****PLEASE TYPE IN SCHOOL INFORMATION HERE:

SCHOOL INFORMATION

School
School Head
GAD Focal Person
Assessed By
Date Assessed
School Year Assessed

GUIDE FOR ANSWERING THE GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMEN

***Please Read Instruction Carefully***

1.     Each item is marked with specific scores representing (1) NO; (2) PARTLY YES; and (3) Y
indicating a score to signify the degree to which your organization has complied with the GAD

2.     Under the MOV/Remarks column, indicate/attach the means of verification required or prov
of your response. Failure to provide the appropriate MOVs could disregard/invalidate the “part
the organization.

3.     Scores per questionnaire to the GMEF Score Sheet will automatically transferred to the "SU

4.     To get the total score per entry point, add the sub-total scores per questionnaire and refer
scores to determine the organization’s level of GAD mainstreaming efforts:

Level Per Entry Point

5.     To get the overall level of the GAD mainstreaming efforts of the organization, add all the sc
to the following legend of scores to interpret the ratings:
 Over-all Level

6.   Organizations should take note of questions/descriptors with “NO” and “PARTLY YES” resp
or undertake activities to improve their score.

7.     The organization may re-administer the GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaires
time (e.g. every 3 years) to keep track of its GAD mainstreaming efforts.
CHOOL INFORMATION HERE:
SCHOOL INFORMATION

Lipit Integrated School

Jonathan D. Querijero
Fernando N. Abuan

Jonathan D. Querijero and Fernando N. Abuan

October 14, 2022

S. Y. 2021-2022

FOR ANSWERING THE GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRES

***Please Read Instruction Carefully***

s marked with specific scores representing (1) NO; (2) PARTLY YES; and (3) YES. Put an "X" in the column
re to signify the degree to which your organization has complied with the GAD element required.

MOV/Remarks column, indicate/attach the means of verification required or provide an explanation in support
e. Failure to provide the appropriate MOVs could disregard/invalidate the “partly yes” or “fully yes” scores of
n.

uestionnaire to the GMEF Score Sheet will automatically transferred to the "SUMMARY" sheet tab.
**** Please see Summary

otal score per entry point, add the sub-total scores per questionnaire and refer to the following legend of
mine the organization’s level of GAD mainstreaming efforts:

RANGES
0-7.99 points

8-14.99 points

15-19.99 points

20-23.99 points

24-25 points

verall level of the GAD mainstreaming efforts of the organization, add all the scores per entry point and refer
legend of scores to interpret the ratings:

RANGES
0-30.99 points
 31-60.99 points

61-80.99 points

81-95.99 points

96-100 points

s should take note of questions/descriptors with “NO” and “PARTLY YES” responses and design programs
tivities to improve their score.

ation may re-administer the GMEF Organizational Assessment Questionnaires after a specified period of
3 years) to keep track of its GAD mainstreaming efforts.
SESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRES

y***

S; and (3) YES. Put an "X" in the column

ith the GAD element required.

uired or provide an explanation in support

ate the “partly yes” or “fully yes” scores of

ed to the "SUMMARY" sheet tab.

re and refer to the following legend of

LEVEL DESCRIPTION
1: Foundation Formation
2: Installation of Strategic
Mechanisms
3: GAD Application
4: Commitment Enhancement and
Institutionalization
5: Replication and Innovation

add all the scores per entry point and refer

LEVEL DESCRIPTION
1: Foundation Formation
 2: Installation of Strategic
Mechanisms
3: GAD Application
4: Commitment Enhancement and
Institutionalization
5: Replication and Innovation

Y YES” responses and design programs

estionnaires after a specified period of

 GMEF SCORESHEET

Name of the Organization Assessed: Lipit Integrated School

School Head: Jonathan D. Querijero
Inclusive Period of Assessment: S. Y. 2021-2022

Key Areas Score

Policy
1. Issuance of initial policies on GAD 3.33
2. Issuance of policies to mainstream GAD in the
3.33
organization
3. Integration of GAD in the Organization’s Policies 4.17
4. Updating and Continuous Enhancement of GAD Policies 5.01
5. Model GAD Policy 2.5
Sub-Total: 18.34
Level for Policy 3
Level Description for Policy: GAD Application
People
1. On Establishing GFPS & GAD Champions/Advocates 0.41
2. On GAD Initiatives & Capacity Development Activities 2.05
3. GAD Sponsorship & Related Programs 3.72
4. GAD Champions as Program Implementers 2.06
5. GAD Experts 0
Sub-Total: 8.24
Level for People: 2
Installation of Strategic
Level Description for People:
Mechanisms
Enabling Mechanism
1. Setting up of Essential GAD Mechanisms 0
2. Functional GAD Mechanisms 2
3. Integration of GAD in the Organization’s Mechanisms 1
4. Advanced GAD Mechanisms 0
5. Model GAD Structures and Systems 0
Sub-Total: 3
Level for Enabling Mechanisms: 1
Level Description for Enabling Mechanism: Foundation Formation
Programs, Activities & Projects (PAPs)
1. Initial Activities to Faciitate GAD Mainstreaming 2.88
2. Establishing Commitment towards Gender
1.24
Mainstreaming
3. GAD Application 2.46
4. GAD Commitment and Institutionalization 2
5. Model Programs, Activities & Projects (PAPs) 2.48
Sub-Total: 11.06
Level for PAPs: 2
Installation of Strategic
Level Description for PAPs:
Mechanisms
OVER-ALL SCORE OF GAD MAINSTREAMING 40.64
LEVEL DESCRIPTION

Assessed By: Jonathan D. Querijero and Fernando N. Abuan

Date Assessed: October 14, 2022
 POLICY ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE
SCORE Score per item
DESCRIPTORS Partly Means of Verification/Remarks
No Partly Yes NO YES YES Answer

1. Issuance of Foundational Policies (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67)
1.1 Has the organization issued No Policy/policies Policy/policies
poliicies articulating support to policy/policiesNo articulating support articulating support Enumerate the GAD related policies issued (e.g., policy on
GAD mandates and policy/policies to GAD mandates to GAD mandates up GFPS or GAD Office; collection and maintenance of sex-
establishing the essential articulating support and establishing and establishing disaggregated database; conduct of organization-wide gender
elements of GAD Planning and to GAD mandates all four essential
Budgetting? (possible scores 0. and establishing elements of GAD Purpose/ Subject
0.83, and 1.67) essential elements Planning and Policy Title
x 1.67 Matter
of GAD planning Budgetting issued
and budgeting Establish School
Institutionalizing School
issued GAD Focal Point
GAD Focal Point System
System

1.2 Has the organization No policy reviewed Some existing Some existing Enumerate policies reviewed and/or re-issued/revised f
conducted a review of policies reviewed policies reviewed, consistency with new GAD issuances (e.g. policy reconstit
existing policies for but no new revised and re- GAD Focal Point System based on MC 2011-01, etc.).
consistency with emerging policies re-issued issued
and/ or revised
GAD issues? (possible
scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67) Title Type

x 0.83
Staff meeting staff meeting

Policy on establishing
staff meeting
GFPS

1.3 Has the organization No broad 1-2 broad 3 or more Enumerate broad statements issued in support of GAD
issued broad statements of statement statements broad statements activities/issues (e.g., memorandum for the organization to
intentions or aspirations supporting GAD- supporting GAD- supporting GAD- participate in Women’s Month activities, 18-day Campaign
reflecting its support for related activities related activities related activities VAW, etc).
issued issued issued
GAD- related activities?
(possible scores are 0, 0.83
and 1.67) x 0.83
1.3 Has the organization No broad 1-2 broad 3 or more Enumerate broad statements issued in support of GAD
issued broad statements of statement statements broad statements activities/issues (e.g., memorandum for the organization to
intentions or aspirations supporting GAD- supporting GAD- supporting GAD- participate in Women’s Month activities, 18-day Campaign
reflecting its support for related activities related activities related activities VAW, etc).
issued issued issued
GAD- related activities?
(possible scores are 0, 0.83
and 1.67) x 0.83 Title Type

Staff meeting staff meeting

Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 1 Policy) 3.33

2. Issuance of Policies to mainstream GAD in the Organization (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67)
2.1 Has the organization No policy 1-2 policies 3 or more policies List all policies issued by the organization related to ge
issued policies reflecting its reflectingthe reflecting the reflecting the mainstreaming (e.g. issuance of DOH department order to
interest for gender organization’s organization’s organization’s integrate GAD in all programs):
mainstreaming? (possible interest for gender interest for gender interest for gender
scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67) mainstreaming mainstreaming mainstreaming
issued issued issued

