Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Corruption in Government
Corruption in Government
CORRUPTION
Corruption refers to abusing public authority for self-benefit. It could be done by such an
elected official, a civil servant, a journalist, a school official, or any individual with authority. In
addition to public corruption, there is private corruption between people and businesses. For
example, education, ancestry, marriage, and so on. As a result, the term corruption applies to
various forms. It is deceptive behavior displayed by individuals who hold positions of power for
personal gain. It is particularly usual in government officials and managers. Bribery,
embezzlement, extortion, networking, under-the-table transactions, actual vote manipulation,
financial crimes, and other forms of corruption exist. It can breed distrust among the involved
parties. Furthermore, this is not appropriate for a state because it can diminish the mechanism
and impede the country's economic development. As a result, it will exacerbate inequalities and
social division.
This abuse of power undermines trust among two or more political parties and weakens
democracy. Not only that, but corruption could stifle a country's economic progress and
exacerbate poverty and inequality. It is crucial to comprehend how politics works in order to
expose it and hold the corrupt accountable for constructing a corrupt political system.
SOURCE OF CORRUPTION
Tax System - frequently a source of corruption, especially when the underlying
legislature is questionable and otherwise hard to understand, presumably giving tax
assessors and auditors significant leeway throughout analysis.
Political System – this is where the operation of the country began, where the
processes began and finalized the decisions of the official of the government, and which
is where the beginning of being corrupt could happened.
Failure of Governance - poor governance can result from poor public-sector
management, an absence of accountability, poor relations between both the citizens
and government, a weak legal structure, an inadequate level of transparency regards to
public sector methods, and poor dissemination of information. Inadequate training also
leads to a lack of competence and capacity, which contributes to governance failure.
Wages - low wages and the eventually results poverty in the government sector are
thought to be contributing to corruption.
Social Capital - refers to society's links, shared values, and understandings that allow
both individuals and groups to trust one another and thus operate together; regions
with higher socioeconomic capital are much more likely to have a lower level of
corruption.
Large Unique Projects / Big Projects - these projects have a higher risk to be corrupted
than relatively small and more planning and action.
Country Size - countries with a large geographic region and a low density of people are
more vulnerable to corruption due to the challenge of monitoring public officials in
dispersed locations.
Resources - numerous resource-rich countries are suffering as a result of ineffective
governance and systemic corruption.
The Bureau of Customs is headed by the Customs Commissioner. Assisted by six (6) Deputy
Commissioners, one (1) Assistant Commissioner and seventeen (17) District Collectors who
supervise the country’s principal ports of entry.
Internal Administration Group (IAG) - This group, led by a Deputy Commissioner, assists
the Commissioner in the formulation of guidelines and the establishment of objectives
pertaining to the BOC's financial, administrative, personnel, planning, and management
improvement services; represents the Commissioner in discussions and conferences;
signs memorandum circulars; as well as reviews official correspondence and transcripts
pertinent to administrative structure.
Intelligence Group (IG) – This group collects intelligence information about Customs
and economic activities, conducts internal investigations, and develops appropriate
measures to prevent corruption, smuggling, and other aspects of customs fraud.
Enforcement Group (EG) – This group has police authority over secure the country's
ports and BOC installations, as well as cargoes and property within the customs zone.
Post Clearance Audit Group (PCAG) - Formerly known as the Post Entry Audit Group,
has been reactivated by Customs Memorandum Order (CMO) No. 32-2017. (PEAG).
PEAG was established in 2003 by Executive Order 160-2003 to perform post-clearance
audit work for the Bureau of Customs. PEAG's functions were transferred to the
Department of Finance in 2013, until President Rodrigo Duterte signed Executive Order
No. 46 in October 2017, restoring the BOC's post-clearance audit function. PCAG is led
by an Assistant Commissioner who has direct supervision and control over the
management of the organization's operating units, which include the Trade Information
and Risk Analysis Office and the Compliance Assessment Office.
The Bureau of Customs was reorganized on February 4, 1965, in accordance with Customs
Administrative Order No. 4-65, which was issued under the authority of Sections 550 and 551 of
the Revised Administrative Code of Republic Act 4164. During the reorganization, offices
directly under the Commissioner's supervision and control were elevated to the Department
Level, with ranks higher than the Division Level. Public Relations, Personnel, Legal,
Administrative Service, Budget and Finance, and Management Improvement were among the
departments involved. Similarly, three (3) higher-ranking Customs positions were established:
Assistant Commissioner for Revenue, Assistant Commissioner for Security, and Director for
Operations.
Customs Administrative Order No. 4065 was later amended, eliminating the position of
Assistant Commissioner for Security and creating the position of Director for
Administration. The Tariff and Customs Code of the Philippines was revised by Congress
in 1972. However, before it could be put into effect, the President of the Republic of the
Philippines issued Proclamation No. 1081 declaring Martial Law in the country on
September 21, 1972.
President Ferdinand E. Marcos signed Presidential Decree No. 34, amending the
Philippine Tariff and Customs Code, on October 27, 1972. The new Code went into effect
on November 26, 1972, with the exception of Section 104, which went into effect on
January 1, 1973. On September 24, 1972, Presidential Decree No. 1 went into effect,
creating six (6) Customs Services under the Office of the Commissioner and creating
jurisdictional limits of twelve (12) collection districts with the Principal Ports and Sub-
ports of Entry under the supervision and control of the Collector of the Principal Port of
Entry.
As a result of this reorganization, the heads of various services were renamed Customs
Service Chiefs, and heads of offices with divisional ranks were renamed Customs
Operations Chiefs, with the Head of the National Customs Police serving as Director. The
Directors for Administration and Operations, as well as the Assistant Commissioner for
Revenue, were eliminated as part of this reorganization.
The Bureau underwent another reorganization under Presidential Decree No. 689 in
1975, and the result is what you see now in the Organization Chart, with some minor
changes and modifications. On June 11, 1978, the Tariff & Customs Code was further
amended, modified, and supplemented by new positions to make it a responsive code in
line with the New Society's developmental programs. The new Code was enshrined in
Presidential Decree No. 1464.
The Bureau's most recent major reorganization occurred in 1986, following the EDSA
Revolution, with the issuance of Executive Order No. 127, which expanded the
organization umbrella of the Central Office by providing offices that will monitor and
coordinate assessment and operations of the Bureau and provided for a staff of
approximately 5,500 customs personnel. The computerization program's
implementation also necessitated the formation of a new Group to ensure its ongoing
development and progress. Executive Order No. 463, dated January 9, 1998, authorized
the formation of the Management Information System and Technology Group (MISTG)
under a new Deputy Commissioner with 92 positions.
ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
https://customs.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Orgchart10-10-022-Central-
scaled.jpg
https://customs.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Orgchart-10-10-2022-CD-
scaled.jpg
VISION
A modernized and credible Customs administration that is among the world’s best
MISSION
CORE VALUES
Professionalism
Integrity
Accountability
Transparency - Should verify that its customs procedures are applied predictably,
consistently, and transparently, in accordance with international standards and best
practices. Traders should have access to appeal and administrative review mechanisms
in order to challenge or seek review of customs-related determinations.
Reform and Modernization - Should review their customs systems and procedures on a
regular basis, with the goal of streamlining out-of-date and burdensome practices and
procedures and increasing transparency in decision-making to reduce opportunities for
unethical, fraudulent, or illegal behavior and such as corrupt behavior.
Tighten Inspections - Customs must tighten safety checks on risky transactions and
require importers to submit additional documentation if the price they declare falls
below a predetermined threshold level.
Identify Processes for Managing and Payments - Obtain support, and hold regular
reviews of management's progress.