Chinese records from the Song-Ming period provide valuable context on pre-colonial Philippines history since no other written records existed. Rulers of Philippine chiefdoms formed extensive trade networks with each other and China, employing unique methods. Traders were agents of local rulers and helped build wealth and power. Chinese records reveal details on trading practices, including designated trading areas and gift-giving to gain rapport. This economic role and maritime trade motivated rulers to send traders to China and seek recognition of their power relations.
Chinese records from the Song-Ming period provide valuable context on pre-colonial Philippines history since no other written records existed. Rulers of Philippine chiefdoms formed extensive trade networks with each other and China, employing unique methods. Traders were agents of local rulers and helped build wealth and power. Chinese records reveal details on trading practices, including designated trading areas and gift-giving to gain rapport. This economic role and maritime trade motivated rulers to send traders to China and seek recognition of their power relations.
Chinese records from the Song-Ming period provide valuable context on pre-colonial Philippines history since no other written records existed. Rulers of Philippine chiefdoms formed extensive trade networks with each other and China, employing unique methods. Traders were agents of local rulers and helped build wealth and power. Chinese records reveal details on trading practices, including designated trading areas and gift-giving to gain rapport. This economic role and maritime trade motivated rulers to send traders to China and seek recognition of their power relations.
THE PRE- COLONIAL HISTORY OF Wondrous observation from the star THE PHILIPPINES raft (Xingcha shenglan 星槎勝覽) WANG ZHENPING Wondrous observation of the ocean shores. (Yingya shenglan 瀛涯勝覽),
I Trading activities and political power
Chinese records of the Song-Ming period provide the context necessary 971 for our understanding of the history of - traders from Mayi came to canton the pre-colonial Philippines. 960 -1127 Rulers of chiefdoms in the region – Northern Song Dynasty (attention of employed unique methods and formed Chinese official at local Bureau of far-reaching networks when trading Maritime Trade) with each other and with China. Early 11th Century Chinese records contain a wealth of - Traders from Paduan(Northern information on pre-colonial Southeast Mindanao) and Sanmalan Asia. Although fragmentary, these (Zamboanga) records are valuable since no other 1004,1007,1011 written records existed prior to the - Traded with Song Court – respectively arrival of the Europeans in the region. brought home China Ceramics Their compilers often gathered 1127 relevant information from merchants - Southern Song dynasty trading to Southeast Asia or to China, - Bureau of Maritime trade in Fujian a envoys coming from the region, or various Philippine islands Chinese officials working at the 1271-1368 Bureau of Maritime Trade. - Continues trading during Yuan Chinese records have obfuscated the Dynasty historical reality of countries in the region, since their compilers observed these countries from a Chinese Traders from the Philippines were not worldview. merely private merchants. They were And the terminologies they used to either agents for local chieftains or describe the events in the region were they themselves were potential also laden with their own political contenders for power. ideology. Political Implications - In pre-colonial Southeast Asia, power WANG ZHENPING structures “did not conform to typical argues that the problem in using hierarchical models,” and lineage had Chinese records to study pre-colonial often been downplayed Southeast Asia is not that these - a person could effectively build his records were produced by people of wealth and power by trading to China. their own cultural convictions, but that - elevated status was, of course, due not we must treat these records as to his tattooed body, but to a unique critically as we can, and hope that our tribal tradition: a man who had been to interpretations derived from the China deserved respect irrespective of records could better reflect historical his age. reality. - people respected those who had brought home such invaluable YUAN AND DYNASTY WORK (some/few information as the sea routes leading works) to China, the sailing conditions and the durations of voyages, the locations centers, each of which consisted of a number of overseas ports, the trading of local communities. opportunities, and the demand for local and Chinese products. Breaking Mayi’s Monopoly - China presented opportunities for the trading parties to amass riches. Some Song-dynasty Chinese merchants sailed directly to Sandao II Trading pattern and power structure and Pulilu 蒲 哩 嚕 (present-day Manila). They probably fetched Trading practice in Mayi higher prices for their goods. They fetched higher prices for their - When Chinese merchants of the Song goods. dynasty arrived in Mayi to do They have lost the effective protection business, they would anchor their that the powerful Mayi chieftain had ships at an officially designated place once offered them. (guanchang 官場) that would serve as Take hostages unique featured of trade a trading plaza. - They were allowed to disembark from Trading Practice in Boni (Brunei) their ships and mingle with the locals. - Similar to Mayi - They often presented white