Title Type
x 0.83

Magna Carta for Women Republic Act

2.2 Has the organization
issued policies addressing the
gender needs of the clients
(internal and external)?
(possible scores are 0, 0.83
and 1.67)
Preparation on
Submission of GAD Plan
and Budget
No policy reflecting 1-2 policies 3 or more policies
gender needs of reflecting gender reflecting gender Enumerate all policies issued addressing gender needs
internal and/or needs of internal needs of internal internal and external clients of the organization (e.g. issua
external clients and/or external and/ or external policy for the establishment of a child-minding center for u
issued clients issued clients issued employees and clients with small children)

x 0.83
issued policies addressing the gender needs of reflecting gender reflecting gender
gender needs of the clients internal and/or needs of internal needs of internal
(internal and external)? external clients and/or external and/ or external
(possible scores are 0, 0.83 issued clients issued clients issued
and 1.67)

Title Type
x 0.83
ensure that all
child mapping learners ages 4-13
must be in school
Monitoring of
children from the
ECCD Program from
barangay premise to
Barangay
attend proper
schooling
2.3 Has the organization used Gender-fair Gender-fair Gender-fair Attach sample policy of the organization directing the use of gen
gender-fair language and language and language and language and language and polices as well as policies of the organization that
images in its policy issuances? images not yet images used in images used in all x 1.67 gender-fair language and images.
(possible scores are 0, 0.83 used in policy some policy policy issuances
and 1.67) issuances issuances

Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 2 Policy) 3.33 Child Prtection Policy

3. Integration of GAD in the Organization’s Policies (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67)
3.1 Has the organization No GAD Agenda/ GAD GAD Attach a copy of the GAD Agenda/ Strategic Framework o
adopted a GAD Strategic Agenda/Strategic Agenda/Strategic organization (or GAD Code, if LGU)*****PCW-MC-2018
Agenda/Strategic Framework Framework Framework
Framework? (possible formulated formulated but not formulated and x 1.67
adopted by adopted by
scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67)
management management

3.2 Has the organization
integrated GAD perspective
in its organizational and/ or
national/sectoral plan/s?
(possible scores are 0, 0.83
and 1.67)
GAD perspective GAD perspective GAD perspective Enumerate the organizational and/or national/ sectoral pla
not yet integrated integrated in integrated in all which GAD has been integrated (e.g. Philippine Developm
in organizational selected areas of areas of the Plan, Annual Budget Call or Gender-Responsive LGU Plan
and/ or national/ the organizational organizational as Comprehensive Development Plan for LGU) Organizati
sectoral plan/s and/ or and/or national/
Plans (e.g., Work Plan, Capacity Development Plan, Procu
national/sectoral sectoral plan/s
plan/s Plan; Sectoral Plan i.e. Youth Plan, Disaster Plan, Disabilit
etc.)

x 1.67
Title Type
GAD Plan and
BP 400
Budget
 x 1.67

GAD
BP 400A Accomplishment
Report

3.3 Has the organization
formulated
organizational/national/
sectoral policies on GAD?
(possible scores are 0, 0.83
and 1.67)
No organizational/ 1-2 organizational/ 3 or more Provide complete title of sector specific GAD policies issue
national/ sectoral national/ sectoral organizational/ Agency provision in the MCW i.e. CSC-Special Leave for W
policies on GAD policies on GAD national/sectoral DFA- establishment of Gender Focal Point Officer in Philip
issued issued policies on GAD Embassies and Consulates, GAD Code, RH Code and NA
issued
and attach copies if available.

Title Type
x 0.83

Child Protection Policy DepEd Order

Anti-Bullying Policy Republic Act

Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 3 Policy) 4.17

4. Updating and Continuous Enhancement of GAD Policies (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67)
4.1 Has the organization’s No gender gaps Gender gaps of Gender gaps of List down existing GAD policies of the organization and ho
GAD policy/policies resulted addressed by GAD either internal either internal bridged gender gaps of its internal and/or external clients (
in bridging gender gaps of policy/policies and/or external and/or external lowering and responding to the cases Violence against Wo
its clients (internal and clients are clients are
addressed by 1-2 addressed by 3 or
external)? (possible scores
GAD policies more GAD policies Title of GAD Policy Intended Client/
are 0, 0.83 and 1.67)
Issued Beneficiaries
1.67
Child Protection
x students
Policy
Anti-Bullying Policy students
VAWC Family
 x 1.67

Attach a copy of the policy assessment or Gender Impact

4.2 Has the organization
used the results of gender
analysis in the development
and/ or enhancement of
policies? (possible scores
are 0, 0.83, and 1.67)
Assessment conducted by the organization, if applicable.
Results of gender Results of gender Results of gender Enumerate enhanced policies, guidelines and/ or documen
analysis was not analysis used in analysis used in enhanced based on the results of gender analysis.
used in the the development the development
development and/or and/or
and/or enhancement of 1- enhancement of 3 Policy/ Guidelines
Gender Analysis
enhancement of 2 policies or more policies and/or Documents
Tools Used
policies Enhanced
x 1.67 Child Protection
students
Policy

Anti-Bullying Policy students

VAWC family/friends

4.3 Has the organization
integrated GAD perspective
in its Vision, Mission and
Goals? (possible scores are
0, 0.83, and 1.67)
GAD perspective GAD perspective GAD perspective Identify where GAD perspective is integrated in the Vision,
not yet integrated integrated in either integrated in the and/or Goals (VMG) of the organization.
in the Vision, the Vision, Mission Vision, Mission
Mission or Goals or Goals and Goals x 1.67

Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 4 Policy) 5.01

5. Model GAD Policies (max score: 5; for each item or question, 5)
5.1 Has the organization’s Other 1-2 organization/s 3 or more List down existing GAD policies used as a model or replica
GAD policies been used as organizations have have used the organizations have other organizations (e.g., GAD Agenda or Strategic Frame
model/standard by other not used the organization’s used the NGAs; Policy creating a Provincial GAD Office or GAD Co
organizations? (possible organization’s policy/ policies as organization’s LGUs)
policy/ policies as model/ standard policy/ policies as
scores are 0, 2.5 and 5)
model or standard model/ standard

x 2.5
5.1 Has the organization’s Other 1-2 organization/s 3 or more
GAD policies been used as organizations have have used the organizations have
model/standard by other not used the organization’s used the
organizations? (possible organization’s policy/ policies as organization’s
policy/ policies as model/ standard policy/ policies as
scores are 0, 2.5 and 5)
model or standard model/ standard

x 2.5 Organization/
Agency Adopting/
GAD Policy
Replicating the
Policy

Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 5 Policy) 2.5

TOTAL GMEF SCORE
(Policy)
18.34
 tion/Remarks

cies issued (e.g., policy on setting

d maintenance of sex-
ganization-wide gender

Date Issued

6-Sep-21

d/or re-issued/revised for

es (e.g. policy reconstituting the
MC 2011-01, etc.).

Purpose/ Date
Subject Matter Issued

review and plan

existing policies
for revision if there
is a need for
revision
review and plan
existing policies
for revision if there
is a need for
revision
sued in support of GAD related
m for the organization to
ities, 18-day Campaign on
sued in support of GAD related
m for the organization to
ities, 18-day Campaign on

Purpose/ Date
Subject Matter Issued

Re-iteration on the
plan for the
Womens' Month
Celebration

ganization related to gender

OH department order to

Purpose/ Date
Subject Matter Issued

to give details on
the
implementating
rules and
regulations

for
Implementation

ddressing gender needs of

organization (e.g. issuance of
ld-minding center for use of
hildren)
 Purpose/ Date
Subject Matter Issued

no children left
behind in basic
education

to identify children
for school
readiness

n directing the use of gender-fair

es of the organization that used

on Policy

Strategic Framework of the

)*****PCW-MC-2018

or national/ sectoral plan/s in

g. Philippine Development
r-Responsive LGU Plans such
an for LGU) Organizational
evelopment Plan, Procurement
Disaster Plan, Disability Plan

Date Issued
 cific GAD policies issued (e.g.
CSC-Special Leave for Women,
al Point Officer in Philippine
Code, RH Code and NAP WPS)

Purpose/ Date
Subject Matter Issued

Provide Special
Protection to
Students

Prevent and
Address bullying
in schools

he organization and how it

and/or external clients (e.g.
es Violence against Women

Gender Gaps
Addressed
threatened
child
bullying
women, children
ment or Gender Impact
nization, if applicable.
elines and/ or documents
ender analysis.

