Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Making and Remaking
The Making and Remaking
The Making and Remaking
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42944448?
seq=1&cid=pdf- reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital
archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR,
please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms is collaborating
with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Shofar
JSTOR
This content downloaded from
210.13.81.57 on Mon, 18 Oct 2021 05:02:20 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
The Making and Re making of Literary History ♦ 69
Until ten to fifteen years ago, Jewish American literary history was construed and
described in overwhelmingly mid-twentieth-century masculine terms. As a corrective to
this longstanding trend, this essay undertakes to Mremake° Jewish American literary
history in feminist terms. First, in an act of 隹 minist "readerly resistance/ it surveys recent
efforts to remake the canon to include women writers and to reflect the experiences of
women readers. Then it applies a variety of second-and third-wave feminist interpretive
methodologies to readings of both classic and lesser-known works of Jewish American
literature, including Henry Roths Call it Sleep, Philip Roths The Ghost Writer, Emma
Lazarus'"The New Colossus/ Anzia Yezierskas MThe Lost Beautifulness,° Cynthia
Ozick's"Putter- messer and Xanthippe/ Jo Sinclairs, The Changelings, and Dara Horns In
The Image.
Sam Girgus, The New Covenant: Jewish Writers and the American Idea (Chapel Hill and
8
23Sylvia Barack Fishman, “The Faces of Women: An Introductory Essay/ in Sylvia Barack
Fishman, ed” Follow My Footprints: Changing Images of Women in American Jewish Fiction
(Hanover and London: Brandeis University Press, 1992), p. 2.
24In 1977, Irving Howe argued in the introduction to his anthology that American Jewish
fiction had "probably moved past its high point," insofar as the Jewish community had gone beyond
the immigrant experience, having become fully acculturated and assimilated into American life. Today
critics and editors such as SolotarofF and Rapoport reject that argument, contending that in recent
years Jewish American literature has been revitalized, building upon but also moving beyond the
themes of immigration, assimilation, and alienation to re-engage traditional and sacred Jewish sources,
themes, and issues, as well as to confront the issues surrounding the Holocaust and the State of Israel.
(See also Alvin Rosenfeld, °The Progress of the American Jewish Novel/ Response, Vol. 7 [1973]:
115130; S. Lillian Kremer,M Post-alienation: Recent Directions in Jewish-American Literature/
Contemporary Literature, Vol. 34, No 3 [Fall 1993]; and Andrew Furman, Israel Through the
American Literary Imagination [Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997].) At the forefront
of this process of revitalization are a group of women writers, including Cynthia Ozick, formerly
secular feminist activist writers such as Letty Cottin Pogrebin, Adrienne Rich, and Anne Roiphe, who
over the past decade have been re-examining their Jewish heritage, as well as others such as Allegra
Goodman, Rebecca Goldstein, and Nessa Rapoport, who, as Ted SolotarofF notes, , are anchored in
the present-day observant Jewish community and who are drawn to the intense and growing dialogue
between Jewish and modernity under the impact of feminism, the sexual revolution and the Holocaust/
See Ted SolotarofE HMarginality Revisited/ in Richard Siegel and Tamar Sofer, eds., The Writer in
the Jewish Community: An Israeli-North American Dialogue (Rutherford, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson
University Press, 1993), p. 64.
Louies Chametsky, John Felstiner, Hilene Flanzbaum, Kathryn Hellerstein, eds,, Jewish
American Literature: A Norton Anthology (New York: W W Norton, 2001).
l3
Patrocinio P. Schweickart/* Reading Ourselves: Toward a Feminist Theory of Read- ingf
in Elaine Showalter, ed., Speaking cf Gender (New York: Routledge, 1989), pp. 26-7.
l4
Schweikart,M Reading Ourselves/ p. 27.
15
Alfred Kazin, M
Introduction/ in Henry Roth, Call It Sleep (New York: Noonday Press,
1991), p. ix.
l6
Melvin J. Friedman, "Jewish Mothers and Sons: The Expense of Chutzpah," in Malin, ed.,
Contemporary Americanjewish Literature: Critical Essays, pp. 157-158.
2l
Lynn Akebrand/An American Messiah: Myth in Henry Roths Call It Sleep ; ' Modern
Fiction Studies, Vol. 35, No. 4 (Winter 1989): 678.
22
Altebrand/An American Messiah;' pp. 673-687.
