Difference between Digital Competencies among elementary teachers at cluster 2 when grouped

according to gender.

In general, Table 4a showed the result of T-test a difference in the Digital Competencies among
elementary teachers at cluster 2 when grouped according to gender.

The results revealed that there is no significant difference in perceived effects in the multimedia
presentation, considering gender, t-1.77, p< 0.05, Therefore the hypothesis was not rejected.

Result implied that the Digital Competencies among elementary teachers at cluster 2 implies that the
learning process is, in some degree, modified by actions of the learners, those changing the roles of both
the learners an d teachers states that, with all the additional capabilities of the growing number of
digital applications. (Barker and Tucker, 1990; ( Slawson 1993) (Brook 1993)

Table 4a.T-test of the digital competencies among elementary teachers when grouped according to
gender.

GENDER N Mean Mean df t sig

Difference
Male 17 4.54 0.26 116 1.77 0.799
Female 101 4.28

P<0.05 alpha level of significance (n.s)

Difference in the digital competencies among elementary teachers at cluster 2 when grouped according
to age.

Table 4b. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) result of the digital competencies among elementary teachers
at cluster 2 when grouped according to age, F= 2.266, p<0.05 therefore, the hypothesis was rejected

On the other hand, there was no significant difference in the digital competencies among elementary
teachers at cluster 2 from, F=2.266 p<0.05. Hence the hypothesis was not rejected.

This implies that digital competencies among elementary teachers at cluster 2 can enhance the scope
presentation in ways that similar to the roving association made by human mind (papert, 2009).
 Sum of df Mean square F Sig
squares
Between 2.10 3 700 2.266 0.85
Groups
Within Groups 35.24 114 309
Total 37.34 117

P<0.05 alpha level of significance (n.s)

Table 5. Cramers V result of digital competencies among elementary teachers at cluster 2 when grouped
according to length of service and rank.

Df Crameer’s Sig
Digital Competencies 2 0.129 0.375
and Length of Service
Digital Competencies 7 0.138 0.946
and Rank

P<0.05 alpha level of significance (n.s)

Chapter V

SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION S

This chapter presents the summary of findings conclusions and recommendations of the study.

Summary of Findings

This study aims to determine the digital competencies to technology integration among elementary
teachers at Cluster II. Specifically, this aims to answer the following: Socio demographic profile of the
respondents: to determine if there is significant difference in the level of digital competencies to
technology integration among elementary teachers at Cluster II when grouped according to age and
gender and if there is a significant relationship in the digital competencies among elementary teachers
at Cluster II when grouped according to length of service and rank. The researchers used the descriptive
correlational method. The instrument used in gathering data was a survey questionnaire which was
divided into two parts. Part I dealt with socio demographic profile of the respondents. Part II dealt with
the digital competencies in technology integration among elementary teachers at cluster II. Frequency
count. Percentage and mean where used to determine the socio demographic profile of the
respondents.