Ambiguity and Uncertainties in Law Create A Disorderly and Disruptive Society Whose Progress Towards Greater Equity Is Always Impeded - Justice Gautam Patel

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

11/29/22, 7:53 PM Ambiguity And Uncertainties in Law Create a Disorderly And Disruptive Society Whose Progress Towards Greater

s Greater Equity is Alwa…

Subscribe Premium LOGIN

TOP STORIES NEWS UPDATES COLUMNS INTERVIEWS ENVIRONMENT RTI

KNOW THE LAW VIDEOS SPONSORED ROUND UPS PODCAST LAW EXAMS

JOB UPDATES BOOK REVIEWS EVENTS CORNER LAW FIRMS SC JUDGMENTS लाइव लॉ हिंदी LAW SCHOOLS IB

 Search... 
Home / News Updates / Ambiguity And...

NEWS UPDATES

Ambiguity And Uncertainties in Law


Create a Disorderly And Disruptive
Society Whose Progress Towards Greater
Equity is Always Impeded:Justice
Gautam Patel
LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK 29 Nov 2022 5:28 PM

https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/justice-gautam-patel-ambiguity-and-uncertainties-in-law-create-a-disorderly-and-disruptive-society-litigation-215349 1/8
11/29/22, 7:53 PM Ambiguity And Uncertainties in Law Create a Disorderly And Disruptive Society Whose Progress Towards Greater Equity is Alwa…

Bombay High Court judge Justice Gautam Patel recently talked about

Constitutional issues awaiting us in 'Amrit Kaal'- Antitrust, Privatisation,

Metaverse, Climate litigation.

"What does constitutional law have to do with commerce? What does the

Constitution have to do with commerce and business? My answer is

'everything'. We have become so used to seeing the Constitution as being

limited to certain parts- Part III 'Fundamental Rights'- that we are not realising

the Constitution for what it is, which is the charter for us as a society and all

its problems, including the way we go about living, working, earning and

doing business. There are phrases in the Constitution which are important,

and we have begun to fling a couple of them around without really pausing to

think about them. One of those words is 'justice'. The Constitution begins

with this and we have to pause once in a while to ask what this means and

what it really means", he began.

https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/justice-gautam-patel-ambiguity-and-uncertainties-in-law-create-a-disorderly-and-disruptive-society-litigation-215349 2/8
11/29/22, 7:53 PM Ambiguity And Uncertainties in Law Create a Disorderly And Disruptive Society Whose Progress Towards Greater Equity is Alwa…

Continuing, Justice Patel explained, "When we began, we were perhaps

reacting to a half-century of gross exploitation- the Bengal famine, there is

enough documentation to show that it was atleast in some ways engineered

at a tremendous cost to human life, and the result was that we wound up with

what is clearly a false binary of capitalism versus socialism, or rich versus

poor which is another question because there have been rich always and

there have been poor always. The only question really that we need to ask

ourselves is about efficiency. What is the most efficient, most economical

way to do the most equity, to do the greatest good, the labels that you attach

to this don't matter. A principle of governance which says that we will take it

away because we think you have too much does not address the question of

either justice or of efficiency".

"Certainty is the other aspect. In the context of commercial enterprises and

businesses, obvious examples are taxation- you must know where you stand

and what the tax law is. But there is a more fundamental thing here- certainty

in decision-making. There cannot be consistency, there will be changes, but

certainty is needed. It has two components- predictability- when asked by a

client what will happen in the given scenario, to be forced to a position where

one has to say 'we don't know, let's see what the courts do', that has a

devastating downstream effect because corporate and businesses do not

know how to plan. Certainty is required because it is the fundamental under-

pinning of the rule of law. People know what to do and how to go about doing

it if the law is certain. Ambiguity and uncertainties in the law create a

disorderly, disruptive, disorganised society whose progress towards greater

equity is always impeded", he elaborated.

https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/justice-gautam-patel-ambiguity-and-uncertainties-in-law-create-a-disorderly-and-disruptive-society-litigation-215349 3/8
11/29/22, 7:53 PM Ambiguity And Uncertainties in Law Create a Disorderly And Disruptive Society Whose Progress Towards Greater Equity is Alwa…

"My list (cause-list) today, Friday, was entirely of writ petition, claims for

protection under article 226 invoking some form of some right under part III of

the Constitution, arbitrariness or violation of article 19(1) of the freedoms. I

quickly looked at the list on the phone and I counted. 47% of the cases total

were by commercial entities and not individuals. There were some coming in

for pension, some for individual benefits, but a full 47% of the others were in

court invoking a constitutional right in the context of a commercial enterprise.

That should tell you somewhat of where we are going with this conversation",

he added.

Continuing, Justice Patel canvassed, "The other aspect which everybody

talks about is pendency. Nobody has defined it. Nobody knows what this

beast is and it is the 800 pound gorilla in the room. The minute a case of any

description is filed, it is pending. Immediately your meter, your ticker goes up

by one but that case is not ready for disposal by the fastest of the fastest of

the fastest judges. It can't be done because the judicial process mandates

that you have to give a copy of this lawsuit to the other side, serve him and

get him to court, give him time to respond to your case. Once he has filed it-

fair enough, don't give any adjournments, accepted- but once he has been

given enough opportunities, then decide it. How is it pending until then?

