The introduction to Christian Identity: A basic overview as to why only Israelites can become Christians.

Over the past few months Christian Identity has been spreading incredibly fast; unfortunately, so are our
detractor’s misconceptions and or down right lies. Catholics and orthodox alike hardly refute our
interpretations with any argument at all wholly relying upon the grandeur Rome, of which was built
nefariously built over 1000 years ago. “Reprobate prot! You’re so dumb for only following scripture!” Is
a phrase we’ve all heard and seen shortly before being permanently banned from a general purpose
chat. Almost always due to their “holier than thou” facade. The lowest common denominations often
exclaim that CI is heretical, materialistic, and or ‘new’ therefor lacking tradition, as if a 999 year old
tradition built upon lies becomes truthful upon its 1000th anniversary. This short passage will explain
exactly why Christian Identity’s take on who can be a Christian is correct with simplicity. First, it must be
understood that the New Testament and the Old Testament are intrinsically linked to each other and
cannot be understood entirely without having knowledge of both. In Mathew 5:17-19 Jesus informs us
that the Old Testaments laws are to be followed even to this day and until Heaven and earth become
one. The excerpt reads as:

Christ Came to Fulfill the Law

¹⁷“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but
to fulfill them. ¹⁸For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass
from the Law until all is accomplished. ¹⁹Therefore whoever relaxes one of the least of these
commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but
whoever does them and teaches them will be called great in the kingdom of heaven.

Matthew 5:17-19 ESV

Now understanding that the Old Testament’s laws are indeed important let’s look into them further.
Deuteronomy 23 explains which people are certainly excluded from joining the congregation of the
Lord. Deuteronomy 23:2 reads:

“A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord; even to his tenth generation shall he not
enter into the congregation of the Lord.”

Deuteronomy 23:2 KJV

This verse explains that anyone born from a forbidden marriage may never enter the Church. More
precisely, nobody born from an inter-racial marriage may join the Church. Let’s look at the words God
chose himself to express this law.

Strongs Concordance defines the Hebrew word ‘‫’מ ְמזֵר‬ ַ as mamzer which is then translated as bastard in
the King James Version. The official definition is as follows:
4464. mamzer

Strong's Concordance

mamzer: a bastard, child of incest

Original Word: ‫ַמ ְמזֵר‬

Part of Speech: Noun Masculine

Transliteration: mamzer

Phonetic Spelling: (mam-zare')

Definition: a bastard, child of incest

Furthermore, Strongs Exhaustive Concordance defines the word ‘bastard’ as:

From an unused root meaning to alienate; a mongrel, i.e. Born of a Israelite father and a heathen
mother -- bastard.

With these verses and definitions in mind it’s clear that God forbids the entry of racemixed people into
his Church and thus his Kingdom of Heaven. Modern churchianity is quick to react to this claim with a
verse they truly do not understand. That verse would be Galicians 3:28. This verse is taken completely
out of context and it’s misunderstanding/misuse may have been and will continue to be more
detrimental for the Adamic race than any other single misused verse. The excerpt reads as follows:

“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye
are all one in Christ Jesus.”

Galatians 3:28 KJV

Seems like the silver bullet to take down CI and live happily with spic/negro wives and popes doesn’t it?
Well, no, in fact that couldn’t be further from the truth.

Upon inspection of the original Greek manuscripts one comes to the understanding that both words
‘Greek’ and ‘Jew’ mean something totally other that what your local priest explained.
According to Strongs Concordance the word ‘Jew’ translates to ‘Ἰουδαῖος’ (Ioudaios) which is derived
from the word ‘Ἰούδας’ (Ioudas) that is defined as “Judah, Judas, the name of several Israelites, also one
of the twelve tribes of Isr., also the Southern kingdom” (Strongs Concordance 2455). Further, the word
Ἰούδας is derived from the Hebrew word ‘‫ְהּודה‬ ָ ‫( ’י‬Yehudah) which is defined by Strongs Concordance as
“probably ‘praised,’ a son of Jacob, also his desc., the S. kingdom, also four Israelites” (Strongs
Concordance 3063).

This definition implies that the word ‘Jew’ used in modern translations of the Bible does not refer to
modern Jews (Edomites), but actually refers to pure Israelites of the Tribe of Judea. “But what about the
Greeks?!!” you’ll hear shortly after announcing this. Well, what about the Greeks? Can negros, spics, and
everything between somehow fit under the title of Greek? In short, absolutely not. Let’s inspect the
original manuscripts to further understand the word ‘Greek’ used in Galatians 3:28 KJV. Strongs
Concordance translates the word ‘Greek’ to the Greek word ‘Ἕλληνος’ (Hellén) which is defined as: a
Greek, usually a name for a Gentile (Strongs Concordance 1672). When this term is not used to address
Gentiles it’s used to address native inhabitants to Greece, of which those who do not worship Yahweh.
(Thayer’s Greek Lexicon: Strongs NT 1672, Definition 1 and 2). The biggest and most important
difference between Jews and Greeks is their religion. Both Judeans and Gentiles are of the blessed seed
of Abraham meaning that they are the same race. This dispels the myth that spics and negros may fit
under the title Gentile as both spics and negros are not of Abraham’s seed.

For those who are still in disbelief let’s read what Christ has said about universalism:

“And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, Have mercy
on me, O Lord, thou Son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil. But he answered her not
a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us. But he
answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel. Then came she and
worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me. But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's
bread, and to cast it to dogs. And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from
their masters' table.”

Matthew 15:22-27 KJV

In Mathew 15 we read that Jesus is approached by a bastard Canaanite in despair for her sickened
daughter’s sake. To which Jesus replies that he is not here to help her; that he’s been sent by God to
save the pure Israelites and only the pure Israelites. Jesus even compares her to a dog in contrast to
Israelite children, thus completely demolishing the notion that Christianity is a universal religion that any
humanoid may enter.
Now, a more well read Catholic might point out Deuteronomy 23:7-8 which some interpret to exalt
bastards from their damnation.

Thou shalt not abhor an (((Edomite)))?

A common challenge to the CI identification of the Jew with Esau-Edom is that Deut. 23:7-8 appears to
exclude the Edomites from being hated on account of them being our brethren, while stating that 3rd
generation mischlings may join the congregation.

We will protest this notion, as this is both contrary to the biblical narrative (Mal. 1:3-4), but is also a very
absurd proposition, given that the Edomites were Canaanite by blood (Gen. 36). The more likely reading
is that Edomite actually would have read 'Aramite'. This would be due to a scribal error after the
Judahites adopted the Aramaic script over their former Paleo-Hebrew in the 3rd Century BC.

Bearing in mind that Hebrew didn't have written vowel marks until the late masoretic scribes introduced
them, and that in the Aramaic script the dalet (D) and reish (R) look near identical (fig 3), one can see
how a misplaced pen stroke could change ‫( ארומי‬Aramean) into ‫( אדומי‬Edomite).

From this short reading one may come to the conclusion that Christianity is indeed only for the Adamic
race. More specifically Christianity is only for the House of Israel, meaning purely white people.