; 119,9297 E
Building Area : 234 m2
Quantity and Cost
No Description
1 2 3 4 5 6
A Floor work
TOTAL Rp 51.178.888,80
B Partition Work between Classrooms
TOTAL Rp 3.925.485,30
C Ceiling work
TOTAL Rp 35.419.743,33
TOTAL Rp 4.071.073,21
E MEP work
2. Outlet installation work pcs 2 Rp 89.512,50 Rp 179.025,00
3. Double switch installation work pcs 2 Rp 43.225,50 Rp 86.451,00
4. Light point installation work pcs 5 Rp 121.500,00 Rp 607.500,00
TOTAL Rp 3.631.719,75
F Frame, door, and Window work
1. Disassembly of the window, door, and frame m3 0,69 Rp 66.500,00 Rp 46.034,63
2. Manufacture and installation of window, door, and frame m3 0,69 Rp 6.625.450,00 Rp 4.586.467,76
3. manufacture and installation of panel doors pcs 1,00 Rp 1.777.872,40 Rp 1.777.872,40
4. Manufacture and installation of window glass m2 2,42 Rp 509.610,00 Rp 1.230.708,15
TOTAL Rp 7.641.082,94
G Lisplank work
TOTAL Rp 8.234.720,00
H Painting work
4. Work of painting terrace columns m2 19,60 Rp 30.044,80 Rp 588.878,08
TOTAL H Rp 50.082.440,20
3.2. SD INPRES LAMBARA GEDUNG 2 _ BILL OF QUANTITY (BOQ) Page 2 of 5

SCHOOL, BUILDING 2
Lambara Village
Luas Bangunan : 234 m2
Rincian Bahan
1 2 3 4 5 6
A Pekerjaan Lantai
B Pekerjaan Partisi / Sekat Antar Ruang Kelas

 Air ltr 23
 Paku biasa 2" - 5" kg 1,12
 Paku kg 0,09
C Pekerjaan Plafond
1. Demolition of damaged / weathered ceiling m2 308
 Paku 7 – 10 cm kg 23


SCHOOL, BUILDING 2
Lambara Village
Rincian Bahan
1 2 3 4 5 6
E Pekerjaan MEP
 Clamp bh 140
 Clamp bh 16
 Clamp bh 16
F Pekerjaan Kusen, Pintu, dan Jendela

1. Disassembly of the window, door, and frame m3 0,692
2. Manufacture and installation of window, door, and frame m3 0,692
 Paku kg 0,87
3. manufacture and installation of panel doors unit 1
 Daun Pintu Panil Ls 1,00 Lump Sum
 Engsel Pintu bh 3,00
 Kunci Pintu Tanam bh 1,00
4. Manufacture and installation of window glass m2 2,415
 Papan Kayu Kelas II m3 0,06
G Pekerjaan Lisplank
1. Demolition of old Lisplank m' 96
2. Installation of 20 cm GRC kalsiplank m' 96
 GRC 20 cm lbr 24
 Skrup kg 10
H Pekerjaan Pengecatan
4. Work of painting terrace columns m2 19,60
 Kuas bh 1,29

SCHOOL, BUILDING 2
Lambara Village
Rincian Bahan
1 2 3 4 5 6

6. Roof painting work m2 280
 Plamur kg 4,32
 Kuas bh 1,00
8. Ceiling painting work m2 308
 Plamur kg 46,20
 Kuas bh 3,00

Lambara
Rincian Pekerja
Sat Upah
Pekerjaan Pekerja
1 2 3 4 5 6
A Pekerjaan Lantai
 Pekerja OH 40 Rp 3.907.800,00
 Mandor OH 20 Rp 3.107.520,00
 Pekerja OH 59 Rp 5.850.000,00
 Tukang OH 30 Rp 3.802.500,00
 Mandor OH 4 Rp 486.720,00

 Mandor OH 1 Rp 11.760,00
 Pekerja OH 11 Rp 1.050.052,50
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 83.916,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 15.389,56
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 184.800,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 120.120,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 14.784,00
 Tukang OH 2 Rp 175.500,00
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 140.000,00
 Tukang OH 2 Rp 182.000,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 11.200,00
C Pekerjaan Plafond
1. Pembongkaran plafond rusak / lapuk m2 308
 Pekerja OH 26 Rp 2.556.400,00
 Mandor OH 3 Rp 394.240,00
 Pekerja OH 12 Rp 1.155.000,00
 Mandor OH 2 Rp 192.192,00

Lambara
Rincian Pekerja
Sat Upah
Pekerjaan Pekerja
1 2 3 4 5 6

 Pekerja OH 19 Rp 1.848.000,00
 Tukang OH 28 Rp 3.603.600,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 147.840,00
 Pekerja OH 31 Rp 3.080.000,00
 Tukang OH 31 Rp 4.004.000,00
 Mandor OH 2 Rp 246.400,00

 Pekerja OH 5 Rp 428.571,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 67.953,60
2. Menambal lubang retakan dengan injeksi pasta semen kg 2
 Pekerja OH 4 Rp 330.000,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 71.500,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 26.560,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 100.386,00
 Pekerja OH 4 Rp 386.100,00
 Tukang OH 2 Rp 250.965,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 30.888,00
 Pekerja OH 3 Rp 257.400,00
 Tukang OH 2 Rp 167.310,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 20.592,00
E Pekerjaan MEP
F Pekerjaan Kusen, Pintu, dan Jendela

1. Pembongkaran kusen pintu jendela m3 0,692
2. Pembuatan dan pemasangan kusen pintu jendela m3 0,692
 Pekerja OH 5 Rp 415.350,00
 Tukang OH 13 Rp 1.619.865,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 33.228,00

Lambara
Rincian Pekerja
Sat Upah
Pekerjaan Pekerja
1 2 3 4 5 6
3. Pembuatan dan pemasangan daun pintu panil unit 1

 Pekerja OH 1 Rp 100.000,00
 Tukang OH 3 Rp 390.000,00
4. Pembuatan dan pemasangan jendela kaca m2 2,415
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 193.200,00
 Tukang OH 6 Rp 753.480,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 15.456,00
G Pekerjaan Lisplank
1. Pembongkaran lisplank lama m' 96
 Pekerja OH 17 Rp 1.603.200,00
 Mandor OH 2 Rp 261.120,00
2. Pemasangan kalsiplank GRC 20 cm m' 96
 Pekerja OH 10 Rp 960.000,00
 Tukang OH 20 Rp 2.496.000,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 76.800,00
 Pekerja OH 20 Rp 1.980.000,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 63.360,00
 Pekerja OH 9 Rp 817.740,00
 Tukang OH 13 Rp 1.594.593,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 140.184,00
 Pekerja OH 6 Rp 559.020,00
 Tukang OH 9 Rp 1.090.089,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 95.832,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 107.016,00
 Pekerja OH 10 Rp 900.900,00
 Tukang OH 2 Rp 150.579,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 61.776,00
6. Pek. Pengecatan atap m2 280
 Pekerja OH 20 Rp 1.960.000,00
 Tukang OH 3 Rp 327.600,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 134.400,00
 Tukang OH 2 Rp 157.248,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 13.824,00

