Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Standard Club - SP Full Report 2017
Standard Club - SP Full Report 2017
Standard Club - SP Full Report 2017
Secondary Contact:
Mark D Nicholson, London (44) 20-7176-7991; mark.nicholson@spglobal.com
Table Of Contents
Rationale
Outlook
Base-Case Scenario
Company Description
Other Assessments
Accounting Considerations
Related Criteria
Financial Risk
Holistic Sovereign Gov't
Analysis 0 Risk 0 Support 0
Strong
Rationale
Business Risk Profile: Strong
• Sustained improvement in underwriting performance, which has helped maintain the club's extremely strong
capital adequacy, a key strength for the rating.
• Underlying strong financial flexibility due to the club's ability to make unbudgeted supplementary calls and
impose premium increases for mutual business.
• Extended stop-loss arrangement and 'AAA' level capital surplus, with the potential to mitigate the extent of
future capital and earnings volatility.
Other Factors
• S&P Global Ratings has elected to assign the higher of the two possible anchors, reflecting Standard Europe's
excess of capital at the 'AAA' level, under our capital model, stable operating performance and our expectation
that the club's capital adequacy will remain at the 'AAA' level through 2018.
Outlook: Stable
The stable outlook reflects our expectation that Standard Europe will maintain capital and earnings at the 'AAA'
level measured according to the S&P Global Ratings capital model. We also anticipate that the club will maintain
its operating performance at a level consistent with our base-case forecast of a combined ratio of less than 105%
and deliver positive post-tax surplus in a typical year.
Downside scenario
We might lower the ratings if, contrary to our expectations, we consider that Standard Europe's capital adequacy is
no longer likely to remain at the 'AAA' confidence level in our risk-based model.
Upside scenario
We do not consider an upgrade to be likely over the two-year rating horizon.
Base-Case Scenario
Macroeconomic Assumptions
• Global shipping companies will continue to face difficult operating conditions in 2017, characterized by fragile
demand and chronic structural oversupply in the industry.
• Charter rates might finally be bottoming out in subsectors such as drybulk, container liner, and liquefied natural
gas shipping. That said, they remain subdued and this, combined with the rising price of the oil-based fuel used
to run ships (bunker fuel), will continue to constrain cash flow generation for most ship operators.
• Neither the IG pool structure nor the pool sharing methodology will change significantly.
• Increased capacity in the reinsurance markets will continue to have a positive impact on IG group reinsurance
and retention protection premium and terms.
• Competition will continue to increase in the fixed premium business with all IG clubs now offering a fixed
premium alternative in some form.
Company-Specific Assumptions
• Capital adequacy within the 'AAA' range when modelled by our capital model.
• A net combined ratio of less than 105%, in the absence of any abnormal large loss events.
• A group post-tax surplus of around $5 million-$12 million annually for 2018 and 2019.
• Operational risks and capital requirements from the Standard Syndicate 1884 will be managed within the club's
risk appetite.
Key Metrics
Company Description
Standard Europe is a midsize marine P&I mutual club with owned and chartered tonnage of 150 million gross tons. We
regard Standard Reinsurance (Bermuda) Ltd. and The Standard Club Asia Ltd. as core group entities to Standard
Europe. Combined with Standard Europe, they comprise The Standard Club (or the club). The financial figures
included in this report are based on the consolidated group position.
The club is a member of the IG, an association of 13 mutual clubs, which between them write 90% of global P&I
business. IG members benefit from a joint excess-of-loss reinsurance program and from the pooling of risks. If a
member incurs large claims, it may access the pool for funds to settle those claims, but will then have to repay those
amounts to the pool over time.
The Standard Club also owns a stake of the Standard Syndicate 1884, which commenced operations in 2015. As of
February 2017, the club has a 47% share (40%: 2016) in the syndicate. The syndicate writes hull, marine, and
nonmarine risks. In 2017, the club's share of the syndicate comprised premiums of $30.4 million and losses of $12.6
million.