These numbers lie. Unless you sort out and identify the problem, you're

never going to be able to address the solution correctly. You are looking at

this huge mountain and you're wondering how you will ever get over it. One

of my fellow judges yesterday said that it is an odd thing what will we say

about ourselves at the end of our tenure as judges once we retire, that there

was an ocean of cases and after 10 or 12 or 15 years maybe, I emptied two

https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/justice-gautam-patel-ambiguity-and-uncertainties-in-law-create-a-disorderly-and-disruptive-society-litigation-215349 4/8
11/29/22, 7:53 PM Ambiguity And Uncertainties in Law Create a Disorderly And Disruptive Society Whose Progress Towards Greater Equity is Alwa…

buckets out of it. But the ocean is what it is. Glaciers melt faster than we can

dispose off cases. Why? How? Many solutions, many problems. But it is

crucial to the advancement of the system"

"On the 'bossy State' and on privatisation- how much privatisation and of

what would be constitutionally valid? How many of our resources would you

accept passing into private hands? Drinking water, breathable air? What are

the limits to this privatisation, and there must be some limits and we must

define those. On the 'bossy State', the government is now a market player, it

wants to be a corporate and it is a jealous and envious market player and

one armed ferociously with powers that private corporates do not have. This

will be a test of the future, we are going to have to test how much corporate

impulse from the government can be accepted as constitutionally good. We

are going to have to redefine the boundaries of what a government can

legitimately and permissibly do in the name of governance, how far exactly it

can go. This is a direct collusion with the other thought of privatisation

because the two don't go hand-in-hand. At some time, this is going to be a

cataclysmic explosion and it is going to happen in the law courts with very,

very far-reaching consequences", he discussed.

"Last point, what is it that judges should be doing in courts? Should we just

give you a judgment and leave it to you to figure out what you want to do with

it or should we issue directions, and continue issuing directions, demanding

compliance? Are we crossing lines, crossing boundaries, going over into the

other side of the organs of the government? I don't know. Society has to

decide this for us and they have to tell us that if you, as judges, are going to

function then you only deliver judgments on what the law says and how
https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/justice-gautam-patel-ambiguity-and-uncertainties-in-law-create-a-disorderly-and-disruptive-society-litigation-215349 5/8
11/29/22, 7:53 PM Ambiguity And Uncertainties in Law Create a Disorderly And Disruptive Society Whose Progress Towards Greater Equity is Alwa…

things stand, and what to do with your judgment, we will decide not to you.

That will also shape the future", continued Justice Patel.

"One more issue will come in addition to the others- Environment and climate

change is going to be a problem, essentially a measuring problem.

Everybody will say that that piece of land should be preserved as a forest

and you should not have an industry near it or a highway through it. Nobody

is measuring relative courses in a scientifically acceptable manner, this is

something that we have to start doing. It is not a contest between rupees on

the one side, and what is nice to have, on the other. That is a false metric

and an untenable position going forward", he illustrated.

"The other issue that is going to happen in corporates and in boardrooms are

struggles and contestations as companies become bigger and bigger and

become huge buccaneering behemoths, very much like the East India

company used to be, in that conflict with minority rights. This is going to be a

big thing because now you have extremely empowered minority rights and as

corporates get bigger, their management tends to get more cautious. They

have a whole lot more to lose whereas the minority seems to want them to

be more aggressive and adventurous in corporate decision-making. This is

going to be a conflict and old settled law will have to be up-ended in the next

five or 10 years when we are looking at minority rights", he signed off

TAGS JUSTICE GAUTAM PATEL

https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/justice-gautam-patel-ambiguity-and-uncertainties-in-law-create-a-disorderly-and-disruptive-society-litigation-215349 6/8
11/29/22, 7:53 PM Ambiguity And Uncertainties in Law Create a Disorderly And Disruptive Society Whose Progress Towards Greater Equity is Alwa…

+ VIEW MORE
SIMILAR
POSTS

+ MORE
LAW FIRMS

+ MORE
LATEST NEWS

लाइव लॉ हिंदी + MORE

INTERNATIONAL + MORE

+ MORE
ENVIRONMENT

JOB UPDATES

TOP STORIES KNOW THE LAW

NEWS UPDATE LAW FIRMS

COLUMNS JOB UPDATES

INTERVIEWS BOOK REVIEWS

INTERNATIONAL EVENTS CORNER

RTI UPDATES COVER STORY

https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/justice-gautam-patel-ambiguity-and-uncertainties-in-law-create-a-disorderly-and-disruptive-society-litigation-215349 7/8
11/29/22, 7:53 PM Ambiguity And Uncertainties in Law Create a Disorderly And Disruptive Society Whose Progress Towards Greater Equity is Alwa…

EDITOR'S PICK PLACEMENTS

LAW SCHOOL CORNER SCHOLARSHIPS

ARTICLES SEMINARS

CALL FOR PAPERS ENVIRONMENT

COMPETITIONS BOOK REVIEWS

INTERNSHIPS

2022 © All Rights Reserved @LiveLaw

Powered By Hocalwire

Who We Are Careers Advertise With Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms And Conditions



X
Live Law subscriptions starting ₹ 899 +GST

Subscribe to Live Law now and get unlimited access.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Already have an account? Sign In

https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/justice-gautam-patel-ambiguity-and-uncertainties-in-law-create-a-disorderly-and-disruptive-society-litigation-215349 8/8

You might also like