Lambara
Rincian Pekerja
Sat Upah
Pekerjaan Pekerja
1 2 3 4 5 6
8. Pek. Pengecatan Plafond m2 308

 Pekerja OH 9 Rp 862.400,00
 Tukang OH 13 Rp 1.681.680,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 147.840,00

Building Name : INPRES 1 KALUKU TINGGU ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Location (Address) : Tandalonggo Street, Pewunu Village
Coordinate : 1,0261 S ; 119,8600 E
A Column work Rp 2.084.385,87

B Partition Work between Classrooms Rp 3.920.007,95
E MEP work Rp 4.534.302,00
F Foundation work Rp 872.692,73
G Frame, door, and Window work Rp 817.200,00


BE ROUNDED Rp 67.534.000,00
Be calculated Sixty Seven Million Five Hundred Thirty Four Thousand Rupiah
4. SD INPRES 1 KALUKU TINGGU _ RECAPITULATION OF EMPLOYMENT COSTS Page 1 of 5

Building Name : INPRES 1 KALUKU TINGGU ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
Location (Address) : Tandalonggo Street, Pewunu Village
Coordinate : 1,0261 S ; 119,8600 E
Quantity and Cost
No Description
1 2 3 4 5 6
A Column work
TOTAL A Rp 2.084.385,87
B Partition Work between Classrooms
TOTAL B Rp 3.920.007,95
C Ceiling work
TOTAL C Rp 9.423.858,59
TOTAL D Rp 1.729.331,69
E MEP work
2. Outlet installation work bh 4 Rp 89.512,50 Rp 358.050,00
3. Double switch installation work bh 4 Rp 43.225,50 Rp 172.902,00
4. Light point installation work bh 7 Rp 121.500,00 Rp 850.500,00
TOTAL E Rp 4.534.302,00
F Foundation work
1. Scrape the plastered foundation area where there are cracks m2 3,00 Rp 47.666,67 Rp 143.000,00
TOTAL F Rp 872.692,73
G Frame, door, and Window work
1. Installation of planting door locks bh 4,00 Rp 204.300,00 Rp 817.200,00
TOTAL G Rp 817.200,00
H Painting work
5. Old plafond painting work m2 250,64 Rp 45.507,00 Rp 11.405.646,95
6. New plafond painting work m2 83,55 Rp 60.367,00 Rp 5.043.361,02
TOTAL H Rp 44.153.024,52
4. SD INPRES 1 KALUKU TINGGU _ BILL OF QUANTITY (BOQ) Page 2 of 5

Building Name : INPRES 1 KALUKU TINGGU
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Lokasi (Alamat) : Tandalonggo Street, Pewunu
Village
Rincian Bahan
1 2 3 4 5 6
A Pekerjaan Kolom
 Sika Injeksi / SIKA Sikadur-52 kg 0,50

 Portland Cement (PC) kg 37 0,75 zak
 Air ltr 23
 Paku biasa 2" - 5" kg 1,1
 Paku kg 3,5
 Lem Kayu kg 2,8
C Pekerjaan Plafond
 Paku 7 – 10 cm kg 6

4. SD INPRES 1 KALUKU TINGGU _ BILL OF MATERIALS Page 3 of 5

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Village
Rincian Bahan
1 2 3 4 5 6

E Pekerjaan MEP
1. Installation of 5/8 "diameter electrical cable pipe + NYM cable 3 x 2.5 m 40
 Clamp bh 160
2. Outlet installation work bh 4
 Clamp bh 32
 Clamp bh 12
F Pekerjaan Pondasi
1. Scrape the plastered foundation area where there are cracks m2 3
4. Plastering wall work m2 3
G Pekerjaan Pintu
1. Installation of planting door locks bh 4
 Kunci pintu tanam bh 4
2. Work of painting indoor walls m2 276
3. Work of painting outdoor walls m2 192

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Village
Rincian Bahan
1 2 3 4 5 6

 Kuas bh 1
5. Old plafond painting work m2 250,635
 Kuas bh 3
6. New plafond painting work m2 83,545
 Plamur kg 12,53
 Kuas bh 1
7. Roof painting work m2 308
 Plamur kg 4,57
 Kuas bh 2,00

Nama Bangunan : SD INPRES 1 KALUKU TINGGU
Lokasi (Alamat) : Jln. Tandalonggo, Desa
Pewunu
Rincian Bahan
Sat Upah
Pekerjaan Pekerja
1 2 3 4 5 6
A Pekerjaan Kolom
 Pekerja OH 3 Rp 269.730,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 42.768,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 17.875,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 63.180,00
 Pekerja OH 3 Rp 243.000,00
 Tukang OH 2 Rp 157.950,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 19.440,00
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 162.000,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 105.300,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 12.960,00

 Mandor OH 1 Rp 11.760,00
 Pekerja OH 11 Rp 1.050.052,50
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 83.916,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 15.389,56
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 184.800,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 120.120,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 14.784,00
 Tukang OH 2 Rp 175.500,00
4. SD INPRES 1 KALUKU TINGGU_ RECAPITULATION OF MANPOWERS Page 1 of 4

Pewunu
Rincian Bahan
Sat Upah
Pekerjaan Pekerja
1 2 3 4 5 6

 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 140.000,00
 Tukang OH 2 Rp 182.000,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 11.200,00
C Pekerjaan Plafond
 Pekerja OH 7 Rp 693.423,50
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 106.937,60
 Pekerja OH 4 Rp 313.293,75
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 52.132,08
 Pekerja OH 6 Rp 501.270,00
 Tukang OH 8 Rp 977.476,50
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 40.101,60
 Pekerja OH 9 Rp 835.450,00
 Tukang OH 9 Rp 1.086.085,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 66.836,00

 Pekerja OH 3 Rp 215.784,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 34.214,40
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 17.875,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 50.544,00
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 194.400,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 126.360,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 15.552,00
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 129.600,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 84.240,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 10.368,00
E Pekerjaan MEP
1. Pemasangan pipa kabel listrik diameter 5/8" + Kabel NYM 3 x 2,5 m 40
2. Pek. instalasi stop kontak bh 4

Pewunu
Rincian Bahan
Sat Upah
Pekerjaan Pekerja
1 2 3 4 5 6

F Pekerjaan Pondasi
1. Pengerokan plesteran area pondasi yang terdapat retakan m2 3
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 15.840,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 17.875,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 11.700,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 480,00
4. Pekerjaan plesteran dinding m2 3
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 58.500,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 39.000,00
G Pekerjaan Pintu
1. Pemasangan kunci pintu tanam bh 4
 Tukang OH 2 Rp 260.000,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 32.000,00
 Pekerja OH 20 Rp 1.926.000,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 61.632,00
2. Pek. Pengecatan dinding dalam m2 276
 Pekerja OH 8 Rp 772.800,00
 Tukang OH 12 Rp 1.506.960,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 132.480,00
3. Pek. Pengecatan dinding luar m2 192
 Pekerja OH 6 Rp 537.600,00
 Tukang OH 9 Rp 1.048.320,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 92.160,00
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 181.440,00
 Tukang OH 3 Rp 353.808,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 31.104,00

Pewunu
Rincian Bahan
Sat Upah
Pekerjaan Pekerja
1 2 3 4 5 6
5. Pek. Pengecatan plafond lama m2 250,635