For the P&I insurance sector, we assess country risk as low. This reflects that P&I insurers' exposures are heavily
weighted to developed markets, most of which present low country risk. Since we do not anticipate any significant
shift in the P&I sector's weighting to developed markets with low country risk, we think it unlikely that we would have
cause to revise our view of the sector's country risk. We believe the domicile of a P&I insurer has relatively little
impact on the aggregate industry and country risks it faces and therefore we do not differentiate by domicile.
Our P&I sector insurance industry risk score is moderate. Although we see profitability and product risk as negative,
these factors are offset by the sector's operational barriers to entry.
Despite a recent improvement in underwriting profitability over the past four years, and in our short-term forecasts, we
continue to view profitability of the global P&I insurance sector as negative. Our view reflects the inherent volatility in
operating results and still significant reliance on investment returns to bolster earnings. We assess the potential for
product risks to trigger earnings volatility as negative. The nature of the business is such that it is susceptible to the
random size and frequency of claims, as reflected in the high year-on-year variation in combined ratios. We consider
the barriers to entry for the global P&I insurance sector to be positive. This assessment incorporates regulatory and
operational barriers; we view the former as low and the latter as high.
Table 1
The Standard Club Europe Ltd. Insurance Industry & Country Risk
Sector *IICRA (%) of premiums
Global protection & indemnity 3 91
Global property & casualty reinsurance 3 9
Overall IICRA 3 100
Competitive position
Standard Europe's membership of the IG is a key part of our assessment of its competitive position. Historically,
non-IG players and fixed-premium providers have had limited success in the sector.
Our assessment is also based on the high level of control that Standard Europe has over its sources of premium. The
club has a high customer retention rate, in part due to the IG's restrictions on price competition, but also due to
Standard Europe's reputation within the market. The club also has a wide geographic spread of members in many
different markets. The largest geographic areas are Europe and Asia, accounting for over 70% of the club's tonnage.
We do not expect the club to be directly impacted by the U.K.'s vote to leave the European Union.
The club has demonstrated a track record of reporting sustainable and stable combined (loss and expense) ratios. For
example, the club reported a headline combined ratio of 92.4% for the year ending February 2017 and 92.9% for
February 2016, partly aided by the benign claims environment currently prevailing in the sector. We believe that the
club will implement further general rate increases in their P&I book and at a level sufficient to sustain technical
break-even and maintain performance in line with peers. In our base-case scenario, we expect Standard Europe's gross
premium to grow at around 1.5%-3% per year over the next two years, with a slowdown in the P&I segment offset by
an increase in the premium base of Syndicate 1884.
Table 2
The Standard Club Europe Ltd. Competitive Position
2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Gross premium earned (mil. $) 339.0 354.0 354.0 336.1 294.1
Change in gross premium earned (%) (4.4) 0.1 5.3 14.3 2.8
Total assets (mil. $) 1,059 1,033 1,024 988 978
Change in total assets (%) 2.5 0.9 3.6 1.0 5.8
The club reported a bottom-line surplus of $41 million at the February 2017 financial year end (2016: $10.5 million).
Our base-case scenario assumes that Standard Europe is likely to achieve breakeven underwriting, a strategic priority
for the club, and combined ratios below 105%, barring a series of major losses. This reflects the club's disciplined
pricing, as well as its mutual status. We anticipate that the club will produce a surplus of $5 million-$12 million a year
over the next two years. We expect the club to maintain capital commensurate to our 'AAA' requirement in our
risk-based capital model, with sufficient buffer to manage risks from its P&I operations and from its share of the
Syndicate 1884.
Table 3
The Standard Club Europe Ltd. Capital
2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Adjusted free reserves (mil. $) 431 390 380 369 363
Capital adequacy Extremely Strong Extremely Strong Extremely Strong Extremely Strong Extremely Strong
Change in adjusted free reserves (%) 10.4 2.6 3.2 1.6 2.8
Table 4
The Standard Club Europe Ltd. Earnings
2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Net income (mil. $) 41.2 10.5 11.8 5.9 10.0
Expense ratio (%) 19.0 15.9 12.2 11.1 13.8
Loss ratio (%) 73.4 77.0 87.9 90.1 107.1
Combined ratio (%) 92.4 92.9 100.1 101.2 120.9
Risk position
We base our assessment on the club's exposure to capital and earnings volatility through the unpredictable nature of
claims size and frequency that is inherent to the P&I sector and from writing marine business at Lloyd's.