Remarks

addressed
threatened
child

addressed bullying

women, children
are free from
violence
ntegrated in the Vision, Mission
ation.

ed as a model or replicated by
nda or Strategic Framework for
GAD Office or GAD Code for
Remarks
 POLICY ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTION
SCORE Score per item
DESCRIPTORS Partly
No Partly Yes NO YES YES

1. On the Establishment of GFPS & GAD Champions/Advocates (max score: 5; for each item or question, .0
1.1 Has the organization The organization Some members Majority of the
designated people in has yet to of the GFPS members of the
strategic positions as identify key occupy strategic GFPS occupy
members of its GAD Focal people to be positions in the strategic
Point System (GFPS)? members of its organization positions in the
(possible scores are 0, 0.41, GFPS organization x
and 0.83)

1.2 Have the organization’s GFPS members GFPS members GFPS members
GAD Focal Point System have not attended 1-2 attended all three
(GFPS) members attended attended any of basic GAD basic GAD
appropriate and relevant the basic GAD training training
training on GAD? (possible training
scores are 0, 0.41, and x
0.83)

1.3 Has the organization’s Top Only selected All top

top management attended management has members of the management
Basic GAD Orientation or not yet attended top management officials have
Gender Sensitivity Training Basic GAD attended Basic attended Basic
(GST)? (possible scores are Orientation or GAD Orientation GAD Orientation
0, 0.41, and 0.83) GST or GST or GST x

1.4 Have the organization’s Less than 50% of 50-99% of the 100% of the
staff members been oriented the organization’s organization’s
on GAD? (possible scores organization’s staff members staff members
are 0, 0.41, and 0.83) staff members have attended have attended
have attended Basic GAD Basic GAD x
Basic GAD Orientation or Orientation or
Orientation or GST GST
GST
1.5 Are the organization’s Top Some GFPS Some top
top management and GAD management has members are management
Focal Point System (GFPS) not yet attended aware and and all GFPS
members aware and Basic GAD conscious of members are
conscious of GAD-related Orientation or GAD-related aware and
policies and mandates? GST policies and conscious of x
(possible scores are 0, 0.41, mandates GAD-related
and 0.83) policies and
mandates

1.6 Does the organization’s top Top management Top management Top management
management allow staff does not allow allows only the allows all key
members to participate in GAD- staff members to GFPS members to officials, GFPS
related activities? (possible participate in GAD- participate in GAD- members and staff
scores are 0, 0.41, and 0.83) related activities related activities members to
participate in GAD-
related activities x

Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 1 People)

2. GAD Initiatives & Capacity Development Activities (max score: 5; for each item: 0.83)
2.1 Does the top Top Top Top
management direct the management management management
implementation of the GAD does not direct approves GPB approves GPB
Plan and Budget (GPB) of GPB but not visible and attends
the organization? (possible implementation during critical /
scores are 0, 0.41, and critical/significant significant GAD x
0.83) GAD activities activities

2.2  Are program Program Only selected All program

implementers trained on implementers not program implementers are
gender analysis (GA) and yet trained on implementers are trained on GA
the use of gender analysis GA and use of trained on GA and use of GA
(GA) tools? (possible scores GA tools and use of GA tools
are 0, 0.41, and 0.83) tools
x

2.3  Are concerned staff Concerned staff members are Concerned staff
members trained in the members are not trained in the members are
importance of collecting sex- yet trained in the importance of trained in the
disaggregated data (SDD) importance of collecting SDD importance of
and gender statistics? collecting SDD and gender collecting SDD x
(possible scores are 0, 0.41, and gender statistics and gender
and 0.83) statistics statistics, and
are collecting
them
and gender statistics? collecting SDD and gender collecting SDD x
(possible scores are 0, 0.41, and gender statistics and gender
and 0.83) statistics statistics, and
are collecting
them

2.4  Are male employees Male employees Male employees Male employees
involved and appreciative of do not participate participate in the initiate and
the organization’s GAD in the organization’s participate in the
PAPs? (possible scores are organization’s GAD PAPs organization’s
0, 0.41, and 0.83) GAD PAPs GAD PAPs
x

2.5 Are clients (internal and Clients are not Either internal or Both internal and
external) aware of the GAD yet oriented on external clients external clients
efforts of the organization? the GAD efforts are oriented on are oriented on
(possible scores are 0, 0.41, of the the GAD efforts the GAD efforts
and 0.83) organization of the of the
organization organization

2.6 Are the clients (internal Clients (internal

Either internal or Both internal and
and external) able to and external) are
external clients external clients
articulate their gender not able to are oriented on are able to
needs/issues in the articulate gender
the GAD efforts articulate gender
development of the needs/issues inof the issues/needs in
organization’s GAD PAPs? the developmentorganization the development x
(possible scores are 0, 0.41, of the external clients of the
and 0.83) organization’s are able to organization’s
GAD PAPs articulate gender GAD PAPs
issues/needs in
the development
Sub-total GMEF Score
of the (Level 2 People)
3. GAD Sponsorship & Related Programs (max score: 5; for each item: .83)
organization’s
3.1 Does the top No initial With
GAD initial
PAPs Top
management direct the discussion discussion management
integration of GAD among top among top issued directive/s
perspective in the management management to integrate GAD
organization’s officials on the officials perspective in
programs/activities/ projects integration of regarding the
(PAPs) and performance GAD perspective integration of organization’s
indicators? (possible scores in the GAD perspective PAPs and
are 0, 0.41, and 0.83) organization’s in the performance x
PAPs and organization’s indicators
performance PAPs and
indicators performance
indicators
3.2 Are the GFPS members GFPS members Either GFPS Both the GFPS
and program implementers and program members or members and
able to integrate GAD implementers are program program
perspective in the not yet able to implementers are implementers are
development of the integrate GAD able to integrate able to integrate
organization’s perspective in GAD perspective GAD perspective
programs/activities/ projects the development in the in the x
(PAPs)? (possible scores of the development of development of
are 0, 0.41, and 0.83) organization’s the the
PAPs organization’s organization’s
PAPs PAPs

3.3 Are concerned staff Concerned staff Concerned staff Concerned staff
members able to utilize sex members are not members utilize members utilize
disaggregated data (SDD) and/ yet able to utilize SDD and/ or SDD and/ or
or gender statistics for gender SDD and/ or gender statistics gender statistics
analysis 9GA) to enhance the gender statistics for GA for GA and
organization's GAD PAPs? for GA recommend
(posibble acores are 0, 0.41, strategies to x
and 0.83) enhance the
organization's GAD
PAPs

3.4 Does the top management Top management Top management Top management
support the appointment of does not appoint appoints women appoints women
qualified women staff women to to leadership to leadership
members to leadership leadership positions but position and
positions? (possible scores are positions. provides limited provides full
0, 0.41 and 0.83) supports support x

3.5 Do women assume critical Women occupy Women occupy Women occupy
roles and authority in the less than 50% of less that 50% of 50% or more of
organization? (possible scores the third level, third level the third level
are 0, 0.41, and 0.83) middle positions but positions in the
management and comprise 50% or organization.
technical positions more of the
in the organization middle
management and x
technical positions
in the organization

3.6. Are the clients (internal No client Either internal or Both internal and
and external), able to (internal and external clients external clients
participate in the planning external) participate in the participate in the
and implementation of the involvement in planning and planning and
organization’s GAD PAPs? the planning and implementation implementation
(possible scores are 0, 0.41, implementation of the of the x
and 0.83) of the organization’s organization’s
organization’s GAD PAPs GAD PAPs
GAD PAPs
3.6. Are the clients (internal No client Either internal or Both internal and
and external), able to (internal and external clients external clients
participate in the planning external) participate in the participate in the
and implementation of the involvement in planning and planning and
organization’s GAD PAPs? the planning and implementation implementation
(possible scores are 0, 0.41, implementation of the of the x
and 0.83) of the organization’s organization’s
organization’s GAD PAPs GAD PAPs
GAD PAPs

Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 3 People)

4. GAD Champions as Program Implementers (max score: 5; for each item: 0.83)
4.1 Are the GAD Focal Point GFPS members Less than 50% of 50% or more of
System (GFPS) members are not yet the GFPS the GFPS
able to serve as GAD serving as members are members are
resource persons within the resource persons serving as GAD serving as GAD
organization, including its on GAD within resource persons resource persons
regional offices and attached the organization within the within the
x
agencies? (possible scores organization organization
are 0, 0.41 and 0.83)

4.2 Does the top No initial With initial Top

management direct the discussion discussion management
monitoring of the among top among top issued directive/s
organization’s GAD PAPs? management management to monitor the
(possible scores are 0, 0.41 officials on the officials on the organization’s
and 0.83) monitoring of the monitoring of the GAD PAPs x
organization’s organization’s
GAD PAPs GAD PAPs

4.3 Are concerned staff Concerned staff Concerned staff Concerned staff
members able to adjust members not members able to members able to
GAD PAPs to address able to adjust identify emerging identify and
emerging gender issues? GAD PAPs to gender issues adjust GAD
(possible scores are 0, 0.41 address but are not PAPs to address
and 0.83) emerging gender capable of emerging gender x
issues addressing them issues