 Pekerja OH 18 Rp 1.754.445,00
 Tukang OH 3 Rp 293.242,95
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 120.304,80
6. Pek. Pengecatan plafond baru m2 83,545
 Pekerja OH 6 Rp 584.815,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 97.747,65
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 40.101,60
7. Pek. Pengecatan atap m2 308
 Pekerja OH 9 Rp 862.400,00
 Tukang OH 13 Rp 1.681.680,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 147.840,00
 Tukang OH 2 Rp 166.420,80
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 14.630,40

Building Name : INPRES PANDERE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, BUILDING 1
Coordinate : 1,19701 S ; 119,94274 E
A Ceiling work Rp 1.010.992,50

B Column work Rp 1.156.310,75
C Work in repairing walls Rp 2.813.689,49
D Work in repairing foundation Rp 662.044,60
E MEP work Rp 5.153.634,00
F Lisplank work Rp 12.625.031,25
G Partition Work between Classrooms Rp 2.591.616,17


Be calculated Seventy Million Three Hundred Seventy Nine Thousand Rupiah
5.1. SD INPRES PANDERE GEDUNG 1 _ RECAPITULATION OF EMPLOYMENT COSTS Page 1 of 4

Building Name : INPRES PANDERE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL,
BUILDING 1
Coordinate : 1,19701 S ; 119,94274 E
Quantity and Cost
No Description
1 2 3 4 5 6
A Ceiling work
3. Installation of ceiling frames m2 4,73 Rp 112.318,75 Rp 530.706,09
4. Installation of 3 mm plywood ceiling cover m2 4,73 Rp 53.106,25 Rp 250.927,03
TOTAL A Rp 1.010.992,50
B Column work
TOTAL B Rp 1.156.310,75
C Work in repairing walls
TOTAL C Rp 2.813.689,49
D Work in repairing foundation
1. Cleaning of peeling plastered masonry m2 4,20 Rp 47.666,67 Rp 200.200,00
2. Plastering work m2 4,20 Rp 68.988,00 Rp 289.749,60
3. Coating work m2 4,20 Rp 40.975,00 Rp 172.095,00
TOTAL D Rp 662.044,60
E MEP work
2. Outlet installation work pcs 3,00 Rp 89.512,50 Rp 268.537,50
3. Double switch installation work pcs 3,00 Rp 43.225,50 Rp 129.676,50
4. Light point installation work pcs 8,00 Rp 121.500,00 Rp 972.000,00
TOTAL E Rp 5.153.634,00
F Lisplank work
TOTAL F Rp 12.625.031,25
G Partition Work between Classrooms
3. Installation of partitions / barriers between new classrooms m2 24,50 Rp 68.500,00 Rp 1.678.250,00
TOTAL G Rp 2.591.616,17
H Painting work
6. Lisplank painting work m2 15,00 Rp 60.367,00 Rp 905.505,00
TOTAL H Rp 44.365.827,15
5.1. SD INPRES PANDERE GEDUNG 1 _ BILL OF QUANTITY (BOQ)

Building Name : INPRES PANDERE ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL, BUILDING 1
Lambara Village
Rincian Bahan
1 2 3 4 5 6
A Pekerjaan Plafond
 Paku 7 – 10 cm kg 1

 Paku kg 0,1
 Lem Kayu kg 0,1
C Pekerjaan Kolom

D Pekerjaan MEP
 Clamp bh 192
 Clamp bh 24
5.1. SD INPRES PANDERE GEDUNG 1 _ BILL OF MATERIALS Page 3 of 4

SCHOOL, BUILDING 1
Lambara Village
Rincian Bahan
1 2 3 4 5 6

 Clamp bh 24
1. Demolition of old Lisplank m' 75
2. Installation of 20 cm GRC kalsiplank m' 75
 GRC 20 cm m' 19
 Skrup kg 8
G Pekerjaan Perbaikan Pondasi

1. Cleaning of peeling plastered masonry m2 4,2
2. Plastering work m2 4,2
3. Coating work m2 4,2
 Kuas bh 0,23
 Plamur kg 2,25
 Kuas bh 0,15
7. Ceiling painting work m2 189
 Plamur kg 28,35
 Kuas bh 1,89

Nama Bangunan :
SD INPRES PANDERE Ged. 1
Pandere
Rincian Pekerja
Sat Upah
Pekerjaan Pekerja
1 2 3 4 5 6
A Pekerjaan Plafond
 Pekerja OH 1 Rp 151.200,00
 Tukang OH 2 Rp 212.625,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 70.875,00

 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 261.333,33
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 16.333,33
 Pekerja OH 1 Rp 105.600,00
 Tukang OH 2 Rp 297.000,00
 Pekerja OH 3 Rp 392.000,00
 Tukang OH 3 Rp 367.500,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 12.250,00
C Pekerjaan Kolom
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 279.720,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 17.325,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 47.250,00
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 252.000,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 118.125,00
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 168.000,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 78.750,00
5.1. SD INPRES PANDERE Ged. 1_ RECAPITULATION OF MANPOWERS Page 1 of 3

Nama Bangunan :
Pandere
Rincian Pekerja
Sat Upah
Pekerjaan Pekerja
1 2 3 4 5 6

 Pekerja OH 5 Rp 680.652,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 42.157,50
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 114.975,00
 Pekerja OH 4 Rp 613.200,00
 Tukang OH 2 Rp 287.437,50
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 19.162,50
 Pekerja OH 3 Rp 408.800,00
 Tukang OH 2 Rp 191.625,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 12.775,00
E Pekerjaan MEP
1. Pembongkaran lisplank lama m' 75
 Pekerja OH 13 Rp 2.004.000,00
 Mandor OH 2 Rp 127.500,00
2. Pemasangan kalsiplank GRC 20 cm m' 75
 Pekerja OH 8 Rp 1.200.000,00
 Tukang OH 15 Rp 2.250.000,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 37.500,00
G Pekerjaan Perbaikan Pondasi

1. Pembersihan plesteran pasangan batu yang terkelupas m2 4,2
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 223.776,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 13.860,00
2. Pekerjaan plesteran m2 4,2
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 201.600,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 94.500,00

Nama Bangunan :
Pandere
Rincian Pekerja
Sat Upah
Pekerjaan Pekerja
1 2 3 4 5 6
3. Pekerjaan acian m2 4,2

 Pekerja OH 1 Rp 134.400,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 63.000,00
 Pekerja OH 81 Rp 12.852.000,00
 Mandor OH 2 Rp 160.650,00
 Pekerja OH 10 Rp 1.528.800,00
 Tukang OH 15 Rp 2.149.875,00
 Mandor OH 2 Rp 102.375,00
 Pekerja OH 6 Rp 870.240,00
 Tukang OH 9 Rp 1.223.775,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 58.275,00
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 254.800,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 30.712,50
 Pekerja OH 20 Rp 3.175.200,00
 Tukang OH 3 Rp 382.725,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 85.050,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 94.500,00
7. Pek. Pengecatan plafond m2 189
 Pekerja OH 14 Rp 2.116.800,00
 Tukang OH 2 Rp 255.150,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 56.700,00

Building Name : INPRES PANDERE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, BUILDING 2