Standard Europe has historically experienced earnings volatility as a result of the IG pool reinsurance mechanism.
However, the club's share of the IG poolable arrangement has been reducing, which we see as positive. Pool claims are
large and unpredictable, so a lower share of the pool reduces the club's claims volatility. This also aids the
predictability of premium requirements.
For the 2016/2017 policy year, the club purchased a reinsurance stop-loss policy, limiting the loss on a policy year.
We view these developments positively because they mitigate the effects of potential capital and earnings volatility.
Offsetting these factors are the exposures linked to the P&I sector and the risks associated with Syndicate 1884.
Although underwriting discipline and risk controls embedded in the club's framework have improved, we consider the
P&I sector to be highly cyclical. We believe that sluggish shipping conditions have had some positive influence on the
club's track record of stable earnings and capital. In our view, the capital requirements associated with the syndicate
are currently manageable, but add operational challenges to the club's performance. Generally Lloyd's syndicates
require scale to operate efficiently and Syndicate 1884 is still in a start-up phase.
Table 5
The Standard Club Europe Ltd. Risk Position
2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Total invested assets (mil. $) 922 899 888 887 852
Bond investments (%) 63 62 70 63 70
Equity investments (%) 23 21 17 21 18
Cash investments (%) 12 13 10 13 10
Real estate investments (%) 3 4 4 4 3
Financial flexibility
Financial flexibility--defined as the ability to source capital relative to capital requirements--remains strong, based on
the club's ability to collect unlimited additional premiums (by making unbudgeted supplementary calls) from members
on open policy years, or to impose significant premium increases at renewal. However, unlike many of its IG peers,
Standard Europe has not utilized this right for over 10 years, which we believe should enhance its capacity to do so if
needed. The club currently has no debt on its balance sheet. As such, a debt issue represents a further potential
funding source for the club. In the absence of a sharp fall in investment markets or an above-average frequency of
high-value claims, our base-case scenario assumes that Standard Europe is unlikely to need additional capital over the
next three years.
Other Assessments
We regard Standard Europe's enterprise risk management (ERM) and management and governance practices as
neutral for the rating.
strategic decisions into constructive action, reflected in the board's commitment to break-even underwriting
performance and the subsequent sustained improvement in underwriting results. For example, the club has reported
net combined ratios in the range of 92%-102% over 2014-2017, compared with 120% in 2012 and 121% in 2013. The
change in strategic mind-set over the recent years has translated into a track record of sustainable operating
performance and actions to prudently manage potential financial volatility.
Accounting Considerations
As the IG pooling agreement provides a mutual reinsurance mechanism for the IG, we treat the amount paid into the
pool--$32.4 million in 2017--as ceded reinsurance premiums, rather than gross claims incurred.
Related Criteria
• General Criteria: Group Rating Methodology, Nov. 19, 2013
• Criteria - Insurance - General: Enterprise Risk Management, May 7, 2013
• Criteria - Insurance - General: Insurers: Rating Methodology, May 7, 2013
• General Criteria: Methodology: Management And Governance Credit Factors For Corporate Entities And Insurers,
Nov. 13, 2012
• Criteria - Insurance - General: Refined Methodology And Assumptions For Analyzing Insurer Capital Adequacy
Using The Risk-Based Insurance Capital Model, June 7, 2010
• General Criteria: Use Of CreditWatch And Outlooks, Sept. 14, 2009
Additional Contact:
Insurance Ratings Europe; InsuranceInteractive_Europe@spglobal.com
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part
thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval
system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be
used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or
agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not
responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for
the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an "as is" basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL
EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR
A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT'S FUNCTIONING
WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no
event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential
damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by
negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and
not statements of fact. S&P's opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase,
hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to
update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment
and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does
not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be
reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain
regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P
Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any
damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective
activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established
policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P
reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites,
www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription) and www.spcapitaliq.com
(subscription) and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information
about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
STANDARD & POOR'S, S&P and RATINGSDIRECT are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC.