LitRev Conclusion and Recommendation

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Conclusion:

This research review’s purpose is to help the reader understand the influence of stress of students on
psychological well-being. After our in-dept analysis using other research studies, it directed us to a
conclusion that stress is a common problem for students. In particular, female students are more
stressed than male. As a result, male students have a moderate or low level of stress. To avoid bias
and have even respondents, simple random sampling is used. For the demographic data analysis,
descriptive statistics were used as the statistical treatment. These key findings are extremely
concerning, as mental health is strongly linked to student well-being, academic outcomes and
retention. Therefore, this literature review provided positive coping strategies that is frequently used
by students such as religion, active coping, positive reinterpretation, planning, and use of
instrumental support, however religion was the most frequently used coping strategy.

Recommendation
Despite of positive coping strategies used by the student the stress prevalence is still higher from the
normal population. Perhaps, it will be interesting to explore on this matter in the future studies. We
recommend for future researchers, may also research the causes and consequences and how it
correlates to their academic performance. Furthermore, it would be of great value to the future
researchers to be able to determine the most effective coping strategies for students as well as how to
incorporate these strategies to the students learning style.

The purpose of this review is to determine the influence of stress on students’ psychological well-being
midst the COVID-19 pandemic . It is clear from the research reviewed that evaluative commentary is very
immersed and widely practiced throughout composition programs in today's universities. Along with
this, it is also clear that the field of composition studies just in regards to the types of commentary that
students receive on their writing is varied and continues to be studied and analyzed in order to most
benefit composition students and society at large. Corrective vs. evaluative commentary is still being
debated, though, and continues to be problematic in the discourse community of college compositionand
even high school writing as seen in Bardine et al.'s study. This field of inquiry is very important as at its
center is a concern with helping students become better writers. Helping students become better writers
and getting students to see the importance in growing as independent writers is also extremely
important in our current society with declining school budgets and liberal arts losing popularity and
funding.

You might also like