23
Kazin, ° Introduction/ p. xx.
24
Sam Girgus, The New Covenant, p. 96.
28
Roth, The Ghost Writer, p. 106.
29
Roth, The Ghost Writer, p. 21.
32Jeffrey Rubin Dorsky/4 Philip Roths The Ghost Writer: Literary Heritage and Jewish
Irreverence/ Studies in American Jewish Literature, Vol. 8, No. 2 (1989): 179.
33Roth, The Ghost Writer, p. 28.
34Roth, The Ghost Writer, p. 170.
3533Roth, The Ghost Writer, p. 121.
36Sandra M. Gilbert and Susan Gubar, No Mans Land: Volume L The War of the Words (New
Haven: Yale University Press, 1989), p.128.
35
Roth, The Ghost Writer, p. 169.
^Schweickart, °Reading Ourselves/ p. 34.
olyn Heilbrun and Catherine Stimpson, dubbed critic X and Y, debated the end goal of
feminist criticism of literature, with critic X imagining a time, beyond the feminist
denunciation of patriarchal writing and interpretation, when the critical imagination
might cross the river into a "promised land for humanity the Egypt of female servitude
having been left behind?37 In a later essay Elaine Showalter later takes issue with
"critic X;' arguing against the idea of a Mfeminist pilgrimage to the promised land in
which gender would lose its power, in which all texts would be sexless and equal like
angels? According to Showalter, an advocate for the"gynocritical" study of the
specificity of womens writing and culture, we may never and may never want to reach
the Promised Land as understood by critic X as a realm of "serenely undifferentiated
uni- versality;0 Rather, Showalter argues, an examination of the distinctiveness of
womens writing indicates that it is "nor a transient by-product of sexism, but as a
fundamental and continually determining reality" Instead of looking forward to an
elimination of gender as a marker of difference in our culture, then, we may elect
through a study of womens culture to revel in the ^tumultuous and intriguing
wilderness of difference itself,38
The poetic career of American-born Emma Lazarus (1849-1887) is particularly
relevant to all of these aspects of feminist criticism, before and after "the promised
land," if you will Until recently; Lazarus literary contributions were largely forgotten,
and thus a reading of her work entails an exposure of the fissures in and biases of
masculinely constructed literary criticism and history; As a woman writer, Lazarus
also provides an occasion for the examination of the special history of Jewish womens
writing in America, A descendant of assimilated Sephardic Jews, Emma Lazarus had
already published four books by the time she was 28 years old, works of both poetry
and prose dealing mainly with Classical Greek and European subjects* It was not
until the early 1880s, with the news of the antijewish pogroms in Russia as well as
firsthand exposure to the Russian Jewish refugees at Wards Island in New York, that
Lazarus began to embrace her Jewish identity and turn her poetic attentions to Jewish
subjects. In 1882, Lazarus published Songs of a Semite, what one scholar of American
Jewish literature has called "rhe first important work of Jewish poetry in America? 39
By her untimely death in 1887, Lazarus had become an important literary and
polemical voice for the Jewish people, pleading the cause of Russian Jewish refugees,
calling in a series of essays entitled Epistle to the Hebrews for a rebirth of the Jewish
nation and the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine/ 0 In the words of one
of Lazarus eulogists, the famous abolitionist poet John Greenleaf Whittier, w [s] ince
Miriam sang of deliverance and triumph by the Red Sea, the Semitic race has had no
39
Allen Guttman, The Jewish Writer in America: Assimilation and the Crisis of Identity
(New York: Oxford University Press, 1971), p. 21.
^Epistle to the Hebrews was first published in serialized form in The American Hebrew in
fifteen sections between November 3, 1882 and February 23, 1883. These fifteen sections were
reprinted in 1987 with notes and an introduction by Morris U. Schappes (New York: Jewish
Historical Society).
4l
John G. Whittier/A Brave Singer;' The American Hebrew (December 9,; 1887): 3.