Coordinate : 1,1967 S ; 119,9425 E
A Ceiling work Rp 5.174.962,50

B Work in repairing walls Rp 5.466.279,31
C Foundation work Rp 659.079,00
D Painting work Rp 37.377.206,52


Be calculated Forty-Eight Million Six Hundred Seventy Seven Thousand Rupiah
5.2. SD INPRES PANDERE GEDUNG 2 _ RECAPITULATION OF EMPLOYMENT COSTS Page 1 of 4

Building Name : INPRES PANDERE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL,
BUILDING 2
Coordinate : 1,1967 S ; 119,9425 E
Quantity and Cost
No Description
1 2 3 4 5 6
A Ceiling work
JUMLAH A Rp 5.174.962,50
B Work in repairing walls
3. Trasram's work m2 18,55 Rp 144.325,00 Rp 2.677.228,75
5. Coating wall work m2 23,75 Rp 40.975,00 Rp 973.053,81
JUMLAH B Rp 5.466.279,31
C Foundation work
1. Scrape the plastered foundation area where there are cracks m2 3,00 Rp 47.666,67 Rp 143.000,00
3. Plastering work m2 3,00 Rp 68.988,00 Rp 206.964,00
JUMLAH C Rp 659.079,00
D Painting work
4. Pek. Pengecatan kolom teras m2 17,15 Rp 30.044,80 Rp 515.268,32
6. New ceiling painting work m2 225,00 Rp 45.507,00 Rp 10.239.075,00
7. Old ceiling painting work m2 45,00 Rp 60.367,00 Rp 2.716.515,00
JUMLAH D Rp 37.377.206,52
5.2. SD INPRES PANDERE GEDUNG 2 _ BILL OF QUANTITY (BOQ) Page 2 of 4

SCHOOL, BUILDING 2
Lambara Village
Rincian Bahan
1 2 3 4 5 6

2. Demolition of the damaged / weathered ceiling frame m2 14
3. Installation of ceiling frames m2 14 30
 Kaso-kaso 5 x 7 cm m3 0,22
 Paku 7 – 10 cm kg 3
4. Installation of 3 mm plywood ceiling cover m2 45 108
 Paku Tripleks kg 0,41
B Pekerjaan Perbaikan Dinding

3. Trasram's work m2 18,55
 Trasram Siap Pakai merk Mortar Utama MU-101 kg 371,00 1 Zak @ 40 kg
 Air ltr 64,93
5. Coating wall work m2 23,75
C Pekerjaan Pondasi
1. Scrape the plastered foundation area where there are cracks m2 3,00
3. Plastering work m2 3,00
D Pekerjaan Pengecatan
 Kuas bh 1
6. New ceiling painting work m2 225,00
 Kuas bh 2

SCHOOL, BUILDING 2
Lambara Village
Rincian Bahan
1 2 3 4 5 6
7. Old ceiling painting work m2 45,00

 Plamur kg 6,75
 Kuas bh 0
 Ampelas lbr 9,0
 Plamur kg 2,98
 Kuas bh 2,00

Nama Bangunan : SD INPRES PANDERE GEDUNG 2
Pandere
Rincian Pekerja
Sat Upah
Pekerjaan Pekerja
1 2 3 4 5 6
A Pekerjaan Plafond
 Pekerja OH 4 Rp 597.600,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 36.000,00
2. Pembongkaran rangka plafon rusak / lapuk m2 14
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 270.000,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 17.550,00
3. Pemasangan rangka plafon m2 14
 Pekerja OH 3 Rp 432.000,00
 Tukang OH 5 Rp 607.500,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 13.500,00
4. Pemasangan penutup plafon tripleks 3 mm m2 45
 Pekerja OH 5 Rp 720.000,00
 Tukang OH 5 Rp 675.000,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 22.500,00
B Pekerjaan Perbaikan Dinding

 Pekerja OH 8 Rp 1.265.266,80
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 78.366,75
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 46.777,50
3. Pekerjaan Trasram m2 18,55
 Pekerja OH 6 Rp 890.400,00
 Tukang OH 3 Rp 417.375,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 27.825,00
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 249.480,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 116.943,75
 Pekerja OH 5 Rp 759.920,00
 Tukang OH 3 Rp 356.212,50
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 23.747,50
C Pekerjaan Pondasi
1. Pengerokan plesteran area pondasi yang terdapat retakan m2 3,00
 Pekerja OH 1 Rp 159.840,00
 Pekerja OH 1 Rp 132.000,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 20.625,00

Nama Bangunan : SD INPRES PANDERE GEDUNG 2
Pandere
Rincian Pekerja
Sat Upah
Pekerjaan Pekerja
1 2 3 4 5 6
3. Pekerjaan plesteran m2 3,00

 Pekerja OH 1 Rp 144.000,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 67.500,00
D Pekerjaan Pengecatan
 Pekerja OH 17 Rp 2.671.200,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 33.390,00
 Pekerja OH 8 Rp 1.140.720,00
 Tukang OH 11 Rp 1.604.137,50
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 76.387,50
 Pekerja OH 5 Rp 764.400,00
 Tukang OH 8 Rp 1.074.937,50
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 51.187,50
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 108.045,00
 Pekerja OH 4 Rp 582.120,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 70.166,25
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 15.592,50
6. Pek. Pengecatan plafond lama m2 225,00
 Pekerja OH 7 Rp 1.008.000,00
 Tukang OH 10 Rp 1.417.500,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 67.500,00
7. Pek. Pengecatan plafond baru m2 45,00
 Pekerja OH 2 Rp 201.600,00
 Tukang OH 2 Rp 283.500,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 13.500,00
 Pekerja OH 18 Rp 2.811.200,00
 Tukang OH 3 Rp 338.850,00
 Mandor OH 1 Rp 75.300,00
 Tukang OH 1 Rp 125.118,00

SDN SIDONDO
NAMA PROYEK
DETAIL ENGINEERING DESIGN

REHABILITASI BANGUNAN GEDUNG
SEKOLAH TERDAMPAK BENCANA DI
KABUPATEN SIGI
1 2 3 4 5
1600
DIBUAT OLEH
450 350 450 350
TIM KONSULTAN
A DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
TEAM LEADER / Civil Engineer TTD
700
Ir. I Ketut Sulendra, ST, MT

900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
Adhitya Hardika Anggara, ST
Surveyor
B Ellyni Dwi Fortuna, ST

200
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
C DENAH SDN
1:75
SIDONDO
DENAH SDN SIDONDO
SKALA 1:75
REFERENSI REVISI KE
KODE GBR NO. GBR JMLH. LBR
01 12
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
TAMPAK DEPAN
SKALA 1:75 TIM KONSULTAN
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
Surveyor
Ellyni Dwi Fortuna, ST
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
TAMPAK DEPAN
DAN TAMPAK 1:75
BELAKANG
REFERENSI REVISI KE
TAMPAK BELAKANG
SKALA 1:75
02 12
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
TAMPAK SAMPING KIRI TAMPAK SAMPING KANAN TIM KONSULTAN

SKALA 1:75 SKALA 1:75 TEAM LEADER / Civil Engineer TTD
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
300
Surveyor

50
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
TAMPAK
300
SAMPING DAN 1:75

