Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IP4 Project Time Cost and Scope Management
IP4 Project Time Cost and Scope Management
Darlenzo Hines
10/16/2022
TIME, COST AND SCOPE MANAGEMENT 2
Contents
Assignment Guidelines..................................................................................................................3
Memorandum...............................................................................................................................4
Things to be taken into account before approving or objecting the vendor proposal?................4
The decision’s impact on the entire project?...............................................................................5
The kind of stakeholders to be incorporated in the process of decision-making.........................6
Factors that stakeholders must discuss and agree upon..............................................................6
Recommendation ............................................................................................................................7
References.......................................................................................................................................8
TIME, COST AND SCOPE MANAGEMENT 3
Assignment Guidelines
What do you need to consider before accepting or denying the vendor proposal? Explain.
What important factors would need to be discussed and agreed upon by the various stakeholders
Memorandum
This memo will discuss the $25,000 software add-on that take four more
additional weeks to implement and facilitate the integration of the present
customer service system with the functions of the customer service billing system.
It will describe the factors that must be taken into account before approving or
objecting the vendor proposal and how the chosen course of action would impact
the project as a whole. Last but not least, it will clarify the critical issues that need
to be addressed and decided by the project's stakeholders and the stakeholders
who would advisable to be incorporated in the decision-making process, as well
as the reasons behind it.
The project budget should be taken into account when determining if to accept or
reject the vendor bid. This project has a $100,000 budget, so in order to approve
the proposal without asking the financial decision-makers of the project for more
money, the project needs to be drifting toward a $75,000 total cost. The proposal
will additionally need to be assessed against the typical project approval criteria
because it is not a part of the main project. The vendor's comprehension of our
needs is another item to take into account. Is the software add-on actually assist
the company and deliver a great experience accountable for the extra money and
time, suggesting that the vendor recognizes our needs, perhaps greater than we
actually do, or did the vendor regarded or considered this idea in to gain more
TIME, COST AND SCOPE MANAGEMENT 5
money from our company? I think the latter, based on our working relationship
with the provider.
The project sponsor mandated to offer support and resources for the project,
would be the first of many stakeholders who will require to be included in the
decision-making process. The decision will also require input from the billing
department’s directors and customer service. To help secure the resources
required for this particular project in its revised form, the project sponsor must be
involved. The sponsor, a crucial project ally, exerts influence to secure project
approval. The billing department’s directors, along with the customer service
assist in resolving or lowering technical issues and offer insightful technical
advice. Their approval of project work that has been completed may be crucial for
in-house projects. They can as well reduce any disruptions that may result from
the project within their own departments. To ensure that the team members
chosen are readily available or willing for the entirety of the project section for
which they will be required, a representative from the human resources is another
stakeholder to be considered. The extra four weeks can conflict with another
concurrent project in which one or more members of the team are required for that
assignment. I’m a stakeholder in the decision as the project manager, as shown
by the fact that I evaluated the proposal and submitted this memo. Being the
project manager, I might also have a say in who is chosen to work with the
vendor's software add-on team.
The concerned parties must talk about the extra value of the software add-on
relative to the expense and lengthening of the project. We might not be in a
position to buy the add-on right now if the project involves a crucial or time-
sensitive component. It should also be highlighted the advantage of not needing
internal staff to handle the data transfer or movement from the present customer
service system to the customer service function of the new billing system. Our
team members can finish other assignments if they aren't hindered by this part of
the job. It's also important to talk about the added risk brought on by the software
add-on. Increased risk can make project team members more anxious and
stressed, and it can also place more demands on the team leader(s) in terms of
managing human resources. The team members required to help the
vendor/supplier with the proposed software add-on must be available, which is
another human capital management issue that needs to be addressed.
Recommendation
I advise against investing the project's $100,000 budget in the software add-on.
Being a significant investment (software add-on), it would be difficult to pay and
TIME, COST AND SCOPE MANAGEMENT 7
would not easily fit into the budget. Although the software add-on offers
advantages, we did not seek it in the initial or first request for proposals,
suggesting that we already had a plan to address it. We can continue with the plan
and obtain the long-awaited result just as well. Living by the reality that this
would add four more weeks to the project prevents it from purchasers. That
amount of extra time is good for our systems to be in transition and enough time
for things to go unexpected and have a bad effect on the project. We would be
giving non-workers accessibility to the customers' profiles and additional
information if we let the vendor manage the connection of the current customer
service with the functions or features of the new billing system. To protect us, our
clients, and the vendor, extra paperwork, such a non-disclosure agreement, would
need to be executed before doing this. In this case, the disadvantages, in my
opinion, exceed the advantages.
TIME, COST AND SCOPE MANAGEMENT 8
References
https://coloradotech.vitalsource.com/books/9781260736205
Project Management Institute (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge
https://learningsolutionsmag.com/articles/2135/marc-my-words-evaluating-vendor-
proposals