Edmund Stedman, 'A Contagious Inspiration in her Ardor," The American Hebrew
42
The Madwoman in the Attic that the traditional association of authorship with
masculinity afflicted the nineteenth-century woman writer with an “anxiety of
authorship*—a "radical fear that she cannot create, that because she can never
become a precursor/ the act of writing will destroy her? 39 Consequently; these
women writers developed various literary "swerves" in order to clear an
imaginative place for themselves in the masculine realm of literature, actively
seeking out a female precursors and employing poetics of "duplicity" so that their
literature could be read and appreciated even when its vital concern with female
dispossession and disease was ignored.40
Gilbert and Gubars theory of female literary creativity helps shed con*
siderable interpretive light on the gynocritical "specificity'' of Lazarus best known
poem, “The New Colossus/ which Lazarus was commissioned to write for a
campaign to raise money for the erection of rhe State of Liberty; To be sure,
Lazarus'"The New Colossus" offers a different portrait of the feminized Statue,
and by extension, America, than what we saw earlier in Roths Call It Sleep:
Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame, with conquering limbs astride from land to
land; Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand A mighty woman with torch,
whose flame Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name Mother of Exiles. From her
beacon-hand Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command The air-bridged
harbor that twin cities frame. “Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!” cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to
breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless,
tempest-tost to me, I Eft my lamp beside the golden door!""
39Sandra M. Gilbert and Susan Gubar, The Madwoman in the Attic (New Haven: Yale
University PRess, 1977), p. 49.
40Gilbert and Gubar, Madwoman, p. 72.
45
Emma Lazarus, The Poems of Emma Lazarus, Vol. II (Boston: Houghton Mifflin and Co.,
1889): pp. 202-3.
46
Esther Schor, Emma Lazarus (New York: Nextbook Schocken, 2006), p. 189. For more
on Lazarus see also Ranen Omer-Sherman, Diasporism and Zionism in Jewish American
Literature (Hanover and London: Brandeis University Press, 2002), pp. 15-67.
41See Judges 4: 4.
42See Jeremiah 31:14-16. Michael Kramer made this point about the biblical sources of Lazarus
Liberty in a paper presented at the 1998 AJS conference entitled, 0How Emma Lazarus Built the Statue
of Libertyf
43Diane Lichtenstein, Writing Their Nations: The Tradition of Nineteenth-Century American
Jewish Women Writers (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992), pp. 36-7.
44Dan Vogel gestures toward a similar reading oF'The New Colossus* in his brief and
lukewarm appraisal of the well-known poem. "It is not too much to say;" Vogel writes/that the sonnet
can stand as a kind of allegory of a literary spirit that itself yearned to break free but did not know
how, and finally learned what freedom really is” (Dan Vogel, Emma Lazarus [Boston: Twayne
Publishers, 1980], p. 159). For a more feminist appraisal of Lazarus work see Carole S. Kessner,
"Matrilineal Dissent: Emma Lazarus, Marie Syrkin and Cynthia Ozick," in Women of the Word:
Jewish Women and Jewish Writing (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1994), pp. 197-215.
5l
There are several reasons why Lacans re-reading of Freud has become influential in
French feminist theory; First is Lacans staunch anti-essentialism and anri-biologism, a critical
stance that allows for radical rejection of patriarchal definitions of the female self According to
Lacan, there is no such thing as an essential, predetermined identity or subjectivity; male, female,
or otherwise. Unlike Freud, who describes human development in fixed biological terms, for
Lacan, the Oedipus complex is a symbolic rather than a biological construct Unlike Freud, then,
Lacan makes a strong distinction between the penis, the male anatomical organ, and the phallus,
its representational symbol. As Diana Fuss explains, according to Lacan, the phallus is a
M
signifier, a privileged signifier of the Symbolic order which may point to the penis as the most
visible mark of sexual difference but nevertheless cannot be reduced to it." See Diana Fuss,
Essentially Speaking (New York: Routledge, 1989), p. 7.
45Helene Cixous, “Castration or Decapitation/ trans. Annette Kuhn, Signs, Vol. 7, No. 1
(Autumn 1981): 54.
Vol. 27, No. 2 ♦ 2009
have a sex organ? She has at least two of them, but they are not identifiable as ones.
Indeed she has many more. Her sexuality always at least double, goes even further: it
is plural... [Woman] is indefinitely other in herself This is why she is said to be
whimsical, incomprehensible, agitated, capricious... not to mention her language, in
which she sets off in all directions leaving him unable to discern the coherence of any
meaning. Hers are contradictory words, somewhat mad from the standpoint of reason,
inaudible for whoever listens co them with readymade grids, with a fully elaborated
code in hand.46
46"Luce Irigaray; This Sex Winch Is Not One, trans. Catherine Porter (Ithaca, NY: Cornell
University Press, 1985), pp. 28-9.