POTONGAN
REFERENSI REVISI KE
200 700
POTONGAN KODE GBR NO. GBR JMLH. LBR

SKALA 1:75
03 12
NAMA PROYEK
1 2 3 4 5 REHABILITASI BANGUNAN GEDUNG

KABUPATEN SIGI
1600
450 350 450 350
A DIBUAT OLEH
TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
700
TIM KONSULTAN
900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
B Adhitya Hardika Anggara, ST

200
Surveyor
C NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
DENAH PEKERJAAN PLAFOND

DENAH
SKALA 1:75
PEKERJAAN 1:75
PLAFOND
REFERENSI REVISI KE
04 12
NAMA PROYEK

1 2 3 4 5 SEKOLAH TERDAMPAK BENCANA DI

KABUPATEN SIGI
1600
450 350 450 350
DIBUAT OLEH
A TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
Surveyor
200
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
C
DENAH PEKERJAAN LANTAI DENAH
SKALA 1:75 PEKERJAAN 1:75
LANTAI
REFERENSI REVISI KE
05 12
NAMA PROYEK

1 2 3 4 5 KABUPATEN SIGI
1600
450 350 450 350 DETAIL ENGINEERING DESIGN
DIBUAT OLEH
A TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
B Surveyor
200
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
C
DENAH
DENAH PEKERJAAN KUDA-KUDA BATA PEKERJAAN
1:75
SKALA 1:75 KUDA-KUDA
BATA
REFERENSI REVISI KE
06 12
NAMA PROYEK


KABUPATEN SIGI
1600
450 350 450 350
DIBUAT OLEH
A TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
Surveyor
200
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
C
DENAH PEKERJAAN ATAP DENAH
ATAP
REFERENSI REVISI KE
07 12
NAMA PROYEK

1 2 3 4 5 KABUPATEN SIGI
1600
DIBUAT OLEH
A TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
B Surveyor
200
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
C
DENAH
DENAH PEKERJAAN DINDING PEKERJAAN 1:75
SKALA 1:75 DINDING
REFERENSI REVISI KE
08 12
NAMA PROYEK


KABUPATEN SIGI
1600
450 350 450 350
A
DIBUAT OLEH
TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
Surveyor
200
C NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
DENAH PEKERJAAN KOLOM DENAH

KOLOM
REFERENSI REVISI KE
09 12
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI
1 2 3 4 5
1600
450 350 450 350 DIBUAT OLEH
TIM KONSULTAN
A DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
B Surveyor

200
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
C DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:75
DENAH PEKERJAAN DINDING PARTISI DINDING PARTISI
SKALA 1:75
REFERENSI REVISI KE
10 12
NAMA PROYEK
1 2 3 4 5 DETAIL ENGINEERING DESIGN

KABUPATEN SIGI
1600
450 350 450 350

DIBUAT OLEH
TIM KONSULTAN
A DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
B Surveyor

200
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
C DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:75
LISPLANK
DENAH PEKERJAAN LISPLANK

SKALA 1:75 REFERENSI REVISI KE
11 12
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI
1 2 3 4 5
1600
DIBUAT OLEH
TIM KONSULTAN
A DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
B Surveyor

200
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
C DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:75
DENAH PEKERJAAN ELEKTRIKAL ELEKTRIKAL
SKALA 1:75
REFERENSI REVISI KE
KODE KETERANGAN
SAKLAR GANDA
STOPKONTAK
BOLA LAMPU
12 12
MIS AL-KHAIRAT PAKULIGEDUNG 1
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
3340
DIBUAT OLEH
270 270 270 270 270 270 100 270 270 270 270 270 270
A TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
700
855
TIM KONSULTAN
B Estimator
155
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
C Drafter
DENAH MIS AL-KHAIRAT PAKULI GEDUNG 1

SKALA 1:110 Adhitya Hardika Anggara, ST
Surveyor
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
DENAH MIS
AL-KHAIRAT
1:110
PAKULI
GEDUNG 1
REFERENSI REVISI KE
01 09
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
TAMPAK DEPAN MIS AL-KHAIRAT GEDUNG 1 TIM KONSULTAN

SKALA 1:110
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
Surveyor
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
TAMPAK BELAKANG MIS AL-KHAIRAT GEDUNG 1 TAMPAK DEPAN

SKALA 1:110 DAN TAMPAK 1:110
BELAKANG
REFERENSI REVISI KE
02 09
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA

SKALA 1:75 SKALA 1:75
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
300
Surveyor

50
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
TAMPAK
300
SAMPING DAN 1:75

POTONGAN
REFERENSI REVISI KE
155 700
SKALA 1:75
03 09
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
TIM KONSULTAN
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 DIPERIKSA
3340
270 270 270 270 270 270 100 270 270 270 270 270 270
A
TIM KONSULTAN

700
Estimator
855
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter

B
Surveyor
155
C Ellyni Dwi Fortuna, ST
DENAH PEKERJAAN PLAFOND NAMA GAMBAR SKALA

SKALA 1:110
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:110
PLAFOND
REFERENSI REVISI KE
04 09
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
TIM KONSULTAN
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 DIPERIKSA
3340
270 270 270 270 270 270 100 270 270 270 270 270 270
A
TIM KONSULTAN

700
855
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter

155
Surveyor
DENAH PEKERJAAN LANTAI NAMA GAMBAR SKALA

SKALA 1:110
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:110
LANTAI
REFERENSI REVISI KE
05 09
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
3340
270 270 270 270 270 270 100 270 270 270 270 270 270
A
TIM KONSULTAN

700
Estimator
855
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
B Surveyor
155

C
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
DENAH PEKERJAAN DINDING
SKALA 1:110
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:110
DINDING
REFERENSI REVISI KE
06 09
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 DETAIL ENGINEERING DESIGN

DIBUAT OLEH
3340 TIM KONSULTAN

270 270 270 270 270 270 100 270 270 270 270 270 270
DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

855
Estimator
B Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
155
Drafter
C Adhitya Hardika Anggara, ST
DENAH PEKERJAAN KOLOM Surveyor

SKALA 1:110
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:110
KOLOM
REFERENSI REVISI KE
07 09
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
3340 DIBUAT OLEH
270 270 270 270 270 270 100 270 270 270 270 270 270
TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

855
Estimator
155
Drafter
Surveyor

SKALA 1:115
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:115
LISPLANK
REFERENSI REVISI KE
08 09
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
TIM KONSULTAN
3340
DIPERIKSA
270 270 270 270 270 270 100 270 270 270 270 270 270
TIM KONSULTAN
700

855
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
B Drafter
155
C Surveyor
DENAH PEKERJAAN ELEKTRIKAL

SKALA 1:110 Ellyni Dwi Fortuna, ST
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:110
ELEKTRIKAL
REFERENSI REVISI KE
KODE KETERANGAN
SAKLAR GANDA
STOPKONTAK
BOLA LAMPU
09 09
MIS AL-KHAIRAT PAKULIGEDUNG 2
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
1 2 3 4 5 6
TIM KONSULTAN
3500
DIPERIKSA
700 700 700 700 700
TIM KONSULTAN
700
880
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
B Drafter
180
C Surveyor
SKALA 1:115
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
DENAH MIS
AL-KHAIRAT
1:115
PAKULI
GEDUNG 2
REFERENSI REVISI KE
01 12
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
TAMPAK DEPAN MIS AL-KHAIRAT GEDUNG 2