umbrellas - They reveal an interesting details of to the local chieftain as a way to build how a paramount chiefdorms with two rapport with him. decision making levels actually - Trading practice in Mayi was unique functioned. and was based entirely on mutual - rapport-building would continue for trust. several months before they eventually - business transactions conducted at a invited the chieftain and his major designated place and goods handled assistants to inspect and fi x the values by local merchants, this trading for their cargos. No goods should be practice at Mayi aimed at monopoly of traded before the Boni ruler fixed maritime trade. their values. - many of the imported goods were not consumed locally, but were The great economic value of maritime trade transported and sold to other places. and the use of such trade to build domestic power and to control neighboring This consumption and distribution chiefdoms prompted the rulers of the pattern of foreign goods indicated Philippine archipelagos to send their own that some of the chiefdoms in the traders to China during the fifteenth Philippines maintained inter- century. archipelago economic ties with one another. Through monopoly of 1417 China trade, the ruler of Mayi - Chieftain came to trade with China the managed to exercise a degree of Three rulers who visit Ming court influence and control over such offered Joint Mission. minor chiefdoms as Jamayan, Balaoyou, and Bajinong 巴 吉 弄 The three rulers (present-day Busuanga). Chinese Baduge Badala (Paduka Patala) sources record them as - Eastern King of Sulu “subordinates (shu 屬)” to Mayi. Mahalatu Gelamanding (Maharaja Klainbantangan) a “paramount chiefdom” headed by the ruler - Western King of Sulu of Mayi. A “paramount chiefdom” was one Baduge Balabu (Puduka Prabu) that had a first-order center, which directly or - Wife of the late king of the Mountain indirectly controlled several second-order tribes (Tongwang) They brought not only gift with the Ming - A chieftain had to guard his territories emperor but also goods that can be sold against threat by other tribes. through market. The Ming court fixed the prices for these goods according to their Many of the chiefdoms in Southeast Asia market values, and allowed them to be traded existed in geographically separated regions. without taxing them. This joint mission was But their chieftains did not isolate themselves therefore also a trading mission. Among the from the outside world. They formed power goods traded between China and Sulu, Chinese relations with one another. porcelain and Sulu pearls were particularly famous. As these relations evolved, they often tried to define their positions relative to each other by III Power relation and Mission to China organizing a “joint mission” to seek Chinese recognition of their relationship. As early as the Yuan dynasty, Chinese writers observed that power relations existed between the Philippine chiefdoms and Borneo. The Joint Mission (Mission to China) Gazetteer of the South Sea compiled during the Dade period of the Yuan Dynasty (Yuan The joint mission that the three Sulu Dade Nanhai zhi 元 大 德 南 海 志 ) reports rulers organized in 1417 offers more that Foni 佛 坭 (Borneo) “administrated details for our study. The three rulers (guan 管)” various places in the Philippines. controlled a vast area ranging from the Palawan Islands in the northwest, the Sulu Islands, to the Kalimantan in the We read in Ming-dynasty sources southwest and southeast. about the power relations among various chiefdoms in the Philippines. The major aim of this delegation was to define the power relationship - Sanyu and Bajinong, for example, among the three rulers and between each had about one thousand the rulers and their respective households.Although they had no subordinates. “governance and subordination (tongshu 統屬)”relationship with one It therefore first regarded the three rulers as another, they all subordinated “temporarily in charge of (qüan 權 )” their (shu 屬 ) themselves to the ruler of chiefdoms. After weighing the situation, the Mayi, a powerful local magnet who court accorded the three rulers equal status by used as many as thirty people as granting them the same title “king” (guowang human sacrifices in his funeral 國王). The population and military strength - a move to keep the Sulu islands of a tribe determined its relations with politically divided, a situation that other chiefdoms. would best serve the Ming court’s self-interest. - The Pulilu tribesmen, for example, - The unstable positions of both Baduge were militant and prone to using force. Balabu and Dumahan seemed to have Depending on their own strength, they prompted the Western King of Sulu to sometimes maintained an “alliance” send an envoy to the Ming court in and at other times, a “subordination” 1420, merely three years after the joint relationship (lianshu 聯 屬 ) with mission in 1417. His envoy came Sanyu. alone, not as a member of a joint mission. balance of power in the Sulu Power relation region. And when power - Power relation among chiefdoms in relations evolved, rulers in Sulu Southeast Asia is not static. resorted to Chinese. - Chinese records reveal that chiefdoms in the pre-colonial Philippines did not exist in economic isolation. They employed unique methods and formed far-reaching networks when trading with each other and with China. Chinese records provide the historical context necessary for our understanding of recent archaeological excavations in the Philippines.