4.4 Do top management GAD is not GAD reflected in GAD reflected in

and concerned staff reflected in the the performance the performance
members reflect GAD performance contracts or contracts or
functions in their contracts or TORs of either TORs of both top
performance contracts or TORs of both top top management management or
terms of reference (TORs)? management or concerned concerned staff x
(possible scores are 0, 0.41 and concerned staff members members
and 0.83) staff members

4.5 Are concerned staff Concerned staff Concerned staff Concerned staff
members able to develop members not yet members members
tools and/or knowledge able to develop develop GAD develop GAD
products (KPs) on GAD? GAD tools and tools and KPs on tools and KPs on
(possible scores are 0, 0.41 KPs on GAD GAD with GAD on their
and 0.83) assistance from own x
external GAD
experts/resource
persons
4.5 Are concerned staff Concerned staff Concerned staff Concerned staff
members able to develop members not yet members members
tools and/or knowledge able to develop develop GAD develop GAD
products (KPs) on GAD? GAD tools and tools and KPs on tools and KPs on
(possible scores are 0, 0.41 KPs on GAD GAD with GAD on their
and 0.83) assistance from own x
external GAD
experts/resource
persons

4.6 Are clients (internal and No participation Either internal or Both internal and
external) able to participate from clients in all external clients external clients
in 3 or more levels of the levels of the have participated have participated
development planning cycle development in 1-2 levels of in all levels of the
of the organization’s GAD planning cycle of the development development
PAPs? (possible scores are the planning cycle of planning cycle of x
0, 0.41 and 0.83) organization’s the the
GAD PAPs organization’s organization’s
GAD PAPs GAD PAPs

Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 4 People)

5. GAD Experts (max score: 5; for each item, 1.67)
5.1 Does the top Top Top Top
management raise GAD management has management is management is
concerns during high-level not raised GAD able to raise able to raise and
meetings/ discussions? (e.g. concerns during GAD concerns receive support
Cabinet cluster meeting, high- level during high-level on GAD
international conferences) meetings meetings concerns from
(possible scores are 0, 0.83 colleagues x
and 1.67) during high-level
meetings

5.2 Are the organization’s Staff members Staff members Staff members
staff members recognized not yet tapped by recognized as recognized as
as GAD experts by other other GAD experts and GAD experts and
organizations? (possible organizations tapped by 1-4 tapped by 5 or
scores are 0, 0.83 and 1.67) organizations more
organizations x

5.3 Are external clients of External clients External clients External clients
the organization recognized not yet received received awards
as GAD champions by recognized for nominations or for their gender
reputable local, national and their gender have shortlisted mainstreaming
international organizations? mainstreaming and/or cited in efforts from
(possible scores are 0, 0.83 efforts their respective reputable local,
and 1.67) localities for their national and
gender international
mainstreaming organizations x
efforts by
reputable local,
national and
international
organizations
reputable local, national and their gender have shortlisted mainstreaming
international organizations? mainstreaming and/or cited in efforts from
(possible scores are 0, 0.83 efforts their respective reputable local,
and 1.67) localities for their national and
gender international
mainstreaming organizations x
efforts by
reputable local,
national and
international
organizations

Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 5 People)

TOTAL GMEF SCORE
(People)
ESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE
Score per item
Means of Verification/Remarks
Answer

ch item or question, .083)

If yes, provide details on the policy formalizing the
creation/reconstitution of the organization’s GAD Focal Point
System (GFPS) and attach a copy for validation.
If no, explain why the organization has not designated people
in strategic positions as members of its GAD Focal Point System
0.41 (GFPS)?
*Majority is defined at least 50%+ 1 of all GFPS members
as per SO, AO, DAO or policy creating/reconstituting the GAD
Focal Point System of the organization

List down basic GAD training attended by GAD Focal Point

System members (e.g. Gender Sensitivity Training (GST),
Gender Analysis (GA) and GA Tools and GAD Planning and
Budgeting).

0.41
Title of GAD Trainer/
Number of
Institutional Date
Participants
Training Provider

List down top management official/s who attended Basic GAD

Orientation/Gender Sensitivity Training (GST)

Basic GAD
0 Name of Top Orientation/ Institutional/
Management GST Training Date
Official Provider
Attended

Attach attendance sheets of all Basic GAD Orientations or

Gender Sensitivity Training (GST) conducted/attended by the
organization’s staff members.

0
 If yes, explain how the top management and GFPS members
manifest awareness and consciousness of GAD-related policies
and mandates (e.g. top management approves and directs
implementation of GPBs, attends GAD-related activities, allows
staff to participate in GAD-related activities, supports
0 appointment of qualified women to management positions, etc.)

Attach copies of policies issued by top management allowing

staff members to participate in GAD-related activities (e.g. office
orders, travel orders, department orders, executive orders,
admin memos, etc.) or accomplish the table below:

0
GAD-related
Participants Organizer Date
Activity

0.41
3)
Cite critical incidents of top management directing the
implementation of the organization’s GPB (e.g. presence or
participation during the setting of GAD agenda, strategic
planning on GAD, etc.)
Attach relevant documents indicating
0.41 support of top management to the implementation of the GAD
Plan and Budget of the organization(e.g. attendance sheet, copy
of Opening/Closing Remarks during GAD training, photos taken
during GAD training, etc.)

Enumerate training on Gender Analysis (GA) and Gender

Analysis (GA) Tools attended by program implementers.

Title of GA Trainer/
Participants Date
Training Provider
0.41

Attach training design and attendance sheets of Gender

Analysis and GA Tools training attended by program
implementers.
List down trainings conducted for concerned staff members on
the importance of collecting sex- disaggregated data and gender
statistics.

0
Date
Title of Training Participants
Conducted
 0

Provide list of the organization’s PAPs initiated and/or

participated by male employees:

Type of
Involvement of
GAD PAPs Participants
Male
0.41 Employees

staff meeting member all staff

*Type of Involvement of Male Employees: as participants, organizers and/or resource

persons in the conduct of the organization’s GAD efforts
If yes, identify efforts to orient clients on the GAD efforts of the
organization (e.g. PCW website, news, GAD corner in the
organization, social media (FB, Twitter), among others.

Targeted Date
Activity
Audience Conducted
0.41

Also attach results of assessments or surveys conducted to

measure awareness of clients (internal and external) on the
GAD efforts of the organization, if applicable.

Attach documentation of consultations/ meetings (e.g. survey,

focus group discussions, key informant interviews) and list of
issues raised by clients (internal and external) during
consultations, etc.
0.41

2.05

Attach directive/s issued by top management to integrate GAD

perspective in the organization’s program/activities/projects
(PAPs) and performance indicators.

0.41
 Enumerate organization programs/activities/ projects (PAPs)
and performance indicators integrated with GAD perspective by
GFPS members and program implementers.

0.41
Purpose/
Responsible Unit Type Subject Date Issued
Matter
GFPS
Program
Implementers
If yes, explain how concerned staff members utilise sex-disaggregated
data and / or gender statistics for gender analysis to enhance the
organization's GAD PAPs.

0.83
Type of SDD/ P/A/P where GAD Efforts
Gender Statistics SDD was Applied Enhanced

enrollment feeding program

share a joy
program
Attached documents issued by top management supporting the
appointment of qualified women staff members in leadership position
(e.g. department order or executive orders, list of trainings available,
documentation of mentoring activities, etc.)
0.83

Identify the number of employee in the following positions:

Position No. of Men No. of Women % of women

Top Management
0.83 (SH) 1

Middle
Management 1 10
(Teachers)

Technical Staff
(both clerical and 2
janitorial)
If yes, describe how clients (internal or external) participate in
the planning and implementation of the organization’s GAD
PAPs.

0.41
0.41 Attach documents showing external clients’ membership in the
technical working groups (TWGs) and project management
offices (TWGs) as well as attendance sheets and documentation
of meetings participated by internal and external clients.

3.72

Attach list and profile of the GFPS members including the GAD-
related training conducted.

Name of
Name of GFPS Office/Unit,
Title of GAD
0.41 Member who Regional Date
Activities
served as GAD Office and/ or Conducted
Conducted
Resource Person Attached
Agency

Attach copies of directive/s issued by top management

regarding the monitoring of the organization’s GAD PAPs as well
as monitoring reports, as applicable.

List down GAD PAPs calibrated to address emerging gender

issues.

Unit/
Emerging
Title of Adjusted Concerned
Gender Issues
0.83 GAD PAPs Staff
Addressed
Responsible

Attach sample of Terms of Reference (TORs), Performance

Contract, Individual Performance Commitment and Review
(IPCR) forms of staff members and Career Executive Service
Performance Evaluation System (CESPES) of top management
officials of the organization
0

Please provide details of tools and/or knowledge products (KPs)

on GAD developed.