SKALA 1:115
TIM KONSULTAN
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
Surveyor
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
TAMPAK BELAKANG MIS AL-KHAIRAT GEDUNG 2 TAMPAK DEPAN

SKALA 1:115
DAN TAMPAK 1:115
BELAKANG
REFERENSI REVISI KE
02 12
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
TAMPAK SAMPING KIRI TAMPAK SAMPING KANAN TEAM LEADER / Civil Engineer TTD
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
300
Surveyor

50
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
TAMPAK
SAMPING DAN 1:75
300
POTONGAN
REFERENSI REVISI KE
180 700

POTONGAN
SKALA 1:75 03 12
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI
1 2 3 4 5 6 DETAIL ENGINEERING DESIGN

DIBUAT OLEH
3500
TIM KONSULTAN
700 700 700 700 700
A DIPERIKSA
700
TIM KONSULTAN
880
Estimator
180
Drafter
C
SKALA 1:115
Surveyor
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:115
PLAFOND
REFERENSI REVISI KE
04 12
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
3500
TIM KONSULTAN
700 700 700 700 700
A DIPERIKSA
700
TIM KONSULTAN
880
Estimator
B
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
180
Drafter
C
DENAH PEKERJAAN LANTAI
SKALA 1:115
Surveyor
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:115
LANTAI
REFERENSI REVISI KE
05 12
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

1 2 3 4 5 6 DIBUAT OLEH
3500 TIM KONSULTAN

700 700 700 700 700 DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

880
Estimator
180
Drafter
DENAH PEKERJAAN ATAP Surveyor

SKALA 1:115
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:115
ATAP
REFERENSI REVISI KE
06 12
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

3500 TIM KONSULTAN

700 700 700 700 700 DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

880
Estimator
180
Drafter
DENAH PEKERJAAN DINDING Surveyor

SKALA 1:115
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:115
DINDING
REFERENSI REVISI KE
07 12
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

3500 TIM KONSULTAN

700 700 700 700 700 DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

880
Estimator
180
Drafter
DENAH PEKERJAAN KOLOM Surveyor

SKALA 1:115
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:115
KOLOM
REFERENSI REVISI KE
08 12
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

3500 TIM KONSULTAN

700 700 700 700 700 DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

880
Estimator
180
Drafter
DENAH PEKERJAAN DINDING PARTISI Surveyor

SKALA 1:115
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:115
DINDING PARTISI
REFERENSI REVISI KE
09 12
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

3500 TIM KONSULTAN

700 700 700 700 700 DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

880
Estimator
180
Drafter
DENAH PEKERJAAN PINTU Surveyor

SKALA 1:115
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:115
PINTU
REFERENSI REVISI KE
10 12
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

3500 TIM KONSULTAN

700 700 700 700 700 DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

880
Estimator
180
Drafter
DENAH PEKERJAAN JENDELA Surveyor

SKALA 1:115
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:115
JENDELA
REFERENSI REVISI KE
11 12
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI
1 2 3 4 5 6
3500 DIBUAT OLEH
700 700 700 700 700

TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

880
Estimator
180
Drafter
DENAH PEKERJAAN ELEKTRIKAL Surveyor

SKALA 1:115
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:115
ELEKTRIKAL
REFERENSI REVISI KE
KODE KETERANGAN
SAKLAR GANDA
STOPKONTAK
BOLA LAMPU
12 12
SD INPRES LAMBARA GEDUNG 1
D:\0A_PROJECT\(2020_7) Assesment YPII ke-II\SID & RAB\KOICA + YPII.jpg
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 DETAIL ENGINEERING DESIGN

DIBUAT OLEH
2780 TIM KONSULTAN

255 245 355 365 380 350 370 460 DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
B Drafter

200
Surveyor
DENAH SD INPRES LAMBARA GEDUNG 1 NAMA GAMBAR SKALA

SKALA 1:100
DENAH SD
INPRES
1:100
LAMBARA
GEDUNG 1
REFERENSI REVISI KE
01 08
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
TAMPAK DEPAN SD INPRES LAMBARA GEDUNG 1 TEAM LEADER / Civil Engineer TTD
SKALA 1:100
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
Surveyor
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
TAMPAK DEPAN
DAN TAMPAK 1:100
BELAKANG
TAMPAK BELAKANG SD INPRES LAMBARA GEDUNG 1

SKALA 1:100
REFERENSI REVISI KE
02 08
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA

Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
300
Surveyor

50
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
TAMPAK
SAMPING DAN 1:75
300
POTONGAN
REFERENSI REVISI KE
200 700
SKALA 1:75 03 08
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
2780 DIBUAT OLEH
255 245 355 365 380 350 370 460 TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter

200
Surveyor
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA

SKALA 1:100
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:100
PLAFOND
REFERENSI REVISI KE
04 08
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
2780
255 245 355 365 380 350 370 460
TIM KONSULTAN

700
Estimator
900
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
B Surveyor
200
C NAMA GAMBAR SKALA

SKALA 1:100
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:100
LANTAI
REFERENSI REVISI KE
05 08
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
2780
255 245 355 365 380 350 370 460
TIM KONSULTAN

700
Estimator
900
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
B Surveyor
200
C NAMA GAMBAR SKALA

SKALA 1:100
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:100
DINDING
REFERENSI REVISI KE
06 08
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
2780
TIM KONSULTAN
255 245 355 365 380 350 370 460
DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
B Drafter

200
Surveyor
DENAH PEKERJAAN KOLOM

SKALA 1:100 NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:100
KOLOM
REFERENSI REVISI KE
07 08
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
2780
TIM KONSULTAN
255 245 355 365 380 350 370 460
DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
B Drafter

200
Surveyor

DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:100
ELEKTRIKAL
REFERENSI REVISI KE
KODE KETERANGAN
SAKLAR GANDA
STOPKONTAK
BOLA LAMPU
08 08
SD INPRES LAMBARA GEDUNG 2
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DETAIL ENGINEERING DESIGN

DIBUAT OLEH
2600
TIM KONSULTAN
200 400 400 400 400 400 400 DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter

200
Surveyor
DENAH SD INPRES LAMBARA GEDUNG 2 NAMA GAMBAR SKALA

SKALA 1:100
DENAH SD
INPRES
1:100
LAMBARA
GEDUNG 2
REFERENSI REVISI KE
01 10
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
TAMPAK DEPAN SD INPRES LAMBARA GEDUNG 2
SKALA 1:100
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
Surveyor
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
TAMPAK DEPAN
DAN TAMPAK 1:100
BELAKANG
TAMPAK BELAKANG SD INPRES LAMBARA GEDUNG 2
SKALA 1:100
REFERENSI REVISI KE
02 10
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
TAMPAK SAMPING KIRI TAMPAK SAMPING KANAN TEAM LEADER / Civil Engineer TTD

Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
300
Surveyor
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA

50
TAMPAK
SAMPING DAN 1:75
300
POTONGAN
REFERENSI REVISI KE
200 700

POTONGAN
SKALA 1:75 03 10
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
2600
TIM KONSULTAN
200 400 400 400 400 400 400
DIPERIKSA
A
TIM KONSULTAN
700
900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
B Drafter
200
Surveyor

DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:100
PLAFOND
REFERENSI REVISI KE
04 10
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
2600
TIM KONSULTAN
200 400 400 400 400 400 400
DIPERIKSA
A
TIM KONSULTAN
700
900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
B Drafter
200
Surveyor

DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:100
LANTAI
REFERENSI REVISI KE
05 10
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
2600
TIM KONSULTAN
200 400 400 400 400 400 400
DIPERIKSA
A
TIM KONSULTAN
700
900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
B Drafter
200
Surveyor

DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:100
DINDING
REFERENSI REVISI KE
06 10
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
2600
TIM KONSULTAN
200 400 400 400 400 400 400
DIPERIKSA
A
TIM KONSULTAN
700
900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
B Drafter
200
Surveyor

DENAH PEKERJAAN DINDING PARTISI
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:100
DINDING PARTISI
REFERENSI REVISI KE
07 10
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
2600
TIM KONSULTAN
200 400 400 400 400 400 400
DIPERIKSA
A
TIM KONSULTAN
700
900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
B Drafter
200
Surveyor

DENAH PEKERJAAN KUSEN PINTU JENDELA
DENAH
PEKERJAAN
1:100
KUSEN PINTU
JENDELA
REFERENSI REVISI KE
08 10
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
2600
200 400 400 400 400 400 400 DIBUAT OLEH
TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
A
TIM KONSULTAN
700
900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
B Drafter
200
Surveyor
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
DENAH PEKERJAAN LISPLANK

SKALA 1:100
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:100
LISPLANK
REFERENSI REVISI KE
09 10
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
2600
TIM KONSULTAN
200 400 400 400 400 400 400
DIPERIKSA
A
TIM KONSULTAN
700
900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
B Drafter
200
Surveyor

DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:100
ELEKTRIKAL
REFERENSI REVISI KE
KODE KETERANGAN
SAKLAR GANDA
STOPKONTAK
BOLA LAMPU
10 10
SD INPRES 1 KALUKU TINGGU
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
2930
TIM KONSULTAN
785 785 785 575
A DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

885
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
B Drafter
185
C Surveyor
DENAH SD INPRES 1 KALUKU TINGGU Ellyni Dwi Fortuna, ST

SKALA 1:100
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
DENAH SD
INPRES 1 1:100
KALUKU TINGGU
REFERENSI REVISI KE
01 10
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
TAMPAK DEPAN SD INPRES 1 KALUKU TINGGU TIM KONSULTAN

SKALA 1:100
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
Surveyor
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
TAMPAK DEPAN
DAN TAMPAK 1:100
TAMPAK BELAKANG SD INPRES 1 KALUKU TINGGU
BELAKANG
SKALA 1:100
REFERENSI REVISI KE
02 10
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
TAMPAK SAMPING KIRI TAMPAK SAMPING KANAN

SKALA 1:75 SKALA 1:75 TIM KONSULTAN
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
300
Surveyor

50
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
TAMPAK
300
SAMPING DAN 1:75

POTONGAN
REFERENSI REVISI KE
185 700
POTONGAN
SKALA 1:75
03 10
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
2930
TIM KONSULTAN
785 785 785 575
A DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

885
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
B Drafter
185
C Surveyor
DENAH PEKERJAAN PLAFOND Ellyni Dwi Fortuna, ST

SKALA 1:100
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:100
PLAFOND
REFERENSI REVISI KE
04 10
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
2930
TIM KONSULTAN
785 785 785 575
A DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

885
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
B Drafter
185
C Surveyor
DENAH PEKERJAAN DINDING Ellyni Dwi Fortuna, ST

SKALA 1:100
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:100
DINDING
REFERENSI REVISI KE
05 10
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
2930
TIM KONSULTAN
785 785 785 575
A DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

885
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
B Drafter
185
C Surveyor
DENAH PEKERJAAN KOLOM Ellyni Dwi Fortuna, ST

SKALA 1:100
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:100
KOLOM
REFERENSI REVISI KE
06 10
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
2930
TIM KONSULTAN
785 785 785 575
A DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

885
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
B Drafter
185
C Surveyor
DENAH PEKERJAAN DINDING PARTISI Ellyni Dwi Fortuna, ST

SKALA 1:100
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:100
DINDING PARTISI
REFERENSI REVISI KE
07 10
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
2930
TIM KONSULTAN
785 785 785 575
A DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

885
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
B Drafter
185
C Surveyor
DENAH PEKERJAAN PINTU Ellyni Dwi Fortuna, ST

SKALA 1:100
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:100
PINTU
REFERENSI REVISI KE
08 10
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
2930
TIM KONSULTAN
785 785 785 575
A DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

885
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
B Drafter
185
C Surveyor
DENAH PEKERJAAN PONDASI Ellyni Dwi Fortuna, ST

SKALA 1:100
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:100
PONDASI
REFERENSI REVISI KE
09 10
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
2930
TIM KONSULTAN
785 785 785 575
A DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

885
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
B Drafter
185
C Surveyor
DENAH PEKERJAAN ELEKTRIKAL Ellyni Dwi Fortuna, ST

SKALA 1:100
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:100
ELEKTRIKAL
REFERENSI REVISI KE
KODE KETERANGAN
SAKLAR GANDA
STOPKONTAK
BOLA LAMPU
10 10
SD INPRES PANDERE GEDUNG 1
NAMA PROYEK
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 REHABILITASI BANGUNAN GEDUNG

KABUPATEN SIGI
2100
350 350 350 350 350 350

A DIBUAT OLEH
TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
700
TIM KONSULTAN
900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter

200
Surveyor
C NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
DENAH SD INPRES PANDERE GEDUNG 1

SKALA 1:75 DENAH SD
INPRES PANDERE 1:75
GEDUNG 1
REFERENSI REVISI KE
01 10
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
TAMPAK DEPAN SD INPRES PANDERE GEDUNG 1

SKALA 1:75
TIM KONSULTAN
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
Surveyor
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
TAMPAK DEPAN
DAN TAMPAK 1:75
BELAKANG
REFERENSI REVISI KE
TAMPAK BELAKANG SD INPRES PANDERE GEDUNG 1
SKALA 1:75
02 10
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA

SKALA 1:75 SKALA 1:75 TIM KONSULTAN
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
300
Surveyor

50
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
TAMPAK
300
SAMPING DAN 1:75

POTONGAN
REFERENSI REVISI KE
200 700
POTONGAN
SKALA 1:75
03 10
NAMA PROYEK
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
2100
KABUPATEN SIGI
350 350 350 350 350 350

A DIBUAT OLEH
TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
700
TIM KONSULTAN
900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter

200
Surveyor
C NAMA GAMBAR SKALA

SKALA 1:75 DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:75
PLAFOND
REFERENSI REVISI KE
04 10
NAMA PROYEK

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 SEKOLAH TERDAMPAK BENCANA DI

KABUPATEN SIGI
2100

DIBUAT OLEH
A TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
Surveyor
200
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
C
DENAH PEKERJAAN DINDING DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:75
SKALA 1:75 DINDING
REFERENSI REVISI KE
05 10
NAMA PROYEK


