HOME CURRENT ISSUE PAST ARTICLES TRAINING CMMQ PUBLICATIONS

The Role of Basic Dimensions in Data Reporting for Geometric Tolerances – Part 1 TREE MENU
Written by Evan Janeshewski Home

A common question asked by CMM inspectors is whether or not to include basic dimensions on inspection reports.  GD&T theory tells us that basic Current Issue
dimensions are theoretically exact and are not directly toleranced.  Despite this, reporting measured values for basic dimensions is a common practice
and is used by many companies to make adjustments to manufacturing processes.  Customers often ask to see measured values for basic dimensions on Past Articles
inspection reports.  Is this a legitimate request, or is it based on a flawed understanding of geometric tolerancing?  Reporting of basic dimensions is one
of the key issues addressed by the ASME Y14.45 standard for Measurement Data Reporting, which is currently in development. Training

Dimensioning and Tolerancing Standards Perspective Calypso

CMM Manager
One core concept of geometric tolerancing in the ASME Y14.5 Dimensioning and Tolerancing standard is that features (or their components) are
controlled within tolerance zones of a particular shape and size.  These zones are built on a framework of theoretically exact geometry defined by basic DMIS Corner
dimensions.  The framework describes the as-designed orientation and location relationships between the toleranced features, as their relationship to
datum features.  This is a fundamental difference between geometric tolerancing and plus/minus tolerancing, in which dimensions are directly toleranced. General
 With geometric characteristics, the tolerance value is represented in terms the size of a zone – not in terms of dimensions.  The Y14.5.1 standard for
GD&T
Mathematical Definitions for Dimensioning and Tolerancing also defines actual values of geometric characteristics in terms of the size of a zone.  The
dimensions of the theoretically exact geometry are not variables – they are constants. MCOSMOS

  PC-DMIS

Mark Boucher Consulting

Today I Learned

CMMQ Publications

CMM TRAINING

    

Quality Assurance Perspective

The AS9102 aerospace quality assurance standard states that design characteristics can be measured, inspected, tested, or verified to determine
conformance to the design requirements.  Based on the ASME standards, basic dimensions do not meet this definition of design characteristics – they
cannot be measured and do not have requirements to conform to.  Thus the applicable values for AS9102 Form 3 for Characteristic Accountability are
measured values for geometric characteristics such as position and profile – not measured values for the basic dimensions.

Basic Dimensioning Methods

The Y14.5 standard allows the theoretically exact part geometry to be defined in various ways.  Basic dimensions can be explicitly specified on a drawing
in different layouts such as rectangular or polar coordinates.  Certain basic dimensions, such as basic 90 degree angles, are implied.  If a model-based
definition is used, explicit basic dimensions may not appear on a drawing at all.

Any of these methods can be used equivalently, without affecting the geometric tolerance.  The meaning of each geometric tolerance is identical in each
of the above cases.  Again, this is because the basic dimensions are properties of the theoretically perfect part definition – they are not applied to the real
part.  This is another strong indication that measured values corresponding to basic dimensions do not have a direct relationship to the specified
geometric tolerance.

Application of Geometric Tolerances to a Real Part

Illustrating the geometric tolerances in the context of a real part shows how the theoretically exact geometry provides a framework for the datums and
zones.  The tolerance zones are constructed at their basic locations, with the zone sizes determined by the tolerance values.  Measured values are
calculated by constructing fitted zones at these same basic locations, with sizes that just envelop the features.  These results are independent of the basic
dimensioning method used – this is because the basic dimensions only apply to the theoretically exact geometry, and are not directly applied to the real
part.  There is no requirement to measure dimensions on the real part – only to measure the features and establish the zone sizes.  This is a subtle but
important distinction.

Summary

From the standpoint of geometric tolerancing and the associated standards, basic dimensions represent theoretically exact geometry that does not vary.
 With geometric characteristics, the tolerance value and measured value are based on zones and not on dimensions.  For conformance assessment,
there is no requirement to report measured values that correspond to basic dimensions.  

Part 2 of this article will examine basic dimensions from the standpoint of manufacturing process feedback.  Since real part dimensions corresponding to
basic dimensions are being measured and reported in industry, we will examine how this is being done.  This will identify situations in which these
measured values provide useful information, and in which they may be misleading and confusing.

All materials in this magazine are the property of CMM Quarterly and its affilate companies and are made Copyright © 2007 - 2016 CMM Quarterly. All rights reserved. 
available for the readers information but may not be copied, reproduced, or distributed for profit.
Please consider a donation to help with the costs of publishing this free magazine. Click here to donate.

JSN Megazine template designed by JoomlaShine.com