0.41
 Name and
Designation
GAD Tools
of GAD
and/or KPs Purpose
0.41 experts
Developed
tapped for
assistance

If yes, describe the participation of internal and/or external

clients in the development planning cycle (planning,
implementation and management, monitoring and evaluation) of
the organization’s GAD PAPs.

0.41

2.06

Attach documentation of meetings and/or discussions where

GAD concern/s was/were raised by the organization’s top
management.

Name of Top Name of

GAD Concerns
Management Person who
Meeting/ Discussion Discussed/
0 who Raised Supported the
Raised
GAD Concern GAD Concern

Attach list and profile of internal GAD experts. Enumerate

seminars/conferences/training facilitated by internal GAD
experts for other agencies and organizations.

0 Name of In- ternal

Title of GAD Name of
Date
Activities Inviting
GAD Expert Conducted
Conducted Organizations

Awards/ Organization Date

Citations/ Conferring the Conferred
Nominations Award/
Received Citation

0
0 Attach copies of news articles, other write-ups or
documentation (e.g. TV interviews) regarding gender
mainstreaming efforts of the external clients of the
organization, if applicable.

8.24
 GMEF ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE - EN
SCORE Score per item
DESCRIPTORS Partly
NO YES
No Patly Yes YES

1. Setting up of Essential GAD Mechanisms (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.67)
1.1 Has the organization GFPS not GFPS or similar GFPS or similar
created/ reconstituted its GAD created/ GAD mechanism GAD mechanism
Focal Point System (GFPS) in reconstituted in created/ created/
accordance with Magna Carta of accordance with reconstituted in reconstituted in
Women Implementing Rules and MCW IRR Sec the central office the central office
Regulations (MCW IRR) Sec. 37-C and and/ or selected and all regional
37-C and other pertinent policies pertinent policies regional and/or offices and
issued by oversight agencies? issued by attached attached
(possible scores are 0, 0.83, and concerned agencies/offices agencies
1.67) oversight only
agencies

1.2 Has the organization No exploratory Organization Organization

initiated exploratory activities activities initiated conducted initial initiated
with the Philippine Commission at all meetings/ exploratory
on Women (PCW) or other consultations activity/activities
agencies/LGUs, institutions with PCW, with PCW,
and/or individuals to facilitate organizations organizations
gender mainstreaming? and/or and/or
(possible scores are 0, 0.83 & individuals to individuals to x
1.67) facilitate gender facilitate gender
mainstreaming mainstreaming

1.3 Has the organization No information Data and Intake forms

collected information towards collected information developed and
the establishment of sex- collected but are used to collect
disaggregated database and not yet sex-
enhancement of its M&E disaggregated by disaggregated x
system? (possible scores are 0, sex data or gender
0.83, and 1.67) statistics

Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 1 Enabling Mechanisms)

2. Functional GAD Mechanisms (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1)
2.1 Does the organization have No functional GFPS GFPS members
a functional GAD Focal Point GFPS based on performing actively
System based on the provisions the provisions of limited functions performing all the
of the guidelines issued by the guidelines based on the functions based
relevant oversight agencies? issued by provisions of the on the provisions
(e.g. PCW MC 2011-01 for relevant guidelines issued of guidelines
NGAs, JMC 2013-01 for LGUs oversight by relevant issued by
and CHED MO 2015- 01 for agencies oversight relevant
SUCs) (possible scores are 0, 0. agencies oversight
5 and 1) agencies

2.2 Has the organization No other GAD 1 other GAD 2 or more other
established other GAD mechanism mechanism GAD
mechanisms? (possible scores established established mechanisms
are 0, 0. 5 and 1) established

*Other GAD Mechanisms refer to those

in addition to the GFPS and the GAD
Database
x

2.3. Has the organization utilized No GAD budget Organization Organization

at least 5% of its budget* to utilized utilized less than utilized 5% or
implement GAD PAPs? 5% of total more of total
(possible scores are 0, 0. 5 and budget to budget to
1) implement GAD implement GAD x
PAPs PAPs

*refers to the total GAA of NGAs

and LGUs or COB for GOCCs
2.4. Has engagement with Organization has Organization has Organization has
organizations such as PCW, not engaged with sporadice established
LGUs and/or other agencies, agencies/ LGUs, ngagement with working
and individuals been established institutions agencies/LGUs, engagement with
towards the conduct of GAD- and/or institutions agencies/LGUs,
related PAPs of the individuals and/or institutions
organization? (possible scores towards the individuals and/or
are 0, 0. 5 and 1) conduct of GAD- towards the individuals
x
related PAPs conduct of GAD- towards the
related PAPs conduct of GAD-
related PAPs
 related PAPs conduct of GAD-
related PAPs

2.5. Is the organization able to No effort from Organization is in Organization is

collect or generate sex- the organization the process of collecting and
disaggregated data (SDD) yet to collect or collecting or generating SDD
and/or gender statistics*? generate SDD generating SDD and/or gender
(possible scores are 0, 0. 5 and and/or gender and/or gender statistics x
1) statistics statistics

Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 2 Enabling Mechanisms)

3. Integration of GAD in the Organization’s Mechanisms (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1)
3.1 Do the organization’s other Other GAD Other GAD Other GAD
GAD mechanisms coordinate, mechanisms mechanisms mechanisms
monitor and report the progress established but coordinate and coordinate,
of the implementation of its not functional monitor progress monitor and
functions? (possible scores are of generate status/
0, 0.5 and 1) implementation progress report x
but do not of
generate implementation
status/progress
report

3.2 Has the organization utilized Organization Organization Organization

30% or more of its total budget* utilized 5% or utilized 6-29% of utilized 30% or
to implement GAD PAPs? less of total total budget to more of total
(possible scores are 0, 0.5 and budget to implement GAD budget to
1) *refers to the total GAA of NGAs and implement GAD PAPs implement GAD x
LGUs or COB for GOCCs PAPs PAPs

3.3 Has the organization With AOM With AOM With AOM
judiciously utilized its GAD indicating non- indicating non- commending the
budget to implement GAD utilization of at utilization of atjudicious use of
activities based on its GPB? least 5% of its least 5% of its GAD funds or no
(possible scores are 0, 0.5 and budget for GAD budget for GAD AOM from COA x
1) or Notice of with acceptable indicating non-
Disallowance justification from
utilization of at
from COA with the organization least 5% of its
no justification budget for GAD
3.4 Has the organization Has
from not
the Partnered with 1 Partnered with 2
partnered with agencies/ LGUs, partnered
organizationwith organization or more
institutions and/or individuals other towards the organizations
towards the strategic organizations strategic towards the
implementation of its GAD towards the implementation strategic
PAPs? (possible scores are 0, strategic of GAD PAPs implementation
0.5 and 1) implementation of GAD PAPs
of GAD PAPs
x
0.5 and 1) implementation of GAD PAPs
of GAD PAPs
x

3.5 Is the organization utilizing No SDD or SDD and/or SDD and/or

sex- disaggregated data and/or gender statistics gender statistics gender statistics
gender statistics in the utilized in the utilized in 1-2 utilized in all
development planning cycle development stages of the stages of the
(planning, implementation and planning cycle development development
management and monitoring planning cycle planning cycle x
and evaluation)? (possible
scores are 0, 0.5 and 1)

Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 3 Enabling Mechanisms)

4. Advanced GAD Mechanisms (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1)
4.1 Are the organization’s other Other GAD Other GAD Other GAD
GAD mechanisms able to mechanisms are mechanisms are mechanisms are
contribute towards the fully functional fully functional fully functional
attainment of its desired but still has to and contributing and resulted in
impact/s? (possible scores are contribute to the to the attainment desired impact/s
0, 0.5 and 1) attainment of of desired x
desired impact/s impact/s

4.2 Has the organization utilized Organization Organization Organization

70% or more of its total budget* utilized 30% or utilized 31-69% utilized 70% or
to implement GAD PAPs? less of total of total budget to more of total
(possible scores are 0, 0.5 and budget to implement GAD budget to
1) *refers to the total GAA of implement GAD PAPs implement GAD
NGAs and LGUs or COB for PAPs PAPs
GOCCs