KABUPATEN SIGI
2100

DIBUAT OLEH
A TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
Surveyor
200
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
C
DENAH PEKERJAAN KOLOM DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:75
SKALA 1:75 KOLOM
REFERENSI REVISI KE
06 10
NAMA PROYEK


KABUPATEN SIGI
2100

DIBUAT OLEH
A TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
Surveyor
200
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
C
DENAH PEKERJAAN DINDING PARTISI DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:75
SKALA 1:75 DINDING PARTISI
REFERENSI REVISI KE
07 10
NAMA PROYEK


KABUPATEN SIGI
2100

DIBUAT OLEH
A TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
Surveyor
200
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
C
DENAH PEKERJAAN PONDASI DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:75
SKALA 1:75 PONDASI
REFERENSI REVISI KE
08 10
NAMA PROYEK


KABUPATEN SIGI
2100
350 350 350 350 350 350

DIBUAT OLEH
TIM KONSULTAN
A DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter

200
Surveyor
C NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
DENAH
DENAH PEKERJAAN LISPLANK PEKERJAAN 1:85
SKALA 1:75 LISPLANK
REFERENSI REVISI KE
09 10
NAMA PROYEK
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 REHABILITASI BANGUNAN GEDUNG

KABUPATEN SIGI
2100
350 350 350 350 350 350

DIBUAT OLEH
TIM KONSULTAN
A DIPERIKSA
TIM KONSULTAN
700

900
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
B Surveyor

200
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
C DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:75
DENAH PEKERJAAN ELEKTRIKAL ELEKTRIKAL
SKALA 1:75
REFERENSI REVISI KE
KODE KETERANGAN
SAKLAR GANDA
STOPKONTAK
BOLA LAMPU
10 10
SD INPRES PANDERE GEDUNG 2
NAMA PROYEK

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 KABUPATEN SIGI
2310

DIBUAT OLEH
A TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
700
TIM KONSULTAN
885
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
B Drafter
185
Surveyor
DENAH SD INPRES PANDERE GEDUNG 2

NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
SKALA 1:85
DENAH SD
INPRES PANDERE 1:85
GEDUNG 2
REFERENSI REVISI KE
01 07
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
TAMPAK DEPAN SD INPRES PANDERE GEDUNG 2

SKALA 1:85 TIM KONSULTAN
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
Drafter
Surveyor
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
TAMPAK DEPAN
DAN TAMPAK 1:85
BELAKANG
REFERENSI REVISI KE
TAMPAK BELAKANG SD INPRES PANDERE GEDUNG 2

SKALA 1:85
02 07
NAMA PROYEK

KABUPATEN SIGI

DIBUAT OLEH
TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA

TIM KONSULTAN
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
300
Drafter
Surveyor
50
NAMA GAMBAR SKALA

300
TAMPAK DEPAN
DAN TAMPAK 1:75
BELAKANG
REFERENSI REVISI KE
180 700
POTONGAN
SKALA 1:75
03 07
NAMA PROYEK

2310

DIBUAT OLEH
A TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
700
TIM KONSULTAN
885
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
B Drafter
185
Surveyor

NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
SKALA 1:85
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:85
PLAFOND
REFERENSI REVISI KE
04 07
NAMA PROYEK

2310

DIBUAT OLEH
A TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
700
TIM KONSULTAN
885
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
B Drafter
185
Surveyor

NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
SKALA 1:85
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:85
DINDING
REFERENSI REVISI KE
05 07
NAMA PROYEK

2310

DIBUAT OLEH
A TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
700
TIM KONSULTAN
885
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
B Drafter
185
Surveyor
DENAH PEKERJAAN TRASRAM

NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
SKALA 1:85
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:85
TRASRAM
REFERENSI REVISI KE
06 07
NAMA PROYEK

2310

DIBUAT OLEH
A TIM KONSULTAN
DIPERIKSA
700
TIM KONSULTAN
885
Estimator
Yudi K. Mowemba, ST
B Drafter
185
Surveyor
DENAH PEKERJAAN PONDASI

NAMA GAMBAR SKALA
SKALA 1:85
DENAH
PEKERJAAN 1:85
PONDASI
REFERENSI REVISI KE
07 07

Final Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Final Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Final Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PREFACE

Thanks to Department of Education and Culture, Sigi Regency, Central Sulawesi

Palu, June 2020

Ir. I Ketut Sulendra, ST., MT

Table 3.1. Types of structural damage and handling methods ........................................ 10

Figure 2.1 Map of infrastructure in Sigi Regency ............................................................ 4

1.2 Purpose, Objectives and Scope of Activities

The scope of the school building assessment activities includes:

The number of school building objects to be assessed is 5 (five) schools, namely:

1.3 Expected Outputs and Results

2.1 Location of Activities

Figure 2.1. Map of infrastructure in Sigi Regency

2.2 Condition of School Buildings

3.1 Equipment and Materials

While the materials used include:

3.3 Analysis and Presentation of Results

3.4 Methods of Strengthening and Repairing Buildings

Table 3.1. Types of structural damage and handling methods

In simple buildings (non-engineered structures), the elements that are generally

3.5 Time Schedule

Table 3.2. Time Schedule

4.1 Verification Results and Building Damage Details

Table 4.1. Recapitulation of verification and handling of building damage

No Buildings Name Damage Handling of Building Note

4.2 Results and Analysis of Data from Building Damage

Figure 4.1. Damage to the foundation that needs to be grouted

4. Handling damage to the ceiling is

5. Cracks on the floor

Figure 4.6. The ampig wall that collapsed and tilted

7. Roof frame including list plank.

8. Partition between rooms

Figure 4.8. Room partitions that need repair

4.3 Strengthening and Repairing Building Damage

Figure 4.12 Method of strengthening the walls that

Presentation of shop drawings includes drawings of damage zoning, drawings on

BUILDING NAME INSPECTION DATE LEVEL OF DAMAGE

SIDONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL May 16th, 2020 LIGHTLY DAMAGED

Poros Palu-Kulawi Street, Sidondo 1 Village

4 BUILDING FUNCTION Classroom

6 NUMBER OF STORIES 1 (one)

7 ESTIMATION OF FLOOR AREA 144 m2

LEVEL OF DAMAGE LIGHT MODERATE HEAVY NOTE

III NOTES AND RECOMMENDATIONS DOCUMENTATION OF DAMAGE

1. SDN SIDONDO _ Technical Verification Page 1 of 2

BUILDING NAME INSPECTION DATE LEVEL OF DAMAGE

SIDONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL May 16th, 2020 LIGHTLY DAMAGED

Availability of land for temporary buildings v YES NO

2 AFFECTED INFRASTRUCTURE DATA

ASSESSMENT OFFICER POSITION SIGNATURE

3 Ellyni Dwi Fortuna, ST Member

4 Adhitya Hardika Anggara, ST Member

1. SDN SIDONDO _ Technical Verification Page 2 of 2

Building Name : SIDONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Coordinate : 1,0955 S ; 119,9070 E

A. Ampig wall damage Replace ampig wall with kalsiboard

B. Floor damage Dismantle the rebate floor and replace it with

C. Ceiling damage Dismantle the damaged ceiling and

1. SDN SIDONDO _ SURVEY, IDENTIFICATION, AND DOCUMENTATION Page 1 of 5

Building Name : SIDONDO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Coordinate : 1,0955 S ; 119,9070 E