47Linda AlcofE°Cukural Feminism Versus Post-structuralism: The Identity Crisis in
Feminist Theory/ Signs, Vol. 13, No. 3 (1988): 417.
55
Anzia *zierska,"7he Lost Beautifulnessf in How I Found America (New York: Persea
Books, 1991), p. 35.
56*zierska,"The Lost Beautifulness/ p. 37.
This story; which starts with Hanneh Hayyehs creation of one refined form art
dedicated to the more conventional maternal/oedipal purpose of regaling her
beloved American-soldier son, culminates, then, with her creation of a completely
opposite form, a kind of female anti-art created from rude sharp edges of wood,
dark scorched panels of paint, a furious and frenzied display of uncontrolled rage.
This plot development is embodied in the three names assigned to Yezierskas
protagonist. The first name Hanneh allies her with the maternal, artistic, and
national aspirations of the biblical Hannah, who prayed for a son, composed
poetry upon his birth, and then sent him to Shiloh to undertake holy national
service as a servant to Eli the priesn Her second name Hayyeh, meaning both "she
lives" and "animal," seems to underscore the more primitive, physical, vital
aspects of her personality; while her last name, Saf- ransky, literally meaning "of
the book/ identifies her with literature or poetics. Hanneh Hayyehs white kitchen,
a symbol of her yearning for conventional maternal as well as economic/national
kinds of gratification, thus becomes a kind of blank slate against which she writes
a new living book. Yezierskas juxtaposition of notions of the maternal, the
animal, and the aesthetic, her bringing images of white-America, as represented
both by Mrs. Prestons linens and Hanneh Hayyehs painted kitchen, with counter-
images of raging, destructive blackness, is especially interesting in light of Helene
Cixous metaphorical description of feminine writing in her famous essay "The
Laugh of the Medusa," as a "dark continent/ 49 dangerous and destructive. "When
the repressed of their culture and their society returns/* Cixous writes, °it s an
explosive, utterly destructive, staggering return, with a force never yet unleashed
and equal to the most forbidding of suppressions/50 Hannah Safranskys destructive
rampage at the end of "The Lost Beautifulness, might be read as precisely this
kind of "staggering return"—an unleashing of a new artistic energy released from
repression.
Significantly; the passage describing the creation of this second work in-
cludes no dialogue, concentrating instead on melodramatic physical gestures,
evocative of the pre-Symbolic, pre-lingual stage of development, of the body and
the physical medium of dance. Over the course of the night, Hanneh Hayyeh
enacts a veritable dance of destruction, in which she seizes, scratches, breaks,
tears, unscrews, turns, blackens, rages, flings herself on the lounge, her nerves
quivering and her body aching. Hanneh Hayyeh does not revel in this second piece
of art work formed out of the remnants of the first. Like Yezier- ska herself this
ghetto artist never feels entirely comfortable falling back on images of woman as
uncontrollable, irrational, creatures of passion, and never entirely relinquishes her
desire to emulate (masculine) American-born style. And yet, even as she mourns
the lost beautifulness that she herself created and destroyed, she cannot help
noticing the vitality of her newly ruined kitchen. As in her essay w Mostly About
Myself* where Yezierska describes herself writing feverishly day and night in
order to create stories which are a M living picture of living people/ 60 Hanneh
Hayyehs feverish nocturnal rampage results in a remarkably vibrant expreission of
49Helene Cixous, "The Laugh of the Medusa," trans. Keith Cohen and Paula Cohen, in
Elaine Marks and Isabelle de Courtivron, eds., New French Feminisms (New York: Schock- en
Books, 1980), pp. 247-48. Cixous argues in this essay that it is impossible to define or limit the
feminine practice of writing. She does, however, offer various metaphorical descriptions of this
writing through images of darkness, the mother, the body, bisexuality and heterogeneity.
50Helene Cixous, "The Laugh of the Medusa," p. 256.
65
Wiseman, Crackpot, p. 1.
^Wiseman, Crackpot, p. 97.
69
Cynthia Ozick, M
Puttermesser and Xanthippe/ in Levitation (New York; E.P Dutton,
1983), p. 97.
70
Ozick,HPuttermesser and Xanthippe,Mp. 123.