4.3 Is the organization’s Database has no Database with Database with

database with sex- SDD and/or SDD and/or SDD and/or
disaggregated data and/or gender statistics gender statistics gender statistics
gender statistics able to and is not able to utilized in 1-2 utilized in all
generate sector- specific generate sector- stages of the stages of the
knowledge products (KPs) on specific KPs on development development
GAD? (possible scores are 0, GAD planning cycle planning cycle
0.5 and 1)
4.4 Is the organization’s M&E M&E system is M&E system M&E system
system able to track the desired not able to track able to track able to track
gender-related impacts of its gender- related gender- related gender- related
GAD PAPs on clients (internal impacts of GAD impacts of GAD impacts of GAD
and external)? (possible scores PAPs on clients PAPs on either PAPs on both
are 0, 0.5 and 1) (internal and internal or internal and
external) external clients external clients

4.5 Does the organization have KM system does KM system has KM system has
a Knowledge Management (KM) not have GAD- GAD-related KPs GAD-related KPs
System with GAD- related related KPs accessed and accessed and
knowledge products (KPs)? utilized by either utilized by both
(possible scores are 0, 0.5 and internal or internal and
1) external clients external clients

Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 4 Enabling Mechanisms)

5. Model GAD Structures and Systems (max score: 5; for each item or question:1)
5.1 Has the organization’s GAD GFPS not yet GFPS GFPS awarded
Focal Point System been recognized as nominated, as model GAD
recognized or awarded as a model GAD shortlisted or mechanism by
model GAD mechanism by mechanism by cited as model reputable
reputable local, national, and reputable GAD mechanism organizations on
international organizations on organizations on by reputable gender
gender mainstreaming? gender organizations on mainstreaming
(possible scores are 0, 0.5 and mainstreaming gender
1) mainstreaming

5.2 Has the organization’s other Other GAD Other GAD Other GAD
GAD mechanisms been mechanisms not mechanisms mechanisms
recognized as models by other yet recognized recognized as recognized as
organizations? (possible scores by other models by 1-2 models by 3 or
are 0, 0.5 and 1) organizations as organizations more
models organizations
5.3 Has the organization utilized Organization Organization Organization
100% of its total budget* to utilized 70% or utilized 71-99% utilized 100% of
implement GAD PAPs? less of its total or less of its total its total budget to
(possible scores are 0, 0.5 and budget to budget to implement GAD
1) *refers to the total GAA of implement GAD implement GAD PAPs
NGAs and LGUs or COB for PAPs PAPs
GOCCs

5.4 Has the organization Database with Database with Database with
established a centralized SDD and/or SDD and/or SDD and/or
database with sex- gender statistics gender statistics gender statistics
disaggregated data and/or established but utilized in 1-2 utilized in all
gender statistics accessible to accessible only stages of the stages of the
its regional offices and attached to the central development development
agencies, as well as external office planning cycle planning cycle
clients and partner
organizations? (possible scores
are 0, 0.5 and 1)

5.5 Is the Knowledge KM system of the KM system of the KM system of the

Management (KM) system of organization not organization organization
the organization integrated with integrated with integrated with integrated with
GAD and replicated by other GAD and not GAD and GAD and
organizations? (possible scores replicated by replicated by 1-2 replicated by 3 or
are 0, 0.5 and 1) other organizations more
organizations organizations

Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 5 Enabling Mechanisms)

TOTAL GMEF SCORE
(Enabling Mechanisms)
UESTIONNAIRE - ENABLING MECHANISMS
Score per item Means of Verification/Remarks
Answer

Attach the directory of the newly-created/recon- stituted GFPS of the

organization, including its regional and attached offices as applicable*

*Agencies with created/reconstituted GFPS or similar GAD mechanisms in accordance

with mentioned pertinent guide- lines with no regional and attached offices will be
awarded 1.67 points equivalent to a “yes” answer
0

If yes, list down the exploratory activities initiated by the organization

(e.g. meeting with PCW for the identification of necessary capacity
develop- ment activities for GFPS and staff members) to facilitate gender
mainstreaming

0
List of
Organizations/ Exploratory
Activities Remarks
Individuals
Conducted

Attach intake forms such as attendance sheets, profile forms, etc., with
separate columns for sex, used by the organization to gather sex-
disaggregated data. Include list of information that can be disaggregated
by sex (e.g. list of client beneficiaries, service providers, partners, etc.)
0

0
 If GFPS is performing limited functions, explain the challenges faced by
the GFPS of the organization in mainstreaming GAD. (In a sheet of
paper)

Enumerate other GAD mechanisms established [e.g. Committee on

Decorum and Investigation (CODI), Violence against Women and their
Children (VAWC) Referral System, Barangay Violence against Women
(VAW) Desk, Women’s Economic Empowerment (WEE) Desk, etc.]

Other GAD
Mechanism/s Function/s Members Date Established
Established
1
Grievance To provide school personel
Committee assistance to
school staff with
issues
Guidance and To provide school personel
Counselling assistance to
school staff with
issues
Attach the GAD Plan and Budget (GPB) and GAD Accomplishment
Report (GAD AR) of the organization for the same fiscal year (e.g. 2013
GPB and GAD AR)

If no, explain why budget allocated for the implementation of GAD PAPs
is less than 5%?
List down consultations with organizations/ individuals regarding the
conduct of GAD-related PAPs of the organization (e.g. conduct of a
series of capacity development activities and technical assistance for the
preparation of GPB, etc.):

List of
0 Purpose of Engagement (e.g.,
Organizations/ Results of
request for review of GAD PB,
Individuals Engagement
etc.)
Engaged
 If yes, enumerate types of SDD and/or gender statistics collected or
generated (e.g., sex- disaggregated profile of employees, client
beneficiaries, cases of VAW, etc.).

0 If applicable, list down installed gender- responsive data collection

system/s of the organization (e.g. National Violence Against Women
(NVAW) referral system, gender- responsive Community-Based
Monitoring System (CBMS) etc.)

2
uestion, 1)
Attach status/progress report of the other GAD mechanisms established
by the organization, including analysis of its functions and
recommendations.

Attach the GPB and GAD AR from the same fiscal year (e.g. 2013 GPB
and 2013 GAD AR)

Attach a copy of the Audit Observation Memo (AOM) or Notice of

Suspension and Disallowances (NDs) received from the Commission
on Audit (COA) and the organization’s justification, if applicable.

List the partnership/s or joint program/s towards the strategic

implementation of the organization’s GAD PAPs (e.g. partnership for the
conduct of a GAD-related program)

Name of partner
GAD Effort Type of
agency/ instotution/ Inclusive Dates
Implemented Engagement
0
Individual
0

If applicable, attach copies of Memorandum of Agreement (MOA),

Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), Terms of Reference (TORs),
Partnership Agreement, etc.

List GAD-related data and indicators used in the development planning

cycle.

Development Data Utilized Output Indicators Used to

Planning Cycle Measure Gender-
0 Stage Related Impacts of
PAPs
Context Dev't
Gender in Dev't

Attach status/progress report, client satisfaction survey, results of gender

impact assessment, documented testimonies, etc.

Attach the GPB and GAD AR of the organization for the same fiscal year
(e.g. 2020 GPB and 2020 GAD AR).

Enumerate sector-specific KPs developed from database with SDD

and/or gender statistics (e.g. caselets, case studies, briefers, fact sheets,
etc.).

Title of Sector Content of the Utilization of

0 Specific Knowledge Knowledge the Knowledge
Products Products Products
 Attach copies of M&E reports reflecting gen- der-related impacts of the
organization’s GAD PAPs on its internal and external clients, such as:

1. NGAs: Gender Impact Assessment (GIA); Annual Audit Reports

(AARs); Audit Financial Reports (AFRs); Special Audit Reports
(SARs); Socio-Economic Reports (SERs), Philippine Development
Plan (PDP) Reports, program/project reports, accomplishment reports
and other related knowledge products (KPs);

0
2. LGUs: End of term reports; Annual Audit Reports (AARs);
administrative/ accomplishment reports; State of the Municipal
Address (SOMA); State of the Province Address (SOPA), Socio-
Economic Reports (SERs), Regional Project Monitoring & Evaluation
System (RPMES) Reports, program/project reports, and other related
knowledge products

Identify indicators that measure gender-related impacts of the

organization’s GAD PAPs.
Explain how the organization’s KM system facilitates the sharing of GAD-
related KPs to its clients (internal and/or external).(In sheet of paper)
Attach the list of KPs produced and shared through the KM system as
well as the KM Plan/ framework or link of the KM system, if applicable.
0

List awards/citations/documented testimonies received.

Awarding Local/ National/ Awards/ Citation

0 Year
Institutions International Received

List awards/citations/documented testimonies received.

Awarding Local/ National/ Awards/ Citation

Year
0 Institutions International Received
 Attach the GPB and GAD AR of the organization for the same fiscal year
(e.g. 2013 GPB and 2013 GAD AR)

Please provide link of database with SDD If the data is not uploaded in a
website, list the information/data that are accessible to regional offices,
attached agencies, external clients and partner organizations.

Explain how GAD is integrated in the KM system of the organization and

list down other organizations that replicated the KM system.

3
 PROGRAMS, ACTIVITIES AND PROJECTS (PAPs) ASSESSM
SCORE Score per item
DESCRIPTORS Partly
No Partly Yes NO
YES

1. Initial Activities to Facilitate GAD Mainstreaming (max score: 5; for each item or question:0.83)
1.1 Is the organization observing Organization has Organization Organization
international/ national/local not initiated or initiated or initiated or
GAD-related events (possible participated in participated in 1- participated in 3
scores are 0, 0.41 and 0.83) the observance 2 observance of or more
of international/ observance of
international/nati national/ local international/nati
onal/ local GAD- GAD-related onal/ local GAD-
related events events related events

1.2 Has the organization No Basic GAD Basic GAD Basic GAD
conducted Basic GAD orientation or Orientation or Orientation or
Orientation or Gender Sensitivity GST conducted GST conducted GST conducted
Training (GST) for its clients for its clients for either internal for both internal
(internal and external)? or external and external x
(possible scores are 0, 0.41 and clients clients
0.83)

1.3 Has the organization No consultation Conducted Conducted

conducted consultation activities conducted with consultation with consultation with
with clients (internal and clients either internal or both internal and
external) to identify gender external clients external clients
issues and corresponding to identify gender to identify gender
strategies? (possible scores are issues and issues and x
0, 0.41 and 0.83) corresponding corresponding
strategies strategies

1.4 Has the organization No consultation Initiated Initiated

consulted PCW and relevant conducted at all consultation with consultation with
organizations/ individuals on its either PCW or both PCW and
GAD mainstreaming efforts? relevant relevant
(possible scores are 0, 0.41 and organizations/ organizations/ x
0.83) individuals on its individuals on its
GAD GAD
mainstreaming mainstreaming
efforts efforts
1.5 Has the organization No review of 1-3 existing IEC 4 or more
reviewed and revised existing existing IEC materials and existing IEC
Information/Education/ materials and KPs reviewed materials and
Communication (IEC) materials KPs conducted but not revised KPs reviewed
and Knowledge Products (KPs) and revised
to ensure use of gender-fair x
language and images? (possible
scores are 0, 0.41 and 0.83)

1.6 Has the organization set up No plan to set up GAD IEC Established GAD
a GAD corner? (possible scores GAD corner materials and corner with
are 0, 0.41 and 0.83) KPs compiled updated GAD
and collected to IEC materials x
set up GAD and KPs
corner

Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 1 PAPs)

2. Establishing Commitment towards Gender Mainstreaming (max score: 5; for each item or question: 0.62)
2.1 Has the organization No GAD agenda Draft GAD GAD agenda or
formulated GAD agenda or or strategic agenda or strategic
strategic framework? (possible framework strategic framework
scores are 0, 0.31 and 0.62) formulated framework formulated and x
formulated approved

2.2 Has the organization GPB is not GPB is based on GPB is based on
developed its GAD Plan and based on GAD at least 1 of the at least 3 of the
Budget (GPB) based on GAD agenda/GAD following: GAD following: GAD
agenda, emerging gender Code, emerging agenda/GAD agenda/ GAD
issues, international/ national gender issues, Code, emerging Code, emerging
GAD mandates and/or results of international/nati gender issues, gender issues,
gender analysis? (possible onal GAD international/ international/ x
scores are 0, 0.31 and 0.62) mandates and/ national GAD national GAD
or results of mandates and/or mandates and/or
gender analysis results of gender results of gender
analysis analysis

2.3 Has the organization No deepening Conducted Conducted

conducted deepening sessions sessions on GAD deepening deepening
on GAD based on the results of conducted session/s on sessions on GAD
the Training Needs Assessment GAD for either for either GFPS
(TNA) or updated GAD policies the GFPS or or concerned
and tools as part of the concerned staff staff members
continuing capacity development members but not based on the
x
of GAD Focal Point System based on the results of TNA or
(GFPS) and concerned staff results of TNA or updated GAD
members? (possible scores are updated GAD policies or tools
0, 0.31 and 0.62) policies or tools

2.4 Has the organization used No GA tool Results of the Results of the
Gender Analysis (GA) tools and applied to application of GA application of GA
techniques in the review, develop, review tools used to tools used to
enhancement or development of and/or enhance review, enhance review, enhance
PAPs? (possible scores are 0, PAPs or develop 1-2 or develop 3 or x
0.31 and 0.62) PAPs more PAPs
2.4 Has the organization used No GA tool Results of the Results of the
Gender Analysis (GA) tools and applied to application of GA application of GA
techniques in the review, develop, review tools used to tools used to
enhancement or development of and/or enhance review, enhance review, enhance
PAPs? (possible scores are 0, PAPs or develop 1-2 or develop 3 or x
0.31 and 0.62) PAPs more PAPs

2.5 Does the organization have No facilities and With existing With existing
facilities and services that services facilities and facilities and
address the gender issues and addressing services that services that
concerns of its clients (internal gender issues address the address gender
and external)? (possible scores and concerns of gender issues issues and
are 0, 0.31 and 0.62) the and concerns of concerns of both
organization’s either internal or internal and
clients external clients external clients x

2.6 Has the organization No GAD Developed GAD Developed GAD

developed orientation modules orientation orientation orientation
for new employees with gender- module with module but not module and
sensitivity as a core gender yet included in included in the
competency? (possible scores sensitivity as a the orientation of orientation of
are 0, 0.31 and 0.62) core competency new employees new employees
developed No Developed but Developed and x
new GAD IEC has not disseminated
materials disseminated new GAD IEC
developed new GAD IEC materials
materials

2.7 Has the organization No new GAD Developed but Developed and
developed and disseminated IEC materials has not disseminated
new Information/Education/ developed disseminated new GAD IEC
Communication (IEC) materials new GAD IEC materials
on GAD to clients (internal and materials
x
external)? (possible scores are
0, 0.31 and 0.62)

2.8 Has the organization created No GAD section Developed GAD Developed GAD
a GAD section in its website? in the agency section in section in
(possible scores are 0, 0.31 and website organization organization
0.62) website but not website and x
updated regularly updated

Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 2 PAPs)

3. GAD Application (max score: 5; for each item or question: 0.71)
3.1 Has the organization Implementation Implementation Implementation
monitored the implementation of of GAD PAPs not of GAD PAPs of GAD PAPs
its GAD Programs/ monitored intermittently regularly
Activities/Projects (PAPs)? monitored and monitored and x
(possible scores are 0, 0.35 and not reported reported
0.71)
3.2 Has the organization GPB and GAD GPB and GAD GPB and GAD
prepared and submitted on time AR not submitted ARsubmitted to AR endorsed by
its GAD Plan and Budget (GPB) to PCW/DILG PCW*/ DILG** PCW*/ DILG**
and GAD Accomplishment but not endorsed
Report (GAD AR)? (possible
scores are 0, 0.35 and 0.71)
x

*PCW endorses GPBs of NGAs,

GOCCs and SUCs

**DILG endorses GPBs of LGUs

3.3  Has the organization No GAD capacity GAD capacity GAD capacity
conducted and sustained the development development development
GAD capacity development of its conducted and conducted and conducted and
clients (internal and external)? sustained for sustained for sustained for
either internal or x
(possible scores are 0, 0.35 and clients external clients both internal and
0.71) external clients

3.4  Has the organization No GAD capacity Conducted GAD Conducted GAD
conducted GAD capacity development capacity capacity
development sessions for its session development development
internal GAD experts? (possible conducted to session but no session that
scores are 0, 0.35 and 0.71) develop internal internal GAD resulted in the
GAD experts experts development of
developed internal GAD
experts

3.5  Has the organization No GA tools No GA tools GA tools applied

regularly applied Gender applied in applied in in all levels of the
Analysis (GA) tools in the development development development
development planning cycle planning cycle planning cycle planning cycle
(planning, implementation and x
management, and monitoring
and evaluation)? (possible
scores are 0, 0.35 and 0.71)

3.6 Has the organization GAD section has GAD section GAD section
regularly updated its GAD not been updated annually updated
section in the website? (possible updated for more quarterly or more
scores are 0, 0.35 and 0.71) than a year often x

No existing plan Has initial plan to Has set up a KM

3.7 Has the organization set up to set up KM set up KM system to
a Knowledge Management (KM) transfer
system as a mechanism to knowledge on
x
transfer knowledge on GAD? GAD
(possible scores are 0, 0.35 and
0.35 and 0.71)

Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 3 PAPs)