71
Sarah Blacher Cohen, Cynthia Oziclts Comic Art: From Levity to Liturgy (Bloomington:
Indiana University Press, 1994), pp. 95-6.
initiates feminist interests and goals within discourse but constitutes the subject for
whom political representation is assumed.・.. [T]his prevailing conception has come
under challenge. The very subject of women is no longer understood in stable or
abiding terms?56 At the same time, post-feminist critics are aware that the complete
disavowal of identity is impossible, for that would lead to the opposing problem of *
undifferentiation? According to Jane Gallop, then/*[id]entity must be continually
assumed and immediately called into question?57
In Ozick's "Puttermesser and Xanthippe* this kind of construction and
deconstruction of identity occurs and recurs beginning with the story (or lack thereof)
of the golems creation. In contrast to the biblical story in Genesis 2, where Gods role
in creating Adam from the dust of earth is made very explicit, Ozick provides no
direct description of Ruth Puttermessers fashioning of her golem, leaving the real
origins of this creature ultimately uncertain. One mo* ment, Puttermesser is
fantasizing about a daughter who recites Goethe, and the next, the golem is lying there
in Puttermessers bed. Puttermesser does not recall making her. Where then has she
come from? What is her essence? Her nature? The golem has a female form, but is she
a woman? "It was true she [Puttermesser] had circled the bed. Was it seven times
around? It was true she had had blown some foreign matter out of the nose. Had she
blown some uncanny energy into the entrance of the dormant body? It was true she
had said aloud one of the names of the Creator/ 58 This passage suggests an adaptation
of various traditions. Puttermessers circling of the bed recalls the traditional wedding
ritual in which the bride circles the groom, signifying his future centrality to her self-
definition, while the number seven recalls the seven days of biblical Creation and the
primeval marriage of Adam and Eve in Eden; here,
however, instead of a bride circling a groom, a female creator figure encircles a
female golem, suggesting a female-centered revision of the divine creation plot in
which all male figures are excluded. Here the golem becomes Adam and Eve to God
Puttermesser; and yet, as Puttermesser*s circling of this golem/groom suggests, an
intertwining of identity is about to occur, whereby it will be difficult to identify the
creator from the created. On one level, this passage offers a meta-fictive commentary
on the unintentionality of (literary) creativity; It has indeed become a commonplace
for writers to speak of the characters they create taking on lives and careers of their
own; in these terms,w Puttermesser and Xanthippe0 is Ozicks own unwitting
offspring* On another level, Xanthippes uncertain origins introduces a theme of
unstable identities and relationships which continues in the narrative, even as
567 勺 udith Butler, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (New York:
Routledge, 1990), p.l.
57From Jane Gallop, The Daughters Seduction (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1982), p. xii.
Quoted in Diana Fuss, Essentially Speaking (New York: Routledge, 1989), p. 104.
58Ozick,Puttermesser and Xanthippe,0 p. 97.
autobiographical essay by Minnie Bruce Pratt entitled M Identity: Skin Blood Heart/62
Martin and Mohanty advocate a critical perspective which is , multiple and shifting/'
in which the critic "re-anchors herself repeatedly in each of the positions from which
she speaks, even as she works to expose the illusory coherence of these positions? 63 64
These various critical perspectives are particularly relevant to a reading of the
writing of lesbian writer Ruth Seid/Jo Sinclair (1913- ), especially her 1955 novel,
The Changelings, which opens as a Jewish community in Cleveland begins to
"defend" itself against the arrival of blacks in their neighborhood, provoking them to
reconsider their notion ofMat-homeness° in America. On the margins of the
neighborhood is The Gully; a liminal space, neither street nor park, where the
neighborhood kids congregate. In "the summer the Gully really belonged to Vincent
and her gang""—Vincent, an androgynous, last-name designation for Judy Vincent, a
young street-wise adolescent girl who dresses up as a boy and presides over the gang,
which meets regularly on Friday nights. As a tomboy who is not quite a boy ("She had
never actually called herself a boy; but neither had she ever thought of herself as one
of the girls she despised for their soft, plaintive weakness* 65), leading a gang of Jew-
ish and Italian kids that meets on Friday nights in a club house that "was big enough
to hold ten people0 (a minyan that is not quite a minyari), where they light candles
melted into two wine bottles (a Sabbath ritual that is not quite a Sabbath ritual) Judy
Vincent is a walking representation of the plural, shifting nature of identity and home.
For a long time Vincent had lived in a three separate worlds: one that was the gang-gully;
one was the street, one was Manny-Shirley [her nephew and intermarried sister]. There
were three levels of thinking and feeling in her, to match these separate worlds in which
she had moved so methodically; Rather suddenly; lately; her worlds had been jumping out
of their boundaries, fragments from one mixing confusingly with bits from the other two,66
At least this is the sort of identity that she has always naturally embraced, until her
street and her gang members, facing the specter of the "Schwartze” in their midst,
retrench and reassert more essentialist notions of religious and gender affiliation. In
one particularly chilling scene early in the novel, Vincents gang members turn on her
and fbrceably strip her naked to demonstrate that she is indeed a girt At that very
moment in the novel, however, Judy meets and befriends Clara, a similarly tomboyish
black girl from the other side of the gully; an encounter that demonstrates Judys
62Minnie Bruce Pratt s , 4 Identity: Skin, Blood Heart:" is part of a book co-authored by Pratt,
Elly Bulkin and Barbara Smith entitled Yours in Struggle: Three Feminist Perspectives on Anti-
Semitism and Racism (New York: Long Haul Press, 1984), pp. 11-63.
63Martin and Mohanty; p. 295. For another Jewish application of these ideas see Laura Levitt,
Jeu/s and Feminism: The Ambivalent Search for Hotne (New Tork: Routledge, 1997). See also Janet
Handler Burstein, Telling Little Secrets:American Jewish Writing Since the
641980s (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2006), pp. 76-115.
65吁。Sinclair, The Changelings (New York: Feminise Press, 1983), p. 3. "Sinclair, The
Changelings, p. 17.
66Sinclair, The Changelings, p. 12.
It Sleep, thereby providing a fitting coda for this feminist re-reading of Jewish
American literary history and criticism.
As mentioned earlier, the concluding sequence of Call It Sleep has David
Schearls escaping from his home with a milk ladle to the rail tracks, past the “old
wagon-yard, the lifted thicket of tongues; the empty stables, splintered runways,
chalked doors, the broken windows holding their glass like fangs in the sash,
exhaling manure-damp, rank. The last street lamp droning in a cyst of light. The
gloomy massive warehouse, and beyond it, the strewn chaos of the dump
stretching to the river?88 Horns final chapter re-enacts this same sequence with
Leora running against a backdrop of New York City urban blight, past
burned out factories and chemical swamps, past rail yards and landfills, past garbage
dumps and abandoned buildings, past rotting two-family houses and downed power
lines, past unused smokestacks and giant water towers, past empty streets, empty
buildings, empty houses, where not a single glowing window illuminated the dark
night.... In front of her, beckoning with a giant torch like a flare in a crime scene,
stood the Statue of Liberty;89
David Schearls journey reaches its climax when he plunges the dipper into tracks
and electrocutes himself knocking himself unconscious. Recalling Davids
moment of death and rebirth, Horns Leora plunges into the river; her visit to the
lost city however, serves to heighten rather than to erase her consciousness of
past choices and experiences. The lost city she plumbs
contains only things that we have truly abandoned, created exclusively out of what
we believe to be lost forever ... teeming and screaming and churning with all that was
have now forgotten, that it spills out over its walls, the wretched refuse of its teeming
shores pushing out in every direcrion until the walls surrounding its inner core
become little more than a technicality. In this underwater sanctuary; however, the
huddled masses all breathe free?90
After touring the city Leora departs not through its gates, but by springing herself
ofF the ocean floor and "projecting herself upward/—like the Statue of Liberty
herself Leoras visit to and departure from the lost city thus point to a desire to
supply new definitions of American liberty; as underscored by the explicit
allusions to Lazarus sonnet in the passage quoted above. If in Lazarus sonnet,
America offers immigrants the assimilationist opportunity to shed
88
Henry Roth, Call It Sleep, p. 408.
89
Dara Horn, In The Image, p. 271.
"Horn, In The Image, p. 273, emphasis added.
"For a fascinating discussion of the ways in which Dara Horns novel enacts "Gen~ der Trouble/
querying both masculine and feminine Jewish identities, see Helene Meyers, "Jewish Gender Trouble:
Women Writing Men of Valor/ Tulsa Studies in Womens Literature, Vol. 25, No. 2 (2006): 323-334.