4. GAD Commitment and Institutionalization (max score: 5; for each item or question, 1.0)
GAD mandate GAD mandates GAD mandates
not implemented continuously continuously
4.1 Has the organization
and monitored implemented but implemented and
sustained implementation and not regularly regularly
monitoring of international,
monitored by the monitored by the x
national and local GAD
organization organization
mandates in its PAPs? (possible
scores are 0,0.5, and 1)

4.2 Has the organization No Organizational/ Organizational/

conducted organizational/sector- organizational sector-specific sector-specific
specific capacity development sector- specific GAD capacity GAD capacity
sessions on GAD for clients capacity development development
session/s
(internal and external)? development session/s conducted for
(possible scores are 0,0.5, and session/s on conducted for both internal or
1) GAD conducted either internal or external clients
external clients

4.3 Does the organization GAD tools not GAD tools used GAD tools used
regularly apply gender analysis applied to assess to assess to assess
(GA) tools to assess gender- PAPs gender- gender-
responsiveness of responsiveness responsiveness
x
programs/activities/ projects of 1-2 PAPs of 3 or more
(PAPs)? (possible scores are PAPs
0,0.5, and 1)

4.4 Has the organization No sustainability Draft Sustainability

developed a sustainability action action plan on sustainability action plan on
plan for its GAD PAPs? GAD PAPs action plan on GAD PAPs
(possible scores are 0,0.5, and formulated GAD PAPs formulated and x
1) formulated approved

4.5 Has the organization Gender impact Impact Impact

conducted impact evaluation of assessment not assessment of assessment of
its GAD PAPs? (possible scores yet conducted GAD PAPs on- GAD PAPs x
are 0,0.5, and 1) going completed and
reported

Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 4 PAPs)

5. Model PAPs (max score: 5; for each item or question: 1.25)
5.1 Has the organization been Organization is Organization has Organization has
recognized as a GAD learning still developing been recognized been recognized
hub for its notable GAD PAPs? notable GAD as a learning hub as a learning hub
(possible scores are 0, 0.62 and PAPs but GAD PAPs and its GAD
1.25) are not yet PAPs are
replicated replicated by x
other
organizations
hub for its notable GAD PAPs? notable GAD as a learning hub as a learning hub
(possible scores are 0, 0.62 and PAPs but GAD PAPs and its GAD
1.25) are not yet PAPs are
replicated replicated by x
other
organizations

5.2 Has the organization’s No convergence Convergence Convergence

partnership with stakeholders model resulting model model
resulted in a convergence model from partnership recognized but recognized and
that is recognized and replicated not replicated replicated
x
by other organizations?
(possible scores are 0, 0.62 and
1.25)

5.3 Has the organization’s GAD KPs and GAD KPs and GAD KPs and
Knowledge Products (KPs) and GAD IEC GAD IEC GAD IEC
Information/Education/ materials not yet materials used materials used
Communication (IEC) materials cited as and cited as and cited as
on GAD been used by other reference by reference by at reference by 3 or
organizations? (possible scores other 1-2 organizations more
are 0, 0.62 and 1.25) organizations organizations x

5.4 Has the organization’s Award system Award system Award/incentive

existing award/incentive system not yet integrated being reviewed system
been integrated with GAD with GAD for integration of integrated with x
perspective? (possible scores perspective GAD perspective GAD perspective
are 0, 0.62 and 1.25)

Sub-total GMEF Score (Level 5 PAPs)

TOTAL GMEF SCORE (PAPs)
PROGRAMS, ACTIVITIES AND PROJECTS (PAPs)
ECTS (PAPs) ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE
Score per item
Means of Verification/Remarks
YES Answer

uestion:0.83)
Enumerate GAD-related events initiated or participated by the
organization (e.g. International Women’s Day celebration).

GAD-related Done
Initiated Participated
event Conducted
Advocacies to
address gender
x 0.83 health
advocacies,
protective
equipment and
measure in the
DepEd offices

Attach training design, attendance sheets and results of training

evaluation, if available.

0.41 If no, explain why GAD Orientation or Gender Sensitivity Training

(GST) has not been conducted for the organization’s clients.

Discuss the results of consultation activities conducted. If consultations

were conducted, what gender-related issues were reflected in the
GPB?

Group
0.41 Results of Consultation
Consulted
Purpose (gender issues and
(Internal /
strategies identified)
External)

Enumerate results of consultations initiated including names of

organizations/individuals consulted.
Name of Agenda of the Results of the Consultation
organizations/ Consultation
0.41 individuals
consulted
 Provide a list of IEC materials reviewed and revised to ensure use of
gender-fair language and images.

0.41

Provide a copy of the plan or photo layout of the GAD corner and list
down titles of existing Information/Education/Communication (IEC)
materials and KPs available for use and reference of clients and GAD
0.41 Focal Point System (GFPS) members.

2.88
h item or question: 0.62)
Attach draft or approved GAD agenda and/ or strategic framework (e.g.
Department Order setting 3-year GAD agenda of agencies or GAD
Code for LGUs).
0

Attach GPB for the most recent fiscal year citing the basis for its
development.

Agenda/ Gad Code, emerging

0.31 Content of GPB gender issues, international/ Remarks
national GAD mandates/

Enumerate the deepening sessions on GAD conducted for GFPS and

concerned staff: Also attach a copy of Training Needs Analysis (TNA)
results and design of deepening sessions. If TNA was not administered,
please explain how the organization identified the need for deepening
sessions and explain the basis for the training design/s used.

0
Title of TA Provider (in Date
Deepening house trainer, Conducted
Session PCW)

Enumerate GA tools used to develop, review and/or enhance PAPs.

Name of PAPs GA tools Results of

Applied Applications
0.31
0.31

Enumerate facilities and services addressing gender issues and

concerns of the organization.

Clients Gender Issues

GAD Facilities &
(Internal / & Concerns
Services
External) Addressed
0

(e.g. Facilities to address strategic and practical gender needs of

women and men employees such as child-minding center,
breastfeeding center, and CODI, among others)

Attach copy of GAD orientation module(s) with gender-sensitivity as a

core competency. Provide list of new GAD IEC materials and the target
audience.

0.31

Provide list of new GAD IEC materials and the target audience.

0
GAD IEC Target Audience Remarks
Materials

Please list website link for the GAD Section of the organization.

0.31

1.24

Attach monitoring reports on the implementation of Gad PAPs.

0.35
 Provide copies of submitted and/or endorsed GAD Plans and Budgets
(GPBs) and GAD Accomplishment Reports (GAD ARs), including cover
letters.

0.35

List GAD capacity development activities conducted for clients.

GAD Capacity
Target Inclusive
0 Development
Participants Dates
Activities

Enumerate GAD capacity development sessions conducted, and

provide a list of internal experts and their areas of expertise developed
through these sessions.

Title and Date

of GAD
x 0.71 Internal GAD
Capacity
Experts Remarks
Development
Developed
Activity
Conducted

Enumerate GA tools applied in any stage of the development planning

cycle and the frequency of application

0.35
GAD Tools Purpose of Result of Date of
Applied Application Application Application

Provide a schedule involving the update of the GAD section in the

organization’s website.
0.35

Attach the Knowledge Management (KM) system plan/framework or

web link.

0.35

2.46
, 1.0)
List down GAD-related mandates being implemented and monitored by
the organization and attach the relevant monitoring reports.

0.5

List down titles of organizational/sector- specific capacity development

session/s on GAD conducted or discuss status of the development of
sector-specific GAD capacity development session/s for clients being
done by the organization (e.g. Women’s Economic Empowerment,
Gender and Justice, Gender and Climate Change).

Title of
Organizational/
0.5 Sector-Specific
Participants Purpose
Capacity
Development
Program on GAD

Attach activity reports and/or documentation of the sector-specific

capacity development sessions conducted.
List down Programs/Activities/Projects (PAPs) assessed and list of
gender analysis (GA) tools regularly applied by the organization.

0 Results of
GA Tools Applied PAP Assessed
Application

Attach draft or approved sustainability action plan on GAD PAPs of the

organization.

0.5

Attach a copy of Gender Impact Assessment Report of the

organization’s GAD PAPs.
0.5

List down awards/citations/recognitions/ nominations received.

GAD Program/
Award/ Citation
Activity/ Project Year
Received
0.62
Recognized
0.62

Describe GAD convergence model that resulted from the partnership

and list down organizations that replicated it.

0.62

List down GAD KPs and GAD Information/ Education/Communication

(IEC) materials developed and utilized by the organization (e.g. MCW
mobile application, videos, brochures, etc.).

0.62 Organiza- tions

GAD KP/ GAD
Type of GAD KP/ that Utilized
IEC Material Remarks
GAD IEC Material GAD KP/ GAD
Developed
IEC Material

Attach criteria for the existing award/incentive system integrated with

GAD perspective and provide list of the awardees.
0.62

2.48
11.06